Suicides on Commuter Rail in California
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
May 7, 2019 Media Contact: Dan Lieberman, 650-508-6385 Samtrans and Caltrain Encourage Cycling on Bike to Work Day This Thursday
NEWS May 7, 2019 Media Contact: Dan Lieberman, 650-508-6385 SamTrans and Caltrain Encourage Cycling on Bike to Work Day This Thursday, May 9, Bay Area bicyclists will participate by the thousands in the 25th Annual Bike to Work Day, an annual event that encourages commuters to choose bicycles over cars for their daily commute. SamTrans buses can carry two bikes on racks at the front of each bus, and two additional bikes are allowed inside the bus, depending on passenger loads. Some things to know: only single-rider, two-wheel bicycles are permitted. There is no age limit for riders using the bike racks or bringing bikes on board the bus. However, riders must be able to load and unload their bikes without help from the operator. On Caltrain, every train is equipped with at least two bike cars. Due to the popularity of the onboard bike program, capacity for bicyclists can be a challenge. Cyclists are encouraged to choose local trains with lighter ridership to ensure they are able to board if they want to test out biking to work for the first time. Some express and limited stop trains are already operating at or near capacity for onboard bikes. Each weekday approximately 6,000 bicyclists take a bike on the train, more than any other rail service in the country. While biking and taking public transit can work well together for first- and last-mile connections, as well as getting people out of their cars and off freeways, onboard capacity may be at its limit on Bike to Work Day. -
Impact of a Single Bullet
Palo Vol. XXIX, Number 65 • Wednesday, May 21, 2008 ■ 50¢ Alto Palo Altans divided on gay marriage Page 3 www.PaloAltoOnline.comwww.Pw ww.P a lo Alt o O nlinn lin e . c o m Impact of a single bullet Family, community feel the loss of local restaurateur Page 19 Photo illustration by Veronica Weber & Shannon Corey Talk about the news at Town Square, www.PaloAltoOnline.com ■ Upfront Council speaks out on Theatre probe Page 3 ■ At School Local teen wins international music competition Page 17 ■ Sports Final swim splash for Paly seniors Page 23 SCHOOL OF MEDICINE HEALTHCARE TOMORROW • SPEAKER SERIES • When Every Minute Counts: The Future of Emergency Medicine Stanford University Medical Center invites you to join us for a public forum on the state of Emergency Medicine nationwide and how emergency preparedness and rapid response affect our community. Learn about the latest trends in Emergency Medicine, what it means to be a Level-1 trauma center, and how the plans underway to rebuild and modernize our hospitals will help us continue to be here when you need us most. The forum will feature leading physicians from Stanford Hospital & Clinics who specialize in Emergency Medicine. Thursday, May 22, 2008 FEATURED SPEAKERS 6:00 – 7:30 pm Paul S. Auerbach, MD, MS, Palo Alto Art Center FACEP, FAWM 1313 Newell Road Clinical Professor of Surgery, Palo Alto Division of Emergency Medicine, Stanford Hospital & Clinics Light refreshments will be served. For more information, please visit our website at: Robert L. Norris, MD, FACEP Division Chief, Emergency Medicine; WWW.STANFORDPACKARD.ORG Associate Professor, Stanford Hospital & Clinics HEALTHCARE TOMORROW is a speaker series presented by the Stanford University Medical Center Renewal Project discussing topics ranging MODERATOR from Sustainability and Modern Hospital Design to the Future of Emergency Medicine. -
Caltrain TIRCP Application Jan
PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY APPLICATION FOR 2018 TRANSIT AND INTERCITY RAIL CAPITAL PROGRAM FUNDS PROJECT NARRATIVE A. Project Title Page Project Title: Peninsula Corridor Electrification Expansion Project The Peninsula Corridor Electrification Expansion Project (EEP) includes a series of incremental investments in the 51-mile Caltrain Corridor between the 4th and King Station (San Francisco) and the Tamien Station (San Jose). These investments are focused on expanding and fully converting Caltrain’s mainline diesel fleet to electric trains. This investment builds on and leverages the existing Peninsula Corridor Electrification Project (PCEP) and supports the goals of the Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program (TIRCP), providing increased capacity and service flexibility, supporting state and interregional connectivity, and reducing greenhouse gas emissions through elimination of diesel service from the mainline Peninsula Corridor. In addition to providing immediate, direct benefits, the EEP also represents an incremental step within a larger program of development that will evolve the Peninsula Corridor in a way that supports the ridership, service levels, and connectivity goals contemplated in the draft 2018 State Rail Plan. The central component of Caltrain’s 2018 TIRCP application is the purchase of 96 additional Electric Multiple Units (EMU). This procurement will fully exercise all available options under Caltrain’s current contract with Stadler and will provide sufficient EMUs to fully electrify Caltrain’s mainline fleet, while also sustaining and expanding capacity to accommodate growing demand. In addition to requesting funds for the purchase of EMUs, Caltrain is also requesting a smaller amount funding for a series of associated projects that will equip the corridor to receive and operate a fully electrified fleet in a way that allows the railroad to reap the maximum benefit from its investments. -
