Invest User Guide, Release +VERSION+ Editors: Richard Sharp, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Spencer Wood, Anne Guerry, Heather Tallis

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Invest User Guide, Release +VERSION+ Editors: Richard Sharp, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Spencer Wood, Anne Guerry, Heather Tallis InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ Editors: Richard Sharp, Rebecca Chaplin-Kramer, Spencer Wood, Anne Guerry, Heather Tallis, Taylor Ricketts. Contributing Authors: Erik Nelson, Driss Ennaanay, Stacie Wolny, Nasser Olwero, Kari Vigerstol, Derric Penning- ton, Guillermo Mendoza, Juliann Aukema, John Foster, Jessica Forrest, Dick Cameron, Katie Arkema, Eric Lonsdorf, Christina Kennedy, Gregory Verutes, Chong-Ki Kim, Gregory Guannel, Michael Papenfus, Jodie Toft, Matthew Mar- sik, Joey Bernhardt, Robert Griffin, Kathryn Glowinski, Nicholas Chaumont, Adam Perelman, Martin Lacayo, Lisa Mandle, Perrine Hamel, Adrian L. Vogl, Lauren Rogers, Will Bierbower, Douglas Denu, James Douglass. Citation: Sharp, R., Tallis, H.T., Ricketts, T., Guerry, A.D., Wood, S.A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., Kennedy, C., Verutes, G., Kim, C.K., Guannel, G., Papenfus, M., Toft, J., Marsik, M., Bernhardt, J., Griffin, R., Glowinski, K., Chaumont, N., Perelman, A., Lacayo, M. Mandle, L., Hamel, P., Vogl, A.L., Rogers, L., Bierbower, W., Denu, D., and Douglass, J. 2018. InVEST +VERSION+ User’s Guide. The Natural Capital Project, Stanford University, University of Minnesota, The Nature Conservancy, and World Wildlife Fund. 1 InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ 2 CONTENTS 1 Introduction 5 1.1 Data Requirements and Outputs Summary Table............................5 1.2 Why We Need Tools to Map and Value Ecosystem Services......................5 1.3 Getting Started.............................................. 17 2 InVEST Models 25 2.1 Supporting Ecosystem Services:..................................... 25 2.2 Final Ecosystem Services:........................................ 77 2.3 Tools to Facilitate Ecosystem Service Analyses:............................ 252 2.4 Supporting Tools............................................. 288 3 Acknowledgements 305 3.1 Acknowledgements........................................... 305 4 PDF Version of the User’s Guide 307 3 InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ 4 CONTENTS CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION 1.1 Data Requirements and Outputs Summary Table 1.2 Why We Need Tools to Map and Value Ecosystem Services 1.2.1 Introduction Ecosystems, if properly managed, yield a flow of services that are vital to humanity, including the production of goods (e.g., food), life support processes (e.g., water purification), and life fulfilling conditions (e.g., beauty, recreation opportunities), as well as the conservation of options (e.g., genetic diversity for future use). Despite its importance, this natural capital is poorly understood, scarcely monitored, and—in many cases—undergoing rapid degradation and depletion. To bring understanding of nature’s values into decisions, the Natural Capital Project is developing models that quantify and map the values of ecosystem services. The modeling suite is best suited for analyses of multiple services and multiple objectives. The current models, which require relatively little data input, can identify areas where investment may enhance human well-being and nature. We are continuing to refine existing models and to develop new models. We use the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) definition of the term ecosystem services: “the benefits people obtain from ecosystems.” Ecosystems incorporate both biotic and abiotic components and we thus consider “ecosys- tem services” and “environmental services” to be equivalent. Natural capital is the living and non-living components of ecosystems that contribute to the provision of ecosystem services. Capital assets take many forms including man- ufactured capital (e.g., buildings and machines), human capital (knowledge, experience, and health), social capital (relationships and institutions), as well as natural capital. 