Qnas with Hopi Hoekstra

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Qnas with Hopi Hoekstra QNAS QNAS QnAs with Hopi Hoekstra Prashant Nair Science Writer Mexico desert and the sweeping prairie grasslands of the American Great Plains. For her molecular insights into adaptation, Hoekstra won the 2015 Richard Lounsberry [N]ature cares nothing for appearances, except found otherwise. Among those who have in so far as they may be useful to any being. She Award (www.nasonline.org/programs/awards/ attempted to chronicle the inexorable march richard-lounsbery-award.html)oftheNational can act on every internal organ, on every shade of natural selection with clockwork pre- of constitutional difference, on the whole ma- Academy of Sciences. PNAS spoke to Hoekstra chinery of life. cision is Harvard University evolutionary to commemorate the honor. geneticist Hopi Hoekstra, whose well- PNAS: What spurred your interest in the Since its publication more than 150 years ago, recognized work has revealed how incre- genetic basis of adaptation? Charles Darwin’s sly observation has earned mental genetic changes allow animals to Hoekstra: As a graduate student, I entered the status of demonstrable fact. Darwin also acquire new traits and adapt to changing the field at a time when molecular markers, held that the stepwise process of natural se- ’ environments. Hoekstra stidyexperimental like microsatellites and mitochondrial DNA lection, which sifts through variation and designs have been tested in wide-ranging sequences, were being used to ask organism- winnows disadvantages, is largely hidden settings, such as the gypsum sands that level questions, such as what is a species’ from human view. Yet his followers have ripple through the carnelian-colored New migration pattern or phylogeographic his- tory? By design, these markers were neu- tral, meaning they were used to trace traits of interest but did not directly influence the traits. The latter, to me, seemed more in- teresting, so as a postdoctoral fellow, I be- gan focusing on the genes that actually mattered for the traits. PNAS: Among several examples of such traits, you described in a PNAS article how three species of lizards inhabiting White Sands—an awesome terrain of snow-white gypsum dunes that appear to undulate across the Chihuahuan Desert in New Mexico— have each evolved blanched skin to blend into the dunes and avoid predators, whereas the brown-colored ancestral species has col- onized the dark soil of the adobe desert around the dunes (1). What did you find about the evolution of skin color in the Eastern fence lizard, the little striped whip- tail, and the lesser earless lizard? Hoekstra: We were interested in under- standing how similar traits evolve indepen- dently in different species that live in similar environments. In other words, we wanted to know how many genetic solutions there are to a common ecological problem. Among the three species of lizards we studied, we found that a candidate gene, called the melanocor- tin-1 receptor, which is a signaling receptor in the pigmentation pathway, was implicated in skin color in two species. In each of these species, we found a different mutation in this gene. Although both mutations result in light coloration, each acts through a different mechanism; one mutation reduces the strength of the receptor’s signal and the other affects the receptor’s integration into Hopi Hoekstra at Harvard’s Museum of Comparative Zoology. Image courtesy of Bear Cierci. the cell membrane, resulting in fewer active www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1508757112 PNAS Early Edition | 1of2 Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021 receptors. So you could have a few strong Once we nail down the relevant mouse genes, trait you may not immediately expect to be receptors or lots of weak receptors, and the we will of course look for similar variations in favored by natural selection as defense against functional outcome is roughly the same. the corresponding human genes, if any. But predation (after all, the bellies of mice are PNAS: In the same vein, you reported in that’s beyond the scope of this article. normally hidden from predators’ view). But, PNAS: Nature in 2013 that deer mice build small, Your work has led you into the the analysis suggested that belly color may simple burrows, unlike oldfield mice, a sister molecular thickets of adaptation. In your also be independently selected, bringing species, which build complex burrows with 2013 Science article, for example, you dis- us full circle to a surprising organism-level elaborately realized entrance and escape tun- sected the gene implicated in camouflage in insight. It is a case of one gene evolving nels (2). Your genetic analysis of differences in deer mice that scurry across the Nebraska mutations independently