DOCSLIB.ORG

CENTENNIAL CHALLENGES PROGRAM Break the Ice Lunar Challenge REQUEST for INFORMATION (RFI)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CENTENNIAL CHALLENGES PROGRAM Break the Ice Lunar Challenge REQUEST for INFORMATION (RFI) NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION (NASA) CENTENNIAL CHALLENGES PROGRAM Break the Ice Lunar Challenge REQUEST FOR INFORMATION (RFI) 1. PROGRAM BACKGROUND The Centennial Challenges Program seeks to stimulate research and technology solutions to support NASA missions and inspire new national aerospace capabilities through public prize competitions. The program is an integral part of NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate, which is innovating, developing, testing, and flying hardware for use in NASA's future missions. For more information about NASA's Space Technology Mission Directorate, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/spacetech. 2. SUMMARY The Centennial Challenges program is seeking input for a proposed Break the Ice Lunar Challenge competition expected to start no earlier than November 2020. The goal of the competition is to enable new solutions for autonomous lunar icy regolith excavation technologies. This Challenge will require competitors to develop solutions that meet minimum requirements and demonstrate robust performance in simulated lunar conditions at designated NASA (or other) test facilities. NASA’s ultimate goal is to incentivize lunar excavation solutions that could be adapted for operation on the lunar surface, while also advancing excavation technologies for terrestrial commercialization. This RFI seeks to: (1) gather feedback on the technical rules of the competition being considered; (2) gather feedback on the proposed prize amounts and distribution structure; and (3) determine the interest level in potentially competing in , judging, and partnering with NASA to support this challenge. Specific information sought is detailed in Sections 6-8. NASA welcomes all segments of the public, industry, academia, and government, including associations, innovators, makers and enthusiasts to reply to this RFI. This RFI is for informational/planning purposes only and the Government will not be responsible for any cost associated with preparing information in support of this RFI. This RFI is NOT to be construed as a commitment by the government to enter into any agreement or other obligation or to conduct the Break the Ice Lunar Challenge. This notice is issued in accordance with the NASA Prize Authority, 51 U.S.C. § 20144. Responses may be made available for public review and should not include proprietary information. Submitted information will be shared within NASA and with contractor personnel associated with the NASA Centennial Challenges Program. All responses are to be for general access by government reviewers. For general information on the NASA Centennial Challenges Program see: http://www.nasa.gov/challenges. The point of contact is Ms. Monsi Roman, Program Manager, Centennial Challenges Program, NASA Marshall Space Flight Center, email to [email protected]. 3. BACKGROUND NASA is considering opening Break the Ice Lunar Challenge competition to incentivize solutions to address technology gaps in the icy regolith excavation and water delivery technologies that could help enable initial human presence on the Moon by 2024 and a sustainable human presence on the Moon by 2028. The Break the Ice Lunar Challenge seeks to incentivize innovative approaches for excavating icy regolith and delivering water in extreme lunar environments. The Challenge seeks to incentivize solutions for maximizing water delivery while minimizing energy use and the mass of equipment required to be transported to the lunar surface. 4. CHALLENGE DESCRIPTION Break the Ice Lunar Challenge competition is expected to be performed in 2 phases, that will not exceed a total of 36 months. As NASA works to extend human exploration of the solar system, a sustained presence on the Moon will critical for developing and testing the technologies and systems needed for future missions to Mars and beyond. In situ resource utilization (ISRU)—the development of lunar materials for life support, fuel, energy, manufacturing, and construction—is necessary to limit the delivery of supplies from Earth. One of the most important of these resources is water. Water supports all life on Earth, and will be critical to supporting human exploration beyond Earth. On the Moon, water is trapped in icy regolith at the lunar poles, including inside permanently dark and cold craters. NASA has identified key technology gaps related to excavation of icy regolith and delivery of water that could be addressed through a Challenge. These gaps include: • Excavation of large quantities of icy regolith • Delivery of large quantities of water • Hardware and equipment that is light weight and energy efficient • Hardware and equipment that is reliable and durable in extreme lunar environments, including: o Extreme cold and permanent or near-permanent darkness o Vacuum conditions o Dust levels found on the lunar surface o Reduced gravity The Break the Ice Lunar Challenge seeks to incentivize innovative approaches for excavating icy regolith and delivering water in extreme lunar environments. The challenge seeks to incentivize solutions for maximizing water delivery while minimizing the energy use and mass of equipment required to be transported to the lunar surface. 