1.2.2 Who should use InVEST? InVEST is designed to inform decisions about natural resource management. Essentially, it provides information about how changes in ecosystems are likely to lead to changes in the flows of benefits to people. Decision-makers, from governments to non-profits to corporations, often manage lands and waters for multiple uses and inevitably must evaluate trade-offs among these uses. InVEST’s multi-service, modular design provides an effective tool for exploring the likely outcomes of alternative management and climate scenarios and for evaluating trade-offs among sectors and services. For example, government agencies could use InVEST to help determine how to manage lands, coasts, and marine areas to provide a desirable range of benefits to people or to help design permitting and mitigation programs that sustain nature’s benefits to society. Conservation organizations could use InVEST to better align their missions to protect biodiversity with activities that improve human livelihoods. Corporations, such as consumer goods companies, renewable energy companies, and water utilities, could also use InVEST to decide how and where to invest in natural capital to ensure that their supply chains are sustainable and secure. InVEST can help answer questions like: 5 InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ 6 Chapter 1. Introduction InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ 1.2. Why We Need Tools to Map and Value Ecosystem Services 7 InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ 8 Chapter 1. Introduction InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ 1.2. Why We Need Tools to Map and Value Ecosystem Services 9 InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ • Where do ecosystem services originate and where are they consumed? • How does a proposed forestry management plan affect timber yields, biodiversity, water quality and recreation? • What kinds of coastal management and fishery policies will yield the best returns for sustainable fisheries, shoreline protection and recreation? • Which parts of a watershed provide the greatest carbon sequestration, biodiversity, and tourism values? • Where would reforestation achieve the greatest downstream water quality benefits while maintaining or mini- mizing losses in water flows? • How will climate change and population growth impact ecosystem services and biodiversity? • What benefits does marine spatial planning provide to society in addition to food from fishing and aquaculture and secure locations for renewable energy facilities? 1.2.3 Introduction to InVEST InVEST is a tool for exploring how changes in ecosystems are likely to lead to changes in benefits that flow to people. InVEST often employs a production function approach to quantifying and valuing ecosystem services. A production function specifies the output of ecosystem services provided by the environment given its condition and processes. Once a production function is specified, we can quantify the impact of changes on land or in the water on changes on the level of ecosystem service output. InVEST uses a simple framework delineating “supply, service, and value” to link production functions to the benefits provided to people (Figure 1). “Supply” represents what is potentially available from the ecosystem (ie. what the ecosystem structure and function can provide). For example, this would be the wave attenuation and subsequent reduction in erosion and flooding onshore provided by a particular location and density of mangrove forest. “Service” incorporates demand and thus uses information about beneficiaries of that service (e.g., where people live, important cultural sites, infrastructure, etc.). “Value” includes social preference and allows for the calculation of economic and social metrics (e.g., avoided damages from erosion and flooding, numbers of people affected). The InVEST toolset described in this guide includes models for quantifying, mapping, and valuing the benefits pro- vided by terrestrial, freshwater, and marine systems. We group models in InVEST into three primary categories: 1) 10 Chapter 1. Introduction InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ Fig. 1: The ecosystem service supply chain, linking ecological function to ecosystem services and the benefits provided to people (From Tallis et al. 2012, Bioscience) 1.2. Why We Need Tools to Map and Value Ecosystem Services 11 InVEST User Guide, Release +VERSION+ supporting services, 2) final services, and 3) tools to facilitate ecosystem service analyses. Supporting services un- derpin other ecosystem services, but do not directly provide benefits to people. Final services provide direct benefits to people. For final services, we split the services into their biophysical supply and the service to people wherever possible; these are delineated in the model names as Supply: Service. For some final services, we model the service directly, without modeling the supply separately. These are listed as the models below without the use of a colon, and also below in Figure 3. Supporting Ecosystem Services: • Marine Water Quality • Habitat Risk Assessment • Habitat Quality Final Ecosystem Services: • Carbon Storage and Sequestration: Climate Regulation • Blue Carbon Storage and Sequestration: Climate Regulation • Water Yield: Reservoir Hydropower Production • Nutrient Retention: Water Purification • Sediment Retention: Avoided Dredging and Water Purification • Pollinator Abundance: Crop Pollination • Coastal Exposure and Vulnerability • Wave Attenuation & Erosion Reduction: Coastal Protection (only in ArcGIS version) • Unobstructed Views: Scenic Quality Provision • Nature-based Recreation and Tourism • Managed Timber Production • Wave Energy Production • Offshore Wind Energy Production • Marine
