DOCSLIB.ORG

ALLEG.100 O 1.0.1 =++ Atlas of the Imperium

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
ALLEG.100 O 1.0.1 =++ Atlas of the Imperium ++=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-ALLEG.100 O_1.0.1 =++ Atlas of the Imperium (Second Survey)/MTAv1&2 (non-Vargr)/MTJ4: --------------------------------------------------------------- A0 Yerlyaruiwo Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A1 Khaukeairl Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A2 Syoisuis Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A3 Tralyeaeawi Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A4 Eakhtiyho Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A5 Hlyueawi/Isoitiyro Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A6 Uiktawa Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A7 Ikhtealyo Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A8 Seieakh Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE A9 Aokhalte Tlaukhu Bloc HIERATE Ak* Akeena Union Gateway Ak* Auftei Ktaih Hanstone Am Amondiage Reft Ar Aoiftu Roakh Banners As Aslan Hierate/Colonies HIERATE Aw Yehaso Clan (Aslan) Reaver's Deep Av Avalar Consulate (Foreven/The Beyond) Bs* Belgardian Sojourn Trojan Reach Bs* Bright Star Cooperate Malorn Ca* Principality of Caledon (see Cp) ARCHAIC Reaver's Deep Cb Carrillian Assembly Reaver's Deep Cd Confederation of Duncinae Reaver's Deep Ch Union of Chapet The Old Expanses Cl Corellian League/Colony (The Beyond/Vanguard Reaches) Cn Creation of Nonpareil (Malorn/Hadji) Cp Principality of Caledon Reaver's Deep (TTC) Cs Client State (Imperial) IMPERIUM+ Ct Carter Technocracy Reaver's Deep Da Darrian Confederation The Spinward Marches Dc Delsun Comagistrant Banners Dd Domain of Deneb DENEB Dg* Reaver's Deep Dg* Dienabach Gru\pen Neworld (u\ = u umlaut) Dj Daprolix Juncture of Suns Malorn Dn Demos of Nobles Neworld Dr Droyne The Spinward Marches Dt Duchy of Trelyn (Far Frontiers/Vanguard Reach.) En En Liverech The Old Expanses Es* Eslyat Vanguard Reaches Es* Esperanza Reft Et Etra Hfiywitir Fa* Federation of Arden The Spinward Marches Fd Federation of Daibei (Daibei) Fg Federation of Garrone The Beyond Fl Florian League Trojan Reach/The Beyond Fo Fteiheiel Oih Hanstone Ga* Galian Federation Gateway Ga* Gralyn Assemblage Reaver's Deep Gd Grand Duchy of Douglas (Caledonian) Reaver's Deep (LWLG) Gf Glimmerdrift Spread Glimmerdrift Reaches Gk Khan World League Reaver's Deep Gl Glorious Empire Trojan Reach Go Gerontacrcy of Ormine/Gyj-nuah 'Oew Dark Nebula Gr* Gazala Cooperative/Colony Glimmerdrift Reaches Gt Great Terbah Malorn Hc* Council of Heads Hanstone Hl Hegemony of Lorean Empty Quarter Ho Hochiken People's Assembly Gateway Hv Hive Federation FEDERATION Hy Hreahiyouea Fahreahluis Id Islaiat Dominate Reaver's Deep If Iyeaao'fte Ustral Quadrant Im Third Imperium IMPERIUM Jd Joie De Vivre Malorn Jf Jonson-Bowes Federation Hadji Jn Jurisdiction of Nadon (Hanstone/Canopus) Jo* Joyeuse Reft Jr* Julian Protectorate (Amdukan) Ke Katanga Empire The Beyond Kk The Two Thousand Worlds (K'kree) KKREE Kl Khuur League Ley Ko Khosarliyh Hfiywitir Kt Ktouho'as Fahreahluis La League of Antares Antares Lv Lords of Vision Malorn Ly Lanyard Colonies Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) Ma* Grand Duchy of Marlheim (see Mh) ARCHAIC Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) Ma* Margaret's Stronghold (Delphi) Me Megusard Corporate Gateway Mh Grand Duchy of Marlheim Reaver's Deep (MTAv2) Mk Marrakesh Trade Association The Beyond Mu* Malorn Union (Malorn) – Solomani? Mu* Murian Vanguard Reaches Na Non-Aligned (Human) IMPERIUM+ Nb Neubayern Reft Nc* New Colchis Reft Nc* Nakris Confederation The Beyond Nh New Home Reft Oc (Oceanus?) Reaver's Deep Of Oleaiy'fte Ustral Quadrant Ok (? Kolath?) Reaver's Deep Pb Parity of Brothers (Malorn/Hadji) Pl Plavian League Gateway Po Portine League The Old Expanses Pu Purity Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) Ra