DOCSLIB.ORG

Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project Draft

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project Draft Draft Environmental Assessment Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project Jackson County, Oregon U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Department of the Interior Lead Agency Cooperating Agency Bureau of Reclamation Bureau of Land Mangament Pacific Northwest Region Medford District Office Lower Columbia Area Office Medford, Oregon Portland, Oregon November 2008 U.S. Department of the Interior The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian tribes and our commitments to island communities. Mission of the Bureau of Reclamation The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Draft Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project EA TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Location and Background ....................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose and Need.................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Authority ................................................................................................................. 3 1.4 Scoping.................................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Related Actions and Activities................................................................................ 4 Chapter 2 Alternatives ............................................................................................................ 7 2.1 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 7 2.1.1 Alternative Development ............................................................................ 7 2.2 Alternatives ............................................................................................................. 8 2.2.1 Alternative A – No Action.......................................................................... 8 2.2.2 Preferred Alternative................................................................................... 9 Chapter 3 Affected Environment and Environmental Consequences.............................. 11 3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 11 3.2 Recreation.............................................................................................................. 11 3.2.1 Affected Environment............................................................................... 11 3.2.2 Environmental Consequences................................................................... 14 3.3 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................ 15 3.3.1 Affected Environment............................................................................... 15 3.3.2 Environmental Consequences................................................................... 17 3.4 Indian Trust Assets................................................................................................ 17 3.4.1 Affected Environment............................................................................... 17 3.4.2 Environmental Consequences................................................................... 18 3.5 Socioeconomics and Environmental Justice ......................................................... 18 3.5.1 Affected Environment............................................................................... 18 3.5.2 Environmental Consequences................................................................... 20 3.6 Water Quality ........................................................................................................ 20 3.6.1 Affected Environment............................................................................... 20 3.6.2 Environmental Consequences................................................................... 20 3.7 Vegetation ............................................................................................................. 21 3.7.1 Affected Environment............................................................................... 21 November 2008 i Draft Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project EA 3.7.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................21 3.8 Wildlife ..................................................................................................................22 3.8.1 Affected Environment................................................................................22 3.8.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................22 3.9 Threatened and Endangered Species......................................................................23 3.9.1 Affected Environment................................................................................23 3.9.2 Environmental Consequences....................................................................24 3.10 Cumulative Impacts ...............................................................................................24 Chapter 4 Consultation and Coordination ..........................................................................27 4.1 Public Involvement ................................................................................................27 4.2 Agency Consultation and Coordination.................................................................27 4.2.1 Endangered Species Act ............................................................................27 4.2.2 National Historic Preservation Act............................................................27 4.3 Tribal Consultation and Coordination....................................................................28 4.3.1 Government-to-Government Consultation with Tribes.............................28 4.3.2 Indian Sacred Sites (Executive Order 13007)............................................28 4.3.3 Indian Trust Assets ....................................................................................28 4.3.4 Other Laws and Regulations......................................................................28 Chapter 5 Cited Sources ........................................................................................................29 Chapter 6 List of Preparers...................................................................................................31 LIST OF TABLES Table 1 – Features of Each Alternative.......................................................................................7 Table 2 - Ethnicity in Jackson County, Oregon in 2000...........................................................19 LIST OF TABLES Figure 1 – Location Map........................................................................................................... iii Figure 2 – Detailed Map of Location........................................................................................ iv Figure 3 – Land Ownership Boundaries .....................................................................................2 Figure 4 – New Restroom and Shower Facility at Klum Landing Campground........................5 Figure 5 –Klum Landing Campground Current Configuration ..................................................8 Figure 6 – Proposed Klum Landing Campground Configuration (Conceptual Design) ............9 Figure 7 – Native surface campsite at Klum Landing Campground. .......................................12 ii November 2008 Draft Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project EA Figure 1 – Location Map November 2008 iii Draft Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project EA Figure 2 – Detailed Map of Location iv November 2008 Draft Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project EA Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION The Bureau of Reclamation (Reclamation) is proposing to allow Jackson County Parks (JCP) to improve Klum Landing Campground at Howard Prairie Reservoir. This draft Environmental Assessment (EA) evaluates the proposed alternatives for the Klum Landing Campground Improvement Project. Reclamation administers the Howard Prairie Reservoir along with land sections of irregular length and width around it. Land ownerships vary with each section as indicated in Figure 3. Half of the campground is on Reclamation land and half is on Oregon & California Railroad (O&C) lands under management jurisdiction of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). This draft EA evaluates the actions proposed for the entire campground through a Memorandum of Understanding with BLM (Appendix A), which is a cooperating agency under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). This draft EA will be used to determine whether to issue a Finding of No Significant Impact or a Notice of Intent to prepare an Environmental Impact Statement. 1.1 Location and Background Howard Prairie Dam and Reservoir is located approximately 15 miles east of Ashland, Oregon in the Rogue River Project Talent Division in southwestern Jackson County, Oregon (see Figure 1). The reservoir is located on Beaver Creek in the Klamath River basin. Howard Prairie Dam impounds water that is released into the Howard Prairie Delivery Canal for irrigation districts in the Bear Creek Valley.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MAY I 3 1997 National Park Service
    RECEIVED 22SO NFS Form 10-900 0MB No. 1024-0018 (Rev. 10-90) United States Department of the Interior MAY I 3 1997 National Park Service NA'I lO This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form (National Register Bulletin 16A). Complete each item by marking "x" in the appropriate box or by entering the information requested. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. Place additional entries and narrative items on continuation sheets (NPS Form 10-900a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer, to complete all items. 1, Name of Property sssssSi wU JUB a — —ssssaaBssssia a sssma jaasas asasasss historic name Reginald Parsons Dead Indian Lodge other names/site number Reginald Parsons Summer Cabin? Dead Indian Tree Farm street & number 21 miles east of Ashland on Hyatt Prairie Rd at milepost 4 not for publication N/A city or town Ashland_______________________________ vicinity X state Oregon_____________ code OR county Jackson code 029 zip code 97520 3* State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1986, as amended, I hereby certify that this X nomination ___ request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60.
    [Show full text]
  • Special Session Senate
    Special Session 2008 Special Session Senate SEVENTY-FOURTH LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY – 2008 SPECIAL SESSION SS-1 OFFICERS OF THE SENATE PETER COURTNEY, President MARGARET CARTER, President Pro Tempore JUDY HALL, Secretary of the Senate SENATE CAUCUS LEADERS RICHARD DEVLIN, Majority Leader TED FERRIOLI, Republican Leader LAURIE MONNES ANDERSON, Deputy Majority Leader JACKIE WINTERS, Deputy Republican Leader ALAN BATES, Majority Whip JEFF KRUSE, Minority Whip MARK HASS, Majority Whip BRAD AVAKIAN, Assistant Majority Leader FLOYD PROZANSKI, Assistant Majority Leader SENATE DESK PERSONNEL BRITTON TAYLOR, Publications Coordinator JULIE MEDINA, Assistant Journal Editor CYNDY JOHNSTON, Calendar Composer/Journal Editor JAMES GOULDING/JIM STEMBRIDGE, Reading Clerk RYAN THORSON, Sergeant at Arms CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL We, the undersigned, having supervised the revision of the Journal and Status Report of the Senate covering the Special Session of the Seventy- fourth Legislative Assembly, hereby certify that such Journals and Status Report are correct to the best of our information and belief. PETER COURTNEY President of the Senate JUDY HALL Secretary of the Senate SS-2 SEVENTY-FOURTH LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY – 2008 SPECIAL SESSION SEVENTY–FOURTH LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY- 2008 SPECIAL SESSION SS-3 SENATORS' ADDRESSES Atkinson, Jason..............................P.O. Box 1704, Grants Pass, OR 97528................................................. Rep ............2 Avakian, Brad.................................17915 NW Lonerock Dr., Portland, OR................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Okay, So We Had a Little Fun with the Cover
    Editorial Party Favors Okay, so we had a little fun with the cover. For a few brief days in late April and early May 2002, Ron Saxton led the polls in the gubernatorial Republican primary. Under the counsel of longtime Oregon political operative Elaine Franklin, Saxton’s campaign imploded in the final days as he moved aggressively left on social issues, abortion and assisted suicide. Now, four years later, Saxton has a new face to his campaign, new political consultants…and a new political bedfellow, Lars Larson. Has he done wrong? Last month, a Sunday Oregonian editorial began the paper’s campaign for an open primary. The idea, an initiative of political outsiders Phil Keisling and Norma Paulus, is aimed at the November ballot. The Oregonian has consistently argued that partisanship is the root of all evils in Oregon politics. The newspaper made the argument that if someone as moderate and intelligent as Ron Saxton is forced to cuddle up to Lars Larson and the right wingers in order to win his party’s nomination, it proves how broken our state’s partisan political system is. Richard Nixon is the American politician credited with the adage that you run to your party’s extreme base in the primary, and then you run back hard to the middle in the general election. This was Saxton’s strategy, as he took a position on illegal immigration to the right of and in conflict with President Bush during a three-way candidate debate with Kevin Mannix and Jason Atkinson. This hot button issue happens to be the passion of conservative talk show host Lars Larson.