to fine-tune the burrow building revealed surprising insights. Sandhills, a rolling landscape of sand dune- Hoekstra: phenotype. We became interested in the speckled prairies that seem to recede into PNAS: ’ complex burrow architecture of the oldfield the horizon (3). You zeroed in on the mu- Your findings support Darwin s ’ mice when we found that the burrow-build- tations that enabled the ancestral dark- notion of evolution sstep-likeprogression. Hoekstra: ing trait in this species represented a gain of brownmicetoslowlyevolvebeigecoats If we had stopped with our ini- functional complexity. First of all, we were and dodge predators that hunt by sight. tial finding on the Agouti gene, we might surprised that the genetic control of what Hoekstra: In previous work, we had impli- have concluded that evolution proceeds in appeared to be a complex trait was largely cated the Agouti gene in deer mice coat color. big steps. But, when we dissected the gene to simple, tied to four regions of the genome, In this work, we probed the molecular mech- the level of mutations, we found that there are three of which were associated with the anisms underlying the adaptation. Because multiple, small-step mutations that underlie length of the burrow’s entrance tunnel. More- the light- and dark-colored mice have a lot adaptation. A lot of population genetics theory over, each region contributes specifically to a of pigmentation differences across their bod- is based on these mutations and not on the three-centimeter increase in tunnel length. So ies, we thought a single mutation in a classic genes themselves, so identifying the mutations if you introduced one of these regions from pigmentation gene, namely Agouti,mayun- does in fact reinforce Darwin’sideaofevolu- the big burrowing species into the genetic derlie the observed differences in the face, tion through small steps. background of the small burrowing one, the belly, back, and tail of the mice. But, we PNAS: What was your reaction to the prize small burrowing species will dig a tunnel, on found something quite surprising: There were announcement? average, three centimeters longer; add an- multiple mutations in the Agouti gene that Hoekstra: I was very surprised and am other region, and you get a tunnel six cen- affected color, and each mutation targeted a delighted to see that evolutionary genetics is timeters longer, add two, and the tunnel is different region of the body. And when we being represented in this way. I am also nine centimeters longer. We also found a looked for evidence of selection acting on different region of the genome that was these mutations, eight of the nine mutations thankful for all of the creative, dedicated, associated with the presence or absence of showed strong signatures of selection, but and hard-working collaborators, postdocs, an escape tunnel in the burrow. These find- only on the allele associated with light color and students with whom I have had the ings suggest that complex behaviors might (dark-colored mice stand out against the pleasure to work, both in the laboratory be built by piecing together small, simple dunes’ sun-bleached hues, inviting predators). and in the field, and in the past and in genetic modules. PNAS: Why was this finding surprising? the present. I have been very lucky to be PNAS: To go out on a limb, do the find- Hoekstra: Many studies have reported on part of such a fantastic team. ings have any bearing on human behavior? the genetic basis of adaptations, but few have Hoekstra: To understand how genes can pinpointed the mutations involved, and that affect specific behaviors at a neurobiological is because it is hard work. We started with an 1 Rosenblum EB, Römpler H, Schöneberg T, Hoekstra HE (2010) Molecular and functional basis of phenotypic convergence in white level is an exciting challenge. Even though observation at the organism level, asking lizards at White Sands. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107(5):2113–2117. this trait does not have a direct homolog in what mutations might underlie the color 2 Weber JN, Peterson BK, Hoekstra HE (2013) Discrete genetic humans—we don’t build burrows—it is variations in different regions of the body modules are responsible for complex burrow evolution in Peromyscus possible that some of the candidate genes between the two mouse species. That led us mice. Nature 493(7432):402–405. 3 Linnen CR, et al. (2013) Adaptive evolution of multiple traits we have pinpointed may underlie motivational to these eight different regions in the genome, through multiple mutations at a single gene. Science 339(6125): differences between the two mouse species. one of which is implicated in belly color, a 1312–1316. 2of2 | www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1508757112 Nair Downloaded by guest on September 24, 2021.