Ral Ranta Hinterworlds Re* Renkard Union Gateway Rm Regency of Muirimi (Iphigenaia/Theron) Sa* Sansterre Reft Sa* Sea'ai'teluarliyh Fahreahluis Sa* Saul Empire Glimmerdrift Reaches Sb* Serendip Belt Reft Se Steaak'heafera (Irlaftalea/Hfiywitir) Sf Senlis Foederate Trojan Reach Sh Steaakh Hlaia Ahkiweahi Sl Slovenian Protectorate Glimmerdrift Reaches So Solomani Confederation SOLOMANI Sw* Swanfei Free Worlds Gateway Sw* Sword Worlds Confederation The Spinward Marches Sy* Sylean Federation Core Sy* Steaakh Yeasaol Hfiywitir Ta* Reaver's Deep Ta* Tealou Arlaoh (Uistilrao/Ustral Quadrant) Tb Trita Brotherhood Canopus Tr* Toh Republic Malorn Tr* Trindel Confederacy Gateway Tw Theocracy of Weltschmerz Malorn Uh Ulane Hierate (Union of Harmony) (Reaver's Deep/Dark Nebula) Um Union of Melzirn The Beyond Va Vargr (Non-Aligned) VARGR Ve* Vegan Autonomous District Solomani Rim Vi* Viyard Concourse Gateway Wc Counsel of the Wise Hadji Wd Winston Democracy (Hadji) Ww Woal Warliylr Banners Zh Zhodani Consulate/Colonies ZHODANI Zl Pa'an (Zhodani Client) Trojan Reach Alien Module 3-Vargr codes: --------------------------- Vd* Dzen Aeng Kho (Society of Equals) Gvurrdon Ve* Ekhelle Ksafi (40th Squadron) Gvurrdon Vg* Gaerr Thue (Pact of Gaerr) Gvurrdon Vk Kedzudh Aeng (Commonality of Kedzudh) Gvurrdon Vn* Rukh Aegz (Worlds of Leader Rukh) Gvurrdon Vp* Thirz Uerra (Thirz Empire) (Gvurrdon/Usingou) Vr* Gnoerrgh Rukh Lloell (Anti-Rukh Coalition) Gvurrdon Vs Saeknouth Igz (Saeknouth Dependency) Gvurrdon Vt Thoengling Raghz (Thoengling Empire) (Gvurrdon/Tuglikki) Vu* Urukhu (Nation of Urukhu) Gvurrdon codes (I forget the source) as assigned by ?: --------------------------------------------- Bv The Biumvirate Far Frontiers Dh Descarothe Hegemony Far Frontiers Fs Federation of Alsas Far Frontiers Hc* Haladon Cooperative Far Frontiers Ls The League of Suns Far Frontiers Pr* The Protectorate Far Frontiers Sc* Salinaikin Concordance Far Frontiers Td The Trelyn Domain Far Frontiers Ug The Union of Garth Far Frontiers Za Domain of Alntzar Far Frontiers Zc* Colonade Administration District (Far Frontiers/Vanguard Reach.) Zf The Four Worlds Far Frontiers Zm Mnemosyne Principality Far Frontiers Zp The Zelphic Primacy Far Frontiers post Fifth Frontier War allegiances: ------------------------------------ Bw Border Worlds The Spinward Marches Sw* Sword Worlds Confederation The Spinward Marches SW Sword Worlds Union The Spinward Marches Useful additional codings: -------------------------- A# Aslan Tlaukhu Clan (# is a number) HIERATE A* Aslan Clan (* is a letter) HIERATE H* Hiver Client/Component (* is a character) FEDERATION J* Julian Protectorate (* is a character) Mendan/Meshan/Amdukan V* Vargr (* is a letter) VARGR Z* Zhodani Client (* is a letter) ZHODANI Hinterworlds codes (Challenge 39): ---------------------------------- Ac* Anubian Trade Coalition Hinterworlds Cu Cytrialin Unity (Hinterworlds) Gi Gniivi (Hinterworlds) Lp Council of Leh Perash (Hinterworlds) Ow Outcasts of the Whispering Sky Hinterworlds Ra Ral Ranta Hinterworlds Factions of the Rebellion codes: -------------------------------- Dd Domain of Deneb DENEB Fd Federation of Daibei IMPERIUM Fi Federation of Ilelish IMPERIUM La League of Antares IMPERIUM Li Lucan's Imperium IMPERIUM Ma* Margaret IMPERIUM Rv Ziru Sirka IMPERIUM St Strephon's Imperium IMPERIUM Hard Times states/regions ------------------------- Fr Frontier tzone Ou Outlands tzone Wi Wilds tzone Ac* Khavle Accordment Diaspora (AGD) Bc Backman Cluster Diaspora Ca* Alurzan Cartel Diaspora Du Duwamish League Diaspora Ec Ecclesiasty of Narquel Diaspora Fd Federation of Daibei (Daibei) Hd Hewes Dyad Diaspora (LWLG) Ju* Vassalry Judiciate Diaspora Kh Khavle Accordment (see Ac) ARCHAIC Diaspora (HT) No New Order Vigilance Alliance Diaspora Pr* Unity of Promise Diaspora Rs Rintarna Economic Sphere Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) Sb* Bootean