5. DRAFT CHALLENGE RULES AND COMPETITION STRUCTURE Based upon responses to this RFI, NASA may update detailed written challenge rules (“Rules”). The final Rules would be the official specification of the competition structure. Phase 1 of the Break the Ice Lunar Challenge is focused on incentivizing new ideas and approaches to a system architecture for excavation and movement of icy regolith and water on the lunar surface. The Challenge describes a hypothetical Mission Scenario and asks Teams to design a system architecture design addressing necessary hardware, concept of operations, lunar environmental conditions, and specific performance analyses, as well as supporting materials that address credibility and feasibility of the design. The Break the Ice Lunar Challenge will have up to two phases, totaling no more than 36 months. In Phase 1, Teams will have approximately seven (7) months to register and submit a design. Phase 1, including approximately two (2) months of judging, will last a total of nine (9) months. Prize purse for Phase 1 will total up to $500,000. Table 1. Phase 1 Prize Purses 1st Place $125,000 2nd Place $75,000 3rd Place $50,000 Up to (10) Runners Up ($25,000 each) $250,000 Total $500,000 Following Phase 1, NASA may initiate a Phase 2 (prize purse up to $4.5 million) of the Challenge, which is expected to focus on designing and building excavation hardware components and/or systems that would be tested in simulated lunar conditions. Refer to the accompanying rules document to learn about the rules and requirements for Phase 1. • Phase 1 Open Call for Registration o Objective: During the registration period, all interested competitors must register on the challenge website; complete the required forms; and meet all eligibility requirements as stated in the official rules in order to participate. o Duration: ~7 Months • Phase 1: Participants will submit a system architecture and video o Objective: To identify a solution to excavation architecture at Lunar south pole. o Competitors will provide: ▪ Detailed narrative and supporting illustrations, models, data, or other materials describing the elements listed in the rules document. ▪ Supporting visual representation of the technology (video). o Scoring: The design will be judged by a panel of experts using a pre-established set of requirements. o Awards: Prize purses for Phase 1 will total up to $500,000. Refer to the above table for Prize distribution. o Duration: 7 months (concurrent with Open Call for Registration) 6. INFORMATION SOUGHT FROM COMMENTERS This RFI seeks feedback on the anticipated competition structure, the prize amounts and distribution structure, and level of interest in competing in the challenge. Feedback relative to interest in competing in the competition will influence the decision to proceed forward in formulation and development of this challenge. Responses on all sections are not required, but more information will help with the overall formulation of the challenge. Specific requested information is as follows: a) Interest and Readiness: • Are you interested in participating as a competitor in this competition? o What type of skills do you think your team would need to compete? ▪ If you do not have the skills you think you need, where would you recruit individuals and/or organizations with those skills? o Do you have a relevant production system ready or nearly ready to participate in this Challenge? ▪ If yes, what level of development and investment is needed before your system is ready to participate in the Challenge? • Would you or your organization be interested in participating as a judge or event partner (if not interested in competing)? • What barriers limit your interest or ability to participate? How can these barriers be addressed in the timelines, requirements and formulation of this Challenge? • Are there specific emerging breakthrough technologies that are applicable to the Challenge goals? • What actions could be taken to increase public interest in participating in and following this Challenge? o What messaging could we use to excite the public? Can you envision any specific demonstrations that would be exciting to the public? • Part of this challenge will potentially be tested in a facility. Do you have any ideas on how to make that exciting? b) Competition Structure: • Are the goals reasonable in relation
Load more

Recommended publications
  • NASA's Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitat
    https://ntrs.nasa.gov/search.jsp?R=20180006397 2019-08-31T18:36:43+00:00Z NASA’s Centennial Challenge for 3D-Printed Habitat: Phase II Outcomes and Phase III Competition Overview Prater, T.J.1, T. Kim2, M. Roman2, R. Mueller3 1NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Materials and Processes Laboratory 2NASA, Marshall Space Flight Center, Centennial Challenges Program Office 3NASA, Kennedy Space Center, Senior Technologist The 3D-Printed Habitat Challenge is part of NASA’s Centennial Challenges Program. NASA’s Centennial Challenges seek to accelerate innovation in aerospace technology development through public competitions. The 3D-Printed Habitat Challenge, launched in 2015, is part of the Centennial Challenges portfolio and focuses on habitat design and development of large-scale additive construction systems capable of fabricating structures from in situ materials and/or mission recyclables. The challenge is a partnership between NASA, Caterpillar (primary sponsor), Bechtel, Brick and Mortar Ventures, and Bradley University. Phase I of the challenge was an architectural concept competition in which participants generated conceptual renderings of habitats on Mars which could be constructed using locally available resources. Phase II asked teams to develop the printing systems and material formulations needed to translate these designs into reality. Work under the phase II competition, which concluded in August 2017 with a head to head competition at Caterpillar’s Edward Demonstration Facility in Peoria, Illinois, is discussed, including the key technology development outcomes resulting from this portion of the competition. The phase III competition consists of both virtual and construction subcompetitions. Virtual construction asks teams to render high fidelity architectural models of a habitat and all the accompanying information required for construction of the pressure retaining and load bearing portions of the structure.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Technology Mission Directorate Briefing
