THE AGE OF THE 155 empire In this respect, the age particularly stands as a ' n:'< great landmark. Taken altogether, the abundance and quality of cultural achievement under the Guptas justify the appeUation CHAPTER VI 'Golden age of Indian Siatonj' applied to V. I ■ •> .. Sources The task of the Gupta historian is not.difficult as he THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS is not confronted with the paucity of historical raw materials. He has abundant and hiabl.t reliable materials made available by the aeholarlv labour of indologists both Oriental and Occidental. The (300—600 A.D.) indigenous literary and archaeological materials are happily supplemented and corroborated by the aecounts lett by the foreign ers By a careful analysis of these materials it would be possible to The history of ancient enters upon a new epoch air reconstruct the history of the Guptas in its true perspective. epoch of spectacular achievements in all spheres of life, with' the' "jiidi<'enous literature throws welcome light on the history of foundation fif the Gupta dynasty .in the early part of the 4th century A.D7> <;The Gupta_ period,", writes L. D. Barnett, **is in- theh fJiintas whii Among 'trensmit the literary genuine sources historical mention tradition may be madeOf theof the annals of classical India almost what the periclean age is in eio-hteeii major Purantis. BrahnmniUi, Tayu, Matsya suA Yishmt. the history of Greece.".; To this R. N. Salctore adds : "What the ar°c important for this period. They provide information regarding Elizabethan and Stuaft periods were in the pages of British history,; the extent of the and its provinces. The Puran^ what the era of Augustus was to the Roman empire, what th& were aware of the two kinds of Gupta provinces viz. the directly period of Taitsung was to the liistory of China, what the days of administered provinces through- representatives ot the king and the Louis XIV were to the annals of France, the age of the Guptas Qtatps The Purauic evidence is also important to locate some- may be said to have been to the heritage of India." minor dynasties and their status. Vishnudharmottara. an appendix The Guptas reestablished political unity in the country which to Vishnupurania contains detailed rules regarding image making had been lost to pieces after the decline of the Mauryan dynasty and painting which must have been made use of during this period. This was due to the rise of a strong sense of nationalism. It is true Next in importance is the evidence of the Dharmosasfras and that the Gupta empire was far less in estent when compared tc Arthasastra treatises. The Dharmasastras of Vyasa, Harita Pita- the Mauryas, but they influenced the culture of the country more maha and Pulastya provide peeps into the procedure of law and than the Mauryas. The sound system of administration which they law suits. Pitamaha for the fir.st time refers to eighteen prah-itis and established to maintain their empire ensued an era of peace. It gave gives additional information regarding social life of the period. The tremendous impetus to an outburst of literary and artistic activity only work in the field of Arthasastra is Kamandakiya Nitiswa, an The period witnessed the great development of literature abridgement of the Arthasastra of Kautilya. The Kamandakiya in all its brauohes. In the sphere of secular literature ' throws li^'ht on the Gupta administrative institutions and the charac stands out prominently. His works embody the ideals of patriotism ter of the Gupta government. national unity, goodwill towards all. and high aesthetic sense. In The Eavyas and dramas of the period contain valuable historical the field of scientific literature we have such shining figures as materials. Tlie works of Kalidasa like Meghaduta help us to Aryabhatta, , and Brahmagupta. Sanskrit became the understand the poUtieal geography of India while his R' aglnivamsa U-)igua franca of India. is said to allude to the military exploits of Samiidragupta. An This was an age of great intellectual expansion. This was internal analysis of his works provides positive data to estimate the typified in the University of , a great seat of learning which cultural attainments of the Guptas. attracted students from all parts of the world. with its sectarian creeds like Saivism, Vaisnavism and Tantricism had fully The two works of Visakhadatta, Mudraraksasa and Bevichandra- emertred and was an elaborately developed creed. Tlie gupiam, are other source works of the Gupta epoch. The age lias become memorable 'for the development of temple architec Mudraraksasa deals with the theme that relates more to the iMauryas than to the Guptas. But the description in it of the political strategy ture and from now onwards Brahmanic art comes into its own adopted by Kautilya may have a direct bearing on the Gupta dynasty. soon to become prolific and dominant'. The Dcvichandragiiptam