DOCSLIB.ORG

Maya Biosphere Reserve

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

BEST OF THE WILD: WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY and the MAYA BIOSPHERE RESERVE BEST OF THE WILD: WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY and the MAYA BIOSPHERE RESERVE PHOTO CREDITS (COUNTER-CLOCKWISE FROM LEFT): COVER: JULIE LARSEN MAHER/WCS; INSIDE COVER: WCS GUATEMALA; PAGE 3: WCS GUATEMALA; PAGE 4; WCS GUATEMALA; PAGE 5: WCS GUATEMALA (2); CEMEC/WCS; PAGE 7: WCS GUATEMALA (3); PAGE 9: RAFAEL REYNA; WCS GUATEMALA (2); PAGE 11: WCS GUATEMALA; JULIE LARSEN MAHER/WCS; WCS GUATEMALA; CEMEC/WCS; PAGE 13: VICTOR HUGO RAMOS, WCS GUATEMALA W C S a n d t h E M a y a B I o S p h ere R eser v E Viewed from space the Maya Biosphere Reserve (MBR) appears largely pristine, with minimal evidence of human impact. It is one of the last remaining rainforest strongholds in the region, situated at the heart of the Selva Maya, a tri- national forest spanning Guatemala, Belize and Mexico. The MBR is a stronghold for wide ranging and iconic species—jaguar, puma, Baird’s tapir, white-lipped peccary, scarlet macaw, and king vulture. Species endemic to the region fill the forest: the raucous Guatemalan black howler monkey, Morelet’s croco- dile, and the spectacular ocellated turkey. Millions of migratory birds from the US and Canada, more than 80 species, depend on these forests during the northern winter. At 8,100 square miles (nearly one-sixth the size of New York State), the MBR anchors the largest block of broadleaf forest north of the Amazon. Securing its future is an impor- tant conservation imperative. The forest is a major carbon sink for the planet and a critical water catchment for the region. The reserve provides Guatemala with 90% of its petroleum and timber. And the area was the epicenter of the Maya civilization—its 200 archaeological sites are a power- ful international draw for a lucrative and growing tourism industry. Though Guatemala is embracing democracy and is slowly recovering from decades of internal conflict, the MBR still lacks the institutions needed to govern the use of its natural assets. Illegal settlements, unsustainable rural land uses, uncontrolled hunting of wildlife and annual burning have severely degraded much of the western third of the reserve, and resulted in a vast loss of economic opportunities for local people. The Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) is partnering with local organizations and government to integrate conservation and development in the MBR. Over the last 20 years we have developed innovative approaches to improve local governance of natural and cultural resources and resist destructive practices. We have supported the efforts Inside cover: Scarlet macaw nesting of local people to manage their forests, which has reduced the threats of deforestation habitat in the Maya Biosphere and fire, and ensured that the habitat for jaguars and scarlet macaws, and a host of other Reserve Landscape. Right, from magnificent species, remains intact. top and counterclockwise: WCS has the knowledge, long-standing presence, experience, and a vision for the Eastern MBR aerial view; WCS coming decade: forested parks teeming with wildlife and a managed landscape where area of focus, including human fire is controlled and resource extraction is legal and sustainable. impacts in the MBR (least With conservation leadership, scientific knowledge and field presence from WCS, human impact = green; we can together conserve this magnificent landscape. greatest impact = red). 2 MEXICO Mirador - Rio Azul Dos Lagunas Laguna Laguna del Zona de Uso Múltiple Reserva del Tigre Tigre-Río de Biosfera Maya Escondido San El Pilar Miguel la Tikal Palotada Yaxhá Sierra del Zona de Amortiguamiento Reserva El Zotz de Biosfera Maya Nakúm Lancadon Naranjo GUATEMALA MEXICO BELIZE Site Scale Reference National park Biotope Buffer zone New York, USA Multiple use zone Cultural monument 0 25 50 100 International boundary (Background shade represents topography) 0 100 200 400 Kilometers Kilometers 3 UNDERSTANDING THE CHALLENGES AND RISKS The western reaches of the MBR, particularly Laguna del Tigre and Sierra del Lacandon National Parks, are under severe threat. Illegal colonization is rapidly moving west to east, resulting in forest clearing, uncontrolled hunting of wildlife and fire. At the industrial scale, roads built to facilitate timber and petroleum extraction provide easy avenues for hunters and new colonists into remote sections of the forest. Fire is the principal agent of forest degra- dation. Colonists clear small patches of forest and use fire to burn off the organic debris and create nutrient rich ash. During El Niño years, the fires spread into the surrounding forest, furthering and widening the destruc- tion. In 2002, the resulting smoke traveled north in such density that