Morphologic and Climatic Controls on Soil Evolution

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Morphologic and Climatic Controls on Soil Evolution MORPHOLOGIC AND CLIMATIC CONTROLS ON SOIL EVOLUTION IN THE BITTERROOT AND SAPPHIRE MOUNTAINS, MONTANA by Sarah Sarojini Benjaram A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Earth Sciences MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY Bozeman, Montana April 2017 ©COPYRIGHT by Sarah Sarojini Benjaram 2017 All Rights Reserved ii DEDICATION I would like to thank my advisor, Dr. Jean Dixon, for her guidance in carrying out this project and writing this thesis. Thank you for your good example and your patience. Thanks to my committee members, Dr. Tony Hartshorn and Dr. Dave Mogk, for their input on my project. Tony, thanks especially for visiting me in the field during the summer. I am grateful to George Furniss for his hospitality in letting me stay at his beautiful place in the Bitterroots. I couldn’t have managed such a long field trip without taking breaks at the little house. Thanks to Dr. Andrew Wilcox for his insight, advice and support. Thanks to Sam Shelafo, Darrell Schwartz, and Aaron Feldhaus for helping me out in the field and Karsten Lorentz for help in the lab. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 Intent of this MS Thesis .......................................................................................1 Background ..........................................................................................................1 Thesis Format and Outline ...................................................................................7 References Cited ..................................................................................................9 2. MORPHOLOGIC AND CLIMATIC CONTROLS ON SOIL EVOLUTION IN THE BITTERROOT AND SAPPHIRE MOUNTAINS ....................................16 Introduction ........................................................................................................16 Legacies of Past Climate on Landscape Morphology ....................................16 Landscape Morphology and Soil Cover ........................................................19 Implications of Bedrock Exposure for Chemical Weathering .......................22 Study Area .........................................................................................................25 Tectonic History .............................................................................................26 Climate History ..............................................................................................29 Topography and Geomorphology of the Bitterroot and Sapphire Mtns ........30 Approach and Methods ......................................................................................32 Topographic Analysis ....................................................................................35 Field Methods and Sampling .........................................................................37 Analysis of Land Cover Distribution .............................................................39 Analysis of Chemical Weathering Extent ......................................................42 Results ................................................................................................................46 Topographic Variability Across Study Catchments.......................................46 Soil Cover and Thickness ..............................................................................52 Chemical Weathering Intensity ......................................................................52 Discussion ..........................................................................................................56 Assessing the Glacial Imprint on the Landscape ...........................................56 Interpretation of Soil Cover Distribution and Geochemistry .........................59 The Influence of Modern Climate on Soil Evolution ....................................63 Effect of Lithology on Catchment Characteristics .........................................64 Conclusions ........................................................................................................66 References Cited ................................................................................................70 3. SUMMARY ........................................................................................................83 iv TABLE OF CONTENTS – CONTINUED APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………………...85 APPENDIX A: Calibration of the Rock Exposure Index ......................................86 APPENDIX B: Sample Field Data ........................................................................90 APPENDIX C: Sample GIS-Derived Data ............................................................93 APPENDIX D: Elemental Composition of Field Samples from XRF ..................96 APPENDIX E: Calculated CDFs and Mass Transfer Coefficients .......................99 APPENDIX F: Notes on the Utilization of Cosmogenic Nuclides......................101 APPENDIX G: Literature Review .......................................................................108 APPENDIX H: Detailed Sampling Methods .......................................................137 APPENDIX I: Distribution of Land Cover Type with Slope Gradient ...............140 v LIST OF TABLES Table Page 2.1. Mean elevation and slope of 11 study catchments .....................................49 2.2. Hypsometric integrals of 11 study catchments ...........................................49 2.3. CDFs and taus of surface samples in Lost Horse and Rye .........................55 2.4. Variation in slope gradient by lithology in the Sapphires ..........................55 2.5. Variation in slope gradient by lithology in the Sapphires ..........................66 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1.1. Illustration of contrasting landscapes ...........................................................4 1.2. Concept sketch ..............................................................................................8 2.1. Idealized slope-elevation distributions of fluvial and glacial landscapes ...19 2.2. Location map ..............................................................................................26 2.3. Geologic maps ............................................................................................34 2.4. String grid used for estimating soil cover ...................................................39 2.5. Estimation of soil and rock