A Review of X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Review of X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia A Review of X-linked Agammaglobulinemia Maddy Wyburd Word count: 1,836 X-linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) be carriers, which results in a 0.5 probability of is a rare primary immunodeficiency dis- male offspring inheriting the condition. The un- order which impairs the bodies ability to derlying genetics is shown by a punnett square fight infections. It is caused by a mutation in Figure 1. It has been found that only 30-50% on the X chromosome, which inhibits the cases of XLA have been inherited, with the rest production of antibodies. Antibodies are being a result of sporadic mutations [3, 4]. essential in fighting bacterial pathogens and therefore patients with XLA are prone to infections. This review outlines how ge- netic mutation can pass through the sex chromosomes and then goes on to explain the role B cells in our immunity. In XLA the production of B cells is interrupted, here we address how this happens, start- ing at the genetic level and working up to the signalling pathways. X-linked The human DNA is divided up into 23 pairs of chromosomes, one from each parent. The first 22 pairs of chromosomes are autosome, containing the same order of genes as its partner. In women the 23rd chromosome is also an autosome, con- taining two equal length X chromosomes. How- Figure 1: A punnett square showing the in- ever, by definition, the last chromosome in men heritance of XLA. The mutated chromosome is is made up of a X and Y chromosome making an shown in red. Here a female carrier and an homologous chromosome pair [1]. The X chromo- healthy male have a 50% change for having male some contains over 800 genes compared to 63 on offspring with XLA whereas it is not possible for the Y [1]. Therefore for 737 genes there is only the female offspring to inherit the condition. Fe- one copy in male offspring, resulting in any mu- male offspring have a 50% of being a carrier, re- tated genes being expressed. As the XLA muta- sulting in a 25% chance of passing the condition tion is found on the X chromosome and does not onto the next generation. have a Y counterpart, it is far more common in males, affecting approximately 1 in 100,000 men [2]. This mutation is recessive allowing women to 1 A Review of X-linked Agammaglobulinemia Maddy Wyburd Figure 2: The development of B cells. B cells start developing in the bone marrow where they begin to form the BCR. The maturity of these cells depend on the BCR structure. At the pre-B cell stage, light chains are being produced but not yet formed. Immature B cells present the final BCR. Authors own B cells a pathogen which allows our immune system to fight it and remember the successful antibody structure. Patients with XLA are therefore un- The damaged DNA sequence found in XLA tran- able to have live vaccines. The role of Btk in scribes Bruton tyrosine kinases (Btk). This en- antibody production is not trivial. To aid our zyme plays a crucial role in the development of B understanding we first need to study B cell de- cells, a type of white blood cell. Also known as velopment and the structure of antibodies. B lymphocytes, these cells make up part of the human adaptive immune system, which creates an immunological memory after responding to a pathogen [1]. Creating a faster and more effective B cell development neutralisation in future attacks. B cells mature in the bone marrow from stem cells. This pro- B cell differentiation starts in the bone marrow cess creates B cell receptors (BCR) on the sur- and is structured around the development and face of the membrane [5, 6]. These cells then specialisation of the BCR also known as the im- migrate through the blood and into the lymph munoglobulin (Ig) receptor, shown in Figure 2. nodes awaiting activation [7]. Foreign pathogens The BCR is a large Y shape protein made up present specific antigens, usually made up of a of four polypeptide chains; two identical heavy small chain of amino acids. B cells are activated chains (H-chain) and two identical light chains by ligation of the BCR with a complementary (L-chain) [1]. The arrangement of these chains antigen [7]. The B cells can then differentiate creates the active site. Each Ig has two antigen into plasma or memory cells. Plasma cells un- binding sites which are formed by the nitrogen dertake clonal expansion and start releasing anti- terminals of the light and heavy proteins, while bodies, which have the same structure as the spe- the C-terminal on the heavy chain forms the Ig cific BCR, to fight the pathogens. Memory cells