DOCSLIB.ORG

French Revolution by the History Channel Continued

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
French Revolution by the History Channel Continued French Revolution Name: ______________________________ Period: _______ By The History Channel Pre Movie Work: Three Estates of France: First = Clergy: 130,000 (1%) Second = Nobility: 280,000 (2%) Third = Everyone Else: 27.4m (97%) The Assembly of the Estates: Clergy Votes: 33.3% Nobility Votes:33.3% Everyone Else Votes: 33.3% The Elements of the French Revolution: Weak Leadership: Louis XVI was a weak State of the state: France was in weak- Crisis: Louis dabbles in the markets and the monarch that bankrupted the country by aiding ened position economically, bad harvests, price of flour sky-rockets which makes the price America and leaving his state in a weak position. of bread double. People begin to starve... weak leadership. The Enlightenment: This period is marked by an intense movement to learn and discuss ideas including politics, religion, the state, the state of the state, should the state change its methods, its leaders, its policies, and how should that change come? Slowly, quickly, peacefully, or violently? This was the “climate” which nurtured the sentiment that would surface after the crisis. The French Revolution is famous because: For the first time in Europe a people rose up against feudal aristocratic rule and dis- mantled the structure of power including aristocracy (equality for all) the Church (powerful church figures, wealth, & property), people began to believe they could recreate almost everything in a society including, politics, institutions, human nature itself through political and violent action. Democracy?: Look at the manner in which the Assembly of States was structured. The Clergy and Nobility could easily defeat the Third Estate democratically by voting as a block. The ruling class would then say “We voted, you lost democratically, get over it”. The question is then asked “Is the democracy just”? Because it is “law”, because it is written or decided by judges “Is it just”? Is humankind’s liberty enhanced or denied? If it is not just, what actions should a society take? Vote, violence, organize rebellion? The Movie: The seat of the French Empire was in what city? Versailles which was 11 miles south of Paris the capitol of France. The royal wedding was between what two families? French House of Bourbon and Austrian House of Hapsburg. Long time adver- saries would securing their power with a political marriage. How old were Louis Capias the Marie Antoinette when married? Louis XVI was 15, Marie Antoinette was 14. What was the population growth of France in the 18th century? 20 million to 26 million in 100 years (27%) due to no plague, no other constraint on population growth. Only up from 19 to 20 million during the 1500s and 1600s (5% in two hundred years). What is Louis the XVI’s prayer as he takes the throne? Bless us, we reign too young. Louis was 20 years old. The enlightenment would over-throw the ideas if monarchy, aristocracy, and hierarchy as what? Natural birth rights of the aristocratic. Because they are born into, they are better, they are entitled to power. The French committed a great deal of money to the American revolution in order to oppose their nemesis England. What did this do to the French Empire? 2,000,000,000 livres to help America throw out England as the colonial rulers of North America. It bankrupted the French Empire and set them up for financial ruin. What was Marie Antoinette known as because of her lavish spending? Madam Deficit The Estates General was divided into three groups each with a third of the vote, what were these groups? How would it been seen as unfair? The 1st and 2nd Estates controlled 66% of the vote while the 3rd Estate, 97% of the population of France, controlled 33%. Ergo, the 1st and 2nd estates through an unjust democracy would always win a vote. What “estate” did Robespierre represent? 3rd Estate. (Everyone else, 97%) Where did the national assembly vote seize power from the King of France? Tennis/Hand Ball court. There were two main political factions during the French Revolution. Who were they and what were their main ideals? Jacobins, named after the monastery they met in as a club, this was the radical revolutionary group lead by Robespierre which would engulf France into a bloody revolution. The Girondins were named after a region in France when a particularly brilliant group of people had come from. They supported a Rome like republican form, not fully democratic and they fully opposed the monarchy. The Cordeliers were a group that were radical revolu- tionaries that opposed the monarchy and wanted to keep and eye on the new government. Danton was a member of this group early on. There were other smaller groups such as The Society of Revolutionary Women, Fraternal Society of One and the Other Sex (feminist group), Club des Impartiaux was the first royalist group, they didn’t last very long. What was the Bastille a symbol of? Aristocratic/Feudal rule, horror, torture, tyranny, injustice. What did the flag colors represent? Red and Blue for Paris, white for the House of Bourbon. French Revolution by The History Channel Continued... What angered the common people to the point that they assaulted and sacked the Bastille? Jacques Necker fired as minister. He was a voice of the people. What did the mob do to the commander of the Bastille? Paraded him through town, beat, kicked, and stabbed him. Eventually he was shot and stabbed to death. His head was put atop a pike, a symbol of the revolution. What did the “Declaration of the Rights of Man” affirm? Equality, Estates