DOCSLIB.ORG

Soortenlijst Sprinkhanen En Krekels België

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Soortenlijst Sprinkhanen En Krekels België Voorlopige atlas en "rode lijst" van de sprinkhanen en krekels van België (Insecta, Orthoptera) Atlas et "liste rouge" provisoire des sauterelles, grillons et criquets de Belgique (Insecta, Orthoptera) Kris Decleer1 Hendrik Devriese2 Kurt Hofmans3 Koen Lock4 Brigitte Barenbrug5 Dirk Maes1 SALTABEL, sprinkhanenwerkgroep van de Benelux i.s.m. Instituut voor Natuurbehoud Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen Rapport I.N.2000/10 Augustus 2000 1 Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, Kliniekstraat 25, 1070 Brussel 2 Koninklijk Belgisch Instituut voor Natuurwetenschappen, Dep. Entomologie, Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussel 3 Centre Marie Victorin, Rue des Ecoles 21, 5670 Vierves-sur-Viroin 4 Universiteit Gent, Laboratorium voor Milieutoxicologie en Aquatische Ecologie, J. Plateaustraat 22, 9000 Gent 5 Cercles des Naturalistes de Belgique, Section ENTOMOS, Rue Roche Madoux 4, 5670 Vierves-sur-Viroin Colofon Tekst / Texte Kris Decleer, Hendrik Devriese, Kurt Hofmans, Koen Lock, Dirk Maes Tekening voorpagina / Dessin première page Harry Wijnhoven (Gryllus campestris : Veldkrekel, Le Grillon des champs) Eindredactie en lay-out / Rédaction définitive et mise en page Kris Decleer, Sophie Vanroose, Dirk Maes Druk / Impression Ministerie van de Vlaamse Gemeenschap, Departement LIN AAD, Afd. Logistiek – Digitale drukkerij Oplage / Tirage 300 ex. Wijze van citeren / Citation Decleer, K., Devriese, H., Hofmans, K., Lock, K., Barenbrug, B. & Maes D., 2000. Voorlopige atlas en "rode lijst" van de sprinkhanen en krekels van België (Insecta, Orthoptera). Werkgroep Saltabel i.s.m. I.N. en K.B.I.N., Rapport Instituut voor Natuurbehoud 2000/10, Brussel, 76 p. / Atlas et "liste rouge" provisoire des sauterelles, grillons et criquets de Belgique (Insecta, Orthoptera). Groupe de travail Saltabel e.c.a. I.N. et I.R.S.N.B., Rapport Instituut voor Natuurbehoud 2000/10, Bruxelles, 76 p. D/2000/3241/216 ISBN 90-403-0119-0 NUGI 825 Kostprijs / Prix d'achat Gratis voor Saltabel-medewerkers / gratuit pour collaborateurs de Saltabel Overige / autres : 200 BEF (4,95 €) Hoe bestellen ? / Comment faire une commande ? Stuur een briefje of e-mailbericht naar / poste une lettre ou un e-mail à - Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, Helen Blow, Kliniekstraat 25, 1070 Brussel ([email protected]) - Saltabel p/a K.B.I.N., Dept. Entomologie, Vautierstraat 29, 1000 Brussel ([email protected]) Instituut voor Natuurbehoud, Brussel Instituut voor Natuurbehoud Kliniekstraat 25, B-1070 Brussel E-mail : [email protected] Internet : http://www.instnat.be Tel. +32 (0)2 558 18 11 Fax. +32 (0)2 558 18 05 Inhoud / Table de matières Woord vooraf / Préface....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Materiaal en methode / Matériel et méthode ...................................................................................................................... 7 Verzoek om medewerking /Appel aux collaborateurs........................................................................................................ 8 Lijst van waarnemers / Liste d’observateurs ...................................................................................................................... 9 Checklist van de sprinkhanen en krekels in België / Liste synoptique des criquets, sauterelles et grillons en Belgique.. 10 Voorlopige kaartjes en bespreking van de soorten / Cartes provisoires et discussion des espèces: Sabelsprinkhanen - Tettigoniidae - Sauterelles Sikkelsprinkhaan – Phaneroptera falcata (PODA, 1761) – Le Phanéroptère commun............................................. 11 Zaagsprinkhaan – Barbitistes serricauda (FABRICIUS, 1798) – Le Barbitiste des bois ............................................. 12 Struiksprinkhaan – Leptophyes punctatissima (BOSC, 1792) – La Sauterelle ponctuée............................................ 