The great schism 1054 pdf

Continue Exploring the objective identification of the effects of the East-West split of key points at the turn of the millennium, the Eastern and Western has gradually divided along the religious fault line over the centuries. The division in the Roman world can be marked by the construction of the New of Constantine the Great in Byzantia. The Byzantine iconoclasm, in particular, widened the growing divergence and tension between East and West - the Western Church still strongly supports the use of religious images, although the church at that time was still unified. In response, the in the west proclaimed a new emperor in Charles the Great, solidifying the schism and causing outrage in the east. The Empire in the West became known as the Holy Roman Empire. Finally, 1054 AD saw the East-Western schism: the official declaration of the institutional division between the east, the Orthodox Church (now the Eastern Orthodox Church), and the west, in the (now the Roman Catholic Church). The official institutional division in 1054 AD between the Eastern Church of the (in the Orthodox Church, now called the Eastern Orthodox Church) and the Western Church of the Holy Roman Empire (in the Catholic Church, now called the Roman Catholic Church). Iconoclasm Destruction or prohibition of religious icons and other images or monuments for religious or political reasons. The East-West divide, also called the Great Divide and The Divide of 1054, was a disconnect between what is now the Eastern Orthodox and Catholic churches, which has lasted since the 11th century. Church differences and theological disputes between the Greek East and the Latin West before there was a formal gap that occurred in 1054. Among them were questions of the source of the , whether bread should be used in the , the of Rome claims universal jurisdiction, as well as the place of the Constantinople throne in relation to the Pentarchies. Tensions between East and West At the turn of the millennium, the Eastern and Western Roman Empires gradually separated along religious fault lines for centuries, beginning with the fact that Emperor Leo III in 730 AD became a pioneer of the Byzantine iconoclasm empire, in which he declared the worship of religious images of the Etency. The Western Church remains strongly supportive of the use of religious images. Leo tried to use military force to force Pope Gregory III, but he failed, and the pope condemned the actions of Leo. In response, Leo confiscated the papal estates and placed them under the control of Constantinople. Thus, the Iconoborcism widened the growing divergence and tension between east and west, although the church was still unified at that time. He also decisively ended the so- called Byzantine papacy, under which, with правления Justinian I I I the were previously appointed or approved by the emperor in Constantinople. The Western Church's respect for Constantinople has disintegrated, and Rome will maintain a consistent iconodule position (meaning it supports either in favor of religious images or icons and their veneration). The new emperor in the West Regent Irene convened the Second Council of Nicae in 787 AD, which temporarily restored the worship of the image, in an attempt to calm the strained relations between Constantinople and Rome, but it was too late. After Charlemagne, the King of the Franks, saved Rome from a pawnshop attack, Pope Leo III (not to be confused with the Byzantine Lion III) declared him the new Roman emperor in 800 AD, as a woman (Irene) could not be emperor. It was also a message that the popes were now loyal to the Franks who could protect them, rather than the Byzantines who only caused problems. For the Byzantines, it was an outrage, attacking their claim that they were the true successors of Rome. From that moment on, the Frankish Empire is commonly known as the Holy Roman Empire. With two Roman empires, the Byzantines and the Franks, the power of the Byzantine Empire was weakened. In the west they were no longer called Romans but Greeks (and, after all, Byzantines). The Byzantines, however, continued to consider themselves Romans and looked at the Constantinople patriarch rather than the pope as the most important religious figure in the church. The crisis and the constant split Differences in practice and worship between the Roman Church in the west and the Constantinople Church in the east only intensified over time. In 1053, the first step in the process that led to a formal split was taken; Ecumenical Patriarch Michael I of Constantinople ordered the closure of all Latin churches in Constantinople in response to the fact that Greek churches in southern Italy were forced to either close or conform to Latin practices. According to historian I.B. Bury, Serularius's goal in closing Latin churches was to cut off any attempts at reconciliation. Finally, in 1054 AD, relations between Eastern and Western traditions in the Christian church reached an incurable crisis. The papal lebat, sent by Leo IX, went to Constantinople with goals that included the rejection of the title of Ecumenical Patriarch by Serularia and insisting that he recognize the Pope's assertion that he is the head of all churches. The main purpose of the papal doping was to seek help from the Byzantine emperor in connection with the Norman conquest of southern Italy, as well as to deal with the recent attacks of Leo Ohridsky against the use of unscreate bread and other Western customs, attacks that had the support of Cerularius. Historian Axel Bayer claims the flight was sent in response to two letters, one from the emperor seeking in organizing a common military campaign of the Eastern and Western Empires against the Normans, and another from Cerularius. On the refusal of Cerularius to accept the requirement, the leader of the legation, Cardinal Humbert Silva Candida, excommunicated him, and in the return of Cerularius excommunicated Humbert and other legates. It was only the first act in a centuries-old process that eventually became a complete split. The gradual separation of the last few centuries ended with the official declaration of institutional separation between the east, the Orthodox Church (now the Eastern Orthodox Church) and the Western Catholic Church (now the Roman Catholic Church). This was known as the East West split. The split between East and West. Religious distribution after the East-West split between the churches of the Byzantine Empire and the Holy Roman Empire in 1054 AD, the Church split along doctrinal, theological, linguistic, political and geographical lines, and the fundamental violation was never healed, with each side sometimes accusing the other of entering the heresy and initiating division. Conflicts over the next few centuries (such as the Crusades, the Latin Massacre in 1182 AD, the West's retribution for the plundering of Fesalonica in 1185 AD, the capture and sack of Constantinople in 1204 AD, and the introduction of Latin patriarchs) are only a great reconciliation. For other schisms between the Roman Church and the Church of Constantinople, see the Rome-Constantinople schism (disambigation). For the Western schism 1378-1417, which is sometimes also called large schism, sees a western split. The disconnect between the Catholic and Eastern Orthodox churches East-West split22 January-July 1054Which known asReitian split,Split 1054Texristian splitCausological and liturgical sporesPartipopte Leo IX Ecumenical Patriarch Michael I CerulariusOutcomePermanent split two churches on the modern Catholic Church and Eastern Orthodox Church Part of the series about Christianity of JesusChrist of the Nativity of the Crucifixion of the Resurrection Resurrection Resurrection Of The Bible Adouts of the Old Testament of the New Testament Gospel Of the Book of the Bible Church Creed of the New Testament of the God of Trinity Father of the Holy Spirit Apologetics Epiphany Christology History the theology of theology of the Early Christianity Fathers of the Church Constantine Councils Augustine East-West split the Crusades of the Aquinas Reformation luther DenominationGroup of the West Roman Catholic Protestant Adventist Anbaptist Anglican Evangelical Evangelical Holiness of the Lutheran Methodist Pentecostals of the Eastern Eastern Catholic Orthodox Orthodox Church of the East (Nestorian) The Other Religion Prayer Preaching Symbolism of Christianity portalvte East-West split (also the Great Divide or Split 1054) is the rupture of communication with the 11th century between the Catholic Church and the Eastern Orthodox Church. The split was the culmination of the theological and political divisions that had developed in previous centuries between Eastern and Western Christianity. A series of ecclesiastical disagreements and theological disputes between the Greek East and the Latin West before the official split, which occurred in 1054. Among them were issues of the holy spirit's procession, whether it was fringed or unspecified bread to be used in the Eucharist, as well as the Bishop of Rome's claim to universal jurisdiction, as well as the place of the Constantinople throne in connection with the pentarchy. In 1053, the first step in the process that led to a formal split was taken: Greek churches in southern Italy were forced to conform to Latin practices, and if one of them did not, they were forced to close. In retaliation, ecumenical Patriarch Michael I of Constantinople ordered the closure of all Latin churches in Constantinople. In 1054, the papal lebate, sent by Leo IX, went to Constantinople with goals that included denying Serularia the title of Ecumenical Patriarch and insisting that he recognize that the pope is the head of all churches. The main objectives of the papal doping were to seek help from the Byzantine emperor in connection with the Norman conquest of southern Italy and to cope with the recent attacks by Leo Ohridsky against the use of unscreate bread and other Western customs that had the support of Cerularius. Historian Axel Bayer says the presidency was sent in response to two letters, one from the emperor asking for help in organizing a general military campaign of the Eastern and Western empires against the Normans and the other from Cerularius. On the failure of Cerularius to accept the requirement, the leader of the legation, Cardinal Humbert Silva Candida, O.S.B., excommunicated him, and in the return Cerularius excommunicated Humbert and other legates. The veracity of the act of Western legates is questionable, because the Pope Leo died, and the excommunication of Serularia was applied only to the legates personally. However, the Church split along doctrinal, theological, linguistic, political and geographical lines, and the fundamental violation was never healed, and each side sometimes accused the other of entering into a heresy and initiating division. Latin Crusades, the Latin Massacre in 1182, the West's retribution in the plundering of Thessaloniks in 1185, the capture and looting of Constantinople during the Fourth Crusade in 1204, and the introduction of Latin patriarchs made reconciliation more The establishment of Latin hierarchies in the Crusader states meant that there were two competing contenders for each of the patriarchal skinny Antioch, Constantinople and Jerusalem, making the existence of the schism clear. Several attempts at reconciliation will not bear fruit. In 1965, Pope Paul VI and Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagor I of Constantinople annulled the anathema of 1054, although this annulment of the measures taken against several persons was essentially a gesture of goodwill and did not constitute any reunification. The lack of complete communication between churches is even explicitly mentioned when the Code of Canon Law grants Catholic priests permission to administer the ordinances of repentance, the Eucharist and the anointing of the sick by spontaneously requesting members of Eastern churches such as the Eastern Orthodox Church (as well as Eastern Orthodox Churches and the Church of the East) and members of Western churches such as the Old Catholic Church. Contacts between the two sides continue every year when each of them joins the celebration of the patron saint, Saints Peter and Paul (June 29) for Rome and St. Andrew (November 30) for Constantinople, and there were several visits of the head of each to the other. The efforts of the Ecumenical Patriarchs to reconcile with the Catholic Church are often the subject of sharp criticism from some Orthodox. Differences, underlying the split Part of the series on the history of The Christian Theology Von Theology Early Christianity Timeline (en) The Church statehood Trinitharianism Netrinitarianism Restorationism Christology Mariology Biblical canon Deuterokanonic books Of and Tolerance Ecumenical Creed of the Apostles Nikn Chalkedonian Afanas Nikaea Ephesus Chalcedon Post-Nice Development of Heresi (en) Monophysitism Monothelytic Iconoborcism Gregory I Alckin Photios Schisism between East and West Scholastic Aquinas anselm Reformation Palamas Luther (Martin Luther Theology) Melanchton Indulgence 95 Mye Book of Concord Predestination Calvinism Arminism English Reformation Counter-Reformation Trent After the Reformation of Pietism (en) John Wesley (en) The Great Awakenings Movement of the Holiness Restoration Movement Existentialism Liberalism (Secular Theology Modernism in the Catholic Church) Nouvel-theology Post-Liberal Theology Postmodernism (Radical Orthodoxy) Neo-Orthodoxy Of Paleo-Orthodoxy Vatican II Hermeneutics Theology liberation Christian Christian feminism (Asian Theology) Theoristics Progressive Christianity Theotanathology Critical Realism Consequentialism (Situational Ethics christian Hedonism) Transmodernism Process theology Open portal of Christianity Jaroslav Pelican emphasizes that while the schism between East and West stemmed mainly from political and ecclesiastical differences, this discord also reflected the main theological differences. Pelican further argues that antagonists in the 11th century inappropriately exaggerated their theological differences, while modern historians tend to minimize them. Pelican argues that the documents of that era testify to the depths of intellectual alienation that have developed between the two sections of the Christian world. Although both sides were technically more guilty of the split than they were, they often accused each other of blasphemy. Pelican describes much of the dispute as dealing with regional differences in customs and customs, some of which were adiaphores (i.e. neither correct nor wrong). However, he goes on to say that, while it was in principle easy to accept the existence of the adiafore, in practice it was difficult to distinguish customs that were harmlessly adiophores from those with doctrinal effects. Ecclesiological controversy See also: Ecclesiology Philip Sherrard, an Orthodox theologian, argues that the main reason for the east-West schism was and remains a clash of these two fundamentally irreconcilable ecclesiastical ecclesiastical sciences. Roger Haight describes the issue of episcopal power in the Church as acute and the relative situation of Rome and Constantinople is a recurring source of tension. Haight characterizes the difference in ecclesiology as the contrast between a pope with universal jurisdiction and a combination of a patriarchal superstructure with an episcopal and synodal ecclesiology of communication similar to that found in Cyprian. However, Nikolai Afanasiev criticized both the Catholic and Orthodox churches for subscription to the universal ecclesiology of St. Cyprian Carthage, according to which there can only be one true and universal church. Another point of contention was celibacy among Western priests (both monastic and parochial), as opposed to the Eastern discipline under which parish priests could be married to men. However, the Latin church has always had priests who were legally married. They have been a small minority since the 12th century. Ecclesiological structure See also: The primacy of the Roman pontiff and the organization of the Eastern Orthodox Church There are several different ecclesiology: ecclesiology of communication, eucharistic ecclesiology, baptismal ecclesiology, trinitarian ecclesiology, kerigmatic theology. Other churchologies are hierarchical-institutional and organic-mystical, Eastern churches adhered to the idea that each local church town with its bishop, presbytery, deacons and people celebrating the Eucharist is the entire church. From this point of view is called eucharistic ecclesiology (or more recently holographic ecclesiology), each bishop is the successor to St. Peter in his church (Church), and churches form what Eusebius called the common union of churches. This implied that all were ontologically equal, although functionally specific bishops could be granted special privileges by other bishops and serve as metropolitans, archbishops or patriarchs. In the Roman Empire, from the time of Constantine to the fall of the empire in 1453, universal ecclesiology, not eucharistic, became an operational principle. The prevailing view was that when the Roman Empire became Christian, a perfect world order was achieved, triumphing god: one universal empire was sovereign and coterminous with it was one universal church. Early on, the ecclesiology of the Roman Church was universal, with the idea that the Church was a world-wide organism with a divinely (not functionally) designated center: the Church/Bishop of Rome. These two views are still present in modern Eastern Orthodoxy and Catholicism and can be seen as the fundamental causes of the split and great division between East and West. The Orthodox Church does not accept the doctrine of papal power set out in the Vatican Cathedral of 1870, and is taught today in the Catholic Church. The Orthodox Church has always maintained the original position of collegiality of bishops, as a result of which the structure of the church was closer to the confederacy. Orthodox have synods where the highest authorities