DOCSLIB.ORG

EL9 003 Habitats Regulations Assessment Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
EL9 003 Habitats Regulations Assessment Report WYRE BOROUGH COUNCIL LOCAL PLAN Habitats Regulations Assessment Report AUGUST 2018 CONTACTS LIZ TURLEY/ JO WEAVER (dd) +44 07809594176/185 Arcadis. (e) [email protected] / [email protected] Arcadis Consulting (UK) Limited is a private limited company registered in England & Wales (registered number 02212959). Registered Office at Arcadis House, 34 York Way, London, N1 9AB, UK. Part of the Arcadis Group of Companies along with other entities in the UK. Copyright © 2015 Arcadis. All rights reserved. arcadis.com VERSION CONTROL Version Date Author Changes 01 08/08/2016 JW First issue 02 30/08/2016 JW Comments addressed 03 01/09/2016 JW Comments finalised 04 21/04/2017 LT/JW Updated with final iteration of allocation sites 05 02/05/2017 LT/JW Update following client comments 06 21/07/2017 LT/JW Updated following NE consultation Updated following further NE consultation and Local Plan 07 05/09/2017 LT/JW updates Update following CJEU ruling and guidance from NE with 08 16/07/18 LT/JW regard to the ruling 09 28/08/2018 LT/JW Main modification update This report dated 28 August 2018 has been prepared for Wyre Borough Council (the “Client”) in accordance with the terms and conditions of appointment dated 08 June 2017(the “Appointment”) between the Client and (“Arcadis”) for the purposes specified in the Appointment. For avoidance of doubt, no other person(s) may use or rely upon this report or its contents, and Arcadis accepts no responsibility for any such use or reliance thereon by any other third party. CONTENTS VERSION CONTROL .......................................................................................................... 2 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE ............................................................................ 5 1.2 Background to the Habitats Regulations Assessment ..................................................................... 5 1.3 Legislation and Guidance .................................................................................................................... 6 2 THE LOCAL PLAN .................................................................................................... 7 2.1 Background and Purpose .................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Overall planning strategy ..................................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Settlement hierarchy ............................................................................................................................ 7 2.4 Policies within Wyre Local Plan .......................................................................................................... 8 2.5 Consultation .......................................................................................................................................... 9 3 THE HABITATS REGULATIONS ASSESSMENT PROCESS ................................ 10 3.1 Stages in HRA ..................................................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Approach to the HRA Report ............................................................................................................. 10 3.3 In combination Effects ....................................................................................................................... 11 3.4 Consideration of Effects .................................................................................................................... 13 3.5 Potential Impact Pathways ................................................................................................................ 15 4 THE EUROPEAN SITES ......................................................................................... 16 4.1 Approach to Identifying Sites ............................................................................................................ 16 4.2 European Sites within and surrounding Wyre................................................................................. 16 4.3 Conservation objectives of the European Sites .............................................................................. 16 5 SCREENING ............................................................................................................ 18 5.1 Context ................................................................................................................................................. 18 5.2 Screening Approach ........................................................................................................................... 18 5.3 Initial Screening of the Local Plan .................................................................................................... 18 6 DETAILED SCREENING OF THE LOCAL PLAN ................................................... 26 6.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 26 6.2 Potential Impact pathways ................................................................................................................. 26 6.3 Potential impacts considered in the detailed screening of the Local Plan policies and sites ... 33 6.4 Detailed Screening of the Local Plan Policies ................................................................................. 33 6.5 Detailed Screening of the Local Plan Sites ...................................................................................... 36 6.6 In combination Effects Screening of the Local Plan ....................................................................... 53 Wyre Local Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 53 6.7 Other Plans and Projects ................................................................................................................... 55 7 SCREENING SUMMARY ........................................................................................ 58 7.1 Initial Screening .................................................................................................................................. 58 7.2 Detailed Screening Conclusion ......................................................................................................... 58 7.3 In combination Screening Conclusion ............................................................................................. 60 7.4 Policies and sites considered in the Appropriate Assessment ..................................................... 61 8 APPROPRIATE ASSESSMENT OF THE POTENTIAL EFFECTS UPON EUROPEAN SITES ........................................................................................................... 