cover from remotely sensed data ....................42 2.6. Comparison of Ti and Zr for use as immobile element ..............................45 2.7. Elevation and slope histograms ..................................................................47 2.8. Slope versus elevation of 11 catchments ....................................................48 2.9. Hypsometric integral versus catchment area ..............................................48 2.10. Basin slopes binned by elevation ..............................................................51 2.11. Soil thickness, CDF, and tau histograms ..................................................53 vii ABSTRACT To what extent is chemical weathering governed by a landscape’s topography? Two neighboring mountain ranges in the northern Rockies of western Montana, USA, provide an ideal natural laboratory in which to investigate the relationship between soil chemical weathering, persistence of soil cover, and topography. We also examine the connection between the topography and climate history. The mountain ranges we explore are the previously glaciated Bitterroot Mountains, which consist of steep, rock-dominated hillslopes, and the neighboring unglaciated Sapphire Mountains which display convex, soil-mantled hillslopes. Soil thickness measurements, soil and rock geochemistry, and digital terrain analysis reveal that soils in the rock-dominated Bitterroot Mountains are less thoroughly weathered than those in the Sapphire Mountains. These differences are even greater when we adjust weathering for rock fragments and consider surface weathering intensity at a landscape scale using our newly developed metric, the rock- adjusted chemical depletion fraction (RACDF) and rock-adjusted mass transfer coefficient (RAτ). The Bitterroots overall are 30% less weathered than the Sapphires despite higher mean annual precipitation in the former, with an average RACDF of 0.38 in the postglacial Bitterroots catchment and 0.61 in the nonglacial Sapphire catchment, suggesting that 38% of rock mass is lost in the conversion to soil in the Bitterroots, whereas 61% of rock mass is lost in the nonglaciated Sapphires. Though we find little evidence for modern climate influence on weathering, data suggest that precipitation may influence slope thresholds for soil cover. Forested soils persist on slopes that are 5° higher in the Bitterroots than the Sapphires (25° and 20° respectively), based on land cover data. Because the previously glaciated Bitterroots are less weathered despite being wetter, we conclude that the glacial history of this landscape exerts more influence on soil chemical weathering than does modern climate. However, while previous studies have correlated weathering intensity with topographic parameters such as slope gradient, we find little topographic indication of specific controls on weathering in these complex systems. 1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Intent of this MS Thesis Significant advancement has been made in our understanding of the controls on soil development and chemical
Recommended publications
  • Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana
    Porphyry and Other Molybdenum Deposits of Idaho and Montana Joseph E. Worthington Idaho Geological Survey University of Idaho Technical Report 07-3 Moscow, Idaho ISBN 1-55765-515-4 CONTENTS Introduction ................................................................................................ 1 Molybdenum Vein Deposits ...................................................................... 2 Tertiary Molybdenum Deposits ................................................................. 2 Little Falls—1 ............................................................................. 3 CUMO—2 .................................................................................. 3 Red Mountain Prospect—45 ...................................................... 3 Rocky Bar District—43 .............................................................. 3 West Eight Mile—37 .................................................................. 3 Devil’s Creek Prospect—46 ....................................................... 3 Walton—8 .................................................................................. 4 Ima—3 ........................................................................................ 4 Liver Peak (a.k.a. Goat Creek)—4 ............................................. 4 Bald Butte—5 ............................................................................. 5 Big Ben—6 ................................................................................. 6 Emigrant Gulch—7 ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Montana Forest Insect and Disease Conditions and Program Highlights
    R1-16-17 03/20/2016 Forest Service Northern Region Montata Department of Natural Resources and Conservation Forestry Division In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form. To request a copy of the complaint form, call (866) 632-9992. Submit your completed form or letter to USDA by: (1) mail: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ecoregions of Idaho
    1 0 . C o l u m b i a P l a t e a u 1 3 . C e n t r a l B a s i n a n d R a n g e Ecoregion 10 is an arid grassland and sagebrush steppe that is surrounded by moister, predominantly forested, mountainous ecoregions. It is Ecoregion 13 is internally-drained and composed of north-trending, fault-block ranges and intervening, drier basins. It is vast and includes parts underlain by thick basalt. In the east, where precipitation is greater, deep loess soils have been extensively cultivated for wheat. of Nevada, Utah, California, and Idaho. In Idaho, sagebrush grassland, saltbush–greasewood, mountain brush, and woodland occur; forests are absent unlike in the cooler, wetter, more rugged Ecoregion 19. Grazing is widespread. Cropland is less common than in Ecoregions 12 and 80. Ecoregions of Idaho The unforested hills and plateaus of the Dissected Loess Uplands ecoregion are cut by the canyons of Ecoregion 10l and are disjunct. 10f Pure grasslands dominate lower elevations. Mountain brush grows on higher, moister sites. Grazing and farming have eliminated The arid Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins ecoregion is nearly flat, internally-drained, and has light-colored alkaline soils that are Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 52 regions Literature Cited: much of the original plant cover. Nevertheless, Ecoregion 10f is not as suited to farming as Ecoregions 10h and 10j because it has thinner soils.