Recommended publications
  • Ricardo Mallarino Howard Hughes Medical Institute
    Ricardo Mallarino Howard Hughes Medical Institute; Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology and Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Harvard University, 26 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA Phone (617)-308-5895; email: [email protected] EDUCATION 2011-present Postdoctoral Fellow, Hopi Hoekstra Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 2005-2011 Ph.D., Biology, Arhat Abzhanov Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 1998-2003 B.S., Biology, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia RESEARCH INTERESTS Molecular basis of morphological change; developmental biology; ecology and evolutionary biology; genetics and genomics. RESEARCH EXPERIENCE 2011-present Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology and Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Hopi Hoekstra laboratory -Studied the molecular basis of local adaptation in Peromyscus mice using functional in vivo and in vitro approaches -Developed a new mammalian model species for studying the developmental basis of periodic pattern formation 2005-2011 Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Arhat Abzhanov laboratory -Identified a network of developmental genes responsible for generating beak diversity in Darwin’s finches -Studied beak patterning mechanisms in the relatives of Darwin’s finches 2005 Whitehead Institute, Susan Lindquist laboratory -Studied the role of molecular chaperones in controlling adaptive polyphenisms in insects 2003-2005 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, supervisors: Chris Jiggins and Biff Bermingham -Studied molecular systematics and phylogenetics of tropical butterflies 2001-2003 Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, supervisor: Penelope Barnes -Studied coevolution of marine bivalves of the Family Lucinidae and their sulfur-oxidizing bacterial endosymbionts RESEARCH GRANTS AND AWARDS 2012 Putnam Expeditionary Grant; Harvard University 2009 Doctoral Dissertation Improvement Grant, National Science Foundation 2008 Summer Research Grant, Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies, Harvard University 2005 Student Research Award, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • After an Intense Competition, 27 Scientists Had the Right Stuff to Be Selected As HHMI Investigators. Where Will Their Curiosity
    ARDEM PATAPOUTIAN DYCHE MULLINS JOHANNES C. WALTER HOPI HOEKSTRA After an intense competition, 27 scientists had the right stuff to be selected as HHMI investigators. Where will their curiosity take them? Explorersby jennifer michalowski CHUAN HE DAVID REICH HHMI © AKIKO IWASAKI RACHEL I. WILSON PETER W. REDDIEN HHMI, Karl Deisseroth: Alison Yin / AP / Yin Alison Deisseroth: Karl HHMI, © RUSSELL E. VANCE AVIV REGEV TIRIN MOORE AP / Tesfaye Bizuayehu Cohen: Adam KARL DEISSEROTH CHRISTOPHER D. LIMA NICOLE KING ExplorersEVGENY NUDLER VAMSI K. MOOTHA MICHAEL A. DYER PETER BAUMANN HARMIT S. MALIK HHMI, Chuan He: Peter Barreras Peter He: Chuan HHMI, © ADAM E. COHEN MARC R. FREEMAN MICHAEL S. BRAINARD HHMI, Marc Freeman: Aynsley Floyd / AP / Floyd Aynsley Freeman: Marc HHMI, © YUKIKO YAMASHITA JEAN-LAURENT CASANOVA NEIL HUNTER Michael Dyer: Lance Murphey / AP / Murphey Lance Dyer: Michael illustration by gluekit MICHAEL RAPE 26 Fall 2013 / HHMI Bulletin “people think science is linear, but there are so many ways to approach a problem,” says biophysicist Adam Cohen. “Creativity is the key to everything.” That is to say, the road to discovery may depend less on technical expertise than on a researcher’s ability to choose the right questions, design an elegant experiment, follow unexpected leads, and turn failures into opportunities. HHMI scientists are known for these qualities, and in May, the Institute selected Cohen and 26 other highly creative scientists to join the ranks as new investigators. Chosen from among 1,155 applicants and based at 19 host institutions nationwide, the new investigators are exploring a broad swath of biology, asking how songbirds learn to sing, how cells sense mechanical forces, and what we can learn about human evolution from ancient DNA, among other questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamics of Excitatory-Inhibitory Neuronal Networks With
