DOCSLIB.ORG

ACTIVE GEOLOGICAL FAULTS and LAND CHANGE in SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA a Study of the Contribution of Faulting to Relative Subsidenc

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ACTIVE GEOLOGICAL FAULTS and LAND CHANGE in SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA a Study of the Contribution of Faulting to Relative Subsidenc ACTIVE GEOLOGICAL FAULTS AND LAND CHANGE IN SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA A Study of the Contribution of Faulting to Relative Subsidence Rates, Land Loss, and Resulting Effects on Flood Control, Navigation, Hurricane Protection and Coastal Restoration Projects Contract No. DACW 29-00-C-0034 July 2003 Cover: This diagrammatic north-south section, extending from Thibodaux, Louisiana to the Gulf of Mexico, depicts the subsurface geological processes which cause land submergence in Southeastern Louisiana. DISCLAIMER Some of the interpretations and results presented in this report may be controversial. This is to be expected, as the findings challenge a number of conventional concepts and basic assumptions. We recognize the far-reaching implications of these findings, and do not present them lightly. The authors have interpreted the data to the best of their ability, but are not infallible. It is assumed that the research community will rise to the challenge of testing new ideas that depart from convention. The maps and graphics in this report are not intended for zoning, property and insurance evaluations, engineering design, or similar purposes, but rather are intended to display scientific information. Site-specific geotechnical evaluations and risk assessments are recommended for all projects and land use evaluations within the study area ACTIVE GEOLOGICAL FAULTS AND LAND CHANGE IN SOUTHEASTERN LOUISIANA A Study of the Contribution of Faulting to Relative Subsidence Rates, Land Loss, and Resulting Effects on Flood Control, Navigation, Hurricane Protection and Coastal Restoration Projects Prepared by Sherwood M. Gagliano, Ph.D. E. Burton Kemp, III, M.S. Karen M. Wicker, Ph.D. and Kathleen S. Wiltenmuth, M.S., M.S. Coastal Environments, Inc. 1260 Main Street Baton Rouge, LA 70802 Prepared for U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, New Orleans District 7400 Leake Avenue New Orleans, LA 70118 Contract No. DACW 29-00-C-0034 July 2003 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ...........................................................................................................vii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................................................................xix ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................xxi SUMMARY....................................................................................................................xxiii INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................................1 FAULTS AND FAULT EVENTS.......................................................................................6 PREVIOUS RESEARCH..................................................................................................11 SUBSURFACE GEOLOGY .............................................................................................12 QUATERNARY DEPOSITS AND STRUCTURES ........................................................17 Displacement of the Pleistocene ....................................................................................17 Compaction of Holocene Sediments..............................................................................23 SURFACE EXPRESSIONS OF FAULTS ........................................................................24 Description, Evidence, and Mapping of Surface Faults ................................................28 Stream Alignments and Water Body Shapes .................................................................28 Case Studies of Surface Faults...........................................................................................43 SPECIAL STUDY AREAS ...............................................................................................45 Pontchartrain Basin........................................................................................................45 West Plaquemines Delta Plain (Empire and Bastian Bay Faults).............................................................................................................................54 Mudlumps ......................................................................................................................61 Delta Front Gravity Slumping ...................................................................................68 Continental Margin Gravity Slumping ......................................................................68 Middle Barataria Basin ..................................................................................................68 Terrebonne Delta Plain ..................................................................................................73 