Application for Admission
OFFICE USE ONLY NAME San Jose/Evergreen Community College District APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION Colleague ID # LAST Term & College for which you are applying: FALL SPRING SUMMER 20 Date Check ONE college only Evergreen Valley College San José City College Initials If you plan on taking classes at BOTH colleges within this District, make sure you have a current application AT EACH COLLEGE 1 Legal Name Last Name First Name Middle Initial 2 Address Number & Street Apt. Number FIRST City State Zip Code 3 Telephone Number Home Other 4 Origin Walk-In Mail 5 Social Security Number 6 Birth Date (Necessary for Financial Aid applicants) MM DD YY Returning Student’s / ID # 7 Ethnic Background AL Asian/Laotian HCA Hispanic/Central America PACG Pac Islander/Guam A Asian AM Asian/Cambodian HM His/Mex Hisp/Amer PACH Pac Islander/Hawaiian AA African/American AV Asian/Vietnamese HSA Hispanic/South America PACS Pac Islander/Samoa AC Asian/Chinese AX Asian/Other HX Hispanic/Other PACX Pac Islander/Other AI Asian/Indian C Caucasian/Non-Hispanic NA Native American UNK Unknown AJ Asian/Japanese FI Filipino OTH Other Non-White XD Declined to State M.I. AK Asian/Korean H Hispanic P Pacific Islander 8 Gender Male Female 9 E-Mail Address 10 Type of Applicant 11 Major/Academic Program CODE Check if you are: If undecided, temporarily choose GENMJ.AS.1 (SJCC ONLY). Student Applicant (SAP) See CODE SHEET - Application CANNOT be processed without an academic program. Employee Applicant (EMA) 12 Admit Status (Fill in the one which best applies to you) N I am attending college for the first time after high school. -
2020 CAFBLA BAY SECTION WINNERS LIST Top 6 Advance to SLC Unless Noted
2020 CAFBLA BAY SECTION WINNERS LIST Top 6 Advance to SLC Unless Noted Place Entrant School Place Entrant School Accounting I Broadcast Journalism (Top 2) 1 Tang, Calix Homestead High School 1 Lee, Jennifer Homestead High School 2 Lu, Emma Homestead High School 1 Kim, Sydney Homestead High School 3 Kishinevsky, Lior Homestead High School 1 Wingrove, Shawheen Homestead High School 4 Tewari, Rishima Lynbrook High School 2 Jani, Aayushi Lynbrook High School 5 Thapa, Sakchhi Homestead High School 2 Narayanan, Bhagya Lynbrook High School 6 Li, Jessica Homestead High School 2 Tewari, Rishima Lynbrook High School 7 Srivatsan, Ananya Homestead High School 3 Sumang, Patricia Mae Westmoor High School 8 Lu, Alisa Lynbrook High School 3 Ulibas, Julianne Westmoor High School 9 Gao, Rebecca Lynbrook High School 4 Vemula, Ishitha Cupertino High School 10 Guo, Alan Henry M. Gunn High School 4 Narayanan, Shrinandan Cupertino High School Accounting II 4 Sreeram, Teesha Cupertino High School 1 Truong, Justin Homestead High School 5 Kosakuru, Emi Monta Vista High School 2 Zuo, Amy Lynbrook High School 5 Zou, Cindy Monta Vista High School 3 Chien, Elizabeth Homestead High School 5 Poosala, Pratya Monta Vista High School 4 Choy, Rachel Homestead High School 6 Wairagade, Rishita Dougherty Valley High School 5 Poon, Ashley Henry M. Gunn High School 6 Karamchandani, Mahek Dougherty Valley High School 6 Li, Jessica Homestead High School Business Calculations 7 Fung, Wilson Saratoga High School 1 Desouza, Hansel Homestead High School 8 Thapa, Sakchhi Homestead High School 2 Ting, Gilford Cupertino High School 9 Agarwal, Rishabh Irvington High School 3 Zhao, David Homestead High School 10 Tao, Miranda Henry M. -
TA Board Agenda
BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2020 EMILY BEACH, CHAIR RICO E. MEDINA, VICE CHAIR CAROLE GROOM DON HORSLEY JULIA MATES KARYL MATSUMOTO CARLOS ROMERO JIM HARTNETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AGENDA BOARD OF DIRECTORS MEETING SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY Due to COVID-19, this meeting will be conducted via teleconference only (no physical location) pursuant to the Governor’s Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20. Directors, staff and the public may participate remotely via Zoom at https://samtrans.zoom.us/j/97489736685?pwd=UkN4T0gwU0IwbHFjZkNCTm1Dd0VaZz09 or by entering Webinar ID: 974 8973 6685, Passcode: 019469 in the Zoom app for audio/visual capability or by calling 1-669-900-9128 (enter webinar ID and press # when prompted for participant ID) for audio only. The video live stream will be available during or after the meeting at http://www.smcta.com/about/boardofdirectors/video.html. Public Comments: Members of the public are encouraged to participate remotely. Public comments may be submitted to [email protected] prior to the meeting’s call to order so that they can be sent to the Board as soon as possible, while those received after an agenda item is heard will be included into the Board’s weekly correspondence and posted online at: http://www.smcta.com/about/boardofdirectors/boardofdirectorscalendar.html Oral public comments will also be accepted during the meeting through Zoom* or the teleconference number listed above. Public comments on individual agenda items are limited to one per person PER AGENDA ITEM. Use the Raise Hand feature to request to speak. For participants calling in, dial *67 if you do not want your telephone number to appear on the live broadcast. -