    [Show full text]
  • Oregonlive.Com's Printer-Friendly Page
    OregonLive.com's Printer-Friendly Page http://www.oregonlive.com/printer/printer.ssf?/base/news/11450791756... Feeling taxed? Not big business Revenue - Two decades of cuts have slashed Oregon's corporate tax burden, and households are footing the bill Sunday, April 16, 2006 BETSY HAMMOND The Oregonian When Oregonians file their state income tax returns Monday, they will be on track to pay $10.6 billion over two years -- nearly 90 percent of the tab for state government -- while corporations that do business in Oregon will pay $705 million. The disparity results from two decades of decisions by state lawmakers to recast tax policy to favor corporate interests, particularly big manufacturers and large out-of-state companies. Despite election-year rhetoric that businesses are overtaxed, no state asks businesses to pay a lighter share of its state budget than Oregon does, according to the Council on State Taxation, which represents big business. Instead, Oregon households shoulder the tax burden for schools, health care, public safety and other state services. The trend comes into stark relief this year when: A middle-income family in the Portland suburbs pays more in state taxes than they would pay in the typical Western state but gets below-average services, including bigger class sizes and less college financial aid for children. Intel -- Oregon's largest employer and a company that paid $50 million a year in Oregon corporate taxes a few years ago -- will see its 2006 tax bill fall to a fraction of that amount, potentially as low as $10. Businesses in Oregon benefit from $40 million in corporate tax breaks, more than $100 million in corporate kicker credits and the final phase-in of a $40 million tax cut from a new tax formula.
    [Show full text]
  • 5Th Environmental Film Series, Spring Semester 2020
    5th Environmental Film Series, Spring Semester 2020 Ohio State's School of Environment and Natural Resources/ Environmental Professionals Network and Sustainability Institute January 21 CBEC Room 130, 7:00 to 9:00 PM Thomas Mangelsen Live and in person, in a return visit to OSU and EPN, upon the opening of a year-long exhibition of his iconic photographs at COSI, don’t miss the opportunity to interact with this renowned photographer and passionate wildlife conservation leader. Quoting From the Steve Johnson, Chicago Tribune arts critic review of Mangelsen’s “A Life in the Wild” exhibition (coming to COSI mid-January), “For all the beauty and how-did- he-shoot-that wonder of the imagery, the exhibit throbs, too, with an environmental message: These creatures in these places are beyond special. In Mangelsen’s compositions, there is something of the sacred to the line of gray wolves walking across a Yellowstone valley landscape or the moose on a small hill, reflected, along with the great Alaska mountain Denali, in the water below. These scenes are revealed to us not so we may glimpse a passing moment, in Mangelsen’s vision, but so that we may prove ourselves worthy of seeing more like them.” Noteworthy too is Mangelsen’s support for the federal Endangered Species Act, including opposition of de-listing the grizzly bear in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem. Article Washington Post article The Gift of the Grizzly TEDx style talk in Jackson Hole in 2018 Biography Chicago Tribune exhibition review Wikipedia Jane Goodall shares Mangelsen story 60 Minutes episode script and photos with Tom Mangelsen, Anderson Cooper, and Jane Goodall Mangelsen website per 60 Minutes episode Program Welcome and introduction of Tom Mangelsen, David Hanselmann, OSU SENR Lecturer and former chief of soil and water resources at ODNR.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality of Bear Creek Basin, Jackson County, Oregon
    Water Quality of Bear Creek Basin, Jackson County, Oregon By Loren A. Wittenberg and Stuart W. McKenzie U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Open-File Report 80-158 Prepared in cooperation with the Rogue Valley Council of Governments and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality 1980 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR CECIL D. ANDRUS, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY H. William Menard, Director For additional information write to: U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY P. 0. Box 3202 Portland, Oregon 97208 Contents Page Conversion factors -------------------------------------------------------- Abstract------------------------------------------------------------------ 1 PART I - EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction-------------------------------------------------------------- 5 Identified water uses in Bear Creek basin---------------------------- 6 Water-quality standards----------------------------------------- 6 Reference levels------------------------------------------------ 9 Water-quality problems in Bear Creek basin--------------------------- 10 Irrigation-water assessment----------------------------------------------- n On-farm use---------------------------------------------------------- 11 Pastures-------------------------------------------------------- 12 Cultivated orchards --------------------------------------------- 14 Row crops------------------------------------------------------- 14 Irrigation-cana1-and-stream system------------- -------------------- 14 Talent Irrigation District--------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Statewide Trails Plan, Entitled Oregon Trails 2016: a Vision for the Future, Constitutes Oregon’S Ten-Year Plan for Recreational Trail Management
