DOCSLIB.ORG

Of Third Parties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Of Third Parties THE RISE (AND FALL) OF THIRD PARTIES CHARLES J. SYKES ow many started electing third times has this party governors Hh a p p e n e d nearly a century before? a g o . ) Third parties rat- * Trends in tle the cages of the technology media major parties, flirt seem to create fertile with double-digits in ground for minor the polls, tantalizing parties. Alternative activists and pundits media have broken alike with visions of the network monop- political upheavals oly on political infor- and gridlock — only mation, while the to fade at the end. rise of the Internet dramatically expand- This November’s ed the opportunities election will likely be for activists to a repeat, with the spread their mes- minor parties reduced sage, communicate again to mere aster- with one another, and organize grass-roots isks. As unsurprising as that might seem, it movements. wasn’t supposed to be that way this year. * And finally, changing demographics seem Consider: to open the door to insurgent parties, as * Despite fading in 1996, Ross Perot’s voters outgrew traditional loyalties to Reform Party deprived Bill Clinton of a established parties. majority of the popular vote in two presi- In the long run, all of this may fuel power- dential elections, winning enough of the ful third party movements. But for the time vote to qualify for federal campaign being, the minor parties are still the lint traps money. of American politics, where all the leftover * Throughout the 1990s, polls had shown crotchets and weird fur-balls of ideological growing dissatisfaction with major par- extremism seem to settle. ties. Independents like Angus King in Maine and Jesse "The Body" Ventura in Charles J. Sykes is the editor of WI:Wisconsin Interest Minnesota seemed to presage new possi- and a senior fellow of the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute. bilities for third party candidates to actu- He also hosts a talk radio show on AM 620 WTMJ in ally win major contests. (In Wisconsin, we Milwaukee. His most recent book is The End of Privacy pub - lished by St. Martin’s Press. Wisconsin Interest 7 Closing Ranks have posed a more credible threat if anti-free trade activists had been energized to abandon None of this is to suggest that the minor Gore. But despite his role as cheer leader for candidates — Pat Buchanan and Ralph Nader NAFTA, Gore has quickly shelved his free — haven’t been entertaining and haven’t had trade credentials, and organized labor has an impact on the race. decided that winning the election trumps its On the right, Buchanan has come close to a own lingering discontents. While his sharp political hat trick: he’s not only helped fuel the turn to the left at the Democratic Convention rise of Ralph Nader; he’s helped the GOP rid may ultimately weaken his appeal to political itself of the wacko lock-‘n-load militia wanna- moderates, Gore’s decision to reinvent himself be Right; and effectively cratered Ross Perot’s (again), as a pitchfork populist seems likely to Reform Party. weaken the Nader appeal. The finger pointing, name-calling, push- There’s a lesson here somewhere. ing, and shoving at the Reform Party conven- The Third Way tion improbably made Perot himself look like a model of stability. As for Buchanan, the one- Historically third parties have had an time Republican gadfly’s support has dwin- impact in one of three ways: (1) If they are led dled to the almost pure crack factor, the kind by strong, charismatic leaders with a large fol- of guys who stock up pork and beans in their lowing, such as Teddy Roosevelt, Robert La basement against the day when the Follette, or even Perot; (2) if they represent Bilderbergers and the Trilateralists make their regional insurgencies — Strom Thurmond in Big Move. 1948 and George Wallace in 1968; or (3) if they articulate a set of clear, jealously guarded prin- Unfortunately, this isn’t an election that ciples (ala the Progressives, Socialists, or more will turn on that sort of paranoia. People with recently the Libertarians.). Although they fat 401(k)’s tend not to obsess about the machi- never posed any risk of actually winning any- nations of the New World Order or black heli- thing at the national level, Socialist Norman copters. Thomas and Wisconsin’s own Bob LaFollette Third party candidates thrive in times of exerted a strong pull on the left wing of the division and disillusionment with the estab- Democratic party. In particular, LaFollette’s lished political parties. Some of the notable progressivism helped shape the New Deal. third party bids (John Anderson in 1980 for Despite their own endemic fractiousness, the instance) reflected the weaknesses of one or Libertarians may be the closest to that model, the other major party. developing a political/intellectual network that includes a steady stream of books, But this