    I (X;Y) = S(X) - S(X|Y) in c ≈ p + N r V(t) = V 0 + ∫ dτZ 1(τ)I(t-τ) P(N) = 1 V= R I N! λ N e -λ www.cosyne.org R j = R = P( Ψ, υ) + Mγ (Ψ, υ) σ n D +∑ j n k D k n MAIN MEETING Salt Lake City, UT Feb 27 - Mar 2 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................. Program Summary Thursday, 27 February 4:00 pm Registration opens 5:30 pm Welcome reception 6:20 pm Opening remarks 6:30 pm Session 1: Keynote Invited speaker: Thomas Jessell 7:30 pm Poster Session I Friday, 28 February 7:30 am Breakfast 8:30 am Session 2: Circuits I: From wiring to function Invited speaker: Thomas Mrsic-Flogel; 3 accepted talks 10:30 am Session 3: Circuits II: Population recording Invited speaker: Elad Schneidman; 3 accepted talks 12:00 pm Lunch break 2:00 pm Session 4: Circuits III: Network models 5 accepted talks 3:45 pm Session 5: Navigation: From phenomenon to mechanism Invited speakers: Nachum Ulanovsky, Jeffrey Magee; 1 accepted talk 5:30 pm Dinner break 7:30 pm Poster Session II Saturday, 1 March 7:30 am Breakfast 8:30 am Session 6: Behavior I: Dissecting innate movement Invited speaker: Hopi Hoekstra; 3 accepted talks 10:30 am Session 7: Behavior II: Motor learning Invited speaker: Rui Costa; 2 accepted talks 11:45 am Lunch break 2:00 pm Session 8: Behavior III: Motor performance Invited speaker: John Krakauer; 2 accepted talks 3:45 pm Session 9: Reward: Learning and prediction Invited speaker: Yael
    [Show full text]
  • Peromyscus Mice As a Model for Studying Natural Variation
    FEATURE ARTICLE elifesciences.org THE NATURAL HISTORY OF MODEL ORGANISMS Peromyscus mice as a model for studying natural variation Abstract The deer mouse (genus Peromyscus) is the most abundant mammal in North America, and it occupies almost every type of terrestrial habitat. It is not surprising therefore that the natural history of Peromyscus is among the best studied of any small mammal. For decades, the deer mouse has contributed to our understanding of population genetics, disease ecology, longevity, endocrinology and behavior. Over a century’s worth of detailed descriptive studies of Peromyscus in the wild, coupled with emerging genetic and genomic techniques, have now positioned these mice as model organisms for the study of natural variation and adaptation. Recent work, combining field observations and laboratory experiments, has lead to exciting advances in a number of fields—from evolution and genetics, to physiology and neurobiology. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.06813.001 NICOLE L BEDFORD AND HOPI E HOEKSTRA* Introduction from Mus and Rattus, more is known concerning Peromyscus is a genus of small North American its biology in the laboratory than any other group rodents known colloquially as deer mice (Emmons, of small mammals (Figure 1; King, 1968; 1840). When the first Peromyscus specimens were Kirkland and Layne, 1989). Several disciplines shipped to European systematicists in the late 18th including ecology, evolution, physiology, repro- century, their resemblance to the local wood ductive biology and behavioral neuroscience mouse prompted the designation Mus sylvaticus have all employed Peromyscus, inspiring its label (Hooper, 1968). At the time, little was known of as ‘the Drosophila ofNorthAmericanmammalogy’ the diversity of rodents worldwide and most were (Dewey and Dawson, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Bruno on Hoekstra
    Copyright 2019 Catherine Bruno Department of Biological Sciences Seminar Blog Seminar Date: 2/11/19 Speaker: Dr. Hopi Hoekstra—Harvard University Seminar Title: “From Darwin to DNA: Digging For Genes That Contribute To Behavior” Burrowing Beneath the Surface: Celebrating Darwin’s 210th Birthday By: Catherine Bruno (Biology PhD Student) Each year Duquesne University hosts Darwin Day in celebration of Charles Darwin’s Birthday and anniversary of On the Origin of Species. The event is an opportunity to remember the importance of science education in today’s world while discussing the impact evolutionary biology has on our lives. This year, the event hosted Dr. Hopi Hoekstra, a Professor of Zoology, Molecular and Cellular Biology and Organismic and Evolution Biology at Harvard University. To begin and honor Darwin’s 210th Birthday, Dr. Hoekstra focused on how Darwin was able to make correct theories regarding evolution as he recognized variation. Darwin noticed how offspring resemble their parents. Therefore, there must be a process for traits to be passed on to each generation. To further explore the evolutionary ideas of Darwin, science has advanced to use the genetic code to make links between genes and traits. However, many unanswered questions lie within genes and how they affect behavior. Behavioral studies can be difficult to conduct, as there are different approaches to measure behaviors within a species. It was not until the early 80’s when Richard Dawkins created the “extended phenotype” as a way to overcome a challenge amongst behavioral biologists. The concept of extended phenotype suggests that genetic traits can be responsible for behaviors.