no longer recognized, established the National Assembly. The Estates General is no longer. Robespierre called for freedom of the what? Press. He wanted a press unimpeded by aristocracy or government. It eventually turned out for the worse as Jean-Paul Marat called for summary execution of people named as traitors to revolution. No trials were conduct- ed, no right of man conferred, just the execution of accused persons of the state. Who were the “Fish Ladies”? Burley working-poor women that could no longer afford food. They were armed with long knives which were used to open shellfish, remove scales, and gutting fish. They were poor people acting against their aristocratic leadership. What did the mob want to do to the queen? They wanted her dead. Her head, her limbs, her guts... What did the mob steal from the Royal Estate at Versailles? Baking flour. Where were the King and Queen forced to move and what did this effectively make them? To Paris, prisoners of the rebellion. What form of monarchy did the early revolution establish? Constitutional monarchy. Louis and Marie attempt to escape to Austria, after they were captured what did this make the King and Queen in the eyes of the peo- ple? For attempting to flee to Aristocratic Austria and away from his people and problems, Louis becomes a traitor to the rebellion and France. Why are the Kings of Austria, Prussia, and The Holy Roman Empire worried about the rebellion in France? Because it could lead to rebellions against aristocracy in their states. The ruling class feared a popular uprising. Mercenary armies were important as they have been throughout history because in this case they would kill the native population without a second thought. People identified themselves politically with what? Their pant length. Short knee pants were aristocratic while longer pants were for the working man, aka everyone else, the 97%. Who called for more boldness against the invaders and called for storming the prisons killing enemies of the state? Danton. J.P. Marat wrote the daily paper called the “Friend of the People” and he called for people storm the prisons and kill the inmates there. Why did the King have to die? He was born to be king, therefore, he must die as he is the king and a republic can have no king. What happens to people who were plotting against the revolution according Marat? He prints a list in his paper. The list contains names of people that should be detained and put to the national razor. Those who are worried about the revolution send Charlotte Cordais to do what to Marat? She was tired of the bloodshed and fear gripping her country. She was sent to and successfully killed Jean Paul Marot to stop him from calling for the execution of Frenchmen in his paper. What is the fate of Marie Antoinette? She was to be taken to the national razor. What happens to her son? After years of neglect, the boy dies a miserable death as the heir to the throne of France. What was the “Terror”? All rights of the people were suspended, state police spies were everywhere, those suspected of working against the new government was reason enough to be beheaded. What was the “Committee of Public Safety”? 12 man council to make decisions. It reduced the number of people that would decent in government and formed a vicious oligarchy that revoked and terrorized the people. (Oligarchy) What was de-Christianization? The revolution then turns it eyes to the Catholic Church as a symbol of and progenitor of radical indoc- trinating thought. The most obvious is the new “Revolutionary Calendar” that replace all aspects of date tracking. Sunday was gone and the Revolutionary Government hoped it would be forgotten. What does the French Revolutionary government do to rebel insurrections in France? They engage them in warfare, they are arrest- ed, and summarily executed. Why was Danton and his follower executed? Robespierre sees this as an act of treason against himself and revolutionary France.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The French Revolution Unfolds
    WH07_te_ch06_s02_MOD_s.fm Page 216 Monday, March 5, 2007 5:24WH07MOD_se_CH06_s02_s.fm PM Page 216 Thursday, January 25, 2007 4:17 PM Step-by-Step SECTION Instruction 2 Women march WITNESS HISTORY AUDIO to the palace. Parisian Women Storm Versailles Objectives On October 5, 1789, anger turned to action as thousands As you teach this section, keep students of women marched from Paris to Versailles. They wanted focused on the following objectives to help the king to stop ignoring their suffering. They also them answer the Section Focus Question wanted the queen. French women were particularly angry and master core content. 2 with the Austrian-born queen, Marie Antoinette. They 2 could not feed their children, yet she lived extravagantly. ■ Explain how the political crisis of 1789 The women yelled as they looked for her in the palace: led to popular revolts. Death to the Austrian! We’ll wring her neck! ■ Summarize the moderate reforms “ We’ll tear her heart out! enacted by the National Assembly in —mob of women at Versailles,” October 6, 1789 August 1789. Focus Question What political and social reforms did ■ Identify additional actions taken by the the National Assembly institute in the first stage of the National Assembly as it pressed French Revolution? onward. ■ Analyze why there was a mixed reac- tion around Europe to the events unfolding in France. The French Revolution Unfolds Objectives Excitement, wonder, and fear engulfed France as the revolution Prepare to Read • Explain how the political crisis of 1789 led to unfolded at home and spread abroad. Historians divide this revo- popular revolts.