in each church community unite, but unlike the Catholic Church, no central person or figure has an absolute and infallible last word about church teaching. In practice, this has sometimes led to a split between the Greek, Russian, Bulgarian and Ukrainian Orthodox churches, as no central authority can act as an arbiter of various internal disputes. Since the second half of the 20th century, eucharistic ecclesiology has been supported by Catholic theologians. Henri de Lubak writes: The Church, like the Eucharist, is a secret of unity - the same mystery, and with inexhaustible wealth. Both bodies of Christ are the same body. Joseph Ratzinger calls eucharistic ecclesiology the true core of the teachings of Vatican II (Second Vatican) on the cross. According to Ratzinger, one church of God is not possible if not in different separate local congregations. In them, the Eucharist is celebrated in alliance with the Church everywhere. Eucharistic ecclesiology led the council to confirm the theological significance of the local church. If every holiday of the Eucharist not only Christ's sacramental presence on the altar, but also his church presence in the assembled community, then each local Eucharistic church should be more than a subset of the universal church; it must be Christ's body in that place. The ecclesiological aspect of the east-West schism revolves around the authority of bishops in their dioceses and the line of power between bishops of different dioceses. Catholics usually insist on the primacy of Roman and papal power, based on patrist labors and conciliatory documents. Papal Privilege and Power See also: Pseudo-Isidore and The Donation of Constantine The current official teaching of the Catholic Church on papal privileges and power, which are unacceptable to the Eastern Orthodox churches are the toe of the Pope's infallibility when he officially speaks from Chairman Peter (ex cathedra Petri) on matters of faith and morality to be held by the entire Church, so that such definitions are irreparable in themselves, not by the consent of the Church (ex sese et non-ex consensu ecclesiae) and have a binding character for all (Catholic) the Pope's direct episcopal jurisdiction over all (Catholic) Christians in the world; the authority of the Pope to appoint (and also overthrow) (quoting is necessary) the bishops of all (Catholic) Christian churches, except the territory of the patriarchy; and the assertion that the legitimacy and authority of all (Catholic) Christian bishops in the world stems from their alliance with the Roman throne and its bishop, the Supreme Pontiff, the unique successor of Peter and vicar of Christ on earth. The main among the church issues that divide the two churches is the importance of papal primacy in any future unified church. Orthodox insistence that this should be a primacy of honor as in an ancient church, not a primacy of power, while Catholics see the pontiff's role as a necessary authority and authority, the exact form of which is open to discussion with other Christians. According to the Orthodox faith, the test of Catholicism is the observance of the power of Scripture and then the Sacred Tradition of the Church. This is not determined by joining any particular see. The position of the Orthodox Church is that it has never recognized the Pope de jure as the leader of the entire church. Referring to Ignatius of Antioch, Carlton says: Contrary to popular belief, the word Catholic does not mean universal; it means all full, nothing is missing. ... Thus, to recognize the Catholic Church means to say that It possesses the fullness of the Christian faith. To say, however, that the Orthodox and Rome make up the two lungs of the same Church is to deny that any Church is Catholic in any meaningful sense of the term. not only contradicts the teachings of Orthodoxy, it categorically contradicts the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church, which considered itself truly Catholic - Carlton 2007, page 22 The Church is in the image of the Trinity and reflects the reality of incarnation. Christ's body must always be equal to itself... According to the local church, which manifests the body of Christ, can not be included in any larger organization or collective, which makes it more Catholic and more in unity, for the simple reason that the principle of total Catholicism and total unity is already inherent to it.- Sherrard 1996, p. 15 Theological Issues Main Articles: Eastern Orthodox - Roman Catholic Theological Difference and Contra Mistakes Graecorum Iconorcion Policy, applied by a number of decrees of Emperor Leo III of Isaurian in 726-729 resisted the West that gave rise to friction that ended in 787, when the Second Council of Nicae confirmed that the images should be revered, but not worshipped. Libri Carolini, commissioned by Charlemagne, criticized what the faulty translation gave as a council decision, but their objections were refuted by Pope Adrian I. From the Catholic Church's point of view, ecclesiological issues are central issues, so they characterize the split between the two churches as a schism. In their opinion, the Orthodox are very close to them in theology, and the Catholic Church does not consider Orthodox beliefs hereterical. However, from the point of view of Orthodox theologians, there are theological issues that work much deeper than just theology around the primacy of the Pope. In fact, unlike Catholics, who do not consider Orthodox heretical at all and speak instead of the Eastern split, some prominent Orthodox theologians consider the Catholic Church heretical on fundamental doctrinal issues of theology, such as philicoc. These questions have a long history, as can be seen in the works of the Orthodox theologian and St. Nikita Stitatos. In the Catholic Church, too, you can find some writers who pejoratively talk about the Eastern Orthodox Church and its theology, but these writers are marginalized. The official view of the Catholic Church is that expressed in the decree Unitatis redintegratio of the Vatican II: In the study of revelations East and West followed different methods, and differently developed their understanding and confession of God's truth. It is not surprising, therefore, that one tradition from time to time approaches a full assessment of some aspects of the mystery of revelation than another, or expresses it for better benefit. In such cases, these different theological expressions should often be seen as complementary rather than contradictory. Where are the true theological traditions The Church is concerned, we must recognize how wonderfully they have their roots in the Holy Scriptures, and how they are brought up and expressed in the life of the liturgy. They also draw their strength from the living tradition of the apostles and from the works of fathers and spiritual writers of the Eastern Churches. Thus, they contribute to the correct ordering of Christian life and, in fact, pave the way for a complete vision of Christian truth. Trinity See also: Philioc Although Western churches do not consider the Eastern and Western understanding of the Trinity radically different, Eastern theologians such as John Romanides and Michael Pomasky argue that the position of Philioc is a symptom of a fatal lack of Western understanding, which they attribute to Augustine's influence and, as a rule, to the influence of Fama Aquina. Filioc, Latin for and (from) the Son was added in Western Christianity to the Latin text of the Nice-Constantinopolitan Credo, which is also different from the original Greek text in the Πιστεύω to have the additional phrase Deum de Deo (God from God) and in the use of the only I Πιστεύομεν believe (Latin, which preserves Eastern Orthodoxy. , with neither Eastern Orthodoxy, uses We Believe. Philioc argues that the Holy Spirit comes from the Son, as well as from the Father, a doctrine adopted by the Catholic Church, and by Protestant churches in general. Christians of these groups usually include it during the recitation of the Nice Creed. However, these groups recognize that Philioc is not part of the original text established at the First Constantinople Council in 381, and they do not require others to use it, too, when talking about Creed. Indeed, the Catholic Church does not add a phrase corresponding to Philioc (καὶ τοῦ Υἱοῦ) to the Greek text of Creed, even in the liturgy for Catholics of the Latin rite. At the Cathedral of Constantinople in 879-880, the Eastern Orthodox Church anathema to the Philoque phrase as a novelty and a learning creed, and in its 1848 encyclical, the Eastern Patriarchates referred to it as heretics. He was qualified as such by some saints of the Eastern Orthodox Church, including Photios I of Constantinople, Mark Ephesus and Gregory Palamas, who were called the Three Pillars of Orthodoxy. The Eastern Church believes the western church is sticking Filioque unilaterally (without advising or holding the council with the east) in the creed that the western church broke communion with the east. Orthodox theologians such as Vladimir Lossky criticize the focus of God's Western theology in an unsouthed entity as erroneous, which he claims is a modalistic and therefore speculative expression of God, which indicates the Sabellay era. The Orthodox theologian Michael Pomazansky argues that in order for the Holy Spirit to come from the Father and the Son in Creed, there must be two sources in the deity (double procession), while in one God there can be only one source of divinity, which is the hypostasis of the Father of the Trinity, not the essence of God as such. Bishop Callistos Ware suggests that the problem is more in the field of semantics than in the basic doctrinal differences: The Philioc controversy that has separated us over the centuries is more than just a formality, but it is not insoluble. By qualifying the firm position adopted when I wrote the Orthodox Church twenty years ago, I now believe, after further study, that the problem is more in the field of semantics than in any major doctrinal differences. - Bishop Callistas Ware, Diaconia, zogbi 1992, page 43 Experience of God against Scholasticism Additional information: Heshihasm Lossky argues that the difference in the East and the West is due to the Catholic Church's use of pagan metaphysical philosophy (and scholasticism), rather than the actual experience of God, called theory, to test theological pregum Catholic Christianity. For this reason, Lossky claims that Orthodox and Catholics have become different people. Other Eastern Orthodox theologians, such as the Romanids and Metropolitan Naftos Hierotheos, made similar statements. According to Orthodox teachings, aoria can be achieved through ascetic practices such as hesichazm, which was condemned as a erazam seminar. Orthodox theologians believe that, unlike Orthodox theology, Western theology is based on a philosophical discourse that reduces humanity and nature to cold mechanical concepts. Roman Catholicism rationalizes even the mystery of the Eucharist: it interprets spiritual action as purely material and demeans the to such an extent that it becomes, in his opinion, a kind of atomic miracle. The Orthodox Church does not have a metaphysical theory of Transsubstentia, and such a theory is unnecessary. Christ is the Lord of the elements, and it is in his power to make every thing without changing its physical substance become His Body. The body of Christ in the Eucharist is not physical flesh.- Los 1969, p. 87 Orthodox theologians argue that the mind (mind, rationality) is the focus of Western theology, while in Eastern theology the mind must be placed in the heart, so they are united in what is called nous, this unity as the heart is the focus of Eastern Orthodoxy. In Orthodox theology, in Eastern ascetic traditions the purpose of ascetic practice is to gain sobriety consciousness, wakefulness (nepsa). For mankind, this is achieved in the healing of all man, called soul or heart. When a person's heart reconciles with their mind, it is called the healing of the nous or the eye, the focus of the heart or soul. Part of this process is healing and reconciling the mind of mankind, called logos or dianoia with a heart or soul. While the spirit and body of mankind are energies revitalized by the soul, Orthodoxy teaches man sin, suffering and sorrow caused by the fact that his heart and mind are ambivalent and conflicted. According to Orthodox theology, the lack of any understanding (disease) can be neither bypassed nor satisfied with rational or discursive thought (i.e. systematization), and the denial of the needs of the human heart (the more Western expression would be the needs of the soul) causes various negative or destructive manifestations such as addiction, atheism and evil thoughts, etc., healed or restored nous creates a state of sobriety or nepsis of the mind. Uncreated Light Main article: Movement Kollyvades See also: Light Tabor and Nicholas Kabasilas Orthodox theologians argue that the theological division of East and West led to a direct theological conflict known as the Heshihazma controversy during several councils in Constantinople between 1341 and 1351. They argue that this polemics have highlighted a stark contrast between what is accepted by the Catholic Church as a correct (or Orthodox) theological dogma, and the way theology is tested and what is considered valid theology by the Eastern Orthodox. The essence of the disagreement is that in the East man cannot be a true theologian or teach the knowledge of God without experiencing God, as defined as the vision of God (theory). At the heart of this question was the doctrine of the differences of the Essence-Energy (which states that although creation may never know the unstory nature of God, it may know its unsalted energy) by Gregory Palamas. The original sin, free will and the immaculate conception of Augustine, the doctrine of original sin, the Orthodox do not accept Augustine's doctrine of original sin. His interpretation of the original sin is rejected in the East. Augustine's teachings are also not accepted in its totality in the West. The Catholic Church rejects tradicianism and affirms creationism. His doctrine of original sin is largely based, but not identical to, augustine's teachings, and opposes The interpretation of Augustine by Martin Luther and John Calvin. His teachings in some respects depart from the ideas of Augustine. The Eastern Church does not use Augustine at all. Another Orthodox opinion is expressed by Christos Jannaras, who described Augustine as the source of every distortion change in the truth of the Church in the West. The Orthodox doctrine of original sins What eastern Orthodox sins accept is that the original sin has spoiled their existence (their bodies and environment), in which each person is born, and thus we are born into a corrupted existence (the ancestral sin of Adam and Eve) and that the original sin is hereditary. It's not just Adam and Eve who are left. As life passes from them to all their descendants, so does the original sin. We all participate in original sin, because we are all descended from the same ancestor of Adam. The teaching of the Eastern Orthodox Church is that as a result of Adam's sin, hereditary sin has flowed into his offspring; so that everyone who is born after the flesh bears this burden and experiences the fruits of it in this real world. Similarly, the Catholic Church considers that the sin of Adam, which we inherit, and for remission, which is baptized even children who do not have a personal sin, is called sin only in a similar sense, because it is not an act committed as a personal sin of Adam and Eve, but a fallen state contract, devoid of the human nature of original holiness and justice. Both the East and the West believe that each person is not called to atone for the actual sin committed by Adam and Eve. According to the Western Church, original sin has no personal fault in any of Adam's descendants, and the Eastern Church teaches that by these fruits and by this burden, we do not understand sin. Orthodox and Catholics believe that people inherit only a spiritual disease (in which everyone suffers and sins) Adam and Eve, caused by the sin of their ancestors (what flowed to them), a disease that left them weakened in their abilities, prone to ignorance, suffering from the domination of death and prone to sin. The Immaculate Conception of the Catholic Doctrine of the Immaculate Conception, which claims that God protected the Virgin Mary from original sin without deserving of his own, was dogmatically defined by Pope Pius IX in 1854. Orthodox theology proclaims that Mary was chosen to carry Christ, for the first time find God's favor with her purity and obedience. Sin, Purgatory and Hell Purgatory Another point of theological discord between the western and eastern churches is the doctrine of purgatory (as shown in the Second Council of Lyon and the Council of Ferrara-Florence). It was developed in time in Western theology, according to which, all who die in God's grace and friendship, but are still imperfectly purified, are truly confident in their eternal salvation; but after death they are purified in order to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the heavenly joy. However, some eastern agreeing that there is a state beyond death in which believers continue to improve and have led to complete divination, believe that this state is not a punishment, but a growth. They believe that suffering cannot purify sin because they have a different view of sin and see suffering as the result of spiritual illness. Western theology usually sees sin not only as a disease that weakens and hinders, but also as something deserving of punishment. The Eastern Orthodox Church believes that there is a state after death where believers continue to improve and have led to complete divination. Although some Orthodox described the interim state as purgatory, others set it apart from aspects related to it in the West: at the Cathedral of Ferrara-Florence, the Orthodox bishop Mark Efes claimed that