    Oregon Trails 2016: Oregon Trails 2016: A Vision for the Future A Vision for the Future Download the report online at: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Oregon Parks and Recreation Department 725 Summer Street NE, Suite C Salem, OR 97301-1271 503-986-0980 For the hearing impaired: 1-800-735-2900 This publication is available in alternative formats upon request. Printed on recycled paper. February, 2016 2016-2025 2016-2025 Oregon Statewide Recreation Trails Plan Oregon Parks and Recreation Department Forward A MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR, OREGON PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT I am pleased to present of trail users and non-motor- Oregon Trails 2016: A Vision ized boaters resulting in feed- For The Future. This plan is back and opinions from 7,450 the product of more than two randomly selected residents. years of consultation and col- Trails plan workshops were laboration of recreational trail held in 14 locations across providers, interest groups and the state, allowing additional citizens across the state. It is public input on trails issues the state’s “official plan for rec- and funding need. We would reational trail management” to thank all citizens who took for the next 10 years, serving time to participate in the sur- as a statewide and regional information and planning veys and public workshops. tool to assist Oregon recreation providers (local, state, The plan has identified three top management issues federal, and private) in providing trail opportunities for each trail category type in the state. For OHV and and promoting access to Oregon’s trails and waterways. snowmobile trails, closure of trails and unimproved It also identifies how the state’s limited resources will backcountry roads on federal lands came to the fore- be allocated for motorized, non-motorized, and water front as top challenges.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Guide to Ashland and the Greater Rogue Valley
    Birding Guide to Ashland and the Greater Rogue Valley Birdwatching is one of the fastest growing outdoor recreational activities in the nation. For Welcome to … visitors to Ashland, birdwatching offers a nice complement to the cultural tourism that attracts The Klamath-Siskiyou Bioregion 250,000 visitors annually. This Birding Guide to Ashland and the Greater Rogue Valley was created to help visitors and residents get outdoors and enjoy the natural splendor of the region and its birds. To plan your visit to Ashland and the surrounding countryside, go online to the Ashland Chamber’s Visitor and Convention Bureau website for information (www.AshlandChamber.com) on food, lodging, and entertainment. Using this Guide This guide showcases 32 birding locations Western Tanager; Photo © Jim Livaudais throughout Ashland and the Rogue Valley, covering a variety of habitats and birdlife. Each Located in southern Oregon and northern site description includes a brief characterization California, the Klamath-Siskiyou Bioregion is of the habitat plus mention of species of note. defined by the convergence of the Cascade Mountains from the north, the Sierra Nevadas While locations can be birded individually, we from the south, the Coast Range, and the east- provide six birding routes with directions from west running Klamath and Siskiyou Mountains. one location to This region includes the Umpqua, Rogue, and the next. Routes Klamath River watersheds. Due to its complex are designed as geology and climate, the Bioregion is among the full or half-day most biologically diverse in the world! birding trips. To easily find The Bioregion contains a wide variety of habitat locations, we types, which in turn support a plethora of species, recommend that including endemic plants and animals that are you use a found nowhere else in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riley Reporttm
    THE RILEY REPORTTM Oregon Voter Poll Analysis & Cross Tabulations November 14, 2005 www.rileyresearch.com 9900 S.W. Wilshire, Suite 250, Portland, OR 97225 phone [503] 222-4179 fax [503] 222-4313 INTRODUCTION & METHODOLOGY Riley Research Associates surveyed Oregon voters regarding their opinions on a variety of current subjects. The scientific telephone poll was conducted among 476 registered voters throughout the state. In this recent voter survey, participants needed to have voted in at least one of the past two (primary and general) elections. A sample of 476 provides accuracy to within +/-4.49 percent at a 95 percent level of confidence. Fielding took place between October 18th and 25th 2005. A slightly high proportion of women participated, resulting in the decision to weight the sample, to achieve a 53/47 split of women to men as reflective of the voter list. Results may slightly under-represent younger and cell phone-only households, who remain somewhat elusive in traditional phone surveys. SUMMARY OF FINDINGS Oregon’s 2006 Race for Governor – Primary Choices Democrats In our last poll (August 2005), incumbent Governor Ted Kulongoski had a decisive edge, well ahead of other Democrat challengers. However, while a large proportion of Democrats is undecided (36 percent), the possible entry of former governor John Kitzhaber has radically changed the Democrats’ primary election landscape: • Kitzhaber (29 percent) and Kulongoski (27 percent) are statistically tied • No one else cracks double-digits • Kitzhaber does especially well among