13 Boomsprinkhaan – Meconema thalassinum (DEGEER, 1773) – La Sauterelle des chênes ........................................ 14 Zuidelijke boomsprinkhaan – Meconema meridionale (COSTA, 1860) – Le Méconème fragile............................... 15 Gewoon spitskopje – Conocephalus dorsalis (LATREILLE, 1804) – Le Conocéphale des roseaux ........................... 16 Zuidelijk spitskopje – Conocephalus discolor (THUNBERG, 1815) – Le Conocéphale bigarré ................................. 17 Grote groene sabelsprinkhaan – Tettigonia viridissima (LINNAEUS, 1758) – La Grande sauterelle verte................. 18 Kleine groene sabelsprinkhaan – Tettigonia cantans (FUESSLY, 1775) – La Sauterelle cymbalière......................... 19 Wrattenbijter – Decticus verrucivorus (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Dectique verrucivore.............................................. 20 Kleine wrattenbijter – Gampsocleis glabra (HERBST, 1786) – Le Dectique des brandes.......................................... 21 Duinsabelsprinkhaan – Platycleis albopunctata (GOEZ, 1778) – La Decticelle chagrinée........................................ 22 Dobbelsteensprinkhaan – Platycleis tessellata (CHARPENTIER, 1825) – La Decticelle carroyée .............................. 23 Heidesabelsprinkhaan – Metrioptera brachyptera (LINNAEUS, 1761) – La Decticelle des bruyères ........................ 24 Lichtgroene sabelsprinkhaan – Metrioptera bicolor (PHILIPPI, 1830) – La Decticelle bicolore................................ 25 Greppelsprinkhaan – Metrioptera roeselii (HAGENBACH, 1822) – La Decticelle bariolée........................................ 26 Bramensprinkhaan – Pholidoptera griseoaptera (DEGEER, 1773) – La Decticelle cendrée...................................... 27 Zadelsprinkhaan – Ephippiger ephippiger (SERVILLE, 1831) – L’Ephippigère des vignes....................................... 28 Krekels - Gryllidae - Grillons Veldkrekel – Gryllus campestris (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Grillon des champs ......................................................... 29 Huiskrekel – Acheta domesticus (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Grillon domestique.......................................................... 30 Boskrekel – Nemobius sylvestris (BOSC, 1792) – Le Grillon des bois ...................................................................... 31 Boomkrekel – Oecanthus pellucens (SCOPOLI, 1763) – Le Grillon d’Italie .............................................................. 32 Veenmollen - Gryllotalpidae - Courtilières Veenmol – Gryllotalpa gryllotalpa (LINNAEUS, 1758) – La Courtilière commune .................................................. 33 Doornsprinkhanen - Tetrigidae - Tétrix Zeggedoorntje – Tetrix subulata (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Tétrix subulé.................................................................... 34 Zanddoorntje – Tetrix ceperoi (BOLIVAR, 1887) – Le Tétrix des vasières................................................................ 35 Gewoon doorntje – Tetrix undulata (SOWERBY, 1806) – Le Tétrix des clairières .................................................... 36 Bosdoorntje – Tetrix bipunctata (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Tétrix calcicole ................................................................ 37 Kalkdoorntje – Tetrix tenuicornis (SAHLBERG, 1893) – Le Tétrix des carrières ....................................................... 38 Echte veldsprinkhanen - Acrididae - Acridides Rosevleugel – Calliptamus italicus (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Criquet italien ............................................................. 39 Klappersprinkhaan – Psophus stridulus (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Criquet stridulant ................................................. 40 Europese treksprinkhaan – Locusta migratoria (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Criquet migrateur ..................................... 