62 8.1 Overview .............................................................................................................................................. 62 8.2 Fleetwood - Thornton AAP ................................................................................................................ 62 8.3 Fleetwood Docks and Marina ............................................................................................................ 64 8.4 Hillhouse Technology Enterprise Zone ............................................................................................ 68 8.5 Land at Arthurs Lane .......................................................................................................................... 71 8.6 Great Eccleston Extension ................................................................................................................ 72 8.7 In combination effects ........................................................................................................................ 73 8.8 Avoidance and Mitigation .................................................................................................................. 76 8.9 Appropriate Assessment Conclusion .............................................................................................. 76 9 OVERALL CONCLUSION ....................................................................................... 78 ..................................................................................................................... 80 Conservation Objectives and Qualifying Features ..................................................................................... 80 ..................................................................................................................... 93 Figures/ Maps/ Aerial photography .............................................................................................................. 93 ..................................................................................................................... 94 HRA of Fleetwood - Thornton AAP ............................................................................................................... 94 ..................................................................................................................... 95 Further Information Statement-Ecology. Fleetwood Fish Park ................................................................. 95 ..................................................................................................................... 96 Information from NE - Buffer distances in relation to European sites .....................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr
    26 . 3 . 84 Amtsblatt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften Nr . L 82 / 67 RICHTLINIE DES RATES vom 28 . Februar 1984 betreffend das Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten landwirtschaftlichen Gebiete im Sinne der Richtlinie 75 /268 / EWG ( Vereinigtes Königreich ) ( 84 / 169 / EWG ) DER RAT DER EUROPAISCHEN GEMEINSCHAFTEN — Folgende Indexzahlen über schwach ertragsfähige Böden gemäß Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe a ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden bei der Bestimmung gestützt auf den Vertrag zur Gründung der Euro­ jeder der betreffenden Zonen zugrunde gelegt : über päischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft , 70 % liegender Anteil des Grünlandes an der landwirt­ schaftlichen Nutzfläche , Besatzdichte unter 1 Groß­ vieheinheit ( GVE ) je Hektar Futterfläche und nicht über gestützt auf die Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG des Rates vom 65 % des nationalen Durchschnitts liegende Pachten . 28 . April 1975 über die Landwirtschaft in Berggebieten und in bestimmten benachteiligten Gebieten ( J ), zuletzt geändert durch die Richtlinie 82 / 786 / EWG ( 2 ), insbe­ Die deutlich hinter dem Durchschnitt zurückbleibenden sondere auf Artikel 2 Absatz 2 , Wirtschaftsergebnisse der Betriebe im Sinne von Arti­ kel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe b ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG wurden durch die Tatsache belegt , daß das auf Vorschlag der Kommission , Arbeitseinkommen 80 % des nationalen Durchschnitts nicht übersteigt . nach Stellungnahme des Europäischen Parlaments ( 3 ), Zur Feststellung der in Artikel 3 Absatz 4 Buchstabe c ) der Richtlinie 75 / 268 / EWG genannten geringen Bevöl­ in Erwägung nachstehender Gründe : kerungsdichte wurde die Tatsache zugrunde gelegt, daß die Bevölkerungsdichte unter Ausschluß der Bevölke­ In der Richtlinie 75 / 276 / EWG ( 4 ) werden die Gebiete rung von Städten und Industriegebieten nicht über 55 Einwohner je qkm liegt ; die entsprechenden Durch­ des Vereinigten Königreichs bezeichnet , die in dem schnittszahlen für das Vereinigte Königreich und die Gemeinschaftsverzeichnis der benachteiligten Gebiete Gemeinschaft liegen bei 229 beziehungsweise 163 .
    [Show full text]
  • Lancashire Bird Report 2003
    Lancashire & Cheshire Fauna Society Publication No. 106 Lancashire Bird Report 2003 The Birds of Lancashire and North Merseyside S. J. White (Editor) W. C. Aspin, D. A. Bickerton, A. Bunting, S. Dunstan, C. Liggett, B. McCarthy, P. J. Marsh, D. J. Rigby, J. F. Wright 2 Lancashire Bird Report 2003 CONTENTS Introduction ........................................... Dave Bickerton & Steve White ........ 3 Review of the Year ............................................................. John Wright ...... 10 Systematic List Swans & Geese ........................................................ Charlie Liggett ...... 14 Ducks ....................................................................... Dominic Rigby ...... 22 Gamebirds ........................................................................ Bill Aspin ...... 37 Divers to Cormorants ................................................... Steve White ...... 40 Herons ................................................................. Stephen Dunstan ...... 46 Birds of Prey ........................................................ Stephen Dunstan ...... 49 Rails ................................................................................. Bill Aspin ...... 55 Oystercatcher to Plovers ............................................ Andy Bunting ...... 58 Knot to Woodcock .................................................... Charlie Liggett ...... 64 Godwits to Curlew ........................................................ Steve White ...... 70 Spotted Redshank to Phalaropes .......................