Recommended publications
  • Chapter 10. a First Look at Nunatsiavut Kangidualuk ('Fjord') Ecosystems
    Chapter 10. A first look at Nunatsiavut Kangidualuk (‘fjord’) ecosystems Lead author Tanya Brown1,2,3, Ken Reimer3, Tom Sheldon4, Trevor Bell5 1Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC; 2Institute of Ocean Sciences, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Sidney, BC; 3Environmental Sciences Group, Royal Military College of Canada, Kingston, ON; 4Nunatsiavut Government, Nain, NF; 5Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NF Contributing authors S. Bentley, R. Pienitz, M. Gosselin, M. Blais, M. Carpenter, E. Estrada, T. Richerol, E. Kahlmeyer, S. Luque, B. Sjare, A. Fisk, S. Iverson Abstract Long marine inlets that are classified as either fjords or fjards indent the Labrador coast. Along the moun- tainous north coast a classic fjord landscape dominates, with deep (up to ~300 m) muddy basins separated by rocky sills and flanked by high (up to 1,000 m), steep sidewalls. In contrast, the fjards of the central and southern coast are generally shallow (150 m), irregularly shaped inlets with gently sloping sidewalls and large intertidal zones. These fjords and fjards are important feeding grounds for marine mammals and seabirds and are commonly used by Inuit for hunting and travel. Despite their ecological and socio-cultural importance, these marine ecosystems are largely understudied. The Nunatsiavut Nuluak project has, as a primary goal, to undertake baseline inventories and comparative assessments of representative marine ecosystems in Labrador, including benthic and pelagic community composition, distribution and abun- dance, fjord processes, and oceanographic conditions. A case study demonstrating ecosystem resilience to anthropogenic disturbance is examined. This information provides a foundation for further research and monitoring as climate change and anthropogenic pressures alter recent baselines.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterisation and Prediction of Large-Scale, Long-Term Change of Coastal Geomorphological Behaviours: Final Science Report
    Characterisation and prediction of large-scale, long-term change of coastal geomorphological behaviours: Final science report Science Report: SC060074/SR1 Product code: SCHO0809BQVL-E-P The Environment Agency is the leading public body protecting and improving the environment in England and Wales. It’s our job to make sure that air, land and water are looked after by everyone in today’s society, so that tomorrow’s generations inherit a cleaner, healthier world. Our work includes tackling flooding and pollution incidents, reducing industry’s impacts on the environment, cleaning up rivers, coastal waters and contaminated land, and improving wildlife habitats. This report is the result of research commissioned by the Environment Agency’s Science Department and funded by the joint Environment Agency/Defra Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research and Development Programme. Published by: Author(s): Environment Agency, Rio House, Waterside Drive, Richard Whitehouse, Peter Balson, Noel Beech, Alan Aztec West, Almondsbury, Bristol, BS32 4UD Brampton, Simon Blott, Helene Burningham, Nick Tel: 01454 624400 Fax: 01454 624409 Cooper, Jon French, Gregor Guthrie, Susan Hanson, www.environment-agency.gov.uk Robert Nicholls, Stephen Pearson, Kenneth Pye, Kate Rossington, James Sutherland, Mike Walkden ISBN: 978-1-84911-090-7 Dissemination Status: © Environment Agency – August 2009 Publicly available Released to all regions All rights reserved. This document may be reproduced with prior permission of the Environment Agency. Keywords: Coastal geomorphology, processes, systems, The views and statements expressed in this report are management, consultation those of the author alone. The views or statements expressed in this publication do not necessarily Research Contractor: represent the views of the Environment Agency and the HR Wallingford Ltd, Howbery Park, Wallingford, Oxon, Environment Agency cannot accept any responsibility for OX10 8BA, 01491 835381 such views or statements.
