Les Henry Associates Limited January 2021 Leshenry@Btinternet

GOSLING STREET LIMITED

PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

69A ALBERT ROAD, BROMLEY, KENT.

TRANSPORT STATEMENT

Les Henry associates Limited January 2021 [email protected] Tel: 020 8858 9869 Mobile: 0775 246 2202 Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Contents

Page

1. Introduction 3

2. Site, Highway and Transport Characteristics 4

3. The Proposals 5

4. Planning Policy 6

5. On street car Parking Stress 20

6. Road Safety Audit 21

7. Highways Implications 22

8. Refuse and Recycling Management 25

9. Fire Safety and Emergency Access 26

10. Conclusions 28

Appendix A Site Photographs 29

Appendix B PTAL Calculation 34

Appendix C Overnight Car Parking Surveys 37

Appendix D Road Safety Audit & Designer’s Response 57

Appendix E TRICS Data 77

Appendix F Vehicle Tracking Analyses 100

Appendix G 2011 Census Data 113

Appendix H Refuse and Recycling Information 122

Les Henry Associates Limited 2 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

1.0 Introduction

1.1 Les Henry Associates Limited have been instructed by Gosling Street Limited to produce this Transport Statement in support of the proposed residential development at 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ.

1.2 My name is Leslie James Henry. I am an Incorporated Engineer, a Fellow of the Institute of Highway Engineers and a Member of the Chartered Institution of Highways and Transportation.

1.3 I have been involved in highway and traffic engineering issues for over 35 years in connection with new development and road safety schemes within both the private and public sector.

1.4 This Transport Statement considers the Highways and Transport implications for the proposed development and is presented in the following sections: -

a. Section 2 describes the existing transport local conditions, including accessibility by non-car modes; b. Section 3 describes the proposals; proposed development; c. Section 4 reviews relevant national, regional, and local transport policy and considers whether the proposals are acceptable considering the adopted standards; d. Section 5 provides details of overnight car parking surveys; e. Section 6 provides details of a Road Safety Audit undertaken in respect of the proposed site access arrangements; f. Section 7 compares the likely traffic generated by the existing and proposed uses on the site, analyses the vehicle collision record for the roads surrounding the proposal site and describes the potential transport impact of the proposed development; g. Section 8 summarises the findings of the Transport Statement and draws its conclusions accordingly.

Les Henry Associates Limited 3 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

2.0 Site, Highway and Transport Characteristics

2.1 The proposal site lies to the rear of the houses on the northern side of Albert Road with an existing vehicular and pedestrian access located approximately 50m southwest of the junction with Salisbury Road.

2.2 The Planning Authority and Highway Authority is London Borough of Bromley.

Figure 1: Site Location Plan

2.3 Figure 1 above shows the site’s location in terms of the wider highway network.

2.4 The site has a PTAL of 2 (Poor) with 6 bus routes within the specified walking distances for PTAL calculation.

2.5 Bus routes 358, 61, 261, 320, 336 and 208 are all reasonably accessible and provide links to Orpington, Crystal Palace, Chislehurst, Lewisham, Farnborough, Biggin Hill and Catford.

2.6 Bickley railway station lies approximately 1.5km away to the northeast and Bromley South railway station lies approximately 2.2km to the northwest.

2.7 The surrounding highway network has good quality footways, carriageways, and street lighting.

2.8 Vehicular access to the site is via an alleyway between Nos 67 and 69 Albert Road, which was previously approximately 3m wide but has been widened following the inclusion of the strip of land on the western side.

2.9 The site was formerly used as a depot for an electrical contractor and comprises buildings in various states of repair spread over the site comprising just over 1,000m².

Les Henry Associates Limited 4 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

3.0 The Proposals

3.1 The proposals are for the redevelopment of the site to provide 6 x 3- bedroom houses each with an off-street car parking space. Three of the car parking spaces would be provided “on-plot” for the houses to the northeast of the development and 3 spaces would be provided in a communal area between the proposed two short terraces of 3 houses.

3.2 All of the proposed car parking spaces would have an electric vehicle charging point.

3.3 The access to the site would be approximately 3.95m wide between Nos 67 and 69 Albert Road and whilst not being wide enough to allow two cars to pass, would provide a safe access shared by pedestrians and expected slow-moving vehicles.

3.4 The proposals include the provision of 2 bicycle parking spaces for each dwelling in accordance with London Plan standards provided in a communal area in front of the proposed houses.

3.5 Refuse and recycling storage would be provided in front of the proposed houses on the southern side of the access adjacent to the proposed cycle parking.

3.6 It is understood that residential properties in the locality are provided with wheeled bins for refuse and recycling purposes. It is anticipated that these would be moved to a suitable collection point within 20m of the highway collection point at collection times.

Figure 2: Proposed Site Layout Plan

Les Henry Associates Limited 5 January 2021 Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

4.0 Planning Policy

National Policy

4.1 A revised National Planning Policy Framework was published by Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government in July 2018 and replaces the earlier document published in March 2012.

4.2 The NPPF presumes in favour of sustainable development and is a material consideration in planning decisions. Core land-use planning principles are put forward to underpin both plan making and decision- taking, one of which is to “actively manage patterns of growth to make the fullest possible use of public transport, walking and cycling, and focus significant development in locations which are or can be made sustainable.”

4.3 Paragraphs 102 to 111 address the relationship between development and sustainable transport as follows: -

Promoting sustainable transport

102. Transport issues should be considered from the earliest stages of plan-making and development proposals, so that:

a) the potential impacts of development on transport networks can be addressed;

b) opportunities from existing or proposed transport, and changing transport technology and usage, are realised – for example in relation to the scale, location or density of development that can be accommodated;

c) opportunities to promote walking, cycling and public transport use are identified and pursued;

d) the environmental impacts of traffic and transport infrastructure can be identified, assessed, and taken into account – including appropriate opportunities for avoiding and mitigating any adverse effects, and for net environmental gains; and

e) patterns of movement, streets, parking, and other transport considerations are integral to the design of schemes and contribute to making high quality places.

103. The planning system should actively manage patterns of growth in support of these objectives. Significant development should be focused on locations which are or can be made sustainable, through limiting the need to travel and offering a genuine choice of transport modes. This can help to reduce congestion and emissions and improve air quality and public health. However, opportunities to maximise sustainable transport solutions will vary between urban

Les Henry Associates Limited 6 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

and rural areas, and this should be taken into account in both plan- making and decision-making.

104. Planning policies should:

a) support an appropriate mix of uses across an area, and within larger scale sites, to minimise the number and length of journeys needed for employment, shopping, leisure, education, and other activities;

b) be prepared with the active involvement of local highways authorities, other transport infrastructure providers and operators and neighbouring councils, so that strategies and investments for supporting sustainable transport and development patterns are aligned;

c) identify and protect, where there is robust evidence, sites and routes which could be critical in developing infrastructure to widen transport choice and realise opportunities for large scale development;

d) provide for high quality walking and cycling networks and supporting facilities such as cycle parking (drawing on Local Cycling and Walking Infrastructure Plans);

e) provide for any large-scale transport facilities that need to be located in the area, and the infrastructure and wider development required to support their operation, expansion, and contribution to the wider economy. In doing so they should take into account whether such development is likely to be a nationally significant infrastructure project and any relevant national policy statements; and

f) recognise the importance of maintaining a national network of general aviation airfields, and their need to adapt and change over time – taking into account their economic value in serving business, leisure, training and emergency service needs, and the Government’s General Aviation Strategy.

105. If setting local parking standards for residential and non-residential development, policies should take into account:

a) the accessibility of the development; b) the type, mix and use of development; c) the availability of and opportunities for public transport; d) local car ownership levels; and e) the need to ensure an adequate provision of spaces for charging plug-in and other ultra-low emission vehicles.

106. Maximum parking standards for residential and non-residential development should only be set where there is a clear and compelling justification that they are necessary for managing the

Les Henry Associates Limited 7 January 2021 Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

local road network, or for optimising the density of development in city and town centres and other locations that are well served by public transport (in accordance with chapter 11 of this Framework).

In town centres, local authorities should seek to improve the quality of parking so that it is convenient, safe, and secure, alongside measures to promote accessibility for pedestrians and cyclists.

107. Planning policies and decisions should recognise the importance of providing adequate overnight lorry parking facilities, taking into account any local shortages, to reduce the risk of parking in locations that lack proper facilities or could cause a nuisance. Proposals for new or expanded distribution centres should make provision for sufficient lorry parking to cater for their anticipated use.

Considering development proposals

108. In assessing sites that may be allocated for development in plans, or specific applications for development, it should be ensured that:

a) appropriate opportunities to promote sustainable transport modes can be – or have been – taken up, given the type of development and its location;

b) safe and suitable access to the site can be achieved for all users; and

c) any significant impacts from the development on the transport network (in terms of capacity and congestion), or on highway safety, can be cost effectively mitigated to an acceptable degree.

109. Development should only be prevented or refused on highways grounds if there would be an unacceptable impact on highway safety, or the residual cumulative impacts on the road network would be severe.

110. Within this context, applications for development should:

a) give priority first to pedestrian and cycle movements, both within the scheme and with neighbouring areas; and second – so far as possible – to facilitating access to high quality public transport, with layouts that maximise the catchment area for bus or other public transport services, and appropriate facilities that encourage public transport use;

b) address the needs of people with disabilities and reduced mobility in relation to all modes of transport;

c) create places that are safe, secure and attractive – which minimise the scope for conflicts between pedestrians, cyclists

Les Henry Associates Limited 8 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

and vehicles, avoid unnecessary street clutter, and respond to local character and design standards;

d) allow for the efficient delivery of goods, and access by service and emergency vehicles; and

e) be designed to enable charging of plug-in and other ultra-low emission vehicles in safe, accessible, and convenient locations.

111. All developments that will generate significant amounts of movement should be required to provide a travel plan, and the application should be supported by a transport statement or transport assessment so that the likely impacts of the proposal can be assessed.

4.4 Regional Policy

London Plan

Publication London Plan December 2020

The Mayor has formally approved a new London Plan, the ‘Publication London Plan’. It has been prepared to address the Secretary of State’s directions of the 13 March 2020 and 10 December 2020 to the Intend to Publish plan.

It has been sent to the Secretary of State (21st December 2020) for his consideration. He has up to 6 weeks to decide whether he is content for the Mayor to formally publish the Publication London Plan or apply for a further extension of time.

Once the Mayor has formally received confirmation from the Secretary of State that he is content for the Publication London Plan to be published, the Mayor will proceed with the final steps to publish the final London Plan. On publication it will become the Spatial Development Plan for London and part of the statutory Development Plan for Greater London.

TRANSPORT

Policy T1

Strategic approach to transport

A Development Plans should support, and development proposals should facilitate: 1) the delivery of the Mayor’s strategic target of 80 per cent of all trips in London to be made by foot, cycle or public transport by 2041 2) the proposed transport schemes set out in Table 10.1.

B All development should make the most effective use of land, reflecting its connectivity and accessibility by existing and future

Les Henry Associates Limited 9 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

public transport, walking and cycling routes, and ensure that any impacts on London’s transport networks and supporting infrastructure are mitigated.

Policy T2

Healthy Streets

A Development proposals and Development Plans should deliver patterns of land use that facilitate residents making shorter, regular trips by walking or cycling.

B Development Plans should:

1) promote and demonstrate the application of the Mayor’s Healthy Streets Approach to: improve health and reduce health inequalities; reduce car dominance, ownership and use, road danger, severance, vehicle emissions and noise; increase walking, cycling and public transport use; improve street safety, comfort, convenience and amenity; and support these outcomes through sensitively designed freight facilities.

2) identify opportunities to improve the balance of space given to people to dwell, walk, cycle, and travel on public transport and in essential vehicles, so space is used more efficiently and streets are greener and more pleasant.

C In Opportunity Areas and other growth areas, new and improved walking, cycling and public transport networks should be planned at an early stage, with delivery phased appropriately to support mode shift towards active travel and public transport. Designs for new or enhanced streets must demonstrate how they deliver against the ten Healthy Streets Indicators.

D Development proposals should:

1) demonstrate how they will deliver improvements that support the ten Healthy Streets Indicators in line with Transport for London guidance

2) reduce the dominance of vehicles on London’s streets whether stationary or moving

3) be permeable by foot and cycle and connect to local walking and cycling networks as well as public transport.

Les Henry Associates Limited 10 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Policy T3

Transport capacity, connectivity and safeguarding

A Development Plans should develop effective transport policies and projects to support the sustainable development of London and the Wider South East as well as to support better national and international public transport connections.

B Development Plans and development decisions should ensure the provision of sufficient and suitably located land for the development of the current and expanded public and active transport system to serve London’s needs, including by:

1) safeguarding existing land and buildings used for public transport, active travel or related support functions (unless alternative facilities are provided to the satisfaction of relevant strategic transport authorities and service providers that enable existing transport operations to be maintained and expanded if necessary)

2) identifying and safeguarding new sites/space and route alignments, as well as supporting infrastructure, to provide necessary strategic and local connectivity and capacity by public transport, walking and cycling, as well as to allow for sustainable deliveries and servicing

3) safeguarding London’s walking and cycling networks

C Development Plans should appropriately safeguard the schemes outlined in Table 10.1. Development proposals should provide adequate protection for and/or suitable mitigation to allow the relevant schemes outlined in Table 10.1 to come forward. Those that do not, or which otherwise seek to remove vital transport functions or prevent necessary expansion of these, without suitable alternative provision being made to the satisfaction of transport authorities and service providers, should be refused.

