DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix C Wildlife

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

APPENDIX C WILDLIFE Wildlife Species of Cheyenne Mountain State Park Compiled by Colorado State Parks, 2001 Codes *Imperiled species are those with Partners in Flight (PIF) Tot=>21 or Covers =>38; or Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP)=< S3 (PT= Population Trend- Birds with high scores for PT are more demonstrably in need on conservation action than are birds with low scores; AI= Area Importance- =>3 indicates greater conservation value.) **Federal or CO Status: E= federally endangered; T= federally threatened; PT= Proposed Threatened; C= Candidate; DM= Delisted Taxon, Recovered, Monitored first five years; SE= State endangered; ST= State threatened; SC= State species of concern; FS= Sensitive (identified by the regional forester); BLM= Sensitive (found on public lands, similar to C). **CNHP Status: G= Global; S= State; B= Breeding Status; 1= critically imperiled because of extreme rarity; 5= demonstrably secure; N= Non-breeding status; SH= historically known but not verified for an extended period of time; SZ= migrant, occurrences too irregular, dispersed or transitory; T= trinomial rank used for subspecies **Source codes: AF= Peterson Air Force Base; CH= Cheyenne Mountain State Park; FC= Fort Carson Army Base; FL= Florrissant National Monument; DM= Distribution Maps for El Paso County; EP= El Paso County Species Lists; N= NORAD Air Force Facility **Likelihood to be Present codes: 1= Animal or animal sign observed onsite; 2= Suitable habitat present and animal is very likely; 3= Some suitable habitat present and animal could be present; 4=Limited suitable habitat- animal not likely, but if present may use area for food (potentially important food source); 5= Migrant- may fly over or pass through area, but does not stay. C-1 Wildlife Species of Cheyenne Mountain State Park Compiled by Colorado State Parks, 2001 Likelihood PIF COVERS Agency to be Scores Scores Sensitive Federal Colorado CNHP Common Name Scientific Name Source Present Tot/PT/AI Total Biology Status Status Status Ranking Mammalia Marsupalia Oppossum Didelphis marsupialis AF 2 16 Insectivora Least Shrew Cryptotis parva AF 2 or 3 24 Masked Shrew Sorex cinereus AF 4 34 Merriam's Shrew Sorex merriami AF 3 33 Northern Short-tailed Shrew Blarina brevicauda AF * * Montane Shrew Sorex monticolus N 3 30 Chiroptera Plecotus townsendii Townsend's Big-eared Bat pallescens CH 2 68 BLM G4T4/S2 Myotis thysanodes Fringed-tail Bat pahasapensis N 2 57 S3 Lagomorpha Black-tailed Jack Rabbit Lepus californicus AF 2 24 Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus AF,CH 1 4 Rodentia Spermophilus 13-lined Groundsquirrel tridecemlineatus AF 2 16 G5T3/S3 Spermophilus Spotted Groundsquirrel spilosoma AF 2 or 3 18 G5T4/S1 C-2 Likelihood PIF COVERS Agency to be Scores Scores Sensitive Federal Colorado CNHP Common Name Scientific Name Source Present Tot/PT/AI Total Biology Status Status Status Ranking Abert's Squirrel Sciurus aberti N 4 28 Tamiasciurus Red Squirrel hudsonicus N 2 17 Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger AF 4 15 Reithrodontomys Plains Harvest Mouse montanus AF 3 31 G5T3T4/SH Reithrodontomys Western Harvest Mouse megalotis AF 3 24 Peromyscus Deer Mouse maniculatus AF 2 8 White Footed Mouse Peromyscus leucopus AF 4 21 Perognathus fasciatus Olive-backed Pocket Mouse infraluteus AF 2 or 3 44 G5T?/S2? Hispid Pocket Mouse Chaetodipus hispidus AF 3 12 Perognathus Plains Pocket Mouse flavescens flavescens AF 2 24 G5T4/SH Silky Pocket Mouse bunkeri Perognathus flavus ssp. bunkeri AF 3 49 S4 Onychomys Northern Grasshopper Mouse leucogaster ssp. AF * 16 House Mouse Mus musculus AF * * Ord's Kangaroo Rat Dipodomys ordii AF 4 21 G5T4T5/S3 Prairie Vole Mycrotus ochrogaster AF 3 6 Black-tailed Prairie Dog Cynomys ludovicianus AF,CH,N 1 40 C G4S4 Plains Pocket Gopher Geomys bursarius AF,CH 1 30 Carnivora, Suborder Fissipedia Coyote Canis latrans AF,CH,N 1 2 Swift Fox Vulpes velox CH 3 51 SC G3T?Q/S3 Urocyon Gray Fox cinereoargenteus N 2 14 S4 Red Fox Vulpes vulpes AF,CH,N 2 22 C-3 Likelihood PIF COVERS Agency to be Scores Scores Sensitive Federal Colorado CNHP Common Name Scientific Name Source Present Tot/PT/AI Total Biology Status Status Status Ranking Black Bear Ursus americanus AF,CH,N 1 5 Raccoon Procyon lotor AF,N 2 6 Badger Taxidea taxus AF,CH 1 6 Long-tailed Weasel Mustela frenata AF 2 19 Striped Skunk Mephitis mephitis AF,N,CH 1 4 Conepatus mesoleucus Hog-Nosed Skunk figginsi N 3 38 G4/SH Mountain Lion Felis concolor AF,CH,N 1 11 Bobcat Lynx rufus CH,N 1 11 S4 Artiodactyla Mule Deer Odocoileus hemionus AF,CH,N 1 4 White-tailed Deer Odocoileus virginianus CH 4 6 Canadian Elk (Wapiti) Cervus elaphus AF,CH 1 3 Pronghorn Antelope Antilocapra americana AF 4 18 BIRDS M= Migrant, W= Winter residents, R= Year-Round resident, B= Breeding/Nesting Site, S= Summer resident with no information on breeding/nesting sites. Loons (Gaviidae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but is found nearby. Common Loon- M Gavia immer FC 5 * 22 Grebes (Popicipedidae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but