    [Show full text]
  • Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty
    Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Author: Rebecca Clark Persistent link: http://hdl.handle.net/2345/bc-ir:103616 This work is posted on eScholarship@BC, Boston College University Libraries. Boston College Electronic Thesis or Dissertation, 2012 Copyright is held by the author, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise noted. Boston College Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Department of Political Science MONTESQUIEU ON THE HISTORY AND GEOGRAPHY OF POLITICAL LIBERTY A dissertation by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy December 2012 © Copyright by REBECCA RUDMAN CLARK 2012 Abstract Montesquieu on the History and Geography of Political Liberty Rebecca R. Clark Dissertation Advisor: Christopher Kelly Montesquieu famously presents climate and terrain as enabling servitude in hot, fertile climes and on the exposed steppes of central Asia. He also traces England’s exemplary constitution, with its balanced constitution, independent judiciary, and gentle criminal practices, to the unique conditions of early medieval northern Europe. The English “found” their government “in the forests” of Germany. There, the marginal, variegated terrain favored the dispersion of political power, and a pastoral way of life until well into the Middle Ages. In pursuing a primitive honor unrelated to political liberty as such, the barbaric Franks accidentally established the rudiments of the most “well-tempered” government. His turn to these causes accidental to human purposes in Parts 3-6 begins with his analysis of the problem of unintended consequences in the history of political reform in Parts 1-2. While the idea of balancing political powers in order to prevent any one individual or group from dominating the rest has ancient roots, he shows that it has taken many centuries to understand just what needs to be balanced, and to learn to balance against one threat without inviting another.
    [Show full text]
  • The Subversive Court of Louise Bénédicte De Bourbon, Daughter-In-Law of the Sun King (1700–1718)”
    Phi Alpha Theta Pacific Northwest Conference, 8–10 April 2021 Jordan D. Hallmark, Portland State University, graduate student, “Parody, Performance, and Conspiracy in Early Eighteenth-Century France: The Subversive Court of Louise Bénédicte de Bourbon, Daughter-in-Law of the Sun King (1700–1718)” Abstract: This paper examines how the French princess Louise Bénédicte de Bourbon, duchesse du Maine (1676–1753), the wife of Louis XIV’s illegitimate son, the duc du Maine, established an exclusive court at her château de Sceaux beginning in the year 1700 that challenged the centralized cultural system of the French monarchical state. Located twenty kilometers away from the rigid and controlling political center of Versailles, the court of the duchesse du Maine subverted social norms by inventing and performing parodies of court protocols, chivalric orders, emblems, and other forms of monarchical imagery. In a time and place where women were both legally and socially barred from holding positions of authority, the duchesse du Maine created a parallel world in which she was the sovereign, presiding over a court of important political, cultural, and intellectual figures, including the philosopher Voltaire. By considering the significance of this subversive court culture in the context of the factional divisions and dynastic crises emerging in the last years of Louis XIV’s reign, this paper will show how the seemingly frivolous aristocratic divertissements of the duchesse du Maine and her circle were informed by political, social, and dynastic ambitions that would culminate in a conspiracy to overthrow the French regent, Philippe d’Orléans, in 1718. “Parody, Performance, and Conspiracy in Early Eighteenth-Century France: The Subversive Court of Louise-Bénédicte de Bourbon, Daughter-In-Law of the Sun King (1700–1718)” by Jordan D.