    [Show full text]
  • A Career in Evolutionary Biology and Elucidating the Genetic Basis of Variation
    YALE JOURNAL OF BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 91 (2018), pp.513-515. Interview A Career in Evolutionary Biology and Elucidating the Genetic Basis of Variation An Interview with Hopi Hoekstra, PhD Tafadzwa L. Chaunzwaa,b,* aYale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; bHoward Hughes Medical Institute, Chevy Chase, MD Hopi E. Hoekstra, PhD, is the Alexander Agassiz Growing up I was always really interested in history, Professor of Zoology in the Departments of Organismic so actually I went to college thinking I was going to ma- and Evolutionary Biology, and Molecular and Cellular jor in political science. I think it was through just spend- Biology at Harvard University. She is a Howard Hughes ing time in the natural world that I got more and more Medical Institute investigator studying the genetic deter- interested in biology, and I realized I was less and less minants of behavior, as well as reproductive and morpho- interested in political science. When I was a sophomore, logic variation. She primarily works with wild mice as I switched and took the introductory biology classes and a model and her efforts are helping better describe the required physics and chemistry courses and so forth. genetic origins of variation in other vertebrates, including But the thing that really got me started in science was humans [1]. during that sophomore year, I took a more advanced class After graduating from the University of California in comparative physiology, and in that class we actually Berkeley with a degree in Integrative Biology, Dr. Hoek- did experiments, summarized our own data, and we did stra completed her PhD at the University of Washington, research presentations.
    [Show full text]
  • 18 June 2021 Conference Program
    100TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MAMMALOGISTS 14 – 18 JUNE 2021 -VIRTUAL MEETING- CONFERENCE PROGRAM The logo for the 100th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Mammalogists was designed by Danielle Forte. It features the pronghorn (Antilocapra americana), which is included in the official logo for the society. 100TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MAMMALOGISTS 14 – 18 JUNE 2021 -VIRTUAL MEETING- 1 AMERICAN SOCIETY OF MAMMALOGISTS (ASM) The American Society of Mammalogists (ASM) was established in 1919 for the purpose of promoting interest in the study of mammals. An Overview In addition to being among the most charismatic of animals, mammals are important in many disciplines from paleontology to ecology and evolution. We, of course, are mammals and thus are in the interesting position of studying ourselves in quest of a greater understanding of the role of mammals in the natural world. The ASM is currently composed of thousands of members, many of whom are professional scientists. Members of the Society have always had a strong interest in the public good, and this is reflected in their involvement in providing information for public policy, resources management, conservation, and education. The Society hosts annual meetings and maintains several publications. The flagship publication is the Journal of Mammalogy, a journal produced six times per year that accepts submissions on all aspects of mammalogy. The ASM also publishes Mammalian Species (accounts of individual species) and Special Publications (books that pertain to specific taxa or topics), and we maintain a mammal images library that contains many exceptional photographs of mammals.