the Houston International Airport was closed. Dry years are becoming increasingly common—a pre- diction of climate change scientists—suggesting that fire will become a more severe threat in the future. Conserving the Maya Forest will attain the twin goals of biodiversity conservation and sustainable economic development. Planned land-use and zoning allow ecotour- ism development, sustainable forest extraction and biodiversity protection to co-exist within the same landscape. Management authority for specific areas is conferred to local communities, national NGOs or government agencies (See Zoning Map, previ- Left, Uncontrolled hunting— ous page). jaguar killed by poacher. In this Yet management authorities lack sufficient skills, experience and financial resources case, the poacher was caught by to effectively govern use of the region’s resources and respond to the growing threats. the community patrol and expelled Concurrently, the Guatemalan Government is limited in its ability to respond to biodi- from the village. Right, from top versity conservation goals due to the overwhelming social needs of the country. and counter-clockwise: Aerial view The eastern MBR is still primarily intact, though is increasingly at risk from threats of fires; wildlife destruction due spreading from the west. It is in the east that WCS is focusing its efforts and is commit- to fire (ocellated turkey nests); ted to ensure that this subtropical forest stronghold remains intact. Illegal settlements in the MBR 4 5 VISION FOR THE FUTURE WCS has a 10-year vision for the eastern MBR: Forested parks teeming with wildlife, and effectively managed protected areas and forest concessions where fire is controlled and resource extraction is legal and sustainable. To achieve this vision, we will hold ourselves accountable for: n 90% of the intact eastern MBR protected and managed (more than 3,300 square miles); n The eastern MBR a stronghold for jaguars, with a stable and ecologically functional population across the landscape; n Scarlet macaw breeding areas protected and the population demographically robust. Jaguars and scarlet macaws range widely, rely on different parts of the forest, and are put in jeopardy by the most acute and widespread threats to the region. They are symbols of the forest and their conservation is a measure of our success. By maintaining intact habitat for jaguars and scarlet macaws, we ensure the conservation of thousands of other forest dependent species. To maintain that intact habitat, our focus must be threefold: ensuring that protected areas are effectively managed by government and other stakeholders; providing training and support so that communities are positioned to manage their forest concessions; and tracking the species and landscape trends that indicate success or need for adaptive management. Our conservation objectives will be met when a key set of management programs and circumstances are in place: n Local management of community forest concessions reduces forest fires and illegal colonization, with 90% of concession areas free of fire, deforestation and illegal colonization; n Protected areas of the eastern MBR are well managed by government and NGO partners, with intact forest cover free of fire and colonization; n Trends in habitat and key landscape species are used by government and na- Right, from top and counter- tional institutions to improve the adaptive management of the eastern MBR clockwise: A vision of the eastern landscape, as measured by abundance of wildlife and government resource MBR (mahogany); studying scarlet allocation in the reserve. macaws; scarlet macaw, Ara macao 6 7 ADDRESSING THE RISKS The growing conservation constituency in the eastern MBR is a critical ingredient to well-managed forest concessions, fire control, local NGO engagement and a government able and willing to play its management and enforcement roles in protected areas. WCS is building on that opportunity, and has designed core activities around each of the three areas described above: To ensure effective local management of community forest concessions, WCS is: n Helping three keystone community management areas (Uaxactún, Car- melita, and Paso Caballos) conserve habitat by improving local capacity and promoting alternative livelihoods; n Leading fire prevention programs in eight community forest concessions; n Providing integrated education programs as strong local incentives for habitat conservation in five keystone communities. To ensure that protected areas of the eastern MBR are well managed by govern- ment and NGO partners, WCS is: n Supporting local partners to protect Laguna del Tigre macaw nesting areas from fire and colonization; n Supporting national government and NGO leadership of the Mirador Rio Azul Roundtable (see Building Consensus box, opposite
Recommended publications
  • Marine Director WCS Finaltor