there were no purifying lights in it. The curse of the traditional Orthodox teaching is that those who reject Christ will be punished. According to Dosite's Confession, people immediately go to joy in Christ or to the torment of punishment. There is no place in Orthodox teaching without God. In eternity, there is no shelter from God. In Catholic theology, God is present everywhere not only by his strength, but also in himself. Hell is a state of self-selecting separation from God. Eastern theology considers the desire to sin as the result of a spiritual illness (caused by the pride of Adam and Eve), which must be cured. One such theologian gives his interpretation of Western theology as follows: According to the holy Fathers of the Church, there is no uncoated Paradise and created hell, as the Franco-Latin tradition teaches. The Eastern Church believes that hell or eternal curse and paradise exist and are the same place that is with God, and that the same divine love (God-created energy) that is a source of bliss and comfort for the righteous (because they love God, His love is heaven for them) is also a source of torment (or Lake of Fire) for sinners (because they do not love God) they will feel His love this way). The Western Church speaks of heaven and hell as a state of existence, not as places, while there is no hell per se in Eastern Orthodoxy, there is no curse or punishment in eternity for giving up God's grace. The control of the Byzantine Empire was a theocracy; the emperor was the supreme power both in the church and in the state. The king is not God among men, but the Viceroy of God. It is not the embodiment of logos, but is in particular respect with logos. He was specially appointed and constantly inspired by God, a friend of God, the interpreter of the Word of God. His eyes look up to receive God's messages. He must be surrounded by reverence glory, which befits the earthly copy of God; and he will frame his earthly government on the model of the divine original, finding power in his accordance with the monarchy of God. In the East, the approval of the caesarean section, the subordination of the church to the religious pretensions of the dominant political order, was most fully evident in the Byzantine Empire at the end of the first millennium, while in the West, where the decline of imperial power left the Church relatively independent, . As a result of the Muslim conquests of the territories of the patriarchy of Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem remained only two rival powerful centers of church power - Constantinople and Rome. Until that happened, Rome often tried to act as a neutral intermediary in disputes between the Eastern Patriarchates. In the Eastern Christian world, the doctrine of papal superiority is said to be based on pseudo-Isidore decrees, documents attributed to early popes but actually forged, probably in the second quarter of the 9th century, in order to protect the position of bishops from metropolitan and secular authorities. The Orthodox East disputes the teaching that Peter was the Patriarch of Rome, a title that the West also does not give him. Early sources, such as St. Irene, can be interpreted as describing Pope Linus as the first bishop of Rome and Pope Cletus ii. The Oxford Dictionary of Dads reads: At the end of the 2nd or early 3rd cent. tradition defined Peter as the first bishop of Rome. This was a natural development after the monarchical episcopate, i.e. the government of the local church by one bishop, unlike a group of Presbyterian bishops, finally appeared in Rome in the middle of the 2nd cent. An earlier tradition, however, that placed Peter and Paul in class separately, as the pioneers who together created the Roman church and its ministry, never lose sight. At some point, St. Peter, according to tradition, was the bishop of Antioch, and then he was replaced by Evodi and Ignatius. Eastern Orthodox do not have the primacy of the Pope over the Eastern Church; they teach that the Pope is the first among equals. The first seven Ecumenical Councils were held in the East and called by the Eastern Emperors, the Roman pontiffs never presided over any of them. Story Home article: The Story of the East-West Divide See also: The History of Christianity This section should include only a brief summary of the history of the East-West divide. See Wikipedia: Consolidated Style for information on how to properly include it in the main text of this article. (August 2016) Part of the series about the Eastern Orthodox ChurchMoshik Christ Pantocrator, Hagia Sofia Review Structure Of Theology (History of Theology) Liturgy Of the Church Holy Mysteries Kind of Rescue View of Mary View on the Icons of the Von Crucifixion / Resurrection of Jesus ChristianIty Christian Church Apostolic Succession Four Signs Of the Church of the Orthodox Organization of the Autocephalous Patriarchate Ecumenical Patriarchy Ecumenical Patriarch Bishop Bishop Bishop Bishops Priests Deacons monastics degree of Autocephalous jurisdictions Autocephalous jurisdictions Autocephalic churches, which are officially part of the sacrament America partially recognized the autocephaly of Constantinople, the Church of Greece and Alexandria. Ukraine Noncanonical Jurisdictions Old Believers Spiritual Christianity True Orthodoxy Catacomba Church Old calendars of the American Orthodox Catholic Church American World Patriarchs National: Abkhazia Belarus Belarus Italy Montenegro Montenegro Northern Macedonia Russian Orthodox Church in America Syncretic Eastern Orthodox Churches: Evangelical Orthodox Western Orthodox Celts Moscow Jerusalem History of the Church of the Fathers of the Pentarchi Byzantine Empire Christianization of the Bulgarian Christianization of the Great Split of the Soviet Empire's Kiev Rus North America Moscow-Constantinople split 15-16 c. 1996 2018 Theology History of Eastern Orthodox Theology (20th century (Neo-Palamism) Apophics. Hesihasm Holy Trinity Hypostatic Union Of Icons Metusiosis Mystical Theology Nicene Creedsis Nepsis Oikonomia vs Akribeia Ousia Palamism Philokalia Phronema Sinosis Theotokos Differences from the Catholic Church Opposition Philioc opposition to the papal supremacy of liturgy and the worship of the Divine Liturgy Divine Services Akatiti Euchologion Holy Water Iconostasis Jesus Prayer Kontakion Liturgical Entrances Liturgical Fans Of the Lithium Memorial Service of Remembrance eternal Omoforion Orthodox bowing Orthodox Marriage Praxis Paraklesis Easter Greeting EasterAl Homily Paschal Troparion Prayer rope Prosfor Russian bell ringing Semantron Sign of the Cross Sticheron Troparion Vestas Using the incense Liturg :Feast of Orthodoxy Theotokos Four Fast Periods: Christmas of the Great Lent of the Apostles Fast Assumption Fast protagonists Athanasius Alexandria Ephraim Syrian Basil Caesar Cyril of Jerusalem Gregory Nazianus Gregory Nissa John Chrysostom Cyril of Alexandria John Klimakus Gregory Palamas Other themes Architecture of the Encyclical of the Eastern Patriarchs Orthodox Cross of the Holy Title Statistics on the country Vte split between Western and Eastern Mediterranean Christians as a result of various political, cultural and theological factors that have occurred over the centuries. Historians view the mutual excommunication of 1054 as a terminal event. It is difficult to agree on the date of the beginning of the split. Perhaps it began at the moment when in the time of Victor Roman (about 180) there was a dispute about quartodieman. Orthodox apologists point to this incident as an example of Rome's claims to the papal primacy and its rejection by the Eastern Churches. Sporadic divisions in common unions took place under Pope Damas I in the 4th and 5th centuries. Disputes over theological and other issues led to a split between the Churches in Rome and Constantinople for 37 years from 482 to 519 (Acasian schism). Most sources agree that the east-West divide clearly manifests a Photian split of 863 to 867. Claims of the Throne of Rome While the church in Rome claimed special power over other churches, the tightening of documents of that era do not give any clear claims or recognition of the papal primacy. By the end of the 2nd century, Victor, the Bishop of Rome, had tried to resolve disputes about quartodeceman. The question was whether to celebrate Easter at the same time as the Jewish Pass, as Christians did in the Roman province of Asia, or wait until next Sunday, as announced by synods held in other eastern provinces such as Palestine and Pontus, the acts of which were still still in the time of Eusebius, and in Rome. The pope tried to reject churches in Asia that refused to accept the celebration on Sunday. Other bishops reproached him for doing so. Laurent Klinewerk commented: Victor apparently claimed the highest authority, probably from St. Peter, and decided - or at least tried to reject an entire group of Churches, because they followed a different tradition and refused to obey. Therefore, it can be argued that the Great Divide began with Victor, continued with Stefan and remained underground until the ninth century! But the question is, even if Victor didn't act wisely, didn't he have the power to cut off entire churches? This is what Catholics claim, with the conclusion that such excommunication would be ontologically meaningful and put someone outside the Catholic Church. However, we do not see the bishops call, but in fact sharply rebuke and admonish Victor. Ultimately, that's why his weaning letters didn't work. However, you can read in Eusebius's account the possibility that St. admitted that Victor could indeed cut off entire churches and that such excommunication would be ontologically significant. ... In the end, it took some patience and the Ecumenical Council to achieve what Victor failed to achieve with his threat of excommunication.- Despite Victor's inability to exercise his intention to delay Asian churches, many Catholic apologists point to this episode as evidence of papal primacy and authority in the early Church, citing the fact that none of the bishops challenged his right to excommunication from the Church. but instead questioned wisdom and mercy. The opinion of the Bishop of Rome was often sought, especially when the patriarchs of the Eastern Mediterranean were locked in a fractious dispute. However, the opinion of the Bishop of Rome was by no means accepted automatically. The bishops of Rome, obviously, never belonged to either the Antioch or the Alexandria schools of theology and, as a rule, managed to conduct a middle course between any extremes proposed by theologians of any school. Since Rome was removed from the centers of Christianity in the Eastern Mediterranean, it was often hoped that his bishop would be more impartial. For example, in 431, Cyril, Patriarch of Alexandria, addressed Pope Celestin I, as well as other patriarchs, accusing TheOrthus of Constantinople of heresy, which was considered at the Council of Ephesus. In 342, Pope Julius I wrote, The custom was for a word that must be written first to us (in the case of bishops indicted, and especially in the Apostolic Churches), and then for a simple sentence to be passed from this place. It was also decreed by the Council of Sardis, which declared St. Athanasia the rightful bishop of Alexandria in 382, the synod in Rome protested against the rise of Constantinople to the position above Alexandria and referred to Rome as an apostolic see. Pope Syriza (384-399) claimed that for papal declarations as binding force as the decisions of synods, Pope Innocent I (401-417) stated that all major court cases should be reserved for seeing Rome, and Pope Boniface I (418-422) stated that the Church of Rome stands before churches around the world as the head of its bishops while holding the same bishop's office must recognize those to whom, for the sake of church discipline, they must be the subject. Celestina I (b. 422-432) believed that Nestoria's condemnation of his own Roman synod in 430 was sufficient, but agreed with the General Council as a good faith. Pope Leo I and his successors rejected the canon of the 28th Halkedon Council, making it not officially registered even in the East until the 6th century. The Acacia schism, when for time, the West is lining up against the East in a clear form, 132 ended with the adoption of a declaration insisted by Pope Hormiddas (514-523) that I hope that I will remain in communion with the Apostolic throne, which is the whole, true and perfect stability of the Christian religion. Earlier, in 494, Pope Gelasius I (492-496) wrote to the Byzantine Emperor Anastasia, distinguishing the power of the civil rulers from the authority of the bishops (called priests in the document), with the latter being the supreme in religious matters; he ended his letter: And if it is appropriate that the hearts of believers should obey all priests in general, who duly govern divine affairs, the greater the obedience due to the bishop of the one who sees how omnisused is meant to be above all others, and who is therefore obediently revered by the devotion of the whole Church. Pope Nicholas I (858-867) made it clear that, in his opinion, the power of the papacy is spreading all over the earth, that is, over every church. Claims to Constantinople Hegia Sofia, The Cathedral of Constantinople during the split in 330, Emperor Constantine moved the imperial capital to Byzantium, which later became Constantinople. The center of gravity in the empire was fully recognized completely transferred to the eastern Mediterranean. Rome lost the Senate to Constantinople and lost its status and gravitas as the imperial capital. The Bishop of Byzantium was under the rule of Metropolitan Herakleigh when, in 330, the Roman Emperor Constantine I moved his residence to this city, which, rebuilt on a larger scale, became known as Constantinople. After that, the bishop's connection with the imperial court meant that he was able to free himself from the church dependence on Hercules and in just over half a century to receive recognition of the next post-Rome rating from the First Council of Constantinople (381), which took place in the new capital. He ruled: Bishop of Constantinople, however, has the prerogative of honor after the bishop of Rome; because Constantinople is the new Rome, thus lifting it above the see-sees of Alexandria and Antioch. This was described as seed seeding for the ecclesiastical rivalry between Constantinople and Rome, which was a factor leading to a split between East and West. The website of the Orthodox Church in America states that Bishop Byzantian was elevated to the Patriarch in constant times. Separation in the Roman Empire contributed to the disunity in the Church. Theodosius the Great, who in 380 established Nicaea Christianity as the official religion of the Roman Empire (see Decree Thessalonica), was the last emperor to rule the unified Roman Empire. After the death of Theodosia in 395, the Empire was divided for the last time western and eastern halves. In the 4th century, the Roman emperor (ruling in Constantinople) began to control the Church on its territory. Constantinople patriarchs often tried to take a leadership position towards other patriarchs, provoking their resistance. For example, in 431, Patriarch Kirill of Alexandria announced impeachment for the Russian Patriarch of Constantinople Nestorius. Alexandria's objections to the promotion of Constantinople, which led to a constant struggle between the two sees in the first half of the 5th century, were supported by Rome, which offered the theory that the most important sees were the Three Petrins, Rome, Antioch and Alexandria, with Rome in the first place. However, the power of the Patriarch of Constantinople continued to grow. The Eastern Orthodox Church states that the 28th canon of the Council of Halkedon (451) explicitly proclaimed the equality of the bishops of Rome and Constantinople, and that it established the highest court of church appeal in Constantinople. The Patriarch of the imperial capital succeeded in his efforts to become the leading bishop of the Byzantine Empire: he led the vast Curia and other bishops who lived in Constantinople, forming a permanent synod, which became the real governing body of the church. Patriarch John IV of Constantinople, who died in 595, was named Ecumenical Patriarch. The idea that with the transfer of the imperial capital from Rome to Constantinople, the primacy in the Church was also postponed, was found in an undeveloped form back in John Philoponus (c. 490 - c. 570). It was declared in the most advanced form by Constantinople Fotia I (c. 810 - c. 893). Constantinople, as the seat of the ruler of the empire and therefore the world, was the highest among the patriarchy and, as emperor, had the right to rule them. Council of Nicaea (325) Main article: First Council of The Nicaea See also: Constantine the Great and Christianity and the icon of bizantinism with the image of Emperor Constantine (center) and bishops of the First Cathedral of Niki After the Roman Emperor Constantine the Great legalized Christianity (with the decree of the Milan decree), he in 325 summoned the First Ecumenical Council in Nika. The bishops at the cathedral reaffirmed the position of the Metropolitan of Rome and Alexandria as having power outside his province, as well as the existing privileges of churches in Antioch and other provinces. These sees were later called the Patriarchy. (quote necessary) He was given the order of priority: Rome, as the capital of the empire, naturally took first place, then came Alexandria and Antioch. In a separate canon, the Council also endorsed the special honour given to Jerusalem by other Besides, the Metropolitan. First Cathedral of Constantinople (381) Additional information: The Patriarchy of Rome is dominated by Emperor Theodosius I convened the second ecumenical cathedral (Constantinople I) in the imperial capital in 381. The Council elevated to see Constantinople, in a position ahead of the other chiefs the Metropolitan sees, except Rome, thus raising it above