    [Show full text]
  • 6800-Year Vegetation and Fire History in the Bitterroot Mountain Range Montana
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1995 6800-year vegetation and fire history in the Bitterroot Mountain Range Montana Anne Elizabeth Karsian The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Karsian, Anne Elizabeth, "6800-year vegetation and fire history in the Bitterroot Mountain Range Montana" (1995). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 6683. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/6683 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Anne- K a r s j a n i Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY TheM University ontana of Permission is granted by tlie author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that tliis material is used for scholarly purposes and is properly cited in published works and repoits. * * Please check "Yes'' or “No “ and provide signature Yes, I grant permission ..\1 No, I do not grant permission ----- Author’s Signature Date; ' n 1 Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with ^he author’s explicit consent. ■ Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. A 6800-YEAR VEGETATION AND FIRE HISTORY IN THE BITTERROOT MOUNTAIN RANGE, MONTANA By ANNE ELIZABETH KARSIAN Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSHY OF MONTANA Department of Forestry 1995 Approved by: t' z o Chairperson 7 ^ ^ ^ /.
    [Show full text]
  • Ekstrom's L Diamond E Ranch
    Ekstrom’s L Diamond E Ranch Clinton, MT 83 ± Acres $750,000 | 76 ± Acres | Land Only $795,000 | 7 ± Acres | Homestead 708 N. Rouse Bozeman, MT (406) 589-4160 westernranchbrokers.com If you’ve heard the water over rocks, if you’ve seen the Salmon Fly hatch, if you’ve set eyes on the verdant John Long and Sapphire Mountains then you already know. Homesteaded over 100 years ago by the Elliott family, the L Diamond E Ranch represents one of the last parcels of this size with this proximity to the Rock Creek area. The Blue Ribbon fishery of Rock Creek and the adjacent Clark Fork River both possess unparalleled beauty and unmatched fishing. Along with the elk, moose, and deer habitat this area represents a special place for outdoor enthusiasts. Fishing on nearby Rock Creek Rock Creek © 2019 Western Ranch Brokers || [email protected] ~2~ Summary The famed “L Diamond E Ranch” is a 83± acre historic homestead located near the Clark Fork and legendary Rock Creek, just outside of Missoula, MT. This renowned property comes complete with a spring creek, ponds, and irrigated hay fields. The historic barn, home as well as two cabins are well known for providing a comfortable base for travelers, guides, fishermen, and adventurers alike. This strategic location creates an excellent opportunity for commercial use as base for your own outfitting and lodging operation, real estate development opportunit, and/or private retreat. All water rights convey. Hunting and fishing outfitter permits also available. © 2019 Western Ranch Brokers || [email protected] ~3~ © 2019 Western Ranch Brokers || [email protected] ~4~ Location Located less than 30 minutes east of Missoula the L Diamond E is located at the exit for Rock Creek Road off Interstate 90 near the confluence of Rock Creek and the Clark Fork River.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys
    Birding in the Missoula and Bitterroot Valleys Five Valleys and Bitterroot Audubon Society Chapters are grassroots volunteer organizations of Montana Audubon and the National Audubon Society. We promote understanding, respect, and enjoyment of birds and the natural world through education, habitat protection, and environmental advocacy. Five Valleys Bitterroot Audubon Society Audubon Society P.O. Box 8425 P.O. Box 326 Missoula, MT 59807 Hamilton, MT 59840 www.fvaudubon.org/ www.bitterrootaudubonorg/ Montana Audubon P.O. Box 595 Helena, MT 59624 406-443-3949 www.mtaudubon.org Status W Sp Su F Bird Species of West-central Montana (most vagrants excluded) _ Harlequin Duck B r r r Relative abundance in suitable habitat by season are: _ Long-tailed Duck t r r c - common to abundant, usually found on every visit in _ Surf Scoter t r r r moderate to large numbers _ White-winged Scoter t r r r u - uncommon, usually present in low numbers but may be _ Common Goldeneye B c c c c _ missed Barrow’s Goldeneye B u c c c _ o - occasional, seen only a few times during the season, not Bufflehead B o c u c _ Hooded Merganser B o c c c present in all suitable habitat _ Common Merganser B c c c c r - rare, one to low numbers occur but not every year _ Red-breasted Merganser t o o _ Status: Ruddy Duck B c c c _ Osprey B c c c B - Direct evidence of breeding _ Bald Eagle B c c c c b - Indirect evidence of breeding _ Northern Harrier B u c c c t - No evidence of breeding _ Sharp-shinned Hawk B u u u u _ Cooper’s Hawk B u u u u Season of occurrence: _ Northern Goshawk B u u u u W - Winter, mid-November to mid-February _ Swainson’s Hawk B u u u Sp - Spring, mid-February to mid-May _ Red-tailed Hawk B c c c c Su - Summer, mid-May to mid-August _ Ferruginous Hawk t r r r F - Fall, mid-August to mid-November _ Rough-legged Hawk t c c c _ Golden Eagle B u u u u This list follows the seventh edition of the AOU check-list.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Winter Recreation on Wildlife of the Greater Yellowstone Area: a Literature Review and Assessment