is a political drama which is known only The age was a great period of expansion of Indian culture in through quotations made here and there by certain writers. The the Far Bast which resulted in the establishment of a cultural hero of the play is Kumara Chandragupta, the later Chandragvipta II Yikramaditya. The King, as seen in the play, was Earaagupta, an 154 THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS 157 156 THE AGE OI- THE GUPTAS A writer in Indian Historical Quarterly, Vol. XIV argues on imbecile and weakling. He was defeated by the ruler and the same lines. He says the Gupta inscriptions from the time of agreed to an humiliating treaty, according to which he agreed to and the 'marriage type of coins' suggest that surrender his queen, . Young Chandragupta, who came ^7 succeeded to the dominions of the petty kings, to know of this agreement, disguised himself as Dhruvadevi, entered 7 Gupta and . and became an emperor when he received the camp of the Saka ruler with a small following of his and killed considerable addition to his territory through the marriage with the him. Later he killed his brother, married his widow and became Lichchhavi princess. Chandrasena's rule on the other hand, was only King. The drama introduces the episode of Ramagupta in the Gupta through the usurpation of Sundaravarman's throne. If the Lichchhavis history. luid kept on the throne of , Kalyanavarman would have Another drama that has given rise to much controversy in the had to cross swords with them when he conquered Chandi^asena and Gupta history is Kaumi

164 THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS examines coins No. 6 on plate II of Allan's catalogue, lie will find on THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS 165 the obverse the name Kacha something like Kama. And if the • He had relations with the Vakatakas and his daughter Prabliavati- middle bar is inadvertently omitted as very often happens in gupta was married to the Vakataka King Rudrasena II. After the ^^cripts Kaeha can easily ran into Rama." This view seems to death of Rudrasena the Vakataka polities came directly under the he plausible though not decisive. But his name was Rama and not Gupta influence. Chandragupta II took a personal interest in the Deviehandraguptam and welfare of the Vakataka court and sent his great friend Kalidasa there, who reported back to the emperor on the luxurious life,at;the Recently some copper coins bearing the name Kamagupta have , court. been coUected by Sri Advani and others at Bhilsa. These coins are Thus by the conquest of the Sakas and by entering into presumed to be the issues of Ramagupta, the local ruler of the rei^ion matrimonial alliances with the ruling monarch of the Vakataka country, Chandragupta II raised the prestige of the Gupta empire by thTlar^r^Jer'.'' the humiliating subjugatrn Considerably. Under him the empire extended from the Bay of to the shores of the , besides the whole of Eama^XmtytLfblen a s™on rf'lLZ'pta famUy I'tf Hindustan reaching the farthest limits of the North-west npto the Bhilsa region and not the son and successor of Samudiagupta!" Baflvh. Just as in the days of Samudragupta, Dakshinapatha seems to have continued its allegiance to the Gupta emperor. CHAKDRAGUPTA II VIKEAMADITYA In the reign of Chandragupta II, Fa-hien travelled in North (380-415 A.D.) India, but he never mentions the emperor. He says that the Gupta Chandra^pta II who succeeded to the throne in qsn A n empire was flourishing. Buddhism was in a state of decline and also chosen by his father for his abilitv -mH fnno • S i there was perfect friendship between' the Brahmaiias and the looked upon the empire as a gloried heritage and " Buddhists. Fa-hien mentions many schools of Buddhism. The fully maintained it but also extended it by his own capital of Chandragupta II was the great centre of learning. him started the glorious tradition of Viki-amaditya. Like his father, Chandragupta II issued as many as five types After his accession to the throne, Chandra-'untn TT f-vii of coins. These were, the Archer type, the Couch type, the lAon father's policy of expansion. As has already been notLl T Slayer type, the Clihatm type and the Horseman type. These coins empire under Samudragupta was a confederation of 1 throw considerable light on the personality, imperial pomp and states. The allegiance of these states to th^ iZevi.l power of Chandragupta II. nominal tlian real. Further, the South-west nf Tr.V In conclusion. Chandragupta II, the third emperor of the dynasty, was an enlightened ruler. He was the first sovereign of his dynasty to assume the title of . His reign ushered in un era of artistic effloi-escence whic-li earned the epithet 'the Golden age' for Gupta rule in India. His court is said to have graced by The greatest military achievement of Chandra-^nntfl TT .nr. Navaratna or nine gems. Tliese celebrities included among