D In Development Plans and development decisions, particular priority should be given to securing and supporting the delivery of upgrades to Underground lines, Crossrail 2, the Bakerloo line extension, river crossings and an eastwards extension of the Elizabeth line. E Development proposals should support capacity, connectivity and other improvements to the bus network and ensure it can operate efficiently to, from and within developments, giving priority to buses and supporting infrastructure as needed.

Les Henry Associates Limited 11 January 2021 Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Policy T4

Assessing and mitigating transport impacts

A Development Plans and development proposals should reflect and be integrated with current and planned transport access, capacity and connectivity.

B When required in accordance with national or local guidance,179 transport assessments/statements should be submitted with development proposals to ensure that impacts on the capacity of the transport network (including impacts on pedestrians and the cycle network), at the local, network-wide and strategic level, are fully assessed. Transport assessments should focus on embedding the Healthy Streets Approach within, and in the vicinity of, new development. Travel Plans, Parking Design and Management Plans, Construction Logistics Plans and Delivery and Servicing Plans will be required having regard to Transport for London or Mayoral guidance.180

C Where appropriate, mitigation, either through direct provision of public transport, walking and cycling facilities and highways improvements or through financial contributions, will be required to address adverse transport impacts that are identified.

D Where the ability to absorb increased travel demand through active travel modes has been exhausted, existing public transport capacity is insufficient to allow for the travel generated by proposed developments, and no firm plans and funding exist for an increase in capacity to cater for the increased demand, planning permission will be contingent on the provision of necessary public transport and active travel infrastructure.

E The cumulative impacts of development on public transport and the road network capacity including walking and cycling, as well as associated effects on public health, should be taken into account and mitigated.

F Development proposals should not increase road danger.

Policy T5

Cycling

A Development Plans and development proposals should help remove barriers to cycling and create a healthy environment in which people choose to cycle. This will be achieved through:

1) supporting the delivery of a London-wide network of cycle routes, with new routes and improved infrastructure

Les Henry Associates Limited 12 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

2) securing the provision of appropriate levels of cycle parking which should be fit for purpose, secure and well-located. Developments should provide cycle parking at least in accordance with the minimum standards set out in Table 10.2 and Figure 10.2, ensuring that a minimum of two short-stay and two long-stay cycle parking spaces are provided where the application of the minimum standards would result in a lower provision.

B Cycle parking should be designed and laid out in accordance with the guidance contained in the London Cycling Design Standards. 182 Development proposals should demonstrate how cycle parking facilities will cater for larger cycles, including adapted cycles for disabled people.

C Development Plans requiring more generous provision of cycle parking based on local evidence will be supported.

D Where it is not possible to provide suitable short-stay cycle parking off the public highway, the borough should work with stakeholders to identify an appropriate on-street location for the required provision. This may mean the reallocation of space from other uses such as on street car parking. Alternatively, in town centres, adding the required provision to general town centre cycle parking is also acceptable. In such cases, a commuted sum should be paid to the local authority to secure provision.

E Where it is not possible to provide adequate cycle parking within residential developments, boroughs must work with developers to propose alternative solutions which meet the objectives of the standards. These may include options such as providing spaces in secure, conveniently located, on-street parking facilities such as bicycle hangers.

F Where the use class of a development is not fixed at the point of application, the highest potential applicable cycle parking standard should be applied.

Table 10.2 - Minimum cycle parking standards

Use Class C3- C4 dwellings

Long Stay 1 space per studio, 1.5 spaces per 1-bedroom dwelling 2 spaces per all other dwellings

Short-stay 5 to 40 dwellings: 2 spaces

Les Henry Associates Limited 13 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Policy T6.1

Residential parking

A New residential development should not exceed the maximum parking standards set out in Table 10.3. These standards are a hierarchy with the more restrictive standard applying when a site falls into more than one category.

B Parking spaces within communal car parking facilities (including basements) should be leased rather than sold. C All residential car parking spaces must provide infrastructure for electric or Ultra-Low Emission vehicles. At least 20 per cent of spaces should have active charging facilities, with passive provision for all remaining spaces.

D Outside of the CAZ, and to cater for infrequent trips, car club spaces may be considered appropriate in lieu of private parking. Any car club spaces should have active charging facilities.

E Large-scale purpose-built shared living, student accommodation and other sui generis residential uses should be car-free.

F The provision of car parking should not be a reason for reducing the level of affordable housing in a proposed development.

G Disabled persons parking should be provided for new residential developments. Residential development proposals delivering ten or more units must, as a minimum:

1) ensure that for three per cent of dwellings, at least one designated disabled persons parking bay per dwelling is available from the outset

3) demonstrate as part of the Parking Design and Management Plan, how an additional seven per cent of dwellings could be provided with one designated disabled persons parking space per dwelling in future upon request as soon as existing provision is insufficient. This should be secured at the planning stage.

H All disabled persons parking bays associated with residential development must:

1) be for residents’ use only (whether M4(2) or M4(3) dwellings)

2) not be allocated to specific dwellings, unless provided within the curtilage of the dwelling

3) be funded by the payment of a commuted sum by the applicant, if provided on-street (this includes a requirement to fund provision of electric vehicle charging infrastructure)

Les Henry Associates Limited 14 January 2021 Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

4) count towards the maximum parking provision for the development

5) be designed in accordance with the design guidance in BS8300vol.1

6) be located to minimise the distance between disabled persons parking bays and the dwelling or the relevant block entrance or lift core, and the route should be preferably level or where this is not possible, should be gently sloping (1:60- 1:20) on a suitable firm ground surface.

Table 10.3 - Maximum residential parking standards

Location Number of beds Maximum parking provision*

Outer London PTAL 2 – 3 3+ Up to 1 space per dwelling

(*Where Development Plans specify lower local maximum standards for general or operational parking, these should be followed)

Policy T9

Funding transport infrastructure through planning

A The Mayor will charge the Mayoral Community Infrastructure Levy (MCIL) to secure funding towards transport infrastructure of strategic importance such as Crossrail 2, and potentially other strategic transport infrastructure.

B In consultation with the Mayor, boroughs should identify a package of other strategically important transport infrastructure, as well as improvements to public realm, along with other funding streams to deliver them.

C Planning obligations (Section 106 agreements), including financial contributions, will be sought to mitigate impacts from development, which may be cumulative. Such obligations and contributions may include the provision of new and improved public transport services, capacity and infrastructure, the expansion of the London-wide cycle networks and supporting infrastructure, and making streets pleasant environments for walking and socialising, in line with the Healthy Streets Approach.

Les Henry Associates Limited 15 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

4.5 Local Policy

London Borough of Bromley – Local Plan

Bromley's Local Plan was adopted on 16th January 2019. It was examined under the 2012 National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) and the transition period of the 2018 NPPF.

The Local Plan sets out the planning policies, site allocations and land designations Borough-wide and is the central document in the Borough’s Development Plan. Other Development Plan documents comprise the Bromley Town Centre Area Action Plan, and Supplementary Planning Documents; currently Planning Obligations and Affordable Housing and the London Plan (2016). The London Plan forms part of the Development Plan for each of the London local planning authorities.

The Council’s decisions on planning applications should be taken in line with its development plan unless there are significant matters (material considerations) which indicate otherwise.

The following policies are particularly relevant to these proposals.

Policy 4

Housing Design

All new housing developments will need to achieve a high standard of design and layout whilst enhancing the quality of local places. Housing schemes will also need to respect local character, spatial standards, physical context, and density. The Council will expect all of the following requirements to be demonstrated:

a - The site layout, buildings and space around buildings are designed to a high quality, recognising as well as complimenting the qualities of the surrounding areas; b - Minimum space standards for dwellings as set out in Policy 3.5 and Table 3.3 of the London Plan and the London Plan Housing Supplementary Planning Guidance (as updated); c - The provision of sufficient external, private amenity space that is accessible and practical; d - The provision of appropriate play space in accordance with the Mayor’s Play and Informal Recreation SPG; e - Off-street parking that is well integrated within the overall design of the development; f - Density that has regard to the London Plan density matrix whilst respecting local character, including heritage; g - Layout that is designed to give priority to pedestrians and cyclists over the movement and parking of vehicles; h - Safety and security measures are included in the design and layout of buildings and public areas; i - Ninety percent of new housing meets Building Regulation requirement M4 (2) ‘accessible and adaptable dwellings; and

Les Henry Associates Limited 16 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

j - Ten percent of new housing meets Building Regulation requirement M4 (3) ‘wheelchair user dwellings’ i.e., is designed to be wheelchair accessible, or easily adaptable for residents who are wheelchair users.

Policy 30 Parking

The Council will normally require off-street parking spaces to be provided in new residential development in accordance with Table 1 set out below:

Table 1: Residential Parking Standards

Bromley Residential Parking Standards (per unit)

Parking for all other types of development is to be provided at levels set out in London Plan (LP) Table 6.2.

In addition to the above, developments must:

a. provide designated blue badge parking as per LP Table 6.2; b. meet minimum cycle parking standards as per LP Table 6.3; c. ensure 1 in 5 spaces have provision (both active and passive) for electric vehicle charge points; and d. make provision for a car club, if above the minimum Transport for London (TfL) threshold.

Where parking pressures are identified at and around key public transport interchanges, new parking proposals will be supported on the basis that they do not undermine policies to encourage walking, cycling and public transport use.

For development where servicing problems may arise, the Council will normally require off-street/rear servicing facilities.

Policy 31 Relieving Congestion

Any new development likely to be a significant generator of travel:

a - should be located in positions accessible or capable of being made accessible by a range of transport modes, including public transport, walking and cycling; b - will require the submission of a Transport Assessment, setting out the impacts of their development on the local transport network (and strategic road network where applicable) and the mitigation measures proposed to deal with the impacts;

Les Henry Associates Limited 17 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

c - will, where necessary, be required to enter into an agreement to submit and implement acceptable Travel Plans, Construction Logistics Plans, and Delivery and Servicing Plans; d - will need to incorporate or contribute to improvements to the highway network including traffic management measures that limit the significant impacts of the development and are designed to be sensitive to the surroundings; and e - encourages walking and cycling through the provision of suitable facilities (see Policy 33 Access for All)

Policy 32 Road Safety

The Council will consider the potential impact of any development on road safety and will ensure that it is not significantly adversely affected.

Policy 33 Access for All

The Council will:

a - require that proposals are designed to ensure ease of access and movement for people with disabilities, both physical and sensory; b - consider the potential impacts on people with disabilities, and pedestrians and will seek provision of crossing facilities, designated routes and other improvements to the pedestrian environment as appropriate; c - consider the potential impact on public transport services and their users, and will seek provision of and contributions to, suitable infrastructure improvements and other facilities, including highway works and bus shelters, services and railway station improvements where such works are necessary and related in scale and kind to the proposed development; and d - where appropriate, developments may be expected to contribute towards the cost of implementation of the strategic transport schemes either through the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) or S106 Agreements.

Policy 34 Highway Infrastructure Provision

In determining planning applications, The Council will:

a - require all development to be designed to ensure ease of access for people with disabilities or mobility impairments; b - consider proposals for new vehicle accesses and new or extended vehicle crossings subject to road safety requirements and their compliance with the Council's Vehicle Crossing guidelines. The following principles will be applied for new accesses:

Strategic routes: no direct access will normally be permitted;

All other classified roads: vehicle crossings will be permitted, subject to a road safety audit demonstrating acceptability to the Council, and;

Les Henry Associates Limited 18 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

The impact of vehicle crossings upon the availability of on-street parking will need to be considered.

c - Any vehicle crossing on the Transport for London Road Network (TLRN) will require approval from TfL, as highway authority for these roads. d - Require new residential roads suitable for adoption to be constructed as per the guidelines set out in its Design Manual for development (LBB) with contributions being sought to improve the nearby road network, where necessary, to support a proposed development. e - where appropriate, developments may be expected to contribute towards the cost of implementation of the strategic transport schemes either through the Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL) or S106 Agreements.

Les Henry Associates Limited 19 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

5.0 On-Street Car Parking Stress

5.1 Overnight car parking surveys in accordance with London Borough of Lambeth’s Car Parking Survey Methodology were carried out a 1am on Tuesday 14th July 2020 and at 4am on Thursday 16th July 2020.

5.2 The surveys have revealed an overnight car parking stress of between 94% and 96% over the survey period. There were no road works taking place in any of the surveyed streets but there was a skip positioned in front of 17 Mosslea Road during the times of the car parking surveys.

5.3 There were 8 and 11 on-street car parking spaces available respectively during the car parking surveys.

5.4 Details of the overnight car parking surveys are included at Appendix C.

Les Henry Associates Limited 20 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

6.0 Road Safety Audit

6.1 Despite there being no requirement under Local Plan Policies 32 Road Safety or 34 - Highway Infrastructure Provision, the Highway Authority insisted a Road safety Audit being undertaken in respect of the use of the existing site access onto an unclassified residential access road for the proposed residential development.