Federation Solomani Rim So Solomani Confederation SOLOMANI Un Union of Sufren Diaspora New Era codes: (u) = unpublished -------------------------------- -- Barren World in the Wilds Diaspora Ae Aellelaek Ksafi (u) Windhorn (LWLG) Ca* Confederation of Antares Lishun CH Hiver Client State (u) The Old Expanses (GEO) Cs Client State (X-Imperial, Regency) (u) DENEB (LWLG) Da Daryen Confederation (r) The Spinward Marches (LWLG) DL Dingir League (u) Solomani Rim (HDH) Dp Duchy of Pendang Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) Dr Droyne The Spinward Marches (LWLG) Fa* Federation of Arden The Spinward Marches (LWLG) GC Gram Confederation (u) The Spinward Marches (LWLG) Gc Gotsdzo Uerra Client State (u) Windhorn (LWLG) Gr* Grendal Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) GU Gotsdzo Uerra (u) Windhorn (LWLG) Gu Gralyn Union Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) H* Hiver Star Patterns Trading (u) YOUNG WORLDS (LWLG) Hb Hub Worlds Massilia Hf Hive FDA Uplift/Observation Site (u) FEDERATION (LWLG) Hv Hive Federation FEDERATION (LWLG) Ie Iltharan Empire Reaver's Deep (TNE-P) Ka Kidunal Abeyance (u) Kidunal (LWLG) Na Non-aligned IMPERIUM+ NS New Sacnoth Dominate (u) The Spinward Marches (LWLG) NU Narsil Union (u) The Spinward Marches (LWLG) RC Reformation Coalition RC (The Old Expanses) Rc Reformation Coalition Client State (u) RC (HDH) Re* Regency of Deneb DENEB Sp The Spartan Empire (u)(Massilia/Delphi) (SDM) Su Covenant of Sufren Diaspora SW Sword Worlds (r) The Spinward Marches (LWLG) Ta* Taskaeri Nation (u) Glimmerdrift Reaches (J_F) Tc Terran Republic Client State (u) Solomani Rim (HDH) TR Terran Republic (u) Solomani Rim (HDH) TV Voskl Trade Alliance (u) The Old Expanses (GEO) Ur Uris League (u) Glimmerdrift Reaches (J_F) Va Vargr world (u) The Spinward Marches (LWLG) Vr* Vargr Worlds in the Regency (u) DENEB (LWLG) Wi Wilds (uses special TNE governments) IMPERIUM+ Xh Hive FDA extra-Federation operation (u) FEDERATION (LWLG) Zh Zhodani Consulate (u) The Spinward Marches (LWLG) Gvurrdon/HIWG Quadrant I ((Myhre-NE)++): ---------------------------------------- Dr Droyne (Gvurrdon) Va Vargr Non-aligned (Gvurrdon) Vb* Thirz Empire (Usingou/Gvurrdon) Vc* Dzen Aeng Kho (Society of Equals) Gvurrdon Vd* Noerrgh Confederate Gvurrdon Ve* Thoengling Raghz (Thoengling Empire) Gvurrdon Vf* Ongue
Load more

Recommended publications
  • War and the Constitutional Text John C
    War and the Constitutional Text John C. Yoo∗ In a series of articles, I have criticized the view that the original under- standing of the Constitution requires that Congress provide its authorization before the United States can engage in military hostilities.1 This “pro- Congress” position ignores the constitutional text and structure, errs in in- terpreting the ratification history of the Constitution, and cannot account for the practice of the three branches of government. Instead of the rigid proc- ess advocated by scholars such as Louis Henkin, John Hart Ely, Louis Fisher, Michael Glennon, and Harold Koh,2 I have argued that the Constitu- tion creates a flexible system of war powers. That system provides the president with significant initiative as commander-in-chief, while reserving to Congress ample authority to check executive policy through its power of the purse. In this scheme, the Declare War Clause confers on Congress a ju- ridical power, one that both defines the state of international legal relations ∗ Professor of Law, University of California at Berkeley School of Law (Boalt Hall) (on leave); Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, United States Department of Justice. The views expressed here are those of the author alone and do not represent the views of the Department of Justice. I express my deep appreciation for the advice and assistance of James C. Ho in preparing this response. Robert Delahunty, Jack Goldsmith, and Sai Prakash provided helpful comments on the draft. 1 See John C. Yoo, Kosovo, War Powers, and the Multilateral Future, 148 U Pa L Rev 1673, 1686–1704 (2000) (discussing the original understanding of war powers in the context of the Kosovo conflict); John C.