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Technology Mission Directorate Briefing AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites Presented by: Dr. Michael Gazarik Associate Administrator, Space Technology Mission Directorate August 12, 2013 www.nasa.gov/spacetech Why Invest in Space Technology? • Enables a new class of NASA missions Addresses National Needs beyond low Earth Orbit. A generation of studies and reports • Delivers innovative solutions that (40+ since 1980) document the need dramatically improve technological for regular investment in new, capabilities for NASA and the Nation. transformative space • Develops technologies and capabilities that technologies. make NASA’s missions more affordable and more reliable. • Invests in the economy by creating markets and spurring innovation for traditional and emerging aerospace business. • Engages the brightest minds from academia in solving NASA’s tough technological challenges. Who: Value to NASA Value to the Nation The NASA Workforce Academia Industry & Small Businesses Other Government Agencies The Broader Aerospace Enterprise 2 Challenges for Deep Space Exploration Trends in Space Technology Space Technology Portfolio Early Stage Innovation Technology Technology Technology Crosscutting Game Changing Small Spacecraft Breakthroughs Demonstration Transformative & Transformative Development (ETD/CSTD) Missions (ETD/CSTD) Technologies (CSTD) Concepts/ Concepts/ Pioneering Pioneering Innovation Innovation Developing Developing Community NASA Innovative Space Technology Center Innovation
    [Show full text]
  • Space Planes and Space Tourism: the Industry and the Regulation of Its Safety
    Space Planes and Space Tourism: The Industry and the Regulation of its Safety A Research Study Prepared by Dr. Joseph N. Pelton Director, Space & Advanced Communications Research Institute George Washington University George Washington University SACRI Research Study 1 Table of Contents Executive Summary…………………………………………………… p 4-14 1.0 Introduction…………………………………………………………………….. p 16-26 2.0 Methodology…………………………………………………………………….. p 26-28 3.0 Background and History……………………………………………………….. p 28-34 4.0 US Regulations and Government Programs………………………………….. p 34-35 4.1 NASA’s Legislative Mandate and the New Space Vision………….……. p 35-36 4.2 NASA Safety Practices in Comparison to the FAA……….…………….. p 36-37 4.3 New US Legislation to Regulate and Control Private Space Ventures… p 37 4.3.1 Status of Legislation and Pending FAA Draft Regulations……….. p 37-38 4.3.2 The New Role of Prizes in Space Development…………………….. p 38-40 4.3.3 Implications of Private Space Ventures…………………………….. p 41-42 4.4 International Efforts to Regulate Private Space Systems………………… p 42 4.4.1 International Association for the Advancement of Space Safety… p 42-43 4.4.2 The International Telecommunications Union (ITU)…………….. p 43-44 4.4.3 The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (COPUOS).. p 44 4.4.4 The European Aviation Safety Agency…………………………….. p 44-45 4.4.5 Review of International Treaties Involving Space………………… p 45 4.4.6 The ICAO -The Best Way Forward for International Regulation.. p 45-47 5.0 Key Efforts to Estimate the Size of a Private Space Tourism Business……… p 47 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Office of Exploration Systems Program Overview
    Office of Exploration Systems Program Overview March 2 - 3, 2004 Associate Administrator, Office of Exploration Systems Rear Admiral Craig E. Steidle (Ret.) 2004 President’s Vision for Space Exploration A New Future for U.S. Civil Space Programs • On January 14, 2004, President Bush articulated a new Vision for Space Exploration in the 21st Century • This Vision encompasses a broad range of human and robotic missions, including the Moon, Mars and destinations beyond • It establishes clear goals and objectives, but sets equally clear budgetary ‘boundaries’ by stating firm priorities and tough choices • It also establishes as policy the goals of pursuing commercial and international collaboration in realizing the new vision • Advances in Human and Robotic Technology will play a key role as enabler and major benefit of the new Vision… 2 The Vision for Space Exploration - National Benefits Key Role of Innovation and Technology… • Background – “…U.S. achievements in space…have led to the development of technologies that have widespread applications to address problems on Earth… – “In preparation for future human exploration, we must advance our ability to live and work safely in space and, at the same time develop the technologies to extend humanity’s reach to the Moon, Mars and beyond. The new technologies required for further space exploration also will improve the Nation’s other space activities and may provide applications that could be used to address problems on Earth. • Policy Objective (Technology) – “Develop the innovative technologies, knowledge, and infrastructures both to explore and to support decisions about the destinations for human exploration… • National Benefits (Technology) – “Preparing for exploration and research accelerates the development of technologies that are important to the economy and national security.