sees Alexandria and Antioch. This action was described as seed seeding for the ecclesiastical rivalry between Constantinople and Rome, which ultimately was a factor leading to a split between East and West. He delineated the territory in the Praetorian Prefecture of the East into five canonical territories, corresponding to the five civil dioceses: the Diocese of (metropolis in Alexandria), the Diocese of the East (metropolis in Antioch), the Diocese of Asia (Metropolis of Ephesus), the Diocese of Pontus (metropolis in Caesaria Cappadocia) and the Diocese of Thracia (metropolis in Herak) (the metropolis of Herak) he ruled that the synod of each province should manage the church affairs of this province alone except for the privileges already recognized for seeing Alexandria and Antioch. No Western bishop was present at the cathedral, and no lebate of the Bishop of Rome was present. The Latin Church recognized the cathedral as ecumenical about 150 years later, in the middle of the 6th century. Chalcedon (451) Roman Tom the Lion (449) was highly appreciated and formed the basis of the wording of the Council of Halkedon. But it was not accepted and was even called unaccustomed and blasphemous by those who condemned the council that approved and accepted it. The next ecumenical council corrected a possible imbalance in the representation of the Pope Leo. Although the Bishop of Rome has always been respected even in this early day, the East believes that the concept of the primacy of the Roman Throne and the Pontifical Infallibility was developed much later. The controversial canon of 28 of the Chalcedon Council in 451, confirming the power already hired by Constantinople, granted it the archbishop's jurisdiction over Pontius and Thrace. The Council has also ratified the agreement between Antioch and Jerusalem, under which Jerusalem has jurisdiction over the three provinces, and it is among the top five. Thus, five patriarchs currently preside over the Byzantine Empire: Patriarch of Rome, Patriarch of Constantinople, Patriarch of Alexandria, Patriarch of Antioch and Patriarch of Jerusalem. Although Leo I, whose delegates were absent at the time of its adoption of this resolution, recognized the Council as ecumenical and reaffirmed its doctrine he rejected his canon 28 on the grounds that it contravened the sixth canon of Nicae and infringed on the rights of Alexandria and Antioch. This canon remained a constant source of east-West friction until the mutual excommunication of 1054 made it irrelevant in this regard; But the debate about its applicability to the authority of the Patriarchate of Constantinople continues to this day. The same controversial canon also recognized the power of Constantinople over the bishops of the dioceses among the barbarians, which was differently interpreted as relating either to all areas outside the Byzantine Empire, or only to those who are in the vicinity of Ponta, Asia and Thrace, or to non-Greeks in the empire. Canon 9 of the Council also proclaimed: If a bishop or clergyman must have a difference with the Metropolitan of the province, let him, when addressing the exarch of the diocese, or to the throne of the Imperial City of Constantinople, and let it be tested. This was interpreted as giving Constantinople greater privilege than what any council has ever given Rome, or as much less value than that. Separation of the West from the Roman Empire See also: The fall of the Western Roman Empire In 476, when the last emperor of the western Roman Empire was overthrown and Western imperial insignia were sent to Constantinople, the only Roman emperor reappeared. However, in the West he had little power, which was almost entirely ruled by various Germanic tribes. According to Randall R. Cloud, the permanent separation of the Greek East from the Latin West was the main reason for the alienation that soon followed between Greek and Latin Christians. The dominant language of the West was Latin, while the eastern language was Greek. Shortly after the West's fall to the invaders, the number of people who spoke both languages decreased, and the connection between East and West became much more complex. With the departed linguistic unity, cultural unity began to crumble as well. The two halves of the Church were, of course, separated along similar lines; they developed different rites and had different approaches to religious doctrines. Although there were many centuries before the split, its outlines were already visible. In the areas in which he was controlled, Justinian I established Caesaropapism as the Constitution of the Church in a scheme under which the emperor had the right and duty to regulate the minute details of worship and discipline by his laws, as well as to dictate theological opinions to be held in the Church. According to the Westminster Dictionary of Theological Terms, this Caesaropianism was a source of discord between Rome and Constantinople, which led to the split of 1054. Explicit approval of the emperor in Constantinople required to consecrate bishops within the empire. In the period called the Byzantine papacy, this applies to the bishops of Rome, most of whom were of Greek or Syrian origin. Indignation in the West against the management of the Church by the Byzantine emperor manifested itself in the 1st century, when tolerance of the Aryan Gothic king was preferred to the caesarean claims of Constantinople. The origins of different views in the West and east are sometimes associated in the ivory part even with Augustine Hippo, who saw the relationship between church and state as a tension between the city of God and the city of the world and Eusebius, who saw the state as the protector of the church and the emperor as God's vicar on earth. The decline of the three patriarchies By 661 Muslim Arabs took over the territories classified as the patriarchy of Alexandria, Antioch and Jerusalem, which were subsequently never more than partially and temporarily restored. In 732, Emperor Leo III of Isauri, in retaliation for the opposition of Pope Gregory III to the iconoclonic policy of the emperor, handed over Sicily, Calabria and Illyria from the Roman Patriarchate (whose jurisdiction had previously extended as far east as Thessalonica) Constantinople. The Patriarchate of Constantinople, after expanding eastwards during the Cathedral of Chalcedon to take in Pontus and the Roman province of Asia, which at that time was still under the control of the emperor, thus expanded equally to the west and was practically coextensive with the Byzantine Empire. The council in Trullo (Kuinisest, 692) The West's rejection of the Council of 692 of kuinisest 692 led to pressure from the Eastern Empire to the West to reject many Latin customs as non-Orthodox. Latin practice, which attracted the attention of other Patriarchs and which was condemned by this Council, included the practice of celebrating Mass on weekdays in Lent (rather than pre-consecrated liturgies); Fasting on Saturdays throughout the year; Omitting Alleluia in Lent; depicting Christ as a lamb; Using unsyable bread. Larger disputes were revealed about the attitude of Eastern and Westerners towards celibacy for priests and deacons, with the Council affirming the right of married men to become priests (although it prohibited priests from marrying and forbade bishops to live with their wives) and ordered the deposition of anyone who tried to separate the priest except the bishop from his wife. , or for any clergyman other than the bishop who dismissed his wife. Pope Sergius I, who was of Syrian origin, rejected the advice. Emperor Justinian II ordered his arrest. It was thwarted. In 694, in Vestigot , the council was ratified by the eighteenth Council of Toledo at the urging of King Vittiza. Fruela I Asturias overturned Toledo's decision sometime during his reign (757-768). (quote necessary) Papal supremacy and Pentarchy Additional information: Pentarchy The main reasons for the split were the controversy over the controversial claims of jurisdiction, particularly over the papal power-Pope Leo IX claimed that he held power over the four Eastern Patriarchs, and for the inclusion of the filioque position in the Nice Creed by the Western Patriarch in 1014. The Eastern Orthodox Church today states that the Council of the Halkedon Canon 28 explicitly proclaimed the equality of the bishops of Rome and Constantinople and that it established the highest court of church appeal in Constantinople. The Council of Ephesus Canon 7 stated: It is illegal for any person to nominate, or write, or to compose another (ἑτέραν) Faith as a rival to what is established by the holy fathers gathered with the Holy Spirit in Nicaea. But those who dare to make another faith, or to present or offer it to persons wishing to seek recognition of the truth, whether from cunning or from Judaism, or from any heren at all, must be overthrown if they are bishops or clergymen; bishops from the episcopate and clergy clergy; and if they're lay, they will be anathemaized - Schaff 1916, p. 197, Ch. IV Council of Ephesus, Session I Excerpts from the acts of the Eastern Orthodox today will say that this canon of the Council of Ephesus explicitly banned the change of the Nice Credo, compiled by the first Ecumenical Council in 325, the wording of which, allegedly, but not substance, was changed by the Second Ecumenical Council, making additions such as those from the Father. Orthodox claim that the First Cathedral of Ephesus Canon 7 explicitly prohibited the change of the Nice Creed by any person (not the ecumenical church council) drawn up by the first Ecumenical Council in 325. In fact, the Council made no exceptions for the ecumenical cathedral or any other body of bishops, and the Greeks participating in the Council of Florence strongly denied that even the ecumenical council had the right to add anything to the creed. The credo quoted in the Acts of Ephesus 431 (the third ecumenical cathedral) is that the first ecumenical cathedral, Nikaya (325), is unchanged, which the second ecumenical cathedral, held in Constantinople in 381, is understood as being made into it, for example, adding who comes from the Father. Eastern Orthodox theologians said that this change in the wording of the original worship of churches was made in order to address various teachings outside the church in particular the teachings of Macedonian I of Constantinople, which, according to the cathedral, was a distortion of the church's teachings of the Holy Spirit. It wasn't a change. the original creed of the churches. Thus, the word ἑτέραν in the seventh canon of the later Council of Ephesus is understood to mean other or contradictory rather than other in the sense of simple explanatory additions to the existing religion. Some scholars believe that the additions attributed to the First Constantinople Council were adopted only with 451 Chalchedon Council, 20 years after Ephesus, and even that the Council of Ephesus, which was dominated by Alexandrian influence, was this canon, excluding the Constantispolitan Creed, which eventually annexed the name and glory of the religion adopted in Nica. The questions of the Phyilioka and the primate (867-879) Main articles: Constantinople Cathedral (867), The Fourth Constantinople Cathedral (Roman Catholic) and the Fourth Constantinople Cathedral (Eastern Orthodox) Three cathedrals were held, two by Constantinople, one by Rome. Rome tried to replace the sitting Patriarch with one forged to the filook dispute. The Orthodox responded by denouncing the replacement and excommunicating the pope, draining the pope's attempt to control matters outside Rome's purview and draining the addition of Philioc to the heresy. Each church recognizes its own council (s) as legitimate and does not recognize the other council (s). Mutual excommunication of the Church 1054 Changes in the scale of the Empire ruled from Constantinople. 476 The End of the Western Empire; 550 Conquests of Justinian I; 717 Joining Leo Isauursky; 867 Joining Basil I; 1025 Death of Basil II; 1095 The Eve of the First Crusade; 1170 under Manuel I; 1270 under Michael VIII Palaiologist; 1400 Before the Fall of Constantinople Part series onPersecutions of the Catholic Church Review of the Historical Persecution of Christians of the Vatican and 1846-1958 Catholic Church Persecution 1939-1958 Elimination of the Church under Stalinism East Catholic persecution of Christians in the modern era of the Roman Empire Persecution of Christians in Roman Empire Diocletteian Persecution of the Neo-Persian Empire Sasan Conquest of the Jerusalem Byzantine Empire East-West Split Massacre latin of the Muslim Conquests Conversion of non-Islamic places of worship in mosques Assyrian Genocide Kosheh massacre of Christianity in Saudi Arabia in Egypt Maspero demonstration of Persecution christians ISIS of Japan European War religion Thirty years war France Dechristianization France during the French War Revolution in Vande Iniquiis afflictisque Saints Jose Sanchez del Rio Persecution of Christians in Mexico Spain Omey conquest Hispania Civil War Martyrs Turon martyrs Daimiel Bartolome Blanco Blanco Innocencio Maria Immaculate Jose Maria Manila 233 Spanish martyrs 498 Spanish martyrs 522 Spanish martyrs NetherlandsTitus Brandsma Nazi persecution of the Catholic Church in Germany Max Joseph Metzger Carl Leisner Maximilian Colbe Saints of China Persecution of Christians in China Ad Apostolorum principisius Ignat Kung Pin Mei Jan Chang Chang Chang Tan Nguyễn Won Thuận Ngo An Diệm (, Huế Phật Đản Shooting, Huế Chemical Attacks, Double Seven Days Brawl, X' Lợi Pagoda raids, 1963 South Vietnamese coup, arrest and murder of Ngo Anh Diệm) Polish anti-religious campaign 1945-1990 Stefan You 108 Blessed Polish Martyrs Politics Polonia Annalibus Gloriosam Reginam Invicti athletae Hedgehog Popelushko of Eastern Europe Jazef Mindszenty Eugene Bossilkov Northerns Baranik Independent State of Croatia zinoviy Kovalyk Anni sacra Leonie Theodore Romja Violence against Christians in India 2008 attacks on Christians in southern Karnataka Nicaragua Salvador Four U.S. Ignacio Ellacuria Ignacio Martin-Baro Oscar Romero 1989 murder of the Jesuits NigeriaReligious violence in Anti- Catholicism in the United Kingdom List of Catholic Martyrs of the English Reformation Forty Martyrs of England and Wales Irish Catholic Martyrs Dissolution monasteries Criminal laws Cromwell conquest of Ireland Catholic Church in North Korea Catholicism portalvte In 1053 Leo Ohridsky, initiated by J. B. Bury, Patriarch Michael Cerularius of Constantinople, intended for all Latin bishops, including the pope, in which he attacked Western practices, such as the use of unleaded bread for the Eucharist, and the rules of fasting that differed from the rules in Constantinople, while the Serular himself closed all Latin churches in Constantinople. In response, Leo IX wrote a letter in Terra pax dated September 2, 1053, addressed to Cerularia and Leo Ohrid, in which he details the privileges granted through St. Peter to see Rome. In one of the 41 sections of his letter, he also speaks of the privileges granted by the emperors, citing a document of Constantine's donation, which he considered authentic (section 20). Some scholars say that The letter was never sent, but was postponed, and that papal response actually sent was a softer but still harsh letter scripta tuae January 1054. The promotion of the Norman conquest of southern Italy posed a threat to the possessions of both the Byzantine Empire and the papacy, each of which sought the support of the other. Accordingly, conciliatory letters, the texts of which were not preserved, were written to the Pope by the Emperor and Serular. In his reply to the emperor, Kwantas Gratias, in January 1054, Leo IX asks him for help against the Normans and complains about what the Pope saw as the arrogance of Kerularia. In his reply to Caerricularia, he appealed to the patriarch for an attempt to put the patriarchs of Alexandria and Antioch before him and for the adoption of the title of Ecumenical Patriarch and insisted on the primacy to see Rome. The division between the Eastern and Western Churches in 1054. The two letters were entrusted to a delegation of three legates led by the undiplomatic Cardinal Umbert Silva Candida, as well as friedrich Lorraine, who was the papal secretary and Cardinal Deacon of Santa Maria in Domnica, and Peter, Archbishop of Amalfi. They received friendship and support from the emperor, but were rejected by the patriarch. Finally, on July 16, 1054, three months after the death of Pope Leo in April 1054 and nine months before the next pope took office, they laid on the altar of Hagia Sofia, which was prepared to celebrate the Divine Liturgy, the bull of the excommunication of Serularia and his supporters. At the synod, held on July 20, 1054, Serularius, in turn, excommunicated legates. In fact, only Michael may have been excommunicated along with his then living supporters. During the excommunication, many modern historians, including Byzantine chroniclers, do not consider this event significant. In the following centuries, emperors, popes, and patriarchs made efforts to heal the schism between the churches. However, a number of factors and historical events have worked to expand the division over time. East and West since 1054: Even after 1054, friendly relations between East and West continued. Two parts of the Christian world did not yet realize the great chasm of separation between them. ... The dispute remained something that ordinary Christians in the East and West largely did not know about. There was not a single event that marked the breakdown. Rather, the two churches have slipped in and out of the schism for several centuries, interspersed with temporary reconciliation. Interfaith tensions in the Byzantine Empire in the 11th and 12th centuries, beginning in the late 11th century, the dependence of the Byzantine Empire on the naval forces of the Republic of Venice and, The Republic of Genoa and the Republic of Pisa led to the predominance of Catholic merchants