DOCSLIB.ORG

Marine Director WCS Finaltor

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Marine Director WCS Finaltor JOB DESCRIPTION Director, Marine Conservation and Fisheries Wildlife Conservation Society Founded in 1895 as the New York Zoological Society The Wildlife Conservation Society seeks a Director of Marine Conservation and Fisheries, to be based at WCS headquarters in New York City. WCS has a long history of ocean exploration and conservation, including William Beebe’s 1934 record-setting bathysphere dive and Roger Payne’s extraordinary 1974 discovery of humpback whale songs. From these early roots, and reflecting the WCS focus on saving wildlife and wild places, WCS’ marine conservation efforts currently focus on four strategies: Marine Protected Areas, sustainable fisheries, marine mammals, and sharks and rays. Supporting these strategies, WCS maintains a strong commitment to applied marine scientific research and is building its capacity to leverage our impact through WCS’ New York Aquarium and other innovative partnerships. To deliver on these objectives at scale the Director oversees all WCS marine conservation efforts, including the implementation of marine conservation actions by ~250 marine conservation staff in Belize, Cuba, Nicaragua, Argentina, Chile, Gabon, Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Kenya, Tanzania, Mozambiue, Madagascar, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu, Fiji, New York and the Arctic Beringia, as well as overseeing staff who coordinate global initiatives on marine species (cetaceans and sharks), climate, fisheries and marine policy. The program is staffed by a dynamic and committed team of field scientists based at sites around the world, and a directorate of six staff in New York. Position Objectives: * Direct WCS’s marine conservation programs across 9 global priority regions and all 5 oceans in Africa, Asia, Latin America and North America that largely focus on the establishment and management of marine protected areas, artisanal, and commercial fisheries, and the global conservation of marine mammals and sharks and rays. * Promote the conservation of marine resources, the establishment of MPAs to protect coral reefs and other marine communities, the protection of historical use rights of local and indigenous fishers, the improvement of small scale fisheries, and global conservation of marine mammals, sharks and rays with host country governments, donors, governmental agencies and other non-governmental organizations through meetings, speaking engagements, media interviews, writing, and general communications. Direct international attention to important sites and species for conservation; and influence policies that promote their long-term persistence. * Directly line manage 6 primary marine staff in New York: Directors of (1) Indo-Pacific, (2) Atlantic, (3) Marine Mammals, (4) Sharks and Rays, (5) Program Officer, and (6) Budget Officer. * Based on the Marine Program strategic plan as articulated in WCS 2020, provide guidance to project development and implementation; facilitate communication and coordination among and between programs, with other departments and divisions at WCS, and between WCS programs and other institutions; and raise funds sufficient to meet program goals. * Provide strategic leadership for the development of a WCS Fisheries Strategy to deliver on Marine Program Strategic Plan as articulated in WCS 2020. * Leverage within-program and WCS-wide assets to promote marine conservation with national governments, international agencies, and other non-governmental organizations with special emphasis on the species and at the sites of WCS interest; and influence policies that promote the long-term persistence of wildlife and wild lands across the world’s seas and coastal waterways. *Provide institution-wide support on ocean conservation issues, including support to the strategic redevelopment of the New York Aquarium, global, national and local ocean policy and the other cross-cutting marine themes. *Support the larger WCS 2020 strategic plan implementation and other organizational priorities beyond marine conservation. * Assess program priorities, strategy, and approaches. Identify conservation needs in the marine realm; secure funding to establish new initiatives in cooperation with regional programs; and evaluate direction and success of programs, projects, and personnel. * Maintain significant involvement in the raising of financial support for projects, in collaboration with WCS Development staff and Global Conservation Program field staff. Develop proposals and participate in fund-raising activities; identify new funding sources; meet potential donors; speak at fund-raising and other development engagements; maintain contact and reporting with funding sources. * Provide liaison between Marine Program and other parts of WCS: trustees, executive staff, policy staff, Public Affairs, Animal