    [Show full text]
  • Centennial Challenges Program
    Centennial Challenges Program Project Manager(s)/Lead(s) Sam Ortega/ZP30 (256) 544–9294 Eric Eberly/ZP30 (256) 544–2092 Sponsoring Program(s) Centennial Challenges Program Space Technology Mission Directorate Project Description NASA’s Centennial Challenges Program was initiated in 2005 to directly engage the public in the process of advanced technology development. The program offers The core of Centennial Challenges: opportunity, incentive prizes to generate revolutionary solutions to innovation, and communication. problems of interest to NASA and the nation. The pro- gram seeks innovations from diverse and nontraditional sources. Competitors are not supported by government funding and awards are only made to successful teams when the challenges are met. In keeping with the spirit of the Wright Brothers and other American innovators, the Centennial Challenge prizes are offered to independent inventors including small businesses, student groups, and individuals. These independent inventors are sought to generate innovative solutions for technical problems of interest to NASA and the nation and to provide them with the opportunity to stimulate or create new business ventures. The West Virginia University Mountaineers took home a Level 1 prize for $5,000 at the 2014 Sample Return Robot Challenge. They and one other team have also earned the right to attempt Level 2 at the 2015 event, with a potential prize purse of $1.5 million. 74 for the remaining prize money in 2015. The challenge will be competed again in June 2015. Also this year, two new challenges were announced and opened for registration. The Mars Ascent Vehicle (MAV) Challenge <www.nasa.gov/mavprize> is help- ing to advance the technology to return samples from a planetary surface.
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Centennial Challenge for 3D Printed Habitat
    AIAA SPACE Conference 2018 Tracie Prater, Ph.D. NASA’s Centennial Challenge Materials Engineer, NASA MSFC for 3D Printed Habitat Monsi Roman Centennial Challenges Program Manager, NASA MSFC Tony Kim Centennial Challenges Deputy .Program Manger, NASA MFSC Phase II Outcomes and Phase III Rob Mueller Competition Overview Senior Technologist, SwampWorks, NASA KSC Competition Vision • Advance the automated manufacturing and materials technologies needed for fabrication of habitats on a planetary surface using indigenous materials and mission recyclables • Terrestrially, these technologies stand to revolutionize the construction industry by automating labor intensive processes and enabling rapid fabrication of large scale structures • World’s population will increase from 6.6 billion to 12.9 billion by 2100 • Requires aggressive construction practices to satisfy increased demand for housing 3D Printing for Construction • 3D Printing (or Additive Manufacturing) is the process of constructing a 3D object by depositing material layer by layer based on a digital part file • Advantages of 3D printing for construction: • Removes design constraints (“manufacturing for design”) • Enables building and testing earlier in project lifecycle • Ability to work with new material formulations • Maximize use of in situ resources (planetary surface 3D printed concrete castle. Image from Popular Science. 3 General overview of processes and printing systems Examples of common printing processes for construction: 1. Cement-based materials extruded through a nozzle • Process used by NASA/Army Corps of Engineers/Contour Crafting in the Additive Construction for Mobile Emplacement project 2. Forced extrusion of wire filament Additive Construction for Mobile • Process used by many desktop printers Emplacement (ACME) In general, printing systems take the form of: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Today's Space Elevator