The Lake Boudreaux Fault (ET-1).............................................................................77 The Montegut Fault (ET-4)........................................................................................77 Isle de St. Jean Charles ..................................................................................................84 Fault severance of Bayou Terrebonne and opening of Lake Barré......................................................................................................................84 Correlation of apparent faults and land loss ..................................................................87 TRIGGERING MECHANISMS .......................................................................................87 Natural System Succession............................................................................................87 Stage 1. Delta Building: Prehistoric Times (Figure 59) ..............................................................................................................................91 Coastal Environments, Inc./20008 Page iii Stage 2. Poised: 1800 A.D. – 1850 A.D. (Figure 60) ..............................................................................................................................93 Stage 3. Early Deterioration: 1850 A.D. – 1900 A.D. (Figure 61).........................................................................................................94 Stage 4. Intermediate Deterioration: 1900 A.D. – 1950 A.D. (Figure 62)................................................................................................96 Stage 5. Advanced Deterioration: 1950 A.D. – 2000 A.D. (Figure 63)..............................................................................................98 Stage 6. Future: 2000 A.D. – 2050 A.D. (Figure 64). .............................................................................................................................99 Summary of Development Sequence.......................................................................101 Earthquakes and Seiches..............................................................................................103 Earthquakes..............................................................................................................103 Vacherie Fault Event (WM – 1)...............................................................................106 Other Reported Earthquakes ....................................................................................108 Seiches and Tsunamis ..............................................................................................109 Salt Water and Gas Migration along Fault Planes .......................................................110 Fluid Withdrawal.........................................................................................................112 VERTICAL AND LATERAL MOVEMENT.................................................................113 Relative Sea Level Rise ...............................................................................................113 Tide Gauge Data ......................................................................................................114 Sequential Land Leveling ........................................................................................120 NASA-Michoud Benchmarks..................................................................................120 Mississippi River Line - Chalmette to Venice.........................................................123 Bayou Lafourche Line .............................................................................................126 Bayou Petite Caillou Line........................................................................................129 Comparison of Mississippi River, Bayou Lafourche and Bayou Petite Caillou Lines................................................................................131 Vertical Movement and Rates of Subsidence and Relative Sea Level Rise for Epoch 2 .......................................................................131 Summary..................................................................................................................131 Other Processes Contributing to Land Loss and Coastal Erosion........................................................................................................138 Reduction of Overbank Flow and Sediment Supply................................................138 Reduction of Organic Matter Build-up and Deterioration of Floating Marshes ...........................................................................139 EFFECTS OF FAULTS...................................................................................................141 Effects on Wetlands .....................................................................................................141