    [Show full text]
  • OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES an Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals
    OREGON ESTUARINE INVERTEBRATES An Illustrated Guide to the Common and Important Invertebrate Animals By Paul Rudy, Jr. Lynn Hay Rudy Oregon Institute of Marine Biology University of Oregon Charleston, Oregon 97420 Contract No. 79-111 Project Officer Jay F. Watson U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 500 N.E. Multnomah Street Portland, Oregon 97232 Performed for National Coastal Ecosystems Team Office of Biological Services Fish and Wildlife Service U.S. Department of Interior Washington, D.C. 20240 Table of Contents Introduction CNIDARIA Hydrozoa Aequorea aequorea ................................................................ 6 Obelia longissima .................................................................. 8 Polyorchis penicillatus 10 Tubularia crocea ................................................................. 12 Anthozoa Anthopleura artemisia ................................. 14 Anthopleura elegantissima .................................................. 16 Haliplanella luciae .................................................................. 18 Nematostella vectensis ......................................................... 20 Metridium senile .................................................................... 22 NEMERTEA Amphiporus imparispinosus ................................................ 24 Carinoma mutabilis ................................................................ 26 Cerebratulus californiensis .................................................. 28 Lineus ruber .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • NATURA 2000 Data Form
    Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9 th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). 8 9 : ; < = 9 > ? 9 @ A B C ; > < D E F G H H H H H ; I J K < 9 L C M N ; ? 9 @ A C ; : ; M B O P ? ? 9 > M P O ? ; Q B : : ; P : : P ? ; M R S T U V W V X Y Z [ \ Y X ] ^ V W _ ` a b _ ] U b W ] ^ c Y Z d Y e T U ] X b W f X g ] F l H H h W c Y Z e V X b Y W i g ] ] X Y W j V e ^ V Z k ] X U V W _ ^ 9 @ A B C ; > < P > ; < : > 9 O m C n P M o B < ; M : 9 > ; P M : B < m L B M P O ? ; N ; = 9 > ; = B C C B O m B O : ; F I J K p F q H H L > : ; > B O = 9 > @ P : B 9 O P O M m L B M P O ? ; B O < L A A 9 > : 9 = I P @ < P > < B : ; M ; < B m O P : B 9 O < P > ; A > 9 o B M ; M B O : ; i X Z V X ] f b d r Z V e ] s Y Z t c Y Z p X g ] c a X a Z ] _ ] u ] U Y T e ] W X Y c X g ] v b ^ X Y c k ] X U V W _ ^ Y c h W X ] Z W V X b Y W V U h e T Y Z X V W d ] w I P @ < P > x B < ; y < ; z P O M N 9 9 { | } O M l ~ F E F H H ; M B : B 9 O } P < P @ ; O M ; M N n I ; < 9 C L : B 9 O J O O ; > M ; M B : B 9 O 9 = : ; z P O M N 9 9 { } B O ? 9 > A 9 > P : B O m : ; < ; p F P @ ; O M @ ; O : < } B < B O A > ; A P > P : B 9 O P O M Q B C C N ; P o P B C P N C ; B O F ~ H H H F l O ? ; ? 9 @ A C ; : ; M } : ; I J K w P O M P ? ? 9 @ A P O n B O m @ P A w < < 9 L C M N ; < L N @ B : : ; M : 9 : ; I P @ < P > K ; ? > ; : P > B P : 9 @ A B C ; > < H H H F < 9 L C M A > 9 o B M ; P O ; C ; ? : > 9 O B ? w K x 9 > M ? 9 A n 9 = : ; I J K P O M } Q ; > ; A 9 < < B N C ; } M B m B : P C ? 9 A B ; < 9 = P C C @ P A < ¡ ¢ ¡ £ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ § ¨ ¦ ¡ © 2 ¡ ¢ £ ¤ ¥ ¦ ¢ £ § ¨ ¢ © ¥ § ª « ¦ ¬ ­ ¢ ® ¯ .
    [Show full text]
  • Development and Demonstration of Systems Based Estuary Simulators
    General enquiries on this form should be made to: Defra, Science Directorate, Management Support and Finance Team, Telephone No. 020 7238 1612 E-mail: [email protected] SID 5 Research Project Final Report z Note In line with the Freedom of Information Act 2000, Defra aims to place the results Project identification of its completed research projects in the public domain wherever possible. The FD2117 SID 5 (Research Project Final Report) is 1. Defra Project code designed to capture the information on the results and outputs of Defra-funded 2. Project title research in a format that is easily Development and Demonstration of Systems-Based publishable through the Defra website. A Estuary Simulators (EstSim) SID 5 must be completed for all projects. • This form is in Word format and the boxes may be expanded or reduced, as 3. Contractor ABP Marine Environmental Research appropriate. organisation(s) Ltd (Lead Contractor) z ACCESS TO INFORMATION University of Plymouth; The information collected on this form will University College London; be stored electronically and may be sent HR Wallingford to any part of Defra, or to individual Deltares researchers or organisations outside Disovery Software Defra for the purposes of reviewing the project. Defra may also disclose the information to any outside organisation acting as an agent authorised by Defra to 4. Total Defra project costs £ 235,000 process final research reports on its behalf. Defra intends to publish this form (agreed fixed price) on its website, unless there are strong reasons not to, which fully comply with 5. Project: start date...............