6.2 The Road Safety Audit identified no highway safety concerns in respect of the use of the existing access for the proposed development other than a comment suggesting the provision of waiting restrictions across the entrance to deter obstructive on-street car parking in Albert Road.

6.3 A copy of the Road Safety Audit report issued on 24th June 2020 is included at Appendix D and although the internal site layout has subsequently changed the site access arrangements are the same.

6.4 The designer’s response is also included at Appendix D.

Les Henry Associates Limited 21 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

7.0 Highways Implications

7.1 The industry standard TRICS database has been interrogated to establish the likely generation of vehicular trips that would be associated with the proposed development.

7.2 Whilst the database currently seems to have limited data for the size and type of development proposed in this location, a selection of sites providing private houses has been selected.

7.3 The selection of sites used would suggest the proposals would generate between 3 and 4 vehicle trips per AM and PM peak period respectively and 38 trips per day as summarised below.

7.4 Similarly, the TRICS database has a limited supply of sites that would be like the previous use on the site and therefore to show a possible comparison of the trips that could have or could in the future be generated by the site’s the extant land use and possible alternative land uses assuming a floor area of 350m² and a site are of 1000m².

7.5 An office use on the site merely utilising the existing floor space of the buildings would produce lower vehicle trips but would be a very inefficient use of the site.

7.6 A comparison of the vehicular traffic generated by the former, possible future land uses on the site and the proposed residential development are summarised in Table 1 below with the TRICS data provided in Appendix E.

7.7 The figures below show there would be no intensification of the number of vehicular traffic movements associated with the site during the normal highway network peaks and in some instances the proposals would generate less vehicular movements than an alternative permitted land use on the site.

AM Trip PM Trip Daily Trip AM PM Daily Development Rate Rate Rate Trips Trips Trips

6 Houses 0.529 0.606 6.332 3 4 38 Business Unit 0.608 0.877 7.147 6 9 71

Office 0.713 0.706 5.930 2 2 21

Car Repairs 1.954 2.816 25.633 7 10 90

Table 1: Comparison of Generated Traffic

7.8 A brief analysis of the “CRASMAP” website has identified there have been no reported vehicle collisions resulting in personal injuries during the 5-year period up to December 2020 which shows the existing highway layout and conditions are not intrinsically unsafe.

Les Henry Associates Limited 22 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

7.9 A Road Safety Audit carried out in July 2020 did not identify any areas of concern regarding the use of the existing site access to serve the proposed development.

7.10 The proposals would provide an off-street car parking space for each of the proposed dwellings that would all include an electric vehicle charging point.

7.11 The car parking provision accords with the Publication London Plan but there is some confusion with the car parking standard within the LB Bromley Local Plan that was published on 16th January 2019.

7.12 The Local Plan standard refers to two standards for 3-bedroom houses where they are with PTAL areas of 0 to 2* (1.5 spaces minimum) and PTAL areas 2* to 6a (1 space min and 1.5max).

7.13 However, the proposal site lies within an area with a PTAL of 2 and the Local Plan standard, unlike the London Plan provides no guidance as to the meaning of “ * ”.

7.14 The London Plan explains as follows: -

Maximum parking provision*

Outer London PTAL 2 – 3 3+bedrooms Up to 1 space per dwelling

(*Where Development Plans specify lower local maximum standards for general or operational parking, these should be followed)

7.15 The general inclination is therefore that lower car parking standards should be applied which aligns with policies aimed at reducing the use of motor cars and encouraging the use of sustainable modes of transport.

7.16 The overnight car parking surveys carried out in July 2020 show existing on street car parking stress is extremely high, being between 94% and 96% occupation.

7.17 However, Car Ownership data from the 2011 Census indicates an average car ownership in the area immediately surrounding the proposal site as being 1.05 car per house.

7.18 Car Ownership data for the Bromley Common and Keston Ward, middle and lower-level super output areas is summarised below in Table 2.

7.19 The Census data therefore indicates car ownership in the area immediately surrounding the proposal site is lower than the Bromley Common and Keston Ward and beyond the lower-level super output area.

7.20 The Census data provided in Appendix F also indicates approximately 15% of the houses in Bromley Common and Keston Ward do not own cars and

Les Henry Associates Limited 23 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

the middle and lower-level super output areas indicate levels of 16% and 19% of houses respectively not owning cars.

7.21 It is therefore likely that one house would not require a car parking space and therefore no overspill of car parking onto Albert Road and adjoining streets would not occur.

7.22 Future residents of the proposed houses will be aware of the existing on street car parking and the car parking restraint within the development and will choose the live at the proposal site with this in mind.

Average Car Area Ownership per House Ward 1.24 Middle Level 1.14 SOA Lower Level 1.05 SOA Average 1.14

Table 2 – Car Ownership

7.23 Access and egress to and from each of the car parking spaces can be satisfactorily achieved as is demonstrate in the vehicle tracking analyses provided at Appendix F.

7.24 Bicycle parking will be provided in accordance with London Plan and Local plan standards.

7.25 A Refuse and Recycling Management strategy will be produced and agreed with the Council’s Cleansing Department.

7.26 A Fire Safety and Emergency Access strategy will be agreed with the London Fire and Civil Defence Authority and will accord with Building Regulation requirements.

Les Henry Associates Limited 24 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

8.0 Refuse and Recycling Management

8.1 It is understood that residential properties in the locality are provided with wheeled bins for refuse and recycling purposes.

8.2 Separate bins are provided for “Food Waste”, “Plastic, Glass and Tins” and Paper & Cardboard”. Food waste is collected every week and the other regular collections for recycling every other week (Appendix H).

8.3 Residents are also able to subscribe to a Garden Waste collection services where a further wheeled bin is provided to the property and collections are undertaken every other week between March and November and every month between December and February. Alternatively, residents can purchase stickers to attach to sacks and book a garden waste collection.

8.4 BS 5906:2005 recommends that containers should not be wheeled more than 15m between the collection point and vehicle for 240 and 360 litre containers and a distance of 5m should be used unless unavoidable.

8.5 A suitable smooth surface should be provided for the purpose of collection of waste, avoiding steps, kerbs, or other obstructions. The gradient should not exceed 1:12.

8.6 The collection point for waste containers should not be more than 25 metres from the storage point wherever possible and should be as near to the front curtilage of the property with the adoptable highway as possible to avoid the need for collection operatives to come onto the property.

8.7 In most cases it should be possible to provide a collection point on the boundary of the property with the nearest adoptable standard surface. For shared private driveways, there should be a communal collection point nearest the highway and generally this collection point should not be more than 5 metres from the position where the waste collection vehicle will park to empty the bin.

8.8 Any communal collection points should have an appropriate arrangement in place for ongoing management and maintenance.

8.9 Where individual containers are provided, the householder is responsible for moving waste containers from the external storage point to the collection point, and the route from one to the other should have an appropriate hard surface with no steps, kerbs, or other obstructions. The route should be wide enough to ensure safe passage.

8.10 The applicant will negotiate a satisfactory arrangement with the Council’s Cleansing Department incorporating the above requirements to enable satisfactory refuse and recycling collections to be undertaken.

8.11 Future residents will be made aware of the requirements of the Council’s Refuse collection service and it is anticipated that these would be moved to a suitable collection point within 20m of the highway collection point at collection times.

Les Henry Associates Limited 25 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

9.0 Fire Safety and Emergency Access

9.1 The Building Regulations 2010 (2019 edition – for use in England) Approved Document B – Fire Safety sets out the requirements for “Access and facilities for the fire service” under Section B5.

Creating Access for Fire Engines

9.2 When a fire occurs and the alarm is raised, we expect the fire service to respond and arrive quickly.

The emergency services need three main conditions to be satisfied to successfully deal with a fire in a house:

a. Fire engines must be able to get close to the building; b. Firefighters and their equipment must be able to reach the fire’s location in the building; and c. An adequate supply of water, maintained at sufficient pressure, must be available to fight the fire.

9.3 As houses are usually classed as small buildings (that is, up to 2,000m² floor area with a top storey less than 11m high), only access to within 45m of every point of the building, or to 15% of its perimeter, is needed.

9.4 A wide range of fire engines are in use throughout the UK. They vary in height, length, and weight and, as such, require varying degrees of access. To ensure that these requirements are met, building control bodies and local fire safety authorities should be consulted early on when designing a new home to check that there are no restrictions to access.

9.5 Long, narrow access tracks or drives in rural areas can often be a problem. Access roads usually need:

a. To be at least 3.7m wide b. Surfaced and capable of carrying 12.5 tonnes. c. With gates at least 3.1m wide d. With passing areas or turning points every 20m. A hammerhead or a turning circular with 16.8m turning circle diameter is required if the drive or track is over 20m in length.

9.6 If this is not possible, some alternative considerations may be agreed to compensate.

9.7 Remote self-build projects could include their own fire hydrant. Extended from the water mains, they would provide a means by which fire fighters could connect hoses to a standpipe. Private hydrants should be positioned not more than 90m (hose length) from the external door.

9.8 External hydrants are usually ‘wet’ (permanently filled with water) rather than ‘dry’ (kept empty and filled by the fire brigade when they attend an incident).

Les Henry Associates Limited 26 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

9.9 A more common solution is to fit a domestic sprinkler system.

9.10 The requirements for Fire and Emergency access are therefore not a matter for Planning Permission but are covered by Building Regulations.

9.11 The applicant will therefore negotiate with the Fire Brigade and Building Regulation Department to establish a satisfactory means for emergency access and firefighting.

Les Henry Associates Limited 27 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

10.0 Conclusions

10.1 The proposals provide a satisfactory level of car and bicycle parking that accords with London and Local Plan standards.

10.2 Cars can satisfactorily access and egress the proposed car parking areas.

10.3 The traffic generated by the proposals will not intensify the use of the existing site access which has been subject of a Road Safety Audit where no highway safety concerns were raised.

10.4 Pedestrian access to the site is acceptable using the existing shared route into the site from Albert Road because of the low frequency of vehicular traffic and available width to accommodate both modes of transport.

10.5 Fire Safety and Emergency access strategies will be agreed with relevant parties and authorities.

10.6 A Refuse and Recycling Management Strategy will be negotiated and agreed with the Council’s Cleansing Department.

10.7 The proposed residential development is therefore acceptable on highway and transportation grounds.

Les Henry Associates Limited 28 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

APPENDIX A

Site Photographs

Les Henry Associates Limited 29 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Les Henry Associates Limited 30 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Les Henry Associates Limited 31 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Les Henry Associates Limited 32 January 2021

Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

Les Henry Associates Limited 33 January 2021 Proposed Residential Development – 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ

APPENDIX B

PTAL Calculation

Les Henry Associates Limited 34 January 2021

TRANSPORT FOR LONDON

PTAL output for Base Year Map key - PTAL 2 0 (W orst) 1a 53 Albert Rd, Bromley BR2 9PT, UK 1b 2 Easting: 542043, Northing: 167710 3 4 5 6a 6b (Best) Grid Cell: 24282 Map layers

Report generated: 23/07/2020 PTAL (cell size: 100m)

Calculation Parameters Day of Week M-F Time Period AM Peak Walk Speed 4.8 kph Bus Node Max. Walk Access Time (mins) 8 Bus Reliability Factor 2.0 LU Station Max. Walk Access Time (mins) 12 LU Reliability Factor 0.75 National Rail Station Max. Walk Access Time (mins) 12 National Rail Reliability Factor 0.75

Copyright TfL 2020 1 / 2 Calculation data Mode Stop Route Distance (metres) Frequency (vph) Walk Time (mins) SWT (mins) TAT (mins) EDF Weight AI Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 358 482.14 5 6.03 8 14.03 2.14 0.5 1.07 Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 61 482.14 4 6.03 9.5 15.53 1.93 0.5 0.97 Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 261 482.14 5 6.03 8 14.03 2.14 0.5 1.07 Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 320 482.14 5 6.03 8 14.03 2.14 0.5 1.07 Bus SOUTHBOROUGH LIBRARY 336 466.45 3 5.83 12 17.83 1.68 0.5 0.84 Bus SOUTHBOROUGH LIBRARY 208 466.45 5 5.83 8 13.83 2.17 1 2.17 Total Grid Cell AI: 7.18

Overnight Car Parking Surveys

Les Henry Associates Limited 37 January 2021

REDEVELOPMENT TO PROVIDE 6 x 3-BEDROOM HOUSES

69A ALBERT ROAD, BROMLEY, KENT BR2 9PZ

OVERNIGHT CAR PARKING SURVEYS

Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 Email: [email protected] Tel: 0775 246 2202 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

Contents

Page

1. Introduction 3

2. Site and Highway Characteristics 4

3. Existing site and Development Proposals 5

4. Conclusions 6

Appendix A Area Photographs 7

Appendix B PTAL Calculation 12

Appendix C Parking Survey Data 14

Appendix D 2011 Census Data 17

2 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

1.0 Introduction

1.1 The London Borough of Bromley have requested overnight car parking surveys to be carried out in support of the proposals to redevelop 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PT to provide 6 x 3-bedroom houses with 6 off-street car parking spaces.