41 Blauwvleugelsprinkhaan – Oedipoda caerulescens (LINNAEUS, 1758) – L’Oedipode bleue.................................... 42 Roodvleugelsprinkhaan – Oedipoda germanica (LATREILLE, 1804) – L'Oedipode rouge........................................ 43 Kiezelsprinkhaan – Sphingonotus caerulans (LINNAEUS, 1767) – L’Oedipode azurée............................................. 44 Moerassprinkhaan – Stethophyma grossum (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Criquet ensanglanté........................................ 45 Gouden sprinkhaan – Chrysochraon dispar (GERMAR, 1835) – Le Criquet des clairières........................................ 46 Kleine goudsprinkhaan – Euthystira brachyptera (OCSKAY, 1826) – Le Criquet des genévriers............................. 47 Zoemertje – Stenobothrus lineatus (PANZER, 1796) – Le Criquet ligné.................................................................... 48 Schavertje – Stenobothrus stigmaticus (RAMBUR, 1839) – Le Sténobothre nain ...................................................... 49 Wekkertje – Omocestus viridulus (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Criquet verdelet ............................................................. 50 Voorlopige atlas en "rode lijst" van de sprinkhanen en krekels van België, Rapport I.N. 2000/10 3 Atlas et "liste rouge" provisoire des sauterelles, grillons et criquets de Belgique, Rapport I.N. 2000/10 Negertje – Omocestus rufipes (ZETTERSTEDT, 1821) – Le Criquet noir-ébène ......................................................... 51 Steppesprinkhaan – Chorthippus vagans (EVERSMANN, 1848) – Le Criquet des pins.............................................. 52 Bruine sprinkhaan – Chorthippus brunneus (THUNBERG, 1815) – Le Criquet duettiste ........................................... 53 Ratelaar – Chorthippus biguttulus (LINNAEUS, 1758) – Le Criquet mélodieux .......................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Articulata 2012 27 (1/2): 17௅28 Zoogeographie
    © Deutsche Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V.; download http://www.dgfo-articulata.de/; www.zobodat.at ARTICULATA 2012 27 (1/2): 17௅28 ZOOGEOGRAPHIE Small scale ecological zoogeographic methods in explanation of the distribution patterns of grasshoppers Kenyeres, Z., & Rácz, I.A. Abstract We examined in this study, in a Central-European low mountain range, whether methods of ecological zoogeography can explain better the distribution patterns of grasshopper species and species-groups, than the methods of the historical zoogeography. Our results showed that zoogeographically defined microregions could be specified more precisely by the distribution of species groups of differ- ent eco-types than the distribution of species groups of the different faunal-types. We found that the macroclimate elements and landscape features determine the regional distribution patterns of the orthopteran species and species-groups with similar thermal and humidity requirements. Our case study revealed the impor- tant role of the ecological zoogeography in zoogeographical analyses of Orthop- tera fauna at small geographical scale. Zusammenfassung Wir haben untersucht, ob man mit ökologisch-tiergeographischen Methoden die Verteilungsmuster von Heuschrecken in einem mitteleuropäischen Mittelgebirge analysieren kann. Unsere Ergebnisse zeigen, dass die Unterschiede auf dem Niveau der Mikroregion bei den Heuschrecken nicht in den Fauna-Typen, son- dern in der Verteilung von Tierarten bzw. Tiergruppen mit unterschiedlichen öko- logischen Ansprüchen zu finden sind. Wir können somit die Elemente des Makro- klimas und die Merkmale der Landschaft identifizieren, die das lokale Vertei- lungsmuster von Artengruppen mit ähnlichen ökologischen Ansprüchen, bezie- hungsweise von bestimmten Tierarten bestimmen. Introduction Questions and methodology in the biogeographical searching have been domi- nated by the conceptions of the historical biogeography for a long time.
