DOCSLIB.ORG

Coastal Protection with Respect to Climate Change and a Practical

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coastal Protection with Respect to Climate Change and a Practical Coastal protection with respect to climate change. Practical application on the Belgian coast Trabajo final de Máster Master en transportes, territorio y urbanismo E.T.S. De ing. De caminos, canales y puertos Universitat politecnica de Valencia This master thesis is sumitted to achieve to degree of master of science in Industrial Sciences at KULeuven: industriële wetenschappen Bouwkunde Nicholas Van den Broeck Promotor: Professor Vicent de Esteban Chapapria Academic year 2016-2017 Table of contents List of figures ................................................................................................................................. 4 List of tables .................................................................................................................................. 5 Frequently used parameters ......................................................................................................... 6 Acknowledgements ....................................................................................................................... 7 Abstract ......................................................................................................................................... 8 Resumen ........................................................................................................................................ 9 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 10 2 Coastal landforms................................................................................................................ 13 2.1 Erosional coasts ........................................................................................................... 13 2.1.1 Sea cliffs ............................................................................................................... 13 2.1.2 Headlands and bays ............................................................................................ 14 2.1.3 Sea stacks and arches .......................................................................................... 15 2.2 Depositional coasts ..................................................................................................... 15 2.2.1 Deltas ................................................................................................................... 15 2.2.2 Barrier island/estuarine systems ......................................................................... 18 2.2.3 Strand-plain coasts .............................................................................................. 21 3 Sediment transport ............................................................................................................. 22 3.1 Transport mechanism ................................................................................................. 24 3.1.1 Bedload................................................................................................................ 25 3.1.2 Suspended load ................................................................................................... 27 3.1.3 Wash load ............................................................................................................ 29 3.1.4 Bed ventilation .................................................................................................... 30 3.2 Longshore .................................................................................................................... 32 3.3 Cross-shore .................................................................................................................. 35 4 Different defence mechanisms ........................................................................................... 37 4.1 Hard measures ............................................................................................................ 37 4.1.1 Groynes ............................................................................................................... 37 4.1.2 Seawalls ............................................................................................................... 38 4.1.3 Revetments ......................................................................................................... 42 4.1.4 Gabions ................................................................................................................ 45 4.1.5 Offshore breakwater ........................................................................................... 46 4.1.6 Cliff stabilization .................................................................................................. 49 4.1.7 Entrance training walls ........................................................................................ 54 2 4.2 Soft measures .............................................................................................................. 55 4.2.1 Beach nourishment ............................................................................................. 55 4.2.2 Dune stabilization ................................................................................................ 56 4.2.3 Beach drainage .................................................................................................... 58 4.3 Hard vs soft measures ................................................................................................. 60 5 Climate change .................................................................................................................... 61 5.1 Consequences of climate change ................................................................................ 61 5.1.1 Rise of the ocean’s surface temperature ............................................................ 61 5.1.2 Storm surges ........................................................................................................ 