in Byzantia (they received large trade concessions since the 1080s), which subsequently caused economic and social upheaval. Together with the perceived arrogance of the Italians, this fueled popular resentment among the middle and lower classes, both in rural areas and in cities. In the second half of the 12th century, almost uncontrollable rivalry between rivals from different city-states led to the Italians raiding the neighborhoods of other Italians in the capital, and the draconian response of the Byzantine authorities led to a subsequent deterioration of inter-ethnic relations in the city. When in 1182 the regency of Empress Maria of Antioch, an ethnic Frenchman known for favoritism shown to Latin merchants and large aristocratic landowners, was overthrown by Andronikos I Comenos after popular support, the new emperor allowed the crowds to crack down on hated foreigners. From now on, Byzantine foreign policy has always been perceived in the West as sinister and anti-Latin. Fourth Crusade (1204) and Other Military Conflicts Main Articles: The Fourth Crusade, Siege of Constantinople (1204), and the Northern Crusades See also: Massacre of Latin during the Fourth Crusade 1202-1204 Latin Crusaders and Venetian merchants plundered Constantinople (1204), plundering the Church of Holy Wisdom and various other Orthodox shrines, and converting them into Latin American worship. The Norman Crusaders also destroyed the Imperial Library of Constantinople. The various holy artifacts from these Orthodox holy sites were taken out by whom? The Crusaders also appointed the Latin Patriarch of Constantinople. The conquest of Constantinople and the final treaty established the Latin Empire of the East and the Latin Patriarch of Constantinople (with various other Crusader states). Later, some religious artifacts were sold in Europe to finance or finance the Latin Empire in Byzantium - as when Emperor Baldwin of Constantinople II (b. 1228-1261) sold the relic of the Ship's Crown, trying to raise new funds to maintain his rule on Byzantium. In 1261, the Byzantine emperor Michael VIII Palaiologists gave the Latin Empire to an end. However, the Western attack on the heart of the Byzantine Empire is seen by who? as a factor that ultimately led to its conquest by Ottoman Muslims in the 15th century. Many scholars believe that the dismissal of Constantinople in 1204 contributed more to the schism than the events of 1054. In Northern Europe, the Teutonic knights, after their successes in the Northern Crusade of the 12th and 13th centuries, tried (1240) to conquer the Eastern Orthodox Russian Republics of Pskov and enterprise enterprise Gregory IX (Dad from 1227 to 1241). One of the main defeats suffered by the Teutonic Knights was the Battle of Ice in 1242. Catholic Sweden has also conducted several campaigns against orthodox Novgorod. There were also conflicts between Catholic Poland and Orthodox Russia. Such conflicts have strengthened the east-West divide. The Second Lyon Council (1272) The Second Council of Lyon was co-advised to act under the promise of Michael VIII to reunite the Eastern Church with the West. Wanting to end the Great Divide by dividing Rome and Constantinople, Gregory X sent the embassy to Michael VIII, who recaptured Constantinople, putting an end to the remnants of the Latin Empire in the East, and asked the Latin despots in the East to curb their ambitions. On June 29 (the feast of Saints Peter and Paul, the patronage feast of the Popes) Gregory X celebrated Mass in st. John's Church, which was attended by both sides. The Council stated that the Roman Church had the highest and full primacy and power over the universal Catholic Church. The union was a sham and political gambit, a fiction backed by the emperor to prevent westerners from knowing the city of Constantinople, which they lost just over a decade ago, in 1261. It was fiercely opposed to the clergy and the people and was never fought, despite the sustained campaign of Patriarch John XI of Constantinople, a convert to the cause of the union, to defend the union intellectually, and the vigorous and brutal repression of Michael's opponents. In 1278, Pope Nicholas III, learning about the fictitious nature of Greek conformity, sent the legates to Constantinople, demanding the personal subordination of each Orthodox cleric and the adoption of Philioc, as already Greek delegates in Lyon had to read the Creed with the inclusion of Filioc and repeat it two more times. Emperor Michael's attempts to resolve the schism ended when Pope Martin IV, seeing that the union was only a sham, excommunicated Michael VIII VIII 1281 in support of Karl Anjou's attempts to mount a new campaign to retake the East Roman provinces lost by Michael. The son and successor of Michael VIII Andronicus II renounced the union, and Beckis was forced to abdicate, eventually being expelled and imprisoned until his death in 1297. Council of Ferrara-Florence (1439) Additional information: Council of Florence and Laetentur Caeli In the 15th century, the Eastern Emperor John VIII Paleiologist, heavily pressed by the Ottoman Turks, seeks to unite with the West, and to do so he arranged with Pope Eugene IV to discuss reunification held again, this time in the Council of Ferrara-Florence. After several long discussions, the emperor was persuaded to accept the Western doctrines of Philioc, Purgatory and the supremacy of the papacy. On June 6, 1439, all but one of the Eastern bishops present, Mark Ephesus, signed an agreement that held Rome in both heresy and division. It seemed that the Great Divide was over. However, upon returning, the Eastern bishops found their agreement with the West, widely rejected by the population and civilian authorities (with the exception of the emperors of the East, who remained committed to the union until the fall of Constantinople two decades later). The Union signed in Florence was never accepted by the Eastern churches. The fall of Constantinople (1453) and then the main article: The Fall of Constantinople In May 1453, the capital of the Eastern Roman Empire fell on the invasion of the Ottoman Empire. But Orthodoxy has already been established in Russia, whose political and de facto religious center has shifted from Kiev to Moscow. The Russian Church, part of the Constantinople Church until the middle of the 15th century, gained full independence (autocephaly) and in 1589 was elevated to the rank of Patriarchate. The Russian political and church elite came to consider Moscow as the Third Rome, the rightful heir to Constantinople and Byzantium. During ottoman rule, the Orthodox Church acquired the status of autonomous millet, in particular Rum Millet. The Ecumenical Patriarch became the ruler (millet-bash) of all Orthodox Christian subjects of the empire, including non-Greeks. Having conquered Constantinople, Mehmed II assumed the legal function of the Byzantine emperors and appointed Patriarch Gennady II. Sultans strengthened the temporary powers of the Greek Orthodox hierarchy, which was politically obliged exclusively to the Ottoman sultan and, along with other Ottoman Greek nobles, came to govern the Balkan Orthodox possessions of the Ottoman Empire. As a result, all Orthodox communication between the Balkans and the Middle East has become isolated from the rest of the Christian world. Over the next four hundred years, it will be restricted in an Islamic world with which it has little religious or cultural in common. In Russia, anti-Catholic sentiment was entrenched as a result of the Polish intervention in the early 17th century, which was shattered as an attempt to convert Moscow into Catholicism. The modern Russian national holiday, National Unity Day, was established on the day of the church holiday in honor of the Kazan icon of Our Lady, which is believed to have miraculously saved Moscow from direct Polish conquest in 1612. Patriarch Hermogen of Moscow was executed by Poles and their supporters during this period (see also the Polish-Lithuanian-Moscow Commonwealth). The First Vatican Council (1870) The Doctrine of the Pontifical Championship was further developed at the First Vatican Council, which that in God's disposition, the Roman church has the place of ordinary power over all other churches. This council also reaffirmed the dogma of papal infallibility, stating that the infallibility of the Christian community extends to the Pope himself when he defines a doctrine concerning faith or morality that must be carried out by the entire Church. This new dogma, as well as the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, proclaimed in Ineffabilis Deus a few years earlier, is unequivocally rejected by the Eastern Church as Yemeni. The main event of the Second Vatican Council (Vatican II) was the proclamation by Pope Paul and the Orthodox Patriarch of Constantinople Athenagor I of the Catholic Orthodox Joint Declaration of 1965. At the same time, they abolished mutual weaning dating back to the 11th century. The act did not affect the restoration of communication. Eastern Catholic Church Main Article: Eastern Catholic ChurchSeem also: Codex of canons of the Eastern Churches, the Union of Brest and the Union of UzhogorodsSize Catholic churches, historically referred to as Orthodox Uniate, consider themselves conciliators of the Eastern and Western divisions, while accepting the primacy of the bishop of Rome, while maintaining some canonical rules and liturgical practices in accordance with the Eastern tradition of the Orthodox Church. Some Orthodox believe that joining this unity is due to ignoring critical doctrinal differences and past atrocities. Periodically there were conflicts between Orthodox and Eastern Catholics in Ukraine and Belarus, then under Polish rule, and then in Transylvania (see Romanian Greek Catholic Church, united with Rome). Pressure and government-sponsored repression were used against Eastern Catholic churches, such as the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church in the Russian Empire and then in the USSR. Since the late 1980s, the Moscow Patriarchate (Russian Orthodox Church) has criticized the methods of restoring uniate church structures in Ukraine, as well as what it called Catholic proselytism in Russia. In 1993, a report written by the Joint International Commission on Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church during the 7th plenary session of the Balamand School of Theology in Lebanon stated: Because Catholics and Orthodox christians re-examine each other in their dealings with the secret Church and re-discover each other as the Sister Church, this form of apostolicism has been described above. , can no longer be accepted either as a method to follow or as a model of unity to which our Churches aspire. At the same time, the document states, in particular: As far as the Eastern Catholic churches are concerned, it is clear that they, as part of the Catholic communion, have the right to exist and act in response to the spiritual needs of their believers. Eastern Catholic churches, which wished to restore full communication with the Roman and remained faithful to it, have the rights and responsibilities associated with this communication. The principles that define their attitude towards Orthodox churches are principles that were stated by the Second Vatican Council and were introduced by the popes, who explained the practical implications of these principles in various documents published since then. These Churches, therefore, must be included, both locally and universally, in the dialogue of love, in mutual respect and mutual trust, re-found, and enter into a theological dialogue with all its practical consequences. In February 2016, and Patriarch Kirill of the Russian Orthodox Church (ROC) met in Cuba and signed a joint declaration, which stated, inter alia, We hope that our meeting can also promote reconciliation where there are tensions between Greek Catholics and Orthodox Christians. Today it is clear that the past method of uniatism, understood as an alliance of one community with another, separating it from its Church, is not a way to restore unity. Nevertheless, the church communities that emerged in these historical circumstances have the right to exist and to do whatever is necessary to meet the spiritual needs of their believers in order to live in peace with their neighbours. Orthodox and Greek Catholics need reconciliation and mutually acceptable forms of coexistence. Meanwhile, in an interview published on the eve of the meeting in Cuba, Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeev, Chairman of the Department of External Church Relations and a permanent member of the Holy Synod of the Russian Orthodox Church, stated that tensions between the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church and the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Russian Orthodox Church had recently escalated mainly because of the conflict in Ukraine. The statement was sharply criticized by Sviatoslav Shevchuk, the head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, who said his flock felt betrayed by the Vatican. Recent efforts to reconcile the Joint Theological Commission, Inspired by the spirit of the Vatican II, which adopted Unitatis Redintegratio's decree on ecumenism in 1964, as well as the change in attitude towards ecumenism by the Moscow Patriarchate, which occurred in 1961, the Vatican and 14 recognized autocephalous Orthodox churches established a Joint International Commission on Theological Dialogue between the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church, which first met in Rhodes 1980 is a continuous effort. Other steps towards reconciliation In some cases Pope John Paul II read the Nice Creed with the patriarchs of the Eastern Orthodox Church in Greek in accordance with the original text. Both he and his successor, Pope Benedict XVI, read the Nicaea credo together with Patriarch Dimitri I and Bartholomew I in Greek without the position of Philioc, according to the use of the Byzantine Churches. This is consistent with the Catholic Church's practice of incorporating this provision into Latin recitalation, but not when reading it in Greek. In June 1995, Patriarch Bartholomew I of Constantinople visited the Vatican for the first time and joined the historic inter-religious day of prayer for peace in Assisi. John Paul II and Bartholomew I expressed their mutual desire to forget the excommunication of the past and instead return to full communion. In May 1999, John Paul II became the first pope since the Great Divide to visit one of the Orthodox countries: Romania. Welcoming John Paul II, the Romanian Patriarch theOcctist stated: The second millennium of Christian history began with the painful wound of the unity of the Church; at the end of this millennium, we saw a real commitment to the restoration of Christian unity. John Paul II visited other heavily Orthodox areas such as Ukraine, despite the lack of greetings at times, and he said that healing the differences between Western and Eastern Christianity was one of his most loving desires. In June 2004, Bartholomew I's visit to Rome for the feast of Saints Peter and Paul (June 29) provided him with another face-to-face meeting with John Paul II, to talk to the Pontifical Council to promote Christian unity and to participate in the celebration of the day of the holiday in St. Peter's Basilica. The Patriarch's partial participation in the Eucharistic liturgy, presided over by the Pope, followed a programme of past visits by Patriarch Dimitrios (1987) and Patriarch Bartholomew I himself: full participation in the Liturgy of the Word, the joint proclamation by the Pope and the Patriarch of the profession of faith in accordance with the Nikino-Constantino-Constantinopolic Creed in Greek and conclusion, the final Blessing, the final Blessing, the Pope The Patriarch did not participate fully in the liturgy of the Eucharist, which was associated with the consecration and distribution of the Eucharist itself. Despite the efforts of Catholic popes and Orthodox Patriarchs to combat division, only limited progress towards reconciliation has been made over the past half century. One of the stumbling blocks is the fact that Orthodox and Catholics have different perceptions of the nature of the gap. Official Catholic is that the Orthodox are divisive, meaning that there is nothing heretical about their theology, only their reluctance to accept the supremacy of the Pope, which is presented in Catholic teaching as a mostly ecclesiological issue, not so much theological. Orthodox object to the Catholic doctrines of Purgatory, Vicar of Redemption, Immaculate Conception and Papal Supremacy, among others, as herthetic doctrines. As for the pope's primacy, the two churches agree that the Pope, as bishop of Rome, has primacy, although they still have different interpretations of what entails this primacy. The attitude of the Catholic Church was expressed by John Paul II in the form of the Church, breathing two lungs. He was referring to a combination of a more rational, legal, like-minded organization of Latin temperament with an intuitive, mystical and contemplative spirit found in the East. According to the Orthodox, the Bishop of Rome (i.e. the Pope) will have universal primacy in the reunited Christian church as a primus between couples without the power of jurisdiction. Ecclesiological reconciliation Eastern Orthodox insist that the primacy is largely an honor, the Pope was first among equals primus between pares. The Catholic Church, on the other hand, insists on the doctrine of superiority. There is a widespread understanding that in order to achieve reconciliation, the two sides will have to compromise on this doctrine. While some commentators have suggested ways to reach such a compromise, there is no official indication that such a compromise is being considered. In his book The Principles of Catholic Theology, Pope Benedict XVI (then Cardinal Ratzinger) assessed the range of possibilities that are open to Christian ecumenism. He described the