Health Program, Curatorial departments, Exhibits and Graphics, Education. * Coordinate communication across projects and programs in the Marine realm, and between and among staff in WCS’s regional programs around the world. Promote teamwork and the sharing of expertise, helping to ensure that Country Directors around the globe are cognizant of, and engaged in, promoting marine conservation priorities. As the Marine Program has a global reach, such coordination is critical both in New York, and with field programs. * Synthesize lessons learned from WCS’s and other conservation organizations’ activities. Write and publish documents, reports, books, and technical papers. Be active in professional societies, attending meetings, workshops, strategy sessions, species actions plans, etc. * Contribute to, enlarge and uphold the Society’s policies towards Equal Employment Opportunities for women, minorities, veterans, the handicapped, and other protected groups. Qualifications Applicants must have an earned doctorate or equivalent experience in a field related to the conservation of marine biological diversity with a strong background in coral reef conservation and the establishment and management of marine protected areas; 15 years minimum management experience in international marine conservation programs; ability to foster teamwork within the program; excellent interpersonal and communication skills; ability to work in a range of cultural contexts; significant and diverse fundraising experience. The position is based at WCS headquarters in New York City, includes a significant travel schedule. Salary level commensurate with experience. Please apply online at www.wcs.org/about-us/careers and send a cover letter and CV with the subject line “Director, Marine Conservation and Fisheries - [your name]” to [email protected]. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • View Project
    TAPE ART NEW YORK AQUARIUM The Bathysphere There is never a shortage of things to see on the boardwalk at Coney Island. In August 2014, however, passersby were treated to something new: Over the course of five days, Tape Art created a three-part mural on the grounds of the New York Aquarium, recalling the historic accomplishments of the Bathysphere, a deep-sea exploration capsule. 1-800-tape-art • tapeart.com TAPE ART NEW YORK AQUARIUM The project was commissioned to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the Bathysphere’s descent a half-mile (3,028 feet) below the ocean’s surface, on August 15, 1934. It set a record for human exploration of the deep that remained unbroken for the next fifteen years. The capsule was the result of a partnership between William Beebe and Otis Barton, who explored the deep together from within their tiny metal sphere. Measuring only four feet and nine inches in diameter, there was no room inside for a camera of that period. Instead, they used a telephone line to verbally describe the creatures they saw to Gloria Hollister, up on deck. These descriptions were later used to create sketches and paintings of the previously unseen marine life they had encountered. 1-800-tape-art • tapeart.com TAPE ART NEW YORK AQUARIUM The Narrative Barton and Beebe were the first humans to witness deepwater fish in their natural environment, exploring a world hitherto only imagined and much mythologized. Their first-hand accounts were originally dismissed by some as flights of fancy. In the intervening years, the scientific community has identified nearly all the fish they documented.
    [Show full text]
  • Summer 2017 MUSEUMS
    Summer 2017 Updated and Compiled by C. Azaria MUSEUMS Brooklyn Children’s Museum- 145 Brooklyn Avenue The new exhibits feature hands-on activities, role-playing opportunities, authentic Museum specimens and artifacts, and hundreds of new things to discover in the arts, culture, science, and the environment! The museum offers free admission on Thursdays from 2-6pm. Call to find out more (718) 735-4400. Children’s Museum of Manhattan Target FREE First Friday Nights 5-8PM. The first Friday of every month is free. The Tisch Building, 212 West 83rd Street, New York, NY 10024 212-721-1223 Museum of Moving Image Museum of the Moving Image is the country's only museum dedicated to the art, history, technique, and technology of the moving image in all its forms. The Museum is a one-of-a-kind destination for audiences of all ages and interests, from connoisseurs of classic cinema to children and families to avid gamers. Fridays free admission 4-8PM 36-01 35th Ave, New York, NY 11106 (718) 777-6800 NY Hall of Science New York Hall of Science is a place for everyone to explore, question and learn. In addition to over 450 permanent exhibits, NYSCI features a dynamic schedule of feature exhibitions, events, programs and workshops. Enjoy free general admission on Fridays, 2 – 5 pm and Sundays, 10 – 11 am. 47-01 111th St, Corona, NY 11368 (718) 699-0005 Queens County Farm Museum he Queens County Farm Museum dates back to 1697 and occupies New York City's largest remaining tract of undisturbed farmland.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 Natural Resources and Environmental Constraints