others, conquest of the Sakas, kuown_ to European scholars as WeZ -n Kalidasa, the greatest poet and dramatist, and Varahamihira, the Satraps who were ruling in Gujrat and Kathiawar neiiin^nln m i • greatest astronomer of the period. , the Buddhist advantage of the internal trouble, he invaded their kiin^dom" " .scholar and saint was attached to his court. In short, as a conqueror powerful army and exterminated tlie Sakas. Later lie f,.a 'I a great general and a statesman Chandragupta II was unquestionably the capital from to Ujjain. "The annexation the paramount sovereign of India. tra and Malva", says V. A. Smith, "not only added to the p provinces of exceptional wealth and fertility, but opened nn^+i'^ ETJMARAGUPTA (415-455 A.D.) paramount power's free access to the Western coast- and tlmc^i I The glorious heritage of the vast and well administered Gunta Chandragupta II in direct touch Avith the seaborne' commevPo vu empire was inherited by Kumaragupta, son and successor of the Europe through Egypt". This conquest of Chaiidracrnntn ""11 , Chandragupta II, peacefuUy. His inscriptions in Benc^al shox^ an end to the last vestiges of the rule of the foreigners in'ind i he retained every ineh of the territory. It is further supported by now Gupta empire came to be extended to the shores of the ArabTan .his description in the Uanju SriMulakalpa as by no ineam 'a we»k ang' but an 'excellent and leading sovereign', the extensTve diawl, sea. tion of the inscri^ptions and the find spots of hL llkT eotrH; The success of Chandragupta II over the Sakas was largelv d celebrated the sacrifice indicativp nf ! to the help that Chandragupta received from the Vakatakas of Berar TM. led T.i. ss- THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS 167

166 THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS Pura.'upta±'uia=,upid. Continuingo they arguePuragupta the Bhitari succeeded SUver Kumaragupta Copper seat I. added more territories to the empire. But: no inscriptions relating The"e iShdaguptraoS nrt appeL on the seal The statenrent to his -wars or conquests have come to light so far; +1 "Rkif«ri Pillar inscription that who when (his) father had If the first part of his reign was peaceful and prosperous, the "ttaattained ned hea^neave n^ , XSsLa (his)drifting enemies fortunes by the strength of his oJfamily (his) : second part began to show signs of deterioration. The peace of the arm, and .. . ^ yjetorv has been won' betook himself like empire was rudely shaken by. the invasion of an enemy, called ^?d then to his weeping mother Pusyamitraa, a tribe unknown to epigraphy, but known to the Purana^. Some have thought that they might have belonged to a branch of the ancient Pusyamitra Sunga :^amily which still retained De™S''Devaki ' rndicates Skandaguptathat 'had rescued no natural his mother claim after to thronekillmg . some amount of independent local sovereignty. Towards tlie close of the reign of Kumaragupta, they thought they had an ojiportunity S^ause he was not the son of Agramahisi (Chief Queen) aiid her to become independent. Unfortunately, their calculations went Miue is not mentioned. These factors show that Skandagupta did wrong and Skandagupta, the Yivvaraja,. dealt with them so severely not succeed to the throne peacefully. that they are no more heard of again in Indian liistory. Though The above views are ably controverted by scliolars who regard Kumaragupta was able to prevail upon the Pusyainitras. the distui"b- Skandagupta as thejimedte successor 'iJ'Tlhftari Sil^r anee left its scars on the economy of the state. Close on the heels of the Pusyamitras, he had to face possibly the fir.st incursions of the Copprs^ uot be viewed seriously because the find pots oi Huns. All these led him to debase the gold coins and issue silver the Ssseals indicateluuiedLc that the authorityBeiiaal. of Puragpota, Bihar and Npasimhagupta the eastern coins. iVfToTuttw Pradesh, whereas Skandagupta was the overlord of Thus when Kumaragupta died the internal conditions of the districts references to enemies in the Bhiiari Gupta empire were by no means sound and settled. This explains the inscriptionan are to internalmentioning enemies of andthe notname to DevakiPusyamitras. might statement that 'Kumaragupta ended (his reign) in disaster' To quote R. N. Dandekar, "Kumaragupta was not much of a heroic warrior like Samudragupta, not an intrepid leader of men like ~teUcoCSt U Biust havefnrth been the sS view "A possible.mother's explanation name. is H^C that Chandragupta II. The credit of having preserved the vast Gupta Koy Chowdhun her'^miserable plight suggested empire intact for a long time, if not of enlarging it. is certainly due \h""ou P ereXSn with Krishna and Devaki. Such a to him. to the "r""" 1, ,, appears tempting, but we must however remem- h" thit in no knowm Gupta inscription tlie name Skandagupia's SKANDAGUPTA (455467 A.D.) motherother has evever r been mentionedstrength