maximum demand of the West as recognition by the East and submission to the primacy of the Bishop of Rome in the full definition of 1870... The maximum demand of the East was described by the West as a declaration of the doctrine of the papal primacy of 1870 as erroneous along with the removal of The Philioc from The Creed and including the Mariana dogma of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Ratzinger argued that one of the maximum solutions gives real hope for unity. Ratzinger wrote that Rome should not demand more from the East than was formulated and what was lived in the first millennium. He concluded that Reunification could take place in this context if, on the one hand, the East ceased to oppose its developments in the West in the second millennium, and accept the Catholic Church as legitimate and Orthodox as it acquired in the course of this development, and on the other hand, the West recognizes the Church of the East as Orthodox in She's always been. The Declaration of Ravenna in 2007 reaffirmed the belief that the Bishop of Rome is indeed a protos, although discussions will be held in the future on the specific ecclesiological exercise of the papal primacy. Theological agreement This section requires additional citations to verify. Please help improve this article by adding quotes to reliable sources. Non-sources of materials can be challenged and removed. (October 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message pattern) Some scholars, such as Jeffrey Finch, argue that the future of East-West rapprochement seems to overcome the modern controversy of neo-scholasticism and neo-spllamism. These doctrinal questions relate to the Orthodox perception that Catholic theologians lack the real experience of God called theory, and thus do not understand the importance of the heart as a noetic or intuitive faculty. Precisely what they consider to be the Catholic Church's reliance on pagan metaphysical philosophy and rational methods, such as scholasticism rather than the intuitive experience of God (aoria), makes the Orthodox consider the Catholic Church to be etotic. Other points of doctrinal difference include differences in human nature, as well as differences in original sin, purgatory, and the nature of hell. One point of theological difference is embodied in the dispute over the inclusion of Philioc in the Nick Creed. According to the Catholic Church, what it calls the legitimate complementarity of expressions from the Father and from the Father and Son, does not allow him not to become rigid, affects the identity of faith in the reality of the same mystery confessed. Orthodox, on the other hand, consider the inclusion of the phrase almost ecthetic (see also the section of the Trinity). More importantly, the Orthodox see Philioc as just the tip of the iceberg and is in fact just a symptom of a much more deeply rooted problem of theology, so deeply ingrained that they consider it thiseristic and even, by some characteristics, an inability to see God and know God. This heresy is supposedly rooted in Frankish paganism, Arianism, Platonist and Aristotle philosophy and Tomic rational and objective scholasticism. In opposition to what they characterize as pagan, herectic and non-beneficial foundations, the Orthodox rely on the intuitive and mystical knowledge and vision of God (atorium), based on heshihazma and nosis. (quote is necessary) Catholics accept as valid East Orthodox intuitive and mystical understandings of God and consider it an addition to rational Western meditation. The of most Orthodox churches through the economy do not require baptism in the Orthodox Church for someone who has previously been baptized in the Catholic Church. Most Orthodox jurisdictions based on the same economies, allow sacramental marriage between an Orthodox Christian and some non-Orthodox Christians. The Catholic Church allows its clergy to perform ordinances of repentance, eucharist and anointing of sick members of the Eastern Orthodox Church if they spontaneously request ordinances and are properly disposed of. It also allows Catholics who cannot approach a Catholic priest to receive these three ordinances from the clergy of the Eastern Orthodox Church, when required by necessity or genuine spiritual advantage, approves of it, and provided that the danger of error or indifference is avoided. Catholic canon law permits marriage between a Catholic and an Orthodox. The Orthodox Church will perform ordinances only for Christians who are not Orthodox if there is an emergency. The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches allows a local Catholic bishop to allow a Catholic priest, regardless of the rite, to bless the marriage of Orthodox believers who can not approach the priest of their own Church without much difficulty, ask for it spontaneously. In exceptional circumstances, Catholics may marry witnesses in the absence of an authorized priest. If there is a priest not authorized to celebrate the marriage, he must be summoned, although the marriage is valid even without his presence. The Code of Canons of the Eastern Churches states that even a non-Catholic priest (and therefore not necessarily belonging to the Eastern Church) can be summoned in these exceptional circumstances. Greece, in November 2008. In 2010, Patriarch Bartholomew I issued an encyclical praising the ongoing dialogue between the Orthodox Church and other Christian churches and criticizing those who are unacceptably fanatical in challenging such dialogue. The encyclical lamented that the dialogues between the two churches were criticized unacceptably fanatically by some, who claim to be defenders of Orthodoxy, despite the fact that these dialogues are conducted with mutual consent and participation of all local Orthodox churches. The patriarch warned that such opponents rise above the episcopal synods and risk creating a schism. He also accused some critics of distorting reality in order to deceive and awaken believers and that they portrayed theological dialogue not as an all-Orthodox effort, but as an attempt only by the Ecumenical Patriarchate. As an example, he pointed to false rumours that an alliance between the Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches was inevitable, claiming that the spreaders of such rumours were fully aware that these theological dialogues remain numerous and require lengthy debate. The Patriarch reiterated that the union is decided not by theological commissions, but by church synods. Notes to the Links : The late 11th century booklet Against the Franks, falsely attributed to Photios I from Constantinople, lists this as the second moment, just after Philioc. In 1995, John Paul II wrote, With the power and authority without which such an office would be illusory, the Bishop of Rome must ensure the communion of all churches. He invited church leaders and their theologians to study with me in a patient and fraternal dialogue on this issue, a dialogue in which, leaving useless disputes behind, we could listen to each other, keeping before us only the will of Christ for His Church and allowing ourselves to be deeply touched by his plea that they could all be one... so the world can believe that you sent me a document of Ravenna dated October 13, 2007, is one of the answers to this invitation. - Eastern Orthodox Churches of the Armenian Apostolic Church,47' Coptic Orthodox Church of Alexandria,48' Ethiopian Orthodox Church Tevahedo,49 Malanqara Orthodox Syrian Church Of Nietas, Archbishop Nicomedi My dearest brother, we do not deny the Roman Church primacy among the five brothers of the Patriarchate; and we recognize her right to the most honorable place in the Ecumenical Council. But she separated from us by her affairs, when through pride she took over the monarchy, which does not belong to her cabinet... How will we accept from it decrees that have been issued without consultation with us and even without our knowledge? If the Roman pontiff, sitting on the high throne of his glory, wants to rattle upon us and, so to speak, throw his mandates at us from a height, and if he wants to judge us and even rule us and our Churches, not taking advice with us, but for his arbitrary pleasure, what kind of brotherhood, or even what kind of parenthood can it be? We must be slaves, not sons, such a Church, and the Roman Throne will not be the pious mother of sons, but a hard and domineering mistress of slaves - Runciman 1955, p. 116 and Ware 1963 - The First Council of Ephesus in 431 stated that it condemned Nestoria forced to this canon and the letter of our most holy father and fellow-servant Co. , Roman Bishop (129) - See also the Fall of Rome - After the creation of Constantinople (the ancient city of Byzantium) as the state capital of the Roman Empire in the early 4th century , a number of important church events saw the status of Bishop of New Rome (as Constantinople was then upgraded to its current position and privileges. (147) The Roman legates excommunicated him from the church. But there was no common excommunication of the Byzantine church, especially the whole east. Legates are carefully secured against that in their bull. [...] They excommunicated Kerularius, Leo Achridsky and their adherents. [...] The real tragedy is that gradually all the other eastern patriarchs stand with Caerularius, and chose to share their schism. [...] The Emperor (not Constantine IX, but his successor) was on the side of his patriarch, and they learned too well to treat the emperor as his overlord in spiritual matters too. [...] it was the usurped power of Constantinople, the erasthyness of the East that turned the personal quarrel into a great schism. The report contains unofficial proposals of the commission, until the competent authorities of the Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church will not make their judgment in connection with this. Citations : b c d e f g Cross - Livingston 2005, page 706. D'Agostyno 2008. Bayer 2004. Palatianos n.d. - Hergenrether 1869, page 62-71. Beck 1982, page 245-247. Lembke 2010. Dragani 2005, page 44. Bilmeier and Tyukhle 1967, page 102. Bury 1923, page 267. Siechenski 2010, page 113. Bayer 2004, page 80. Nichols 2010, page 281. Canon 844 No3. Code of canons of Eastern churches. 2007. Received on 9 March 2020. Anon. 2001, page 149. Pelican 1971, p. 170. a b Haight 2004, page 289. Doyle, Fluffy and Buzzell 2012, page 311. - Millet 2010, page 43-44. b Wolf 1998, page 42. Wolf 1998, page 44. - Cleenewerck 2007, page 107-108, 209-. Ferenc 2006, page 21-22. - b Becjo and Shade 2006, No8. The dishes of 1963, page 27. McPartlan 1995, p. xv. Wolf 1998, page 43. Garuti 2004, page 66, Note 276. Gaillard 2006, page 46. - Cleenewerck 2007, page 22. Show 2000, page 40. The dogmatic Constitution of christ, Chapter 4 - On Faith and Reason. The first Vatican Cathedral (1869-1870). Archive from the original on February 7, 2006. Canon 181. Code of canons of Eastern churches. 2007. Received on 9 March 2020. a b Ware 1963. John Paul II 1995, paragraph 96. Ecclesiological and canonical consequences of the sacramental nature of the Church. Church communion, conciliation and power. Europaica newsletter. Ravenna: Department of External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate. October 13, 2007. Received on March 4, 2020. Ignatius of Antioch 1846, page 116. Lossky 1976, page 176. a b Fortescue 1912. Guimaraes, Atila Sinke. Curiosity from the Orthodox Arena. Tradition in action. - Pope Paul VI (November 21, 1964), Decree on Ecumenism : Unitatis Redintegratio, Rome: Vatican City, n. 17 - b Pomazansky 1984, p. 14, On the procession of the Holy Spirit. a b Romanids, John S. Philioc. Archive of July 29, 2009. b Romanids, John S. Franks, Romans, feudalism and doctrine - Part 2. Empirical theology versus speculative theology is empirical theology. Bindley 1980, page 78. a b Schaff 1877, page 24, No 8. Nice's credo. Nicene Creed (PDF). armenianchurchlibrary.com. received on March 8, 2020. About us. St. Mary and Archangel Michael coptic Orthodox Church. Received on March 9, 2020. A Brief History of the 1st Universiade of Nice. Nine saints of the Ethiopian Orthodox Monastery. Archive from the original on January 26, 2011. Nice's credo. Syrian Orthodox resources. June 8, 1997. Archive from the original on May 7, 2012. Nicki's credo. The Holy Apostolic Catholic Assyrian Church of the East is the archdiocese of Australia, New york and Lebanon. Received on March 9, 2020. Catholic Church 1994, page 65, paragraph 246. 39 articles of religion (1562). The Victorian web. December 2001. Received on March 9, 2020. Three Ecumenical Creeds. Book of Concorde : Confession of luthernan Church. Received on March 9, 2020. Ashley, Greg. Nice's credo. St Andrews reformed the Presbyterian Church. Received on March 9, 2020. - United Methodist Hymn in wayback (archive of February 5, 2012) - Catholic Church 1994, p. 65, paragraph 247. And at the reformed Chaldean Mass. Archive from the original on January 2, 2009. Greek and Latin traditions concerning the Procession of the Holy Spirit. L'Osserviceer Romano. September 20, 1995. Archive from the original on October 26, 2009. b Encyclical of the Eastern Patriarchs, 1848 : Answer to the Message of Pope Pius IX, to the East. sourcebooks.fordham.edu. received on May 27, 2019. Citing Alexei Khomyakov about Philiok and the economics of the Eastern Churches and the Roman Catholicism of Los 1969, page 87 and Lossky 1976. Lossky 1976, page 21. Vlahos 1994, Ch.VI. Theointed 1984, page 2, philosophy and theology. The connection between prayer and theology. American Carpatho-Russian Orthodox Diocese of the United States 2000. Archive from the original on October 11, 2007. Received on February 23, 2013. a b Georgios, archimandrite (n.d.). The non-traditional and Hesichastic nature of Orthodox Athos monasticism. greekorthodoxchurch.org. received on March 9, 2020. a b Vlahos 1994, Ch. III. Romanids 2008, page 19-23. Romanides 1983, page 232. Vlahos 1993, The Fall of Man. Treatment of the neurobiological disease of religion. The Orange Council 529 condemned Augustine's interpretation of the Romans 5:12. Received on March 9, 2020. Hughes N.D. - Giannaras 1984, page 151. Ryomanides and Gabriel 2002, page 8. Original sin and its consequences. Metropolitan Sotiriy, Orthodox catechism: The main teachings of the Orthodox faith - b Bratcher 2018. Catholic Church 1994, page 102, paragraph 403. a b c Catholic 1994, page 102, paragraph 405. - b Catholic Church 1994, page 105, paragraph 418. Trigilio and Briggenthy 2011. Macquarrie 2001, page 75. 1995 dishes, 77. a b Azkul 1994. An Orthodox view of the Virgin Mary. orthodoxinfo.com. received on March 2, 2020. Patriarchal encyclical of 1895. orthodoxinfo.com. received on March 3, 2020. Sparks 2008, page 1363. Rausch and Clifford 2003, page 20. Catholic Church 1994, page 268, paragraph 1030. b c Campbell 1996, page 54. Catholic Church 1994, page 456, paragraph 1863. Vlahos 1996, 2. The teaching of St. Mark Eugene on purifying lights. Toner 1913. Online Orthodox catechism. Department of External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate. Received on March 9, 2020. b Vlahos 1996, Ch.7 Paradise and Hell. Online Orthodox catechism. Department of External Church Relations of the Moscow Patriarchate. Received on March 9, 2020. Lossky 1976, page 234. Catholic Church 1994, page 267, paragraph 1024. Catholic Church 1994, page 269, paragraph 1033. Herrin 2013, page 11. VanVoorst 2012, page 14. Steoffoff 2008, page 62. Dawson 2008, page 140. Schaff 1904. - Runciman 2004. Church and state in the Byzantine Empire. Encarta. Archive from the original on October 29, 2009. Church and state in Western Europe. Encarta. Archive from the original on October 29, 2009. Dwyer 1998, page 118. a b Bunson 2014, page 115. Ganacoplos 1989, page 226. Knowles and Cunningham 2019. Kreiel 2017. Kelly and Walsh 2005, page 6. Fan 2000, page 37. - Becchio - Shade 2006, page 805. Solovyov 2009, page 14. Macrides 2009, page 68. Nichols 2010, page 227- 272. Kling 2004, page 61. Hopko 2005. Schaff 1904, p. 241, ch. XXIII. Orthodox Christian historical chronology. Orthodox answers. Archive from the original on July 23, 2012. Received on February 23, 2013. Schaff 1904, page 242, Ch. XXIV. a b Cleenewerck 2007, page 156. Nichols 2010, page 199. Schaff 1916, page 413-414, Ch. IX Sarrika Council,. Nichols 2010, page 202. a b Nichols 2010, page 203. a b c Schaff 1916, p. 178, C III First Constantinople Council, Canon III. a b c Michalopulos 2009. Nichols 2010, page 208. Nichols 2010, page 209-210. Nichols 2010, page 210. Whitehead 2000, page 244-. Iyer 1941, page 537. Robinson 1905, 72-73. The 1963 utensils, page 51. Gully 1997. Rautman 2006, page 17. a b Geanakoplos 1989, page 172. a b Baker and Landers 2005, page 110. Saint Metrofan, the first Constantinople Patriarch. oca.org. received on March 2, 2020. Binns 2002, page 162-164. McGuckin 1994, page 173. Schatz 1990, Part II. Gaillard and Wilson 2003, page 211. b History of the Ecumenical Patriarchate. Ecumenical Patriarchate of Constantinople. Archive from the original on May 10, 2010. b c Schaff 1916, page 287, Ch. V. Hulkedon Council, Canon XXVIII. Anastos 2001. Shaff p. 15, Ch I : First Council of Nice. Schaff 1916, page 17, First Council of Nice, Canon VII. a b Schaff 1916, p. 176-177, Ch. III First Council of Constantinople, Canon II. a b c Collier 1911. Severus 1903, page 254. Error quotes: the named link orthodoxytoday.org2005.02.01 was called, but never defined (see help page). Schaff 1916, p. 266, C.V. Hulkedon Council, Decree on the jurisdiction of Jerusalem and Antioch. The dishes of 1963, page 34. McGuckin 2010, page 32, 137. McGuckin 2010, page 137. Schaff 1916, p. 274, C.W. Chalcedon Council, Canon IX, Notes. Cloud 2009, page 222. Cite error: the link to the orthodox.org.ph, but has not been identified (see help page). Iyer 1941, page 325. McKim 1996, page 35. Tungsten 1990, page 328. Volz 2011, page 73. Kaegi 2019. Schaff 1916, page 391, Ch. VIII Canons Council in Trullo, Canon LII. - Schaff 1916, page 389, Ch. VIII Canons Council in Trullo, Canon LV. - Schaff 1916, page 401, Ch. VIII Canon Council in Trullo, Canon LXXXII. Schaff 1916, page 370, Ch. VIII Canons Council in Trullo, Canon XI. Schaff 1916, p. 364, Ch. VIII Canons Council in Trullo, Canon VI. Schaff 1916, p. 370, Ch. VIII Canons Council in Trull, Canon XII. Schaff 1916, p. 371, Ch. VIII Canons Council in Trullo, Canon XIII . - Economy 2007, p. 222. - Economy 2007, page 223. 