    [Show full text]
  • A Senior Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego March 28, 2016 Contents
    Henry James Agee A Senior Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of Political Science at the University of California, San Diego March 28, 2016 Contents Chapter 1: Introduction.................................................................................................................1 Chapter 2: The Great Lie of the Fifth Republic.............................................................................3 Chapter 3: Literature Review / My Contribution........................................................................5 Chapter 4: A Revolution Left Unsettled, and an Identity Crisis Born.......................................23 Chapter 5: Outlining My Argument.............................................................................................27 Chapter 6: Religion and Nationalism in France Prior to 1789.................................................32 Chapter 7: The Revolution of 1789: Motivations and Outcomes.............................................41 Chapter 8: Rebellion in the Vendée - Fracture Between Republicanism and Religion..........47 Chapter 9: French Catholicism and Politics: 1801 - 1905.........................................................55 Chapter 10: The Modern National Front's Appeal to Cultural Catholicism.............................68 Chapter 11: How the National Front has Struck a Chord that Others Have Not.....................77 Chapter 12: Conclusion: Catholicism and the Destiny of France.............................................83 Acknowledgements I am extremely grateful for John
    [Show full text]
  • NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions by Ned Hémard
    NEW ORLEANS NOSTALGIA Remembering New Orleans History, Culture and Traditions By Ned Hémard A Saintly and Victorious Symbol Did you hear the story about Clovis and his wife, Clothilde? Well, it seems that Clothilde was upset that her husband was getting into fights all the time. So she prayed a long time that he would find religion. When her prayers were answered and Clovis was baptized, she suggested that he change his family crest by substituting irises for three crapauds, or toads. No, this isn’t the usual Boudreaux and Thibodeaux joke that everyone has come to love. It is merely the beginning of a long series of origin stories for the fleur-de-lis, the enduring symbol of Bourbon France, Louisiana, the City of New Orleans and its beloved “Saints” football team (to name but a few). Actually the war-like King of the Franks, Clovis (c. 466-511 A.D.), was married to the sainted Clotilda (who long prayed for his conversion). One origin tale has Clovis leading his army into battle, and (being in imminent danger of defeat) he presented himself to his Burgundian wife’s God and emerged victorious. According to Gregory of Tours, it was this victory at Tolbiac (c. 496) that led to Clovis’ baptism at Rheims by Saint Remigius, after which he had each of the three toads on his shield’s coat-of-arms replaced by the stylized lily (in French, fleur means flower and lis means lily), or iris. As a religious symbol this design has represented the Holy Trinity and also the Virgin Mary (in connection with its iconic attribute of the archangel Gabriel in the Annunciation).
    [Show full text]
  • V320141212.Pdf
    1 Institut d'Anthropologie Moléculaire, 75005 Paris France 2 Cercle d'Etudes Historiques Louis XVII, 78000 Versailles, France Abstract: We complete in the present paper our previous work (Lucotte et al. 2014, Int J Sciences, 3 (7): 28-32) on DNA marker of Karl Wilhelm Naundorff by the study of his Y-chromosome profile. For fourteen Y-STRs studied allelic values are identical to those of Hugues de Bourbon, the living 4th generation descendant of the Naundorff' elder branch. These datas establish that H. de Bourbon is patrilinealy related to K.W. Naundorff. Keywords: Y-chromosome markers; short tandem repeats (STRs); allelic values; Hugues de Bourbon; members of the Naundorff' family Introduction The king of France Louis XVI and the Queen Marie- MATERIAL AND METHODS Antoinette were beheaded in 1793, during the french Naundorff’ genomic DNA used is that which was Revolution. Their two children Marie-Thérèse extracted from his hair number 3 (Lucotte et al., Charlotte (1778-1851) and Louis-Charles (1785- 2014), that had a bulb and was covered by numerous 1795?) remained imprisoned in the Temple (in Paris) dandruff. where they survived to the death of their parents. According to the official records, Louis-Charles From this DNA, we amplified 15 Y-STRs by using (Louis XVII) died of tuberculosis in the Temple on 8 the AmpFirst Identifiler PCR amplification kit (Amp June 1795. But this version of his death has been FIRSTY filerTM, Applied Biosystems), according to repeatedly questioned; one of the most persistent the instructions given by the Company; this theories claims that it was a substitute who died on 8 amplification kit is specially adapted to the study of June.