    International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2019-1 Today's Space Elevator Space Elevator Matures into the Galactic Harbour A Primer for Progress in Space Elevator Development Peter Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald ii Today's Space Elevator Space Elevator Matures into the Galactic Harbour Peter Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald Prepared for the International Space Elevator Consortium Chief Architect's Office Sept 2019 iii iv Today's Space Elevator Copyright © 2019 by: Peter Swan Michael Fitzgerald International Space Elevator Consortium All rights reserved, including the rights to reproduce this manuscript or portions thereof in any form. Published by Lulu.com [email protected] 978-0-359-93496-6 Cover Illustrations: Front – with permission of Galactic Harbour Association. Back – with permission of Michael Fitzgerald. Printed in the United States of America v vi Preface The Space Elevator is a Catalyst for Change! There was a moment in time that I realized the baton had changed hands - across three generations. I was talking within a small but enthusiastic group of attendees at the International Space Development Conference in June 2019. On that stage there was generation "co-inventor" Jerome Pearson, generation "advancing concept" Michael Fitzgerald and generation "excited students" James Torla and Souvik Mukherjee. The "moment" was more than an assembly of young and old. It was also a portrait of the stewards of the Space Elevator revolution -- from Inventor to Developer to Innovators. James was working a college research project on how to get to Mars in 77 days from the Apex Anchor and Souvik (16 years old) was representing his high school from India.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Center Houston and Ninesigma Invite People to Help Shape the Future of Deep Space Exploration $1 Million NASA Space Robotics Centennial Challenge Begins Today
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Space Center Houston and NineSigma Invite People to Help Shape the Future of Deep Space Exploration $1 Million NASA Space Robotics Centennial Challenge Begins Today Houston, TX — August 17, 2016 —Building homes on Mars and interplanetary travel are no longer the stuff of science fiction; the latest achievements in robotics are putting these dreams within our reach. Today, the science and space learning center Space Center Houston, innovation firm NineSigma and NASA’s Centennial Challenges Program announced the launch of the Space Robotics Challenge. The $1 million challenge will help further space exploration while inspiring the next generation of scientists. The Space Robotics Challenge is part of the NASA Centennial Challenges Program, which was created to further NASA’s journey to Mars while helping America maintain its technology leadership. It focuses on developing software to increase the autonomy of dexterous mobile robots, including NASA’s humanoid Robonaut 5 (also known as Valkyrie), either in transit or on other planets. Competitors will be challenged to program R5 to perform “representative tasks” such as exiting a habitat airlock hatch, using a ladder to reach the surface, repairing a tire on a planetary rover and removing a power cable from storage and attaching it to a far-away connector, all while crossing irregular terrain. “The Space Robotics Challenge will engage all generations through innovative robotic design,” said Space Center Houston’s President and CEO William T. Harris. “As the need for advanced technology continues to grow, this challenge will expand the global effort to accelerate our robotic capabilities for space exploration.” Registration for the Space Robotics Challenge begins today, with a qualifying round running from mid-September to mid-November.