    EFFECTS OF WINTER RECREATION ON WILDLIFE OF THE GREATER YELLOWSTONE AREA: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Greater Yellowstone Winter Wildlife Working Group Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee October 1999 DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE EFFECTS OF WINTER RECREATION ON WILDLIFE OF THE GREATER YELLOWSTONE AREA: A LITERATURE REVIEW AND ASSESSMENT Greater Yellowstone Winter Wildlife Working Group October 1999 Suggested citation: Olliff, T., K. Legg, and B. Kaeding, editors. 1999. Effects of winter recreation on wildlife of the Greater Yellowstone Area: a literature review and assessment. Report to the Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee. Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming. 315 pages. Editors: Tom Olliff, Kristin Legg, and Beth Kaeding Layout: Tami Blackford Cover photo courtesy of the National Park Service. CONTENTS PREFACE ........................................................... v BIRDS Bald eagles (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ........................................ vii J. T. Stangl ...................................... 103 Trumpeter swans (Cygnus buccinator) CONTRIBUTORS ................................................. ix Tom Olliff ....................................... 113 REVIEWERS ...................................................... xi HABITAT Effects of recreation on vegetation INTRODUCTION J. T. Stangl ...................................... 119 Tom Olliff ................................................. 1 ISSUES MAMMALS Effects of development on wildlife Bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis) Wendy Clark
    [Show full text]
  • Level IV Ecoregions of Montana
    DRAFT 2 Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing the spatial differences in the capacities and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the environment by its Ecoregions of Montana probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999). These general purpose regions are critical for Second Edition structuring and implementing ecosystem management strategies across federal agencies, state agencies, and nongovernment organizations that are responsible for different types of resources within the same 116° 115° 114° 113° 112° 111° 110° 109° 108° 107° 106° 105° 104° geographical areas (Omernik and others, 2000). ° 49° The approach used to compile this map is based on the premise that ecological regions can be identified 49 BRITISH COLUMBIA 42d through the analysis of the spatial patterns and the composition of biotic and abiotic phenomena that affect ALBERTA SASKATCHEWAN 42k or reflect differences in ecosystem quality and integrity (Wiken, 1986; Omernik, 1987, 1995). These 15d CANADA 15h 41b 42q 42n sa 17r ATE S phenomena include geology, physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology. u F 41a 42l UNITED ST n l Plentywood a a 42n 42r 42m Scobey c th 42r o e The relative importance of each characteristic varies from one ecological region to another regardless of o a 42r K d R e i 42r 17r the hierarchical level. A Roman numeral hierarchical scheme has been adopted for different levels of k v a 41c e r Fresno 15h L 42i 42b 42d ecological regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Survey
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BULLETIN OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY No. 17O t, WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1900 UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SUKVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DIRECTOR SURVEY OF THE BOUNDARY LINE BETWEEN IDAHO AND MONTANA FROM THE INTERNATIONAL BOUNDARY TO THE CREST OF THE BITTERROOT MOUNTAINS BY RICHARD TJRQUHART GOODE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1900 CONTENTS. Page. Letter of transmittal - _. .... _..._......_....--..,.. ........... 9 Instructions ...............................1...^.......................... 11 Boundary lines.-. ....--..........---.-.--..-.-..-............-.-.-..---- 15 Account of operations ...........................-._._........... .--. 18 Latitude, longitude, base line, azimuth, and triangulation _...__.._.._..___ 21 Latitude _...-. .--.---.-... -.....-..-..........._................ 21 Longitude.........---.-..-..-..-.....-..--.. ............. ....-.-. 23 Spokane base line................J......................__._._.. 25 Azimuth .__.---.--.-.-.....___.. _..--...__.__.__.. ._._........--. 25 Triangulation ................... __........._.'......._._._.....-- 29 Transit and stadia work.................................................. 40 Monuments _. ..;......____.._._.,_._._._....__,, ._.....__. ..-..... 47 The international boundary west of the summit of the Eocky Mountains, and the Mooyie Trail monument..............................._..... 58 Financial statement ................... °........................_.i........ 63 Index ..............J.....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lanners Ontana