are found nearby. Pied-billed Grebe- R Podilymbus podiceps FC 5 13/3/2 37 Horned Grebe- W Podiceps auritus FC 5 * 22 Eared Grebe- R Podiceps nigricollis FC 5 13/3/2 36 Aechmophorus Western Grebe- R occidentalis FC 5 20/3/3 33 Clark's Grebe- S Aechmophorus clarkii FC 5 20/3/3 45 Comorants (Phalacrocoracidae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but is found nearby. C-4 Likelihood PIF COVERS Agency to be Scores Scores Sensitive Federal Colorado CNHP Common Name Scientific Name Source Present Tot/PT/AI Total Biology Status Status Status Ranking Double-crested Comorant- S Phalacrocorax auritus FC 5 13/3/2 31 Herons (Ardeidae) Wetland species. that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but are found nearby Great Blue Heron- B Ardea herodias AF,FL,FC 5 13/1/3 34 American Bittern- B Botaurus lentiginosus FC 5 17/3/2 51 Great Egret- M? Ardea albus FC 5 * 40 Snowy Egret- S Egretta thula FC 5 13/3/2 36 G5/S2B,SZN Green-backed Heron- S Butorides striatus FC 5 * * Black-crowned Night-Heron-S Nycticorax nycticorax FC 5 13/2/2 37 Ibises (Threskionithidae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but is found nearby. White-faced Ibis- S Plegadis chihi FC 5 16/3/3 45 FS,BLM G5/S2B,SZN Geese, Ducks (Anatidae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but are found nearby. Mallard- R Anas platyrynchos AF,FL,FC 5 11/3/1 10 Gadwall- R Anas strepera AF,FL,FC 5 14/3/2 28 American Wigeon- M Anas americana AF,FL,FC 5 16/3/3 17 Canada Goose- R Branta canadensis FL,FC 5 13/3/3 2 Green-winged Teal- B Anas crecca FL,FC 5 14/3/3 12 Blue-winged Teal- W Anas discors FL,FC 5 14/3/2 14 Cinnamon Teal- W Anas cyanoptera FL,FC 5 18/3/3 22 Bufflehead- M Bucephala albeola FL,FC 5 17/3/2 18 Hooded Merganser- B Lophodytes cucullatus FC 5 19/3/2 44 Common Merganser- W Mergus merganser FL,FC 5 15/3/3 11 Red-breaasted Merganser- W Mergus serrator FC 5 * 9 Tundra Swan- W? Cygnus columbianus FC 5 * 22 Greater White-fronted Goose- W? Anser albfrons FC 5 * 17 Snow Goose- W? Chen caerulescens FC 5 * 28 Wood Duck- R Aix sponsa FC 5 16/3/2 15 Northern Pintail- R Anas acuta FC 5 13/3/2 43 C-5 Likelihood PIF COVERS Agency to be Scores Scores Sensitive Federal Colorado CNHP Common Name Scientific Name Source Present Tot/PT/AI Total Biology Status Status Status Ranking Northern Shoveler- R Anas clypeata FC 5 14/3/2 13 Canvasback- R Aythya valisineria FC 5 18/3/2 36 Redhead- R Aythya americana FC 5 20/3/3 15 Ruddy Duck- B Oxyura jamaicensis FC 5 18/3/3 17 Ring-necked Duck- R Aythya collaris FC 5 19/3/3 10 Lesser Scaup- R Aythya affinis FC 5 16/3/3 47 Common Goldeneye- W Bucephala clangula FC 5 * 15 Rails, Coots (Rallisae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but are found nearby. American Coot- R Fulica americana AF,FC 5 12/3/3 13 Black Rail- M Laterallus jamaicensis FC 5 24/3/2 57 Virginia Rail- R Rallus limicola FC 5 16/3/3 42 Sora- B Porzana carolina FC 5 14/4/2 40 Cranes (Gruidae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but is found nearby. Grus canadensis Greater Sandhill Crane- B? tabida FC 5 * 56 ST FS G5T4/S2B,S4N Plovers (Charadriidae) *indicates wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but is found nearby. *Black-bellied Plover- M? Pluvialis squatarola FC 5 * 35 Charadrius Semipalmated Plover- M semipalmatus FC 4 * 33 Killdeer- B Charadrius vociferus AF,FL,FC 2 * 38 Mountain Plover- B Charadrius montanus FC,CH 2 28/2/5 65 FS,BLM PT SC G2/S2B,SZN Stilts, Avocets () Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but are found nearby. Himantopus Black-necked Stilt- B mexicanus FC 5 15/3/2 35 G5/S3B,SZN Recurvirostra American Avovet- B americana FC 5 21/3/3 41 Sandpipers (Scoolopacidae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but are found nearby. C-6 Likelihood PIF COVERS Agency to be Scores Scores Sensitive Federal Colorado CNHP Common Name Scientific Name Source Present Tot/PT/AI Total Biology Status Status Status Ranking Spotted Sandpiper- B Actitis macularia FL,FC 5 13/3/3 20 Common Snipe- R Gallinago gallinago FL,FC 5 13/1/4 12 Greater Yellowlegs- M? Tringa melanoleuca FC 5 * 14 Lesser Yellowlegs- M? Tringa flavipes FC 5 * 11 Solitary Sandpiper- M Tringa solitaria FC 5 * 8 Catoptophorus Willet- M? semipalmatus FC 5 * 15 Whimbrel- M? Numenius phaeopus FC 5 * 47 Long-billed Curlew- B Numenius americanus FC 5 23/4/3 54 FS,BLM SC G5/S2B,SZN Marbled Godwit- B? Limosa fedoa FC 5 18/3/1 44 Sanderling- M? Calidris alba FC 5 * 18 Semipalmated Sandpiper- M Calidris pusilla FC 5 * 20 Western Sandpiper- M? Calidris mauri FC 5 * 21 Least Sandpiper- M? Calidris minutilla FC 5 * 13 Baird's Sandpiper- M Calidris bairii FC 5 * 15 Pectoral Sandpiper- M Calidris melanotos FC 5 * 37 Stilt Sandpiper- M Calidris himantopus FC 5 * 44 Limnodromus Long-billed Dowitcher- M scolopaceus FC 5 * 13 American Woodcock- ? Scolopax minor FC 5 * * Wilson's Phalarope- B Phalaropus tricolor FC 5 20/3/3 24 G5/S4B,S4N Red-necked Phalarope- M Phalaropus lobatus FC 5 * 10 Gulls, Terns (Laridae) Wetland species that may not be present at Cheyenne Mountain, but are found nearby.
Recommended publications
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017

