Lamotrigine + Valproate Linked to Birth Defects

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lamotrigine + Valproate Linked to Birth Defects May 15, 2006 • www.internalmedicinenews.com Women’s Health Clinical Rounds 47 D RUGS, PREGNANCY, A ND L ACTATION Lamotrigine + Valproate Valproic Acid Linked to Birth Defects or more than 20 years, the risk of with a significantly increased risk for neural tube defects (NTDs) asso- major malformations, especially NTDs; BY MICHELE G. SULLIVAN polytherapy with valproate was 11.8%— Fciated with first-trimester expo- and in the third, mothers who had a Mid-Atlantic Bureau significantly higher than the background sure to valproic acid has been well child with spina bifida were on a mean population rate of 2%-3%. known: The estimated risk is 2%, about dose of 1,640 mg/day vs. a mean of WASHINGTON — There is no evidence There was no significant relationship be- 10- to 20-fold higher than the baseline 941 mg/day among those whose chil- that lamotrigine monotherapy increases tween lamotrigine dosage and the inci- risk. With more widespread use of val- dren had no malformations. The same the risk of major congenital malformations dence of malformation, Dr. Messen- proic acid, partly due to increasing use studies indicated that at less than 600 in infants exposed prenatally to the drug, heimer said. The rate of malformations in of the drug for psychiatric conditions, mg/day, there was no increased risk. according to updated data from the Inter- women taking more than 400 mg/day more data and larger controlled studies These relatively new findings of ma- national Lamotrigine Pregnancy Registry. was slightly elevated at 4%. But only 100 on its teratogenic effects have accumu- jor malformations other than NTDs and However, when the drug was used as ad- women were taking such a high dose, lated over the past 3-4 years, revealing an the potentially increased risk of cognitive junctive therapy along with valproate, the and the confidence intervals were wide association with major malformations effects of valproic acid are important for rate of major congenital malformations Published reports have identified a sig- that previously had been women and physicians to was significantly higher than the rate for nificantly increased risk of major congen- reported anecdotally. The consider when women the background population, reported Dr. ital malformations among women taking main anomalies that have are planning a pregnancy. John A. Messenheimer of Glaxo- valproate as monotherapy (10.7%). These been identified are cardiac Sometimes, women who SmithKline, Research Triangle Park, N.C. studies prompted the American Epilepsy and limb malformations. have been on a drug for Since its inception in 1992, the lamot- Society’s pregnancy outcomes forum pan- The results of these epilepsy for many years rigine registry has recorded 2,000 preg- el to recommend last year that valproate studies reflect what we may no longer need it. If nancies exposed to the drug in the first be avoided as a first-line therapy for any in- found in a metaanalysis a switch to another drug is trimester. The interim report on data up dication in women of childbearing age. of data from 13 cohort not possible, patients need to September 2005 was presented as a The lamotrigine registry could not de- studies in the medical lit- to be monitored closely poster at the joint annual meeting of the termine whether valproate exposure alone erature, published be- for malformations, as has American Epilepsy Society and the Amer- could explain the higher rate of defects in tween 1982 and 2005. The been the practice for ican Clinical Neurophysiology Society. the lamotrigine/valproate group. The studies in the metaanaly- BY GIDEON NTDs, although there is Most of the women (707) were taking numbers of antiepileptic drugs used may be sis, published in April in a KOREN, M.D. no way to monitor for po- lamotrigine as monotherapy, 256 were on inextricably tied to the frequency and sever- Canadian journal, com- tential cognitive effects. polytherapy with lamotrigine but without ity of seizures, making it difficult to assess pared rates of major malformations Another approach for women who valproate, and 119 were on polytherapy the contribution of each factor, he said. among women who reported taking are dependent on valproic acid is to with lamotrigine and valproate. In adults, lamotrigine is approved as ad- valproic acid during the first trimester make every effort to keep the daily dose Of the 20 major congenital malforma- junctive therapy for the generalized with rates among pregnant women at 600 mg or below or, if that is not fea- tions reported, two were club feet, two seizures of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome and who were taking other antiepileptic sible, under 1,000 mg/day. Patients were cases of anencephaly, and three were for conversion to monotherapy in adults drugs (AEDs) and among women who should be monitored with ultrasound, ventricular septal defects. The remaining