    Please Thank Our Sponsors MONTANA ASSOCIATION OF PLANNERS Planning in a Natural Resources State Conference Program 2014 MAP Conference September 15th -17th Hamilton, Montana 24 Notes Welcome to Ravalli County! 2014-2015 Montana Association of Ravalli County is a beautiful valley sandwiched Planners Board Members between the Sapphire Mountains to the East and the Bitterroot Mountains to the West. It is Charity Fechter referred to as the Bitterroot Valley. Madison County Planning Dept - Chair Ravalli County was created by the Montana Leg- Wyeth Friday islature in 1893 and named after Antony Ravalli, Billings-Yellowstone County Plan- a priest who arrived in the valley in 1845 and ning Dept. started the St. Mary’s Mission. The Mission, near the town of Stevensville, was the first per- Janet Cornish manent white settlement in Montana. Community Development Services of Montana, Butte - Treasurer The town of Hamilton was founded by Marcus Daly, one of the “Copper Kings” and founder of Brian Bender the Anaconda Copper Company. Hamilton was Powell County Planning Dept - Sec- named after his employee James Hamilton, who retary platted the town in 1890. Christopher Scott Gallatin County Planning Dept The Bitterroot Valley has been predominately an agricultural and timber economy with retire- Allison Mouch ment and tourism becoming prominent in re- Planning Bureau Chief, MT Dept of cent years. It is also home to The Rocky Moun- Commerce tain Lab. The Lab is a Biosafety Level 4 Labora- tory which was constructed in 1928 as a result Andrew Hagemeier of research begun around 1900 to study Rocky Community Planner, Land Solutions Mountain spotted fever.
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land
    Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land Map of the Curlew Mine by Rick Schmidt in MBMG mineral property files Open-File Report MBMG 484 Phyllis A. Hargrave Catherine McDonald Michael D. Kerschen John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 Abandoned-Inactive Mines on Bitterroot National Forest-Administered Land Open-File Report MBMG 484 October 2003 Phyllis A. Hargrave Catherine McDonald Michael D. Kerschen John J. Metesh Robert Wintergerst Prepared for the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service-Region 1 CONTENTS Page LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................... iii LIST OF TABLES ............................................................ iii 1.0 INTRODUCTION ..........................................................1 1.1 Project Objectives ....................................................1 1.2 Abandoned and Inactive Mines Defined . 2 1.3 Health and Environmental Problems at Mines . 2 1.3.1 Acid Mine Drainage ...........................................3 1.3.2 Solubilities of Selected Metals ...................................3 1.3.3 The Use of pH and SC to Identify Problems . 5 1.4 Methodology ........................................................5 1.4.1 Data Sources .................................................5 1.4.2 Pre-Field Screening............................................6 1.4.3 Field Screening ...............................................7 1.4.4 Field Methods ................................................8
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado Glacier National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Report Glacier National Park Geologic Resource Evaluation Geologic Resources Division Denver, Colorado U.S. Department of the Interior Washington, DC Table of Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................. iv Executive Summary ...................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 3 Purpose of the Geologic Resource Evaluation Program ............................................................................................3 Geologic Setting .........................................................................................................................................................3 Glacial Setting ............................................................................................................................................................4 Geologic Issues............................................................................................................. 9 Economic Resources..................................................................................................................................................9 Mining Issues..............................................................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]