2021 Usapho Honorable Mentions
2021 USAPhO Honorable Mentions First Name Middle Name Last Name Current School School City School State Fiona Mary Carol Abney‐McPeek University of Chicago Laboratory High School Chicago IL Ishank Agrawal Disha Delphi Public School Kota, Rajasthan India Aditya Akula New Albany High School New Albany OH Albert An BASIS Independent Silicon Valley San Jose CA Akash K Anand Palos Verdes Peninsula High School Rancho Palos VerdesCA Adithya Shyam Balachandran High Technology High School Lincroft NJ William Bender Ladue High School Ladue MO Nishant Bhakar International Community School Kirkland WA Rohan Bhowmik The Harker School Cupertino CA Richard Bi Adlai E. Stevenson High School Lincolnshire IL Jacob Wade Buchsbaum American Heritage School Plantation Plantation FL Brian T Chang Archbishop Mitty High School San Jose CA Pranjal Chatterjee Lynbrook High School San Jose CA Christopher Chen BASIS Independent Fremont Fremont CA Derek Gordon Chen Belmont High School Belmont MA Eddie Chen West Windsor‐Plainsboro High School North Plainsboro NJ Justin Evan Chen Montgomery Blair High School Silver Spring MD Kyle Chen Rock Bridge High School Columbia MO Richard Chen Mission San Jose High School Fremont CA Kevin Ziyou Cheng Naperville Central High School Naperville IL Ricky P Cheng Amador Valley High School Pleasanton CA Reagan Choi Troy High School Troy MI Neil Chowdhury Phillips Exeter Academy Exeter NH David Dai The Harker School San Jose CA Samvit Das William Mason High School Mason OH Harsh Deep The Harker School San Jose CA Leo deJong Chapel Hill High School Chapel Hill NC Owen M Dugan Homeschool Sleepy Hollow NY Dylan Epstein‐Gross James S. -
Caltrain Rapid Rail Study Implementation Plan
Caltrain Rapid Rail Study Implementation Plan Summary In late 1997 the JPB began work on the Caltrain Rapid Rail Study. The study's purpose was to develop a strategic plan for Caltrain capital improvements between 2000 and 2010. The Rapid Rail Study evaluated the railroad's existing facilities and major expansion projects proposed over the years. The objective was to consider all the potential capital improvements in a single plan. Following this analysis, the Rapid Rail Study prioritized specific improvement programs using goals and objectives from Caltrain's Strategic Plan. The Draft Rapid Rail Study was released to the public on October 1, 1998. Between October 1998 and February 1999 the JPB received over 200 written comments and many oral comments at meetings held to discuss the study and at regular JPB meetings. These comments were used to revise the draft study's recommendations. The revised recommendations were adopted by the JPB at the __ 1999 meeting and are summarized in this document. This Implementation Plan will serve as the final study report. The draft study, Chapter 16 on the Caltrain Downtown San Francisco Extension Project status, and the response to comments document will serve as appendices to the report. 1. Implementation Process The purpose ofthe Caltrain Rapid Rail Study was to set forth a long-term strategic plan for Caltrain physical investments. The distinction between a strategic plan, such as the Rapid Rail Study, and a programming document, such as the annual capital improvement program, is critical to fully understand the implementation process. The Rapid Rail Study was designed to identify an overall direction for capital improvements based on Caltrain's Strategic Plan (which considered all aspects ofCaltrain service). -
Caltrain Bicycle Access & Parking Plan
Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board CCaallttrraaiinn BBiiccyyccllee AAcccceessss && PPaarrkkiinngg PPllaann October 2, 2008 Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board CCaallttrraaiinn BBiiccyyccllee AAcccceessss && PPaarrkkiinngg PPllaann October 2, 2008 Prepared by: Eisen|Letunic Transportation, Environmental and Urban Planning www.eisenletunic.com In association with: Fehr & Peers Transportation Consultants Table of Contents Chapters 4.5 Millbrae bicycle parking & boardings ................ 24 4.6 Millbrae issues & recommendations ................... 24 4.7 San Mateo bicycle parking & boardings ............. 25 Executive Summary ........................................................ iii 4.8 San Mateo issues & recommendations ............... 25 1. Introduction .................................................................. 1 4.9 Hillsdale bicycle parking & boardings ............... 26 2. Background .................................................................. 5 4.10 Hillsdale issues & recommendations .................. 26 3. Systemwide Issues ..................................................... 11 4.11 Redwood City bicycle parking & boardings ...... 27 4. Station‐specific Issues ............................................... 21 4.12 Redwood City issues & recommendations ........ 27 5. Innovations ................................................................. 33 4.13 Palo Alto parking & boardings ............................ 28 6. Funding and Next Steps ........................................... 37 4.14 Palo Alto issues & -