    [Show full text]
  • Prince Edward Island and Confederation 1863-1873
    CCHA, Report, 28 (1961), 25-30 Prince Edward Island and Confederation 1863-1873 Francis William Pius BOLGER, Ph.D. St. Dunstan’s University, Charlottetown The idea of Confederation did not receive serious consideration in Prince Edward Island prior to the year 1863. Ten more years elapsed before the subject of union with the British North American Colonies moved into the non-academic and practical sphere. The position of the Island in the Confederation negotiations illustrated in large measure the characteristics of its politics and its attitude to distant administrations. This attitude might best be described simply as a policy of exclusiveness. The history of the Confederation negotiations in Prince Edward Island consisted of the interplay of British, Canadian, and Maritime influences upon this policy. It is the purpose of this paper to tell the story of Confederation in Prince Edward Island from 1863 to 1873. The policy of exclusiveness, which characterized Prince Erward Island’s attitude to Confederation, was clearly revealed in the political arena. The Islanders had a profound respect for local self-government. They enjoyed their political independence, particularly after the attainment of responsible government in 1851, and did not wish to see a reduction in the significance of their local institutions. They realized, moreover, that they would have an insignificant voice in a centralized legislature, and as a result they feared that their local needs would be disregarded. Finally, previous frustrating experience with the Imperial government with respect to the settlement of the land question on the Island had taught the Islanders that it was extremely hazardous to trust the management of local problems to distant and possibly unsympathetic administrations.
    [Show full text]
  • What Was the Iroquois Confederacy?
    04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 82 What was the 4 Iroquois Confederacy? Chapter Focus Questions •What was the social structure of Iroquois society? •What opportunities did people have to participate in decision making? •What were the ideas behind the government of the Iroquois Confederacy? The last chapter explored the government of ancient Athens. This chapter explores another government with deep roots in history: the Iroquois Confederacy. The Iroquois Confederacy formed hundreds of years ago in North America — long before Europeans first arrived here. The structure and principles of its government influenced the government that the United States eventually established. The Confederacy united five, and later six, separate nations. It had clear rules and procedures for making decisions through representatives and consensus. It reflected respect for diversity and a belief in the equality of people. Pause The image on the side of this page represents the Iroquois Confederacy and its five original member nations. It is a symbol as old as the Confederacy itself. Why do you think this symbol is still honoured in Iroquois society? 82 04 AB6 Ch 4.11 4/2/08 11:22 AM Page 83 What are we learning in this chapter? Iroquois versus Haudenosaunee This chapter explores the social structure of Iroquois There are two names for society, which showed particular respect for women and the Iroquois people today: for people of other cultures. Iroquois (ear-o-kwa) and Haudenosaunee It also explores the structure and processes of Iroquois (how-den-o-show-nee). government. Think back to Chapter 3, where you saw how Iroquois is a name that the social structure of ancient Athens determined the way dates from the fur trade people participated in its government.