year, voters seem strikingly unin- newsletters, and think-tanks that push free terested. Prosperity is a poor incubator for dis- market perspectives. gruntlement. Beyond that, voters seem to sense that the election is close and the stakes high But this was a process that takes place over and many are reluctant to waste their vote on a decades, not merely during the convulsive statement of principle or protest. This would herky-jerky of quadrennial elections. In 1992, not matter if there were a single driving issue Ross Perot won nearly one in five votes, but motivating an outsider challenger. But the never managed to create any sort of organiza- most powerful constituencies on both the left tion or movement that could build on that and the right seem relatively satisfied with the showing. Perot’s candidacy was largely about choices offered by the two major parties. Perot; if there was an issue, it was the need to balance the budget and reform campaigns. But Even so, Buchanan might have been a fac- campaign finance has never been the hot but- tor had pro-lifers felt excluded from the ton issue the media imagines, and the booming Republican Party (they don’t); Nader could economy erased the deficit. 8 Fall 2000 Without Perot himself, the Reform Party cedures that major parties with an actual shot had neither personality nor principle. at winning elections are forced to eschew. At the Reform convention we got a glimpse of the In many ways, Perot’s party was like him minor parties at their absolute worst, a scene — strange and a bit paranoid. Actually, the all the more riveting for having a certain sense Reform Party was never so much a movement of inevitability about it. What else, after all, as a magnet for the permanently disgruntled could be expected of a party that had spent the and crotchety. It attracted people accustomed spring variously flirting and fantasizing about to the politics of annoyance at a high decibel running Donald Trump, John McCain, Jesse level, given to writing letters to the editor with Ventura, Perot, and dozen or so political lots of words capitalized and a generous sup- mouth-breathers for president? ply of exclamation points. Unfortunately, it was never all that clear what they were Fire On The Left annoyed about. The decline of Perot’s party also means that Perot was quirky and driven enough to for the first time since 1948, the top third party give some focus to all of that angst, but he also candidate will be from the left. ensured that his party "You’re seeing Nader wouldn’t survive. bumper stickers already," A role model for con- State Representative Mark trol-freaks everywhere, Pocan (D-Madison) told Perot made sure the "vol- the Associated Press in Los unteers" would never Angeles during the develop a movement of Nader has both Democrat’s convention. their own. Instead of Pocan openly worried that building on his national ideas and the Gore campaign wasn’t success, Perot’s almost a constituency. taking Nader’s candidacy constant purging of the seriously enough. "I’m state parties tended to always afraid when they leave the party in the don’t pay enough atten- hands of the crankiest and tion to the Nader factor." most eccentric members. The Green party Ultimately, though, nominee is expected to be the Reform Party was ruined by the fat wad of on the ballot in 45 states; and prior to the federal money. The $12.5 million turned the Democratic convention, polls put his support party into a political spoil. In the absence of a at around 6 percent, not enough to be included core set of principles, the Reform Party was like in the Fall debates, but enough to put in doubt an abandoned car with the keys in the ignition some states that ought to be safely in Gore’s and a tank full of gas. Inevitably, it attracted column. The scariest prospect for the the wrong elements — from Marxists like Democratic nominee is California, where Lenora Fulani, to "Natural Law Party" guru Nader is at 8 percent in the polls, enough to John Hagelin. The result was the Reform Party raise the prospect of throwing the biggest elec- convention’s descent from farce to slapstick toral prize of all into the Bush column. comedy, to litigation and the rise of the Greens Nader has both ideas and a constituency. as the most credible third party on the ballot. Permanently rumpled and a so-so (at best) Few minor parties can resist the nostalgia stump speaker, Nader is making a strong run for irrelevance — the freedom from responsi- at voters who think the Democrats have bility that allows them to indulge in endless become a corporatized mirror image of the nit-picks over ideology, personalities, and pro- Republicans.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Women and the Presidency