    [Show full text]
  • Recognition of a Two-Element Song in the Grasshopper <Emphasis Type="Italic">Chorthippus Dorsatus</Emphasis&G
    J Comp Physiol A (1992) 171:405-412 Joul~l of Comparative .....,, Physiology A ~%", Springer-Verlag 1992 Recognition of a two-element song in the grasshopper Chorthippus dorsatus (Orthoptera: Gomphocerinae) Andreas Stumpner 1 and Otto von Helversen Institut fiir Zoologie II, Friedrich-Alexander Universit~it Erlangen-Nfirnberg, Staudtstr. 5, W 8520 Erlangen, FRG Accepted June 6, 1992 Summary. Males of the grasshopper Chorthippus dor- by the second note "qui" (Narins and Capranica 1976, satus produce songphrases which contain two differently 1978). Calling songs of the cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus structured elements - pulsed syllables in the first part (A) also consist of two distinctly different elements, "chirp" and ongoing noise in the second part (B). Females of Ch. and "trill". T. oceanicus females prefer song models com- dorsatus answer to artificial song models only if both prising chirps but no trills over 100% trill models, while elements A and B are present. Females strongly prefer males show the reversed preference (Pollack and Hoy song models in which the order of elements is A preced- 1979, 1981; Pollack 1982). Also, in the seventeen-year ing B. Females discriminate between the two elements cicada Magicicada cassini the first calling song element mainly by the existence of gaps within A-syllables. Pulses "tick" obviously is used for synchronizing male chorus- of 5-8 ms separated by gaps of 8-15 ms make most ing, while the second element "buzz" effectively elicits effective A-syllables, while syllable duration and syllable phonotaxis in females (Huber et al. 1990). intervals are less critical parameters. Females respond to In addition to frogs, crickets and cicadas, many spe- models which contain more than 3 A-syllables with high cies of grasshoppers have evolved complex acoustic com- probability.
    [Show full text]
  • The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers
    The Transcriptomic and Genomic Architecture of Acrididae Grasshoppers Dissertation To Fulfil the Requirements for the Degree of “Doctor of Philosophy” (PhD) Submitted to the Council of the Faculty of Biological Sciences of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena by Bachelor of Science, Master of Science, Abhijeet Shah born on 7th November 1984, Hyderabad, India 1 Academic reviewers: 1. Prof. Holger Schielzeth, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 2. Prof. Manja Marz, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 3. Prof. Rolf Beutel, Friedrich Schiller University Jena 4. Prof. Frieder Mayer, Museum für Naturkunde Leibniz-Institut für Evolutions- und Biodiversitätsforschung, Berlin 5. Prof. Steve Hoffmann, Leibniz Institute on Aging – Fritz Lipmann Institute, Jena 6. Prof. Aletta Bonn, Friedrich Schiller University Jena Date of oral defense: 24.02.2020 2 Table of Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................... 5 Zusammenfassung............................................................................................................ 7 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 9 Genetic polymorphism ............................................................................................................. 9 Lewontin’s paradox ....................................................................................................................................... 9 The evolution
    [Show full text]
  • In Field Margins? a Case Study Combining Laboratory Acute Toxicity Testing with Field Monitoring Data
    Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 1874–1879, 2012 # 2012 SETAC Printed in the USA DOI: 10.1002/etc.1895 DOES INSECTICIDE DRIFT ADVERSELY AFFECT GRASSHOPPERS (ORTHOPTERA: SALTATORIA) IN FIELD MARGINS? A CASE STUDY COMBINING LABORATORY ACUTE TOXICITY TESTING WITH FIELD MONITORING DATA REBECCA BUNDSCHUH,* JULIANE SCHMITZ,MIRCO BUNDSCHUH, and CARSTEN ALBRECHT BRU¨ HL Institute for Environmental Sciences, University of Koblenz-Landau, Koblenz-Landau, Germany (Submitted 7 December 2011; Returned for Revision 11 January 2012; Accepted 17 April 2012) Abstract—The current terrestrial risk assessment of insecticides regarding nontarget arthropods considers exclusively beneficial organisms, whereas herbivorous insects, such as grasshoppers, are ignored. However, grasshoppers living in field margins or meadows adjacent to crops may potentially be exposed to insecticides due to contact with or ingestion of contaminated food. Therefore, the present study assessed effects of five active ingredients of insecticides (dimethoate, pirimicarb, imidacloprid, lambda-cyhalothrin, and deltamethrin) on the survival of Chorthippus sp. grasshopper nymphs by considering two routes of exposure (contact and oral). The experiments were accompanied by monitoring field margins that neighbored cereals, vineyards, and orchards. Grasslands were used as reference sites. The laboratory toxicity tests revealed a sensitivity of grasshoppers with regard to the insecticides tested in the present study similar to that of the standard test species used in arthropod risk assessments. In the field monitoring program, increasing grasshopper densities were detected with increasing field margin width next to cereals and vineyards, but densities remained low over the whole range of field margins from 0.5 to 20 m next to orchards. Grasshopper densities equivalent to those of grassland sites were only observed in field margins exceeding 9 m in width, except for field margins next to orchards.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Orthoptera Assemblages to Management of Montane Grasslands in the Western Carpathians
