The Founding of the Ryerson Institute of Technology 1
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Tall Buildings: up up and Away?
expect the best Tall Buildings: Up Up and Away? by Marc Kemerer Originally published in Blaneys on Building (April 2011) There has been much debate about tall buildings (buildings over 12 storeys in height) in Toronto in the past number of years particularly due to the decreasing availability of development land, and the province and municipal forces on intensification – but how tall is too tall and where should tall buildings be permitted? Marc Kemerer is a municipal As we have reported previously, the City of Toronto continues to review proposals for tall towers partner at Blaney McMurtry , against its Tall Buildings Guidelines which set out standards for podiums, setbacks between sister with significant experience in towers and the like. Some of those Guidelines were incorporated into the City’s new comprehensive all aspects of municipal planning and development. zoning by-law (under appeal and subject to possible repeal by City Council - see the Planning Updates section of this issue) while the Guidelines themselves were renewed last year by City Marc may be reached directly Council for continued use in design review. at 416.593.2975 or [email protected]. Over the last couple of years the City has embarked on the “second phase” of its tall buildings review through the “Tall Buildings Downtown Project”. In connection with this phase, the City has recently released the study commissioned by the City on this topic entitled: “Tall Buildings: Inviting Change in Downtown Toronto” (the “Study”). The Study focused on three issues: where should tall buildings be located; how high should tall buildings be; and how should tall buildings behave in their context. -
Digital Learning in Canadian Higher Education in 2020
Digital Learning in Canadian Higher Education in 2020 Ontario Report Report Author: Dr. Nicole Johnson Research Director, Canadian Digital Learning Research Association Research Team: Dr. Nicole Johnson Research Director, Canadian Digital Learning Research Association Dr. Jeff Seaman Director, Bay View Analytics and Director of Analytics, Canadian Digital Learning Research Association Dr. George Veletsianos Professor & Canada Research Chair in Innovative Learning and Technology, Royal Roads University Canadian Digital Learning Research Association Association canadienne de recherche sur la formation en ligne ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The National Survey of Online and Digital Learning is made possible with the support of our sponsors. The primary funding agencies for the 2020 CDLRA research initiatives were: eCampusOntario, BCcampus, Campus Manitoba, Contact North, OCAS, Pearson Canada, and D2L. We thank Dr. George Veletsianos for his work on the Canadian Pulse Project surveys, which contributed to the findings presented in this report. We also thank the following organizations for their support: Colleges and Institutes Canada (CICAN) and Universities Canada. In addition, we thank Carole Freynet-Gagné and her team for their translation services that enabled the bilingual production of the 2020 CDLRA reports and presentations. We also thank Rachel Sumner, the eCampusOntario/CDLRA Liaison for her support in arranging interviews with senior administrators in Ontario and for her feedback on the Ontario report. Most importantly, we thank our survey -
Academic Transformation: the Forces Reshaping Higher Education in Ontario
An agency of the Government of Ontario Ian D. Clark, Greg Moran, Michael L. Skolnik, and David Trick. Academic Transformation: The Forces Reshaping Higher Education in Ontario. Montreal and Kingston: Queen’s Policy Studies Series, McGill-Queen’s University Press, 2009. The book is available for purchase at http://mqup.mcgill.ca/book.php?bookid=2363 (English only). The thesis of this book is that the present approach to the provision of baccalaureate education in Ontario is not sustainable and is in need of significant modification. The stage for the present approach was set by two higher education policy decisions that were made in the 1960s: (1) that the colleges would have no role in the provision of baccalaureate credit activity; and (2) that the publicly supported universities would have complete autonomy in deciding on their purpose, mission, and objectives. While the universities had been primarily teaching institutions until the 1960s, since then a single idea of the mission of the university—the research university—has been adopted by all. A key element of the research university model to which the university community in Ontario has subscribed is that of the teacher-researcher ideal: that undergraduate students should be taught only by professors who are active researchers. Not only have all the universities embraced the research university model, but in the past two decades there has been a growing expectation from the public and the government for universities to produce knowledge that will enhance Canada’s economic well-being and international economic competitiveness. This new model has fostered substantial growth in university research, brought changes to the traditional research paradigm, and introduced new costs—both human and financial. -