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches Tiffany Roberts University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches Tiffany Roberts University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Geology Commons, and the Geomorphology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Roberts, Tiffany, "Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4216 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches by Tiffany M. Roberts A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Ping Wang, Ph.D. Bogdan P. Onac, Ph.D. Nathaniel Plant, Ph.D. Jack A. Puleo, Ph.D. Julie D. Rosati, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 12, 2012 Keywords: barrier island beaches, beach morphodynamics, beach nourishment, longshore sediment transport, cross-shore sediment transport. Copyright © 2012, Tiffany M. Roberts Dedication To my eternally supportive mother, Darlene, my brother and sister, Trey and Amber, my aunt Pat, and the friends who have been by my side through every challenge and triumph.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast
    Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1328 COVER: Landsat image showing a regional view of the South Texas coastal zone. IUR~AtJ Of ... lt~f<ARY I. liBRARY tPotC Af•a .VAStf. , . ' U. S. BUREAU eF MINES Western Field Operation Center FEB 1919S7 East 360 3rd Ave. IJ.tA~t tETUI~· Spokane, Washington .99~02. m UIIM» S.tratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island­ Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast Edited by GERALD L. SHIDELER A. Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Coastal Complex, South Texas-Introduction and Geologic Framework, by Gerald L. Shideler B. Seismic and Physical Stratigraphy of Late Quaternary Deposits, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Gerald L. Shideler · C. Ostracodes from Late Quaternary Deposits, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Thomas M. Cronin D. Petrology and Diagenesis of Late Quaternary Sands, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Romeo M. Flores and C. William Keighin E. Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Late Quaternary Fine-grained Sediments, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Romeo M. Flores and Gerald L. Shideler U.S. G E 0 L 0 G I CAL SURVEY P R 0 FE S S I 0 N A L p·A PER I 3 2 8 UNrfED S~fA~fES GOVERNMENT PRINTING ·OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1986 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Main entry under title: Stratigraphic studies of a late Quaternary barrier-type coastal complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay area, South Texas Gulf Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Historical Shoreline Changes on Beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui, Hawaii Bradley M
    Journal of Coastal Research 00 0 000–000 West Palm Beach, Florida Month 0000 A Summary of Historical Shoreline Changes on Beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui, Hawaii Bradley M. Romine and Charles H. Fletcher* Department of Geology and Geophysics www.cerf-jcr.org School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology University of Hawaii at Manoa POST Building, Suite 701, 1680 East–West Road Honolulu, HI 96822, USA [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT ROMINE, B.M. and FLETCHER, C.H., 2012. A summary of historical shoreline changes on beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui; Hawaii. Journal of Coastal Research, 00(0), 000–000. West Palm Beach (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Shoreline change was measured along the beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui (Hawaii) using historical shorelines digitized from aerial photographs and survey charts for the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Assessment of Shoreline Change. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive report on shoreline change throughout Hawaii and supplements the limited data on beach changes in carbonate reef–dominated systems. Trends in long-term (early 1900s– present) and short-term (mid-1940s–present) shoreline change were calculated at regular intervals (20 m) along the shore using weighted linear regression. Erosion dominated the shoreline change in Hawaii, with 70% of beaches being erosional (long-term), including 9% (21 km) that was completely lost to erosion (e.g., seawalls), and an average shoreline change rate of 20.11 6 0.01 m/y. Short-term results were somewhat less erosional (63% erosional, average change rate of 20.06 6 0.01 m/y).
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Sand Mining on Beaches in Suriname