    Biologia 66/6: 1127—1133, 2011 Section Zoology DOI: 10.2478/s11756-011-0115-1 Response of Orthoptera assemblages to management of montane grasslands in the Western Carpathians Vladimíra Fabriciusová, Peter Kaňuch &AntonKrištín* Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Ľ. Štúra 2,SK-96053 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Montane grassy habitats in the Western Carpathians are relatively well preserved, maintain high species richness and are often important in accordance to the nature conservation policy in Europe. However, knowledge about the impact of farming on the habitat quality there is rather poor. The influence of various management types (permanent sheep pen, irregular grazing, mowing) on Orthoptera diversity and species determining assemblages of these habitats were analysed on 72 plots in Poľana Mts Biosphere Reserve. Altogether, 36 Orthoptera species (15 Ensifera, 21 Caelifera) were found, whereas the highest number of species was found on plots with irregular grazing (28 species), followed by plots with mown grass (17) and permanent sheep pens (14). All four measures of the assemblages’ diversity confirmed significant differences. Using Discriminant Function Analysis, correct classification rate of Orthoptera assemblages was unambiguous according to the type of management. Each form of the management harboured several characteristic species. Thus implications regarding the biodiversity conservation and grassland management were given. Key words: bush-crickets; grasshoppers; pasture; ecology; nature conservation Introduction or the influence of plant succession in meadows without any management (Marini et al. 2009). Higher species Various systems used to manage grasslands have a diversity was found in grazed compared to mowed significant influence on plant and animal communi- meadows in alpine habitats (Wettstein & Schmid 1999; ties, their species richness and abundance (Kampmann Kampmann et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Acoustic Profiling of the Landscape
    Acoustic profiling of the landscape by Paul Brian Charles Grant Dissertation presented for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of Stellenbosch Supervisor: Professor M.J. Samways Faculty of AgriSciences Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology April 2014 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Declaration By submitting this dissertation electronically, I declare that the entirety of the work contained therein is my own, original work, that I am the sole author thereof (save to the extent explicitly otherwise stated), that reproduction and publication thereof by Stellenbosch University will not infringe any third party rights and that I have not previously in its entirety or in part submitted it for obtaining any qualification. Paul B.C. Grant Date: November 2013 Copyright © 2014 Stellenbosch University All rights reserved 1 Stellenbosch University http://scholar.sun.ac.za Abstract Soft, serene insect songs add an intrinsic aesthetic value to the landscape. Yet these songs also have an important biological relevance. Acoustic signals across the landscape carry a multitude of localized information allowing organisms to communicate invisibly within their environment. Ensifera are cryptic participants of nocturnal soundscapes, contributing to ambient acoustics through their diverse range of proclamation songs. Although not without inherent risks and constraints, the single most important function of signalling is sexual advertising and pair formation. In order for acoustic communication to be effective, signals must maintain their encoded information so as to lead to positive phonotaxis in the receiver towards the emitter. In any given environment, communication is constrained by various local abiotic and biotic factors, resulting in Ensifera utilizing acoustic niches, shifting species songs spectrally, spatially and temporally for their optimal propagation in the environment.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Distribution of Orthoptera Communities of Two Adjacent Mountains in Northern Part of the Carpathians
    Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62 (2): 191–211 (2019) doi: 10.3897/travaux.62.e48604 RESEARCH ARTICLE Diversity and distribution of Orthoptera communities of two adjacent mountains in northern part of the Carpathians Anton Krištín1, Benjamín Jarčuška1, Peter Kaňuch1 1 Institute of Forest Ecology SAS, Ľ. Štúra 2, Zvolen, SK-96053, Slovakia Corresponding author: Anton Krištín ([email protected]) Received 19 November 2019 | Accepted 24 December 2019 | Published 31 December 2019 Citation: Krištín A, Jarčuška B, Kaňuch P (2019) Diversity and distribution of Orthoptera communities of two adjacent mountains in northern part of the Carpathians. Travaux du Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle “Grigore Antipa” 62(2): 191–211. https://doi.org/10.3897/travaux.62.e48604 Abstract During 2013–2017, assemblages of bush-crickets and grasshoppers were surveyed in two neighbour- ing flysch mountains – Čergov Mts (48 sites) and Levočské vrchy Mts (62 sites) – in northern part of Western Carpathians. Species were sampled mostly at grasslands and forest edges along elevational gradient between 370 and 1220 m a.s.l. Within the entire area (ca 930 km2) we documented 54 species, representing 38% of Carpathian Orthoptera species richness. We found the same species number (45) in both mountain ranges with nine unique species in each of them. No difference in mean species rich- ness per site was found between the mountain ranges (mean ± SD = 12.5 ± 3.9). Elevation explained 2.9% of variation in site species richness. Elevation and mountain range identity explained 7.3% of assemblages composition. We found new latitudinal as well as longitudinal limits in the distribu- tion for several species.