tail [1]. are responsible for immunological memory and protect against a secondary infection [7]. Live The chains themselves are made up around 110 vaccines exploit memory cell production, by in- amino acids and can be separated into a variable jecting the body with a controllable amount of (V) and constant (C) region [1]. The variable re- Page 2 A Review of X-linked Agammaglobulinemia Maddy Wyburd Figure 3: Bar chart courtesy of Dingjan et al.. This chart shows the concentration of L chains in pre-B cells when Btk formation is active, Btk+, and when Btk is not active Btk−. It is clear to see that Btk− individuals have significantly less λ L chain than Btk+ gion is found at the N- terminal and therefore is coding for L-chains are ordered and combined responsible for antigen binding. In turn there are with the H-chain to form an Ig molecule [1, 9, five classes of H-chains, α; γ; , µ and δ and two 10]. This checkpoints brings on the third phase classes of L-chains, λ and κ. The arrangement where the new immature B cell present the anti- of these classes allows for 5x1013 unique antigen body on its cell surface which is thought to bind binding sites [1, 9]. Each class is encoded at sep- to ligands, triggering clonal expansion [11]. The arate loci on separate chromosomes [1]. In for- antibody presenting cells then migrate into the mation of the Ig in the bone marrow, a complete lymph nodes where they become activated by an coding sequence for each of the chains and regions antigen [12]. is needed which is assembled by site-specific ge- netic recombination. For H-chains, this requires the correct classes of genes for both V and C re- gions to be rearranged. Once the correct V gene Defects in XLA segment is next to the correct C region it can be co-transcribed resulting in a RNA script. This The gene re-arrangement in pro-B cells and pre-B goes on to produce an mRNA molecule which cells requires complicated downstream signalling codes for the polypeptide chain [1]. pathways. Genetic defects, like in XLA, affect these pathways which has accelerated our study The rearrangement of the L-chain and H-chain of them. The mutation in XLA effects Btk forma- defines the developmental stages of the B-cell and tion. Btk is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase made form the conditions for the biological checkpoints up of 659 amino acids [13, 14]. A kinase protein [9]. In cell cycles checkpoints described the con- is a type of enzyme which catalyses the transfer ditions which must be met before entering the of phosphate groups. Btk plays a crucial part next stage. In the first stage, pro-B cells begin in the signalling pathways in B cells, including to rearrange the H-chain segments and start tran- the maturation of pre-B cells into mature B cells scription, shown in Figure 2 [10]. The creation [4]. XLA patients have significantly less mature of the heavy polypeptide opens entry to the next B cells and therefore antibodies than healthy pa- phase, pre-B cell stage. Here the gene segments tients. The exact pathway of Btk which inhibits Page 3 A Review of X-linked Agammaglobulinemia Maddy Wyburd Figure 4: Adapted from Singh et al.. Signalling pathway of Btk in the B cells. Btk mediated signalling events are regulated by phosphates which are recruited from the cell membrane. The cascade ends in the nucleus, shown by the dotted orange line. Here the genes describing L chain can be rearranged. antibody production was at first difficult to iden- the plasma membrane [8]. This activates Btk tify as the enzyme is involved in so many pro- which can then go on to phosphorylate phos- cesses. However, various experiment have been pholipase C (PLC). The active PLC enzyme carried out in mice to try and detect a mech- then binds and breaks down phosphatidylinos- anism which correlates a decrease of Btk with a itol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) into inositol 1,4,5- lack of antibodies. They found that Btk deficient trisphosphate (IP3) and diacylglycerol (DAG) mouse showed a significant decrease in λ L-chain [5]. IP3 and DAG are secondary messengers proteins [8, 15], shown in Figure 3. A lack of which starts a signalling cascade into the nucleus. the L-chain stops the development at the pre-B Here the genes which define the L-chain are or- cell checkpoint. It now commonly accepted that dered and transcribed. Patients without Btk can- Btk signalling is actively involved in L-chain re- not signal to the nucleus to rearrange the λ L- arrangement and assembly [11]. chain segments resulting in an incomplete BCR and therefore can not pass through the check- The exact signalling pathway between Btk and point.