    [Show full text]
  • The Justification of Violence Within the Principles of Maximilien
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@Providence Providence College DigitalCommons@Providence History Student Papers History Spring 2013 A Plagued Mind: The uJ stification of Violence within the Principles of Maximilien Robespierre Kevin Lynch Providence College Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_students Part of the European History Commons, and the Political History Commons Lynch, Kevin, "A Plagued Mind: The usJ tification of Violence within the Principles of Maximilien Robespierre" (2013). History Student Papers. Paper 9. http://digitalcommons.providence.edu/history_students/9 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the History at DigitalCommons@Providence. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Student Papers by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Providence. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTRODUCTION Maximilien Francois Marie Isidore de Robespierre entered the world with humble beginnings on the 6th of May, 1758. In spite of the immense sufferings he endured in his youth, Maximilien Robespierre persevered through these struggles by dedicating himself wholly to his studies. In keeping with his family tradition, Robespierre became a lawyer in his hometown of Arras, working as tirelessly as he had in his childhood. At a first glance of Robespierre’s beginning, it seemed unlikely his life would become as tumultuous as the time he lived. Better yet, it seemed closer to an outright impossibility that he would directly play a role in a revolution that fundamentally changed the society of France, and indeed Europe, forever. The lawyer from Arras rose in simultaneous speed with the French Revolution, although he never saw it completed.
    [Show full text]
  • Kings of France - Part 1
    Case study 11 11 Kings of France - Part 1 Objective. This study describes the French royal dynasty since Hughes Capet in 941. Its underlying goal is to study some properties and algo- rithms of widespread tree data structures. This first document of a series of two analyzes the dynasty of Kings of France, stores it in a database and extracts some simple information from it. The next study will be devoted to the derivation of more complex information. Keywords. genealogy, tree, cyclic data structure, interval, ordering rela- tion, temporal query, de Morgan law. 11.1 Introduction Kings and queens generally have complicated lives, full of wars, plots, crimes, betrayal, family affairs, political alliances, unhappy marriages, mistresses, lovers, bastard and hidden children. Just to begin with. The genealogy of Kings of France is one of the most turbulent, and therefore interesting lineages. Fortunately, the Salic law1, edicted by King Clovis I in the 6th century, to which the Frankish government system was submitted, introduced important constraints in the royal inheritance principles that will substantially simplify the representation of French royal lineages in a database. One of the titles 1. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salic_law 2 Case study 11 • Kings of France - Part 1 (rules) of this law, the agnatic succession, organizes the succession of monarchs. In particular, it strictly excludes women and favours father-son or brother-brother succession, whenever possible.2 This means that, during nearly a millenary, the Kings of France are organized as a simple tree, a structure particularly straightforward to translate into data structures. It is clear that, in this organization, women would have made things much more complicated.
    [Show full text]
  • D: the Bourbons Restored; Louis XVIII and the Charter; Charles X and the Revolution of 1830
    F962B2: Monarchy, Republic and Empire; France 1814-70 How successful was the Reign of Louis XVIII 1814 . Louis XVIII was old, weak and unpopular. He was an uninspiring figure to the French, who were used to Napoleonic glory. Louis had been imposed by the allies and was accordingly resented. Louis did little to inspire France with new policies. There were rumours that he would confiscate property seized from nobles during the last twenty years. The armies occupying Paris demanded that Louis XVIII implement a constitution. The Charter . The Charter of 1814 guranteed Freedom of Religion, a legislature composed of the Chamber of Deputies and the Chamber of Peers and limited press freedom,. The property would remain in the hands of their current owners. Taxation was to be voted on by the chambers. Catholicism was the official religion of France. Candidates for the Chamber of Deputies had to pay over 1,000 francs per year in tax, and be over the age of forty. The King appointed peers to the Chamber of Peers on a hereditary basis, or for life at his discretion. Deputies were to elected every five years, with one fifth of them up for election each year. There were 90,000 citizens eligible to vote. This meant that the Chamber was dominated by the aristocracy for most of the time from 1814- 30. The Settlement . Louis XVIII signed the Treaty of Paris on 30 May 1814. The treaty gave France her 1792 borders, which extended east of the Rhine. She had to pay no war indemnity, and the occupying armies of the Sixth Coalition withdrew instantly from French soil.