    Chapter 4 Natural Resources and Environmental Constraints PERSONAL VISION STATEMENTS “I want to live in a city that cares about air quality and the environment.” “Keep Birmingham beautiful, especially the water ways.” 4.1 CITY OF BIRMINGHAM COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PART II | CHAPTER 4 NATURAL RESOURCES AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS GOALS POLICIES FOR DECISION MAKERS natural areas and conservation A comprehensive green infrastructure • Support the creation of an interconnected green infrastructure network that includes system provides access to and natural areas for passive recreation, stormwater management, and wildlife habitat. preserves natural areas and • Consider incentives for the conservation and enhancement of natural and urban environmentally sensitive areas. forests. Reinvestment in existing communities • Consider incentives for reinvestment in existing communities rather than conserves resources and sensitive “greenfields,” for new commercial, residential and institutional development. environments. • Consider incentives for development patterns and site design methods that help protect water quality, sensitive environmental features, and wildlife habitat. air and water quality The City makes every effort to • Support the development of cost-effective multimodal transportation systems that consistently meet clean air standards. reduce vehicle emissions. • Encourage use of clean fuels and emissions testing. • Emphasize recruitment of clean industry. • Consider incentives for industries to reduce emissions over time. • Promote the use of cost-effective energy efficient design, materials and equipment in existing and private development. The City makes every effort to • Encourage the Birmingham Water Works Board to protect water-supply sources consistently meet clean water located outside of the city to the extent possible. standards. • Consider incentives for development that protects the city’s water resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Landowner Guide to the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program
    Landowner Guide to the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program This document provides an overview of the Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program, administered by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), and the expectations of the program for interested landowners. ODFW recommends that interested landowners first read this Guide, and if eligible, contact the local ODFW biologists for more information. Additional resources are available on the following website: http://www.dfw.state.or.us/lands/whcmp/. Table of Contents: A. Purpose of the habitat program B. Objective of the habitat program C. History of the habitat program D. Calculating a property’s assessed value E. Dwellings and homesites F. Participating Counties G. Moving from one special assessment category to another H. Landowner process to participate in the program I. Information needed in a habitat plan J. Conservation and management actions in a habitat plan K. Resources counties and cities can provide to assist landowners L. Submission of a habitat plan for review M. Implementation of approved WHCMP plans N. Application for wildlife habitat special assessment O. Monitoring by ODFW P. Amending an approved habitat plan Q. Change of ownership R. Disqualification of a property from wildlife habitat special assessment S. Appendix a. Certification of Eligibility Form b. Landowner Interest Form c. Annual Status Report Form p. 1 2015 A. Purpose of the habitat program: Provide an incentive for habitat conservation The Wildlife Habitat Conservation and Management Program (habitat program), administered by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW), is a cooperative effort involving state and local governments and other partners to help private landowners voluntarily conserve native wildlife habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • AREI Chapter 3.3 Wildlife Resources Conservation