Recommended publications
  • IDF Patient & Family Handbook
    Immune Deficiency Foundation Patient & Family Handbook for Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases This book contains general medical information which cannot be applied safely to any individual case. Medical knowledge and practice can change rapidly. Therefore, this book should not be used as a substitute for professional medical advice. FIFTH EDITION COPYRIGHT 1987, 1993, 2001, 2007, 2013 IMMUNE DEFICIENCY FOUNDATION Copyright 2013 by Immune Deficiency Foundation, USA. REPRINT 2015 Readers may redistribute this article to other individuals for non-commercial use, provided that the text, html codes, and this notice remain intact and unaltered in any way. The Immune Deficiency Foundation Patient & Family Handbook may not be resold, reprinted or redistributed for compensation of any kind without prior written permission from the Immune Deficiency Foundation. If you have any questions about permission, please contact: Immune Deficiency Foundation, 110 West Road, Suite 300, Towson, MD 21204, USA; or by telephone at 800-296-4433. Immune Deficiency Foundation Patient & Family Handbook for Primary Immunodeficency Diseases 5th Edition This publication has been made possible through a generous grant from Baxalta Incorporated Immune Deficiency Foundation 110 West Road, Suite 300 Towson, MD 21204 800-296-4433 www.primaryimmune.org [email protected] EDITORS R. Michael Blaese, MD, Executive Editor Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Immune Deficiency Foundation Boston Children’s Hospital Towson, MD Boston, MA E. Richard Stiehm, MD M. Elizabeth Younger, CPNP, PhD University of California Los Angeles Johns Hopkins Los Angeles, CA Baltimore, MD CONTRIBUTORS Mark Ballow, MD Joseph Bellanti, MD R. Michael Blaese, MD William Blouin, MSN, ARNP, CPNP State University of New York Georgetown University Hospital Immune Deficiency Foundation Miami Children’s Hospital Buffalo, NY Washington, DC Towson, MD Miami, FL Francisco A.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 Agammaglobulinemia: X-Linked and Autosomal Recessive
    Agammaglobulinemia: X-Linked and Autosomal Recessive Chapter 2 Agammaglobulinemia: X-Linked and Autosomal Recessive The basic defect in both X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia and autosomal recessive agammaglobulinemia is a failure of B-lymphocyte precursors to mature into B-lymphocytes and ultimately plasma cells. Since they lack the cells that are responsible for producing immunoglobulins, these patients have severe deficiencies of all types of immunoglobulins. Definition of X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) and Autosomal Recessive Agammaglobulinemia (ARA) X-Linked Agammaglobulinemia (XLA) was first are not coated with antibody. All of these actions described in 1952 by Dr. Ogden Bruton. This disease, prevent germs from invading body tissues where they sometimes called Bruton’s Agammaglobulinemia or may cause serious infections. (See chapter titled “The Congenital Agammaglobulinemia, was one of the first Immune System and Primary Immunodeficiency immunodeficiency diseases to be identified. XLA is an Diseases.”) inherited immunodeficiency disease in which patients The basic defect in XLA is an inability of the patient to lack the ability to produce antibodies, the proteins that produce antibodies. Antibodies are produced by make up the gamma globulin or immunoglobulin specialized cells in the body, called plasma cells. fraction of blood plasma. Plasma cells develop in an orderly sequence of steps Antibodies are an integral part of the body’s defense beginning with stem cells located in the bone marrow. mechanism against certain types of microorganisms or The stem cells give rise to immature lymphocytes, germs, like bacteria or viruses. Antibodies are important called pro-B-lymphocytes. Pro-B-lymphocytes next in the recovery from infections and protect against develop into pre-B-cells, which then give rise to getting certain infections more than once.