    [Show full text]
  • Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS)
    Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands (RIS) Categories approved by Recommendation 4.7 (1990), as amended by Resolution VIII.13 of the 8th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2002) and Resolutions IX.1 Annex B, IX.6, IX.21 and IX. 22 of the 9th Conference of the Contracting Parties (2005). Notes for compilers: 1. The RIS should be completed in accordance with the attached Explanatory Notes and Guidelines for completing the Information Sheet on Ramsar Wetlands. Compilers are strongly advised to read this guidance before filling in the RIS. 2. Further information and guidance in support of Ramsar site designations are provided in the Strategic Framework for the future development of the List of Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Wise Use Handbook 7, 2nd edition, as amended by COP9 Resolution IX.1 Annex B). A 3rd edition of the Handbook, incorporating these amendments, is in preparation and will be available in 2006. 3. Once completed, the RIS (and accompanying map(s)) should be submitted to the Ramsar Secretariat. Compilers should provide an electronic (MS Word) copy of the RIS and, where possible, digital copies of all maps. 1. Name and address of the compiler of this form: FOR OFFICE USE ONLY. DD MM YY Joint Nature Conservation Committee Monkstone House City Road Designation date Site Reference Number Peterborough Cambridgeshire PE1 1JY UK Telephone/Fax: +44 (0)1733 – 562 626 / +44 (0)1733 – 555 948 Email: [email protected] 2. Date this sheet was completed/updated: Designated: 16 February 1995 3. Country: UK (England) 4. Name of the Ramsar site: Ribble and Alt Estuaries 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashleigh Farm, Head Dyke Lane, Preesall, Lancashire Landscape
    Yew Tree and Gardens Client: Mr & Mrs Danson. –Ashleigh Farm, Head Dyke Lane, Preesall, Lancashire Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment Prepared by Yew Tree+Gardens Yew Tree House Hale, Milnthorpe Cumbria LA7 7BJ 015395 63527 07813 897631 [email protected] 19/01/2021 CONTENTS 1. Introduction ...................................................................................... 2 2. Relevant Landscape Policies ................................................................ 3 3. Site, Setting and Landscape Context .................................................... 4 4. Development Proposals....................................................................... 7 5. Viewpoints ........................................................................................ 8 6. Character assessment ...................................................................... 12 7. Conclusion ...................................................................................... 14 8. Methodology ................................................................................... 16 Appendix 1 - Image Location Map Appendix 2 - Images Appendix 3 - Visual Impacts Table Appendix 4 - Landscape Baseline Effects Table Appendix 5 – Proposed Site Landscaping Layout Ref: Ashleigh Farm Dwelling_LVIA 19/01/2021 Page 1 19/01/2021 1. Introduction a. This document is intended to provide a landscape and visual impact assessment in relation to the proposed residential development at the site currently occupied by Ashleigh Farm, Head Dyke Lane, Preesall, Lancashire.
    [Show full text]
  • Waste and Recycling Collection Services Task Group
    APPENDIX 1 ITEM 6 C Waste and Recycling Collection Services Task Group - Draft Report - Chairman: Councillor Paul Moon Task Group Members: Councillor Ian Amos Councillor Rita Amos Councillor Howard Ballard Councillor John Hodgkinson Councillor John Ibison Councillor Tom Ingham Councillor Patsy Ormrod Councillor Ann Turner Overview & Scrutiny Committee Chairman: Councillor Michael Vincent 1 Contents Introduction Page 3 Aims of review Page 4 The review process Page 4 Summary of evidence provided by Page 5 Councillor David Henderson, Street Scene, Parks and Open Spaces Portfolio Holder, Mark Billington, Service Director People and Places, and Ruth Hunter, Waste and Recycling Manager Summary of evidence provided by Steve Scott, Head of Waste Page 7 Management, Lancashire County Council Summary of evidence provided by Shaun Donohue, Regional Page 10 Operations Manager, and Damian Bigley, Contract Manager, Veolia Summary of evidence provided by Alan Fitzpatrick, Waste and Page 12 Recycling Officer Summary of evidence provided by Clare James, Head of Finance Page 12 Conclusions Page 13 Recommendations Page 15 Councillors’ attendances Page 16 List of appendices Page 17 Appendices Page 18 2 Introduction Wyre Council has a contract with Veolia for waste and recycling collection services which was initially for eight years from 2012, with an option to extend for a further eight years from April 2020. The Overview and Scrutiny Committee commissioned a task group to consider options for the delivery of the waste and recycling collection services beyond April 2020. If any changes are to be made to the contract, or if it is to be re-tendered, a lengthy lead-in period will be required, hence the need to commence those discussions now.