64 5.1.3 Sea level rise ........................................................................................................ 68 5.2 Rise of risk ................................................................................................................... 70 6 Practical application ............................................................................................................ 73 6.1 Introducing the problem ............................................................................................. 73 6.2 Location ....................................................................................................................... 75 6.3 Measures ..................................................................................................................... 76 6.3.1 Beach nourishment ............................................................................................. 77 6.3.2 Seawall ................................................................................................................ 78 6.4 Cost-benefit analysis ................................................................................................... 83 6.4.1 Costs .................................................................................................................... 83 6.4.2 Benefits................................................................................................................ 86 6.4.3 Comparison ......................................................................................................... 87 7 Bibliography ........................................................................................................................ 88 3 List of figures 2. COASTAL LANDFORMS 1 WAVE-CUT NOTCH ........................................................................................................................................ 13 2 WAVE-CUT PLATFORM ................................................................................................................................... 13 3 HEADLAND BAY FORMATION ............................................................................................................................ 14 4 SEA ARCHES AND STACKS ................................................................................................................................ 15 5 DELTA FORMATION ....................................................................................................................................... 16 6 MISSISSIPPI DELTA ........................................................................................................................................ 17 7 TIBER DELTA ................................................................................................................................................ 17 8 NILE DELTA .................................................................................................................................................. 18 9 BARRIER ISLANDS IN THE GULF OF MEXICO ......................................................................................................... 18 10 WADDEN SEA ............................................................................................................................................ 19 11 TIDAL INLET SCHEME.................................................................................................................................... 20 12 STRAND PLAIN, PERU ................................................................................................................................... 21 3. SEDIMENT TRANSPORT
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report
    Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report JUNE 2017 CENTRAL COAST WETLANDS GROUP MOSS LANDING MARINE LABS | 8272 MOSS LANDING RD, MOSS LANDING, CA Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report This page intentionally left blank Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report i Prepared by Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs Technical assistance provided by: ESA Revell Coastal The Nature Conservancy Center for Ocean Solutions Prepared for The County of Santa Cruz Funding Provided by: The California Ocean Protection Council Grant number C0300700 Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report ii Primary Authors: Central Coast Wetlands group Ross Clark Sarah Stoner-Duncan Jason Adelaars Sierra Tobin Kamille Hammerstrom Acknowledgements: California State Ocean Protection Council Abe Doherty Paige Berube Nick Sadrpour Santa Cruz County David Carlson City of Capitola Rich Grunow Coastal Conservation and Research Jim Oakden Science Team David Revell, Revell Coastal Bob Battalio, ESA James Gregory, ESA James Jackson, ESA GIS Layer support AMBAG Santa Cruz County Adapt Monterey Bay Kelly Leo, TNC Sarah Newkirk, TNC Eric Hartge, Center for Ocean Solution Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report iii Contents Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches Tiffany Roberts University of South Florida, [email protected]
    University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School January 2012 Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches Tiffany Roberts University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Geology Commons, and the Geomorphology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Roberts, Tiffany, "Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches" (2012). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/4216 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Natural and Anthropogenic Influences on the Morphodynamics of Sandy and Mixed Sand and Gravel Beaches by Tiffany M. Roberts A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Geology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Ping Wang, Ph.D. Bogdan P. Onac, Ph.D. Nathaniel Plant, Ph.D. Jack A. Puleo, Ph.D. Julie D. Rosati, Ph.D. Date of Approval: July 12, 2012 Keywords: barrier island beaches, beach morphodynamics, beach nourishment, longshore sediment transport, cross-shore sediment transport. Copyright © 2012, Tiffany M. Roberts Dedication To my eternally supportive mother, Darlene, my brother and sister, Trey and Amber, my aunt Pat, and the friends who have been by my side through every challenge and triumph.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast
    Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1328 COVER: Landsat image showing a regional view of the South Texas coastal zone. IUR~AtJ Of ... lt~f<ARY I. liBRARY tPotC Af•a .VAStf. , . ' U. S. BUREAU eF MINES Western Field Operation Center FEB 1919S7 East 360 3rd Ave. IJ.tA~t tETUI~· Spokane, Washington .99~02. m UIIM» S.tratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Barrier-Type Coastal Complex, Mustang Island­ Corpus Christi Bay Area, South Texas Gulf Coast Edited by GERALD L. SHIDELER A. Stratigraphic Studies of a Late Quaternary Coastal Complex, South Texas-Introduction and Geologic Framework, by Gerald L. Shideler B. Seismic and Physical Stratigraphy of Late Quaternary Deposits, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Gerald L. Shideler · C. Ostracodes from Late Quaternary Deposits, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Thomas M. Cronin D. Petrology and Diagenesis of Late Quaternary Sands, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Romeo M. Flores and C. William Keighin E. Geochemistry and Mineralogy of Late Quaternary Fine-grained Sediments, South Texas Coastal Complex, by Romeo M. Flores and Gerald L. Shideler U.S. G E 0 L 0 G I CAL SURVEY P R 0 FE S S I 0 N A L p·A PER I 3 2 8 UNrfED S~fA~fES GOVERNMENT PRINTING ·OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1986 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL HODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Main entry under title: Stratigraphic studies of a late Quaternary barrier-type coastal complex, Mustang Island-Corpus Christi Bay area, South Texas Gulf Coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Ocean Engineering
    May 18, 2020 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/222, 1040 Vienna, Austria URL: http://johndfenton.com/ URL: mailto:[email protected] Abstract This course introduces maritime engineering, encompassing coastal and ocean engineering. It con- centrates on providing an understanding of the many processes at work when the tides, storms and waves interact with the natural and human environments. The course will be a mixture of descrip- tion and theory – it is hoped that by understanding the theory that the practicewillbemadeallthe easier. There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory. Table of Contents References ....................... 2 1. Introduction ..................... 6 1.1 Physical properties of seawater ............. 6 2. Introduction to Oceanography ............... 7 2.1 Ocean currents .................. 7 2.2 El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation ........10 2.3 Indian Ocean Dipole ................12 2.4 Continental shelf flow ................13 3. Tides .......................15 3.1 Introduction ...................15 3.2 Tide generating forces and equilibrium theory ........15 3.3 Dynamic model of tides ...............17 3.4 Harmonic analysis and prediction of tides ..........19 4. Surface gravity waves ..................21 4.1 The equations of fluid mechanics ............21 4.2 Boundary conditions ................28 4.3 The general problem of wave motion ...........29 4.4 Linear wave theory .................30 4.5 Shoaling, refraction and breaking ............44 4.6 Diffraction ...................50 4.7 Nonlinear wave theories ...............51 1 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton 5. The calculation of forces on ocean structures ...........54 5.1 Structural element much smaller than wavelength – drag and inertia forces .....................54 5.2 Structural element comparable with wavelength – diffraction forces ..56 6.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Single-Layer Breakwater Armouring: Feedback on The
    SINGLE-LAYER BREAKWATER ARMOURING: FEEDBACK ON THE ACCROPODE™ TECHNOLOGY FROM SITE EXPERIENCE GIRAUDEL Cyril1, GARCIA Nicolas2, LEDOUX Sébastien3 The single-layer technique appeared at the beginning of the 1980s, with the ACCROPODE™ unit, and is thus entering its third decade. At the time, this solution was a real innovation, reducing the amount of concrete and steepening armour facing slopes, hence reducing the volume of materials required. After three decades in use and more than 200 projects to date, it was important to summarize the lessons learned during this period and to inspect (above and below water) some of these structures in order to assess their behaviour and particularly to confirm the validity of the unit placing rules. In addition to the aspects related to armour stability, the focus has been given to the colonization by marine life of the structures, including the bedding layers, toe berms, underlayer, armour units. The purpose of this paper is to share the experience gained throughout the inspections undertaken since 2010 on structures built more than 10 years ago. A large panel of structures has been inspected, of different ages and at various locations worldwide. Keywords: rubble-mound breakwater; single-layer armouring; ACCROPODE™ units; biodiversity INTRODUCTION The ACCROPODE™ armour unit, well known today, is a plain concrete unit designed to protect the breakwaters, in aiming to reducing considerably the use of material while implementing steeper slopes and a single layer of concrete units (Figure 1). Invented in 1981 thanks to the bases and knowledge acquired with the Tetrapod invented by the same engineering company in 1953, the technology is still currently used and more than 200 applications have been built worldwide.
