DOCSLIB.ORG

The City Record. Supplement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The City Record. Supplement THE CITY RECORD. SUPPLEMENT. VoL. XXXII. ASSESSED VALUATION OF REAL ESTATE, 1904. _A_ COP-Y" OF TH E Annual Record of Assessed Valuation of Real Estate IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK, 1904. Published in Compliance with the Provisions of Chapter 454 of the Laws of 1903. BOROUCH OF QUEENS. THIRD WARD, Formerly the Town of Flushing. ' Attu r.it r r .011.er 1-. .......-..1.4.1 ii,.11,--- .__.4 JU !i t, mcitt :1 t- Lillrg 4 U P PLEM ENT. THE CITY RECORD. Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 1, Map 1, Page 1. Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 9, Map 1, Page 6. Between East River and G Avenue; Between West Boulevard and Tenth Street. Between Third Avenue and Flushing Bay; Between First and Third Streets. Value Value w Value of Estate Value Ward, of Real Real of Real Real Lstate Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property., with Im- Ward, Lot Estate, Owner or Occupant. r-Description of Property., Lot with Im- Stories Street or Map Unim- provements Estate, Stories Street or Map Unim- provements Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. A. D. Schlessinger 2.66 A. C. $500 $500 N. W. C. James D. Murphy 336.75xIrreg. SOO 500 • • 9 G. Schwicker Sox Irreg. 2 1 $800 $1,800 Unknown 132.5oxIrreg. 22 300 300 Patrick Meagher 25x Irreg. 2 400 1,200 N. W. C. 3 Mrs. John Sanderson Irreg. 2 1,200 2,500 Mary A. Chisolm 1i.3 A. C. 39,000 45,000 75x 4 3 50 Mary Kramer Estate SOX Irreg. 2 7 800 2,000 Mark Larkin 501 Irreg. 1% 9 800 1,200 Geo. Emmerich I OOX Irreg. 2 II 1,600 3,600 Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 2, Map r, Page 2. Magdalena Seefert 50x1 00 2 15 800 M. Mandeville 25X100 2 400 1,092009 Between and G Avenue; Between Boulevard and Tenth Street. N. W. C. G. Schweicker 25X100 2 18 350 1,200 19 1,200 Value of Am. Hard Rubber Co I25X100 Value 32 TOO Ward, of Real Real Estate Am. Hard Rubber Co 75x M. McGrath too Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property:, Lot Estate, with Im- SOX 35 Stories Street or Map Unim- provements American Hard Rubber Co 2001450 55 1,000 1,00: Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. so, Map 1, Page 6. A. D. Schlessinger 2251.67xIrreg. 2 I 83,V5 $8,000 James D. Murphy 8.55 A. C. 3 to 12,825 I 6,000 N. E. C. Between Second and Third Avenues; Between First and Third Streets. Rolph Brown 3.25 A. C. 24 7,000 7,000 Mary A. Chisolm 5.85 A. C. 2/2 34 14,000 15,000 Value Value of Jno. Freylingsdorf 141 xlrreg. 2 go • 2,000 4,500 Ward, of Real Real Estate Unknown 2c1.8ox239.56 95 200 200 Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property.-Th Lot Estate, with Im- Stories Street or Map Unim- provements Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 3, Map I, Page 2. Between and First Avenue; Between Eighth and l'enth Streets. S. E. C. T. 31. Donnelly.... ....... 75x 100 2 $1,200 $2,500 11Iary N. Banks... 50X200 2 4 1,500 3,000 Value Value of Golsner Bros 75x too . 6 1,200 1,200 Ward, of Real Real Estate Emma Krummer zoom oo 2 1,600 2,500 Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property.-, Lot Estate, with Im- N. VV. C. Stories Street or Map lJnirn- provements Adam Partenfelder 1501(200 13 4,500 7,500 Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Christian C. M. Ran soxioo 2 25 700 2,000 Colsner Bros r25xiclo 2 1,700 3,000 N. R. C. N. E. C. Phill Bottman 75x100 34 1,200 3,000 Louisa Weithing 200 X125 $3,500 $8000 F. G. Panly 100 X245 2/2 9 1,600 5,000 L. Bardenhauer 100 X245 2 y 13 x,600 5,000 Elizabeth Manling 100 X245 2.4 17 1,600 5,000 Ward 3, Volume I, Block No. II, Map 1, Page 6. Emil Greift 186.6x Irreg. 154 21 5,000 5,500 Elizabeth Moeling 100 X200 50 2,000 2,000 Between First and Second Avenues; Between Second and Third Streets. Bernard Greift 100 1200 2/2. 54 2,000 6,500 2,000 F. G. Panty 100 1200 58 2,000 Value Value of First Reform Church Par- Ward, of Real Real Estate sonage 75 X200 2 %2 62 1,500 2,000 N. W. C. Owner or Occupant. ,--Description of Property., Lot Estate, with Im- Stories Street or Map Unim- provemerfts First Reform Church X125 65 Exempt. 