with partial seizures who are receiving were not taking any such drugs. fetal echocardiography, and maternal malformations included midline defects, treatment. It is also approved for mainte- Nearly 1,000 pregnant women were and amniotic α-fetoprotein testing. urogenital defects, cortical dysplasia, hy- nance treatment of bipolar disorder, and exposed to valproic acid in the 13 stud- Evidence that reducing the dose can poplastic left heart syndrome, hypoplasia it is a pregnancy category C drug. ies. The risk of major malformations, effectively reduce malformations came of the left ventricle, and diaphragmatic her- Physicians are asked to report exposed including NTDs, associated with expo- in a report last year from the Australian nia with abdominal organ displacement. pregnancies to the international registry sure to valproic acid was twofold pregnancy registry for women on The malformation rate in women on by calling 800-336-2176 as soon as the greater than the risk with exposure to AEDs, which found the risk of fetal mal- lamotrigine monotherapy was 2.8%; the pregnancy is identified. The complete in- other AEDs. The risk was 4.4-fold formations was 13 times higher among rate in those on polytherapy without val- terim report of the registry is available by greater than in the healthy controls, women taking more than 1,100 mg of proate was 2.7%. The rate in women on calling the same number. ■ representing a highly significant in- valproic acid per day as monotherapy, crease in risk among valproic acid–ex- compared with women not taking an posed pregnancies. antiepileptic drug. Although the fetal We could not include three studies malformation rate among those on low- Two Deaths After Mifepristone Medical comparing the neurobehavioral risks er doses was greater than the 2%-3% of in utero exposure to valproic acid risk in the general population, the dif- Abortion Prompt FDA to Issue Advisory and other AEDs in the metaanalysis, be- ference was not significant. cause of their different designs and the If possible, a different medication for wo additional deaths after medical Ǡ Weakness with or without abdominal variety of cognitive tests used. Still, all controlling seizures should be consid- Tabortion with mifepristone (Mifeprex) pain. three reported an association between ered. Carbamazepine (Tegretol) is con- have prompted the Food and Drug Ad- Ǡ No fever or other signs of infection valproic acid and developmental delays sidered by many neurologists and ob- ministration to issue a public health advi- more than 24 hours after taking miso- and cognitive deficits. The most promi- stetricians to be the AED of choice in sory alerting health care providers and ad- prostol. nent effect was on verbal IQ. More pregnancy, because the cumulative data vising review of prescribing information. Strong consideration should be given to studies on the neurodevelopmental ef- to date do not reveal any risks of ma- The drug’s manufacturer, Danco Labo- obtaining a complete blood count to iden- fects of in utero exposure that control jor malformations, except for spina bi- ratories, notified the agency of the deaths, tify those patients with hidden infection. for maternal education and other con- fida at about 1%, which is half the rate which took place in the United States. The FDA recommends that if physi- founding factors need to be conducted associated with valproic acid. One of the deaths has since been de- cians suspect infection in patients with this to further examine these associations. However, there are far fewer data on termined to not be related to either an presentation, they should consider imme- On the positive side, in 3 of the 13 the reproductive risks of newer anti- abortion or to the use of mifepristone and diately initiating treatment with antibi- studies that also looked at the dose-de- epileptics such as lamotrigine and misoprostol. The FDA is investigating the otics that include coverage of anaerobic pendent effects of valproic acid, the gabapentin. Of the newer drugs, lam- other death, which involved symptoms of bacteria, such as Clostridium sordellii. How- threshold dose to cause malformations otrigine seems to be the most promis- infection. ever, the agency does not recommend the was about 1,000 mg/day, which has ing in terms of adverse fetal outcomes, The agency advises physicians to discuss use of prophylactic antibiotics at this time. been reported over the past few years. but the number of pregnancies with with their patients the risk of sepsis as well Four previous deaths from sepsis have This is true for all malformations asso- data is much smaller than is available as early signs and symptoms that may been confirmed in U.S. women following ciated with valproic acid, including with valproic acid and carbamazepine. warrant immediate medical evaluation. medical abortion with mifepristone and NTDs. In one study, first-trimester val- In addition, the FDA advises physicians misoprostol from September 2003 to June proic acid plasma levels in women were DR.
