Implementation and Its Consequences Hearing

IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL OVERSIGHT: IMPLEMENTATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION FEBRUARY 11, 2016 Serial No. 114–143 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ or http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 98–602PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:54 Mar 24, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\_FULL\021116\98602 SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS EDWARD R. ROYCE, California, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida BRAD SHERMAN, California DANA ROHRABACHER, California GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York STEVE CHABOT, Ohio ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey JOE WILSON, South Carolina GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida TED POE, Texas BRIAN HIGGINS, New York MATT SALMON, Arizona KAREN BASS, California DARRELL E. ISSA, California WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina ALAN GRAYSON, Florida MO BROOKS, Alabama AMI BERA, California PAUL COOK, California ALAN S. LOWENTHAL, California RANDY K. WEBER SR., Texas GRACE MENG, New York SCOTT PERRY, Pennsylvania LOIS FRANKEL, Florida RON DESANTIS, Florida TULSI GABBARD, Hawaii MARK MEADOWS, North Carolina JOAQUIN CASTRO, Texas TED S. YOHO, Florida ROBIN L. KELLY, Illinois CURT CLAWSON, Florida BRENDAN F. BOYLE, Pennsylvania SCOTT DESJARLAIS, Tennessee REID J. RIBBLE, Wisconsin DAVID A. TROTT, Michigan LEE M. ZELDIN, New York DANIEL DONOVAN, New York AMY PORTER, Chief of Staff THOMAS SHEEHY, Staff Director JASON STEINBAUM, Democratic Staff Director (II) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:54 Mar 24, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\_FULL\021116\98602 SHIRL C O N T E N T S Page WITNESSES The Honorable Stephen D. Mull, Lead Coordinator for Iran Nuclear Imple- mentation, U.S. Department of State ................................................................. 4 Mr. John Smith, Acting Director, Office of Foreign Assets Control, U.S. De- partment of the Treasury .................................................................................... 11 LETTERS, STATEMENTS, ETC., SUBMITTED FOR THE HEARING The Honorable Stephen D. Mull: Prepared statement ......................................... 7 Mr. John Smith: Prepared statement .................................................................... 13 APPENDIX Hearing notice .......................................................................................................... 56 Hearing minutes ...................................................................................................... 57 The Honorable Jeff Duncan, a Representative in Congress from the State of South Carolina: Material submitted for the record ....................................... 59 The Honorable Gerald E. Connolly, a Representative in Congress from the Commonwealth of Virginia: Prepared statement .............................................. 64 Written responses from the Honorable Stephen D. Mull to questions submitted for the record by the Honorable Michael T. McCaul, a Representa- tive in Congress from the State of Texas ........................................................... 66 (III) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:54 Mar 24, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\_FULL\021116\98602 SHIRL VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:54 Mar 24, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 F:\WORK\_FULL\021116\98602 SHIRL IRAN NUCLEAR DEAL OVERSIGHT: IMPLEMENTATION AND ITS CONSEQUENCES THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 11, 2016 HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES, COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS, Washington, DC. The committee met, pursuant to notice, at 10:04 a.m., in room 2172 Rayburn House Office Building, Hon. Edward Royce (chairman of the committee) presiding. Chairman ROYCE. This hearing will come to order. This morning the committee continues our extensive oversight of the Obama administration’s nuclear agreement with Iran, and its consequences for the national security of the United States, the consequences also for our allies. As you may know here, I feel those consequences are quite dire. January 16th was ‘‘Implementation Day,’’ and that marked an historic turning point in the Middle East because in a snap, Iran’s record was cleared, its pariah status was dropped, and this recon- nected Iran to the international trade and financial system. Now, with access to $100 billion in unfrozen assets and sanctions wiped away, Iran has instantly become the dominant country in the re- gion. The regime has achieved this all without having to end its ag- gression against its neighbors. It still calls for the overthrow of the governments in Bahrain and in Saudi Arabia and in other regional states. It has done it without swearing off on its