75 High. No. No. proved. Thereon. First Reform Church so X125 69 Igg Exempt. Size of Lot. Louisa Schmidt 3o X125 71 00 500 Tos. Witzel 45 XI 25 72 00 2,700 N. E. C. Felix Karsch 123 X200 2,4 74 6,5oo Ernie' Riesenburger 75x100 3 $2,0 00 $7,000 S. VI. C. A. Uhlendahl 1252100 2 4 2,500 7,000 Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 4, Map 1, Page 3. NIalevine Schleicher 50%100 9 1,000 1,000 J. Schurmann 501100 2 1,000 3,000 Between and First Avenue; Between Seventh and Eighth Streets. Malevine Schleicher 5031100 1,000 1,000 N. ;Ir. C. C. S. Pappenhuesen I 00X100 2,500 2,500 Value Value of NI C. Ward, of Real Real Estate Stoiter Estate 100X1 25 24 2,500 2,500 Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property., Lot Estate, with Im- alevine Schleicher 1251100 rs 2,000 2,000 Stories Street or Map Unim- provements Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Ward 3. .Volume 1, Block No. 12, Map 1. Page 6. N. E. C. Max Zehden 2001350 2 $6,200 $7,000 Between First and Second Avenues; Between Second and Third Streets. A. D. Schlessinger 2003E332.6 14 5,200 5,200 Value Value of Ward, of Real Real Estate Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 5, Map 1, Page 3. Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property., Lot Estate, with Im- Between and First Avenue; Between Sixth and Seventh Streets. Stories Street or Map provements Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Value Value of S. E. C. Ward, of Real Real Estate $2,000 $2,000 Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Lot Estate, with Im- Chas. H. Aery tooxioo Property.- 1,500 1,500 Stories Street or Map Unim- provements J. M. Donnelly 75it100 Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. S.W. C. Joseph M. Donnelly 2 SX 1 00 7 500 500 Fred Rolle 50X100 2 8 800 2,200 J. M. Donnelly 201685.10 4 I $15,000 $20,000 Arthur Grell 100X100 a 10 I ,600 4,200 N. W. C. Mrs. John Sanderson isoxioo 2 14 2,400 5,500 N. E. C. Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 6, Map r, Page 3. Mary A. Packayd 501100 2% 20 900 2,500 Everett H. Lewis 25%100 2 22 450 ,Soo C. A. Poppenheusen 100X100 23 1,400 I,600 Value Value of 251100 27 450 450 Ward, of Real Real Estate H. F. Joekers Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property., Lot Estate, with Im- Stories Street or Map Unim- provements Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Ward 3, Volume t, Block No. 13, Map I. Page 6. Between First and Second Avenues; Between Third and Fourth Streets. J. M. Donnelly 225.701680 Irreg. $8,000 $8,000 Value Value of Ward, of Real Real Estate Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 7, Map r, Page 4. Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Pro etorpirs Lot Estate, with Im- Street or Map Unim- provements Between First Avenue and East River; Between East River and Fifth Street . Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. Value Value of Ivan Von Auw 125x200 2 1 $4,500 $7,500 Ward, of Real Real Estatc 225%200 2.4 10 7,200 Exempt. Owner or Occupant. ,-Description of Property.-, Lot Estate, with Im- Bethlehem Orphan Asylum Stories Street or Map Unim- provements Size of Lot. High. No. No. Thereon. proved. Ward 3, Volume 1, Block No. 14, Map r, Page 6. N. Y. & College Point Between First a,nd Second Avenues; Between Fourth and Fifth Streets. Ferry Co 285.5ox Irreg. I $10,000 $13,000 Max Zehden 250 X Irreg. 2 14 10,00o 14,000 Max Zehden 50 1204 24 3,000 Value Value of 4,000 Estate Stoiber Estate 450 X200 100 12,000 12,000 Ward, of Real Real Rodman Sands 200 X Irreg. 136 4,000 4,000 ,-Description of Property., Lot Estate, with Im- Owner or Occupant. Unim- provements Knickerbocker Yacht Club 200 X200 2 1 46 4,500 7,000 Stories Street or Map Knickerbocker Yacht Club 175 x Irreg. 500 500 Size of Lot. High. No. No. proved. Thereon. N. r. C. Aug. A. Low 125 1200 200 4,000 4,000 S. E. C. Aug. A. F. Schneider 75 1200 2 2,500 5,000 $2,000 $2,000 Stoiber Estate 10 OX 1 0 0 N.E.C. S. W. C. 200 X200 236 Aug. A. Low 4,500 6,000 2 5 2,400 3.800 Unknown Irreg. 300 too zoo Ernest Eoeller 100XI50 50X100 2 II 800 2,000 T.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3 Flushing Meadows Corona Park Strategic Framework Plan