    [Show full text]
  • Practice Parameter for the Diagnosis and Management of Primary Immunodeficiency
    Practice parameter Practice parameter for the diagnosis and management of primary immunodeficiency Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD, David A. Khan, MD, Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD, David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Chief Editor: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Co-Editor: David A. Khan, MD Members of the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters: David I. Bernstein, MD, Joann Blessing-Moore, MD, David Khan, MD, David Lang, MD, Richard A. Nicklas, MD, John Oppenheimer, MD, Jay M. Portnoy, MD, Christopher R. Randolph, MD, Diane Schuller, MD, Sheldon L. Spector, MD, Stephen Tilles, MD, Dana Wallace, MD Primary Immunodeficiency Workgroup: Chairman: Francisco A. Bonilla, MD, PhD Members: Zuhair K. Ballas, MD, Javier Chinen, MD, PhD, Michael M. Frank, MD, Joyce T. Hsu, MD, Michael Keller, MD, Lisa J. Kobrynski, MD, Hirsh D. Komarow, MD, Bruce Mazer, MD, Robert P. Nelson, Jr, MD, Jordan S. Orange, MD, PhD, John M. Routes, MD, William T. Shearer, MD, PhD, Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD, James W. Verbsky, MD, PhD GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, and Aerocrine; has received payment for lectures from Genentech/ These parameters were developed by the Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters, representing Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Merck; and has received research support from Genentech/ the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology; the American College of Novartis and Merck.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Immunodeficiency Disorders
    ALLERGY AND IMMUNOLOGY 00954543 /98 $8.00 + .OO PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCY DISORDERS Robert J. Mamlok, MD Immunodeficiency is a common thought among both patients and physicians when confronted with what is perceived as an excessive num- ber, duration, or severity of infections. Because of this, the starting point for evaluating patients for suspected immunodeficiency is based on what constitutes ”too many infections.” It generally is agreed that children with normal immune systems may have an average of 6 to 8 respiratory tract infections per year for the first decade of life. Even after a pattern of ab- normal infection is established, questions of secondary immunodeficiency should first be raised. The relatively uncommon primary immunodefi- ciency diseases are statistically dwarfed by secondary causes of recurrent infection, such as malnutrition, respiratory allergy, chronic cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal disease, and environmental factors. On the other hand, a dizzying spiral of progress in our understanding of the genetics and immunology of primary immunodeficiency disease has resulted in improved diagnostic and therapeutic tools. Twenty-five newly recognized immunologic disease genes have been cloned in the last 5 ~ears.2~It has become arguably more important than ever for us to recognize the clinical and laboratory features of these relatively uncommon, but increasingly treatable, disorders. CLASSIFICATION The immune system has been classically divided into four separate arms: The B-cell system responsible for antibody formation, the T-cell sys- From the Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Texas Tech University Health Sci- ences Center, Lubbock, Texas PRIMARY CARE VOLUME 25 NUMBER 4 DECEMBER 1998 739 740 MAMLOK tem responsible for immune cellular regulation, the phagocytic (poly- morphonuclear and mononuclear) system and the complement (opsonic) system.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases and with Normal Leukocyte Subpopulations: IMPORTANCE of the TYPE of TARGET
    Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity in Primary Immunodeficiency Diseases and with Normal Leukocyte Subpopulations: IMPORTANCE OF THE TYPE OF TARGET S. Ozden Sanal, Rebecca H. Buckley J Clin Invest. 1978;61(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI108907. To gain insight into a possible role for antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vivo, we examined the ability of leukocytes from 28 patients with primary immunodeficiency and from 20 normal controls to lyse three different types of antibody-coated targets in vitro. Mean cytotoxic indices ±1 SD elicited by unfractionated mononuclear cells from normal controls were 28.74±13.26 for human HLA antibody-coated lymphocyte targets, 42.79±8.27 for rabbit IgG antibody- coated chicken erythrocyte targets, and 47.58±10.34 for human anti-CD (Ripley)-coated O+ erythrocyte targets. Significantly (P=<0.05) lower than normal mean cytotoxic indices against lymphocyte targets were seen with effector cells from 10 patients with X-linked agammaglobulinemia (3.7±4.33), in 10 with common variable agammaglobulinemia (16.05±7.74), in 3 with immunodeficiency with hyper IgM (18.41±4.88), and in 2 with