    [Show full text]
  • Cynthia Winings Gallery
    ROAD WArrIOR Swept Away We interrupt this magazine for OM C O. C a live feed directly from the Secretary of Defense’s house. HELL; POLITI C IT BY COLIN W. SARGENT M uring the Reagan presidency, everyone on Earth knew that Secretary of De- fense Caspar Weinberger (1917-2006) MILY CARTER E D kept a getaway place up in Maine. But it was more something imagined than ac- tually seen. Far fewer knew where it was, or how luxuriant it was, or that it was once owned by Mary King Auchincloss. Listed for sale this sum- HE KOWLES COMPANY; T mer for $2.15M, “Windswept,” built in 1910, en- joys a classic view of Somes Sound on Mount FROM TOP: Desert Island. Positioned to advantage at 584 SUMMERGUIDE 2 0 1 6 1 4 7 A Chat With Caspar W. Weinberger, Jr. Caspar Willard Weinberger, Jr, known as “Cap,” is the son of Caspar Weinberger, prominent statesman and, most notably, U.S. Secretary of Defense under the Rea- gan administration from 1981 to 1987. Cap’s mother, Jane Weinberger, was an author and publisher from Milford, Maine. Born in 1947, Cap studied at Harvard–his father’s alma mater–and earned a B.A. in Modern British History in 1968. He lived in San Francisco for many years, working as an award-winning producer, director, and writer of documentary films for an NBC affiliate. Cap settled in Mount Desert in 1997. Today he is a writer and lecturer, as well as running Windswept House Publish- ers, started by his mother in 1984.
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Terms A
    Geographical Terms A abrasion Wearing of rock surfaces by agronomy Agric. economy, including friction, where abrasive material is theory and practice of animal hus­ transported by running water, ice, bandry, crop production and soil wind, waves, etc. management. abrasion platform Coastal rock plat­ aiguille Prominent needle-shaped form worn nearly smooth by abrasion. rock-peak, usually above snow-line and formed by frost action. absolute humidity Amount of water vapour per unit volume ofair. ait Small island in river or lake. abyssal Ocean deeps between 1,200 alfalfa Deep-rooted perennial plant, and 3,000 fathoms, where sunlight does largely used as fodder-crop since its not penetrate and there is no plant life. deep roots withstand drought. Pro­ duced mainly in U.S.A. and Argentina. accessibility Nearness or centrality of one function or place to other functions allocation-location problem Problem or places measured in terms ofdistance, of locating facilities, services, factories time, cost, etc. etc. in any area so that transport costs are minimized, thresholds are met and acre-foot Amount of water required total population is served. to cover I acre of land to depth of I ft. (43,560 cu. ft.). alluvial cone Form of alluvial fan, consisting of mass of thick coarse adiabatic Relating to chan~e occurr­ material. ing in temp. of a mass of gas, III ascend­ ing or descending air masses, without alluvial fan Mass of sand or gravel actual gain or loss ofheat from outside. deposited by stream where it leaves constricted course for main valley. afforestation Deliberate planting of trees where none ever grew or where alluvium Sand, silt and gravel laid none have grown recently.