and consequently of one simile to inferin the tbat Bhitari her "Of our progenitors whom we ought to have remembered with name was Devaki hazardous. The reason why the court gratitude," writes R. K. Mookerji, "but whom centuries of Musalman oppression, rapine and destruction of records have caused us to poet citedCftrname^f ..pguit of Caki his personal instead fancy of orParvati whim oror whatAditi is moremay forget, the empire of Skandp^pta stands in the foremost rank. When the great Magadhan nation forgot its glorious past, its sacred I R may be because Skandagupta was an avowed Vaishnava, duty of defending the gods and Brahmanas, women and children, f01 he is well known to have been Paramabhafjavata. Tt does not the'weak and helpless and above all the defence of the mother-land| , ninrmfiiral for the court poet to have evoked the name of he alone remembered it, tried his best to maintain the glorious record Sna's mother when he was relating how his emperor, who must of his ancestors from being tarnished and the rich fertile plains of S seemed to him a protector like Krishna was hastening home, to the Indus and from being trampled under the feet of countless lu his anxious mother the glad tidings of lus great yietory over the horses of barbarian Huns, who overturned the mighty empire of the wkPvians It is therefore not sate to conclude that the name of Romans and uprooted the civilizations of Central Europe." This is ^kinda'-upta's mother was Devaki". The noTi-meutioning of the indeed, an eloquent tribute paid to Skandagupta who is in many ^ame of Skandagupta's mother cannot be taken as a positive evidence The Guptas did not follow a inufovm practice in this ways a remarkable personality. respect Sometimes the names of even ordinary queens are mention Scholars are divided on the question of the accession of Skanda ed as in the ease of Kubheranaga, queen of Chandragupta TT and gupta. On the strength of the evidence of the Arya-Manjum Mnla- sometimes, the names of queens, mothers of kings are omitted. kalpa and inscriptions R. K. Mookerji and others came to tlie Moreover, it has to be remembered, it was not as if only the sons of conclusion that the immediate successor of was the Chief Queens could inherit the throne.. The Guptas replaced the Skandagupta. R. C. Majumdar and others disputing this view opine law of primogeniture by the law of ultimogeniture. The cases of +hflt there was a fratricidal war in which Skandagupta came out after defeating the rightful claimant to the throne. 168 THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS 169 Sanmdragupta and Chandragupta point in the samo direction The heroic deeds of Skandagupta suggest that since he -n-as a prince of departure made by the Gupta sovereigns in the rules of succession, proven ability he was selected as Yiivaraja by Kumaragupta I him- which was hereditary, did not work out satisfactorily. This system converted the royal palace into an arena of political intrigues and self and hence there was civil war after the death of Kumaragupta treachery in which princes and the queens freely took part led to appears doubtful. the weakness of the empire. The greatest achievement of Skandagupta was liis encounter The risings of the Pusyamitra during the reign of Kumaragupta with the Hunas. As Yuvaraja lie had dealt with the Pusyamitras I seriously threatened the stability of the Gupta empire considerably. completely and arrested the progress of tlie first incursions of the ,The crown prince, Skandagupta no doubt dealt with them severely Hunas. After his accc.ssion to tlie throne he had to meet another 'and we do not hear of them any more in history. But it clearly formidable Huna invasion under and liis son brought to the surface the vulnerability of the empire. Added to defeated them and united the empire. R. N; Danclekar says "Hio-hest this there was the invasion of the Huns who were knocking at the praise is due to Skandagupta. who was undoubtedly the first hero in doors of India. Skandagupta defeated them also and saved the Asia and Europe to vanquish the Hunas". He was the last great country from their ravages. But there was enormous strain on the hero of the Guptas who realised thai it was his dutv to defend thp royal exchequer and Skandagupta was compelled to debase his gold gates of India at the last drop of his blood. coinage. But the Huns did not give up their designs on India. They In religion, Skandagupta followed the traditional policy of repeated their invasion for a second time and Skandagupta must tolerance and catholicity. Though a Vaishnava. he gave encoura^'e- have lost his life in this encounter. Under weak successors of ment to Jainas and the worshippers. Skandagupta, Toramana and Mihirakula became masters of the Skandagupta was. indeed, one of tlie most illustrious rulers of Punjab and eastern Malva. the Gupta empire. His Junagadli inscription shows that his power Tlie most important cause for the decline of the Gupta empire was intact in that region. His Bull type silver coins prove that he was the assertion of independence by the vassal rulers of the Guptas, was the ma.ster of the Oambay coa.st. "His wise administration his who freed themselves from the imperial yoke and assumed the titles of Maharaja and MaJiarajadhiraja signifying their independent status. Among these powers mention may be made of the Maitrakaa "of Vnllabhi, the Maukharis of Kanauj. the Vakatakas of Berar, assuming the4-1, two.1. ^ titles4.