Electric Cost Optimization for ESP Saves Estimated USD 480,000 For

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Electric Cost Optimization for ESP Saves Estimated USD 480,000 For

TECH REPORT COLOMBIA CARACARA SUR GOR, ft3/bbl [m3/m3] 200 [35,615] Electric Cost Optimization for ESP Saves Estimated Bubblepoint 150 pressure, psi [MPa] [1.03] USD 480,000 for Cepsa Bottomhole 1,200–2,300 pressure, psi [MPa] [8.3–15.9] Lift IQ service obtains real-time data to enable 16% reduction Pump setting 4,000–6,000 in electric costs during field test depth, ft [m] [1,219–1,829] 6,000–8,000 Well depth, ft [m] 18,000 [1,829–2,438] kW.h per month, before optimization kW.h per month, after optimization Using Lift IQ service, Schlumberger 16,000 monitored the ESP operational data for the 14,000 Caracara Sur field, evaluated the statistical Background 12,000 information, and also reviewed production With the current economic climate, the Schlumberger 10,000 trends, surface and downhole variables, well ASLC encouraged Compañía Española de Petróleos 8,000 intervention history, failure cause, and total (Cepsa) to evaluate system operations to increase 6,000 electric cost and consumption. efficiency. The installed ESPs were designed based 4,000 Based on this evaluation, Schlumberger on predicted reservoir and production conditions. 2,000 used DesignPro software and PIPESIM 0 However, at the current stage of production, the ESPs Well 1 Well 2 Well 3 simulator to optimize electric cost for the were encountering 90% water cut with motor load ESPs, reducing electric costs by 16% per of less than 45%, which made them inefficient and month across three wells—an approximate USD 6,951 savings of USD 79,000 per year. Once expensive to run. USD 43,443 Total economic savings per month introduced to the remaining wells, total Technologies USD 36,492 savings are expected to reach USD 480,000. ■ Lift IQ* production life cycle management service This optimization enabled Cepsa to reinvest ■ DesignPro* ESP design software these expenses in other operational areas and improve overall electrical stability ■ PIPESIM* steady-state multiphase flow simulator and infrastructure. Total expenses Total optimized per month expenses per month slb.com/liftiq *Mark of Schlumberger Other company, product, and service names are the properties of their respective owners. Copyright © 2017 Schlumberger. All rights reserved. 16-AL-231815.

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Show Me the Money Middle East Energy and Resources Managing Scarcity for the Future Commodity Prices Have Led to Increased Downstream Costs
Show me the money Middle East Energy and Resources Managing scarcity for the future commodity prices have led to increased downstream costs. Much of this money will be spent on Front End The Gulf states, particularly the UAE, Engineering Design (FEED) work. In addition, although certain large upstream ventures have either been delayed Qatar and Saudi Arabia, plan to award or abandoned, a focus on more difficult and unconventional expl oration activities should spur NOC contracts worth over USD 68bn during capital expenditure levels. Looking ahead to the coming five years, the majority of engineering, procurement and the next five years to raise gas construction (EPC) work will be awarded in Saudi Arabia, production while Iraq is a new focus as contractors follow their client oil companies into the country. The Iraqi opportunity itself is lucrative with the government Opportunities for private sector investment in the expected to award EPC contracts worth more than USD Middle East oil and gas sector 130bn over the course of the next few years. Finally, In recent years there has been an increasing level of sufficient CAPEX outlays are crucial to improving existing federal scrutiny on the strategy of national oil companies gas infrastructure which will help overcome the (NOCs) in the Middle East. Rising global energy projected regional gas shortage. Despite reserves of consumption patterns coupled with rebounding oil 76.18 trillion cubic meters (tcm), or approximately 41% prices have created the ideal opportunity for Middle of total proven reserves3, the Middle East’s share is Eastern governments to increase their treasury intake relatively undeveloped.