    Women and the Presidency By Cynthia Richie Terrell* I. Introduction As six women entered the field of Democratic presidential candidates in 2019, the political media rushed to declare 2020 a new “year of the woman.” In the Washington Post, one political commentator proclaimed that “2020 may be historic for women in more ways than one”1 given that four of these woman presidential candidates were already holding a U.S. Senate seat. A writer for Vox similarly hailed the “unprecedented range of solid women” seeking the nomination and urged Democrats to nominate one of them.2 Politico ran a piece definitively declaring that “2020 will be the year of the woman” and went on to suggest that the “Democratic primary landscape looks to be tilted to another woman presidential nominee.”3 The excited tone projected by the media carried an air of inevitability: after Hillary Clinton lost in 2016, despite receiving 2.8 million more popular votes than her opponent, ever more women were running for the presidency. There is a reason, however, why historical inevitably has not yet been realized. Although Americans have selected a president 58 times, a man has won every one of these contests. Before 2019, a major party’s presidential debates had never featured more than one woman. Progress toward gender balance in politics has moved at a glacial pace. In 1937, seventeen years after passage of the Nineteenth Amendment, Gallup conducted a poll in which Americans were asked whether they would support a woman for president “if she were qualified in every other respect?”4 * Cynthia Richie Terrell is the founder and executive director of RepresentWomen, an organization dedicated to advancing women’s representation and leadership in the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Maryland's Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016
    A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 A History of Maryland’s Electoral College Meetings 1789-2016 Published by: Maryland State Board of Elections Linda H. Lamone, Administrator Project Coordinator: Jared DeMarinis, Director Division of Candidacy and Campaign Finance Published: October 2016 Table of Contents Preface 5 The Electoral College – Introduction 7 Meeting of February 4, 1789 19 Meeting of December 5, 1792 22 Meeting of December 7, 1796 24 Meeting of December 3, 1800 27 Meeting of December 5, 1804 30 Meeting of December 7, 1808 31 Meeting of December 2, 1812 33 Meeting of December 4, 1816 35 Meeting of December 6, 1820 36 Meeting of December 1, 1824 39 Meeting of December 3, 1828 41 Meeting of December 5, 1832 43 Meeting of December 7, 1836 46 Meeting of December 2, 1840 49 Meeting of December 4, 1844 52 Meeting of December 6, 1848 53 Meeting of December 1, 1852 55 Meeting of December 3, 1856 57 Meeting of December 5, 1860 60 Meeting of December 7, 1864 62 Meeting of December 2, 1868 65 Meeting of December 4, 1872 66 Meeting of December 6, 1876 68 Meeting of December 1, 1880 70 Meeting of December 3, 1884 71 Page | 2 Meeting of January 14, 1889 74 Meeting of January 9, 1893 75 Meeting of January 11, 1897 77 Meeting of January 14, 1901 79 Meeting of January 9, 1905 80 Meeting of January 11, 1909 83 Meeting of January 13, 1913 85 Meeting of January 8, 1917 87 Meeting of January 10, 1921 88 Meeting of January 12, 1925 90 Meeting of January 2, 1929 91 Meeting of January 4, 1933 93 Meeting of December 14, 1936
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter Iv What If We Held A
    202 Chapter IV CHAPTER IV WHAT IF WE HELD A DEMOCRACY; WOULD ANYONE COME? If liberty and equality, as is thought by some, are chiefly to be found in democracy, they will be best attained when all persons alike share in the government to the utmost. —Plato (From Politics, Book IV) It is March 3, 1992. Vermont lies white across the mountains of northern New England. The winter has been normal—too long and too cold for most of the people of the planet who live somewhere to the south. But now this part of America’s great north woods is stretching ever so slightly. The natives sense it and take heart in the hint of nature’s connections; the seasonal bends of cold and warm that wind behind them along a lost river of time. The very coldest and the very loneliest corner of this little American state is what Vermonters call the Northeast Kingdom. Here 2000 square miles of tough sledding pitch and snarl hard on the Canadian border while off to the east New Hampshire’s high peaks stand guard. Here 48 little towns have reached accommodation with the land and the moose and the bear and the beaver that share it with them. Here on this day in the center of the Kingdom in a town called Newark, citizens will once again navigate a yearly enterprise of their own connections. They will come together to govern themselves—face to face. This kind of politics has been flowing through the Kingdom for two centuries in a way that seems as untouched by the years as the great cedar swamps that mark the 203 Chapter IV lower contours of the hardwood hills.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommended Telephone Call, to Anne Armstrong