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Ecology and Morphology of Saga Pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the Northern Limit of Its Distribution
    Eur. J. Entomol. 104: 73–79, 2007 http://www.eje.cz/scripts/viewabstract.php?abstract=1200 ISSN 1210-5759 Population, ecology and morphology of Saga pedo (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae) at the northern limit of its distribution ANTON KRIŠTÍN and PETER KAĕUCH Institute of Forest Ecology, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Štúrova 2, 960 53 Zvolen, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] Key words. Tettigoniidae, survival strategies, endangered species, large insect predators, ecological limits Abstract. The bush-cricket Saga pedo, one of the largest predatory insects, has a scattered distribution across 20 countries in Europe. At the northern boundary of its distribution, this species is most commonly found in Slovakia and Hungary. In Slovakia in 2003–2006, 36 known and potentially favourable localities were visited and at seven this species was recorded for the first time. This species has been found in Slovakia in xerothermic forest steppes and limestone grikes (98% of localities) and on slopes (10–45°) with south-westerly or westerly aspects (90%) at altitudes of 220–585 m a.s.l. (mean 433 m, n = 20 localities). Most individuals (66%) were found in grass-herb layers 10–30 cm high and almost 87% within 10 m of a forest edge (oak, beech and hornbeam being prevalent). The maximum density was 12 nymphs (3rd–5th instar) / 1000 m2 (July 4, 510 m a.s.l.). In a comparison of five present and previous S. pedo localities, 43 species of Orthoptera were found in the present and 37 in previous localities. The mean numbers and relative abundance of species in present S.
    [Show full text]
  • Endemism in Italian Orthoptera
    Biodiversity Journal, 2020, 11 (2): 405–434 https://doi.org/10.31396/Biodiv.Jour.2020.11.2.401.434 Endemism in Italian Orthoptera Bruno Massa1 & Paolo Fontana2* 1Department Agriculture, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo, Italy (retired); email: [email protected] 2Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all’Adige, Italy *Corresponding author, email: [email protected] ABSTRACT The present paper discusses about the distribution of orthopterans endemic to Italy. This coun- try is located in the centre of the Mediterranean Basin and its palaeo-geographical origins are owed to complex natural phenomena, as well as to a multitude of centres-of-origin, where colonization of fauna and flora concerned. Out of 382 Orthoptera taxa (i.e., species and sub- species) known to occur in Italy, 160 (41.9%) are endemic. Most of them are restricted to the Alps, the Apennines or the two principal islands of Italy (i.e., Sardinia and Sicily). In addition, lowland areas in central-southern Italy host many endemic taxa, which probably originate from the Balkan Peninsula. In Italy, the following 8 genera are considered endemic: Sardoplatycleis, Acroneuroptila, Italopodisma, Epipodisma, Nadigella, Pseudoprumna, Chorthopodisma and Italohippus. Moreover, the subgenus Italoptila is endemic to Italy. For research regarding endemism, Orthoptera are particularly interesting because this order com- prises species characterized by different ecological traits; e.g., different dispersal abilities, contrasting thermal requirements or specific demands on their habitats. The highest percentage of apterous or micropterous (35.3%) and brachypterous (16.2%) endemic taxa live in the Apennines, which are among the most isolated mountains of the Italian Peninsula.