[Show full text]
Process Technologies and Projects for Biolpg
energies Review Process Technologies and Projects for BioLPG Eric Johnson Atlantic Consulting, 8136 Gattikon, Switzerland; [email protected]; Tel.: +41-44-772-1079 Received: 8 December 2018; Accepted: 9 January 2019; Published: 15 January 2019 Abstract: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG)—currently consumed at some 300 million tonnes per year—consists of propane, butane, or a mixture of the two. Most of the world’s LPG is fossil, but recently, BioLPG has been commercialized as well. This paper reviews all possible synthesis routes to BioLPG: conventional chemical processes, biological processes, advanced chemical processes, and other. Processes are described, and projects are documented as of early 2018. The paper was compiled through an extensive literature review and a series of interviews with participants and stakeholders. Only one process is already commercial: hydrotreatment of bio-oils. Another, fermentation of sugars, has reached demonstration scale. The process with the largest potential for volume is gaseous conversion and synthesis of two feedstocks, cellulosics or organic wastes. In most cases, BioLPG is produced as a byproduct, i.e., a minor output of a multi-product process. BioLPG’s proportion of output varies according to detailed process design: for example, the advanced chemical processes can produce BioLPG at anywhere from 0–10% of output. All these processes and projects will be of interest to researchers, developers and LPG producers/marketers. Keywords: Liquified petroleum gas (LPG); BioLPG; biofuels; process technologies; alternative fuels 1. Introduction Liquified petroleum gas (LPG) is a major fuel for heating and transport, with a current global market of around 300 million tonnes per year.
[Show full text]
Motor Lubricants Market in Bulgaria
Motor Lubricants Market in Bulgaria a report by SeeNews Competitive Intelligence March 2015 2 Contents 1. Macroeconomic review and business climate in Bulgaria ................................ 4 2. Lubricants market in Bulgaria 2013 - 2014 – market size, structure, trends .. 5 2.1. Legislation – normative acts regulating the lubricants market in Bulgaria .................................. 5 2.1.1. Laws ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1.2. Regulations ............................................................................................................................ 5 2.1.3. Ordinances ............................................................................................................................. 5 2.1.4. National Standards ................................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Main stakeholders ........................................................................................................................ 6 3. Market analysis on the lubricants market in Bulgaria ..................................... 7 3.1. Methodology ................................................................................................................................ 7 3.1.1. Scope of the analysis ............................................................................................................. 7 3.1.2. Major classification bodies ...................................................................................................
[Show full text]
Integrated Oil & Gas Sector Report
EXCERPT ONLY THIS IS NOT A FULL REPORT KEY ISSUES FOR STRATEGIC INVESTORS: Integrated Oil & Gas Securing Access to New Sector Report Reserves Major oil and gas reserves are located in emerging markets, often in politically November 2006 volatile regions or conflict zones. There are associated environmental and social Report prepared by: Christian Meade, Analyst, [email protected]; Doug issues particularly regarding human Morrow, Senior Analyst, [email protected]; Dana Sasarean, Analyst, rights, transparency and the [email protected]; Susan Viets, Director, Research, environment. Failure to manage these [email protected]. For more information on this report or other Innovest reports, issues with upfront risk analysis can please contact Peter Wilkes, Managing Director, [email protected]. result in sunk investments that are either unrecoverable or fail to generate growth Developed Countries Emerging Market Countries 400 at anticipated rates. Similar issues exist in developed countries for growth 350 through the expansion of reserves in 300 ecologically sensitive regions like the Arctic, and growth through non- 250 conventional oil, such as oil sands 200 operations, where the environmental impact is high. Return (%) 150 100 Climate Change Strategies Companies are increasingly operating in 50 a carbon-constrained world owing to 0 tightening regulatory regimes. Exposure AAA AA A BBB BB B CCC to emissions and associated costs varies Rating depending on volume of emissions and the geographic base for operations and Innovest Rating vs. Three Year Total Returns as of September 2006. Innovest sales. For proactive companies energy- believes that as these companies in emerging markets increasingly compete in efficiency and cogeneration lower international markets for access to capital that over the long term they will be at a operating costs; a focus on natural gas disadvantage in comparison with sector leaders, unless they substantially improve as well as renewable fuels and energy their sustainability performance.