    The original documents are located in Box C13, folder “Presidential Handwriting, 2/14/1975 (2)” of the Presidential Handwriting File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Copyright Notice The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproductions of copyrighted material. Gerald Ford donated to the United States of America his copyrights in all of his unpublished writings in National Archives collections. Works prepared by U.S. Government employees as part of their official duties are in the public domain. The copyrights to materials written by other individuals or organizations are presumed to remain with them. If you think any of the information displayed in the PDF is subject to a valid copyright claim, please contact the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library. Digitized from Box C13 of The Presidential Handwriting File at the Gerald R. Ford Presidential Library THE WHITE HOUSE__ WASH~NGTON RECOMMENDED TELEPHONE CALL TO: ANNE ARMSTRONG DATE: Saturday, February 15, 1975 ~OMMENDED BY: Gwen Anderson, Jack Calkins PURPOSE: To greet Mrs. Armstrong on the occasion of a party hosted by Mr. and Mrs. H. Ross Perot to welcome Mrs. Armstrong back to Texas and to honor her for her service to the Nation. BACKGROUND: Mrs. Armstrong resigned as Counsellor to the President on November 26, 1974. She served in that post since December 18, 1972,and was the first woman to hold the title. Prior to that she was Co-Chairman of the Republican National Committee from January 1971 Deputy Secretary of Defense William Clements is your official representative to the event and will deliver a letter of greeting and congratulation from you.
    [Show full text]
  • The Invisible Primary and the 1996 Presidential Nomination
    The Invisible Primary and the 1996 Presidential Nomination Thomas R. Marshall, University of Texas at Arlington The 1996 presidential nominations process will not begin with the first state primaries and caucuses. By January 1996 the candidates had already spent millions of dollars and thousands of days campaigning during the "in­ visible primary." The 1996 nominations race features several new prac­ tices—such as the front-loading of delegate-selection events, and the re- emergence of Washington insiders as the early GOP leaders. For the first time since 1964 the Democrat Party did not face a spirited nominations race. This article reviews the prenomination season for the 1996 presidential race with evidence available by early January 1996. Public Opinion Public opinion remained relatively stable during the 1995 "invisible primary," just as it typically has in recent presidential contests.1 Heavy spending in key primary and caucus states, debates among the candidates, and the entry and exit of candidates all failed to move public opinion polls during 1995. In the absence of saturation media coverage and media labeling of "winners" and "losers" in the early caucuses and primaries, few dramatic poll shifts appeared. The Republicans Throughout 1995, the Gallup Poll reported only slight changes in the first-choice preferences of self-identified Republicans and independents leaning Republicans. Between April 1995 and January 1996, front-runner Bob Dole’s support varied only from a low of 45 percent to a high of 51 percent. Support for Senator Phil Gramm varied only from a low of seven percent to a high of 13 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Schnoebelen Dissertation-FULL VERSION
    The Gendered Shackles of the Would-Be “Madame President”: A Rhetorical Analysis of Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Communication during the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary BY ©2010 James M. Schnoebelen Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. __________________________________ Chairperson __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ Date Defended __________________________________ The Dissertation Committee for James M. Schnoebelen certifies That this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Gendered Shackles of the Would-Be “Madame President”: A Rhetorical Analysis of Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Communication during the 2008 Democratic Presidential Primary Committee: __________________________________ Chairperson __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ Date Defended __________________________________ 2 This work is dedicated to all of the daring women who have ever tried to break the highest and hardest glass ceiling in the United States (in chronological order): Victoria Woodhull (1872, 1892) Belva Lockwood (1884, 1888) Grace Allen (1940) Margaret Chase Smith (1964) Charlene Mitchell (1968) Shirley Chisholm (1972) Patsy Takemoto Mink (1972) Bella Abzug (1972) Linda Osteen
    [Show full text]
  • The Rhetoric of Political Time: Tracing the Neoliberal Regime’S