severe combined immunodeficiency (3.94±0.3). Antibody-dependent cytotoxicity against chicken erythrocytes was significantly (P=<0.05) lower than normal only in the common variable agammaglobulinemic group (33.33±12.3) and against human erythrocytes only in the common variable (34.36±9.59) and hyper IgM (27.54±0.66) groups. Rosette and anti-F(ab′)2 depletion studies with normal leukocytes indicated that a nonadherent, nonphagocytic, non-Ig-bearing, non-C receptor-bearing, Fc receptor- bearing lymphocyte was the only effector capable of lysing HLA antiboyd-coated lymphocyte targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Differential Effects of an Immunosuppressive Fraction from Ascites Fluid of Patients with Ovarian Cancer on Spontaneous and Antibody-Dependent Cytotoxicity1
    [CANCER RESEARCH 41, 1133-1139, March 1981] 0008-5472/81 /0041-OOOOS02.00 Differential Effects of an Immunosuppressive Fraction from Ascites Fluid of Patients with Ovarian Cancer on Spontaneous and Antibody-dependent Cytotoxicity1 Alison M. Badger,2 Sue K. Oh, and Frederick R. Moolten Department of Microbiology and the Cancer Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts 02118 ABSTRACT In ADCC, effector (killer) cells bearing receptors for the Fc portion of antibody (FcR) bind to and lyse antibody-coated The ascites fluids from humans with cancer that has me- target cells (36, 45). This mechanism of cell injury has been tastasized to the peritoneum is suppressive of the immune implicated in the immune response to a wide variety of tumors, response both in vitro and in vivo. The active moiety is present allografts, and infectious agents in humans and experimental in a high-molecular-weight fraction which élûtesinthe void animals (5, 8, 11, 17,47). volume of a Sephadex G-200 column. This fraction (designated Our laboratory has carried out a number of studies on the Peak I) has been shown to inhibit a number of in vitro responses immunosuppressive effects of ascites fluids from patients with and will inhibit the antibody response to sheep red blood cells cancer metastatic to the peritoneum. These fluids are inhibitory in vivo. In this report, the Peak I protein fraction from the of a variety of immune responses both in vitro and in vivo. In ascites of patients with ovarian cancer is shown to inhibit this report, we have examined the effect of a high-molecular- spontaneous cytotoxicity of human mononuclear cells against weight fraction isolated from the ascitic fluids of 2 patients with the myeloid cell line K562 and against the T-lymphoid cell line ovarian cancer on the NK and ADCC activity of human periph Molt-4F.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical: Primary Immunodeficiency the IMMUNE SYSTEM
    Problem 7 – Unit 6 – Clinical: Primary immunodeficiency THE IMMUNE SYSTEM - Function: recognizing pathogens (foreign non-self antigens) and organizing a defense response against them by facilitating destruction and elimination. - Lymphoid organs: Primary: Bone marrow: where B-lymphocytes are produced and mature. Thymus: T-lymphocytes which are produced in the bone marrow will migrate to thymus for proliferation and maturation. Secondary (where naïve lymphocytes will get exposed to antigens so they develop specificity): Spleen. Lymph nodes. MALT: Mucosal Associated Lymphoid Tissue (this was explained in anatomy notes). - Monocytes (CD14) & macrophages: They interact with microbes and secrete cytokines (TNF & IL-1). In addition they act as antigen presenting cells (APC): they will ingest pathogens, process and present them to T-cells so these cells can recognize them and be activated. Macrophages are activated by IFN-γ which is produced by TH1 cells so they can kill the microbes. They use complement and antibodies to phagocytose microbes Note: this is known as opsonization where there will be enhancement of phagocytosis by IgG and C3b. - Natural Killer (NK) cells (CD15/CD56): They are produced by lymphoid progenitor cells (which also produce B & T lymphocytes) but they are considered as part of the innate immune system. They kill tumor cells and virus infected cells… HOW? This is mediated by binding of the activation receptor which is present on the surface of NK cells to lectins which are presented on the surface of virus infected cells and tumor cells. Then, killing will be initiated by perforin and granzymes which induce cell apoptosis. - B-lymphocytes (CD9/CD20): They develop and mature in the bone marrow.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Immunodeficiencies MEGAN A