-41 otci'- Ivramaditya' T-. ando— ^'ikramaditva • .iustified in .'Yasodharman of Malva and the rulers of Bengal. The successors of Skandagupta were not strong enou-'h to bear It was during the reign of Buddhagupta that the Maitrakas rose the brunt of the empire. The reign of Puragiipta. suc^cessor of 'to power at Vallabhi, the east of the peninsula of under Skandagupta, was troublesome one. His successor, Buddhagupta •the leadership of Bhattaraka. Dhruvasena, the third king of this according to R. K. Mookerji, 'recovered its position and presti^re dynasty, acknowledged the overlord-ship of the Guptas. They after the dark age following the death of Skandagupta". Tliis view o-vadually assumed an independent position. The rulers of Bengal is disputed. It is probable lie had lost control over the western IMalva Tollowed' the suit and became independent. region, Saurashtra or Oambay. After him the Gupta dynasty'did The rise of the Maukharis of Kanauj in the 6th century A.D. not survive long and declined. further weakened the Gupta power. About 554 A.D. Isanavarman Decline of the Gupta Empire : Causes. It is well and truly Mauldiari drew his sword against his master and assumed imperial said that the rise and fall of the empire alternates like day and title of Maharajadhiraja indicative of his independent status. Later, night. The Gupta empire that was built up by the genius of they allied themselves with the Vardhamanas of Thanesvar in their Saniudragupta and Chandragupta II was heading towards disintegra attempt to dislodge the tyrannical rule of Mihirakula. tion towards the end of the 5tli century A.D. With the death*^ of The establishment of an independent Vakataka empire gave a Skandagupta in 467 A.D. a period of anarchy and misrule set in death blow to the Gupta empire. It is clearly seen that how Chandra the annals of the Guptas. Attempts were no doubt made by gupta's success over the Sakas depended largely on the help he and Buddhagupta to retrieve the fortunes of the received from the Vakataka rulers. "The Vakataka Maharaja" tottering Gupta empire, but the dissensions in the royal family observed V. A. Smith, "occupied a geographical position in which he coupled with the foreign invasions and the ambitions of the subordi could be of much service or disservice to the northern invader of the nate chiefs of the Guptas made their eiforts ineffective. The Gupta dominion of the Saka Satraps of and Surashtra" To secure empire met its inevitable end. the alliance of the Vakatakas Chandragupta II entered into The dissensions in the royal household contributed not a little matrimonial alliance with them. But after the death of Chandra towards the weakness of the empire. As has already been noted, the Gupta, his successor, Kumaragupta I either did not continue his 17V 170 THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS father's policy towards them or they wanted to become independent. important. He does not also make any effort to buttress the king'ff However, during the reign of Narasimhagupta, the Vakatakas \vere- position with analogies of divinity. He has indeed a rational argu advancing in their ambitious campaigns to regain their independence, ment • "A righteous king, protecting his subjects to the best of and they'were crowned with success in the reign of Narendrasena his sources and having the power of capturing hostile cities, should (445-1:65) who triumphantly entered Malva. he held in as high regard as the Lord Prajapati (Brahman) himself. Yasodharman, the viceroy of Mandasor, was on intimate rela It is evident from this the people respected the kma as he was then tions with the Gupta empire which served as a bond of unity to the righteous ruler, efficient administrator and above all the final arbiter ■whole of northern India. He helped his suzerain, Baladitya. m hi& of law'. ■victory over the Hunas. However, his part in this victory seems to The Gupta monarch was not an unbridled one. His authority have turned his head. He openly defied the Gupta power by erecting was circumscribed by the existence of nmairiijaris/mt/. Tbe lansr did two pillars of victory to commemorate the defeat of the foreigners. not attend the parishad meeting. He placed his proposal if This rebellious attitude of Yosadharman weakened Gupta power ■andthe Vision of the Parishad was-final. There was a so the sabha, considerably. an