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Texas A&M Repository THE RHETORIC OF POLITICAL TIME: TRACING THE NEOLIBERAL REGIME’S ASCENT A Dissertation by ANDREA JUNE TERRY Submitted to the Office of Graduate and Professional Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Chair of Committee, Jennifer R. Mercieca Committee Members, Kristan Poirot Jennifer Jones Barbour Robert Mackin Head of Department, J. Kevin Barge May 2017 Major Subject: Communication Copyright 2017 Andrea June Terry ABSTRACT In this dissertation, I argue that Stephen Skowronek’s theory of political time can be used as analytic to better understand the rhetorical opportunities and constraints for presidents and presidential candidates. In particular, I look to Ronald Reagan as a case study: as a president who came on the heels of the end of FDR’s liberal era, Reagan set the tone for a new presidential regime, consisting of particular rhetorical and policy commitments that were all shaped through his neoliberal economic policy. After identifying the rhetorical hallmarks of the neoliberal era as constructed by Reagan, I analyze the rhetorical efforts of his successor, regime articulation president George H.W. Bush, to negotiate the changing domestic and international atmosphere within the rhetorical and policy constraints of Reagan’s neoliberalism. Finally, I identify and analyze the preemptive efforts of Bill Clinton and Ross Perot during the 1992 election as they attempted to renegotiate key aspects of Reagan’s rhetorical and policy commitments to win the presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • The 1992 Elections in Virginia: a Status Quo State in the Year of Change
    Journal of Political Science Volume 21 Number 1 Article 3 November 1993 The 1992 Elections in Virginia: A Status Quo State in the Year of Change Larry J. Sabato Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Sabato, Larry J. (1993) "The 1992 Elections in Virginia: A Status Quo State in the Year of Change," Journal of Political Science: Vol. 21 : No. 1 , Article 3. Available at: https://digitalcommons.coastal.edu/jops/vol21/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Politics at CCU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Political Science by an authorized editor of CCU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE 1992 ELECTIONS IN VIRGINIA: A STATUS QUO STATE IN THE YEAR OF CHANGE Larry J. Sabato University of Virginia THE U.S. PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION The 1992 election, full of upheaval and transformation around the country, was more traditional in the Old Dominion. While the nation was ousting White House incumbent George Bush, Virginia voted to reelect him by a percentage that was Bush's sixth-best of the 50 states. 1 And in a year when many scandal­ tainted congressional incumbents stepped aside, voluntarily or through defeat, the only changes in Virginia's U. S. House line-up were forced by redistricting and one age-related retire­ ment. Much as in 1976, when southern Democrat Jimmy Carter won the presidency, Virginia resisted both regionalism and the call for change-and this time the Commonwealth was joined by most other states of the South.
    [Show full text]
  • Ap Us History Unit 2 Guide
    AP US HISTORY UNIT 14 GUIDE Covering Pageant Chapters 40-42 KEY PEOPLE Affirmative Action Jimmy Carter Reverse Discrimination Edward Kennedy Moral Majority Ronald Reagan Chappaquiddick John Anderson Reaganomics James Watt Solidarity Anwar Sadat Grenada Invasion Gary Hart Yuppies Jesse Jackson Strategic Defense Initiative Geraldine Ferraro Roe v. Wade Sandra Day O'Connor Cultural Nationalism Betty Friedan OPEC Cesar Chavez Feminism William Clinton Comparable Worth George H. W. Bush Neoconservatism Dan Quayle Immigration and Nationality Act Ross Perot Feminine Mystique Janet Reno Electronic Revolution Newt Gingrich International Economy Robert Dole Underclass John McCain Culture wars Madeleine Albright Globalization William Rehnquist Axis of Evil George W. Bush Brady Bill Osama bin Laden Columbine High School Colin Powell September 11, 2001 Saddam Hussein World Trade Center John Ashcroft Al Qaeda Arnold Schwarzenegger Taliban John Kerry Patriot Act Condoleezza Rice Enron and Worldcom Frank Lloyd Wright Dot.com business Microsoft Corporation KEY CONCEPTS Supply-Side Economics POSSIBLE ESSAY QUESTIONS 1. Ronald Reagan's "supply-side" economics, also known as Reaganomics, was a resounding success in breathing new life into the American economy. Evaluate this statement. 2. The terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were simply a consequence of the foreign policy decisions of American presidents in the preceding three decades. Assess the validity of this statement. 3. In what ways have Americans attained the right to "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness," and in what ways does it remain an incomplete task to be pursued? .