support for terrorism. And the Iranian economy was, frankly, prior to this hemorrhaging—hemorrhaging because the sanctions which we had pushed had worked. The sanctions we pushed in 2010 and 2012 had led by 2013 to the implosion of the economy there. Now, now Iran’s leaders are predicting swift growth. And they are probably right, because we see these European countries that have observed that the sanctions dam is broken, and they are sprinting into the Iranian market to cut billions in deals and to invest there, and they are making a mockery of the administration’s claim that sanctions could ‘‘snap back’’ if Iran cheats. You tell me if these companies are going to turn back when Iran stiffs international inspec- tors. The Revolutionary Guards, already Iran’s ‘‘most powerful economic actor’’—now those are the words of our Treasury Depart- ment—the ‘‘most powerful economic actor,’’ why would that be the Iranian Guard? Because they are the ones that nationalized the (1) VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:54 Mar 24, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00005 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\_FULL\021116\98602 SHIRL 2 construction firms and the companies. So they are only going to grow more powerful with this additional international investment. Just hours after the agreement’s implementation, the regime dis- qualified 2,967 of roughly 3,000 moderate candidates from running in the parliamentary elections later this month. And after the administration finally responded to Iran’s missile tests with very minor sanctions, very de minimis sanctions, Iran’s ‘‘moderate’’ President, as he is called, ordered the military to accelerate its intercontinental ballistic missile program. That is aimed here—at the United States—and it is designed to carry a nuclear payload. That ICBM program that they are running where the Ayatollah says it is every military’s mission to help mass produce, and duty to help mass produce, ICBMs. Now worse, the administration continues to go out of its way to appease the Iranian regime, and even thanked Iran after it re- cently seized 10 U.S. sailors in a highly provocative act, if you ask me. I mean when was the last time we have seen U.S. sailors taken off their ship with their hands behind their heads, guns trained on them, their ships stripped, photographs for propaganda purposes taken, photographs of one of these sailors crying appearing in the Iranian press, and then medals, medals given to those Iranian agents who took them into custody. It appears the administration is determined to protect this deal at all costs. And just look at how the Obama administration backed away from a new bipartisan U.S. law ending visa waiver travel for those who travel to Iran, Iraq, Syria, after an outcry, after an outcry from the Iranian regime. And the administration has now de- cided to basically ignore the laws—and Iran’s ongoing sponsorship of terrorism—by stretching a narrow national security waiver far beyond reason. President Obama signed this bill into law, but has essentially allowed Iran’s Supreme Leader to veto it. And in an unusual move, the State Department settled a dec- ades-old financial settlement the day after ‘‘implementation day,’’ sending the Iranian regime a check for $1.7 billion. As you know, Mr. Ambassador, the committee eagerly awaits answers from the State Department to the many questions surrounding that surprise payment. The administration had countless opportunities to seek committee input to this matter in advance, but purposefully did not do so. That’s the conclusion I have to reach. Iran has never complied with any, any of its past nuclear-related agreements. We are watching this to see if this time it will be dif- ferent. But even if Iran meets all the administration’s expectations, in a few short years the accord will leave it the dominant power in the Middle East, and only steps away from the capability to produce nuclear weapons on an industrial scale. All the while—and this is the most vexing part to me—all the while, Iran’s leaders continued on Friday to chant ‘‘Death to America.’’ Many of us are struggling to see how this tilt toward Iran makes us safer. I now recognize the ranking member for any opening comments he may have. Mr. ENGEL. Thank you, Mr. Chairman. And thank you again for calling this hearing. Ambassador Mull, welcome to the Foreign Affairs Committee, Mr. Smith. I know, Ambassador, your current role is the latest stop VerDate 0ct 09 2002 09:54 Mar 24, 2016 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00006 Fmt 6633 Sfmt 6633 F:\WORK\_FULL\021116\98602 SHIRL 3 on a distinguished career as an American diplomat. And no matter whether we supported the Iran deal or opposed it, we are fortunate to have you as our point person on implementation and we are grateful for your service. Mr. Smith, welcome to you. Thank you for your service. Your office has led the way in cracking down on some of Iran’s worst of- fenses.

Load more