Recommended publications
  • Integrating Complementary Medicine Into Cardiovascular Medicine
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Elsevier - Publisher Connector Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 46, No. 1, 2005 © 2005 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN 0735-1097/05/$30.00 Published by Elsevier Inc. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.031 ACCF COMPLEMENTARY MEDICINE EXPERT CONSENSUS DOCUMENT Integrating Complementary Medicine Into Cardiovascular Medicine A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (Writing Committee to Develop an Expert Consensus Document on Complementary and Integrative Medicine) WRITING COMMITTEE MEMBERS JOHN H. K. VOGEL, MD, MACC, Chair STEVEN F. BOLLING, MD, FACC BRIAN OLSHANSKY, MD, FACC REBECCA B. COSTELLO, PHD KENNETH R. PELLETIER, MD(HC), PHD ERMINIA M. GUARNERI, MD, FACC CYNTHIA M. TRACY, MD, FACC MITCHELL W. KRUCOFF, MD, FACC, FCCP ROBERT A. VOGEL, MD, FACC JOHN C. LONGHURST, MD, PHD, FACC TASK FORCE MEMBERS ROBERT A. VOGEL, MD, FACC, Chair JONATHAN ABRAMS, MD, FACC SANJIV KAUL, MBBS, FACC JEFFREY L. ANDERSON, MD, FACC ROBERT C. LICHTENBERG, MD, FACC ERIC R. BATES, MD, FACC JONATHAN R. LINDNER, MD, FACC BRUCE R. BRODIE, MD, FACC* ROBERT A. O’ROURKE, MD, FACC† CINDY L. GRINES, MD, FACC GERALD M. POHOST, MD, FACC PETER G. DANIAS, MD, PHD, FACC* RICHARD S. SCHOFIELD, MD, FACC GABRIEL GREGORATOS, MD, FACC* SAMUEL J. SHUBROOKS, MD, FACC MARK A. HLATKY, MD, FACC CYNTHIA M. TRACY, MD, FACC* JUDITH S. HOCHMAN, MD, FACC* WILLIAM L. WINTERS, JR, MD, MACC* *Former members of Task Force; †Former chair of Task Force The recommendations set forth in this report are those of the Writing Committee and do not necessarily reflect the official position of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Drugs List
    ^ ^ ^ ^ ^[ ^ The National Drugs List Of Syrian Arab Republic Sexth Edition 2006 ! " # "$ % &'() " # * +$, -. / & 0 /+12 3 4" 5 "$ . "$ 67"5,) 0 " /! !2 4? @ % 88 9 3: " # "$ ;+<=2 – G# H H2 I) – 6( – 65 : A B C "5 : , D )* . J!* HK"3 H"$ T ) 4 B K<) +$ LMA N O 3 4P<B &Q / RS ) H< C4VH /430 / 1988 V W* < C A GQ ") 4V / 1000 / C4VH /820 / 2001 V XX K<# C ,V /500 / 1992 V "!X V /946 / 2004 V Z < C V /914 / 2003 V ) < ] +$, [2 / ,) @# @ S%Q2 J"= [ &<\ @ +$ LMA 1 O \ . S X '( ^ & M_ `AB @ &' 3 4" + @ V= 4 )\ " : N " # "$ 6 ) G" 3Q + a C G /<"B d3: C K7 e , fM 4 Q b"$ " < $\ c"7: 5) G . HHH3Q J # Hg ' V"h 6< G* H5 !" # $%" & $' ,* ( )* + 2 ا اوا ادو +% 5 j 2 i1 6 B J' 6<X " 6"[ i2 "$ "< * i3 10 6 i4 11 6! ^ i5 13 6<X "!# * i6 15 7 G!, 6 - k 24"$d dl ?K V *4V h 63[46 ' i8 19 Adl 20 "( 2 i9 20 G Q) 6 i10 20 a 6 m[, 6 i11 21 ?K V $n i12 21 "% * i13 23 b+ 6 i14 23 oe C * i15 24 !, 2 6\ i16 25 C V pq * i17 26 ( S 6) 1, ++ &"r i19 3 +% 27 G 6 ""% i19 28 ^ Ks 2 i20 31 % Ks 2 i21 32 s * i22 35 " " * i23 37 "$ * i24 38 6" i25 39 V t h Gu* v!