Santa Clara City Council Presentation
Caltrain Electrification Update Santa Clara City Council Presentation December 4, 2018 Agenda • Caltrain System Overview • Project Overview • Electric Train Design • Santa Clara Construction Activities • Questions Caltrain System • 32 Stations Gilroy to San Francisco • 92 Weekday Trains JPB owns right-of-way • At-Grade Crossings, from SF to San Jose viaducts, and bridges • Intermodal Connections • Bike Commuters Ridership At Capacity Today Bi-directional commute with riders standing on trains going southbound and northbound Aging Fleet At Retirement Age: 20/29 loco; 73/134 cars Regional Transportation Needs • US 101 and Interstate 280 Congested • Corridor supports growing economy • 75% Caltrain riders commute to work • 60% are choice riders Project Description Area Project Service 51 miles Electrification: Up to 79 mph • Overhead Contact Service Increase San Francisco System (OCS) • 6 trains / hour / direction to San Jose • Traction Power • More station stops / reduced travel (Tamien Station) Facilities time Electric Trains • Restore Atherton & Broadway service • 75 percent of fleet Mixed-fleet service (interim period) Continue tenant service • ACE, Capital Corridor, Amtrak, Freight Service Benefits Metric Today PCEP Example Baby Bullet Train Retain 5-6 stops 60 minutes 45 minutes Retain SF to SJ 6 stops 13 stops 60 minutes Example Redwood City Station Train stops / peak 3 5 hour Note: Prototypical Train and Schedule Key Regional Benefits (2040) Note: 2013 BAC Report, generates $2.5B economic activity and 9,600 jobs Schedule Electric Train -
Class of 2017 Annual Report
e Co th t n e e he n r p P e lo a l c c a t p s y x d e w E n r i s t a Know h L Thyself Ex ecute Your G ame Plan CLASS OF 2017 ANNUAL REPORT Table of Contents Introductory Letter .................................................................................................................................... 1 Class of 2017 Profile ................................................................................................................................... 2 Beyond Numbers ....................................................................................................................................... 4 STEP Graduates .......................................................................................................................................... 6 STEP Hiring Organizations .......................................................................................................................... 7 MA Graduates (Non-STEP) ......................................................................................................................... 8 MA Hiring Organizations & Titles ............................................................................................................. 10 MA Internship Organizations ................................................................................................................... 11 PhD Graduates ......................................................................................................................................... 12 PhD Hiring Organizations & Titles -
Redwood City Transit Center Redesign Study
Draft Summary Report Redwood City Transit Center Redesign Study October 2019 Redwood City Transit Center Redesign Study Summary Report Background ......................................................................... 1 Figure 1: Location and Components of the Existing Project History ................................................................ 1 Transit Center................................................................. 3 Figure 2: Existing Transit Center Site Configuration – Project Goals ................................................................... 2 Looking Northeast from El Camino Real .................... 13 Study Description............................................................ 4 Figure 3: Phase 1 – Short Term: Existing Transit Center Site Improvements ...................................................... 15 Existing Conditions ............................................................. 5 Figure 4: Phase 2 – Long Term: Existing Transit Center Existing Transit Services ................................................ 5 Site Improvements ....................................................... 17 Parking ............................................................................ 6 Figure 5: Perry Street and Caltrain Parking Lot Configuration – View from the Arguello Street Transit Center Amenities ................................................ 6 Side of the Site ............................................................. 18 Land Use and Zoning ...................................................... 6 Figure