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 Biennial Report to the Legislature
    OREGON GLOBAL WARMING COMMISSION Report to the Legislature January 2009 D. A. Black OREGON GLOBAL WARMING COMMISSION Chair Angus Duncan President, Bonneville Environmental Foundation Vice-Chairs Jim Rue Businessman Dr. Mark Abbott Dean/Professor, College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University Commission Members Bishop David Brauer-Rieke Oregon Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America Matt Donegan Co-founder and Co-president, Forest Capital Partners Andrea Durbin Executive Director, Oregon Environmental Council Jill Eiland Oregon Corporate Affairs Manager, Intel Corporation Peggy Fowler CEO and President, Portland General Electric Russ Hoeflich Vice President and Oregon Director, The Nature Conservancy Gregg Kantor President and Chief Operating Officer, Northwest Natural Gas Eric Lemelson Owner and Manager, Lemelson Vineyards Bill Wyatt Executive Director, Port of Portland Ex Officio Members Bill Bradbury Secretary of State Dr. Mel Kohn Acting Director and State Health Officer, Department of Human Services, Public Health Division Michael Grainey Director, Oregon Department of Energy Matt Garrett Director, Oregon Department of Transportation Dick Pedersen Director, Oregon Department of Environmental Quality Katy Coba Director, Oregon Department of Agriculture Phil Ward Director, Oregon Department of Water Resources Marvin Brown Oregon State Forester Lee Beyer Chair, Oregon Public Utility Commission Rep. Ben Cannon Representative, Oregon State Legislature Rep. Scott Bruun Representative, Oregon State Legislature
    [Show full text]
  • Rogue River Basin Project
    Rogue River Basin Project Toni Rae Linenberger Bureau of Reclamation 1999 Table of Contents The Rogue River Basin Project ...................................................2 Project Location.........................................................2 Historic Setting .........................................................3 Prehistoric Setting .................................................3 Historic Setting ...................................................5 Project Authorization....................................................12 Construction History ....................................................14 Post-Construction History................................................20 Settlement of the Project .................................................23 Uses of Project Water ...................................................23 Conclusion............................................................25 About the Author .............................................................25 Bibliography ................................................................26 Archival Collections ....................................................26 Government Documents .................................................26 Books ................................................................26 Index ......................................................................27 1 The Rogue River Basin Project The primary purpose of Reclamation projects has always been irrigation and settlement of the arid American West. Oftentimes, however, these projects
    [Show full text]
  • Aquatic Plant Surveys in the Bureau of Land Management, Medford District, 2010-2011
    Portland State University PDXScholar Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations Center for Lakes and Reservoirs 12-2011 Aquatic Plant Surveys in the Bureau of Land Management, Medford District, 2010-2011 Mark D. Sytsma Portland State University, [email protected] Rich Miller Portland State University, [email protected] Vanessa Morgan Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub Part of the Environmental Monitoring Commons, Fresh Water Studies Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Citation Details Sytsma, Mark D.; Miller, Rich; and Morgan, Vanessa, "Aquatic Plant Surveys in the Bureau of Land Management, Medford District, 2010-2011" (2011). Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations. 47. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/centerforlakes_pub/47 This Report is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Publications and Presentations by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. AQUATIC PLANT SURVEYS IN THE BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, MEDFORD DISTRICT, 2010-2011 Report Prepared for the Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Mark Sytsma, Rich Miller, and Vanessa Morgan Center for Lakes and Reservoirs Portland State University December, 2011 Nymphoides peltata in the Little Squaw Lake, Jackson County, Oregon. DRAFT Aquatic
    [Show full text]