    Marine Director WCS Finaltor

    JOB DESCRIPTION Director, Marine Conservation and Fisheries Wildlife Conservation Society Founded in 1895 as the New York Zoological Society The Wildlife Conservation Society seeks a Director of Marine Conservation and Fisheries, to be based at WCS headquarters in New York City. WCS has a long history of ocean exploration and conservation, including William Beebe’s 1934 record-setting bathysphere dive and Roger Payne’s extraordinary 1974 discovery of humpback whale songs. From these early roots, and reflecting the WCS focus on saving wildlife and wild places, WCS’ marine conservation efforts currently focus on four strategies: Marine Protected Areas, sustainable fisheries, marine mammals, and sharks and rays. Supporting these strategies, WCS maintains a strong commitment to applied marine scientific research and is building its capacity to leverage our impact through WCS’ New York Aquarium and other innovative partnerships. To deliver on these objectives at scale the Director oversees all WCS marine conservation efforts, including the implementation of marine conservation actions by ~250 marine conservation staff in Belize, Cuba, Nicaragua, Argentina, Chile, Gabon, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambiue, Madagascar, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Fiji, New York and the Arctic Beringia, as well as overseeing staff who coordinate global initiatives on marine species (cetaceans and sharks), climate, fisheries and marine policy. The program is staffed by a dynamic and committed team of field scientists based at sites around the world, and a directorate of six staff in New York. Position Objectives: * Direct WCS’s marine conservation programs across 9 global priority regions and all 5 oceans in Africa, Asia, Latin America and North America that largely focus on the establishment and management of marine protected areas, artisanal, and commercial fisheries, and the global conservation of marine mammals and sharks and rays.
  • Chapter 4 Natural Resources and Environmental Constraints

    Chapter 4 Natural Resources and Environmental Constraints

    Chapter 4 Natural Resources and Environmental Constraints PERSONAL VISION STATEMENTS “I want to live in a city that cares about air quality and the environment.” “Keep Birmingham beautiful, especially the water ways.” 4.1 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PART II | CHAPTER 4 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS GOALS POLICIES FOR DECISION MAKERS natural areas and conservation A comprehensive green infrastructure • Support the creation of an interconnected green infrastructure network that includes system provides access to and natural areas for passive recreation, stormwater management, and wildlife habitat. preserves natural areas and • Consider incentives for the conservation and enhancement of natural and urban environmentally sensitive areas. forests. Reinvestment in existing communities • Consider incentives for reinvestment in existing communities rather than conserves resources and sensitive “greenfields,” for new commercial, residential and institutional development. environments. • Consider incentives for development patterns and site design methods that help protect water quality, sensitive environmental features, and wildlife habitat. air and water quality The City makes every effort to • Support the development of cost-effective multimodal transportation systems that consistently meet clean air standards. reduce vehicle emissions. • Encourage use of clean fuels and emissions testing. • Emphasize recruitment of clean industry. • Consider incentives for industries to reduce emissions over time. • Promote the use of cost-effective energy efficient design, materials and equipment in existing and private development. The City makes every effort to • Encourage the Birmingham Water Works Board to protect water-supply sources consistently meet clean water located outside of the city to the extent possible. standards. • Consider incentives for development that protects the city’s water resources.
  • Landowner Guide to the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

    Landowner Guide to the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program

    Landowner Guide to the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program This document provides an overview of the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program, administered by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), and the expectations of the program for interested landowners. ODFW recommends that interested landowners first read this Guide, and if eligible, contact the local ODFW biologists for more information. Additional resources are available on the following website: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/lands/whcmp/. Table of Contents: A. Purpose of the habitat program B. Objective of the habitat program C. History of the habitat program D. Calculating a property’s assessed value E. Dwellings and homesites F. Participating Counties G. Moving from one special assessment category to another H. Landowner process to participate in the program I. Information needed in a habitat plan J. Conservation and management actions in a habitat plan K. Resources counties and cities can provide to assist landowners L. Submission of a habitat plan for review M. Implementation of approved WHCMP plans N. Application for wildlife habitat special assessment O. Monitoring by ODFW P. Amending an approved habitat plan Q. Change of ownership R. Disqualification of a property from wildlife habitat special assessment S. Appendix a. Certification of Eligibility Form b. Landowner Interest Form c. Annual Status Report Form p. 1 2015 A. Purpose of the habitat program: Provide an incentive for habitat conservation The Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program (habitat program), administered by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), is a cooperative effort involving state and local governments and other partners to help private landowners voluntarily conserve native wildlife habitat.
  • AREI Chapter 3.3 Wildlife Resources Conservation