Schedule 4 Description of Views
SCHEDULE 4 DESCRIPTION OF VIEWS This schedule describes the views identified on maps 7a and 7b of the Official Plan. Views described are subject to the policies set out in section 3.1.1. Described views marked with [H] are views of heritage properties and are specifically subject to the view protection policies of section 3.1.5 of the Official Plan. A. PROMINENT AND HERITAGE BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES & LANDSCAPES A1. Queens Park Legislature [H] This view has been described in a comprehensive study and is the subject of a site and area specific policy of the Official Plan. It is not described in this schedule. A2. Old City Hall [H] The view of Old City hall includes the main entrance, tower and cenotaph as viewed from the southwest and southeast corners at Temperance Street and includes the silhouette of the roofline and clock tower. This view will also be the subject of a comprehensive study. A3. Toronto City Hall [H] The view of City Hall includes the east and west towers, the council chamber and podium of City Hall and the silhouette of those features as viewed from the north side of Queen Street West along the edge of the eastern half of Nathan Phillips Square. This view will be the subject of a comprehensive study. A4. Knox College Spire [H] The view of the Knox College Spire, as it extends above the roofline of the third floor, can be viewed from the north along Spadina Avenue at the southeast corner of Bloor Street West and at Sussex Avenue. A5. -
PATH Network
A B C D E F G Ryerson TORONTO University 1 1 PATH Toronto Atrium 10 Dundas Coach Terminal on Bay East DUNDAS ST W St Patrick DUNDAS ST W NETWORK Dundas Ted Rogers School One Dundas Art Gallery of Ontario of Management West Yonge-Dundas About the PATH Square 2 2 Welcome to the PATH — Toronto’s Downtown Underground Pedestrian Walkway UNIVERSITY AVE linking 30 kilometres of underground shopping, services and entertainment ST PATRICK ST BEVERLEY ST BEVERLEY ST M M c c CAUL ST CAUL ST Toronto Marriott Downtown Eaton VICTORIA ST Centre YONGE ST BAY ST Map directory BAY ST A 11 Adelaide West F6 One King West G7 130 Adelaide West D5 One Queen Street East G4 Eaton Tower Adelaide Place C5 One York D11 150 York St P PwC Tower D10 3 Toronto 3 Atrium on Bay F1 City Hall 483 Bay Street Q 2 Queen Street East G4 B 222 Bay E7 R RBC Centre B8 DOWNTOWN Bay Adelaide Centre F5 155 Wellington St W YONGE Bay Wellington Tower F8 RBC WaterPark Place E11 Osgoode UNIVERSITY AVE 483 Bay Richmond-Adelaide Centre D5 UNIVERSITY AVE Hall F3 BAY ST 120 Adelaide St W BAY ST CF Toronto Bremner Tower / C10 Nathan Eaton Centre Southcore Financial Centre (SFC) 85 Richmond West E5 Phillips Canada Life Square Brookfield Place F8 111 Richmond West D5 Building 4 Old City Hall 4 2 Queen Street East C Cadillac Fairview Tower F4 Roy Thomson Hall B7 Cadillac Fairview Royal Bank Building F6 Tower CBC Broadcast Centre A8 QUEEN ST W Osgoode QUEEN ST W Thomson Queen Building Simpson Tower CF Toronto Eaton Centre F4 Royal Bank Plaza North Tower E8 QUEEN STREET One Queen 200 Bay St Four -
Early Childhood Educators, Teachers, and Racial Socialization in Full-Day Kindergarten Zuhra Abawi
JOURNAL OF CHILDHOOD STUDIES ARTICLES FROM RESEARCH Privileging Power: Early Childhood Educators, Teachers, and Racial Socialization in Full-Day Kindergarten Zuhra Abawi Dr. Zuhra Abawi is an assistant professor of education at Niagara University, Ontario. Her work focuses on the ways that discourses of race and identity are negotiated, mediated, and socialized in education. Her research seeks to recenter the voices of racialized and Indigenous children, families, and educators by problematizing whiteness and Eurocentric developmentalist discourses and curricula embedded in educational institutions. Email: [email protected] While there has been extensive research pertaining This paper critically unpacks the racialized and toward the importance of diversifying the teacher gendered hierarchies between the co-teaching model of workforce in order to represent student diversity early childhood educators (ECEs) and Ontario certified and provide equitable and inclusive education teachers (OCTs) in full-day kindergarten (FDK), and (e.g., Abawi, 2018; Abawi & Eizadirad, 2020; how such positionalities speak to racial socialization James & Turner, 2017; Ryan, Pollock, & Antonelli, in early learning spaces. While young children and 2009; Turner Consulting Group, 2015), there is early learning spaces are often portrayed as raceless, limited study on the racialized power relations ahistorical, and apolitical, extant literature suggests informing the relationship between the co- that children as young as two years of age are aware teaching team of early -
The Politicization of the Scarborough Rapid Transit Line in Post-Suburban Toronto