    [Show full text]
  • Splitting Sovereignty: the Legislative Power and the Constitution's Federation of Independent States
    Splitting Sovereignty: The Legislative Power and the Constitution's Federation of Independent States JAMES T. KNIGHT II* ABSTRACT From the moment the Constitutional Convention of 1787 ended and the Framers presented their plan to ªform a more perfect Union,º people have debated what form of government that union established. Had the thirteen sepa- rate states surrendered their independence to form a new state stretching from New England to Georgia, or was their individual sovereignty preserved as in the Articles of Confederation? If the states remained sovereign in some respect, what did that mean for the new national government? I propose that the original Constitution would have been viewed as establish- ing a federation of independent, sovereign states. The new federation possessed certain limited powers delegated to it by the states, but it lacked a broad power to legislate for the general welfare and the protection of individual rights. This power, termed ªthe legislative powerº by Enlightenment thinkers, was viewed as the essential, identifying power of a sovereign state under the theoretical framework of eighteenth-century political philosophy. The state constitutions adopted prior to the national Constitutional Convention universally gave their governments this broad legislative power rather than enumerate speci®c areas where the government could legislate. Of the constitutional documents adopted prior to the federal Constitution, only the Articles of Confederation provides such an enumeration. In this note, I argue that, against the background of political theory and con- stitutional precedent, a government lacking the full legislative power would not have been viewed as sovereign in its own right.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2017 ITUC Global Rights Index the WORLD's WORST
    THE WORLD'S WORST COUNTRIES FOR WORKERS The 2017 ITUC Global Rights Index | 4 The International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC) is a confederation of national trade union centres, each of which links trade unions of that particular country. It was established on 1 November 2006, bringing together the organisations which were formerly affiliated to the ICFTU and WCL (both now dissolved) as well as a number of national trade union centres which had no international affiliation at the time. The new Confederation has 340 affiliated organisations in 163 countries and territories on all five continents, with a membership of 181 million, 40 per cent of whom are women. It is also a partner in “Global Unions” together with the Trade Union Advisory Committee to the OECD and the Global Union Federations (GUFs) which link together national unions from a particular trade or industry at international level. The ITUC has specialised offices in a number of countries around the world, and has General Consultative Status with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. The 2017 ITUC Global Rights Index | 6 Foreword .............................................9 ASIA .................................................. 70 Bangladesh ....................................... 71 Part I ..................................................13 Cambodia .......................................... 71 The 2017 Results ...............................14 China ................................................ 72 The ITUC Global Rights Index ...............19 Fiji
    [Show full text]
  • Varieties of Patron-Client State Relationship
    Varieties of Patron-Client State Relationship: The U.S. and Southeast Asia Hojung Do Ewha Womans University The United States (US) was one of the two superpowers during the Cold War and after the eventual demise of Soviet Union, consolidated its supremacy as sole hegemon of the world. US relations with many regions and many states have been extensively studied upon and in Asia, the relationship mostly dealt with China, Japan and South Korea. US patron relationship to Northeast Asia is relatively stable, durable, one consisting of visible and tangible security transactions such as military bases still stationed in South Korea and Japan. There is a wealth of literature to be found pertaining to Northeast Asia but US relationship with Southeast Asia is lacking compared to its neighbors. This paper starts with the following questions: Does a patron-client state relationship actually exist between the US Southeast Asia? Why is there a lack of patronage compared to one displayed in Northeast Asia? Is there room for maneuver for clients? How does US patronage change over time and in what way? The first part of this paper will briefly review previous literature on patron-client relationships. Second, key concepts of patron-client state relationships and the 6 types of relationships will be enumerated. Third, these relationships will be applied to three periods: 1965-67, 1975, 1985-87 in three countries: Indonesia, Philippines and Thailand to examine the trend of US patronage. Finally, implications and future modifications of this theory to Southeast Asia will be discussed. Patron-Client Relationship in Literature Patron-client relationship is not a fresh concept in the eyes of anthropology, sociology and even politics.