    Impacts of sand mining on beaches in Suriname Braamspunt beach, February 2016 Edward J. Anthony Consultant in Geomorphology and Shoreline Management June, 2016. Background p. 3 Abstract p. 4 Summary of recommendations p. 5 Part 1. The environment, context and formation of sandy beaches in Suriname p. 6 1.1. Introduction p. 7 1.2. The Guianas mud-bank system p. 11 1.3. Cheniers and chenier beaches: natural wave-energy buffers and ecosystems p. 15 1.4. Bank and inter-bank phases, and inter-bank chenier development p. 17 1.5. River mouths and chenier development p. 19 1.6. The Suriname Coastal Plain and long-term chenier development p. 22 Part 2. Recent shoreline changes in Suriname: general morphodynamics, methodology and results for Braamspunt beach p. 27 2.1. Chenier morphodynamics – cross-shore and longshore processes p. 28 2.1. The Maroni and Surniname river-mouth contexts and Braamspunt beach p. 33 2.2. Methodology: recent shoreline changes and evolution of Braamspunt beach p. 35 2.2.1. Mesoscale (multi-decadal changes) p. 35 2.2.2. Field surveys of the morphology and dynamics of Braamspunt beach p. 38 2.3. Recent bank and inter-bank phases on the Suriname coast p. 43 2.3.1. The Maroni-Suriname sector p. 44 2.3.2. The Suriname-Coppename sector p. 44 2.3.3. The Coppename-Corantijn sector p. 45 2.4. Morphodynamics of Braamspunt beach p. 45 2.4.1. Offshore and nearshore hydrodynamic conditions p. 45 2.4.2. Grain-size and sedimentology of Braamspunt beach p.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Barriers - D
    COASTAL ZONES AND ESTUARIES – Coastal Barriers - D. M. FitzGerald and I. V. Buynevich COASTAL BARRIERS D. M. FitzGerald and I. V. Buynevich Department of Earth Sciences, Boston University, USA Keywords: barrier, beach, spit, inlet, barrier stratigraphy, barrier evolution Contents 1. Introduction 2. Physical Description 2.1 Beach 2.2 Barrier Interior 2.3 Landward Margin 3. Global Distribution and Tectonic Setting 3.1 General 3.2 Tectonic Controls 3.3 Climatic Controls 4. Barrier Types 4.1 Barrier Spits 4.2 Spit Initiation 4.2.1 Recurved Spits 4.2.2 Cuspate Spits 4.2.3 Flying Spits 4.2.4 Tombolos 4.2.5 Cuspate Forelands 4.3 Welded Barriers 4.4 Barrier Islands 4.4.1 Origin of Barrier Islands 4.4.2 E. de Beaumont 4.4.3 G.K. Gilbert 4.4.4 W.D. McGee 4.4.5 D.W. Johnson 4.4.6 John Hoyt 4.4.7 John Fisher 4.4.8 Recent Barrier Studies 5. BarrierUNESCO Coast Morphology – EOLSS 5.1 Hydrographic Regime and Types of Barrier Coast 5.1.1 Wave-dominatedSAMPLE Coast CHAPTERS 5.1.2 Mixed-Energy Coast 5.1.3 Tide-Dominated Coasts 5.2 Georgia Bight – A Case Study 6. Prograding, Retrograding, and Aggrading Barriers 6.1 Prograding Barriers 6.2 Retrograding Barriers 6.3 Aggrading Barriers 7. Barrier Stratigraphy 7.1 Prograding barrier (regressive stratigraphy) ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) COASTAL ZONES AND ESTUARIES – Coastal Barriers - D. M. FitzGerald and I. V. Buynevich 7.2 Retrograding barrier (transgressive stratigraphy) 7.3 Aggrading barrier stratigraphy Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Barriers occur on a worldwide basis but are predominantly found along Amero-trailing edge continental margins in coastal plain settings where the supply of sand is abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Waves, Shelf Slope and Sediment Characteristics on The
    1 The role of waves, shelf slope and sediment characteristics on the 2 development of erosional chenier plains 1* 2 3 Nardin William and Sergio Fagherazzi 4 1Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge MD 5 USA 21613 6 2Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston MA USA 02215 7 8 *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; 9 Tel.: +1-410-221-8232. 10 11 Abstract 12 Cheniers are sandy ridges parallel to the coast separated by muddy deposits. Here we explore the 13 development of erosional chenier plains, which form by winnowing during storms, through 14 dimensional analysis and numerical results from the morphodynamic model Delft3D-SWAN. Our 15 results show that wave energy and inner-shelf slope play an important role in the formation of erosional 16 chenier plains. In our numerical experiments, waves affect the development of erosional chenier plains 17 in three ways: by winnowing sand in the mudflats, by eroding mud at the shore, and by accumulating 18 sand over the beach during extreme wave events. We further show that different sediment 19 characteristics and wave climates lead to three alternative coastal landscapes: sandy strandplains, 20 mudflats, or the more complex erosional chenier plains. Low inner-shelf slopes are the most favorable 21 for mudflat and chenier plain formation, while high slopes decrease the likelihood of mudflat 22 development and preservation, favoring the formation of strandplains. The presented study shows that 23 erosional cheniers can form only when there is enough sediment availability to counteract wave action 24 and for a specific range of shelf slopes.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Chenier Plain of Cameron Parish, Southwestern Louisiana