    Possible reconfiguration of the Meadow Lake edge with new topographic variation Flushing Meadows Corona Park Strategic Framework Plan 36 Quennell Rothschild & Partners | Smith-Miller + Hawkinson Architects Vision & Goals The river and the lakes organize the space of the Park. Our view of the Park as an ecology of activity calls for a large-scale reorganization of program. As the first phase in the installation of corridors of activity we propose to daylight the Flushing River and to reconfigure the lakes to create a continuous ribbon of water back to Flushing Bay. RECONFIGURE & RESTORE THE LAKES Flushing Meadows Corona Park is defined by water. Today, the Park meets Flushing Bay at its extreme northern channel without significantly impacting the ecological characteristics of Willow and Meadow Lakes and their end. At its southern end, the Park is dominated by the two large lakes, Willow Lake and Meadow Lake, created for shorelines. In fact, additional dredged material would be valuable resource for the reconfiguration of the lakes’ the 1939 World’s Fair. shoreline. This proposal would, of course, require construction of a larger bridge at Jewel Avenue and a redesign of the Park road system. The hydrology of FMCP was shaped by humans. The site prior to human interference was a tidal wetland. Between 1906 and 1934, the site was filled with ash and garbage. Historic maps prior to the ‘39 Fair show the Flushing To realize the lakes’ ecological value and their potential as a recreation resource with more usable shoreline and Creek meandering along widely varying routes through what later became the Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Tibor T. Polgar Fellowships
    Past Tibor T. Polgar Fellowships The Hudson River estuary stretches from its tidal limit at the Federal Dam at Troy, New York, to its merger with the New York Bight, south of New York City. Within that reach, the estuary displays a broad transition from tidal freshwater to marine conditions that are reflected in its physical composition and the biota it supports. These characteristics present a major opportunity and challenge for researchers to describe the makeup and workings of a complex and dynamic ecosystem. The Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program provides funds for graduate and undergraduate students to study selected aspects of the physical, chemical, biological, and public policy realms of the estuary. Since its inception in 1985, the program has provided approximately $1 million in funding to 189 students and can boast the involvement of 116 advisors from 64 institutions. The program is named in memory of Dr. Tibor T. Polgar, an estuarine biologist who was a key advisor to the Hudson River Foundation for Science and Environmental Research when the fellowship program was created. The program is conducted jointly by the Hudson River Foundation and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. The fellowships are funded by the Foundation. Past reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship program are listed below. Download the entire report or particular sections as PDF files. Final Reports of the Tibor T. Polgar Fellowship Program, 2019 - Sarah Fernald, David Yozzo, and Helena Andreyko, editors I. Use of Gadolinium to Track Sewage Effluent Through the Poughkeepsie, New York Water System – Matthew Badia, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • July 8 Grants Press Release
    CITY PARKS FOUNDATION ANNOUNCES 109 GRANTS THROUGH NYC GREEN RELIEF & RECOVERY FUND AND GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC GRANT APPLICATION NOW OPEN FOR PARK VOLUNTEER GROUPS Funding Awarded For Maintenance and Stewardship of Parks by Nonprofit Organizations and For Free Live Performances in Parks, Plazas, and Gardens Across NYC July 8, 2021 - NEW YORK, NY - City Parks Foundation announced today the selection of 109 grants through two competitive funding opportunities - the NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund and GREEN / ARTS LIVE NYC. More than ever before, New Yorkers have come to rely on parks and open spaces, the most fundamentally democratic and