    AREI Chapter 3.3 Wildlife Resources Conservation

    3.3 Wildlife Resources Conservation U.S. agriculture is well positioned to play a major role in protecting and enhancing the nation's wildlife. Wildlife in the U.S is dependent on the considerable land and water resources under the control of agriculture. At the same time, agriculture is one of the most competitive sectors in the U.S., and economic tradeoffs can make it difficult for farmers, on their own, to support wildlife conservation efforts requiring them to adopt more wildlife-friendly production techniques or directly allocate additional land and water resources to wildlife. Besides the opportunity costs associated with shifting resource use or changing production techniques, the public goods and common property nature of wildlife can also affect a farmers decision to protect wildlife found on their land. However, the experiences of USDA conservation programs demonstrate that farmers are willing to voluntarily shift additional land and water resources into habitat, provided they are compensated. Contents Page Introduction....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Tradeoffs Between Agricultural Production and Wildlife Habitat ................................................................... 2 Asymmetric distribution of costs and benefits....................................................................................... 2 Ownership of land and water resources ..............................................................................................
  • Canuto-Et-Al.-2018.Pdf

    Canuto-Et-Al.-2018.Pdf

    RESEARCH ◥ shows field systems in the low-lying wetlands RESEARCH ARTICLE SUMMARY and terraces in the upland areas. The scale of wetland systems and their association with dense populations suggest centralized planning, ARCHAEOLOGY whereas upland terraces cluster around res- idences, implying local management. Analy- Ancient lowland Maya complexity as sis identified 362 km2 of deliberately modified ◥ agricultural terrain and ON OUR WEBSITE another 952 km2 of un- revealed by airborne laser scanning Read the full article modified uplands for at http://dx.doi. potential swidden use. of northern Guatemala org/10.1126/ Approximately 106 km science.aau0137 of causeways within and .................................................. Marcello A. Canuto*†, Francisco Estrada-Belli*†, Thomas G. Garrison*†, between sites constitute Stephen D. Houston‡, Mary Jane Acuña, Milan Kováč, Damien Marken, evidence of inter- and intracommunity con- Philippe Nondédéo, Luke Auld-Thomas‡, Cyril Castanet, David Chatelain, nectivity. In contrast, sizable defensive features Carlos R. Chiriboga, Tomáš Drápela, Tibor Lieskovský, Alexandre Tokovinine, point to societal disconnection and large-scale Antolín Velasquez, Juan C. Fernández-Díaz, Ramesh Shrestha conflict. 2 CONCLUSION: The 2144 km of lidar data Downloaded from INTRODUCTION: Lowland Maya civilization scholars has provided a unique regional perspec- acquired by the PLI alter interpretations of the flourished from 1000 BCE to 1500 CE in and tive revealing substantial ancient population as ancient Maya at a regional scale. An ancient around the Yucatan Peninsula. Known for its well as complex previously unrecognized land- population in the millions was unevenly distrib- sophistication in writing, art, architecture, as- scape modifications at a grand scale throughout uted across the central lowlands, with varying tronomy, and mathematics, this civilization is the central lowlands in the Yucatan peninsula.
  • Water Management Companion Plan

    Water Management Companion Plan

    WATER MANAGEMENT COMPANION PLAN December 2016 Photo Credit: Left: Lake Shasta, California Date: 19 July 2010 Photographer: brianscotland0 via pixabay Right: Monarch Butterfly Date: 17 March 2006 Photographer: Armon via Wiki Commons Prepared by Blue Earth Consultants, LLC December 2016 Disclaimer: Although we have made every effort to ensure that the information contained in this report accurately reflects SWAP 2015 companion plan development team discussions shared through web-based platforms, e-mails, and phone calls, Blue Earth Consultants, LLC makes no guarantee of the completeness and accuracy of information provided by all project sources. SWAP 2015 and associated companion plans are non-regulatory documents. The information shared is not legally binding nor does it reflect a change in the laws guiding wildlife and ecosystem conservation in the state. In addition, mention of organizations or entities in this report as potential partners does not indicate a willingness and/or commitment on behalf of these organizations or entities to partner, fund, or provide support for implementation of this plan or SWAP 2015. The consultant team developed companion plans for multiple audiences, both with and without jurisdictional authority for implementing strategies and conservation activities described in SWAP 2015 and associated companion plans. These audiences include but are not limited to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife leadership team and staff; the California Fish and Game Commission; cooperating state, federal, and local government agencies and organizations; California Tribes and tribal governments; and various partners (such as non-governmental organizations, academic research institutions, and citizen scientists). Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ iii 1.
  • Ancient Maya Territorial Organisation of Central Belize: Confluence of Archaeological and Epigraphic Data