    [Show full text]
  • Durham E-Theses
    Durham E-Theses A study of the client kings in the early Roman period Everatt, J. D. How to cite: Everatt, J. D. (1972) A study of the client kings in the early Roman period, Durham theses, Durham University. Available at Durham E-Theses Online: http://etheses.dur.ac.uk/10140/ Use policy The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that: • a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in Durham E-Theses • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders. Please consult the full Durham E-Theses policy for further details. Academic Support Oce, Durham University, University Oce, Old Elvet, Durham DH1 3HP e-mail: [email protected] Tel: +44 0191 334 6107 http://etheses.dur.ac.uk .UNIVERSITY OF DURHAM Department of Classics .A STUDY OF THE CLIENT KINSS IN THE EARLY ROMAN EMPIRE J_. D. EVERATT M.A. Thesis, 1972. M.A. Thesis Abstract. J. D. Everatt, B.A. Hatfield College. A Study of the Client Kings in the early Roman Empire When the city-state of Rome began to exert her influence throughout the Mediterranean, the ruling classes developed friendships and alliances with the rulers of the various kingdoms with whom contact was made.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Hope U.S
    Killing Hope U.S. Military and CIA Interventions Since World War II – Part I William Blum Zed Books London Killing Hope was first published outside of North America by Zed Books Ltd, 7 Cynthia Street, London NI 9JF, UK in 2003. Second impression, 2004 Printed by Gopsons Papers Limited, Noida, India w w w.zedbooks .demon .co .uk Published in South Africa by Spearhead, a division of New Africa Books, PO Box 23408, Claremont 7735 This is a wholly revised, extended and updated edition of a book originally published under the title The CIA: A Forgotten History (Zed Books, 1986) Copyright © William Blum 2003 The right of William Blum to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. Cover design by Andrew Corbett ISBN 1 84277 368 2 hb ISBN 1 84277 369 0 pb Spearhead ISBN 0 86486 560 0 pb 2 Contents PART I Introduction 6 1. China 1945 to 1960s: Was Mao Tse-tung just paranoid? 20 2. Italy 1947-1948: Free elections, Hollywood style 27 3. Greece 1947 to early 1950s: From cradle of democracy to client state 33 4. The Philippines 1940s and 1950s: America's oldest colony 38 5. Korea 1945-1953: Was it all that it appeared to be? 44 6. Albania 1949-1953: The proper English spy 54 7. Eastern Europe 1948-1956: Operation Splinter Factor 56 8. Germany 1950s: Everything from juvenile delinquency to terrorism 60 9. Iran 1953: Making it safe for the King of Kings 63 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens Without a State: Executive Summary
    Citizens Without A State: Executive Summary By Howard Hills Foreword by former U.S. Attorney General Dick Thornburgh Dedication Jose Celso Barbosa was raised in poverty under Spanish colonial rule, and became the first black student at the Jesuit Seminary. He was Valedictorian at University of Michigan Medical School, and the first U.S. educated medical doctor in Puerto Rico. As a territorial Senator he advocated U.S. citizenship and statehood, was founder of island’s Republican Party. Renowned as a healer, humanitarian, and statesman, Barbosa smashed every barrier. To his courageous vision of a free and democratic Puerto Rico under the American flag this project is dedicated. Foreword: Dick Thornburgh President Reagan said it best in 1980: “As a ‘commonwealth’ Puerto Rico is now neither a state nor independent, and thereby has an historically unnatural status.” As a corollary, Howard Hills articulates the inescapable truism that “the primary democratic rights of national citizenship under the U.S. Constitution can exercised only through State citizenship.” For only citizens of a State admitted to the Union on equal footing with all other States are able to vote in federal elections, and thereby give consent to be governed by our nation’s leaders under the supreme law of the land. To Hills that means one thing: “Something called ‘U.S. citizenship’ without federal voting rights and equal representation in the federal political process is a cruel historical hoax.” *Howard Hills is the author of the book, Citizens Without A State. This is an Executive Summary of the book. *Dick Thornburgh, two-term Governor of Pennsylvania, Attorney General of the United States 1988- 1991, Undersecretary General of the United Nations, K & L Gates, LLP, Pittsburgh 1 Prologue For 119 years U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Common Law Powers of the New York State Attorney General