    [Show full text]
  • Estuary Processes and Geomorphology
    EstuaryEstuary ProcessesProcesses andand Geomorphology:Geomorphology: OutputsOutputs ofof ERP2ERP2 Alun Williams ProjectProject FD2119 FD2119 EstuariesEstuaries Research Research Programme Programme Phase Phase 2 2 TrainingTraining Event Event November November 2007 2007 Overview • UK Estuary Types • Estuary Processes • ERP2 Projects: – FD1905 - Estuary Process Research Project (EstProc) – FD2107 - Hybrid Estuary Model Development – FD2116 - Review of Geomorphological Concepts – FD2117 - Estuary Simulators Development (EstSim) Project FD2119 Estuaries Research Programme Phase 2 Training Event November 2007 Classification of UK Estuary Types • ERP2 developed UK database based on: – EMPHASYS database – Futurecoast database – JNCC inventory. • Futurecoast (Dyer, 2002) classification amended and simplified: - Working typology for UK estuaries • Identify range of UK Estuaries: – Behavioural estuary types; – Geomorphological elements present within each. Project FD2119 Estuaries Research Programme Phase 2 Training Event November 2007 Estuary Typology 2 4 3 1 Cliff Type Type Dune Delta Basin Spits Origin Drainage Drainage Mud Flats Sand Flats Channels Salt Marsh Flood Plain Flood Behavioural Behavioural Barrier Beach Rock Platform Rock Linear Banks 1FGlacial valley jordX XXX XX 2Fjard0/1/2 XXXXX XX 3Ria0/1/2 XX XXX X Drowned river 4 Spit enclosed /1/2 X E/F X/N XXXXXX valley 5 Funnel shaped X XE/F X XXX XX 6 Marine/fluvial Embayment X XX XXX X 7Drowned Tidal inlet 0/1/XXE/F X XXX X coastal plain Notes: 1 Spits: 0/1/2 refers to number of spits; E/F refers to ebb/flood deltas; N refers to no low water channel; X indicates a significant presence. 2 Linear Banks: considered as alternative form of delta. 3 Channels: refers to presence of ebb/flood channels associated with deltas or an estuary subtidal channel.
    [Show full text]
  • Acadia National Park Centennial Logo Contest Creative Brief
    Acadia National Park Centennial Logo Contest Creative Brief PROJECT: Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of Acadia National Park “It is an opportunity of singular interest, so to develop and preserve the wild charm and beauty of this unique spot on our Atlantic coast that future generations may rejoice in it yet more than we…” —George B. Dorr WHAT IS THE ASSIGNMENT? Develop a logo for Commemorating the 100th Anniversary of Acadia National Park Deliver mechanical artwork for logo WHAT ISSUE ARE WE ADDRESSING? Centennial Vision: Acadia National Park’s 100th Anniversary will encourage people to celebrate Acadia National Park’s rich natural and cultural history, and inspire people to make a personal connection with the park and work for the best possible future for this national treasure. Centennial Tagline: Acadia’s Centennial: Celebrate our past! Inspire our future! The 100th Anniversary of Acadia National Park celebrates the rich natural and cultural history that comes together to make Acadia National Park a premier vacation destination and one of the gems of the National Park System, and inspires today’s park visitors to contribute to Acadia’s ongoing protection. This celebration pays tribute to the natural scenic beauty that inspired early conservationists to support its protection and that continues to inspire visitors today. It honors the relationships that have grown up between the park and the surrounding community, and recognizes the role that Acadia National Park has come to play for the many individuals and families that visit seeking recreation, adventure, rejuvenation, and solitude. The 100th Anniversary Celebration recognizes the power of the past, the rich cultural and natural history of the park, and welcomes its influence in shaping and inspiring the management actions and stewards of the present and future.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Strait to the Meromictic Lake: Water Bodies of Fjard and Skerry
    SI: “The 4th International Conference Limnology and Freshwater Biology 2020 (4): 495-497 DOI:10.31951/2658-3518-2020-A-4-495 Palaeolimnology of Northern Eurasia” Short communication From the strait to the meromictic lake: water bodies of fjard and skerry coasts, their relief, hydrological features, and ecological communities (on the example of Lake Kislo-Sladkoe, Karelian Coast of the White Sea, Russia) Repkina T.Yu.1*, Krasnova E.D.1, Leontev P.A.2*, Entin A.L.1, Alyautdinov A.R.1, Efimova L.E.1, Frolova N.L.1, Lugovoy N.N.1, Romanenko F.A.1, Voronov D.A.1,3 1 Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory, 1, Moscow, 119991, Russia 2 Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia, Nab. Moyki 48, St. Petersburg, 191186, Russia 3 A.Kharkevich Institute for Information Transmission Problems of Russian Academy of Science. Bolshoy Karetny per. 19, build.1, Moscow 127051 Russia ABSTRACT. The purpose of the study is to reconstruct the evolution of bodies of water on the fjard and skerrie shores by their uplift. The object of the study is the Lake Kislo-Sladkoe on the Karelian Coast of the White Sea (Russia). It was established that Lake Kislo-Sladkoe was a narrow strait with fast tidal currents up to 600-500 years ago; about 100-150 years ago it became a semi-enclosed lagoon; and since the 1960s the isolation progressed to such a stage that communication with the sea is now limited to monthly reflux of sea water during syzygy tides. Most of the time the lake is stratified, autumn mixing occurs on average once every two years during autumn storms.