    [Show full text]
  • Beck Farm, Rocks Lane Burniston YO13 0HX an Exceptional Stone Built Farmhouse in the Outskirts of Burniston
    Burniston YO13 0HX YO13 Burniston Beck Farm, Rocks Lane Rocks Farm, Beck You may download, store and use the material for your own personal use and research. You may not republish, retransmit, redistribute or otherwise make the material available to any party or make the same available on any website, online service or bulletin board of your own or of any other party or make the same available in hard copy or in any other media without the website owner's express prior written consent. The website owner's copyright must remain on all reproductions of material taken from this website. An exceptional stone built farmhouse in the outskirts of Burniston • Exceptional Stone Farmhouse • Three Double Bedrooms • Character Features • Beautiful Rural Position 25 Northway, Scarborough, • Gas Central Heating North Yorkshire, YO11 1JH • Available Now 01723 341557 • Unfurnished [email protected] • Council Tax Band E £1,100 Per calendar month www.harris-shieldscollection.uk Description Beck Farmhouse is a stunning and spacious stone built home retaining many character features yet boasting a contemporary interior. Part of the Duchy Of Lancaster's Cloughton Estate, it is set within a semi rural and tranquil position within the sought-after village of Burniston. The property benefits from gas central heating and part double glazing. The accommodation briefly comprises; entrance hall with under-stairs cupboard, large fitted kitchen/dining room with integrated washing machine and dish-washer, separate utility room leading to a WC. Formal dining area and sitting room with log burner. On the first floor are three generously sized double bedrooms and a large bathroom with white three piece suite and separate shower.
    [Show full text]
  • International Passenger Survey, 2008
    UK Data Archive Study Number 5993 - International Passenger Survey, 2008 Airline code Airline name Code 2L 2L Helvetic Airways 26099 2M 2M Moldavian Airlines (Dump 31999 2R 2R Star Airlines (Dump) 07099 2T 2T Canada 3000 Airln (Dump) 80099 3D 3D Denim Air (Dump) 11099 3M 3M Gulf Stream Interntnal (Dump) 81099 3W 3W Euro Manx 01699 4L 4L Air Astana 31599 4P 4P Polonia 30699 4R 4R Hamburg International 08099 4U 4U German Wings 08011 5A 5A Air Atlanta 01099 5D 5D Vbird 11099 5E 5E Base Airlines (Dump) 11099 5G 5G Skyservice Airlines 80099 5P 5P SkyEurope Airlines Hungary 30599 5Q 5Q EuroCeltic Airways 01099 5R 5R Karthago Airlines 35499 5W 5W Astraeus 01062 6B 6B Britannia Airways 20099 6H 6H Israir (Airlines and Tourism ltd) 57099 6N 6N Trans Travel Airlines (Dump) 11099 6Q 6Q Slovak Airlines 30499 6U 6U Air Ukraine 32201 7B 7B Kras Air (Dump) 30999 7G 7G MK Airlines (Dump) 01099 7L 7L Sun d'Or International 57099 7W 7W Air Sask 80099 7Y 7Y EAE European Air Express 08099 8A 8A Atlas Blue 35299 8F 8F Fischer Air 30399 8L 8L Newair (Dump) 12099 8Q 8Q Onur Air (Dump) 16099 8U 8U Afriqiyah Airways 35199 9C 9C Gill Aviation (Dump) 01099 9G 9G Galaxy Airways (Dump) 22099 9L 9L Colgan Air (Dump) 81099 9P 9P Pelangi Air (Dump) 60599 9R 9R Phuket Airlines 66499 9S 9S Blue Panorama Airlines 10099 9U 9U Air Moldova (Dump) 31999 9W 9W Jet Airways (Dump) 61099 9Y 9Y Air Kazakstan (Dump) 31599 A3 A3 Aegean Airlines 22099 A7 A7 Air Plus Comet 25099 AA AA American Airlines 81028 AAA1 AAA Ansett Air Australia (Dump) 50099 AAA2 AAA Ansett New Zealand (Dump)
    [Show full text]
  • Tackling High Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund Full
    Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION The Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd is a transport policy and research organisation which explores the economic, mobility, safety and environmental issues relating to roads and their users. The Foundation publishes independent and authoritative research with which it promotes informed debate and advocates policy in the interest of the responsible motorist. RAC Foundation 89–91 Pall Mall London SW1Y 5HS Tel no: 020 7747 3445 www.racfoundation.org Registered Charity No. 1002705 October 2018 © Copyright Royal Automobile Club Foundation for Motoring Ltd Mobility • Safety • Economy • Environment Tackling High-Risk Regional Roads Safer Roads Fund 2017/2018 FO UND Dr Suzy Charman Road Safety Foundation October 2018 AT ION About the Road Safety Foundation The Road Safety Foundation is a UK charity advocating road casualty reduction through simultaneous action on all three