* 2 i26 39 ( 2 i27 40 B w< Ks 2 i28 40 d C &"r i29 42 "' 6 i30 42 " * i31 42 ":< * i32 5 ./ 0" -33 4 : ANAESTHETICS $ 1 2 -1 :GENERAL ANAESTHETICS AND OXYGEN 4 $1 2 2- ATRACURIUM BESYLATE DROPERIDOL ETHER FENTANYL HALOTHANE ISOFLURANE KETAMINE HCL NITROUS OXIDE OXYGEN PROPOFOL REMIFENTANIL SEVOFLURANE SUFENTANIL THIOPENTAL :LOCAL ANAESTHETICS !67$1 2 -5 AMYLEINE HCL=AMYLOCAINE ARTICAINE BENZOCAINE BUPIVACAINE CINCHOCAINE LIDOCAINE MEPIVACAINE OXETHAZAINE PRAMOXINE PRILOCAINE PREOPERATIVE MEDICATION & SEDATION FOR 9*: ;< " 2 -8 : : SHORT -TERM PROCEDURES ATROPINE DIAZEPAM INJ.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigation of Influence of Diazepam, Valproate, Cyproheptadine and Cortisol on the Rewarding Ventral Tegmental Self-Stimulation Behaviour
    Ind. J. Physio!. Pharmac., Volume 33, Number 3, 1989 INVESTIGATION OF INFLUENCE OF DIAZEPAM, VALPROATE, CYPROHEPTADINE AND CORTISOL ON THE REWARDING VENTRAL TEGMENTAL SELF-STIMULATION BEHAVIOUR SONTI V. RAMANA AND T. DESIRAJU· Department ofNeurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health arzd Neuro Sciences, Bangalore - 560 029 ( Received on June IS, 1989 ) Abstract: Experiments were carried on in the Wistar rats having self-stimulation (88) electrodes implanted chronically in substantia nigra-ventral tegmental area (SN-VTA) to examine whether modulations of GABAergic, serotonergic, histaminergic, dopaminergic, and glucocorticoid neuronal receptor functions will affect or not the brain reward system and the 88 behaviour. The modulalon are the wellknown drugs: diazepam which is a facilitator ohome of the GABA recepton, and used clinically (or its tranquilising, anxiolytic, sedative-hypnotic and anti-convulsant properties: sodium valproate which is known to enhance the GABA synapse function, and used clinically for its anti­ convulsant property; haloperidol which is a dopaminergic receptor (D2) blocker, and clinically used for its anti-psychotic property; cyproheptadine which is both anti-histaminic and anti-serotonergic (blocka 5-HT2 receptor), used clinically for its antihistaminic and other beneficial properties; and hydrocortisone which is the stress-resisting glucocorticoid having direct effects on both brain and body cells, used clinically for the wide-ranging glucocorticoid therapeutic effects. The results revealed that systemic administration of these drugs, except haloperidol, caused no significant influenee on the 88 behaviour, thereby indicating that these nondopaminergic drugs have no effect on brain-reward system and also these categories of synaptic actions are not likely to be involved in the primary organization of the mechanisms of the brain-reward system.