    Primary Immunodeficiencies MEGAN A. COOPER, PH.D., The Ohio State University College of Medicine and Public Health, Columbus, Ohio THOMAS L. POMMERING, D.O., Grant Family Practice Residency, Columbus, Ohio KATALIN KORÁNYI, M.D., Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio Primary immunodeficiencies include a variety of disorders that render patients more susceptible to infections. If left untreated, these infections may be fatal. The disorders O A patient informa- constitute a spectrum of more than 80 innate defects in the body’s immune system. Pri- tion handout on the warning signs of mary immunodeficiencies generally are considered to be relatively uncommon. There primary immunodefi- may be as many as 500,000 cases in the United States, of which about 50,000 cases are ciency, adapted with diagnosed each year. Common primary immunodeficiencies include disorders of permission from a list humoral immunity (affecting B-cell differentiation or antibody production), T-cell of warning signs pre- defects and combined B- and T-cell defects, phagocytic disorders, and complement pared by The Jeffrey Modell Foundation, deficiencies. Major indications of these disorders include multiple infections despite is provided on page aggressive treatment, infections with unusual or opportunistic organisms, failure to 2011. thrive or poor growth, and a positive family history. Early recognition and diagnosis can alter the course of primary immunodeficiencies significantly and have a positive effect on patient outcome. (Am Fam Physician 2003;68:2001-8,2011. Copyright 2003© American Academy of Family Physicians.) urrently, more than 80 primary into subgroups based on the component of the immunodeficiencies are rec- immune system that is affected.
    [Show full text]
  • Infections That Suggest an Immunodeficiency
    INFECTIONS THAT SUGGEST AN IMMUNODEFICIENCY Ricardo U. Sorensen, MD CONTENT OUTLINE 1. Introduction 2. Overview of host defenses 3. Host defenses and infection groups 4. Classification of immunodeficiencies 5. Warning signs of immunodeficiency 6. Infections that suggest an immunodeficiency 7. Infections unlikely to be associated with an immunodeficiency 8. Conditions that may coexist with an immunodeficiency 9. How to target an immune evaluation 10. Infections that suggest: 10.1 Antibody deficiency only 10.2. Combined and cellular immunodeficiencies 10.3. Phagocytic deficiencies only 10.4. Phagocytic and combined immunodeficiencies 10.5. Complement and antibody deficiencies 10.6. Congenital or secondary asplenia 1. INTRODUCTION Normal children have infections that can be considered an integral part of growing up. However, when these infections are recurrent or their severity is disproportionate to the virulence of the offending infectious agent, an immunodeficiency or other predisposing factor must be suspected and sought. In the process of deciding if recurrent or single infections are suggestive of predisposing factors, it is helpful to follow a stepwise method of evaluation: 1. Is the infection “normal” or “pathologic”? 2. If the infection is “pathologic”, it is important to ask the question of why the patient may have these infections: can it be explained by the presence of known risk factors or is an immunologic evaluation indicated? Once it is determined that the infection(s) are “pathologic”, the next step is to decide what component of the immune system needs to be evaluated. This can be done in general by determining if the infections are caused by extracellular or intracellular pathogens and by knowing about special associations between infection phenotypes and immunodeficiency groups or specific immunodeficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Diseases of the Immune System 813
    Chapter 19 | Diseases of the Immune System 813 Chapter 19 Diseases of the Immune System Figure 19.1 Bee stings and other allergens can cause life-threatening, systemic allergic reactions. Sensitive individuals may need to carry an epinephrine auto-injector (e.g., EpiPen) in case of a sting. A bee-sting allergy is an example of an immune response that is harmful to the host rather than protective; epinephrine counteracts the severe drop in blood pressure that can result from the immune response. (credit right: modification of work by Carol Bleistine) Chapter Outline 19.1 Hypersensitivities 19.2 Autoimmune Disorders 19.3 Organ Transplantation and Rejection 19.4 Immunodeficiency 19.5 Cancer Immunobiology and Immunotherapy Introduction An allergic reaction is an immune response to a type of antigen called an allergen. Allergens can be found in many different items, from peanuts and insect stings to latex and some drugs. Unlike other kinds of antigens, allergens are not necessarily associated with pathogenic microbes, and many allergens provoke no immune response at all in most people. Allergic responses vary in severity. Some are mild and localized, like hay fever or hives, but others can result in systemic, life-threatening reactions. Anaphylaxis, for example, is a rapidly developing allergic reaction that can cause a dangerous drop in blood pressure and severe swelling of the throat that may close off the airway. Allergies are just one example of how the immune system—the system normally responsible for preventing disease—can actually cause or mediate disease symptoms. In this chapter, we will further explore allergies and other disorders of the immune system, including hypersensitivity reactions, autoimmune diseases, transplant rejection, and diseases associated with immunodeficiency.