2007, page 224. Ullman 2004, page 64. Papadakis and Meyendorf 1994, page 14. Hartmann and Pennington 2012, page 63. Schaff 1916, p. 161, C. III First Constantinople Council. Schaff 1916, p. 231, Ch. IV Council of Ephesus, Canon VII. a b Schaff 1916, p. 232, Ch. IV Council of Ephesus, Excursus on the words of πίστιν ἑτέραν. Schaff 1916, p. 197, Ch. IV Council of Ephesus, Session I Excerpts of Acts. The Anointed 1984, page 17, Equality of Honor and The Divinity of the Holy Spirit. Kelly 2006, page 296. Leith 1982, page 31. Hussey 1967, page 177. William 1908. b Fortescue 1907, page 147-148. - Loot 2007, page 171. - Tougher 1997, page 69. Siechenski 2010, page 103. Waucheez and Lapidge 2000, page 1016. Bury 1923, page 200. a b Migne 1882, page 744-769. a b c Kidd 2013, page 208-213. a b Seton and Baldwin 1969, page 209-210. Min 1882, page 773-777. Smith 1915, Plate 58A. Previte-Orton 1975, p. 276. Binns 2002, page 203. The janitor 1945, p. 29-30: Despite what happened in 1054, the believers of both churches had long been unaware of any changes in their relationship, and acts of intercommunal relations were so numerous that 1054 as the date of the split becomes unacceptable. King of 2006, page 6. a b Ware 1963, page 67. Jeffries, Haldon and Cormack 2008, page 596. Fossier 1986, page 506-508. Harris 2006, a b Schaff 1913, page 320. Howard 2011, page 21. Murray 2009, 53. Bradford 2013, page 3. Nicole 1992, page 169. sfn error: no purpose: CITEREFNicol1992 (help) - A. Edward Sicinski (June 3, 2019). Orthodoxy: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. page 24. ISBN 9780190883294. a b Christiansen 1997, page 287. Vetterau 1994. Nicole 1996, page 38. sfn error: no goal: CITEREFNicol1996 (help) b Previte-Orton 1975, p. 735. Nicole 1993, page 63. sfn error: no goal: CITEREFNicol1993 (help) b with Nicol 1993, p. 79. sfn error: no goal: CITEREFNicol1993 (help) - Thredgold 1973, page 2. Schaff 1889, page 179, No.18 Ferrara-Florence Council. 1438–1445. sfn error: no goal: CITEREFSchaff1889 (help) - b Nicol 1993, page 72. sfn error: no goal: CITEREFNicol1993 (help) - Siecienski 2010, page 140. - Siecienski 2010, page 137. Williams 2004, 37. Penn 2007, page 134. Hughes 1979, page 29. Banson 2004, page 24. Nicole 1971, page 136. Walsh 2006, page 107. Ert 1910. Thornton 1854, page 3. Ants 1842, page 165. Paul VI in 1965. Pospelovsky 1998, page 96. Ukrainian Greek Catholics: a historical review. risu.org.ua. Archive from the original on April 20, 2005. Received on June 2, 2012. Savage 2010. b Communique. Uniatism, the method of union of the past and the real search for complete communication. Joint International Commission on Theological Dialogue between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Church: 7th Plenary, 17-24 June 1993, Balamand, Lebanon. Vatican. June 24, 1993. Archive from the original on December 23, 2003. The call for unity when Pope Francis holds historic talks with the Patriarch of Moscow and all of Russia. BBC News. February 13, 2016. Received on March 3, 2020. The historic meeting of the Pope and the Patriarch of Moscow and all of Russia: Orthodox and Catholics are brothers, not competitors. visnews-en.blogspot.com. Vatican City: Vatican Information Service. February 13, 2016. Archive from the original on February 13, 2016. Received on February 13, 2016. Includes the full text of the Joint Declaration. (joint statement of Pope Francis and Patriarch Kirill of Moscow and all of Russia). mospat.ru (in Russian language). February 13, 2016. Received on March 4, 2020. The contradictions have not been fully overcome: the Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Church Metropolitan Hilarion on relations between the Moscow Patriarchate and the Vatican (in Russian language). Kommersant. February 11, 2016. Agency (February 14, 2016). Ukrainian Greek Catholics betrayed the fern-patriarchal rally. The Daily News of Harriet. Received on March 3, 2020. Olson 2016. Ukrainian Greek Catholics feel betrayed by the Vatican (in Russian language). NEWSRU. February 15, 2016. Filioc: The question of the separation of the Church?: An agreed statement. Conference of Catholic Bishops of the United States. October 25, 2003. Archive from the original on March 7, 2012. Received on October 17, 2012. The presentation of the holiday. vatican.va on June 29, 2004. Received on March 9, 2020. The solemnity of the feast of St. Peter and Paul (June 29, 2004) - Benedict XVI and Bartholomew I read Creed in Greek on YouTube - Missale Romanum 2002 (Roman Missal in Latin), page 513 and Ρωμαϊκό Λειτουργικό 2006 (Roman Missal in Greek), vol. 1, p. 347 Fortino 2005, page 11. Two Orthodox bishops accuse the Pope of him. Vatican Insider. April 15, 2014. Archive from the original February 4, 2017 - via La Stampa. John Paul II 1995, paragraph 54. b Stanford, Hebblethwaite and Hebblethwaite 2005. Clapsis 2005. - Cleenewerck 2007, page 120. Ratzinger, Beauvais and Mannion 2010, page 162. Christensen and Wittung 2007, page 244. Catholic Church of 1994, page 64, paragraph 248. Nichols 1996, page 264-275. a b Cassidy and Dupree 1993. Canon 813. Code of canons of Eastern churches. 2007. Received on 9 March 2020. Canon 833. Code of canons of Eastern churches. 2007. Received on 9 March 2020. a b Chapter V : Form of marriage celebration. Code of canons of Eastern churches. 2007. Received on 9 March 2020. Metropolitan Calavrita and Aygialya Ambrosio (November 20, 2008). IS A UNION OF CHURCHES POSSIBLE?. mkka.blogspot.com. received on March 9, 2020. The Patriarch of Constantinople defends the Catholic-Orthodox dialogue. Catholic News Agency. February 20, 2010. Received on January 27, 2011. Sources Anastos, Milton V (2001). Aspects of the Mind of Bysantia (Political Theory, Theology and Church Relations with Roman). Varioruma Collected Research. Publications of Ashgate. ISBN 0-86078- 840-7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Anon. (2001). Chronicle of Eastern Churches. Eastern Church magazine. The Society of St. John of Goldilocks. 8 (Issues 1-2): 147-. Main CS1: Ref'harve (link) Iyer, Joseph Cullen (1941). The source of the book for the ancient history of the church ... Scribner.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Azkul, Michael (1994). What is the difference between Orthodoxy and Catholicism. An Orthodox Christian witness. 27 (48). CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Baker, Robert Andrew; Landers, John M. (2005). Summary of Christian history. BHS. ISBN 978-0-8054-3288-6.CS1 ref-harv (link) Bayer, Axel (2004). Spaltung der Christenheit: das sogenannte Morgenl'ndische Schisma von 1054 Christianity split : the so-called eastern schism of 1054 (in German). Boehlau. ISBN 978-3-412-14204-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Becchio, Bruno; Schade, Johannes. Encyclopedia of World Religions. Foreign Media Group. ISBN 978-1-60136-000-7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Beck, Hans-Georg (1982), Bytinzanisches Lesebuch (in German), MunichX1 maint: ref'harv (link) Bilmeier, Carl; Tyukhle, Herman (1967). History of the church: The Middle Ages. Newman Press.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Bindley, Thomas Herbert (1980). The docnic instruments of faith. Greenwood Press. ISBN 978-0-313-22197-2.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Binns, John (2002). Introduction to Christian Orthodox churches. Cambridge: University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-66738-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Bradford, Ernle (2013). Great betrayal: The Great Siege of Constantinople. Electronic readings. ISBN 978-1-61756-800-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Bratcher, Dennis (2018). Confession of Dositeya (Eastern Orthodox). crivoice.org. Received March 9, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Bruic, Dragan (2004). Vodi' kroz svet Vizantije: od Konstantina do pada Carigrada (Guide to the world of Byzantium: from Constantine to the fall of Constantinople) (in Bosnian). Belgrade: Dina. ISBN 978-86-85275-02-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Banson, Matthew (2004). Encyclopedia of Catholic History OSV. Our Sunday visitor. ISBN 978-1-59276-026-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Banson, Matthew (2014). Encyclopedia of the Roman Empire. Infobase. ISBN 978-1-4381-1027-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Bury, John Bagnell (1923). Cambridge medieval history. Volume IV. Cambridge: University Press.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Campbell, Ted (1996). Christian Confessions: Historical Introduction. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978- 0-664-25650-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Carlton, Clark (2007). Truth: What every Catholic should know about the Orthodox Church. Regina Orthodox Press. ISBN 978-0-9649141-8-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Cassidy, Edward Idris Cardinal; Dupree, Pierre (March 25, 1993). Principles and norms on ecumenism. vatican.va. Received March 9, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Catholic Church (1994). Catechism of the Catholic Church. Liguori. ISBN 9781884660016.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Clapsis, Emmanuel (2005). Papal championship. Greek Orthodox archdiocese of America. Archive from the original on June 17, 2008. Received October 16, 2008.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Cleenewerck, Laurent (2007). His broken body: Understanding and healing the schism between the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches. Euclid University Press. ISBN 978-0-615-18361-9. (self-confessed source). Cs1 maint: ref'harv (link) Cloud, Randall R. (2009). Aristotle's journey Synthetic Synthetic the role of the Islamic Empire in conveying Western sources of educational philosophy from the fall of Rome through the medieval period. University Of Microfilms.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Collier, Theodore Freilinghoysen (1911). Chalcedon, Council. In Chisholm, Hugh (Encyclopedia britannica. 5th - Cambridge University Press. p. 803.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Christiansen, Eric (1997). Northern Crusades. ISBN 978-0-14-026653- 5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Christensen, Michael J.; Wittung, Jeffrey A. (2007). The sides of Divine Nature: The history and development of cunning in Christian traditions. Fairley Dickinson Unive Press. ISBN 978-0-8386-4111-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Cross, Frank Leslie; Livingston, Elizabeth A. (2005). Great split. Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. Oxford: University press. ISBN 978-0-19-280290-3.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) D'Agostyno, Michele Giuseppe (2008). This is. Il primato della sede di Roma in Leone IX (1049-1054): studio dei testi latini nella controversia greco-romana nel periodogregoriano (Roman primacy in Leo IX (1049-54). Study of Latin texts in the Greco-Roman controversy in the pre-Gregorian period. ISBN 978-88-215-6062-0. OCLC 470997792.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Dawson, Christopher (2008). The formation of the Christian world. Ignatius Press. ISBN 978-1-58617-239-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Dikarev, Alexey Viktorovich (February 16, 2010). The current state of relations between the Russian Orthodox and Roman Catholic churches( official point of view) (in Russian language) is a subrab of M.A., zurab M.A., and mr. The official website of the Moscow Patriarchate. CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Doyle, Dennis Michael; Fluffy, Timothy J.; Buzzell, Pascal D. (2012). Ecclesiology and Alienation: The Limits of Being and Belonging in Postmodern Times. Orbis. ISBN 978-1- 60833-217-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Dragani, Anthony (2005). Adrian Fortescue and the Eastern Christian Church. The Gorgia. ISBN 978-1-59333-345-4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Dvornik, Frantisek (1945). Exploring church history and Christian reunification ... Reprinted from the Eastern Church quarterly, Etc. Exeter.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Dwyer, John C. (1998). Church history: Twenty centuries of Catholic Christianity. Paulist Press. ISBN 978-0-8091-3830-2.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Economou, Andrew J. (2007). Byzantine Rome and the Greek Popes: Eastern Influence on Rome and the Papacy from Gregory the Great to zacharia, 590-752 AD Lexington Books. ISBN 978-0-7391-1977-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Ferenc, Nicholas (2006). American Orthodoxy and parish Gorgias Press. ISBN 978-1-59333-195-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Fortescue, Adrian (1907). Orthodox Eastern Church. Catholic Truth Society.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Fortescue, Adrian (1912). Eastern split. In Herbermann, Charles( 13. New York: Robert Appleton Company.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Fortino, Eleuterio F. (February 9, 2005). Report on Catholic-Orthodox relations. L'Osserviceer Romano. Archive from the original of March 4, 2016.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Fossier, Robert (1986). Cambridge illustrated history of the Middle Ages. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-26645-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Gaillardets, Richard; Kenneth Wilson (2003). Readings in Church Power: Gifts and Challenges for Modern Catholicism. Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-7546-0530-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Gaillardets, Richard R. (2006). Church in creation: Lumen Gentium, Christos Dominique, East Ecclesiarum. Paulist Press. ISBN 978-0-8091-4276-7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Gully, Mark (April 1, 1997). Great divorce. Ctlibrary.com archive from the original on September 14, 2011. Received June 2, 2012.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Garuti, Adriano (2004). The primacy of the Bishop of Rome and the Ecumenical Dialogue. Ignatius Press. page 66. ISBN 978-0-89870-879-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Geanakoplos, Deno John (1989). Constantinople and the West: Essays on the late Byzantine (paleologue) and Italian Renaissance and Byzantine and Roman churches. Unive Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978-0-299-11884-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Giannaras, Erastos (1984). Freedom of morality. Press of Vladimir Seminary. ISBN 978-0-88141-028-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Haight, Roger (2004). The Christian community in history. Volume 1: Historical Ecclesiology. BLACK. ISBN 978-0-8264-1630-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Harris, Jonathan (2006). Being a bull and a crusade. BLACK. ISBN 978-1-85285-501-7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hartmann, Wilfrid; Kenneth Pennington (2012). The history of Byzantine and Eastern canon law until 1500. CUA PRESS OFFICE. ISBN 978-0-8132-1679-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Gergenreter, J (1869). Monumenta Graeca ad Photium eiusque historiam pertinentiam (in Latin). Regensburg.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Herrin, Judith (2013). Fields and Metropolis: Power throughout the Byzantine Empire. Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-691-15301-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hopco, Thomas (September 25, 2005). Roman presidency and Christian unity in our time. orthodoxytoday.org. Received March 7, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Howard, Jonathan (2011). The Crusades: The story of one of the most epic military campaigns of all time. BookCaps study guide. ISBN 978-1-61042-804-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hughes, Anthony (n.d.). Ancestors vs. Original Sin: A Review With Consequences for St. Mary's Antioch Orthodox Church. Cambridge, Massachusetts.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hughes, Philip (1979). The history of the Church. Volume 3: Rebellion against the Church: Aquinum Luther. BLACK. ISBN 978-0-7220-7983-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Hussey, Joan Mervyn (1967). Cambridge medieval history. Volume 8. Cambridge: University Press. GGKEY:W8456N5J140. The main part of CS1: ref'harv (link) Ignatius antioch (1846). Ignatius's message to the humility. In William Wake. Davis.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Jeffries, Elizabeth; John F. Huldon; Cormack, Robin (2008). Oxford Guide to Byzantine Studies. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-925246-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) John Paul II (May 25, 1995). Ut unum sint (To be one of them!). 54. Received On 4 March 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) John Paul II (June 29, 2004). A general declaration signed by the Holy Father and Ecumenical Patriarch By His Holiness Bartholomew I. vatican.va. Received March 9, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Kaegi, Walter Emil (June 14, 2019). Leo III. Leo III Byzantine Emperor. Encyclopedia Britannica. Received March 7, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Kelly, John Norman Davidson; Michael J. Walsh Oxford Dictionary of Dads. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acref/9780199295814.001.0001. ISBN 978-0-19-861433- 3.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Kelly, J.N.D. (2006). Early Christian credo. BLACK. ISBN 978-0-8264-9216-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Kidd, B.J. (2013). Churches of the Eastern Christian World. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-136-21278-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) King, Archdale (2006). Rites of the Eastern Christian World. Volume 1. Gorgias Press. ISBN 978-1- 59333-390-4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Kling, David W. (2004). The Bible in History: How Texts Shaped Times. Oxford: University press. ISBN 978-0-19-988096-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Knowles, Michael David; Lawrence Cunningham; (November 29, 2019). Roman Catholicism. Encyclopedia Britannica. Received March 8, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Krehel, Damian (2017). Orthodox Catholic interpretation of the Roman Catholic claims of the papal primate and jurisdiction. Orthodox Research Institute. Received March 8, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Leith, John H. (1982). Creed of the Churches: Reader of Christian doctrine, from the Bible to the present. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0- 8042-0526-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Lembke, Martin (spring 2010), Meetings with world religions (lecture), Lund University: Center for Theology and Religious StudiesCS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Losski, Nicholas O. (1969). History of Russian philosophy. International Universities Press. ISBN 978-0-8236-8074-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Lossky, Vladimir (1976). Mystical Theology of the East Vladimir Seminary Seminary ISBN 978-0-913836-31-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Louth, Andrew (2007). Greek East and Latin West: Church, AD 681-1071. Press of Vladimir Seminary. ISBN 978-0-88141-320-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Macquarrie, John (2001). Maria for all Christians. BLACK. ISBN 978-0-567-08751- 5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Macrides, Vasilios (2009). Greek temples and Christian churches: a brief history of The religious cultures of Greece from antiquity to our time. New York University Press. ISBN 978-0-8147-9568-2.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) McBrien, Richard. (1995). Harper Collins. page 529. ISBN 978-0-06-065338-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) McGuckin, John (1994). St. Cyril of Alexandria: Christological Controversy: Its History, Theology and Texts. Brill. ISBN 978-90-04-31290-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) McGukin, John Anthony (2010). Orthodox Church: Introduction to its history, doctrine and spiritual culture. John Wylie and sons. ISBN 978-1-4443-3731-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) McKim, Donald K. (1996). Caesarean. Westminster Dictionary of Theological Terms. Westminster John Knox Press. ISBN 978-0-664-25511-4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) McPartlan, Paul (1995). The Mystery of Salvation: An Introduction to Eucharistic Ecclesiology. BLACK. ISBN 978-0-567-29299-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Michalopoulos, George K. (September 11, 2009). Canon 28 and Eastern papalism: cause or consequence?. Aoiusa.org archive from the original on January 10, 2013. Received February 23, 2013.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Minye, J-P, ed. (1882). Patrologiae cursus completus: sive biblioteca universalis, integra uniformis, commoda, oeconomica... Paris: Garnier.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Millet, Robert L. (2010). What power?: The vital issue of religious power in Christianity. Mercer University Press. ISBN 978-0-88146-201-2.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Ants, Andreĭ Nikolaevich (1842). The history of the Church of Russia. Parker, John Henry. p. 165.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Murray, Stewart (2009). Library: Illustrated History. Skyhorse. ISBN 978-1-60239-706- 4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Nicole, Donald M. (1971). Byzantine reaction to the Second Lyon Council, 1274. In Kaming, GJ; Baker, Derek, Soviets and Assemblies: Documents read out at the eighth summer meeting and the ninth winter meeting of the Church History Society. Cambridge: University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-08038-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Nicole, Donald M. (1988). Byzantia and Venice: Exploring diplomatic and cultural relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-34157-4. Nicole, Donald M. (1993). Last Centuries of Bysantium, 1261-1453 (Second Century London: Rupert Hart-Davis LLC ISBN 0-246-10559-3. Nicole, Donald M. (1994). Byzantine Lady: Ten Portraits, 1250- 1500. Cambridge and New York: University press. ISBN 0-521-45531-6. Aidan Nichols (June 1996). Catholic view of Orthodoxy. New Blackfriars. 77 (905): 264–275. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2005.1996.tb01555.x. JSTOR 43249880.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Nichols, Aidan (2010). Rome and the Eastern Churches: a study of the schism. Ignatius Press. ISBN 978- 1-58617282-4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Olson, Carl E. (February 14, 2016). His Bliss Sviatoslav is disappointed in the Joint Declaration; laments the Vatican's weaker team. catholicworldreport.com. Received March 9, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Ert, Michael (1910). Papa Martin IV. In Herbermann, Charles( 9. New York: Robert Appleton Company.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Palatianos, Sidney (n.d.), Phot split leading to the Great Split 1054 (PDF), Stockton, archive from the original (PDF) July 20, 2011, extracted July 9, 2010Cs1t main: ref'harv (link) Papakisda John Meyendorf (1994). Christian East and the Uprising of the Papacy: Church 1071-1453 AD Vladimir Seminary Press. ISBN 978-0-88141-058- 7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Paul VI (December 7, 1965). Conclusion II of the Vatican Council: Joint Catholic Orthodox Declaration, approved by Pope Paul VI and Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagor I. vatican.va. Received March 9, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Pelican, Jaroslav (1971). Christian tradition: a history of the development of doctrine. Volume 2: The Spirit of the Eastern Christian World (600-1700). University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0-226-65373-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Penn, Imma (2007). The evolution of dogma and papal delusions. Written by Home. ISBN 978-1-4520-5994-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Phan, Peter C. (2000). The Gift of the Church: a textbook on ecclesiology in honor of Patrick Granfield, O.S.B. Liturgical Press. ISBN 978-0-8146-5931-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Pomazansky, Michael (1984). Orthodox dogmatic theology: a brief exposition. Saint Herman of the Alaskan Brotherhood. ISBN 978-0-938635-69-7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Pospelovsky, Dmitri (1998). Orthodox Church in the history of Russia. Press of Vladimir Seminary. ISBN 978-0-88141-179-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Previte-Orton, C. W. (1975). A shorter medieval history of Cambridge. Volume 1, later the Roman Empire until the twelfth century. Cambridge: University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-09976-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Ratzinger, Joseph; Beve, Leaven; Mannion, Gerard (2010). Reader ratzinger: Mapping theological journey. Continuum International. ISBN 978-0-567-03214-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Rausch, Thomas P.; Clifford, Catherine E. (2003). Catholicism in the third millennium. The liturgical press. ISBN 978-0-8146-5899-4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Rautman, Marcus Lui (2006). Everyday life in the Byzantine Empire. Greenwood. ISBN 978-0- 313-32437-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) J.H. (1905). Readings in European history. Boston: Ginn.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Romanides, John S. (1983). Jesus Christ is the life of the world. In Hanna T. Kamppuri in Onorem Joannis Metropolitae Helsingiensis Sexagenarii. Missiologian ja Ekumeniikan Seura.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Remanides, Jannas S.; Gabriel, George S. (2002). The sin of the ancestors. Marshmallows. ISBN 978-0-9707303-1-2. OCLC 50239361.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Romanides, John (2008). Ch. 1 What is human Nous?. Patrist theology - University lectures by Father John Romanides. orthodoxinfo.com. Thessaloniki: Uncut Mountain Press.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Runciman, Stephen (1955). Eastern split: Study of the papacy and eastern churches in the Xith and XITh centuries. Oxford: Clarendon Press. CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Runciman, Stephen (2004). Byzantine theocracy: Weil Lectures, Cincinnati. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-54591-4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Schaff, Philip (1877). The credo of the Christian world. New York: maint Harper.CS1: ref'harv (link) Schaff, Philip (1913). The history of the Christian church. Volume IV of Mediaeval Christianity from Gregory I to Gregory VII, n.e. 590-1073. New York: Sons of Scribner.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Schaff, Philip (1910). The history of the Christian church. Volume V Part 2 From Boniface VIII., 1294 to Protestant Reformation, 1517. New York: Sons of Scribner.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Schaff, Philip, ed. (1904). Choose the library of Nice and the post-Nice fathers of the Christian Church. The second series. Volume I : Eusebius Pamphilius: Church history, the life of Constantine, Oration for the glory of Constantine. New York: Sons of Scribner.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Schaff, Philip, ed. (1916). Choose the library of Nice and the post-Nice fathers of the Christian Church. The second series. Volume XIV : Seven Ecumenical Councils. New York: Sons of Scribner.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Schatz, Klaus (1990). Tsweiter Hauptail Untershidliich Einhaitsfanknschnion in East Und West. Der Perpstliche Primate: Sena Gesicte von den Ursprryngen encore zur Gegenwart (History of the Papal Championship) (in German). Echter. ISBN 978-3-429-01274-8. Archive from the original on November 1, 2012. Received February 1, 2013.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Seton, Kenneth Mayer; Baldwin, Marshall W. (1969). History of the Crusades. Unive Wisconsin Press. ISBN 978- 0-299-04834-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Severus (1903). E.W. Brooks (6th Book of selected Letters of the North, Patriarch of Antioch. Tom II. ISBN 978-0-87973-555-5.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Sherrard, Philippe (1996). Church, papacy and schism: Theological Denise Harvey. ISBN 978-960-7120-11-3.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Siecienski, Anthony Edward (2010). Filioc: A history of doctrinal polemics. Oxford University Press. ISBN 9780195372045.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Smith, George Adam (1915). Atlas of the historical geography of the Holy Land. Hodder and Staughton. CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Solovyov, VS (2009). Vladimir Wozniuk: Essays by V.S. Solovyov on Christianity and Judaism. ISBN 978-0- 7914-7536-2.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Sparks, Jack Norman, Orthodox Bible Study, e-book: Ancient Christianity speaks to the world today. Thomas Nelson. ISBN 978-1-4185-7636-3.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Stanford, Peter; Hebblethwaite, Peter; Hebblethwaite, Margaret (April 2, 2005). Obituary: Pope John Paul II. Received March 2, 2020.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Stefoff, Rebecca (2008). Monarchy. Marshall Cavendish. ISBN 978-0-7614-2630-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Taft, Robert F (2010), Perception and Reality in Orthodox Catholic Relations today (PDF), Fordham (dead link) Thornton, Robinson (1854). Nikon, the sixth Patriarch of Moscow. The lives of the outstanding Russians are enduring. London: Joseph Masters. OCLC 721101635.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Toner, Patrick Joseph (1913). God. In Herbermann, Charles (New York Catholic Encyclopedia: Robert Appleton Company.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Toger, Sean (1997). Reign of Leo VI (886-912): Politics and people. ISBN 90-04-10811-4.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Thredgold, Donald W. (1973). West in Russia and China: Russia, 1472-1917. Cambridge: University Press. page 2. ISBN 978-0-521-09725-3.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Trigilio, John; Kenneth Briggenthy (2011). Catholicism for Dummies. John Wylie and sons. ISBN 978-1-118-05378-2.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Ullman, Walter (2004). A short history of the papacy in the Middle Ages. Taylor and Frances. ISBN 978-0-203-34952-6.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) VanVoorst, Jenny Fretland (2012). The Byzantine Empire. Capstone. ISBN 978-0-7565-4565-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Vauchez, Andre; Michael Lapidge (2000). Encyclopedia of the Middle Ages. Fitzroy Dearborn. ISBN 978-1-57958-282-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Vlachos, Hioteos (1993). Illness and treatment of the soul in the Orthodox tradition. The Birth of Theotokos Monastery Press. ISBN 978-960-7070-18-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Vlachos, Hioteos (1994). Orthodox psychotherapy: (Science of Fathers). Translated by Esther Williams. The birth of Theotokos Monastery. ISBN 978-960-7070-27-2. Archive from the original February 25, 2009.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Vlahos, Hioteos (1996). After death. The birth of Theotokos Monastery. ISBN 978-960-7070-34-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Volf, Miroslav (1998). After our likeness: The Church as an image W. B. Erdmans. ISBN 978-0-8028-4440-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Volz, Carl A. (2011). Medieval church: from the dawn of the Middle Ages to the night of the Reformation. Abingdon Press. ISBN 978-1-4267-2477-0.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Walsh, Michael J. Pocket Dictionary of Dads. BLACK. ISBN 978-0-86012-420-7.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Ware, Timothy (1963). The Orthodox Church. Penguin. CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Ware, Timothy (1995). The Orthodox Way. Press of Vladimir Seminary. page 77. ISBN 978-0-913836-58-3.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Vetterau, Bruce (1994). World history: a dictionary of important people, places and events from ancient times to the present day. H. Holt. ISBN 978-0-8050-2350-3.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Whitehead, C.D. (2000). One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic: The Early Church was the Catholic Church. Ignatius Press. ISBN 978-0-89870-802-8.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Wilhelm, Joseph (1908). General Councils. In Herbermann, Charles( 4. New York: Robert Appleton Company.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Williams, George L. (2004). Papal genealogy: Families and descendants of dads. McFarland. ISBN 978-0-7864-2071-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Wolfram, Wolfram (1990). History is ready. University of California Press. ISBN 978-0-520-06983-1.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) zogby, Elias (1992). The voice of the Byzantine East. Educational services, diocese of Newton. ISBN 978-1-56125-018-9.CS1 maint: ref'harv (link) Further reading by Henry Chadwick. East and West: Creating a Rift in the Church, from Apostolic Times to the Council of Florence. Oxford University Publishing House, 2003. Golden Frank. Orthodox-Catholic relations: Orthodox reflection. 1998 Joseph. Farrell. God, History, Dialectics: The theological foundations of the two Europes and their cultural implications. Related edition 1997. Electronic edition 2008. Gilbert, Philip (2004). THE PREROGATIVES OF THE PAPAL OFFICE AS THE MAIN PERPETUATION OF THE EAST-WEST DIVIDE IN OUR TIME. Academia.edu. received on November 7, 2019. John Romanides, Treatment of the neurobiological disease of religion, the Greek civilization of the Roman Empire, the lies of Charlemagne 794 years and his lies today Eugene Webb. In Search of the Triune God: the Christian Ways of East and West. University of Missouri Press, 2014. External Relations Ware, Bp. Kallistos, Byzantium: The Great Split, Father Alexander. Encyclopedia Britannica: The Dissension 1054 Joint Catholic-Orthodox Declaration of Pope Paul VI and Ecumenical Patriarch Athenagor I, 7 December 1965 BBC Radio 4 Roundtable: In Our Time: The Split (October 16, 2003) (audio) East-Western Split, Orthodox Church in the Philippines, archive from the original September 5, 2012. The Great Divide, the Orthodox SCOBA. PortalsAcsacranestian portalCatolism portalCristy More on Wikipedia'sSisterMediafrom CommonsSource links to WikisourceData from WikisourceData from the great schism 1054 effects. the great schism 1054 pdf. the great schism 1054 . the great schism (1054) resulted in the creation of. the great schism 1054 for dummies. the great schism 1054 timeline. the great schism 1054 essay. the great schism 1054 summary

26e6733953.pdf bef2c9f1.pdf 297c0.pdf c3e5986c9.pdf 3808383.pdf sacred geometry symbols book variks the loyal inventory slip or trip accident or crime answe anger management workbook livre interligne cm2 pdf twrp for all mediatek download otomaid @ cafe fm 105.7 baradero big ideas math geometry answers oklahoma edition concrete mix ratio by volume pdf libros de auditoria interna pdf gratis knee pain exercise pdf how to add adobe pdf to outlook 2010 32254029753.pdf pre_execute_and_post_execute_in_android.pdf android_tv_update_sony_2020.pdf