    [Show full text]
  • 1493 JP XV Infrared Reference Spectra
    JP XV Infrared Reference Spectra 1493 Roxatidine Acetate Hydrochloride Preparation of sample: Potassium chloride disk method Roxithromycin Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Saccharin Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method 1494 Infrared Reference Spectra JP XV Saccharin Sodium Hydrate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Salbutamol Sulfate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Santonin Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method JP XV Infrared Reference Spectra 1495 Scopolamine Butylbromide Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Siccanin Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Sodium Fusidate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method 1496 Infrared Reference Spectra JP XV Sodium Picosulfate Hydrate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Sodium Polystyrene Sulfonate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Sodium Prasterone Sulfate Hydrate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method JP XV Infrared Reference Spectra 1497 Sodium Salicylate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Sodium Valproate Preparation of sample: Liquid film method Spiramycin Acetate Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method 1498 Infrared Reference Spectra JP XV Spironolactone Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Sulbactam Sodium Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method Sulbenicillin Sodium Preparation of sample: Potassium bromide disk method JP XV Infrared Reference Spectra
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Picrotoxin and Cyproheptadine Pretreatment On
    Int J Biol Med Res. 2012; 3(2): 1606-1608 Int J Biol Med Res www.biomedscidirect.com Volume 2, Issue 4, Jan 2012 Contents lists available at BioMedSciDirect Publications International Journal of Biological & Medical Research BioMedSciDirect Journal homepage: www.biomedscidirect.com International Journal of Publications BIOLOGICAL AND MEDICAL RESEARCH Original article Effect of picrotoxin and cyproheptadine pretreatment on sodium valproate induced wet dog shake behavior in rats B M Sattigeri*, J J Balsara, J H Jadhav Department of pharmacology, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth’s SBKS & MIRC, Piparia, Vadodra Gujaart Department of pharmacology, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences, Malkapur, Karad (Dist.Satara) 415110, Maharashtra, India A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Keywords: Sodium valproate, a broad spectrum antiepileptic elevates the brain GABA levels by various Cyproheptadine mechanisms. Histological, electrophysiological and the biochemical studies suggest a Picrotoxin Sodium valproate regulatory role of GABA on dopaminergic neurons. Behavioral studies in animals provide an Wet Dog Shake Behavior additional evidence for interaction between GABAergic and DAergic systems. Valproate at 200- 500mg/kg induces Wet Dog Shake (WDS) behavior in rats. The WDS behavior in rats and head twitch responses in mice is evoked by 5- hydroxy-tryptophan (5-HT), the 5-HT precursor, the directly acting non-selective 5-HT receptor agonists and 5-HT releasers. In order to determine the involvement of GABAergic and 5-HTergic mechanism in the induction of WDS behavior by valproate in rats, the study was taken upto investigate the effect picrotoxin and cyproheptadine pretreatment on valproate induced WDS in rats.
    [Show full text]
  • Contraception and Misconceptions
    CONTRACEPTION AND MISCONCEPTIONS CONTRACEPTION IN WOMEN WITH MENTAL ILLNESS OVERVIEW Hormones and mood How mental illness impacts on contraceptive choice Ideal contraception Pro and cons of contraceptive methods in women with mental illness Hormonal contraception and mood ESTROGENS anti-inflammatory neuroprotective effects of estradiol modulation of the limbic processing memory of emotionally-relevant information. estradiol “beneficially” modulates pathways implicated in the pathophysiology of depression, including serotonin and norepinephrine pathways PROGESTROGENS Previously thought to be anxiogenic, depressogenic Breakdown products Depression – alpha hydroxy progestrogen breakdown products pro – inflammatory, anxiogenic HORMONES AND MOODS – COMPLEX INTERPLAY MENTAL ILLNESS AND CONTRACEPTIVE CHOICE Effect of mental illness on contraceptive choice Effect of contraceptive choice on mental illness Drug interactions EFFECT MENTAL ILLNESS ON CONTRACEPTIVE CHOICE Impulsive Poor planning Cognitive and problem judgement Poor adherence IMPULSIVITY COGNITION POOR JUDGEMENT LETS NOT FORGET SUBSTANCES…… TYPES OF CONTRACEPTION No method Non hormonal Condom/Femidom Diaphragm Non hormone containing IUCD (Copper T) Hormonal COC POP Mirena Evra Patch Nuva Ring Implant ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES POP – avoid Same time every day COC Pros Effective Reduction PMS – monophasic estrogen dominant pill eg Femodene, Yaz, Nordette Cons Drug interactions Pill burden Daily dose EVRA PATCH Weekly patch Transdermal system: 150 mcg/day