    [Show full text]
  • Variation, Plasticity and Possible Epigenetic Influences in Species Belonging to the Tribe Gomphocerini (Orthoptera; Gomphocerinae): a Review
    J. Crop Prot. 2021, 10 (1): 1-18________________________________________________________ Review Article Variation, plasticity and possible epigenetic influences in species belonging to the tribe Gomphocerini (Orthoptera; Gomphocerinae): A review Seyed Hossein Hodjat and Alireza Saboori* Jalal Afshar Zoological Museum, Department of Plant Protection, College of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran. Abstract: Environmental conditions can cause variation in morphology, behavior, and possibly epigenetic in the numerous species of the Gomphocerinae, especially in mountain habitats. Plasticity and changes in morphology in many of the species in this subfamily is caused by character segregation through the female choice of copulation that has produced various clines, sub-species or species groups. The variation and plasticity, as a result of environmental stress, besides morphology, affect physiology and epigenetics of many insect species. Environmental stress and female assortative mating might be accompanied by hybridization in populations, resulting in character divergence and speciation after a long period of time. Contemporary evolution and/or epigenetic inheritance may be a reason for their variation in acoustic and morphology of Gomphocerinae and the main factor in the present situation of difficulty in their classification. We review possible effects of environmental stress on plasticity, hybridization, and speciation by the appearance of endemic species. About half of the insect pest species have reduced their impacts as pests under global warming. The present insect pest situation in Iran is discussed. Keywords: Classification, Hybridization, Groups, Gomphocerini, Phenotype, Downloaded from jcp.modares.ac.ir at 8:44 IRST on Saturday September 25th 2021 Song 1. Introduction12 2002; Mol et al., 2003; Tishechkin and Bukhvalova, 2009; Vedenina and Helversen, Geographical distribution of Gomphocerinae 2009; Şirin et al., 2010, 2014; Stillwell et al., species is the source for variation, plasticity, 2010; Vedenina and Mugue, 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • Fauna Europaea - Orthopteroid Orders
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Fauna Europaea - Orthopteroid orders Heller, K.-G.; Bohn, H.; Haas, F.; Willemse, F.; de Jong, Y. DOI 10.3897/BDJ.4.e8905 Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Published in Biodiversity Data Journal License CC BY Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Heller, K-G., Bohn, H., Haas, F., Willemse, F., & de Jong, Y. (2016). Fauna Europaea - Orthopteroid orders. Biodiversity Data Journal, 4, [e8905]. https://doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.4.e8905 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:03 Oct 2021 Biodiversity Data Journal 4: e8905 doi: 10.3897/BDJ.4.e8905 Data Paper Fauna Europaea – Orthopteroid orders
    [Show full text]
  • The Chorthippus Albomarginatus-Group (Orthoptera: Acrididae: Gomphocerinae) in the Carpathian Basin: Traces of Hybridization Between C
    Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 55 (3), pp. 283–291, 2009 THE CHORTHIPPUS ALBOMARGINATUS-GROUP (ORTHOPTERA: ACRIDIDAE: GOMPHOCERINAE) IN THE CARPATHIAN BASIN: TRACES OF HYBRIDIZATION BETWEEN C. ALBOMARGINATUS AND C. OSCHEI IN SOUTHERN SLOVAKIA VEDENINA, V.1, HOLUŠA, J.2 and KOČÁREK, P.3 1Institute for Information Transmission Problems, Russian Academy of Sciences Bolshoi Karetnyi per. 19, Moscow 127994, Russia, E-mail: [email protected] 2Department of Forest Protection and Game Management Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Kamýcká 1176, CZ-16521 Praha 6-Suchdol, Czech Republic, E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Ostrava, Chittussiho 10, CZ-710 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic, E-mail: [email protected] Specimens of the Chorthippus albomarginatus-group were studied from two localities near Ardovo in southern Slovakia. We analyzed the male courtship songs and the stridulatory peg number on the inner side of the hind femora. During recording of courtship songs, the stridu- latory movements of the hind legs were also recorded. On the basis of the courtship song anal- ysis and the measurements of the peg number, the specimens from both populations are re- garded as C. oschei pusztaensis. However, deviations in song and leg movements for some specimens are consistent with hybridization between C. albomarginatus and C. oschei. Our study provides evidence that C. albomarginatus and C. oschei hybridize in Slovakia. Key words: Chorthippus oschei, courtship song, hybrid zone INTRODUCTION Grasshopper species of the Chorthippus albomarginatus-group represent an interesting species complex with quite similar morphology and similar and simple calling songs, but extremely different and complex courtship songs (HELVERSEN 1986, VEDENINA &HELVERSEN 2003, 2009).
    [Show full text]