[Show full text]
Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas
Climate and Energy Benchmark in Oil and Gas Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 1 Neste 57.4 / 100 8.1 / 20 B 2 Engie 56.9 / 100 7.9 / 20 B 3 Naturgy Energy 44.8 / 100 6.8 / 20 C 4 Eni 43.6 / 100 7.3 / 20 C 5 bp 42.9 / 100 6.0 / 20 C 6 Total 40.7 / 100 6.1 / 20 C 7 Repsol 38.1 / 100 5.0 / 20 C 8 Equinor 37.9 / 100 4.9 / 20 C 9 Galp Energia 36.4 / 100 4.3 / 20 C 10 Royal Dutch Shell 34.3 / 100 3.4 / 20 C 11 ENEOS Holdings 32.4 / 100 2.6 / 20 C 12 Origin Energy 29.3 / 100 7.3 / 20 D 13 Marathon Petroleum Corporation 24.8 / 100 4.4 / 20 D 14 BHP Group 22.1 / 100 4.3 / 20 D 15 Hellenic Petroleum 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D 15 OMV 20.7 / 100 3.7 / 20 D Total score ACT rating Ranking out of 100 performance, narrative and trend 17 MOL Magyar Olajes Gazipari Nyrt 20.2 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 18 Ampol Limited 18.8 / 100 0.9 / 20 D 19 SK Innovation 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 19 YPF 18.6 / 100 2.8 / 20 D 21 Compania Espanola de Petroleos SAU (CEPSA) 17.9 / 100 2.5 / 20 D 22 CPC Corporation, Taiwan 17.6 / 100 2.4 / 20 D 23 Ecopetrol 17.4 / 100 2.3 / 20 D 24 Formosa Petrochemical Corp 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 24 Cosmo Energy Holdings 17.1 / 100 2.2 / 20 D 26 California Resources Corporation 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 26 Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen (PKN Orlen) 16.9 / 100 2.1 / 20 D 28 Reliance Industries 16.7 / 100 1.0 / 20 D 29 Bharat Petroleum Corporation 16.0 / 100 1.7 / 20 D 30 Santos 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 30 Inpex 15.7 / 100 1.6 / 20 D 32 Saras 15.2 / 100 1.4 / 20 D 33 Qatar Petroleum 14.5 / 100 1.1 / 20 D 34 Varo Energy 12.4 / 100
[Show full text]
CEPSA) Streamlines Scheduling Workflows with Integrated Refinery Scheduling and Blending
Compañía Española de Petróleos (CEPSA) Streamlines Scheduling Workflows With Integrated Refinery Scheduling and Blending Case Study “Aspen Petroleum Scheduler and Aspen Reduced quality giveaway Refinery Multi-Blend Optimizer helped streamline our scheduling workflows and provided CEPSA with an accurate representation and prediction of % refinery performance.” - Maria Mateos-Camacho, Planning-Scheduling Department, CEPSA 70 CHALLENGE SOLUTION BENEFITS CESPA wanted to create a solution that Replaced home-grown spreadsheets by • Reduced gaps between planning and would involve various business units in integrating Aspen Petroleum Scheduler™ and scheduling by 90 percent a coordinated way to optimize the global Aspen Refinery Multi-Blend Optimizer™ with • Reduced quality giveaway by 70 percent margin by establishing an integrated Aspen PIMS™ management model. • Reduced demurrage costs by 20 percent Compañía Española de Petróleos, S.A.U. (CEPSA) is an integrated energy company operating at every stage in the oil and gas value chain. Headquartered in Madrid, Spain with more than 10,000 employees, CEPSA is the fourth-largest industrial group in Spain. The company has over 90 years of experience in the development of large-scale projects in different phases of the oil and gas value chain, both nationally and internationally. The company is engaged in petroleum and natural gas exploration and production activities, refining and the transport and sale of crude oil derivatives, petrochemicals, gas and electricity. Thanks to its flexibility and ability to adapt, CEPSA has become a benchmark company in its sector in Spain. The company operates on five continents through progressive internationalization of its activities, with business interests in several European countries as well as Algeria, Brazil, Canada, Colombia, Panama, Peru and Portugal.