    Downloaded from fieldguides.gsapubs.org on May 18, 2015 The Geological Society of America Field Guide 14 2008 Geology of the Chenier Plain of Cameron Parish, southwestern Louisiana Donald E. Owen* Department of Earth and Space Sciences, Lamar University, POB 10031, Beaumont, Texas 77710, USA ABSTRACT The Chenier Plain of southwestern coastal Louisiana is a Holocene strand plain composed of wooded beach ridges (cheniers) and intervening mudfl at grassy wet- lands. The mudfl ats form as prograding tidal fl ats along the open, but low-energy Gulf of Mexico coast; cheniers form from winnowing of sand and shells from the mudfl ats by waves during transgression. Mudfl ats are deposited when a Mississippi River delta lobe is nearby to the east, and cheniers are formed when distributaries switch to a more distant location farther east. All of the cheniers have formed within approximately the past 3000 yr or less and are progressively younger toward the pre- sent coastline. Spits are attached to the cheniers at estuaries; they grow westward in response to the dominant longshore currents. Currently, mudfl ats are prograding in Vermillion Parish to the east, while cheniers form in eastern Cameron Parish along with some regressive beach ridge development in western Cameron Parish. This coast is microtidal with low wave energy. A high rate of subsidence as well as sea-level rise characterizes the Chenier Plain, which is subject to increased wave energy and mud transport every year during many cold-front passages and periodic storm surges associated with tropical cyclones of much lower frequency. Major storm surges can inundate the entire Chenier Plain, wreaking havoc on human settlements.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Pleistocene Bays and Reefs: Ancestors to the Modern Caribbean Coast, Yucata´Npen´Insula, Mexico´ Charles E
    Journal of Coastal Research 32 2 280–285 Coconut Creek, Florida March 2016 Late Pleistocene Bays and Reefs: Ancestors to the Modern Caribbean Coast, Yucata´nPen´ınsula, Mexico´ Charles E. Shaw* Centro Ecologico´ Akumal Akumal 77776, Quintana Roo, Mexico´ [email protected] ABSTRACT Shaw, C.E., 2016. Late Pleistocene bays and reefs: Ancestors to the modern Caribbean coast, Yucata´n Pen´ınsula, Mexico.´ Journal of Coastal Research, 32(2), 280–285. Coconut Creek (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Low-lying indentations along the modern Caribbean coast of the Yucata´n Peninsula host shallow bays with classic crescent-shaped, white-sand beaches. These indentations have previously been explained as products of Holocene dissolution of Pleistocene limestones within a brackish coastal mixing zone. This paper demonstrates that the lows confining the modern bays were formed by sedimentary processes 122,000 6 2000 YBP, during the late Pleistocene. A 50 km stretch of the Caribbean coast between Tankah and Playa del Carmen, here called the high coast, is characterized by rocky headlands that are underlain by fossilized coral reefs of late Pleistocene age and lows between headlands occupied by modern bays. Study of landforms using aerial photographs together with field examination of late Pleistocene calcarenite exposed in quarries has led to recognition of a series of arcuate Pleistocene beaches with large attached spits that developed during a period of falling sea level that followed the oxygen isotope substage 5e sea-level highstand. Pleistocene beaches and associated triangular spits form a series of cuspate arcs, each precisely aligned with one of the modern bays and each triangular spit aligned with the center of a modern headland.
    [Show full text]
  • Geochronology and Landscape Evolution of the Strand-Plain of the Usumacinta and Grijalva Rivers, Southern Mexico
    Accepted Manuscript Geochronology and landscape evolution of the strand-plain of the Usumacinta and Grijalva rivers, southern Mexico Esperanza Muñoz-Salinas, Miguel Castillo, David Sanderson, Tim Kinnaird PII: S0895-9811(17)30269-9 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsames.2017.08.021 Reference: SAMES 1762 To appear in: Journal of South American Earth Sciences Received Date: 3 July 2017 Revised Date: 25 August 2017 Accepted Date: 28 August 2017 Please cite this article as: Muñoz-Salinas, E., Castillo, M., Sanderson, D., Kinnaird, T., Geochronology and landscape evolution of the strand-plain of the Usumacinta and Grijalva rivers, southern Mexico, Journal of South American Earth Sciences (2017), doi: 10.1016/j.jsames.2017.08.021. This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT 1 Geochronology and landscape evolution of the strand-plain of 2 the Usumacinta and Grijalva rivers, southern Mexico 3 4 Esperanza Muñoz-Salinas 1,* , Miguel Castillo 2, David Sanderson 3, Tim Kinnaird 4 5 6 1Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM, Ciudad 7 Universitaria 3000, P.C. 02510, Mexico City, Mexico. Email: [email protected], 8 telephone: +52 (55) (525) 622 4300 Ext. 109 9 10 2Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional MANUSCRIPTAutónoma de México, UNAM, Ciudad 11 Universitaria 3000, P.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Depositional Analysis of a Holocene Carbonate Strand Plain Using High Resolution GPR, Sediment Analysis, and C-14 Dating