    [Show full text]
  • 160 Years of Presidential Campaigns
    Buttons, Badges and Bumper Stickers – 160 Years of Presidential Campaigns An Exhibit from the Collection of John Owen Clark November 3, 2008 to December 15, 2008 Smathers Library Exhibit Gallery – Second Floor George A. Smathers Libraries About the Collector John Clark, 59, is a seventh generation Floridian who has had a deep and abiding love of politics and history for more than 40 years. His fi rst venture into collecting was to buy both a Nixon and a Kennedy button at the North Florida Fair in Tallahassee in October, 1960. From there Clark developed a casual interest in politics which grew into a job managing several political campaigns and eventually into being the district assistant to Florida Congressman Don Fuqua, who represented Tallahassee and Gainesville. Along the way, Clark’s love for history and its preservation evolved into amassing a collection of political memorabilia specializing in Florida politics as well as presidential elections. The collection spans the mid 1850’s through the election of 2008, and includes buttons, badges, banners, posters, bumper strips, brochures, political torches and assorted 3-D items and ephemera. The collection has been exhibited extensively both nationally and in numerous forums in Florida. It has been featured in Florida Trend and as a cover story in Tallahassee Magazine as well as several newspaper articles. Clark has degrees in Political Science and Law from FSU, but is also an active Gator Booster with a son at UF and is a founding member of the UF Library’s Stewards of Florida History. He lives in Tallahassee and is a Vice President of a major New York Stock Exchange fi rm.
    [Show full text]
  • About the Perot Family
    ABOUT THE PEROT FAMILY (L-R) Carolyn Perot Rathjen, Nancy Perot Mulford, Ross Perot, Margot Perot, Ross Perot, Jr., Suzanne Perot McGee, Katherine Perot Reeves. Photo by Allison V. Smith In May 2008, the five Perot children donated $50 million to the new museum being built in Victory Park in Dallas in honor of their parents, Margot and Ross Perot. Their gift represents the greatest amount ever given to the Museum and is believed to be one of the single-largest gifts to a Dallas museum. As a result of their gift, the museum is named the Perot Museum of Nature and Science. News of the gift was made public at a press conference on May 30. Immediately following the announcement, a surprise video ran offering special words of congratulations to the Perots – everyone from kindergartners at the East Dallas Community School, who delighted the audience with their snaggle- toothed proclamations "to learn more about science and become doctors and archeologists when they grow up," to astronaut Buzz Aldrin, philanthropist Margaret McDermott, then-U.S. Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison and Pritzker Prize Laureate Thom Mayne, architect for the new Perot Museum. Also featured was epidemiologist Dr. Robert Haley, who recalled that his early interest in science was spurred by frequent visits as a child to science museums. "Margot and Ross Perot have given so much to Dallas and to thousands of worthwhile projects across America. I can think of no better legacy than a museum that inspires young people to pursue careers in science, engineering and technology," said former Dallas Mayor Tom Leppert.
    [Show full text]
  • A Critical Analysis of the Black President in Film and Television
    “WELL, IT IS BECAUSE HE’S BLACK”: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BLACK PRESIDENT IN FILM AND TELEVISION Phillip Lamarr Cunningham A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August 2011 Committee: Dr. Angela M. Nelson, Advisor Dr. Ashutosh Sohoni Graduate Faculty Representative Dr. Michael Butterworth Dr. Susana Peña Dr. Maisha Wester © 2011 Phillip Lamarr Cunningham All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Angela Nelson, Ph.D., Advisor With the election of the United States’ first black president Barack Obama, scholars have begun to examine the myriad of ways Obama has been represented in popular culture. However, before Obama’s election, a black American president had already appeared in popular culture, especially in comedic and sci-fi/disaster films and television series. Thus far, scholars have tread lightly on fictional black presidents in popular culture; however, those who have tend to suggest that these presidents—and the apparent unimportance of their race in these films—are evidence of the post-racial nature of these texts. However, this dissertation argues the contrary. This study’s contention is that, though the black president appears in films and televisions series in which his presidency is presented as evidence of a post-racial America, he actually fails to transcend race. Instead, these black cinematic presidents reaffirm race’s primacy in American culture through consistent portrayals and continued involvement in comedies and disasters. In order to support these assertions, this study first constructs a critical history of the fears of a black presidency, tracing those fears from this nation’s formative years to the present.
    [Show full text]