    [Show full text]
  • Divergent Genetic Mechanisms Lead to Spiny Hair in Mammals
    bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 18, 2018; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/267385. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license. Divergent genetic mechanisms lead to spiny hair in mammals Gislene L. Gonçalves1,2*, Renan Maestri1,3, Gilson R. P. Moreira3, Marly A. M. Jacobi4, Thales R. O. Freitas 1,2, and Hopi E. Hoekstra5 1 Programa de Pós-Graduação em Genética e Biologia Molecular, Departamento de Genética, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, 91501-970, Brazil 2 Departamento de Recursos Ambientales, Facultad de Ciencias Agronómicas, Universidad de Tarapacá, Arica, Chile 3Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91501- 970, Brazil 4 Departamento de Química. Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91501-970, Brazil 5 Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Department of Molecular & Cellular Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA Corresponding author: Gislene L. Gonçalves PPGBM, Departamento de Genética Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul Porto Alegre, RS, 91501-970, Brazil (+55 51) 3308-6726 [email protected] bioRxiv preprint first posted online Feb. 18, 2018; doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1101/267385. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not peer-reviewed) is the author/funder. It is made available under a CC-BY-NC 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Meeting Update IBANGS News the International Behavioural
    Issue 6 Winter 2019 IBANGS News The International Behavioural and Neural Genetics Society Highlights of the meeting program at this stage: Annual Meeting Update Organization of the annual meeting is in hyperdrive. The committees are hard at work laying the foundation for a week of amazing science, training and networking opportunities. Check it out! Genes, Brain, and Behavior, May 12-17, 2020. Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, MA. USA. Highlights of the meeting program at this stage Satellite Meeting: Junior Scientists Career Development Day Young and Distinguished Investigator Award: Lectures and Ceremony Society Fellow Ceremony: Appointment based on scientific excellence and society involvement [Recipients for 2019: Richard E. Brown, Elissa J. Chesler, John C. Crabbe, Jacqueline N. Crawley, Wim E. Crusio, Hans-Peter Lipp, Abraham A. Palmer, Catharine H. Rankin, Hee-sup Shin, Douglas Wahlsten, and Robert W. Williams] Special Lecture: Hopi Hoekstra, Evolution, Genetics, and Neurobiology of Mice and Molecules, Harvard University USA Presidential Lecture: Jonathan Mill, Complex Disease Epigenetics, University of Exeter, UK Session Titles Alternate transcript usage and RNA splicing in alcohol and substance use disorders Sleep regulation and function during early developmental periods Neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome in mice and humans Neurodegenerative and Neuropsychiatric disorders Emergent systems for genetic studies of behavior 1 Download the meeting flyer to share with your colleagues: Genes, Brain and Behavior 2020 Meeting Flyer Important Date: Jan 7, 2020 Meeting Registration, Abstract Submission, and Call for Travel Award Applications Open. An email reminder will be sent beforehand. Satellite Meeting Update The Behaviour Satellite Meeting at the FENS Forum of Neuroscience is an excellent opportunity for IBANGS members to make new connections with scientists abroad.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Our Evolution Cases “Genestoproteinstoselectablephenotype” Approach of Website (
    White et al. Evolution: Education and Outreach 2013, 6:17 http://www.evolution-outreach.com/content/6/1/17 COMMENTARY Open Access Integrative cases for teaching evolution Peter JT White1*, Merle Heidemann2, Miles Loh3 and James J Smith1 Abstract Current university-level evolution instruction often suffers from a disjointed curriculum that separates molecular and ecological processes, at times omitting the former altogether. At the same time, national reform efforts call for the principles of evolution to be taught across the curriculum. We met this challenge by developing four cases (Mouse Fur Color, Pea Taste, Monkey Opsins and Clam Toxin) that present an integrated, comprehensive approach to teaching evolution across biological sub-disciplines. Our intent was to provide materials that post-secondary instructors could use to bolster their content knowledge and adapt for their students as they endeavor to configure their teaching to meet Vision and Change challenges. The material in any given case can be used to support the teaching of evolution across the curriculum, whether within a single introductory or advanced course, or more comprehensively across several courses. The cases are presented in a way that will allow instructors to quickly see how to apply this approach. Keywords: Evolution, Evolution education, Integrative science, Science education, Case studies Background their understanding of gene expression and the role(s) of The problem: how can we help students understand proteins in building and maintaining cells and organisms. evolution across biological scales? It follows that connections of cell functions to evolution, As professional biologists, we know that the ability to in- considered by students to be related to ecology but not tegrate information and concepts across scales is critical cells, are not considered.