    [Show full text]
  • Fast Facts - Primary Immunodeficiencies
    1 Fast Facts - Primary Immunodeficiencies 1. Primary immunodeficiencies are a group of more than 150 potentially serious disorders that can lead to recurrent infections or swellings. If the infections or swellings are severe these disorders can be life threatening. 2. Primary immunodeficiencies are caused by defects in the genes that control the immune system, and are therefore usually inherited. They are not related to AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) which is due to infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). 3. Whilst many primary immunodeficiencies appear in childhood, some emerge for the first time in adulthood. Research has led to improved therapies that can lead to a better and longer life. However, misdiagnosis or delayed diagnosis in children or adults can result in delayed treatment and complications that may be life threatening. 4. Primary immunodeficiencies can be grouped according to what part of the immune system is affected: Antibody deficiencies – such as Common Variable Immunodeficiency (CVID) Combined immune deficiencies – such as X-linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (SCID) Complement deficiencies – such as C2 Deficiency and Hereditary Angioedema (HAE) Phagocytic cell deficiencies – such as Chronic Granulomatous Disease (CGD) 5. One of the most effective and most commonly used treatments for some primary immunodeficiency diseases is immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IRT) to replace antibody levels. IRT is either injected into the veins using intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) about once a month,
    [Show full text]
  • Ataxia- Telangiectasia
    PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES ATAXIA-TELANGIECTASIA ATAXIA- TELANGIECTASIA 1 PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES ABBREVIATIONS AT Ataxia-telangiectasia IPOPI International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies PID Primary immunodeficiency Primary immunodeficiencies: Ataxia-telangiectasia (1st edition). © International Patient Organisation for Primary Immunodeficiencies (IPOPI), 2020 Published by IPOPI: www.ipopi.org ATAXIA-TELANGIECTASIA INTRODUCTION This booklet explains what ataxia-telangiectasia (AT) is, how it is diagnosed and how it is treated. Ataxia-telangiectasia (AT), sometimes called Louis-Bar syndrome, is a human inborn error of immunity that affects between 1 in 40,000 and 1 in 100,000 live births. The condition is characterised by poor coordination (ataxia) due to degeneration of the cerebellum, abnormal blood vessel formations (telangiectasia), immunodeficiency, radiation (sun) sensitivity and an increased risk for cancer. AT is caused by a mutation in a gene encoding a protein that is involved in coordinating cell signalling in response to DNA damage, and it is classed as an autosomal recessive disorder. This means that two copies of the mutated gene must be present for the AT to develop. The following sections provide an overview of the symptoms and diagnosis of AT, the genetic basis of the disease, how it is managed and how patients can live with the disease. 3 PRIMARY IMMUNODEFICIENCIES WHAT IS ATAXIA-TELANGIECTASIA AT is a genetic neurodegenerative disorder that mostly appears in early childhood. The disorder is characterised by progressively impaired coordination of voluntary movements (ataxia) due to cerebellar degeneration, and some patients develop reddish lesions in the skin and mucous membranes due to abnormal blood vessel formation (telangiectasia).1 This means that people with AT have an unsteady, wobbly gait that gets worse as they get older and dilated, corkscrew-shaped blood vessels on the whites of the eyes and on sun- exposed areas of skin.
    [Show full text]