[Show full text]
Investor Update May 2018
Investor Update 2018 2016 – 2020 Value & Resilience May© 2018 Disclaimer ALL RIGHTS ARE RESERVED © REPSOL, S.A. 2018 Repsol, S.A. is the exclusive owner of this document. No part of this document may be reproduced (including photocopying), stored, duplicated, copied, distributed or introduced into a retrieval system of any nature or transmitted in any form or by any means without the prior written permission of Repsol, S.A. This document contains statements that Repsol believes constitute forward-looking statements which may include statements regarding the intent, belief, or current expectations of Repsol and its management, including statements with respect to trends affecting Repsol’s financial condition, financial ratios, results of operations, business, strategy, geographic concentration, production volume and reserves, capital expenditures, costs savings, investments and dividend payout policies. These forward-looking statements may also include assumptions regarding future economic and other conditions, such as future crude oil and other prices, refining and marketing margins and exchange rates and are generally identified by the words “expects”, “anticipates”, “forecasts”, “believes”, estimates”, “notices” and similar expressions. These statements are not guarantees of future performance, prices, margins, exchange rates or other events and are subject to material risks, uncertainties, changes and other factors which may be beyond Repsol’s control or may be difficult to predict. Within those risks are those factors and circumstances described in the filings made by Repsol and its affiliates with the Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores and with any other supervisory authority of those markets where the securities issued by Repsol and/or its affiliates are listed.
[Show full text]
2010 Sustainability Reporting of the World's Largest Petroleum Refining
Bharat Petroleum, BP, Caltex Australia, Calumet Specialty Products, Cepsa, Chevron, China National Petroleum, ConocoPhillips,2010 Sustainability Cosmo Reporting Oil, of the CPC, World's CVR Energy,Largest Eni, Petroleum Exxon Refining Mobil, Companies Formosa Petrochemical, Frontier Oil, Galp Energia, Pacific Sustainability Index Scores: A benchmarking tool for online sustainability reporting GS Holdings, Hess, Hindustan Petroleum, Holly, Idemitsu Kosan, Indian Oil, Israel C o r p . , L u k o i l , M a r a t h o n O i l , M o l Hungarian Oil and Gas, Murphy Oil, Neste Oil, Nippon Mining Holdings, Nippon Oil, OMV Group, PDVSA, Petrobras, Petronas, Petroplus Holdings, PKN Orlen Group, PTT, Reliance Industries, Repsol YPF, Rosneft Oil, Royal Dutch Shell, Showa Shell Sekiyu, Sinopec, SK Holdings, S-Oil, Statoil Hydro, Suncor Energy, Sunoco, Tesoro, TNK-BP Holding, Total,United Reﬁning, J.E. Morhardt, Elgeritte Adidjaja, Gracie Beck, Shae Blood, Leah Bross, William Brown, Carolyn Campbell, Jaclyn T. D'Arcy, Whitney Ellen Dawson, V a l e r o E n e r g y , WKaren de e Wolski, s tKaren e Diaz, r Erin n Franks, R Karina e Gomez, ﬁ nAustin i Prentice n g Hallett, Bukola Jimoh, Eric Robert King, Ryan Dean Chas Kristensen, Danielle L. Manning, Allison Scott, Ashley Scott, Aisha Shaikh, Michael Handler Shoemaker, Jennifer Katelyn Ward, and Kathleen West. Contents The Roberts Environmental Center has been the foremost Topics Page analyst of corporate sustainability reporting for over a Company Rankings 3 decade. We analyze corporate online disclosure using our Lead Analyst’s Commentary 4 Pacific Sustainability Index (PSI) and publish the results Carbon Capture and Storage Trends in the 5 online.