    [Show full text]
  • Accessibility Guide
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Acadia National Park Accessibility Guide Table of Contents Map of Popular Park Locations 2 General Information 3 Entrance Fees Service Animals For Your Health 3 Air Quality Medical Information Physical and Mobility Resources 4 Getting Around Parking Accessible Facilities and Areas 4 Visitor Centers Beaches 5 Campgrounds Picnic Areas Stores and Restaurants Within the Park 6 Activities 6 Trails Carriage Roads Other Sites of Interest 7 Park Ranger Programs Ranger-led Boat Cruises Scenic Driving Areas 8 Resources for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing 8 Park Ranger Programs Assistive Listening Devices Park Orientation Video Resources for the Blind and Low Vision 8 Park Orientation Video Audio Tour 1 Map of Popular Park Locations 3 3 Thompson Island Information Center 102 198 Hulls Cove Visitor Center Bar Island 3 BAR HARBOR 233 Park Headquarters 233 198 Sieur de Bear Brook Picnic Area Eagle Lake Monts Somesville Nature Center 102 S O Cadillac M E Mountain S 3 Bubble Pond S 3 O U 198 N Pretty Marsh D Ikes Picnic Area Jordan Pond Point e v i Sand Beach r one way D t Thunder Hole n Jordan Pond a e g r House a S Fabbri Picnic Area Echo 102 Lake Otter Point Blackwoods Campground 102 SEAL HARBOR NORTHEAST HARBOR 3 Seal Cove SOUTHWEST HARBOR Acadia National Park Park Loop Road Accessible Carriage Roads 102 North 0 2 Kilometers 0 2 Miles 102A Seawall Campground 102A BERNARD BASS HARBOR Bass Harbor Head Light 2 General Information Entrance Fees $ U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Systems Approach and Behavioural Models
    TheThe SystemsSystems ApproachApproach Alun Williams, ABPmer FD2107/FD2117/FD2119 Estuaries Research Programme Phase 2 Dissemination Event 2 July 2007 OverviewOverview •What is – A Systems Approach? – Behavioural / Qualitative Modelling? • System Definition / Mapping – (Behavioural Statements Objective) FD2107/FD2117/FD2119 Estuaries Research Programme Phase 2 Dissemination Event 2 July 2007 What is a Systems Approach? • Defining individual components that make up a given environment and characterising how these components interact; • In order to explain how different elements interact and respond to change FD2107/FD2117/FD2119 Estuaries Research Programme Phase 2 Dissemination Event 2 July 2007 Systems Diagrams • Means of capturing key attributes of a systems • Flowchart representation of a system • Dependant on underlying knowledge of processes FD2107/FD2117/FD2119 Estuaries Research Programme Phase 2 Dissemination Event 2 July 2007 -ve Tidal -ve Lower Tidal Channels Flat -ve -ve Flood Delta -ve Updrift -ve Dunes -ve -ve -ve Downdrift Updrift -ve Coast Coast -ve -ve -ve -ve -ve Ebb Delta -ve positive effect negative effect -ve -ve Signed graph representation for the impacts of sea- level rise on an inlet or lagoon entrance (Capobianco et al., 1999) FD2107/FD2117/FD2119 Estuaries Research Programme Phase 2 Dissemination Event 2 July 2007 Precipitation Evaporation Overland flow Slope System Channel System Overland flow Groundwater Flow water sediments Major flows Ocean Store solutes sediments Minor flows solutes Diagram showing the pathways
    [Show full text]