accessible of public resources. Parks are critical to our city’s recovery and reopening – offering fresh air, recreation, and creativity - and a crucial part of New York’s equitable economic recovery and environmental resilience. These grant programs will help to support artists in hosting free, public performances and programs in parks, plazas, and gardens across NYC, along with the nonprofit organizations that help maintain many of our city’s open spaces. Both grant programs are administered by City Parks Foundation. The NYC Green Relief & Recovery Fund will award nearly $2M via 64 grants to NYC-based small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. Grants will help to support basic maintenance and operations within heavily-used parks and open spaces during a busy summer and fall with the city’s reopening. Notable projects supported by this fund include the Harlem Youth Gardener Program founded during summer 2020 through a collaboration between Friends of Morningside Park Inc., Friends of St. Nicholas Park, Marcus Garvey Park Alliance, & Jackie Robinson Park Conservancy to engage neighborhood youth ages 14-19 in paid horticulture along with the Bronx River Alliance’s EELS Youth Internship Program and Volunteer Program to invite thousands of Bronxites to participate in stewardship of the parks lining the river banks.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Comprehensive Waterfront Plan
    NEW YORK CITY CoMPREHENSWE WATERFRONT PLAN Reclaiming the City's Edge For Public Discussion Summer 1992 DAVID N. DINKINS, Mayor City of New lVrk RICHARD L. SCHAFFER, Director Department of City Planning NYC DCP 92-27 NEW YORK CITY COMPREHENSIVE WATERFRONT PLAN CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMA RY 1 INTRODUCTION: SETTING THE COURSE 1 2 PLANNING FRA MEWORK 5 HISTORICAL CONTEXT 5 LEGAL CONTEXT 7 REGULATORY CONTEXT 10 3 THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 17 WATERFRONT RESOURCES AND THEIR SIGNIFICANCE 17 Wetlands 18 Significant Coastal Habitats 21 Beaches and Coastal Erosion Areas 22 Water Quality 26 THE PLAN FOR THE NATURAL WATERFRONT 33 Citywide Strategy 33 Special Natural Waterfront Areas 35 4 THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 51 THE EXISTING PUBLIC WATERFRONT 52 THE ACCESSIBLE WATERFRONT: ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES 63 THE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC WATERFRONT 70 Regulatory Strategy 70 Public Access Opportunities 71 5 THE WORKING WATERFRONT 83 HISTORY 83 THE WORKING WATERFRONT TODAY 85 WORKING WATERFRONT ISSUES 101 THE PLAN FOR THE WORKING WATERFRONT 106 Designation Significant Maritime and Industrial Areas 107 JFK and LaGuardia Airport Areas 114 Citywide Strategy fo r the Wo rking Waterfront 115 6 THE REDEVELOPING WATER FRONT 119 THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT TODAY 119 THE IMPORTANCE OF REDEVELOPMENT 122 WATERFRONT DEVELOPMENT ISSUES 125 REDEVELOPMENT CRITERIA 127 THE PLAN FOR THE REDEVELOPING WATERFRONT 128 7 WATER FRONT ZONING PROPOSAL 145 WATERFRONT AREA 146 ZONING LOTS 147 CALCULATING FLOOR AREA ON WATERFRONTAGE loTS 148 DEFINITION OF WATER DEPENDENT & WATERFRONT ENHANCING USES
    [Show full text]
  • In New York City
    Outdoors Outdoors THE FREE NEWSPAPER OF OUTDOOR ADVENTURE JULY / AUGUST / SEPTEMBER 2009 iinn NNewew YYorkork CCityity Includes CALENDAR OF URBAN PARK RANGER FREE PROGRAMS © 2009 Chinyera Johnson | Illustration 2 CITY OF NEW YORK PARKS & RECREATION www.nyc.gov/parks/rangers URBAN PARK RANGERS Message from: Don Riepe, Jamaica Bay Guardian To counteract this problem, the American Littoral Society in partnership with NYC Department of Parks & Recreation, National Park Service, NYC Department of Environmental Protection, NY State Department of Environmental Conservation, Jamaica Bay EcoWatchers, NYC Audubon Society, NYC Sierra Club and many other groups are working on various projects designed to remove debris and help restore the bay. This spring, we’ve organized a restoration cleanup and marsh planting at Plum Beach, a section of Gateway National Recreation Area and a major spawning beach for the ancient horseshoe crab. In May and June during the high tides, the