1.2 This statement considers the parking implications for the proposed development and is presented in the following sections: -

a. Section 2 describes the existing local conditions, including accessibility by non-car modes; b. Section 3 describes the potential transport impact of the proposed development; c. Section 4 summarises the findings of this statement and draws its conclusions accordingly.

3 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

2.0 Site and Highway Characteristics

2.1 The application site is located to the rear of existing terraces houses on the northern side of Albert Road with an existing vehicular access to the site positioned between no’s 67 and 69 Albert Road.

2.2 Albert Road is an unclassified residential access road.

2.2 The are no yellow line waiting restrictions near the site entrance but there are marked out on-street car parking bays on Mosslea Road to the west which allow parking for permit holders between noon and 2pm Monday to Friday.

2.3 The application site has a PTAL of 2 (Poor) with 6 bus routes within the specified walking distances for PTAL calculation. (Appendix B).

Figure 1A – Site Location

2.4 Figure 1A above shows the site’s location in terms of the wider highway network.

2.5 Bus routes 358, 61, 261, 320, 336 and 208 are all reasonably accessible and provide links to Orpington, Crystal Palace, Chislehurst, Lewisham, Farnborough, Biggin Hill and Catford.

2.6 The surrounding highway network has good quality footways, carriageways, and street lighting.

4 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

3.0 Existing site and Development Proposals

3.1 The existing site comprises a former electrical contractor’s yard and warehouse buildings and has a vehicular access onto Albert Road between no’s 67 and 69 Albert Road.

3.2 The proposals are for the redevelopment of the site to provide 6 3-bedroom house with 6 off-street car parking bays.

3.3 Overnight car parking surveys in accordance with London Borough of Lambeth’s Car Parking Survey Methodology were carried out a 1am on Tuesday 14th July 2020 and at 4am on Thursday 16th July 2020.

3.4 The surveys have revealed an overnight car parking stress of between 94% and 96% over the survey period. There were no road works taking place in any of the surveyed streets but there was a skip positioned in front of 17 Mosslea Road during the times of the car parking surveys.

3.5 A brief analysis of the 2011 Census data for the area immediately surrounding the site would suggest the proposals would generate a demand for up to 6 cars to park. The type of properties in the area is predominantly terraced houses.

3.6 It is likely that future residents will be aware of the parking levels in the locality and will be content with a single off-street car parking space.

3.7 The proposals would provide a satisfactorily level of car parking and would not add to the existing high level of car parking stress.

5 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

4.0 Conclusions

4.1 The proposal site is well served by the local and wider highway network as well as having public transport, cycling and footway links available nearby.

4.2 The proposals would generate a minimal level of traffic that would be easily accommodated by the existing transport infrastructure without adverse impacts on capacity or safety.

4.3 The development will provide an adequate level of car parking with bicycle parking provided in accordance with the London Plan minimum standards.

4.4 The likely level of car parking generated by the proposals can be accommodated within the site and will not therefore have any adverse effects on highway safety or amenity.

4.5 It is evident that the existing transport infrastructure could accommodate all modes of the proposed development traffic adequately.

4.6 In conclusion, there are no parking reasons why the proposals should not receive planning permission.

6 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

APPENDIX A

Site Photographs

7 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

8 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

9 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

10 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

11 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

APPENDIX B

PTAL Calculation

12 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 TRANSPORT FOR LONDON

PTAL output for Base Year Map key - PTAL 2 0 (W orst) 1a BR2 9PT 1b 2 Albert Rd, Bromley BR2 9PT, UK 3 4 Easting: 541988, Northing: 167711 5 6a 6b (Best)

Grid Cell: 24281 Map layers

PTAL (cell size: 100m) Report generated: 24/07/2020

Copyright TfL 2020 1 / 2 Calculation data Mode Stop Route Distance (metres) Frequency (vph) Walk Time (mins) SWT (mins) TAT (mins) EDF Weight AI Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 358 355.66 5 4.45 8 12.45 2.41 0.5 1.21 Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 61 355.66 4 4.45 9.5 13.95 2.15 0.5 1.08 Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 208 355.66 5 4.45 8 12.45 2.41 1 2.41 Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 261 355.66 5 4.45 8 12.45 2.41 0.5 1.21 Bus BROMLEY COMMON THE CROWN 320 355.66 5 4.45 8 12.45 2.41 0.5 1.21 Bus SOUTHBOROUGH LIBRARY 336 532.92 3 6.66 12 18.66 1.61 0.5 0.8 Total Grid Cell AI: 7.91

APPENDIX C

Car Parking Survey Data

15 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 KEY: DISABLED BAY PERMIT PARKING BAYS VEHICLE ACCESS DOUBLE YELLOW LINE UNRESTRICTED KERBLINE ADVISORY WHITE LINE

El Sub Sta 79 74 67 55

35 43 72a 25 23 33 9 93 72 57.8m 58.7m BALFOUR ROAD

59.6m 70

BALFOUR ROAD 96

38 29

Garage 58

69a

24 46

1 13

MOSSLEA ROAD MOSSLEA 23 37 47 59 65 77 89

ALBERT ROAD SALISBURY

ALBERT ROAD 22

58.2m 2

34 36

84 34

ROAD

28a

13 2

29 43 59 63 69 75 87 99 111 VICTORIA ROAD 119

LB 16

VICTORIA ROAD

14 58.6m 24

50 54

66 Crown Court

1 to 6 to 1

7 to 12 to 7 98 112

12a

SCALE 1:1250 @ A3 Tuesday 14th July 2020 @ 0100hrs

Unrestricted (m) Spaces Parked Stress Permit Bays (m) Spaces Parked Stress Disabled (m) Spaces Parked Stress DYL (m) Spaces Parked Stress Total Spaces Parked Stress Albert Road(North) 244 48 46 96% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 17 0 0 0% 48 46 96% Albert Road (South) 250 49 46 94% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 15 0 0 0% 49 46 94% Mosslea Road (West) 0 0 0 0% 96 18 16 89% 5.5 1 1 100% 8 0 0 0% 19 17 89% Mosslea Road (East) 0 0 0 0% 83 15 17 113% 0 0 0 0% 22 0 0 0% 15 17 113% Salisbury Road (West) 114 22 22 100% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 21 0 0 0% 22 22 100% Salisbury Road (East) 151 29 27 93% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 29 27 93% Total 759 148 141 95% 179 33 33 100% 5.5 1 1 100% 83 0 0 0% 182 175 96%

Thursday 16th July 2020 @ 0400hrs

Unrestricted (m) Spaces Parked Stress Permit Bays (m) Spaces Parked Stress Disabled (m) Spaces Parked Stress DYL (m) Spaces Parked Stress Total Spaces Parked Stress Albert Road(North) 244 48 43 90% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 17 0 0 0% 48 43 90% Albert Road (South) 250 49 45 92% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 15 0 0 0% 49 45 92% Mosslea Road (West) 0 0 0 0% 96 18 18 100% 5.5 1 0 0% 8 0 0 0% 19 18 95% Mosslea Road (East) 0 0 0 0% 83 16 16 100% 0 0 0 0% 22 0 0 0% 16 16 100% Salisbury Road (West) 114 22 22 100% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 21 0 0 0% 22 22 100% Salisbury Road (East) 151 29 28 97% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% 29 28 97% Total 759 148 138 93% 179 34 34 100% 5.5 1 0 0% 83 0 0 0% 183 172 94% 69A Albert Road, Bromley, Kent BR2 9PZ – Car Parking Stress Surveys

APPENDIX D

2011 Census Data

18 Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 19 July 2020] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - lower layer area name E01000669 : Bromley 020C accomodation type All categories: Accommodation type

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 740 170 404 166 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 305 126 168 11 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 435 44 236 155

LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 19 July 2020] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - lower layer area name E01000669 : Bromley 020C accomodation type Whole house or bungalow

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 637 120 362 155 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 235 84 141 10 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 402 36 221 145

Road Safety Audit & Designer’s Response

Les Henry Associates Limited 57 January 2021 Albert Road Bickley Kent BR2 9PT

Proposed Development / Access

STAGE 1 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

Report No. EC/2020/06/LH1

June 2020

Prepared by:

EC ROAD SAFETY LIMITED

1 Draven Close Hayes, Bromley, Kent BR2 7PN United Kingdom

Tel:

Email: [email protected]

Web: www.ecroadsafety.co.uk AUTHORISATION SHEET

Client: LEFA Enterprises Limited

Project: Proposed Development / Access

Address: 69A Albert Road Bickley Kent BR2 9PT

PREPARED BY Name: Paul Nevard Position: Director – EC Road Safety Limited Date: 23 June 2020

AGREED BY Name: Vinny Rey Position: Traffic Engineer / Road Safety Auditor Date: 24 June 2020

AUTHORISED FOR ISSUE

Name: Paul Nevard Position: Director – EC Road Safety Limited Date: 24 June 2020

DISTRIBUTION

Issue No. Issued To Date Issued

1. Mr Les Henry – I.Eng, FIHE, MCIHT 24/06/2020

2. Office Copy 24/06/2020 CONTENTS Page

1. INTRODUCTION 4 - 5 1.1 General 4 1.2 Purpose of Scheme 5

2. PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED IN PREVIOUS ROAD SAFETY AUDITS 6

3. PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED AT THIS STAGE 1 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT 7 - 12 3.1 General 7 - 8 3.2 Local Alignment 9 3.3 Junctions 10 3.4 Non-Motorised User Provision 11 3.5 Road Signs, Carriageway Markings & Street Lighting 12

4. AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT 13

APPENDICES

A. List of documents and plans considered during this Stage 1 Road Safety Audit 14

B. Location of problems identified during this Stage 1 Road Safety Audit 15

RSA Stage 1 3 EC.2020.06.LH1 1. INTRODUCTION

1.1 General

1.1.1 EC Road Safety Limited has been commissioned by Les Henry Associates on behalf of their client LEFA Enterprises Limited to undertake a Stage 1 Road Safety Audit on the proposed redevelopment of a site located to the rear of 69A Albert Road. The site forms part of a former electrical contractors’ yard with an existing access located between 69A and 69 Albert Road. The access road would measure approximately 4.2m wide into the site, before the carriageway would increase to 5.0m. It is assumed this would form a shared surface as there is no indication of a dedicated footway within the site. The access road would serve 7 residential dwellings.

1.1.2 The scope of the audit relates to the proposed development and the use of the existing access located on Albert Road.

1.1.3 Albert Road is residential road subject to a 30mph speed limit. The road consists of terraced housing with limited off-street parking available. Parking on street is provided with limited restrictions on street. Footways are provided to each side of Albert Road, and street lighting is also present. A white bar access marking is provided to highlight the site access and prevent parking across the access point.

1.1.4 The Road Safety Audit Team (approved by Mr Les Henry) consisted of:

Paul Nevard MSc, BA (Hons) CMILT, MCIHT, MSoRSA Director – EC Road Safety Ltd RSA, Cert. Comp Principal Traffic Engineer Road Safety Audit Team Leader

Vinny Rey BEng (Hons) MCIHT, MSoRSA Traffic Engineer RSA, Cert. Comp Road Safety Audit Team Member

1.1.5 The Road Safety Audit Brief was issued by Les Henry to the Audit Team which consisted of the following:

• 1877(00)110_Proposed Ground Floor Plan_SKETCH • 1877(00)110_Transport Sketch

1.1.6 The Audit Team examined the Audit Brief and plans at the EC Road Safety office on Friday 19th June 2020 and the site was subsequently examined by Paul Nevard and Vinny Rey together in daylight hours between 13.30 and 14.00 hours, Monday 22nd June 2020. Due to the current Covid-19 situation the journey to the site was taken separately and social distancing rules and guidelines observed throughout the site visit. The weather during the daytime site visit was dry and bright with extended sunny spells. The carriageway was dry. Traffic flows were low at the time of the audit and vehicle speeds were also observed as being low.

1.1.7 The Road Safety Audit also comprised of an examination of the documents forming the Audit Brief supplied to the Road Safety Audit Team and are referenced in Appendix A of this report. The location of any problems raised can be found within the report,

RSA Stage 1 4 EC.2020.06.LH1 photographed for reference or referenced in Appendix B of this report. If no problems are identified, only a location plan will be provided for reference in Appendix B.

1.1.8 The terms of reference of the Road Safety Audit are as described in the Highways England General Principles and Scheme Governance General information GG 119 Road Safety Audit (formerly HD19/15). The Road Safety Audit Team has examined and reported only on the road safety implications of the scheme as presented and has not examined or verified the compliance of the designs to any other criteria. This Road Safety Audit has not considered structural safety or checked for compliance to standards. This safety audit does not perform any “Technical Check” function on these proposals. It is assumed that the Project Sponsor is satisfied that such a “Technical Check” has been successfully completed prior to requesting this safety audit.