    3.3 Wildlife Resources Conservation U.S. agriculture is well positioned to play a major role in protecting and enhancing the nation's wildlife. Wildlife in the U.S is dependent on the considerable land and water resources under the control of agriculture. At the same time, agriculture is one of the most competitive sectors in the U.S., and economic tradeoffs can make it difficult for farmers, on their own, to support wildlife conservation efforts requiring them to adopt more wildlife-friendly production techniques or directly allocate additional land and water resources to wildlife. Besides the opportunity costs associated with shifting resource use or changing production techniques, the public goods and common property nature of wildlife can also affect a farmers decision to protect wildlife found on their land. However, the experiences of USDA conservation programs demonstrate that farmers are willing to voluntarily shift additional land and water resources into habitat, provided they are compensated. Contents Page Introduction....................................................................................................................................................... 1 Tradeoffs Between Agricultural Production and Wildlife Habitat ................................................................... 2 Asymmetric distribution of costs and benefits....................................................................................... 2 Ownership of land and water resources ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Water Management Companion Plan
    WATER MANAGEMENT COMPANION PLAN December 2016 Photo Credit: Left: Lake Shasta, California Date: 19 July 2010 Photographer: brianscotland0 via pixabay Right: Monarch Butterfly Date: 17 March 2006 Photographer: Armon via Wiki Commons Prepared by Blue Earth Consultants, LLC December 2016 Disclaimer: Although we have made every effort to ensure that the information contained in this report accurately reflects SWAP 2015 companion plan development team discussions shared through web-based platforms, e-mails, and phone calls, Blue Earth Consultants, LLC makes no guarantee of the completeness and accuracy of information provided by all project sources. SWAP 2015 and associated companion plans are non-regulatory documents. The information shared is not legally binding nor does it reflect a change in the laws guiding wildlife and ecosystem conservation in the state. In addition, mention of organizations or entities in this report as potential partners does not indicate a willingness and/or commitment on behalf of these organizations or entities to partner, fund, or provide support for implementation of this plan or SWAP 2015. The consultant team developed companion plans for multiple audiences, both with and without jurisdictional authority for implementing strategies and conservation activities described in SWAP 2015 and associated companion plans. These audiences include but are not limited to the California Department of Fish and Wildlife leadership team and staff; the California Fish and Game Commission; cooperating state, federal, and local government agencies and organizations; California Tribes and tribal governments; and various partners (such as non-governmental organizations, academic research institutions, and citizen scientists). Table of Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations ................................................................................................ iii 1.
    [Show full text]
  • For-74: a Guide to Urban Habitat Conservation Planning
    FOR-74 A Guide to Urban Habitat Conservation Planning Thomas G. Barnes, Extension Wildlife Specialist Lowell Adams, National Institute for Urban Wildlife entuckians value their forests and Kother natural resources for aes- Guidelines for Considering Wildlife in the Urban Development thetic, recreational, and economic Process significance, so over the past several Promote habitats that will have the food, cover, water, and living space that decades they have become increasingly all wildlife require by following these guidelines: concerned about the loss of wildlife • Before development, maximize open space and make an effort to protect the habitat and greenspace. Urban and most valuable wildlife habitat by placing buildings on less important portions suburban development is one of the of the site. Choosing cluster development, which is flexible, can help. leading causes of this loss: A recent • Provide water, and design stormwater control impoundments to benefit wildlife. study indicated that every day in • Use native plants that have value for wildlife as well as aesthetic appeal. Kentucky more than 100 acres of rural • Provide bird-feeding stations and nest boxes for cavity-nesting birds like land is being converted to urban house wrens and wood ducks. development. • Educate residents about wildlife conservation, using, for example, informa- Because concern for loss of tion packets or a nature trail through open space. greenspace is not new, we have for • Ensure a commitment to managing urban wildlife habitats. some time created attractive urban greenspace environments with our parks and backyards. These The publication can also be useful to A landscape is a large area com- greenspaces have been created not so the average homeowner in understand- posed of ecosystems (the plants, much for wildlife habitats as for people ing the complex issues involved in animals, other living organisms, and to enjoy, but the potential for wildlife landscape planning and wildlife their physical surroundings).