    [Show full text]
  • C. R. Linnen 1
    C. R. Linnen Curriculum Vitae CATHERINE RAMSAY LINNEN Address: Department of Biology 200A Thomas Hunt Morgan Building University of Kentucky Lexington, KY 40506-0225 Tel: (617) 970-7717 Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.uky.edu/~cli242/Linnen_Lab/Home.html Current Position: 2011- Assistant Professor Department of Biology, University of Kentucky Education: 2000-2007 Ph.D. in Organismic and Evolutionary Biology Harvard University; Advisor: Dr. Brian Farrell 1996-2000 B.S. in Ecology (Summa Cum Laude, Highest Honors, GPA: 4.0) University of Georgia; Advisors: Dr. Mark Hunter and Dr. Daniel Promislow Research Interests: Genetics of adaptation and speciation Molecular basis of morphological change Speciation ecology and biogeography Phylogenomics and comparative methods Ecological and population genomics Professional Experience: 2011- Assistant Professor Department of Biology, University of Kentucky 2010-2011 Research Associate Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University PI: Dr. Hopi Hoekstra 2007-2010 Ruth L. Kirschstein NIH–NRSA Postdoctoral Fellow Department of Organismic & Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University PI: Dr. Hopi Hoekstra 2005-2006 Teaching Assistant, General Biology Harvard University Summer School (2 summer sessions) 2005-2006 Teaching Assistant, General Biology Harvard University Extension School (fall and spring sessions) 2001-2002 Teaching Fellow, Animal Behavior, Harvard University 2001 Teaching Fellow, Ecology, Harvard University 1 C. R. Linnen 2000-2001 Teaching Fellow, Organismal
    [Show full text]
  • Prix Richard Lounsbery
    PRIX RICHARD LOUNSBERY LISTE RECAPITULATIVE DES LAUREATS 1979 MM. S. BROWN, Directeur du Center of Genetic Disease de l'Université du Texas et J.L. GOLDSTEIN, Chef du Département de Génétique moléculaire de l'Université du Texas, pour leur travail sur la biosynthèse du cholestérol. 1980 M. François MOREL, Professeur au Collège de France, pour ses travaux sur la Physiologie du rein. 1981 M. Philip LEDER, Chef de Laboratoire de Génétique moléculaire, NICHHD, pour ses travaux concernant la Génétique moléculaire. 1982 MM. Pierre CHAMBON, Professeur à l'Institut de Chimie biologique de la Faculté de Médecine de Strasbourg, et Jean-Pierre CHANGEUX, Professeur à l'Institut Pasteur de Paris, pour leur travaux sur les structures fondamentales du matériel génétique et du système nerveux. 1983 M. Gunter BLOBEL, Professeur de Biologie cellulaire à la Rockefeller University, pour ses découvertes des interactions moléculaires qui contrôlent le trafic des protéines nouvellement synthétisées dans les cellules eukaryotes. 1984 M. Maxime SCHWARTZ, Professeur à l'Institut Pasteur de Paris, pour son analyse génétique et biochimique du système maltose d'E. Coli qui a permis de résoudre une série de problèmes fondamentaux en biologie moléculaire. 1985 MM. Martin GELLERT, Chief, Section on Metabolic Enzymes, Laboratoire de Biologie moléculaire, National Institute of Arthrisis, Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institute of Health, et Tom MANIATIS, Professeur de Biochimie et Biologie moléculaire à l'Université de Harvard, pour leurs contributions à notre compréhension de la structure et des fonctions de l'ADN. 1986 MM. André CAPRON, Professeur à l'Institut Pasteur de Lille, et Jacques GLOWINSKI, Professeur au Collège de France, pour leurs travaux fondamentaux contribuant aux traitements des maladies parasitaires et neurologiques de l'homme.
    [Show full text]