or-an of public opinion. Moreover, tlie kinir was no a law-giver Thus the rise of new independent states meant the partitioning ],e was only an administer of law. This be did without lU the least of the Gupta empire which proved fatal and that was the end of the violating the spirit underlying it. All tl.ese prove that the Govern Gupta empire. ment was constitutional in character. . • ADMINISTRATION The King ' Tlie king was the pivot of the government and an Its character. The government of the Gupta like their important limb in the body politic. He was to man the ship of the predecessors, the Mauryas, was constitutional in character. The state neaeefullv and efRciently. Smiee lie was anxious to earn the assumption of the high sounding titles such as Maharajadhiraja, ^latitude of the people, he bestowed great attention both on the rajadhiraja, paranwrajadhiraja, rajadhirajarahi, and rajarajadhi- SdsL liffand and means property The mostof the important people. Kamandakaduty of the kingsays was: ■•Tie to protect king raja, coupled with that of paramadaivata paraynahhattaraka maha- must furnish protection and. in return, liis subjee s wiU yield rajadkiraja has led some scholars to .surmise that tliese titles taMs" Among his other duties may be mentioned iiitroduetion of emphasise the divine nature of the monarchy. The reference to prompt measures to avert calamities, promotion of in-ts and educa Samudragupta in the Allahabad Pillar Inscription 'as a god dwelling tion and formulation of sound foreign policy. "The Gupta king did on earth, and a mortal only in celebrating tlie rites of the observaneea his duty to the state as a soldier, to the subjects by making thoiU' of mankind' and the description in the later genealogical account as 'equal to the gods Dhanada (Kubera), Varuna. . and Antaka riov the arts of peace, to society by the obserimncc of religions and (yama) "who had no antagonist of equal power in the world" and S conventions and himself and his family by his good behaviour "who wa's the battle-axe of the god Kritanta (yama)'" point in and righteous mode of conduct. Gupta kings placed duties above the .same direction. But the actual working of tlie government rights enjoyed such privileges which came to them as the custo- BU<'gests that the Guptas were not autocrats, nor absolute monarchs diaus of the empire . and thev respected the established laws and customs of the hind. Generally■Fforeditary the ruling succession sovereign was thenoininated prevalent his practice successor of whomthe day. he They were cultured and observed virtuous conduct and self-restraint. rtoimht fit to shoulder the responsibility of the country. He need The kinc^s were venerated and respected by the people because Tint necessarily be the eldest son. Persons of royal birth were sent they considered the institution of kingship as wortliy of respect when the law givers of the period enjoined upon the people to as viceroys of the provinces in the empire. respect the kin'' it was only because of this. Kamandaka says t "The The mantriparishad or the CounoU of Ministers ; The Kamaii- monarchy coUapses with the collapse of the king : while it revives j 7 ■.,„«»! leaves us in no doubt regarding the existence of the with its revival, like the lotus reviving at the rising of the Sun." tSriS This Parishad was merely an advisory body and Continuing be declared, "The king is more necessary than the essential limb in the body pobtic. The posts of: the CounoAl of in for the failure of the rains can be survived, but the absence of mnisters were hereditary, because it was thought that the hereditary the ruler cannot The king is the lawful promoter of all these urinciple may bring with it the tradition of learning and genius. righteous practices, therefore, in the ahsense of a king all right The Mantrimukhya or the Prime Minister presided over the eousness is lost and at the loss of righteousness, this world also meets deliberations of the Council and informed its decision to the th destruction." In his discussion of the sapianga thereby Kaman sovereign. It appears that there was no clear cut division of daka makes it clear that all the elements of, sovereignty are equally military and civil offices. For instance, the composer of Allahabad P-348. pillar Inscription, Harisena, was. himself a Kumaramaiya, Maha- dandanayaka and Sandkivigrahika. It has been argued by soine- 172 THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS THE AGE OF THE GUPTAS 175 scholars that this fact may indicate that either a minister was of arbitration of justice. It conferred two important advantages. (1) transferred from one portfolio to another or that one minister was the experts in law examined the cases and settled the disputes that in charge of more than one department. came up before the courts and (2) it reduced litigation. The duties of the mantriparishad were many. It examined the It is important