[Show full text]
Investing in Oil in the Middle East and North Africa
Report No. 40405-MNA Report No.40405-MNA Report No.Africa inOiltheMiddleEastandNorth Investing 40405-MNA Investing in Oil in the Middle East and North Africa Institutions, Incentives and the National Oil Companies Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized August 2007 Sustainable Development Department Middle East and North Africa Region Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Document of the World Bank Public Disclosure AuthorizedPublic Disclosure Authorized Investing in Oil in the Middle East and North Africa Abbreviations and Acronyms ADNOC Abu Dhabi National Oil Corporation NIORDC National Iranian Oil Refining and Distribution Company Bbl Barrel NOC National Oil Company Bcfd Billion cubic feet per day OAPEC Organization of Arab Petroleum Exporting Countries Bcm Billion Cubic Meters OECD Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development BP British Petroleum OPEC Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries BTU British Thermal Unit PDV Petróleos de Venezuela CEO Chief Executive Officer PEDEC Petroleum Engineering Development Company CNG Compressed Natural Gas PEL Petroleum Economic Limited E&P Exploration and Production PEPA Petroleum Exploration and Production Authority EGPC Egypt Gas Production Company PIW Petroleum Intelligence Weekly EITI Extractive Industry Transparency Initiative PRSP Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper FDI Foreign Direct Investment PSA Production-Sharing Agreement FSU Former Soviet Union QP Qatar Petroleum GCC Gulf Cooperation
[Show full text]
List of IPS Registered Companies (As of May 1, 2019)
List of IPS registered companies (as of May 1, 2019) Accenture Alliani & Bruzzon Anadarko Petroleum Corporation Baker & O'Brien, Inc. Genel Energy Baker Hughes, a GE Company GES‐PETROGAZ Bank of America Merrill Lynch GlobalData Barra Energia Guggenheim Securities, LLC Barrios & Fuentes, Abogados Gulfport Energy BHP Billiton Petroleo Operaciones de Mexico Hess Corporation BHP Billiton Petroleum Holland & Knight Bloem Consultants LLC JAGUAR E&P Blue Bull Energy Japan Oil, Gas and Metals National Corporation BMA Advogados (JOGMEC) BP America Inc. JG Oil & Gas BP Exploration and Production Kinder Morgan, Inc. Bufete Aguirre, Quintanilla, Soria & Nishizawa King & Spalding LLP Soc. Civ. Kosmos Energy Cairn Energy PLC Louisiana State University Law Center Cameroon Ministry of Higher Education Martinez de Hoz & Rueda CEPSA E&P Marval, O'Farrell & Mairal Cheniere Energy, Inc. Mattos Filho, Veiga Filho, Marrey Jr. e Quiroga Chevron Africa & Latin America Exploration & Advogados Production Co. Mayer Brown LLP Chevron Asia South Ltd. McKool Smith Chevron Corporation Mijares, Angoitia, Cortes y Fuentes, S.C. Cinco Energy Management Group Ministry of Energy ‐ Kenya Conoco Phillips Ministry of Mines and Energy, Brazil Data Gumbo Miranda Alliance Business Development LLC DEA Global Limited Miranda Law Firm ENGIE SA Mitrani Caballero & Ruiz Moreno Eni S.p.A. Mitsui Oil Exploration Co., Ltd. ("MOECO") EOG Resources MOL Pakistan Oil & Gas Co. B.V. Epstein Rosenblum Maoz (ERM) Law Office Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP Equinor USA Murphy Oil Corporation Equion Energia Limited Nigerian Petroleum Development Company, ExxonMobil Corporation NPDC ExxonMobil Exploration Company Noble Energy, Inc. ExxonMobil Upstream Business Development Norton Rose Fulbright US MX, S.C. Company Panama Canal Authority EY Peru Park Energy Law FTI Consulting Pas Peru SAC Gaffney, Cline & Associates (GCA) Petroleum Authority of Uganda Gazprom Neft PetroSantander Inc.