crabs come ashore to lay their eggs as they’ve done for millions of years. This provides a critical food source for the many species of shorebirds that are migrating through New York City. Small fi sh such as mummichogs and killifi sh join in the feast as well. JAMAICA BAY RESTORATION PROJECTS: Since 1986, the Littoral Society has been organizing annual PROTECTING OUR MARINE LIFE shoreline cleanups to document debris and create a greater public awareness of the issue. This September, we’ll conduct Home to many species of fi sh & wildlife, Jamaica Bay has been many cleanups around the bay as part of the annual International degraded over the past 100 years through dredging and fi lling, Coastal Cleanup.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download Three Wonder Walks
    Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) Featuring Walking Routes, Collections and Notes by Matthew Jensen Three Wonder Walks (After the High Line) The High Line has proven that you can create a des- tination around the act of walking. The park provides a museum-like setting where plants and flowers are intensely celebrated. Walking on the High Line is part of a memorable adventure for so many visitors to New York City. It is not, however, a place where you can wander: you can go forward and back, enter and exit, sit and stand (off to the side). Almost everything within view is carefully planned and immaculately cultivated. The only exception to that rule is in the Western Rail Yards section, or “W.R.Y.” for short, where two stretch- es of “original” green remain steadfast holdouts. It is here—along rusty tracks running over rotting wooden railroad ties, braced by white marble riprap—where a persistent growth of naturally occurring flora can be found. Wild cherry, various types of apple, tiny junipers, bittersweet, Queen Anne’s lace, goldenrod, mullein, Indian hemp, and dozens of wildflowers, grasses, and mosses have all made a home for them- selves. I believe they have squatters’ rights and should be allowed to stay. Their persistence created a green corridor out of an abandoned railway in the first place. I find the terrain intensely familiar and repre- sentative of the kinds of landscapes that can be found when wandering down footpaths that start where streets and sidewalks end. This guide presents three similarly wild landscapes at the beautiful fringes of New York City: places with big skies, ocean views, abun- dant nature, many footpaths, and colorful histories.
    [Show full text]
  • Tomorrow's World
    Tomorrow’s World: The New York World’s Fairs and Flushing Meadows Corona Park The Arsenal Gallery June 26 – August 27, 2014 the “Versailles of America.” Within one year Tomorrow’s World: 10,000 trees were planted, the Grand Central Parkway connection to the Triborough Bridge The New York was completed and the Bronx-Whitestone Bridge well underway.Michael Rapuano’s World’s Fairs and landscape design created radiating pathways to the north influenced by St. Peter’s piazza in the Flushing Meadows Vatican, and also included naturalized areas Corona Park and recreational fields to the south and west. The Arsenal Gallery The fair was divided into seven great zones from Amusement to Transportation, and 60 countries June 26 – August 27, 2014 and 33 states or territories paraded their wares. Though the Fair planners aimed at high culture, Organized by Jonathan Kuhn and Jennifer Lantzas they left plenty of room for honky-tonk delights, noting that “A is for amusement; and in the interests of many of the millions of Fair visitors, This year marks the 50th and 75th anniversaries amusement comes first.” of the New York World’s Fairs of 1939-40 and 1964-65, cultural milestones that celebrated our If the New York World’s Fair of 1939-40 belonged civilization’s advancement, and whose visions of to New Dealers, then the Fair in 1964-65 was for the future are now remembered with nostalgia. the baby boomers. Five months before the Fair The Fairs were also a mechanism for transform- opened, President Kennedy, who had said, “I ing a vast industrial dump atop a wetland into hope to be with you at the ribbon cutting,” was the city’s fourth largest urban park.