to note that the tone of the Gupta criminal various aspects of an intricate subject, and arrived at a correct administration was not as rigorous as that of the Mauryas. Kaman decision. Kamandaka says : "A counsel should be again and a^ain daka says : ''The king can no longer hope to control his subjects discussed, before it is finally disposed of ; it should be strTcth- without punishment than a fisherman can hope to catch fish without preserved with scrupulous zeal. A counsel carelessly kept beine a rod. But punishment must be proportionate to the offence if the prematurely divulged, destroys the king even like fire itself' king is to be feared and yet respected". Again, "'Inflicting punish Therefore the king quickly acted on the decisions taken in thp ments heavier than the offences, a king terrifies his subjects, while council. dealing out lighter ones, he is held in contempt by them.. Therefore, Among the important officials of the Central Governmenl a monai'ch should impartially meet out punishments proportionate mention may be made of Baladhikarana or the army offieeT a to the offences." The Guptas gave up tlie use of ordeals. As Fa-hien moral like Aeoka's Dharmamahamairas called VinavasthW observes : "The king in his administration uses no corporal punish sthapaka. The chief of the Police was Dandapasadkikarma The ments; the criminals are merely fined according to the gravity of officer m charge of the military commissariat was called Ranalhan their offences. Even for a second attempt at rebellion, tlie punish There is a reference to the class of Xers ment is only the loss of right hand". The statement brings forth lipankas whose status, designation and functions are not oertai? the mild and benevolent character of the Gupta administration. Aceordmg to some tliey were higher government officials with the In matters of judicial administration Gupta period marks an designation of a minister. K. V. Rano-aswami AK-on,,.,. V Important phase especially in the growth of law. The growth of that he was the president of the coundl of ministers Thev^^al customary law and the formulation of law by interpretation are to ucted as provincial heads. "misters. Ihey also be assigned to this period. 'It is significant to note that the separation Revenne Administration ; Sound finance was the basis of the of judiciary ITom executive which is being tried today was already successful government. Treasury was, indeed the h^-rnr^ ^ ^ in vogue during the Gupta period'. administration and cultural development and'hence its Tn ^ ■ Military Organization ; The Guptas maintained a well equip among the seven elements of sovereignty. The Gupta ped and strong army. Tlic existence of separate war cabinet suggests ^t give much information regarding the administration of revenue that the Guptas were keen on the maintenance of efficiency in the The primary source of the revenue to the central exchcnnp^ « n ^ army organization. They also possessed a fleet. The war office looked was the land tax. The land tax was not uniform due to thp pvI f I after the limbs of the army in addition to tlie commissariat and different kinds of lands. We l^ow only of t™ tect kiSfoT^d admiralty. The Gupta records refer to a number of army officers. t^es, VIZ, bhaga a tax paid by the private land owner, and The Mahabaladhikrita wa.s the commander-in-ehiei' of the army; bhoga a ax paid on erown lands. Merchants, artisans, traders and Mahahaladhyaksa, the superintendent of the army, supervised and wealthy classes paid taxes. To these sources may be added incZ controlled the armed forces; Mahasarva-dandanayaka. the supreme from mint, booty from war and tribute paid by the feudatories ThT commander and controller of Sart^adhyaksas; Mahadn^idanayaka, was a department to collect the taxes regularly. The fact that ^ officer-in-charge of laud transactions; Mahascvdhi Vigrahika, the Gupta empire lasted for over two centuries suggests that the treasii^! chief officer for peace and war; Sandhivigrahika, an officer who took was swelling and this imparted stability to the fabric of the Gup^ part during the war period, and Baladhikarana, an army officer. The different limbs of the army had their own chiefs. Thus pulapati was Judicial Administration : Administration of iustice tii the commandant of the elephant corps; hatapati was in charge of most important duty of the king. The Gupta kin<^ were elephants; and asvapati was ineharge of . Probably the use of this vital function of theirs and administered the law withr! I of the chariots was on the decline. Ranahhandaraka was in char^^e -the least violating the spirit underlying it. There were a of war finances. The entire military establishment was his respons tion of courts from the chief court to the local courts A ® f " ibility. demarcation was made between the civil and criminal cnny-fc ^ Provincial Gkivemment : chief court was the Sabha presided over by PradviTZ \