1.1.9 This Road Safety Audit has been undertaken based on the Road Safety Audit Team's previous experience and knowledge in undertaking Accident Investigation, Road Safety Engineering and Road Safety Audits. No member of the Road Safety Audit Team has had any previous input to the design of the scheme. The audit has been carried out with the sole purpose of identifying any features of the design that could be removed or modified in order to improve the safety of the scheme. The problems identified have been noted in this report together with suggestions for safety improvements, which we recommend should be studied for implementation.

1.2 Purpose of Scheme

1.2.1 The purpose of the scheme is to provide several new dwellings to the development site with the intensified use of the existing access located from Albert Road.

RSA Stage 1 5 EC.2020.06.LH1 2. PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED IN PREVIOUS ROAD SAFETY AUDITS

No previous audits have been supplied to the Audit Team and the Audit Team believe that none have been produced.

RSA Stage 1 6 EC.2020.06.LH1

3. PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED AT THIS STAGE 1 ROAD SAFETY AUDIT

3.1 General

3.1.1 PROBLEM

Location: Turning head within development

Summary: Larger vehicles reversing along the access road and out of the development resulting in rear end shunt collisions.

Detail: The plans do not indicate any restrictions within the turning head located at the end of the access road. Consequently, it is likely that over flow parking, resident and/or visitors will park in the turning head of the development. This could prevent larger vehicles from being able to safely turn within the site and exit in a forward gear motion. Reversing along the access road and out of the development could lead to rear end shunts and compromise pedestrian / cyclist safety.

RECOMMENDATION

Waiting restrictions and/or a parking management plan to ensure that the turning head always remains free of parked vehicles.

RSA Stage 1 7 EC.2020.06.LH1 3.1.2 PROBLEM

Location: Parking Bay – Home 5

Summary: Restricted visibility could lead to side swipe, failure to give way type collisions and / or pedestrian injury.

Detail: A parked vehicle reversing from the allocated parking bay for Home 5 would have restricted visibility and sightlines. Drivers travelling along the access road may be unaware of a vehicle emerging from the bay which may lead to collisions. Whilst it is accepted speeds would be low within the development, the building line of dwelling 5 would restrict forward visibility posing a road safety risk. In addition, the location of the bay and two proposed properties adjacent would restrict turning movements making egress from the bay difficult to achieve in a single movement. This would lead to several forward and reversing manoeuvres which could put pedestrians within the site at risk of being struck.

RECOMMENDATION

Proposed bay should be relocated / redesigned to address the concerns.

RSA Stage 1 8 EC.2020.06.LH1 3.2 Local Alignment

No Problems identified in this category at this Stage.

RSA Stage 1 9 EC.2020.06.LH1 3.3 Junctions

3.3.1 PROBLEM

Location: Proposed development access – Albert Road

Summary: Parked vehicles restrict turning movements and visibility leading to side swipe and / or failure to give way type collisions.

Detail: The existing site access is located between two residential dwellings. Unrestricted on street parking to Albert Road means that parking is located very close to the site access on both sides. Parking overhanging the site access would result in difficulties for larger vehicles to turn into and out of the site which could result in side swipe type collisions. In addition, parking so close to the access restricts visibility splays for vehicles exiting the development which could result in failure to give way / head on type collisions with vehicles travelling along Albert Road who may be unaware of vehicles emerging form the development site.

RECOMMENDATION

Introduction of waiting restrictions to Albert Road facilitate turning movements for all types of vehicles and, ensure that adequate visibility and sightlines are always maintained for vehicles exiting the development.

RSA Stage 1 10 EC.2020.06.LH1 3.4 Non-Motorised User Provision

3.4.1 PROBLEM

Location: Parking Bay – Home 6

Summary: Parking bay location could result in pedestrian injury and compromise safety of those pushing prams or wheelchair bound.

Detail: The proposed parking bay is positioned on the bend of the access road for residential dwelling 6. The bay would be positioned extremely close to the dwelling and the front door and access to the property. The Audit Team was concerned regarding any parked vehicle creating an obstruction to the entry and exit from the dwelling. Those pushing a pram or those wheelchair bound may have difficulty gaining access to the dwelling or moving around any parked vehicle in the bay. This could result in trips and falls trying to pass the obstruction as they try to squeeze past any parked vehicle. The Audit Team was also concerned regarding the manoeuvres required to park the vehicle in the proposed bay, which could result in multiple turns or reversing manoeuvres that may be have detrimental impact on highway safety for pedestrians using the shared surface / access road.

RECOMMENDATION

Track plots to be provided to show how vehicles will use the designated bays within the development. Bay length should be increased to ensure clear and unobstructed access to the primary entrance of the dwellings.

RSA Stage 1 11 EC.2020.06.LH1 3.5 Road Signs, Carriageway Markings & Street Lighting

No Problems identified in this category at this Stage.

End of list of Problems identified and Recommendations offered in this Stage 1 Audit

RSA Stage 1 12 EC.2020.06.LH1 4. AUDIT TEAM STATEMENT

We certify that this audit has been carried out in accordance with GG 119.

AUDIT TEAM LEADER

Paul Nevard Signed:

EC Road Safety Ltd 1 Draven Close Hayes Bromley Kent BR2 7PN United Kingdom Date: 24/06/2020

AUDIT TEAM MEMBER

Vinny Rey Signed:

EC Road Safety Ltd 1 Draven Close Hayes Bromley Kent BR2 7PN United Kingdom Date: 24/06/2020

Tel:

Email: [email protected]

RSA Stage 1 13 EC.2020.06.LH1 APPENDIX A

List of documents and plans considered during this Stage 1 Road Safety Audit:

• 1877(00)110_Proposed Ground Floor Plan_SKETCH

• 1877(00)110_Transport Sketch

RSA Stage 1 14 EC.2020.06.LH1 APPENDIX B

Location of problems identified during this Stage 1 Road Safety Audit:

3.4.1

3.1.1 3.1.2

3.3.1

RSA Stage 1 15 EC.2020.06.LH1 Designers Response to Stage 1 Road Safety Audit (EC/2020/06/LH1) by EC Road Safety

1. Turning head within development

Summary: Larger vehicles reversing along the access road and out of the development resulting in rear end shunt collisions.

RECOMMENDATION: Waiting restrictions and/or a parking management plan to ensure that the turning head always remains free of parked vehicles.

DESIGNER’S RESPONSE: The area is clearly marked as a “Car turning area” and it is not envisaged larger vehicles such as refuse/recycling collection vehicles will enter the site. Signage will be positioned on and around the turning area to ensure it is kept clear of parked vehicles and available to allow vehicles to satisfactorily enter and leave the site in a forward direction.

Vehicle tracking diagrams will demonstrate all vehicles expected to enter the site will be able to execute satisfactory turning manoeuvres.

Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 Designers Response to Stage 1 Road Safety Audit (EC/2020/06/LH1) by EC Road Safety

2. Parking Bay – Home 5

Summary: Restricted visibility could lead to side swipe, failure to give way type collisions and/or pedestrian injury.

RECOMMENDATION Proposed bay should be relocated/redesigned to address the concerns.

DESIGNER’S RESPONSE: The layout has been revised to improve visibility.

Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 Designers Response to Stage 1 Road Safety Audit (EC/2020/06/LH1) by EC Road Safety

3. Proposed development access – Albert Road

Summary: Parked vehicles restrict turning movements and visibility leading to side swipe and / or failure to give way type collisions.

RECOMMENDATION Introduction of waiting restrictions to Albert Road facilitate turning movements for all types of vehicles and, ensure that adequate visibility and sightlines are always maintained for vehicles exiting the development.

DESIGNER’S RESPONSE: The carriageway in front the site access already has an advisory white line which deters car parking to a reasonable level and no problems with access have currently been observed. If required the length/extent of the white line could be increased and a “KEEP CLEAR” road marking installed. Waiting restrictions are not seen as being reasonable as this would be a remote section of restriction to monitor and enforce and also incur unreasonable expense to the applicant. Furthermore as stated above, larger vehicles are not anticipated to enter the site.

Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 Designers Response to Stage 1 Road Safety Audit (EC/2020/06/LH1) by EC Road Safety

4. Parking Bay – Home 6

Summary: Parking bay location could result in pedestrian injury and compromise safety of those pushing prams or wheelchair bound.

RECOMMENDATION Track plots to be provided to show how vehicles will use the designated bays within the development. Bay length should be increased to ensure clear and unobstructed access to the primary entrance of the dwellings.

DESIGNER’S RESPONSE: The layout has been revised to overcome this issue and vehicle tracking diagrams will demonstrate all vehicles expected to enter the site will be able to execute satisfactory turning manoeuvres.

Les Henry Associates Limited July 2020 APPENDIX C

Overnight Car Parking Surveys

Les Henry Associates Limited 37 January 2021 TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 1 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-839401-210114-0116 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 03 - RESIDENTIAL Category : A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED TOTAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 01 GREATER LONDON HG HARINGEY 1 days HO HOUNSLOW 1 days WF WALTHAM FOREST 1 days 02 SOUTH EAST HC HAMPSHIRE 3 days KC KENT 2 days WS WEST SUSSEX 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Primary Filtering selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: No of Dwellings Actual Range: 8 to 62 (units: ) Range Selected by User: 8 to 4334 (units: )

Parking Spaces Range: All Surveys Included

Parking Spaces per Dwelling Range: All Surveys Included

Bedrooms per Dwelling Range: All Surveys Included

Percentage of dwellings privately owned: All Surveys Included

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/12 to 08/10/20

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 1 days Tuesday 3 days Wednesday 2 days Thursday 2 days Friday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 9 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

This data displays the number of manual classified surveys and the number of unclassified ATC surveys, the total adding up to the overall number of surveys in the selected set. Manual surveys are undertaken using staff, whilst ATC surveys are undertaking using machines.

Selected Locations: Edge of Town Centre 2 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 3 Edge of Town 2 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 2

This data displays the number of surveys per main location category within the selected set. The main location categories consist of Free Standing, Edge of Town, Suburban Area, Neighbourhood Centre, Edge of Town Centre, Town Centre and Not Known.

Selected Location Sub Categories: Residential Zone 7 Village 1 High Street 1 TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 2 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

Secondary Filtering selection:

Use Class: C 3 9 days

This data displays the number of surveys per Use Class classification within the selected set. The Use Classes Order 2005 has been used for this purpose, which can be found within the Library module of TRICS®.

Population within 500m Range: All Surveys Included Population within 1 mile: 1,001 to 5,000 1 days 5,001 to 10,000 1 days 15,001 to 20,000 3 days 20,001 to 25,000 1 days 50,001 to 100,000 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 25,001 to 50,000 1 days 75,001 to 100,000 1 days 125,001 to 250,000 4 days 500,001 or More 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 2 days 1.1 to 1.5 6 days 1.6 to 2.0 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: Yes 4 days No 5 days

This data displays the number of surveys within the selected set that were undertaken at sites with Travel Plans in place, and the number of surveys that were undertaken at sites without Travel Plans.

PTAL Rating: No PTAL Present 6 days 3 Moderate 1 days 4 Good 1 days 5 Very Good 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys with PTAL Ratings. TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 3 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 HC-03-A-21 TERRACED & SEMI-DETACHED HAMPSHIRE PRIESTLEY ROAD BASINGSTOKE HOUNDMILLS Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 3 9 Survey date: TUESDAY 13/11/18 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 HC-03-A-22 MIXED HOUSES HAMPSHIRE BOW LAKE GARDENS NEAR EASTLEIGH BISHOPSTOKE Edge of Town Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 4 0 Survey date: WEDNESDAY 31/10/18 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 HC-03-A-23 HOUSES & FLATS HAMPSHIRE CANADA WAY LIPHOOK

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 6 2 Survey date: TUESDAY 19/11/19 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 HG-03-A-01 DETACHED & SEMI-DETACHED HARINGEY LAWRENCE ROAD TOTTENHAM WEST GREEN Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) High Street Total No of Dwellings: 2 0 Survey date: TUESDAY 05/11/19 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 HO-03-A-02 MIXED HOUSES HOUNSLOW HIBERNIAN ROAD HOUNSLOW

Edge of Town Centre Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 5 0 Survey date: MONDAY 29/06/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 KC-03-A-03 MIXED HOUSES & FLATS KENT HYTHE ROAD ASHFORD WILLESBOROUGH Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 5 1 Survey date: THURSDAY 14/07/16 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 KC-03-A-05 DETACHED & SEMI-DETACHED KENT ROCHESTER ROAD NEAR CHATHAM BURHAM Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Village Total No of Dwellings: 8 Survey date: FRIDAY 22/09/17 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 4 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

8 WF-03-A-02 SEMI DETACHED & TERRACED WALTHAM FOREST PALMERSTON ROAD WALTHAMSTOW

Edge of Town Centre Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 9 Survey date: THURSDAY 06/06/19 Survey Type: MANUAL 9 WS-03-A-05 TERRACED & FLATS WEST SUSSEX UPPER SHOREHAM ROAD SHOREHAM BY SEA

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total No of Dwellings: 4 8 Survey date: WEDNESDAY 18/04/12 Survey Type: MANUAL

MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES

Site Ref Reason for Deselection BN-03-A-03 Too many ES-03-A-03 Too many ES-03-A-04 Too many ES-03-A-05 Too many EX-03-A-02 Too many HF-03-A-03 Too many IW-03-A-01 Too many KC-03-A-04 Too many KC-03-A-06 Too many KC-03-A-07 Too many KC-03-A-08 Too many SC-03-A-04 Too many SC-03-A-05 Too many SC-03-A-06 Too many WS-03-A-07 Too many WS-03-A-08 Too many WS-03-A-09 Too many WS-03-A-10 Too many WS-03-A-11 Too many TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 5 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

TRIP RATE for Land Use 03 - RESIDENTIAL/A - HOUSES PRIVATELY OWNED TOTAL VEHICLES Calculation factor: 1 DWELLS Estimated TRIP rate value per 6 DWELLS shown in shaded columns BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated Time Range Days DWELLS Rate Trip Rate Days DWELLS Rate Trip Rate Days DWELLS Rate Trip Rate 00:00 - 01:00 01:00 - 02:00 02:00 - 03:00 03:00 - 04:00 04:00 - 05:00 05:00 - 06:00 06:00 - 07:00 07:00 - 08:00 9 36 0.073 0.440 9 36 0.361 2.165 9 36 0.434 2.605 08:00 - 09:00 9 36 0.138 0.826 9 36 0.391 2.349 9 36 0.529 3.175 09:00 - 10:00 9 36 0.162 0.972 9 36 0.205 1.229 9 36 0.367 2.201 10:00 - 11:00 9 36 0.147 0.881 9 36 0.190 1.138 9 36 0.337 2.019 11:00 - 12:00 9 36 0.171 1.028 9 36 0.183 1.101 9 36 0.354 2.129 12:00 - 13:00 9 36 0.177 1.064 9 36 0.174 1.046 9 36 0.351 2.110 13:00 - 14:00 9 36 0.208 1.248 9 36 0.226 1.358 9 36 0.434 2.606 14:00 - 15:00 9 36 0.131 0.789 9 36 0.174 1.046 9 36 0.305 1.835 15:00 - 16:00 9 36 0.242 1.450 9 36 0.205 1.229 9 36 0.447 2.679 16:00 - 17:00 9 36 0.327 1.963 9 36 0.138 0.826 9 36 0.465 2.789 17:00 - 18:00 9 36 0.404 2.422 9 36 0.202 1.211 9 36 0.606 3.633 18:00 - 19:00 9 36 0.349 2.092 9 36 0.177 1.064 9 36 0.526 3.156 19:00 - 20:00 3 26 0.304 1.823 3 26 0.266 1.595 3 26 0.570 3.418 20:00 - 21:00 3 26 0.329 1.975 3 26 0.278 1.671 3 26 0.607 3.646 21:00 - 22:00 22:00 - 23:00 23:00 - 24:00 Total Rates: 3.162 1 8.973 3.170 1 9.028 6.332 3 8.001

This section displays the trip rate results based on the selected set of surveys and the selected count type (shown just above the table). It is split by three main columns, representing arrivals trips, departures trips, and total trips (arrivals plus departures). Within each of these main columns are three sub-columns. These display the number of survey days where count data is included (per time period), the average value of the selected trip rate calculation parameter (per time period), and the trip rate result (per time period). Total trip rates (the sum of the column) are also displayed at the foot of the table.

To obtain a trip rate, the average (mean) trip rate parameter value (TRP) is first calculated for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. The average (mean) number of arrivals, departures or totals (whichever applies) is also calculated (COUNT) for all selected survey days that have count data available for the stated time period. Then, the average count is divided by the average trip rate parameter value, and multiplied by the stated calculation factor (shown just above the table and abbreviated here as FACT). So, the method is: COUNT/TRP*FACT. Trip rates are then rounded to 3 decimal places.

The survey data, graphs and all associated supporting information, contained within the TRICS Database are published by TRICS Consortium Limited ("the Company") and the Company claims copyright and database rights in this published work. The Company authorises those who possess a current TRICS licence to access the TRICS Database and copy the data contained within the TRICS Database for the licence holders' use only. Any resulting copy must retain all copyrights and other proprietary notices, and any disclaimer contained thereon.

The Company accepts no responsibility for loss which may arise from reliance on data contained in the TRICS Database. [No warranty of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the data contained in the TRICS Database.]

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 8 - 62 (units: ) Survey date date range: 01/01/12 - 08/10/20 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 9 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys automatically removed from selection: 7 Surveys manually removed from selection: 19

This section displays a quick summary of some of the data filtering selections made by the TRICS® user. The trip rate calculation parameter range of all selected surveys is displayed first, followed by the range of minimum and maximum survey dates selected by the user. Then, the total number of selected weekdays and weekend days in the selected set of surveys are show. Finally, the number of survey days that have been manually removed from the selected set outside of the standard filtering procedure are displayed. TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 1 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-839401-210114-0127 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 02 - EMPLOYMENT Category : B - BUSINESS PARK TOTAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 01 GREATER LONDON BK BARKING 1 days HO HOUNSLOW 1 days NH NEWHAM 1 days TH TOWER HAMLETS 1 days WF WALTHAM FOREST 1 days 02 SOUTH EAST EX ESSEX 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Primary Filtering selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 1200 to 6589 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 1200 to 185000 (units: sqm)

Parking Spaces Range: All Surveys Included

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/12 to 07/09/20

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 3 days Friday 3 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 6 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Town Centre 1 Edge of Town Centre 1 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 3 Edge of Town 1

Selected Location Sub Categories: Industrial Zone 3 Residential Zone 1 Built-Up Zone 2

This data displays the number of surveys per location sub-category within the selected set. The location sub-categories consist of Commercial Zone, Industrial Zone, Development Zone, Residential Zone, Retail Zone, Built-Up Zone, Village, Out of Town, High Street and No Sub Category. TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 2 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

Secondary Filtering selection:

Use Class: Not Known 1 days B 1 5 days

Filter by Use Class Breakdown: All Surveys Included

Population within 500m Range: All Surveys Included Population within 1 mile: 10,001 to 15,000 2 days 50,001 to 100,000 4 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 125,001 to 250,000 1 days 500,001 or More 5 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.6 to 1.0 4 days 1.1 to 1.5 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 6 days

PTAL Rating: No PTAL Present 1 days 2 Poor 2 days 4 Good 1 days 5 Very Good 1 days 6b (High) Excellent 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys with PTAL Ratings.

Covid-19 Restrictions Yes At least one survey within the selected data set was undertaken at a time of Covid-19 restrictions TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 3 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 BK-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK BARKING FRESHWATER ROAD DAGENHAM CHADWELL HEATH Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 2 5 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 06/10/14 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 EX-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK ESSEX BRUNEL COURT COLCHESTER SEVERALLS INDUSTRIAL PK Edge of Town Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 9 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 18/05/18 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 HO-02-B-02 BUSINESS PARK HOUNSLOW HANWORTH ROAD LONDON HOUNSLOW Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 2 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 08/11/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 NH-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK NEWHAM ROMFORD ROAD STRATFORD

Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 3 5 0 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 15/11/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 TH-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK TOWER HAMLETS PRESTONS ROAD POPLAR

Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 6 5 8 9 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 07/09/20 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 WF-02-B-01 BUSINESS PARK WALTHAM FOREST ARGALL WAY WALTHAMSTOW

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 1 4 8 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 06/11/17 Survey Type: MANUAL

MANUALLY DESELECTED SITES

Site Ref Reason for Deselection BT-02-B-01 Too Big EX-02-B-02 Too Big HC-02-B-02 Too Big HD-02-B-06 Too Big HM-02-B-01 Too Big HO-02-B-04 Too Big SC-02-B-03 Too Big WG-02-B-02 Too Big TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 4 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

TRIP RATE for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/B - BUSINESS PARK TOTAL VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm Estimated TRIP rate value per 1000 SQM shown in shaded columns BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated Time Range Days GFA Rate Trip Rate Days GFA Rate Trip Rate Days GFA Rate Trip Rate 00:00 - 00:30 00:30 - 01:00 01:00 - 01:30 01:30 - 02:00 02:00 - 02:30 02:30 - 03:00 03:00 - 03:30 03:30 - 04:00 04:00 - 04:30 04:30 - 05:00 05:00 - 05:30 05:30 - 06:00 06:00 - 06:30 06:30 - 07:00 07:00 - 07:30 6 3098 0.075 0.753 6 3098 0.011 0.108 6 3098 0.086 0.861 07:30 - 08:00 6 3098 0.269 2.690 6 3098 0.070 0.699 6 3098 0.339 3.389 08:00 - 08:30 6 3098 0.231 2.313 6 3098 0.070 0.699 6 3098 0.301 3.012 08:30 - 09:00 6 3098 0.377 3.766 6 3098 0.156 1.560 6 3098 0.533 5.326 09:00 - 09:30 6 3098 0.307 3.067 6 3098 0.140 1.399 6 3098 0.447 4.466 09:30 - 10:00 6 3098 0.237 2.367 6 3098 0.113 1.130 6 3098 0.350 3.497 10:00 - 10:30 6 3098 0.113 1.130 6 3098 0.118 1.184 6 3098 0.231 2.314 10:30 - 11:00 6 3098 0.172 1.722 6 3098 0.086 0.861 6 3098 0.258 2.583 11:00 - 11:30 6 3098 0.151 1.506 6 3098 0.124 1.237 6 3098 0.275 2.743 11:30 - 12:00 6 3098 0.210 2.098 6 3098 0.145 1.453 6 3098 0.355 3.551 12:00 - 12:30 6 3098 0.108 1.076 6 3098 0.172 1.722 6 3098 0.280 2.798 12:30 - 13:00 6 3098 0.129 1.291 6 3098 0.113 1.130 6 3098 0.242 2.421 13:00 - 13:30 6 3098 0.124 1.237 6 3098 0.129 1.291 6 3098 0.253 2.528 13:30 - 14:00 6 3098 0.204 2.044 6 3098 0.145 1.453 6 3098 0.349 3.497 14:00 - 14:30 6 3098 0.156 1.560 6 3098 0.108 1.076 6 3098 0.264 2.636 14:30 - 15:00 6 3098 0.113 1.130 6 3098 0.183 1.829 6 3098 0.296 2.959 15:00 - 15:30 6 3098 0.102 1.022 6 3098 0.140 1.399 6 3098 0.242 2.421 15:30 - 16:00 6 3098 0.108 1.076 6 3098 0.156 1.560 6 3098 0.264 2.636 16:00 - 16:30 6 3098 0.135 1.345 6 3098 0.161 1.614 6 3098 0.296 2.959 16:30 - 17:00 6 3098 0.124 1.237 6 3098 0.344 3.443 6 3098 0.468 4.680 17:00 - 17:30 6 3098 0.065 0.646 6 3098 0.344 3.443 6 3098 0.409 4.089 17:30 - 18:00 6 3098 0.054 0.538 6 3098 0.264 2.636 6 3098 0.318 3.174 18:00 - 18:30 6 3098 0.022 0.215 6 3098 0.167 1.668 6 3098 0.189 1.883 18:30 - 19:00 6 3098 0.005 0.054 6 3098 0.097 0.968 6 3098 0.102 1.022 19:00 - 19:30 19:30 - 20:00 20:00 - 20:30 20:30 - 21:00 21:00 - 21:30 21:30 - 22:00 22:00 - 22:30 22:30 - 23:00 23:00 - 23:30 23:30 - 24:00 Total Rates: 3.591 3 5.883 3.556 3 5.562 7.147 7 1.445

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 1200 - 6589 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/12 - 07/09/20 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 6 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys automatically removed from selection: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 8

TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 02 - EMPLOYMENT Category : A - OFFICE TOTAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 01 GREATER LONDON BT BRENT 2 days CI CITY OF LONDON 2 days CN CAMDEN 1 days HD HILLINGDON 1 days HM HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM 1 days HO HOUNSLOW 1 days KN KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA 1 days LB LAMBETH 2 days TH TOWER HAMLETS 1 days WH WANDSWORTH 2 days 02 SOUTH EAST BD BEDFORDSHIRE 1 days ES EAST SUSSEX 3 days EX ESSEX 1 days HC HAMPSHIRE 1 days HF HERTFORDSHIRE 2 days SO SLOUGH 2 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Primary Filtering selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 186 to 120000 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 350 to 1000 (units: sqm)

Parking Spaces Range: All Surveys Included

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/12 to 05/11/19

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Monday 6 days Tuesday 3 days Wednesday 7 days Thursday 5 days Friday 2 days Saturday 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 24 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Town Centre 8 Edge of Town Centre 8 Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 6 Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) 2

Selected Location Sub Categories: Commercial Zone 3 Development Zone 2 Residential Zone 3 Built-Up Zone 10 High Street 3 No Sub Category 3 TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 2 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

Secondary Filtering selection:

Use Class: A 1 1 days B 1 23 days

Filter by Use Class Breakdown: All Surveys Included

Population within 500m Range: All Surveys Included Population within 1 mile: 10,001 to 15,000 1 days 15,001 to 20,000 1 days 25,001 to 50,000 10 days 50,001 to 100,000 8 days 100,001 or More 4 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 75,001 to 100,000 2 days 125,001 to 250,000 6 days 250,001 to 500,000 3 days 500,001 or More 13 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 0.5 or Less 4 days 0.6 to 1.0 13 days 1.1 to 1.5 6 days 1.6 to 2.0 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: Yes 10 days No 14 days