THE ‘TOONERVILLE TROLLEY’: THE POLITICIZATION OF THE SCARBOROUGH RAPID TRANSIT LINE IN POST-SUBURBAN TORONTO Peter Voltsinis 1 “The world is watching.”1 A spokesperson for the Province of Ontario’s (the Province) Urban Transportation Development Corporation (UTDC) uttered those poignant words on March 21, 1985, one day before the Toronto Transit Commission’s (TTC) inaugural opening of the Scarborough Rapid Transit (SRT) line.2 One day later, Ontario Deputy Premier Robert Welch gave the signal to the TTC dispatchers to send the line’s first trains into the Scarborough Town Centre Station, proclaiming that it was “a great day for Scarborough and a great day for public transit.”3 For him, the SRT was proof that Ontario can challenge the world.4 This research essay outlines the development of the SRT to carve out an accurate place for the infrastructure project in Toronto’s planning history. I focus on the SRT’s development chronology, from the moment of the Spadina Expressway’s cancellation in 1971 to the opening of the line in 1985. Correctly classifying what the SRT represents in Toronto’s planning history requires a clear vision of how the project emerged. To create that image, I first situate my research within Toronto’s dominant historiographical planning narratives. I then synthesize the processes and phenomena, specifically postmodern planning and post-suburbanization, that generated public transit alternatives to expressway development in Toronto in the 1970s. Building on my synthesis, I present how the SRT fits into that context and analyze the changing landscape of Toronto land-use politics in the 1970s and early-1980s. -
James T. Lemon Fonds
University of Toronto Archives and Records Management Services James T. Lemon Fonds Prepared by: Marnee Gamble Nov. 1995 Revised Nov. 2005 Revised Nov 2016 © University of Toronto Archives and Records Management Services 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE…………………………………………………………………………1 SCOPE AND CONTENT………………………………………………………………………...2 Series 1 Biographical……………………………………………………………………….3 Series 2 Correspondence…………………………………………………………………...3 Series 3 Conferences and speaking engagements…………………………………………...4 Series 4 Publishing Activities………………………………………………………………4 Series 5 Reviews…………………………………………………………………………...5 Series 6 Research Grants…………………………………………………………………..5 Series 7 Teaching Files……………………………………………………………………..5 Series 8 Student Files………………………………………………………………………6 Series 9 References………………………………………………………………………...6 Series 10 Department of Geography………………………………………………………..7 Series 11 University of Toronto…………………………………………………………….7 Series 12 Professional Associations and Community Groups………………………………8 Series 13 New Democratic Party…………………………………………………………...8 Series 14 Christian Youth Groups………………………………………………………….8 Series 15 Family Papers…………………………………………………………………….9 Appendix 1 Series 12: Professional Associations and Community Groups 10 Appendix 2 Series 7 : Teaching student essays B1984-0027, B1986-0015, B1988-0054 12 University of Toronto Archives James T. Lemon Fonds BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE: Raised in West Lorne, Ontario, James (Jim) Thomas Lemon attended the University of Western Ontario where he received his Bachelor of Arts in Geography (1955). He later attended the University of Wisconsin where he received a Master of Science in Geography (1961) as well as his Ph.D. (1964). In 1967, after having worked as an Assistant Professor at the University of California, Prof. Lemon joined the University of Toronto Geography Department, where he remained until his retirement in 1994. His career has been spent in the field of urban historical geography of which he has written numerous articles, papers and chapters in books. -
390 Bay Street
Ground Floor & PATH Retail for Lease 390 Bay Street Eric Berard Sales Representative 647.528.0461 [email protected] RETAIL FOR LEASE 390 BAY ST 390 Bay Street CITY HALL OLD CITY EATON - CENTRE N.P. SQUARE HALL Queen St FOUR SEASONS CENTRE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS University Ave Richmond St Wine Academy Bay St Bay York St York Yonge St Yonge Sheppard St Sheppard Church St Church Adelaide St FIRST CANADIAN PLACE SCOTIA PLAZA King St TORONTO DOMINION CENTRE COMMERCE COURT WALRUS PUB Wellington St ROYAL BANK BROOKFIELD PLAZA PLACE View facing south from Old City Hall OVERVIEW DEMOGRAPHICS (3KM, 2020) 390 Bay St. (Munich RE Centre) is located at northwest corner 702,631 of Bay St. and Richmond St. W within Toronto’s Financial Core. DAYTIME POPULATION It is a BOMA BEST Gold certified 378,984 sf A-Class office tower, with PATH connected retail. 390 Bay is well located with connec- $ $114,002 tivity to The Sheraton Centre, Hudson’s Bay Company/Saks Fifth AVG. HOUSEHOLD INCOME Avenue, Toronto Eaton Centre and direct proximity to Nathan Phillips Square and Toronto City Hall. Full renovations have been 182,265 completed to update the Lobby and PATH level retail concourse. HOUSEHOLDS RETAIL FOR LEASE 390 Bay Street "Client" Tenant Usable Area Major Vertical Penetration Floor Common Area Building Common Area UP DN UP DN Version: Prepared: 30/08/2016 UP FP2A Measured: 01/05/2019 390 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario 100 Floor 1 FHC ELEV GROUND FLOOR AVAILABILITY DN ELEC. UP ROOM ELEV ELEV DN Please Refer to Corresponding ELEV MECH. -
Forced Segregation of Black Students in Canada West Public Schools and Myths of British Egalitarianism
— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — “We had no desire to be set apart”: Forced Segregation of Black Students in Canada West Public Schools and Myths of British Egalitarianism KRISTIN McLAREN* The practice of school segregation in mid-nineteenth-century Canada West defied popular images of the province as a guardian of British moral and egalitarian ideals. African Canadians in Canada West found themselves excluded from public education or forced into segregation, practices that were against the spirit if not the letter of British and Canadian law. Education laws were changed to accommodate racism, while guardians of the education system tolerated illegal discriminatory practices. A number of historians have described the emergence of segregated racial schools in Canada West as a response to requests by black people to be sepa- rate; however, historical evidence contradicts this assertion. African Canadians in the mid-nineteenth century fought against segregation and refused to be set apart. Numerous petitions to the Education Department complained of exclusion from common schools and expressed desires for integration, not segregation. When black people did open their own schools, children of all ethnic backgrounds were welcome in these institutions. La politique de ségrégation scolaire que l’on pratiquait dans l’Ouest canadien du milieu du XIXe siècle contredit l’image populaire de gardienne des idéaux moraux et égalitaires britanniques que l’on se faisait de la province. Les Afro-Canadiens de l’Ouest canadien étaient privés d’enseignement public ou ségrégués, des pratiques qui allaient à l’encontre de l’esprit sinon de la lettre du droit britannique et cana- dien. Les lois sur l’enseignement ont été modifiées pour laisser place au racisme, tandis que les gardiens du système d’éducation toléraient des pratiques discrimina- toires illicites. -
2018 Architecture Program Report (APR)
Architecture Program Report September 2018 Table of Contents 1.1 Program Identity and Mission 1 1.2 Program Action Plan and Objectives 7 2 Progress Since the Previous Site Visit 13 3.1 Program Self-Assessment 21 3.2 Public Information 45 3.3 Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion 51 3.4 Student Composition, Well-Being, and Enrichment 59 3.5 Faculty and Staff Resources 79 3.6 Space and Technology Resources 95 3.7 Information Resources and Information Technology 107 3.8 Financial Resources 113 3.9 Administrative Structure 119 3.10 Professional Degrees and Curriculum 123 3.11 Student Performance Criteria (SPC) 135 4.1.1 History, Description, and Mission of the Institution 157 4.1.2 Program History 163 4.2 Student Progress Evaluation 165 4.3 Current Course Descriptions 177 4.4 Current Faculty Resumes 225 4.5 Visiting Team Report from the Previous Visit 285 4.6 Annual Reports 319 4.7 Studio SPC Targets Not Met 372 4.8 Library Report, Architecture (M.Arch) 374 Ryerson University Department of Architectural Science Architecture Programme Report September 2018 Table of Contents 1.1 Program Identity The Department of Architectural Science (DAS) has a long history of offering education for the AEC and Mission (Architectural, Engineering and Construction) Industry, and has championed the teaching of architectural science for over 60 years. The department prides itself on a close connection to industry, with many Accreditation requires an understanding graduates having gone on to significant careers in design, construction, and/or development. The of the specific scholastic identity and department’s programs embrace a comprehensive vision of architecture as a social, technical, political, and mission of the Program. -
The Untold History of Museum Education at the Royal Ontario Museum Kate Zankowicz
Document generated on 09/25/2021 6:38 a.m. Ontario History In Search of Ruth Home The Untold History of Museum Education at the Royal Ontario Museum Kate Zankowicz Women and Education Article abstract Volume 107, Number 1, Spring 2015 Ruth Home developed the education department at the Royal Ontario Museum from 1928-1945. She was an important figure in the history of the museum, and URI: https://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1050679ar more broadly, in the history of museum-based education in the province. She DOI: https://doi.org/10.7202/1050679ar played a major role in expanding museum audiences and developed programming that was geared towards what were then considered women’s See table of contents interests and worked to connect the museum to schoolchildren and teachers. This paper analyses Home’s career as a means of offering insight into the early gendered dynamics of museum education and exploring the origins of many of the programs we currently associate with museum education today. Publisher(s) The Ontario Historical Society ISSN 0030-2953 (print) 2371-4654 (digital) Explore this journal Cite this article Zankowicz, K. (2015). In Search of Ruth Home: The Untold History of Museum Education at the Royal Ontario Museum. Ontario History, 107(1), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.7202/1050679ar Copyright © The Ontario Historical Society, 2015 This document is protected by copyright law. Use of the services of Érudit (including reproduction) is subject to its terms and conditions, which can be viewed online. https://apropos.erudit.org/en/users/policy-on-use/ This article is disseminated and preserved by Érudit.