components of the safe road system: roads, vehicles and behaviour. The charity has enabled work across each of these components and has published several reports which have provided the basis of new legislation, government policy or practice. For the last decade, the charity has focused on developing the Safe Systems approach, and in particular leading the establishment of the European Road Assessment Programme (EuroRAP) in the UK and, through EuroRAP, the global UK-based charity International Road Assessment Programme (iRAP). Since the inception of EuroRAP in 1999, the Foundation has been the UK member responsible for managing the programme in the UK (and, more recently, Ireland), ensuring that these countries provide a global model of what can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Site Assessments
    SHELAA Site Assessments Scarborough Borough Council February 2015 1 Contents Final SHELAA Calculations by Area 3 Site Assessments by Area 4 - Reighton and Speeton 4 - Hunmanby 11 - Filey 17 - Folkton / Flixton 24 - Muston 25 - Gristhorpe 26 - Lebberston 27 - Cayton 28 - Scarborough 37 - Newby and Scalby 45 - Osgodby 50 - Eastfield 51 - Seamer 54 - Irton 61 - East / West Ayton 62 - Wykeham / Ruston 65 - Snainton 68 - Burniston 72 - Cloughton 76 - Whitby 81 - Eskdaleside 88 Sites Post 2030 90 Sites taken out of SHELAA for 2014 Update 124 Maps of Sites by Area - Reighton and Speeton - Hunmanby - Filey and Muston - Folkton and Flixton - Gristhorpe - Eastfield, Cayton and Lebberston - Scarborough (Map 1) - Scarborough (Map 2) - Newby and Scalby - Seamer, Irton, East and West Ayton - Wykeham, Brompton, Ruston and Snainton - Cloughton and Burniston - Whitby and Sleights *Please note that the references in this document are different to those in subsequent LDP/Local Plan documents as sites have been combined to reduce the overall number of assessments. The site references which correspond to the LDF/Local Plan have been included for clarity and cross reference purposes 2 Final SHELAA Calculations by Settlement Area Housing Land1 Employment Land2 0-5 Years 6-10 Years 11 - 16 Years Beyond 2030 0-17 Years Beyond 2030 Reighton 0 0 592 0 - - Hunmanby 0 182 275 184 24,500 - Filey 52 53 490 0 - - Folkton / Flixton 0 0 10 150 - - Muston 12 0 0 48 - - Gristhorpe 45 0 0 0 - - Lebberston 0 0 26 0 - - Cayton 95 1533 1835 503 80,500 - Osgodby 58 0 0 0 - -
    [Show full text]
  • Central Lancashire Core Strategy
    Local Development Framework Central Lancashire Core Strategy Revised Habitat Regulations Screening Assessment Report November 2011 This page is intentionally left blank Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION Page Number Background 1 Habitat Regulations Assessment Process 1 Natura 2000 Sites 2 Report Structure 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF PLAN North West Regional Spatial Strategy 3 Central Lancashire Core Strategy 3 Strategic Objectives 3 - 4 Core Strategy Policies/ Summaries 3 - 13 3. IDENTIFICATION AND DESCRIPTION OF SITES Introduction 14 Methodology 14 - 15 Identification of Natura 2000 Sites 14 - 17 4. ANALYSIS OF POTENTIAL IMPACTS/ PATHWAYS Direct Development 18 Air Quality 18 Water Quality 18 Hydrology 18 Water Supply 18 Habitat Species/ Disturbance 18 Recreational/ Visitor Pressure 18 Pathways 19 5. ASSESSMENT OF LIKELY SIGNIFICANT EFFECTS Core Strategy Policies Matrix's 20 - 23 Assessment with Other Plans 24 6. CONCLUSIONS Page Number Conclusions 25 APPENDICES Appendix 1 Description of Natura 2000 Sites 26 - 31 Appendix 2 Core Strategy Policies Initial Assessment Screening Matrix 32 - 50 Appendix 2a Core Strategy Policies Initial Assessment Screening Matrix 51 - 52 (changes post Examination in Public June/ July 2011) Appendix 3 Core Strategy Policies Potential Impacts 53 - 65 Avoidance/ Mitigation Matrix Appendix 3a Core Strategy Policies Potential Impacts Avoidance/ 66 - 70 Mitigation Matrix (changes post Examination in Public June/ July 2011) Appendix 4 'Other Plans' 71 - 78 1. INTRODUCTION Background 1.1 The Central Lancashire Core Strategy is a Development Plan Document (DPD) which will set out the vision, strategic objectives, general principles and the strategy for development and protection of land within Central Lancashire, until 2026. The Core Strategy forms part of the statutory development plan for Central Lancashire which includes the Districts of Chorley, South Ribble and Preston and once adopted will become the main DPD within the wider suite of planning policy documents; the Local Development Framework (LDF).