PTAL Rating: No PTAL Present 10 days 1b Very poor 1 days 4 Good 3 days 5 Very Good 3 days 6a Excellent 2 days 6b (High) Excellent 5 days

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 BD-02-A-03 OFFICES BEDFORDSHIRE BROMHAM ROAD BEDFORD

Edge of Town Centre No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 1 4 6 9 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 14/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 BT-02-A-03 OFFICES BRENT EMPIRE WAY WEMBLEY

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Development Zone Total Gross floor area: 9 2 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 03/06/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 3 BT-02-A-04 OFFICES BRENT EMPIRE WAY WEMBLEY

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Development Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 0 6 2 5 sqm Survey date: SATURDAY 16/05/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 4 CI-02-A-02 OFFICES CITY OF LONDON GRACECHURCH STREET CITY OF LONDON MONUMENT Town Centre Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 9 8 0 3 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 29/11/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 5 CI-02-A-03 OFFICES CITY OF LONDON MONUMENT STREET CITY OF LONDON MONUMENT Town Centre Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 9 5 1 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 29/11/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 6 CN-02-A-03 PLANNING & ENGINEERING CAMDEN FITZROY STREET FITZROVIA

Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 6 6 3 9 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 06/12/17 Survey Type: MANUAL 7 ES-02-A-11 HOUSING COMPANY EAST SUSSEX THE SIDINGS HASTINGS ORE VALLEY Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 8 6 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 17/11/15 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 4 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

8 ES-02-A-12 COUNCIL OFFICES EAST SUSSEX VICARAGE LANE HAILSHAM

Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 3 6 4 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 26/11/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 9 ES-02-A-13 OFFICES EAST SUSSEX ROMAN ROAD HOVE

Edge of Town Centre Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 8 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 04/07/18 Survey Type: MANUAL 10 EX-02-A-03 HMRC ESSEX VICTORIA AVENUE SOUTHEND-ON-SEA

Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 4 5 0 0 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 23/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 11 HC-02-A-12 HMRC HAMPSHIRE NORTHERN ROAD PORTSMOUTH COSHAM Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 1 0 1 0 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 23/11/15 Survey Type: MANUAL 12 HD-02-A-09 DATA CENTRE HILLINGDON MILLINGTON ROAD HAYES

Edge of Town Centre Commercial Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 2 1 0 0 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 26/06/18 Survey Type: MANUAL 13 HF-02-A-03 OFFICE HERTFORDSHIRE 60 VICTORIA STREET ST ALBANS

Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 6 1 0 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 16/10/13 Survey Type: MANUAL 14 HF-02-A-04 OFFICES HERTFORDSHIRE STATION WAY ST ALBANS

Edge of Town Centre Residential Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 0 0 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 02/10/14 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 5 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

15 HM-02-A-01 REGUS OFFICES HAMMERSMITH AND FULHAM QUEEN CAROLINE STREET HAMMERSMITH

Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 0 3 6 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 13/11/17 Survey Type: MANUAL 16 HO-02-A-01 SKY HEADQUARTERS HOUNSLOW SYON LANE ISLEWORTH

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) No Sub Category Total Gross floor area: 120000 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 05/07/17 Survey Type: MANUAL 17 KN-02-A-01 FRUIT DRINKS COMPANY KENSINGTON AND CHELSEA LADBROKE GROVE KENSAL GREEN

Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 2 5 5 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 17/06/19 Survey Type: MANUAL 18 LB-02-A-01 START UP OFFICES & STUDIOS LAMBETH DURHAM STREET VAUXHALL

Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 0 2 0 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 19/11/18 Survey Type: MANUAL 19 LB-02-A-02 MUSIC COMPANY LAMBETH STREATHAM HIGH ROAD STREATHAM

Town Centre High Street Total Gross floor area: 3 0 5 4 sqm Survey date: TUESDAY 05/11/19 Survey Type: MANUAL 20 SO-02-A-01 COUNCIL OFFICES SLOUGH HIGH STREET SLOUGH

Town Centre High Street Total Gross floor area: 1 8 0 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 27/02/14 Survey Type: MANUAL 21 SO-02-A-02 COUNCIL OFFICES SLOUGH BATH ROAD SLOUGH

Edge of Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 0 5 0 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 27/02/14 Survey Type: MANUAL TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 6 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters (Cont.)

22 TH-02-A-01 OFFICE SPACE FOR RENT TOWER HAMLETS CAMBRIDGE HEATH ROAD BETHNAL GREEN

Neighbourhood Centre (PPS6 Local Centre) High Street Total Gross floor area: 7 0 4 9 sqm Survey date: WEDNESDAY 06/03/19 Survey Type: MANUAL 23 WH-02-A-02 OFFICES WANDSWORTH BATTERSEA PARK ROAD BATTERSEA

Town Centre Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 2 1 5 sqm Survey date: THURSDAY 10/05/12 Survey Type: MANUAL 24 WH-02-A-03 O F F I C E WANDSWORTH BROUGHTON STREET NINE ELMS

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Built-Up Zone Total Gross floor area: 1 4 0 0 sqm Survey date: MONDAY 16/11/15 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 7 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

TRIP RATE for Land Use 02 - EMPLOYMENT/A - OFFICE TOTAL VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm Estimated TRIP rate value per 350 SQM shown in shaded columns BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

ARRIVALS DEPARTURES TOTALS No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated No. Ave. Trip Estimated Time Range Days GFA Rate Trip Rate Days GFA Rate Trip Rate Days GFA Rate Trip Rate 00:00 - 00:30 00:30 - 01:00 01:00 - 01:30 01:30 - 02:00 02:00 - 02:30 02:30 - 03:00 03:00 - 03:30 03:30 - 04:00 04:00 - 04:30 04:30 - 05:00 05:00 - 05:30 05:30 - 06:00 06:00 - 06:30 2 65050 0.158 0.554 2 65050 0.020 0.070 2 65050 0.178 0.624 06:30 - 07:00 2 65050 0.244 0.853 2 65050 0.042 0.145 2 65050 0.286 0.998 07:00 - 07:30 24 11766 0.180 0.631 24 11766 0.021 0.074 24 11766 0.201 0.705 07:30 - 08:00 24 11766 0.262 0.918 24 11766 0.026 0.090 24 11766 0.288 1.008 08:00 - 08:30 24 11766 0.304 1.063 24 11766 0.029 0.103 24 11766 0.333 1.166 08:30 - 09:00 24 11766 0.340 1.189 24 11766 0.040 0.140 24 11766 0.380 1.329 09:00 - 09:30 24 11766 0.282 0.988 24 11766 0.052 0.181 24 11766 0.334 1.169 09:30 - 10:00 24 11766 0.197 0.688 24 11766 0.052 0.182 24 11766 0.249 0.870 10:00 - 10:30 24 11766 0.108 0.379 24 11766 0.060 0.209 24 11766 0.168 0.588 10:30 - 11:00 24 11766 0.071 0.249 24 11766 0.052 0.181 24 11766 0.123 0.430 11:00 - 11:30 24 11766 0.053 0.185 24 11766 0.046 0.161 24 11766 0.099 0.346 11:30 - 12:00 24 11766 0.063 0.219 24 11766 0.048 0.169 24 11766 0.111 0.388 12:00 - 12:30 24 11766 0.062 0.216 24 11766 0.066 0.231 24 11766 0.128 0.447 12:30 - 13:00 24 11766 0.063 0.221 24 11766 0.067 0.235 24 11766 0.130 0.456 13:00 - 13:30 24 11766 0.058 0.203 24 11766 0.059 0.207 24 11766 0.117 0.410 13:30 - 14:00 24 11766 0.055 0.192 24 11766 0.064 0.223 24 11766 0.119 0.415 14:00 - 14:30 24 11766 0.049 0.170 24 11766 0.056 0.197 24 11766 0.105 0.367 14:30 - 15:00 24 11766 0.049 0.172 24 11766 0.085 0.299 24 11766 0.134 0.471 15:00 - 15:30 24 11766 0.038 0.131 24 11766 0.126 0.442 24 11766 0.164 0.573 15:30 - 16:00 24 11766 0.046 0.162 24 11766 0.148 0.518 24 11766 0.194 0.680 16:00 - 16:30 24 11766 0.040 0.139 24 11766 0.234 0.821 24 11766 0.274 0.960 16:30 - 17:00 24 11766 0.037 0.130 24 11766 0.229 0.803 24 11766 0.266 0.933 17:00 - 17:30 24 11766 0.036 0.126 24 11766 0.343 1.200 24 11766 0.379 1.326 17:30 - 18:00 24 11766 0.033 0.117 24 11766 0.294 1.030 24 11766 0.327 1.147 18:00 - 18:30 24 11766 0.023 0.079 24 11766 0.166 0.581 24 11766 0.189 0.660 18:30 - 19:00 24 11766 0.027 0.095 24 11766 0.109 0.383 24 11766 0.136 0.478 19:00 - 19:30 1 120000 0.027 0.093 1 120000 0.117 0.408 1 120000 0.144 0.501 19:30 - 20:00 1 120000 0.020 0.070 1 120000 0.110 0.385 1 120000 0.130 0.455 20:00 - 20:30 1 120000 0.021 0.073 1 120000 0.058 0.204 1 120000 0.079 0.277 20:30 - 21:00 1 120000 0.015 0.052 1 120000 0.031 0.108 1 120000 0.046 0.160 21:00 - 21:30 1 120000 0.031 0.108 1 120000 0.039 0.137 1 120000 0.070 0.245 21:30 - 22:00 1 120000 0.017 0.058 1 120000 0.033 0.114 1 120000 0.050 0.172 22:00 - 22:30 22:30 - 23:00 23:00 - 23:30 23:30 - 24:00 Total Rates: 3.009 1 0.523 2.922 1 0.231 5.931 2 0.754

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 186 - 120000 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/12 - 05/11/19 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 24 Number of Saturdays: 1 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys automatically removed from selection: 5 Surveys manually removed from selection: 0

Calculation Reference: AUDIT-839401-210114-0142 TRIP RATE CALCULATION SELECTION PARAMETERS:

Land Use : 15 - VEHICLE SERVICES Category : A - VEHICLE REPAIR GARAGE (SLOW FIT) TOTAL VEHICLES

Selected regions and areas: 02 SOUTH EAST HF HERTFORDSHIRE 1 days WN WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD 1 days

This section displays the number of survey days per TRICS® sub-region in the selected set

Primary Filtering selection:

This data displays the chosen trip rate parameter and its selected range. Only sites that fall within the parameter range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Parameter: Gross floor area Actual Range: 290 to 580 (units: sqm) Range Selected by User: 290 to 875 (units: sqm)

Parking Spaces Range: All Surveys Included

Public Transport Provision: Selection by: Include all surveys

Date Range: 01/01/12 to 28/06/19

This data displays the range of survey dates selected. Only surveys that were conducted within this date range are included in the trip rate calculation.

Selected survey days: Friday 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys by day of the week.

Selected survey types: Manual count 2 days Directional ATC Count 0 days

Selected Locations: Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) 1 Edge of Town 1

Selected Location Sub Categories: Industrial Zone 2

Secondary Filtering selection:

Use Class: n / a 1 days Not Known 1 days

Population within 500m Range: All Surveys Included TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 2 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

Secondary Filtering selection (Cont.):

Population within 1 mile: 10,001 to 15,000 1 days 25,001 to 50,000 1 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 1-mile radii of population.

Population within 5 miles: 125,001 to 250,000 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated 5-mile radii of population.

Car ownership within 5 miles: 1.1 to 1.5 2 days

This data displays the number of selected surveys within stated ranges of average cars owned per residential dwelling, within a radius of 5-miles of selected survey sites.