    Ancient Maya Territorial Organisation of Central Belize: Confluence of Archaeological and Epigraphic Data

    &RQWULEXWLRQVLQ1HZ:RUOG $UFKDHRORJ\ ± ANCIENT MAYA TERRITORIAL ORGANISATION OF CENTRAL BELIZE: CONFLUENCE OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND EPIGRAPHIC DATA CHRISTOPHE H ELMKE University of Copenhagen JAIME AWE ,QVWLWXWHRI$UFKDHRORJ\%HOL]H Abstract 7KHPRGHOVSURSRVHGIRUDQFLHQW0D\DWHUULWRULDORUJDQL]DWLRQLQFHQWUDO%HOL]HGLIIHUVLJQL¿FDQWO\IURPRQH UHVHDUFKHU WR DQRWKHU 'XH WR WKH UHODWLYH GHDUWK RI KLHURJO\SKLF GDWD PRVW PRGHOV KDYH EHHQ IRUPXODWHG RQ WKHEDVLVRIDUFKDHRORJLFDOGDWDDORQHDQGDUHSUHGRPLQDQWO\VLWHVSHFL¿FDVVHVVPHQWV,QYHVWLJDWLRQVLQFHQWUDO %HOL]HRYHUWKHSDVWIRXUGHFDGHVKDYHKRZHYHUEURXJKWWROLJKWVHYHUDONH\SLHFHVRIHSLJUDSKLFGDWDLQFOXGLQJ (PEOHP*O\SKV:KHQYLHZHGLQFRQMXQFWLRQWKHDUFKDHRORJLFDODQGHSLJUDSKLFGDWDSURYLGHDQHZYDQWDJHIRU GHWHUPLQLQJWKHVWUXFWXUHRIWKH&ODVVLFSHULRGVRFLRSROLWLFDOODQGVFDSHRIWKH%HOL]H9DOOH\ Resumen /RVPRGHORVSURSXHVWRVSDUDODRUJDQL]DFLyQWHUULWRULDOGHORVPD\DVGHO3HUtRGR&OiVLFRHQ%HOLFH&HQWUDO GL¿HUHQVLJQL¿FDWLYDPHQWHGHXQLQYHVWLJDGRUDRWUR'HELGRDODHVFDVH]GHGDWRVMHURJOt¿FRVODPD\RUtDGHORV PRGHORVVHKDQIRUPXODGRWHQLHQGRHQFXHQWDWDQVRORGDWRVDUTXHROyJLFRV\VHFHQWUDQSUHGRPLQDQWHPHQWHVREUH FDGDVLWLRLQYHVWLJDGR/DVH[SORUDFLRQHVHQ%HOLFH&HQWUDOGHODVFXDWUR~OWLPDVGpFDGDVVLQHPEDUJRKDQVDFDGR DODOX]QXPHURVDVSLH]DVFODYHTXHDSRUWDQGDWRVHSLJUi¿FRVLQFOX\HQGR*OLIRV(PEOHPD9LVWRVHQFRQMXQWRORV GDWRVDUTXHROyJLFRV\HSLJUi¿FRVSURSRUFLRQDQXQDSRVLFLyQPiVYHQWDMRVDHQODGHWHUPLQDFLyQGHODHVWUXFWXUD del paisaje socio-político del Período Clásico del Valle de Belice. INTRODUCTION $ YDULHW\ RI PRGHOV RI DQFLHQW 0D\D WHUULWRULDO RUJDQLVDWLRQ KDYH EHHQ SURSRVHG IRU WKH %HOL]H 9DOOH\RYHUWKHSDVWIRXUGHFDGHV,QSDUWWKHTXDQWLW\RIVXFKPRGHOVFDQEHH[SODLQHGE\WKHIDFW
  • Contenidos Meso 1-50