    [Show full text]
  • The French Revolution
    The French Revolution ‘This is more than a history of the French Revolution. It covers all Europe during the revolutionary period, though events in France naturally take first place. It is particularly good on the social and intellectual back- ground. Surprisingly enough, considering that Lefebvre was primarily an economic historian, it also breaks new ground in its account of international relations, and sets the wars of intervention in their true light. The French have a taste for what they call works of synthesis, great general summaries of received knowledge. We might call them textbooks, though of the highest level. At any rate, in its class, whether synthesis or textbook, this is one of the best ever produced.’ A. J. P. Taylor Georges Lefebvre The French Revolution From its origins to 1793 Translated by Elizabeth Moss Evanson With a foreword by Paul H. Beik London and New York La Révolution française was first published in 1930 by Presses Universitaires de France. A new, entirely rewritten, version was published in 1951. The present work is a translation of the first three parts of the revised edition of 1957. First published in the United Kingdom 1962 by Routledge and Kegan Paul First published in Routledge Classics 2001 by Routledge 11 New Fetter Lane, London EC4P 4EE Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005. “To purchase your own copy of this or any of Taylor & Francis or Routledge’s collection of thousands of eBooks please go to www.eBookstore.tandf.co.uk.” © 1962 Columbia University Press All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • French Revolution and the Trial of Marie Antoinette Background Guide Table of Contents
    French Revolution And The Trial Of Marie Antoinette Background Guide Table of Contents Letter from the Chair Letter from the Crisis Director Committee Logistics Introduction to the Committee Introduction to Topic One History of the Problem Past Actions Taken Current Events Questions to Consider Resources to Use Introduction to Topic Two History of the Problem Past Actions Taken Current Events Questions to Consider Resources to Use Bibliography Staff of the Committee Chair: Peyton Coel Vice Chair: Owen McNamara Crisis Director: Hans Walker Assistant Crisis Director: Sydney Steger Coordinating Crisis Director: Julia Mullert Under Secretary General Elena Bernstein Taylor Cowser, Secretary General Neha Iyer, Director General Letter from the Chair Hello Delegates! I am so thrilled to welcome you all to BosMUN XIX. For our returning delegates, welcome back! For our new delegates, we are so excited to have you here and hope you have an amazing time at the conference. My name is Peyton Coel and I am so honored to be serving as your Chair for this incredible French Revolution committee. I’m a freshman at Boston University double majoring in History and International Relations. I’m from the frigid Champlain Valley in Vermont, so the winters here in Boston are no trouble at all for me. When I’m not rambling on about fascinating events in history or scouring the news for important updates, you can find me playing club water polo or swimming laps in the lovely FitRec pool, exploring the streets of Boston (Copley is my favorite place to go), and painting beautiful landscapes with the help of Bob Ross.
    [Show full text]
  • Gustav III of Sweden on the Fall of the Bastille, 1789
    chap 3 17/7/03 11:10 am Page 76 Death of the Old Regime? Gustav III of Sweden on the fall of the Bastille, 1789 Letter from Gustav III to Count Stendingk, his ambassador at St Petersburg, 7 August 1789 Nothing is more terrible than the events at Paris between 12th and 15th July: the Invalides broken into; canon and armed force used against the Bastille; this fortress taken by storm; the governor, Monsieur de Launay, dragged by the mob to the Place de Grève and decapitated; his head car- ried in triumph around the town; the same treatment meted out to the chief magistrate; the formation of a civil militia of 48,000 men; the French and Swiss guards joined with the people; Monsieur de Lafayette proclaimed commander-in-chief of the Paris militia; blue and red cock- ades raised,5 the Estates declaring the King’s ministers and the civil and military authorities to be responsible to the nation; and the King, alone with the Comte de Provence and the Comte d’Artois,6 going on foot, without escort, to the Assembly, almost to apologise, and to request assistance to put down the disturbances: this is how weakness, uncer- tainty and an imprudent violence will overturn the throne of Louis XVI. I am still so disturbed by this news that I am afraid my letter shows it. Source: A. Lentin (ed.), Enlightened Absolutism (1760–1790). A Documentary Sourcebook, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, Avero Publica- tions, 1985, p. 281. 5 Blue and red were the colours of the city of Paris.
    [Show full text]