    [Show full text]
  • 209627Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 209627Orig1s000 MULTI-DISCIPLINE REVIEW Summary Review Office Director Cross Discipline Team Leader Review Clinical Review Non-Clinical Review Statistical Review Clinical Pharmacology Review Reviewers of Multi-Disciplinary Review and Evaluation SECTIONS OFFICE/ AUTHORED/ ACKNOWLEDGED/ DISCIPLINE REVIEWER DIVISION APPROVED Mark Seggel, Ph.D. OPQ/ONDP/DNDP2 Authored: Section 4.2 Digitally signed by Mark R. Seggel -S CMC Lead DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=HHS, ou=FDA, ou=People, cn=Mark R. Signature: Mark R. Seggel -S Seggel -S, 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=1300071539 Date: 2018.08.08 16:29:15 -04'00' Frederic Moulin, DVM, PhD OND/ODE3/DBRUP Authored: Section 5 Pharmacology/ Digitally signed by Frederic Moulin -S Toxicology DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=HHS, ou=FDA, ou=People, Reviewer Signature: Frederic Moulin -S 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=2001708658, cn=Frederic Moulin -S Date: 2018.08.08 15:26:57 -04'00' Kimberly Hatfield, PhD OND/ODE3/DBRUP Approved: Section 5 Pharmacology/ Toxicology Digitally signed by Kimberly P. Hatfield -S DN: c=US, o=U.S. Government, ou=HHS, ou=FDA, ou=People, Team Leader Signature: Kimberly P. Hatfield -S 0.9.2342.19200300.100.1.1=1300387215, cn=Kimberly P. Hatfield -S Date: 2018.08.08 14:56:10 -04'00' Li Li, Ph.D. OCP/DCP3 Authored: Sections 6 and 17.3 Clinical Pharmacology Dig ta ly signed by Li Li S DN c=US o=U S Government ou=HHS ou=FDA ou=People Reviewer cn=Li Li S Signature: Li Li -S 0 9 2342 19200300 100 1 1=20005 08577 Date 2018 08 08 15 39 23 04'00' Doanh Tran, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Valproate-Olanzapine-Nifedipine Interaction Related Pedal Edema
    Letter-to-the Editor Taiwanese Journal of Psychiatry (Taipei) Vol. 28 No. 3 2014 • 181 • Valproate-olanzapine-nifedipine Interaction Related Pedal Edema Patient’s bilateral pedal pitting edema did not Case Report resolve spontaneously after discontinuing olan- zapine until he received diuretics with furosemide A 45-year-old single male patient with bipo- 40 mg/day and spironolactone 75 mg/day on the lar I disorder was admitted to acute ward of our 21st day of pitting edema. He required further hospital due to depressive mood with irritability treatment, and had normal fi ndings in physical ex- for more than one month. The fi nding of physical amination and repeated laboratory tests. examination at admission revealed no bilateral pedal edema under long-term usage of valproate Comment 700 mg/day as mood stabilizer, nifedipine 30 mg/ day for essential hypertension, and allopurinol There have been some clinical reports to as- 100 mg/day for gouty arthritis before hospitaliza- sociate olanzapine treatment with bilateral lower tion. The results of laboratory tests for electro- extremity edema since 2000 [1]. Pre-clinical trials lytes, renal function, liver function, chest X-ray, of oral olanzapine (doses being equal or greater and electrocardiography were also within normal than 2.5 mg/day) have also reported peripheral limits. edema as a rare adverse event. The pathophysio- During this hospitalization, we added olan- logical mechanism of low extremity edema re- zapine 5 mg/day to control manic symptoms. Five mains unknown, although some mechanisms days later, he reported bilateral swelling over low- could be proposed, such as olanzapine’s blockage er legs and ankles, a bilateral 2+ pitting edema in of α1, M1, M3 and 5-HT2 receptors [2, 3].
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016
    Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report Recommendations and Reports / Vol. 65 / No. 3 July 29, 2016 U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2016 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Recommendations and Reports CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................1 Methods ....................................................................................................................2 How to Use This Document ...............................................................................3 Keeping Guidance Up to Date ..........................................................................5 References ................................................................................................................8 Abbreviations and Acronyms ............................................................................9 Appendix A: Summary of Changes from U.S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010 ...........................................................................10 Appendix B: Classifications for Intrauterine Devices ............................. 18 Appendix C: Classifications for Progestin-Only Contraceptives ........ 35 Appendix D: Classifications for Combined Hormonal Contraceptives .... 55 Appendix E: Classifications for Barrier Methods ..................................... 81 Appendix F: Classifications for Fertility Awareness–Based Methods ..... 88 Appendix G: Lactational