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 2019-12-01 Depositional Analysis of a Holocene Carbonate Strand Plain Using High Resolution GPR, Sediment Analysis, and C-14 Dating Kaleb Robert Markert Brigham Young University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Markert, Kaleb Robert, "Depositional Analysis of a Holocene Carbonate Strand Plain Using High Resolution GPR, Sediment Analysis, and C-14 Dating" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 7751. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/7751 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Depositional Analysis of a Holocene Carbonate Strand Plain Using High Resolution GPR, Sediment Analysis, and C-14 Dating Kaleb Robert Markert A thesis submitted to the faculty of Brigham Young University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science John H. McBride, Chair Scott Ritter Sam Hudson Department of Geological Sciences Brigham Young University Copyright © 2019 Kaleb Robert Markert All Rights Reserved ABSTRACT Depositional Analysis of a Holocene Carbonate Strand Plain Using High Resolution GPR, Sediment Analysis, and C-14 Dating Kaleb Robert Markert Department of Geology, BYU Master of Science Understanding modern carbonate depositional systems gives valuable insights into the interpretation of ancient carbonate systems. Ancient carbonate strand plains have the potential to act as productive hydrocarbon reservoirs because of their relatively high porosity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Era of the Columbia River Littoral Cell Is Relatively Young
    HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER LITTORAL CELL George M. Kaminsky1*, Peter Ruggiero2, Maarten Buijsman3, Diana McCandless1, and Guy Gelfenbaum4 To be submitted to: Marine Geology as part of the Special Issue on the Southwest Washington Coastal Erosion Study 1Washington State Department of Ecology, Olympia,WA, USA; [email protected] 2Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA; [email protected] 3 University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA; [email protected] 4U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, CA, USA; [email protected] *Corresponding Author Kaminsky et al., MGSI 1 of 107 9/15/2009 Abstract This paper details the historical coastal evolution of the Columbia River littoral cell in the Pacific Northwest of the United States. Geological data from A.D. 1700 and records leading up to the late 1800s provide insights to the natural system dynamics prior to significant human intervention, most notably jetty construction between 1885 and 1917. All reliable surveys, charts, and aerial photos are used to quantify decadal-scale changes at the three estuary entrances and four sub-cells of the littoral cell. Shoreline, bathymetric, and topographic change over three historical intervals—1870s–1920s, 1920s–1950s, and 1950s–1990s—are integrated to provide an understanding of sediment- sharing relationships among the littoral cell components. Regional morphological change data are developed for alongshore segments of approximately 5 km, enabling comparisons of shoreline change to upper-shoreface and barrier volume change within common compartments. The construction of entrance jetties at the Columbia River (1885–1917) and Grays Harbor (1898–1916) has profoundly affected the evolution of the littoral cell, and has accentuated the morphological coupling between the inlets, ebb-tidal deltas, shorefaces, and barriers.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper Number: 334 Paleo Beach-Ridge Complexes, Indicator of Sea-Level Changes and Climatic Fluctuations: a Case Study from Part of the Andhra Pradesh Coast, India
    Paper Number: 334 Paleo beach-ridge complexes, indicator of sea-level changes and climatic fluctuations: A case study from part of the Andhra Pradesh coast, India. Kar, R.1, Shah, M. B.1, Shaikh, N. H. B.2 and Mujtaba, S.A.I.3 1 Quaternary and Environmental Geology Division, GSI, SR, Hyderabad, [email protected] 2 Marine and Coastal survey Division, Visakhapatnam, 3 OSL lab, GSI, NR, Faridabad The coastal landforms and their responses to sea level and climate changes are significant for geomorphological reconstruction of the coastline and understanding of the coastal dynamics. The Indian coastline stretching over 7,500km is the sixth largest one in the world and has been subject to many spells of sea level changes since Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). The eastern coastline of India has been originated in post Cretaceous times and it was considerably modified during Quaternary due to progradation of deltas and at places by the impacts of glaciations and deglaciation. The present study has been carried out at the central part of the Andhra Pradesh coast to understand the paleoclimatic changes and / or transgression / regression phases along the Andhra Coast during the Quaternary. The area is characterized by >45 km long NE-SW trending curvilinear coast line and a very wide (12km in NE to 5 km in SW), low lying (6m msl) strand plain with coast parallel linear ridges covered by sand dunes with low lying swales/tidal flat as inter ridge area, active dune complex, tidal flat etc. The beach ridges are separated by low-lying swales with subdued topography and at present day both are being modified by anthropogenic activities.
    [Show full text]