    [Show full text]
  • Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to Make Recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on Issues Relating to Cliff Stabilization
    DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY PLANNING AND BUILDING INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners VIA: Terry Shannon, County Admini VIA: Thomas Barnett, Director / FROM: Dave Brownlee, Principal Environmental Pla ner DATE: May 7, 2014 SUBJECT: Final Report of the Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee Background: The Cliff Stabilization Advisory Committee was established by the Board of County Commissioners in November 2010. Virginia (Ginger) Haskell, PhD was appointed chairperson. The Committee was charged with responding to the State Steering Committee Report, "Chesapeake Bay Cliff Erosion in Calvert County- and to make recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on issues relating to cliff stabilization. The Committee is made up of residents representing Chesapeake Bay shoreline communities. Discussion: The Committee held monthly public meetings between January 2011 and June 2013. In an effort to educate the Committee and the community, the Committee invited geologists, biologists, engineers, academics and government officials to give presentations at 9 of their meetings. The Committee's final report (attached) has 17 recommendations and includes the response to the State Steering Committee Report (Appendix E). The Committee continued to meet between June 2013 and April 2014 to complete the report. Dr. Haskell will present the report to the Board of County Commissioners on May 13, 2014 (see attached PowerPoint). A list of the Committee members is given on pages 15-16 of the Final Report and on the last slide of the PowerPoint. Conclusion/Recommendation: Recommend that the BOCC review the Final Report and submit the Final Report to Department Heads to get feedback on implementation of the recommendations within the report.
    [Show full text]
  • A Summary of Historical Shoreline Changes on Beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui, Hawaii Bradley M
    Journal of Coastal Research 00 0 000–000 West Palm Beach, Florida Month 0000 A Summary of Historical Shoreline Changes on Beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui, Hawaii Bradley M. Romine and Charles H. Fletcher* Department of Geology and Geophysics www.cerf-jcr.org School of Ocean and Earth Science and Technology University of Hawaii at Manoa POST Building, Suite 701, 1680 East–West Road Honolulu, HI 96822, USA [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT ROMINE, B.M. and FLETCHER, C.H., 2012. A summary of historical shoreline changes on beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui; Hawaii. Journal of Coastal Research, 00(0), 000–000. West Palm Beach (Florida), ISSN 0749-0208. Shoreline change was measured along the beaches of Kauai, Oahu, and Maui (Hawaii) using historical shorelines digitized from aerial photographs and survey charts for the U.S. Geological Survey’s National Assessment of Shoreline Change. To our knowledge, this is the most comprehensive report on shoreline change throughout Hawaii and supplements the limited data on beach changes in carbonate reef–dominated systems. Trends in long-term (early 1900s– present) and short-term (mid-1940s–present) shoreline change were calculated at regular intervals (20 m) along the shore using weighted linear regression. Erosion dominated the shoreline change in Hawaii, with 70% of beaches being erosional (long-term), including 9% (21 km) that was completely lost to erosion (e.g., seawalls), and an average shoreline change rate of 20.11 6 0.01 m/y. Short-term results were somewhat less erosional (63% erosional, average change rate of 20.06 6 0.01 m/y).
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of Sand Mining on Beaches in Suriname
    Impacts of sand mining on beaches in Suriname Braamspunt beach, February 2016 Edward J. Anthony Consultant in Geomorphology and Shoreline Management June, 2016. Background p. 3 Abstract p. 4 Summary of recommendations p. 5 Part 1. The environment, context and formation of sandy beaches in Suriname p. 6 1.1. Introduction p. 7 1.2. The Guianas mud-bank system p. 11 1.3. Cheniers and chenier beaches: natural wave-energy buffers and ecosystems p. 15 1.4. Bank and inter-bank phases, and inter-bank chenier development p. 17 1.5. River mouths and chenier development p. 19 1.6. The Suriname Coastal Plain and long-term chenier development p. 22 Part 2. Recent shoreline changes in Suriname: general morphodynamics, methodology