    Contenidos Meso 1-50

    CONTENIDOS DE MESOAMÉRICA 1–50 1 CONTENIDOS MESOAMÉRICA 1 (1980) AL 50 (2008) 2 ÍNDICE GENERAL 1980–2008 Mesoamérica 1 (1980) CONTENIDO Presentación por JULIO CASTELLANOS CAMBRANES ARTÍCULOS VÍCTOR H. ACUÑA ORTEGA La reglamentación del comercio exterior en América Central durante el siglo XVIII The Regulation of Foreign Commerce in Eighteenth-Century Central America JORGE LUJÁN MUÑOZ Los caciques-gobernadores de San Miguel Petapa (Guatemala) durante la colonia The Caciques-Gobernadores in San Miguel Petapa (Guatemala) during the Colonial Period JULIO CÉSAR PINTO SORIA Acerca del surgimiento del Estado de Centro América The Rise of the State in Central America JESÚS MARÍA GARCÍA AÑOVEROS La realidad social de la Diócesis de Guatemala a finales del siglo XVIII The Social Structure of the Diocese of Guatemala at the end of the Eighteenth Century A. M. ZORINA El Tratado Clayton-Bulwer de 1850 y la diplomacia rusa The Clayton-Bulwer Treaty of 1850 and Russian Diplomacy J. JUDE PANSINI La situación de la salud de los trabajadores de las fincas en Guatemala Worker Health Conditions of the Fincas of Guatemala HISTORIA DEMOGRÁFICA RALPH LEE WOODWARD, JR. Crecimiento de población en Centroamérica durante la primera mitad del siglo de la Independencia nacional Population Growth of Central America during the First Fifty Years after Independence ÍNDICE GENERAL 1980–2008, PÁGS. 2–141 © 2008 MESOAMÉRICA CONTENIDOS DE MESOAMÉRICA 1–50 3 MICHEL BERTRAND Estudio demográfico de la región de Rabinal y del Chixoy en Guatemala Demographic Study of the Rabinal and Chixoy Regions of Guatemala CENTROAMÉRICA ANTE LOS VIAJEROS DEL SIGLO XIX KARL VON SCHERZER Las tribus indígenas de Guatemala The Indian Tribes of Guatemala FUENTES DOCUMENTALES Y BIBLIOGRÁFICAS CHRISTOPHER H.
  • Foundation for Maya Cultural and Natural Heritage

    Foundation for Maya Cultural and Natural Heritage

    Our mission is to coordinate efforts Foundation for Maya Cultural and provide resources to identify, and Natural Heritage lead, and promote projects that protect and maintain the cultural Fundación Patrimonio Cultural y Natural Maya and natural heritage of Guatemala. 2 # nombre de sección “What is in play is immense” HSH Prince Albert II of Monaco he Maya Biosphere Reserve is located in the heart of the Selva Maya, the Maya Jungle. It is an ecological treasure that covers one fifth of Guatemala’s landmass (21,602 Tsquare kilometers). Much of the area remains intact. It was established to preserve—for present and future generations— one of the most spectacular areas of natural and cultural heritage in the world. The Maya Biosphere Reserve is Guatemala’s last stronghold for large-bodied, wide-ranging endangered species, including the jaguar, puma, tapir, and black howler monkey. It also holds the highest concentration of Maya ruins. Clockwise from bottomleft José Pivaral (President of Pacunam), Prince Albert II of Monaco (sponsor), Mel Gibson (sponsor), Richard Hansen (Director of Mirador The year 2012 marks the emblematic change of an era in the ancient calendar of the Maya. This Archaeological Project) at El Mirador momentous event has sparked global interest in environmental and cultural issues in Guatemala. After decades of hard work by archaeologists, environmentalists, biologists, epigraphers, and other scientists dedicated to understanding the ancient Maya civilization, the eyes of the whole Pacunam Overview and Objectives 2 world are now focused on our country. Maya Biosphere Reserve 4 This provides us with an unprecedented opportunity to share with the world our pressing cause: Why is it important? the Maya Biosphere Reserve is in great danger.
  • The Historical Ecology of Human and Wild Primate Malarias in the New World