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Medieval Colonisation in the Forests of Howland, Knaresborough and Pickering
    THE UNIVERSITY OF HULL POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF HOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING being a Thesis submitted for the Degree of Ph.D. in the University of Hull by MAURICE TURNER, B.Sc., B.A., OCTOBER, 1987 POST-MEDIEVAL COLONISATION IN THE FORESTS OF BOWLAND, KNARESBOROUGH AND PICKERING Contents Preface Chapter I The material of the thesis and the methods of Page 1 investigation Chapter II The medieval background to encroachment Page 7 a) The utilisation of forest land b) The nature of medieval clearance c) Early clearances in the Forest of Pickering d) Medieval colonisation in Bowland Forest e) Migration into Knaresborough Forest after the Black Death f) The medieval settlement pattern in Knaresborough Forest g) Measures of forest land Chapter III Tenures, Rents and Taxes in the Tudor Forests Page 36 a) The evidence of the Tudor Lay Subsidies b) The evidence of manorial rent rolls C) Tudor encroachment on the common wastes Chapter IV The demographic experience of forest Page 53 parishes Chapter V The reasons for encroachment Page 73 a) The problem of poverty in 17th century England b) The evidence for subdivision of holdings c) Changes in the size of tenements with time d) Subdivided holdings in Forests other than Knaresborough Chapter VI Illegal encroachment in the Forest of Knaresborough Page 96 a) The creation of new hamlets 1600 - 1669 b) The slowing down of encroachment in the late 17th century c) The physical form of squatter encroachments as compared to copyholder intakes before 1730 Chapter VII Alternative
    [Show full text]
  • Where to Buy Fresh, Local Organic Food and Drink in the Northwest Cheshire, Cumbria, Greater Manchester, Lancashire and Merseyside
    Local and Organic Where to buy fresh, local organic food and drink in the Northwest Cheshire, Cumbria, Greater Manchester, Lancashire and Merseyside Soil Association Welcome to your guide to fresh, local organic food and drink produced in Northwest England – Cheshire, Cumbria, Greater Manchester, Lancashire and Merseyside Organic farmers in the Northwest, like everywhere else, work to strict organic principles ensuring that they farm to develop healthy soil, crops and livestock. The principles are called Organic Standards, which are EU regulated. The use of the term ‘organic’, when applied to food, has a legal meaning and the Standards cover every stage of organic food production, processing and distribution, from farm to shop. This is what organic So how do I know production means: if it’s organic? • Artificial fertilisers, herbicides, • Make sure the word ‘organic’ pesticides and genetically modified is on the label. organisms [GMOs] are not used in the farming system. • Check out the logo. The logos shown below are those • There is no routine use of drugs, that appear on products licensed antibiotics or wormers, but some by the UK certification bodies, veterinary medicines may be used to but imported products may ensure animal welfare needs are met, carry different logos. and no animal suffers. • The word organic and the logo • Within an organic system the animals show that the farm and processor have a larger grazing and lounging area. have been inspected annually to ensure they comply with the Standards • Organic processed food does not contain and that they have a certificate that hydrogenated fat, artificial flavourings, you can ask to see.
    [Show full text]