and results for Braamspunt beach p. 27 2.1. Chenier morphodynamics – cross-shore and longshore processes p. 28 2.1. The Maroni and Surniname river-mouth contexts and Braamspunt beach p. 33 2.2. Methodology: recent shoreline changes and evolution of Braamspunt beach p. 35 2.2.1. Mesoscale (multi-decadal changes) p. 35 2.2.2. Field surveys of the morphology and dynamics of Braamspunt beach p. 38 2.3. Recent bank and inter-bank phases on the Suriname coast p. 43 2.3.1. The Maroni-Suriname sector p. 44 2.3.2. The Suriname-Coppename sector p. 44 2.3.3. The Coppename-Corantijn sector p. 45 2.4. Morphodynamics of Braamspunt beach p. 45 2.4.1. Offshore and nearshore hydrodynamic conditions p. 45 2.4.2. Grain-size and sedimentology of Braamspunt beach p.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Barriers - D
    COASTAL ZONES AND ESTUARIES – Coastal Barriers - D. M. FitzGerald and I. V. Buynevich COASTAL BARRIERS D. M. FitzGerald and I. V. Buynevich Department of Earth Sciences, Boston University, USA Keywords: barrier, beach, spit, inlet, barrier stratigraphy, barrier evolution Contents 1. Introduction 2. Physical Description 2.1 Beach 2.2 Barrier Interior 2.3 Landward Margin 3. Global Distribution and Tectonic Setting 3.1 General 3.2 Tectonic Controls 3.3 Climatic Controls 4. Barrier Types 4.1 Barrier Spits 4.2 Spit Initiation 4.2.1 Recurved Spits 4.2.2 Cuspate Spits 4.2.3 Flying Spits 4.2.4 Tombolos 4.2.5 Cuspate Forelands 4.3 Welded Barriers 4.4 Barrier Islands 4.4.1 Origin of Barrier Islands 4.4.2 E. de Beaumont 4.4.3 G.K. Gilbert 4.4.4 W.D. McGee 4.4.5 D.W. Johnson 4.4.6 John Hoyt 4.4.7 John Fisher 4.4.8 Recent Barrier Studies 5. BarrierUNESCO Coast Morphology – EOLSS 5.1 Hydrographic Regime and Types of Barrier Coast 5.1.1 Wave-dominatedSAMPLE Coast CHAPTERS 5.1.2 Mixed-Energy Coast 5.1.3 Tide-Dominated Coasts 5.2 Georgia Bight – A Case Study 6. Prograding, Retrograding, and Aggrading Barriers 6.1 Prograding Barriers 6.2 Retrograding Barriers 6.3 Aggrading Barriers 7. Barrier Stratigraphy 7.1 Prograding barrier (regressive stratigraphy) ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) COASTAL ZONES AND ESTUARIES – Coastal Barriers - D. M. FitzGerald and I. V. Buynevich 7.2 Retrograding barrier (transgressive stratigraphy) 7.3 Aggrading barrier stratigraphy Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketches Summary Barriers occur on a worldwide basis but are predominantly found along Amero-trailing edge continental margins in coastal plain settings where the supply of sand is abundant.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal Management Software to Support the Decision-Makers to Mitigate Coastal Erosion
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Coastal Management Software to Support the Decision-Makers to Mitigate Coastal Erosion Carlos Coelho * , Pedro Narra, Bárbara Marinho and Márcia Lima RISCO & Civil Engineering Department, Aveiro University, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal; [email protected] (P.N.); [email protected] (B.M.); [email protected] (M.L.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 4 December 2019; Accepted: 8 January 2020; Published: 11 January 2020 Abstract: There are no sequential and integrated approaches that include the steps needed to perform an adequate management and planning of the coastal zones to mitigate coastal erosion problems and climate change effects. Important numerical model packs are available for users, but often looking deeply to the physical processes, demanding big computational efforts and focusing on specific problems. Thus, it is important to provide adequate tools to the decision-makers, which can be easily interpreted by populations, promoting discussions of optimal intervention scenarios in medium to long-term horizons. COMASO (coastal management software) intends to fill this gap, presenting a group of tools that can be applied in standalone mode, or in a sequential order. The first tool should map the coastal erosion vulnerability and risk, also including the climate change effects, defining a hierarchy of priorities where coastal defense interventions should be performed, or limiting/constraining some land uses or activities. In the locations identified as priorities, a more detailed analysis should consider the application of shoreline and cross-shore evolution models (second tool), allowing discussing intervention scenarios, in medium to long-term horizons. After the defined scenarios, the design of the intervention should be discussed, both in case of being a hard coastal structure or an artificial nourishment (third type of tools).