Travel Plan: No 2 days

PTAL Rating: No PTAL Present 2 days

LIST OF SITES relevant to selection parameters

1 HF-15-A-01 GARAGE HERTFORDSHIRE LEYDEN ROAD STEVENAGE

Edge of Town Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 2 9 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 28/06/19 Survey Type: MANUAL 2 WN-15-A-01 GARAGE WINDSOR & MAIDENHEAD CORDWALLIS STREET MAIDENHEAD

Suburban Area (PPS6 Out of Centre) Industrial Zone Total Gross floor area: 5 8 0 sqm Survey date: FRIDAY 23/11/12 Survey Type: MANUAL

This section provides a list of all survey sites and days in the selected set. For each individual survey site, it displays a unique site reference code and site address, the selected trip rate calculation parameter and its value, the day of the week and date of each survey, and whether the survey was a manual classified count or an ATC count. TRICS 7.7.4 161220 B20.07 Database right of TRICS Consortium Limited, 2021. All rights reserved Thursday 14/01/21 Page 4 OFF-LINE VERSION Les Henry Associates Limited Greenwich London Licence No: 839401

TRIP RATE for Land Use 15 - VEHICLE SERVICES/A - VEHICLE REPAIR GARAGE (SLOW FIT) TOTAL VEHICLES Calculation factor: 100 sqm Estimated TRIP rate value per 350 SQM shown in shaded columns BOLD print indicates peak (busiest) period

Parameter summary

Trip rate parameter range selected: 290 - 580 (units: sqm) Survey date date range: 01/01/12 - 28/06/19 Number of weekdays (Monday-Friday): 2 Number of Saturdays: 0 Number of Sundays: 0 Surveys automatically removed from selection: 0 Surveys manually removed from selection: 0

APPENDIX F

Vehicle Tracking Analyses

Les Henry Associates Limited 100 January 2021

Skoda Octavia Skoda Octavia

Skoda Octavia

’ ﬁ ’ © ©

Skoda Octavia ’ ’ ﬁ Skoda Octavia

2011 Census Data

Les Henry Associates Limited 113 January 2021 LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - lower layer area name E01000669 : Bromley 020C accommodation type All categories: Accommodation type

LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - lower layer area name E01000669 : Bromley 020C accommodation type Whole house or bungalow

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 637 120 362 155 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 235 84 141 10 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 402 36 221 145

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 103 50 42 11 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 70 42 27 1 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 33 8 15 10

In order to protect against disclosure of personal information, records have been swapped between different geographic areas. Some counts will be affected, particularly small counts at the lowest geographies. LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 accommodation type All categories: Accommodation type

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 3,508 796 1,808 904 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 1,331 571 710 50 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 2,177 225 1,098 854

LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 accommodation type Whole house or bungalow

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 2,729 446 1,457 826 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 823 277 503 43 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 1,906 169 954 783

LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 accommodation type Flat, maisonette, apartment, caravan or other mobile or temporary structure

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 779 350 351 78 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 508 294 207 7 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 271 56 144 71

In order to protect against disclosure of personal information, records have been swapped between different geographic areas. Some counts will be affected, particularly small counts at the lowest geographies. LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston accommodation type All categories: Accommodation type

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 6,209 1,245 2,818 2,146 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 2,139 870 1,149 120 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 4,070 375 1,669 2,026

LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston accommodation type Whole house or bungalow

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 5,063 746 2,338 1,979 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 1,474 498 876 100 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 3,589 248 1,462 1,879

LC4415EW - Accommodation type by car or van availability by number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All households units Persons date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston accommodation type Flat, maisonette, apartment, caravan or other mobile or temporary structure

All categories: 2 or more cars No cars or vans 1 car or van in No of Usual Residents in Households Car or van or vans in in household household availability household All categories: Number of usual residents aged 17 or over in household 1,146 499 480 167 No usual residents aged 17 or over in household 0 0 0 0 One usual resident aged 17 or over in household 665 372 273 20 Two or more usual residents aged 17 or over in household 481 127 207 147

In order to protect against disclosure of personal information, records have been swapped between different geographic areas. Some counts will be affected, particularly small counts at the lowest geographies. LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - lower layer area name E01000669 : Bromley 020C tenure All categories: Tenure

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 740 251 220 139 130 1 bedroom 66 51 15 0 0 2 bedrooms 297 120 111 48 18 3 bedrooms 313 75 87 73 78 4 or more bedrooms 64 5 7 18 34

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - lower layer area name E01000669 : Bromley 020C tenure Owned: Owned outright

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 211 110 63 24 14 1 bedroom 8 6 2 0 0 2 bedrooms 87 60 17 7 3 3 bedrooms 103 41 41 13 8 4 or more bedrooms 13 3 3 4 3

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 361 77 109 77 98 1 bedroom 10 8 2 0 0 2 bedrooms 145 44 68 21 12 3 bedrooms 162 24 35 43 60 4 or more bedrooms 44 1 4 13 26

In order to protect against disclosure of personal information, records have been swapped between different geographic areas. Some counts will be affected, particularly small counts at the lowest geographies. LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - lower layer area name E01000669 : Bromley 020C tenure Rented: Social rented

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 45 30 10 2 3 1 bedroom 35 28 7 0 0 2 bedrooms 6 2 2 2 0 3 bedrooms 2 0 1 0 1 4 or more bedrooms 2 0 0 0 2

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 123 34 38 36 15 1 bedroom 13 9 4 0 0 2 bedrooms 59 14 24 18 3 3 bedrooms 46 10 10 17 9 4 or more bedrooms 5 1 0 1 3

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 tenure All categories: Tenure

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 3,508 1,157 994 653 704 1 bedroom 427 358 61 7 1 2 bedrooms 1,129 440 412 194 83 3 bedrooms 1,414 302 416 338 358 4 or more bedrooms 538 57 105 114 262

In order to protect against disclosure of personal information, records have been swapped between different geographic areas. Some counts will be affected, particularly small counts at the lowest geographies. LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 tenure Owned: Owned outright

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 1,010 428 364 118 100 1 bedroom 38 32 6 0 0 2 bedrooms 316 191 93 21 11 3 bedrooms 485 169 203 72 41 4 or more bedrooms 171 36 62 25 48

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 tenure Owned: Owned with a mortgage or loan or shared ownership

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 1,604 317 415 380 492 1 bedroom 72 54 15 2 1 2 bedrooms 509 169 195 100 45 3 bedrooms 724 83 172 205 264 4 or more bedrooms 299 11 33 73 182

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 tenure Rented: Social rented

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 287 202 43 22 20 1 bedroom 179 166 13 0 0 2 bedrooms 50 18 20 10 2 3 bedrooms 36 11 7 8 10 4 or more bedrooms 22 7 3 4 8

In order to protect against disclosure of personal information, records have been swapped between different geographic areas. Some counts will be affected, particularly small counts at the lowest geographies. LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 super output areas - middle layer area name E02000146 : Bromley 020 tenure Rented: Private rented or living rent free

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 607 210 172 133 92 1 bedroom 138 106 27 5 0 2 bedrooms 254 62 104 63 25 3 bedrooms 169 39 34 53 43 4 or more bedrooms 46 3 7 12 24

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston tenure All categories: Tenure

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 6,209 1,733 2,022 1,099 1,355 1 bedroom 384 294 77 10 3 2 bedrooms 1,544 581 581 258 124 3 bedrooms 3,008 717 1,001 591 699 4 or more bedrooms 1,273 141 363 240 529

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston tenure Owned: Owned outright

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 2,082 812 896 205 169 1 bedroom 42 32 10 0 0 2 bedrooms 426 253 140 26 7 3 bedrooms 1,119 434 502 112 71 4 or more bedrooms 495 93 244 67 91

In order to protect against disclosure of personal information, records have been swapped between different geographic areas. Some counts will be affected, particularly small counts at the lowest geographies. LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston tenure Owned: Owned with a mortgage or loan or shared ownership

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 2,507 413 681 562 851 1 bedroom 56 42 13 1 0 2 bedrooms 529 176 216 93 44 3 bedrooms 1,247 161 342 313 431 4 or more bedrooms 675 34 110 155 376

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston tenure Rented: Social rented

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 975 329 262 177 207 1 bedroom 201 165 31 4 1 2 bedrooms 330 80 128 75 47 3 bedrooms 404 77 99 92 136 4 or more bedrooms 40 7 4 6 23

LC4405EW - Tenure by household size by number of bedrooms ONS Crown Copyright Reserved [from Nomis on 8 January 2021] population All Households units Households date 2011 area type 2011 wards area name E05000108 : Bromley Common and Keston tenure Rented: Private rented or living rent free

4 or more All categories: 1 person in 2 people in 3 people in Bedrooms people in Household size household household household household All categories: Number of bedrooms 645 179 183 155 128 1 bedroom 85 55 23 5 2 2 bedrooms 259 72 97 64 26 3 bedrooms 238 45 58 74 61 4 or more bedrooms 63 7 5 12 39

Refuse and Recycling Information

Les Henry Associates Limited 122 January 2021 What can I recycle in my collections? Use the Squash Remember weekly service your cardboard to wash and to avoid smells boxes to save squash items in your non - space before recycling recyclable refuse

Paper & Card Food Plastic, Glass, Cans & Tins

3 Yes please 3 Yes please 3 Yes please

3 Envelopes 3 Wrapping 3 Tea bags & 3 Small cut 3 Tetra Paks 3 Shampoo with & without paper leaves fowers (e.g. juice & roll-on windows cartons) deodorant 3 Cardboard egg 3 Coffee grounds 3 Used kitchen bottles 3 Kitchen & toilet cartons paper 3 Jars & bottles roll tubes 3 Pet food 3 Fruit punnets 3 Paper bags 3 3 Foil & foil food 3 Used tissues 3 Jiffy bags with 3 Eggshells containers Metal & plastic 3 Paperback internal plastic 3 lids books Small amounts 3 Bleach and removed 3 Dairy products of sauces & disinfectant 3 Biscuit tubs 3 Junk mail 3 Cereal boxes & gravy bottles & tins 3 & leafets cardboard food Meat, fsh & packaging bones 3 Fat & gristle 3 Coffee cup lids 3 Ready meal 3 Receipts food trays 3 Paper from 3 Leftovers 3 Nuts & shells 3 Cleaning 3 Catalogues sandwich product bottles, 3 Aerosol cans packaging 3 Raw / uncooked 3 Bread, rice sprays & tubs 3 Greeting cards food & pasta 3 Plastic egg 3 Clean pizza 3 Cooking oil cartons 3 Shredded boxes 3 Fruit, bottles paper (bagged) vegetables 3 Yoghurt pots & peelings 3 Margarine tubs

7 No thank you 7 No thank you 7 No thank you

7 Tetra Paks 7 Wrapping paper 7 Nappies 7 Fruit & 7 Plastic flm or 7 Hazardous (e.g. juice with foil or glitter vegetable food wrapping chemical cartons) 7 Pet waste packaging containers 7 Plastic egg 7 Crisp packets 7 Milk cartons cartons 7 Plastic flm & 7 Grass cuttings 7 Cardboard egg food wrapping 7 Bubble wrap cartons 7 Sawdust 7 Plastic bags 7 Leaves 7 7 Pet litter 7 Cellophane Plastic bags 7 Cellophane 7 Hardback books 7 wrapping or Soil 7 Storage boxes wrapping 7 Cigarette ends cling flm 7 Plastic food 7 & ashtray Medicines 7 Printer 7 Polystyrene containers 7 Pet food contents cartridges 7 Sawdust pouches 7 7 Styrofoam Plastic 7 Cooking oil 7 Flower pots sandwich 7 Hedge 7 Ceramics 7 Cork packaging 7 Cotton wool trimmings 7 Polystyrene 7 pads CD & DVD cases 7 Greeting cards 7 Greasy & make-up 7 Hazardous 7 Pyrex dishes 7 China & with glitter cardboard like wipes chemicals pizza boxes or crockery 7 Black plastic 7 Wood shavings pastry wrappers 7 Twigs 7 Drinks glasses 7 Broken glass

www.bromley.gov.uk/wastenews What can I recycle in my collections? Place separately in to loosely tied plastic bags (not black sacks) next to your green or black containers on your collection day.

Batteries Clothes & Textiles Small Electrical Items

3 Yes please 3 Yes please 3 Yes please

3 Any household 3 Toy 3 Clothing 3 Door mat 3 Irons 3 Toothbrush battery batteries & charger 3 Towels & 3 Belts 3 Toasters 3 Lithium 3 Camera / fash tea towels 3 Chargers batteries batteries 3 Gloves 3 Electric toys 3 Rags & & games 3 Hot 3 Laptop 3 Remote control worn textiles 3 Socks brushes batteries batteries 3 Mobile 3 Mobile phone 3 Clock 3 Shoes 3 Pillow phones 3 Hair batteries batteries cases straighteners 3 Handbags 3 Laptop 3 Cell / button 3 Torch 3 Tights computer 3 Hedge batteries batteries 3 Duvet trimmers covers 3 Net curtains 3 MP3 players 3 Cordless tool 3 Smoke detector 3 Extension batteries batteries 3 Sheets 3 Tablets socket leads 3 3 Toothbrush Rechargeable 3 Fabric 3 Hair 3 Smoke batteries household window blinds dryers detectors batteries 3 Radio 3 3 batteries 3 Watch Table cloth Electric batteries razors 3 Razor batteries

7 No thank you 7 No thank you 7 No thank you

7 Car 7 Toys 7 Duvets, pillows 7 Rugs 7 Fridges 7 Manual batteries & other stuffed toothbrushes 7 Cameras & items 7 Furniture 7 Washing 7 Watches fash units machines 7 Batteries 7 Quilts 7 Vacuum 7 Tablet 7 Remote cleaners 7 Microwaves 7 Manual hair computer controls 7 Sleeping bags brushes 7 Sofa 7 Vacuum 7 Mobile 7 Clocks 7 Wellies cleaners 7 Hair rollers phones 7 Bed frame 7 Torches 7 Suitcases 7 Printers 7 Lawn 7 Scooter 7 Tents 7 7 mowers batteries Smoke Cushions 7 Laminators 7 detector Wooden 7 7 7 Garden Tools units Electric blinds 7 Desktop blankets strimmers 7 7 computer Toothbrushes Chargers 7 7 Heavy Televisions 7 7 Radios curtains Tumble dryers 7 Light bulbs 7 7 Razors 7 Place mats Manual razors