[Show full text]
Mena Energy Investment Outlook 2021-2025
MENA ENERGY INVESTMENT OUTLOOK 2021-2025 Overcoming the Pandemic May 2021 MENA ENERGY INVESTMENT OUTLOOK 2021-2025 Overcoming the Pandemic May 2021 Authored by: Dr. Leila R. Benali Former Chief Economist (2019-2021) Ramy Al-Ashmawy Senior Energy Specialist Suhail Z. Shatila Senior Energy Specialist Disclaimer The views expressed in this publication are the views of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of APICORP itself or its shareholders. The views expressed reflect the current views of the authors as of the date of publication, and neither the authors nor APICORP undertake to advise of any changes in the views expressed. The contents of this work are intended for general informational purposes only and are not intended to constitute legal, securities, or investment advice, an opinion regarding the appropriateness of any investment, or a solicitation of any type. About APICORP The Arab Petroleum Investments Corporation (APICORP) is a multilateral development financial institution established in 1975 by an international treaty between the ten Arab oil exporting countries. It aims to support and foster the development of the Arab world’s energy sector and petroleum industries. APICORP makes equity investments and provides project finance, trade finance, advisory and research, and its headquarters is in Dammam, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. APICORP is rated ‘Aa2’ with stable outlook by Moody’s and ‘AA’ with a stable outlook by Fitch. Contents I. Executive Summary 4 II. Path to Economic Recovery: 9 1. How will the Global and MENA Economies Fare? 9 i. Global Economy: Common Trends and Diverging Recovery Paths 9 ii. Developments of Global Oil Prices 10 iii.
[Show full text]
Shell Espana/ Cepsa/ Sis Jv
EN Case No COMP/ M.3275 - SHELL ESPANA/ CEPSA/ SIS JV Only the English text is available and authentic. REGULATION (EC) No 139/2004 MERGER PROCEDURE Article 7(3) Date: 14.09.2004 COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Brussels, 14.09.2004 PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 7(3) DECISION To the notifying party: Dear Madame/ Sir, Subject: Derogation pursuant to Article 7.3 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 139/2004 Case No COMP/M.3275 - Shell España/ Cepsa/ SIS JV I. BACKGROUND 1. We refer to the application for a derogation from the suspension obligations provided for in Article 7(1) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 139/2004 (the Merger Regulation) submitted by Shell España, S.A. (part of the Royal Dutch/Shell group of companies, “Shell”) and Compañía Española de Petróleos, S.A. (“Cepsa”) on 10 September 2004. The parties are requesting a derogation from the suspension of the implementation of a concentration in respect of the proposed acquisition of joint control of a newly created company, Spanish Into-plane Services, S.L. (“SIS”). II. THE PARTIES AND THE TRANSACTION 2. Shell España is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Royal Dutch/Shell Group. It is a Spanish limited liability company with its corporate seat in Madrid. Shell España is active mainly in the production, distribution and sale of motor, aviation, marine and domestic fuels, bitumen and lubricants and has had concessions to provide into-plane services at both Madrid (now expired) and Barcelona airports. 3. Cepsa is a listed company in the Spanish Stock Exchange Market, and is active across the energy sector, with a wide range of activities related to the extraction and refining of oil, and the production and commercialisation of all kinds of oil derivatives (fuels, jet fuel, bitumen, lubricants and petrochemical products, such as plastics, synthetic fibres and detergents), the distribution of natural gas and the production and distribution of electricity.
[Show full text]