    [Show full text]
  • HOW WE DO IT: Wildlife Habitat
    SUSTAINABILITY @ WEYERHAEUSER HOW WE DO IT: Wildlife Habitat A common misperception of managed forests is that they do not support diverse plant and animal communities — but the truth is our forests are home to vibrant ecosystems throughout the United States and Canada. The forests we manage in the western U.S. alone host more than 250 native vertebrate species, including large mammals such as deer, elk, cougar, black bear and bobcat, as well as a tremendous diversity of birds, reptiles, amphibians, insects, native fish and other aquatic species. Many of these species prefer different forest age classes and forest structures, or other habitat features on the landscape, such as riparian areas. Since our timberlands contain a matrix of forest stand ages, along with other special areas we protect around streams and wetlands, these forests support a high level of native biodiversity. KEY POINTS • To manage these habitat types and protect biological diversity at multiple spatial scales, we participate in conservation partnerships with state and federal agencies and nonprofit organizations1, and we support our planning and decision- making with our internal Environmental Research and Operational Support teams. • We also frequently partner with other research organizations to ensure our practices are consistent with the best available science — and that we are meeting our conservation objectives, including protecting water quality and biodiversity, and providing habitat for threatened, endangered and sensitive species. • Weyerhaeuser has a long history of contributing timberlands for conservation initiatives through land exchanges, sales, donations and conservation easements. • Through special programs, including Habitat Conservation Plans and Candidate Conservation Agreements with Assurances, we are able to enroll our timberlands in conservation agreements that ensure our forests provide habitat features that support at-risk or sensitive species — and still sustainably harvest and regenerate timber.
    [Show full text]
  • Bath Beach Gravesend Brighton Beach
    Neighborhood Map ¯ 62 Arturo Toscanini 2839 School, PS 216 Avenue X 2848 32 Bay 47 Street 17 214 2849 Bay 50 St Street 3 W 34 Harway Avenue 2599 37 Lady Deborah Moody 2899 School, PS 212 Bouck Court 2791 28 Avenue John Dewey 73 High School Bay 50 Street 198 2633 2498 Bay 49 Street Shell Road 2475 2499 2499 2499 2499 321 363 375 2499 401 423 451 475 Avenue Y Avenue Y Avenue Y 2815 Harway Terrace Apartments 380 402 426 450 472 2501 2501 2501 2501 2501 B4 109 194 B4 2514 2515 Cropsey Avenue 1 99 B82 W 15 Place Cobeck Court 217 LTD Bath B82 LTD 2517 B82 2511 B82 Bay 50 Street153 172 2693 Beach 2542 2117 E 1 Street 1 E W 1 Street Shell Road Street 2 W W 3 Street 3 W West Street West 2853 1 99 Bay 50 Street Cropsey Avenue W 17 Street 17 W Dank Court West W 16 Street Playground W 15 Street 15 W 2549 Stillwell Avenue Stillwell 2885 2584 2719 W 13 Street 13 W 2599 2599 2599 715 527 587 603 2599 675 2599 203 2583 2582 2599 247 2599 279 293 B4 Avenue Z Avenue Z Avenue Z Avenue Z 256 330 Coney Island Complex 556 590 B4 638 2601 2585 2601 2729 2601 2623 2291 2612 2627 Shore Parkway B64 2301 B64 1 2619 Gravesend Bay 52 Street 2341 Murdock Court Cropsey Avenue Beach Haven Apartments 2933 2200 Belt Parkway 2932 2953 Beach Haven Beach Haven 2659 Apartments 99 Apartments West Street West W 17 Street 17 W 2649 W 2 Street 2 W 2 Canal Av Shell Road 1 2955 Bay 53 Street 100 2679 Bokee Court Nixon Court 125 98 2671 2663 W 3 Street 3 W 2775 Colby Court 2739 Bay 54 Street 2699 2691 Shore Parkway 2669 2699 19 1401 2689 2649 2649 2699 2865 Shore Parkway 2994 3011 Belt Parkway Belt Parkway Hart Place 1526 Shore Parkway 2710 2691 2701 1505 2648 2651 Herbert S.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Conservation Strategy
    Wildlife Conservation Strategy Boise National Forest July 2010 What is the Wildlife Conservation Strategy? The Boise National Forest is developing a Wildlife Conservation Strategy (WCS) in accordance with its Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan). The WCS will prioritize the types of activities that should be undertaken to help maintain or restore habitat for wildlife species in greatest need of conservation. The WCS will also identify where these actions are most needed. Assessing 300 wildlife species and their habitats on the planning unit is very complex. To reduce this complexity, the WCS and associated Forest Plan amendments will be completed in four phases over the next 4–5 years, based on four major biological communities: ♦ Phase 1: Forested Biological Community ♦ Phase 2: Rangeland Biological Community ♦ Phase 3: Unique Combinations of Forested and Rangeland Communities ♦ Phase 4: Riparian and Wetland Communities The Forest Service completed Phase 1 of the WCS in July 2010. Location of the Boise National Forest Why did the Forest Undertake Development of a WCS? In 2003, the Boise National Forest revised its 1990 Forest Plan. During Forest Plan revision, wildlife habitat families that had declined from historical conditions were identified and management direction was developed for these families based on identified habitat conservation and restoration needs. However, a comprehensive strategy that prioritized areas for wildlife habitat maintenance and restoration was not included in the 2003 Forest Plan update. Instead, the revised Forest Plan contained a wildlife objective (WIOB03) that called for developing such a strategy—the WCS. Work began in 2005 to meet this wildlife objective by developing a strategy that prioritizes areas for treatments to improve the health and sustainability of forests and associated wildlife habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • THE CYCLONE, 834 Surf Avenue at West 10Th Street, Brooklyn
    Landmarks Preservation Commission July 12, 1988; Designation List 206 LP-1636 THE CYCLONE, 834 Surf Avenue at West 10th Street, Brooklyn. Built 1927. Inventor Harry c. Baker. Engineer Vernon Keenan. Landmark Site: Borough of Brooklyn Tax Map Block 8697, Lot 4 in part consisting of the land on which the described improvement is situated. On September 15, 1987, the Landmarks Preservation Commission held a public hearing on the proposed designation as a Landmark of the cyclone and the proposed designation of the related Landmark Site (Item No. 12). The hearing had been duly advertised in accordance with the provisions of law. Six witnesses spoke in favor of designation, including the ride's owner, whose support was given dependant upon his ability to perform routine repair and maintenance. One witness spoke in opposition to designation. The Commission has received many letters in favor of designation. DESCRIPTION AND ANALYSIS Summary Descended from the ice slides enjoyed in eighteenth-century Russia, through the many changes incorporated by French and American inventors, the Cyclone has been one of our country's premier roller coasters since its construction in 1927. Designed by engineer Vernon Keenan and built by noted amusement ride inventor Harry C. Baker for Jack and Irving Rosenthal, the Cyclone belongs to an increasingly rare group of wood-track coasters; modern building codes make it irreplaceable. The design of its twister-type circuit and the enormous weight of the cars allow the trains to travel on their own momentum after being carried up to the first plunge by mechanical means. Now part of Astroland amusement park, the Cyclone is not only a well­ recognized feature of Coney Island, where the first "modern" coaster was built in 1884, but, sadly, is the only roller coaster still operating there.
    [Show full text]
  • Completing Coney's Comeback
    MARCH 2010 www.nycfuture.org COMPLETING CONEY’S COMEBACK Ten Suggestions for Making the By Jasper Goldman, David Gratt and Juan Rivero 2010 Summer Season a Success CONEY ISLAND GOT ITS FIRST JOLT OF GOOD NEWS IN YEARS THIS past December when the Bloomberg administration purchased six acres of land at the heart of the old amusement district and committed to set it aside as parkland dedicated to amusements in perpetuity. City officials then leased the site to the Italian ride manufacturer Zamperla USA, which plans to have several new rides and attractions in place by this summer—com- plementing existing attractions such as the Cyclone, Deno’s Wonder Wheel Park, Coney Island USA and the New York Aquarium. These are incredibly welcome developments for the “People’s Playground” after a turbulent couple of years in which one of the area’s two remaining amusement parks, Astroland, and a handful of other long-time attractions lost their leases and had to shut down. It’s now critical to continue this mo- mentum through the upcoming summer. After years of setbacks and nega- tive press reports, a truly successful 2010 season could re-establish Coney Island as a thriving outdoor entertainment destination, potentially leading to more infrastructure investment, the expansion of the amusement area and a greater amount of programming in the future. But making the 2010 season a success will require more than just a new amusement operator. City officials and other stakeholders will have to ad- dress several of the entrenched problems that have long undermined the area’s appeal.
    [Show full text]