    [Show full text]
  • North Sheppey Erosion Study Volume 1: Coastal
    NORTH SHEPPEY EROSION STUDY VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Client: Consultant: Swale Borough Council Engineering Services Swale House, Canterbury City Council East Street, Military Road Sittingbourne, Canterbury, ME10 3HT CT1 1YW OCTOBER 2011 Canterbury City Council Engineering Services 0 LIST OF CONTENTS Page VOLUME 1: COASTAL ADAPTATION STUDY Executive Summary 3 1. Background 4 2. Description of site 6 3. Higher level plans 25 4. Historical and Coastal Evolution 31 5. Geology and Morphology 34 6. Aerial photography 36 7. Lidar Airborne laser scanning 37 8. Historic Ordnance Survey Records 39 9. Parameters 40 10. Management of Coastal Erosion Options 50 11. Do Nothing Scenario 62 12. Economic Appraisal 65 13. Environmental Assessment 67 14. Monitoring and Public Warning 69 15. Consultation 71 16. Recommendations and Implementation 72 References 75 List of Photographs Photo 1- The Leas looking west 7 Photo 2- East End of Minster 11 Photo 3- Minster cliffs and sea defences looking west 14 Photo 4- Fly tipping near Royal Oak Point, cliffs highly vegetated. 15 Photo 5- View from Redcot Caravan Park looking across to Lazy Days park 16 Photo 6- Redcot caravan park 16 Photo 7- Looking West from Ashcroft caravan park 17 Photo 8- Barrows Brook 18 Photo 9- Recent mud run at Ashcroft caravan park 19 Photo 10-Warden Point west of Warden Springs 20 Photo 11- Looking east towards Warden Point 20 Photo 12- Rock armour at Warden Bay revetment looking west 23 Photo 13- Rear scarp of recent slide Cliff Drive, Warden Bay 23 Photo 14- Land slide at Warden Point November 1971 43 Photo 15- Cliff warning sign 70 List of Tables 35 Table 1- Geological Details Table 2- Average Future Erosion for England and Wales 41 Table 3- Historic and predicted future erosion rates 42 Table 4- Recorded land slide history 44 Table 5- Relative sea level rise from UKCP09 47 Table 6- Recommended contingency allowances for net sea level rise PPS25 48 Table 7- Property adaptation, financial options 61 Table 8- Summary of impacts resulting from a do nothing scenario.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Waves, Shelf Slope and Sediment Characteristics on The
    1 The role of waves, shelf slope and sediment characteristics on the 2 development of erosional chenier plains 1* 2 3 Nardin William and Sergio Fagherazzi 4 1Horn Point Laboratory, University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Cambridge MD 5 USA 21613 6 2Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston MA USA 02215 7 8 *Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; 9 Tel.: +1-410-221-8232. 10 11 Abstract 12 Cheniers are sandy ridges parallel to the coast separated by muddy deposits. Here we explore the 13 development of erosional chenier plains, which form by winnowing during storms, through 14 dimensional analysis and numerical results from the morphodynamic model Delft3D-SWAN. Our 15 results show that wave energy and inner-shelf slope play an important role in the formation of erosional 16 chenier plains. In our numerical experiments, waves affect the development of erosional chenier plains 17 in three ways: by winnowing sand in the mudflats, by eroding mud at the shore, and by accumulating 18 sand over the beach during extreme wave events. We further show that different sediment 19 characteristics and wave climates lead to three alternative coastal landscapes: sandy strandplains, 20 mudflats, or the more complex erosional chenier plains. Low inner-shelf slopes are the most favorable 21 for mudflat and chenier plain formation, while high slopes decrease the likelihood of mudflat 22 development and preservation, favoring the formation of strandplains. The presented study shows that 23 erosional cheniers can form only when there is enough sediment availability to counteract wave action 24 and for a specific range of shelf slopes.
    [Show full text]