    THE COMMON LAW POWERS OF THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL Bennett Liebman* The role of the Attorney General in New York State has become increasingly active, shifting from mostly defensive representation of New York to also encompass affirmative litigation on behalf of the state and its citizens. As newly-active state Attorneys General across the country begin to play a larger role in national politics and policymaking, the scope of the powers of the Attorney General in New York State has never been more important. This Article traces the constitutional and historical development of the At- torney General in New York State, arguing that the office retains a signifi- cant body of common law powers, many of which are underutilized. The Article concludes with a discussion of how these powers might influence the actions of the Attorney General in New York State in the future. INTRODUCTION .............................................. 96 I. HISTORY OF THE OFFICE OF THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL ................................ 97 A. The Advent of Affirmative Lawsuits ............. 97 B. Constitutional History of the Office of Attorney General ......................................... 100 C. Statutory History of the Office of Attorney General ......................................... 106 II. COMMON LAW POWERS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL . 117 A. Historic Common Law Powers of the Attorney General ......................................... 117 B. The Tweed Ring and the Attorney General ....... 122 C. Common Law Prosecutorial Powers of the Attorney General ................................ 126 D. Non-Criminal Common Law Powers ............. 136 * Bennett Liebman is a Government Lawyer in Residence at Albany Law School. At Albany Law School, he has served variously as the Executive Director, the Acting Director and the Interim Director of the Government Law Center.
    [Show full text]
  • The Delegation of Federal Power to International Organizations: New Problems with Old Solutions, 85 Minn
    Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship 2000 The elegD ation of Federal Power to International Organizations: New Problems with Old Solutions Julian G. Ku Maurice A. Deane School of Law at Hofstra University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship Recommended Citation Julian G. Ku, The Delegation of Federal Power to International Organizations: New Problems with Old Solutions, 85 Minn. L. Rev. 71 (2000) Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.hofstra.edu/faculty_scholarship/591 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Hofstra Law Faculty Scholarship by an authorized administrator of Scholarly Commons at Hofstra Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The Delegation of Federal Power to International Organizations: New Problems with Old Solutions Julian G. Kut ITihe World Trade Organization exercises a supranational authority in conflict with our forefathers' vision of an America forever sovereign and independent. -Patrick J. Buchanan' [The American people] see the UN aspiring to establish itself as the central authority of a new international order of global laws and global governance. This is an international order the American people will not countenance. 2 -Senator Jesse Helms It is tempting to brush off such concerns about the growing power of international organizations like the World Trade Organization (WTO) and United Nations (UN) as demagogic and paranoid. At the core of their concerns is a conviction that some large measure of power and authority held by the United States government has been impermissibly transferred to remote and unaccountable international organizations in violation of basic constitutional principles or American "sovereignty." Messrs.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modern Concept of Confederation Santorini, 22
    Santorini 22 – 25 September 1994 CDL-STD(1994)011 Or. Engl. Science and technique of democracy No. 11 EUROPEAN COMMISSION FOR DEMOCRACY THROUGH LAW (VENICE COMMISSION) The modern concept of confederation Santorini, 22-25 September 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS Opening session ..................................................Error! Bookmark not defined. Introductory statement by Mr Constantin ECONOMIDES ..................................................... 3 Historical Aspects ...........................................................................................5 Conceptual Aspects .......................................................................................39 a. The classical notions of a confederation and of a federal state - Report by Professor Giorgio MALINVERNI ................................................... 39 b. The modern concept of confederation - Report by Gérald- A. BEAUDOIN .......................................................................................................... 56 c. Towards a new concept of confederation - Report by Professor Murray FORSYTH ..................................................................................... 64 d. A new concept of confederation - Intervention by Mr Maarten Theo JANS ................................................................................................... 76 Examples of present and possible applications ................................................77 a. International and constitutional law aspects of the preliminary agreement concerning the establishment
    [Show full text]