    [Show full text]
  • LISS 3.3.Qxd
    RestoringRestoring LongLong CONNECTICUT Connecticut Quinnipiac River River IslandIsland Thames Sound’s River Sound’s Housatonic River Stonington HabitatsHabitats Old Saybrook COMPLETED RESTORATION SITES IN PROGRESS RESTORATION SITES POTENTIAL RESTORATION SITES PROJECT BOUNDARY RIVER LONG ISLAND SOUND Greenwich 2002 RESTORATION SITES Southold BLUE INDICATES COMPLETED SITE – CONSTRUCTION ON THE PROJECT IS FINISHED, BUT MONITORING MAY BE ON-GOING GREEN INDICATES IN PROGRESS SITE– SOME PHASE OF THE PROJECT IS UNDERWAY, E.G. APPLYING FOR FUNDING, DESIGN, OR CONSTRUCTION BLACK INDICATES POTENTIAL SITE – A RESTORATION PROJECT HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED, NO ACTION TAKEN YET MOUNT VERNON RYE BOLDFACE IN ALL COLORS INDICATES HIGH-RANKED SITES Rye Glover Field (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook (FW) Beaver Swamp Brook/Cowperwood site (FW) Brookhaven NEW ROCHELLE Blind Brook (FW) Echo Bay (TW/SR/IF/RI) Edith G. Read Wildlife Sanctuary (TW/F/EE/FW) CONNECTICUT Former Dickerman’s Pond (FW) Marshlands Conservancy (TW/F/IF) Farm River (TW) EW ORK Nature Study Woods (F/FW) Farm River tributary/Edgemere Rd. (TW) N Y Pryer Manor Marsh (TW) SMITHTOWN BRANFORD Morris Creek/Sibley Lane (TW) Callahan’s Beach (CB) Branford River STP (TW) New Haven Airport (TW) Bronx BRONX NORTH HEMPSTEAD Fresh Pond (FW/F/BD) Branford R./Christopher Rd. (TW) Nissequogue Bronx Oyster Reefs (SR) Baxter Estates Pond (FW) Harrison Pond Town Park (FW/RMC/TW/F) Branford R./St. Agnes Cemetery (TW) EAST LYME NEW YORK Bronx River mouth (TW/F/RMC) Hempstead Harbor (EE/IF/TW) Landing Avenue Town Park (TW) Branford R./Hickory Rd. (TW) Brides Brook Culvert (RMC/TW) River Bronx River Trailway (TW/FW/F/RMC) Lake Success (FW) Long Beach (BD) Branford R.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape Architecture | Urban Design Two Locations, One Diverse Practice
    ARCHITECTURE | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE | URBAN DESIGN TWO LOCATIONS, ONE DIVERSE PRACTICE NEW YORK SAN JUAN FLUSHING BAY PROMENADE STAKEHOLDER MEETING March 4, 2021 2 PARKS STREETSCAPES WATERFRONTS MASTER PLANS FLUSHING BAY PROMENADE STAKEHOLDER MEETING March 4, 2021 3 DESIGNING THE WATERFRONT Mill Pond Park Orchard Beach Pavilion Bronx Point Bronx Bank Street College of Education Food Bank for NYC LEGEND Marvel Projects Flushing Bay Promenade Lincoln Harbor Manhattan Louis Armstrong House Museum Flushing Bay Promenade New Jersey Hoboken Boathouse Roosevelt Island Olmsted Center Main Street Unisphere Fountain Restoration Roosevelt Parc Greenpoint Development Liberty Harbor MTA Flood Mitigation Queens Battery Park Streetscape Elevated Acre Streetscapes Pier A Plaza Battery Maritime Building Naval Cemetery St. Ann’s Warehouse Brooklyn Navy Yard Berry Lane Park Pierhouse - 1 Hotel Governor’s Island Brooklyn Greenway BFC Affordable Housing Snug Harbor Brooklyn Staten Island FLUSHING BAY PROMENADE STAKEHOLDER MEETING March 4, 2021 4 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT FLUSHING BAY PROMENADE STAKEHOLDER MEETING March 4, 2021 5 ENGAGEMENT STRATEGY Group 1 Group 2 Group 3 Individual Interviews Stakeholder Meetings Public Workshops Staff/Stakeholders Community Boards/Identified Groups Community One-on-one calls or zoom meetings Identify existing locations where people Large Group Zoom Meetings Individual interviews and surveys in parks already visit, food banks, pharmacies Surveymonkey.com Mentimeter.com Facebook Surveys FLUSHING BAY PROMENADE STAKEHOLDER MEETING
    [Show full text]
  • Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide
    TABLE OF CONTENTS The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway Guide INTRODUCTION . .2 1 CONEY ISLAND . .3 2 OCEAN PARKWAY . .11 3 PROSPECT PARK . .16 4 EASTERN PARKWAY . .22 5 HIGHLAND PARK/RIDGEWOOD RESERVOIR . .29 6 FOREST PARK . .36 7 FLUSHING MEADOWS CORONA PARK . .42 8 KISSENA-CUNNINGHAM CORRIDOR . .54 9 ALLEY POND PARK TO FORT TOTTEN . .61 CONCLUSION . .70 GREENWAY SIGNAGE . .71 BIKE SHOPS . .73 2 The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway System ntroduction New York City Department of Parks & Recreation (Parks) works closely with The Brooklyn-Queens the Departments of Transportation Greenway (BQG) is a 40- and City Planning on the planning mile, continuous pedestrian and implementation of the City’s and cyclist route from Greenway Network. Parks has juris- Coney Island in Brooklyn to diction and maintains over 100 miles Fort Totten, on the Long of greenways for commuting and Island Sound, in Queens. recreational use, and continues to I plan, design, and construct additional The Brooklyn-Queens Greenway pro- greenway segments in each borough, vides an active and engaging way of utilizing City capital funds and a exploring these two lively and diverse number of federal transportation boroughs. The BQG presents the grants. cyclist or pedestrian with a wide range of amenities, cultural offerings, In 1987, the Neighborhood Open and urban experiences—linking 13 Space Coalition spearheaded the parks, two botanical gardens, the New concept of the Brooklyn-Queens York Aquarium, the Brooklyn Greenway, building on the work of Museum, the New York Hall of Frederick Law Olmsted, Calvert Vaux, Science, two environmental education and Robert Moses in their creations of centers, four lakes, and numerous the great parkways and parks of ethnic and historic neighborhoods.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Gradients and Trends in New York Harbor ∗ Dylan M
    Regional Studies in Marine Science 33 (2020) 100922 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Regional Studies in Marine Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/rsma Water quality gradients and trends in New York Harbor ∗ Dylan M. Taillie , Judith M. O'Neil, William C. Dennison University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, Integration and Application Network and Horn Point Environmental Lab, Cambridge, MD 21613, United States of America article info a b s t r a c t Article history: New York Harbor is a complex of interconnected waterways that have supported the rapid develop- Received 7 June 2019 ment of a thriving megacity and metropolitan region. The water quality of New York, a partner city in Received in revised form 29 October 2019 the World Harbour Project, is a reflection of the combined impacts of this metropolitan region. Water Accepted 30 October 2019 quality health and trends were assessed between 1996–2017 in 9 different reporting regions using Available online 7 November 2019 publicly available data. Analyses of New York Harbor water quality reveal strong persistent geographic gradients and long-term trends in improving water quality. Data was synthesized for five indicators throughout the New York harbor region including: total nitrogen (TN), total phosphorus (TP), dissolved oxygen (DO), chlorophyll a (chla), and water clarity (secchi disk depth). The health of the waterways surrounding New York City was evaluated and graded on a 0%–100% scale and displayed using a 'stoplight color scheme'. The best water quality in the region evaluated was in the area of the most exchange with the Atlantic Ocean in the Lower Bay near the harbor entrance.
    [Show full text]
  • Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan
    Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Queens East River and North Shore Greenway Master Plan New York City Department of City Planning New York City Department of Parks & Recreation 2006 2006 • NYC Department of Parks & Recreation Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Project PIN X500.97 The preparation of this report was fi nanced in part through funds from the U.S.Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The contents of this report refl ect the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented within. The contents do not necessarily refl ect the offi cial views or policies of the Federal Highway Administration. This report does not constitute a standard, specifi cation, or regulation. NYC Department of City Planning • 2006 Queens East River & North Shore Greenway Master Plan Table of Contents Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................1 Project Description ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 Study Area
    [Show full text]