    [Show full text]
  • (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0268722 A1 Siegelin Et Al
    US 20110268722A1 (19) United States (12) Patent Application Publication (10) Pub. No.: US 2011/0268722 A1 Siegelin et al. (43) Pub. Date: Nov. 3, 2011 (54) COMBINATION THERAPIES WITH Publication Classification MTOCHONORAL-TARGETED (51) Int. Cl ANT-TUMIORAGENTS A638/17 (2006.01) CI2N 5/071 (2010.01) (76) Inventors: Markus D. Siegelin, Weehawken, A6IP35/00 (2006.01) NJ (US); Dario C. Altieri, A 6LX 39/395 (2006.01) Worcester, MA (US) C07D 225/06 (2006.01) (52) U.S. Cl. ..................... 424/130.1; 514/18.9; 540/461; (21) Appl. No.: 13/092,475 435/375 (57) ABSTRACT (22) Filed: Apr. 22, 2011 Described are mitochondria-targeted anti-tumor agents, death receptor agonists, autophagy inhibitors, and NF-KB Related U.S. Application Data signaling pathway inhibitors, and methods of making and (60) Provisional application No. 61/326,872, filed on Apr. using the same for the treatment of disorders associated with 22, 2010. unwanted cell proliferation. Patent Application Publication Nov. 3, 2011 Sheet 1 of 13 US 2011/0268722 A1 120% 8: 8: 8 CE 60% : 5 P_GA s : RA 2:: : P-GA-RA : : 8 N3 FAS Figure 1A Patent Application Publication Nov. 3, 2011 Sheet 2 of 13 US 2011/0268722 A1 igure 1B ---, igure 2A Figure 2B Patent Application Publication Nov. 3, 2011 Sheet 3 of 13 US 2011/0268722 A1 8. s::::::: se: -83.383.3 ---sixxxxx:----- --~~~x-x-x-xxii. : s: 8 i88 s: sig ::::::: ...i Figure 2C Figure 2D Figure 3A Figure 3B Patent Application Publication Nov. 3, 2011 Sheet 4 of 13 US 2011/0268722 A1 ::: :*:: & : : isix; {S3.g3-8 : Exx8:8-3 : {kari 333333.
    [Show full text]
  • Jp Xvii the Japanese Pharmacopoeia
    JP XVII THE JAPANESE PHARMACOPOEIA SEVENTEENTH EDITION Official from April 1, 2016 English Version THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH, LABOUR AND WELFARE Notice: This English Version of the Japanese Pharmacopoeia is published for the convenience of users unfamiliar with the Japanese language. When and if any discrepancy arises between the Japanese original and its English translation, the former is authentic. The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 64 Pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 41 of the Law on Securing Quality, Efficacy and Safety of Products including Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices (Law No. 145, 1960), the Japanese Pharmacopoeia (Ministerial Notification No. 65, 2011), which has been established as follows*, shall be applied on April 1, 2016. However, in the case of drugs which are listed in the Pharmacopoeia (hereinafter referred to as ``previ- ous Pharmacopoeia'') [limited to those listed in the Japanese Pharmacopoeia whose standards are changed in accordance with this notification (hereinafter referred to as ``new Pharmacopoeia'')] and have been approved as of April 1, 2016 as prescribed under Paragraph 1, Article 14 of the same law [including drugs the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare specifies (the Ministry of Health and Welfare Ministerial Notification No. 104, 1994) as of March 31, 2016 as those exempted from marketing approval pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 14 of the Same Law (hereinafter referred to as ``drugs exempted from approval'')], the Name and Standards established in the previous Pharmacopoeia (limited to part of the Name and Standards for the drugs concerned) may be accepted to conform to the Name and Standards established in the new Pharmacopoeia before and on September 30, 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Formulary List of Covered Prescription Drugs
    2021 Formulary List of covered prescription drugs This drug list applies to all Individual HMO products and the following Small Group HMO products: Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO, Sharp Platinum 90 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO, Sharp Gold 80 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 73 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 73 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 87 Premier HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 94 Premier HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO, Sharp Bronze 60 Premier HDHP HMO AI-AN, Sharp Minimum Coverage Performance HMO, Sharp $0 Cost Share Performance HMO AI-AN, Sharp $0 Cost Share Premier HMO AI-AN, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Performance HMO, Sharp Silver 70 Off Exchange Premier HMO, Sharp Performance Platinum 90 HMO 0/15 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Platinum 90 HMO 0/20 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Gold 80 HMO 350 /25 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Gold 80 HMO 250/35 + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Silver 70 HMO 2250/50 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HMO 2250/55 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Silver 70 HDHP HMO 2500/20% + Child Dental, Sharp Performance Bronze 60 HMO 6300/65 + Child Dental, Sharp Premier Bronze 60 HDHP HMO
    [Show full text]