    The Historical Ecology of Human and Wild Primate Malarias in the New World

    Diversity 2010, 2, 256-280; doi:10.3390/d2020256 OPEN ACCESS diversity ISSN 1424-2818 www.mdpi.com/journal/diversity Article The Historical Ecology of Human and Wild Primate Malarias in the New World Loretta A. Cormier Department of History and Anthropology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1401 University Boulevard, Birmingham, AL 35294-115, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-205-975-6526; Fax: +1-205-975-8360 Received: 15 December 2009 / Accepted: 22 February 2010 / Published: 24 February 2010 Abstract: The origin and subsequent proliferation of malarias capable of infecting humans in South America remain unclear, particularly with respect to the role of Neotropical monkeys in the infectious chain. The evidence to date will be reviewed for Pre-Columbian human malaria, introduction with colonization, zoonotic transfer from cebid monkeys, and anthroponotic transfer to monkeys. Cultural behaviors (primate hunting and pet-keeping) and ecological changes favorable to proliferation of mosquito vectors are also addressed. Keywords: Amazonia; malaria; Neotropical monkeys; historical ecology; ethnoprimatology 1. Introduction The importance of human cultural behaviors in the disease ecology of malaria has been clear at least since Livingstone‘s 1958 [1] groundbreaking study describing the interrelationships among iron tools, swidden horticulture, vector proliferation, and sickle cell trait in tropical Africa. In brief, he argued that the development of iron tools led to the widespread adoption of swidden (―slash and burn‖) agriculture. These cleared agricultural fields carved out a new breeding area for mosquito vectors in stagnant pools of water exposed to direct sunlight. The proliferation of mosquito vectors and the subsequent heavier malarial burden in human populations led to the genetic adaptation of increased frequency of sickle cell trait, which confers some resistance to malaria.
  • Phylogenetic Analyses Suggest Independent Origins for Trichromatic Color Vision in Apes and Old World Monkeys

    Phylogenetic Analyses Suggest Independent Origins for Trichromatic Color Vision in Apes and Old World Monkeys

    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.23.003855; this version posted March 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Phylogenetic analyses suggest independent origins for trichromatic color vision in apes and Old World monkeys Jessica Toloza-Villalobos1 & Juan C. Opazo1 ,2 1Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile. 2Millennium Nucleus of Ion Channels-associated Diseases (MiNICAD). Corresponding authors: Jessica Toloza-Villalobos ([email protected]) Juan C. Opazo ([email protected]) Phone: +56 63 2221674 Running title: Keywords: trichromatic color vision, opsin gene, gene duplication, primate color vision bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.23.003855; this version posted March 23, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract In catarrhine primates, trichromatic color vision is associated with the presence of three opsin genes that absorb light at three different wavelengths. The OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes are found on the X chromosome. Their proximity and similarity suggest that they originated from a duplication event in the catarrhine ancestor. In this study we use the primate genomes available in public databases to study the duplicative history of the OPN1LW and OPN1MW genes and characterize their spectral sensitivity. Our results reveal a phylogenetic tree that shows a clade containing all X-linked opsin paralogs found in Old World monkeys to be related to a clade containing all X-linked opsin paralogs identified in apes, suggesting that routine trichromacy originated independently in apes and Old World monkeys.
  • Deforestation Trends in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala Authored By: February 2015

    Deforestation Trends in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala Authored By: February 2015

    2000-2013 Deforestation Trends in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala Authored by: February 2015 Benjamin D. Hodgdon Rainforest Alliance David Hughell Rainforest Alliance Victor Hugo Ramos Consejo Nacional de Áreas Protegidas/Wildlife Conservation Society Roan Balas McNab Wildlife Conservation Society The Rainforest Alliance works to conserve biodiversity and ensure sustain- able livelihoods by transforming land-use prac- tices, business practices and consumer behavior. www.rainforest -alliance.org SUMMARY Deforestation Trends in the Maya Biosphere Reserve, Guatemala Forest canopy of the MBR from atop the ruins of Tikal Photo by Charlie Watson Covering close to 2.1 million hectares, Guatemala’s Some 15 years after the majority of concessions Maya Biosphere Reserve (MBR) is the largest pro- were awarded, deforestation trends in the MBR dur- tected area in Central America and home to around ing 2000-2013 were analyzed and broken down by 180,000 people, as well as globally important bio- administrative classification, as well as other vari- diversity and cultural heritage. Established in 1990, ables. In summary the analysis found that: the reserve is also the site of an internationally sig- nificant example of multiple-use forest management • The deforestation rate across the entire MBR was with the twin aims of conservation and social devel- 1.2 percent annually during the 14-year period, opment. This paper analyzes deforestation trends in lower than the average rate of deforestation in different management zones of the MBR during the Guatemala as whole, which stood at 1.4 percent period 2000-2013 and looks within these zones to from 2000 to 2010 identify trends among specific management units.