    [Show full text]
  • Implementation of Federal Prize Authority: Progress Report
    Implementation of Federal Prize Authority: Progress Report A Report from the Office of Science and Technology Policy In Response to the Requirements of the America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010 March 2012 ABOUT THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY The Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) advises the President on the effects of science and technology on domestic and international affairs. The office serves as a source of scientific and technological analysis and judgment for the President with respect to major policies, plans, and programs of the Federal government. OSTP leads an interagency effort to develop and implement sound science and technology policies and budgets. The office works with the private sector to ensure Federal investments in science and technology contribute to economic prosperity, environmental quality, and national security. For more information, visit http://www.ostp.gov. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION This document is a work of the U.S. Government and is in the public domain (see 17 U.S.C. 105). DEPARTMENT, AGENCY, OFFICE, AND DIVISION ABBREVIATIONS BLS Bureau of Labor Statistics (part of DOL) CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (part of HHS) DCCPS NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences (part of HHS) DOD Department of Defense DOE Department of Energy DOL Department of Labor GSA General Services Administration HHS Department of Health and Human Services NASA National Aeronautics and Space Administration NCI National Cancer Institute (part of HHS) NIH National Institutes
    [Show full text]
  • Today's Space Elevator Assured Survivability Approach for Space Debris
    International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-1 Today's Space Elevator Assured Survivability Approach for Space Debris A Primer for Progress in Space Elevator Development Note: each debris white dot not to scale Peter Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald Cathy Swan, Ph.D. Today's Space Elevator Assured Survivability Approach for Space Debris Peter Swan, Ph.D. Michael Fitzgerald Cathy Swan, Ph.D. Prepared for the International Space Elevator Consortium Chief Architect's Office March 2020 International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-1 ii International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-1 Today's Space Elevator Assured Survivability Approach for Space Debris Copyright © 2020 by: Peter Swan Michael Fitzgerald International Space Elevator Consortium All rights reserved, including the rights to reproduce this manuscript or portions thereof in any form. Published by Lulu.com [email protected] 978-1-67818-191-8 Cover Illustrations: Front – Image from NASA Orbital Debris Office https://orbitaldebris.jsc.nasa.gov/images/beehives/leo1280.jpg Printed in the United States of America iii International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-1 iv International Space Elevator Consortium ISEC Position Paper # 2020-1 Preface The Space Elevator is a Catalyst for Change! Space debris is expected to be a part of space operations for most of this century. The real mitigation approach is the establishment of policy and actions that will prevent, and extensively reduce, creation of debris in the first place. The Space Elevator must become a catalyst to instigate more aggressive and active removal and mitigation of space debris. This position paper is the International Space Elevator Consortium's (ISEC) attempt to document an approach to mitigate the Space Elevator mission impact and identify safety issues when space debris threatens Space Elevator tethers.
    [Show full text]
  • 618475269-MIT.Pdf
    A Technoregulatory Analysis of Government Regulation and Oversight in the United States for the Protection of Passenger Safety in Commercial Human Spaceflight by Michael Elliot Leybovich B.S. Engineering Physics University of California at Berkeley, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Engineering Systems Division in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology February 2009 © 2009 Massachusetts Institute of Technology. All rights reserved. Signature of author: Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics Technology and Policy Program December 22, 2008 Certified by: Professor David A. Mindell Professor of Engineering Systems & Dibner Professor of the History of Engineering and Manufacturing Thesis Supervisor Certified by: Professor Dava J. Newman Professor of Aeronautics and Astronautics & Engineering Systems, MacVicar Faculty Fellow Thesis Supervisor Accepted by: Professor Dava J. Newman Director of Technology and Policy Program Accepted by Professor David L. Darmofal Chair, Committee on Graduate Students, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics 2 A Technoregulatory Analysis of Government Regulation and Oversight in the United States for the Protection of Passenger Safety in Commercial Human Spaceflight by Michael Elliot Leybovich B.S. Engineering Physics University of California at Berkeley, 2005 Submitted to the Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics and the Engineering Systems Division on December 22, 2008 in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degrees of Master of Science in Aeronautics and Astronautics and Master of Science in Technology and Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology ABSTRACT Commercial human spaceflight looks ready to take off as an industry, with ―space tourism‖ as its first application.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology Innovation V.16.03
    National Aeronautics and Space Administration PUBLICATION FOR BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY V.16.03 A Message from the Associate Administrator of the Space Technology Mission Directorate Dear Colleagues, For much of its history, NASA has been engaged in the study and development of robots to enhance the Nation’s exploration endeavors. NASA robotic systems serve a variety of functions and seek to enable many different kinds of missions in space. Robotic arms on spacecraft are used to move very large objects in space. The European Space Agency’s Rosetta probe recently landed on a comet, illustrating how robotic spacecraft can extend our reach and enable us to visit other worlds, planets, or celestial bodies. Rovers explore the surface of Mars and send data back to Earth, facilitating study of the Red Planet’s habitability. Remotely piloted robotic airplanes, like the Ikhana unmanned aircraft system, which captured live video feed of the descent of the Orion Exploration Flight Test 1 in early December 2014, can fly without a pilot on board. On Earth and in space, NASA is developing, testing, and flying transformative capabil- ities and cutting-edge technologies for a new future of collaborative human and robotic exploration. In this issue, we’ve highlighted technologies on board the International Space Station, which provides the astronauts with an ideal test bed for experimentation. We’ve also featured our continued development of the robotic Exoskeleton, a machine with applications for astronauts working on the surface of distant destinations as well as potential for helping with the physical rehabilitation of people here on our home planet.
    [Show full text]