    List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017

    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
  • A Classification of the Rallidae

    A Classification of the Rallidae

    A CLASSIFICATION OF THE RALLIDAE STARRY L. OLSON HE family Rallidae, containing over 150 living or recently extinct species T and having one of the widest distributions of any family of terrestrial vertebrates, has, in proportion to its size and interest, received less study than perhaps any other major group of birds. The only two attempts at a classifi- cation of all of the recent rallid genera are those of Sharpe (1894) and Peters (1934). Although each of these lists has some merit, neither is satisfactory in reflecting relationships between the genera and both often separate closely related groups. In the past, no attempt has been made to identify the more primitive members of the Rallidae or to illuminate evolutionary trends in the family. Lists almost invariably begin with the genus Rdus which is actually one of the most specialized genera of the family and does not represent an ancestral or primitive stock. One of the difficulties of rallid taxonomy arises from the relative homo- geneity of the family, rails for the most part being rather generalized birds with few groups having morphological modifications that clearly define them. As a consequence, particularly well-marked genera have been elevated to subfamily rank on the basis of characters that in more diverse families would not be considered as significant. Another weakness of former classifications of the family arose from what Mayr (194933) referred to as the “instability of the morphology of rails.” This “instability of morphology,” while seeming to belie what I have just said about homogeneity, refers only to the characteristics associated with flightlessness-a condition that appears with great regularity in island rails and which has evolved many times.
  • BULLETIN of the ALLYN MUSEUM 3621 Bayshore Rd

    BULLETIN of the ALLYN MUSEUM 3621 Bayshore Rd

    BULLETIN OF THE ALLYN MUSEUM 3621 Bayshore Rd. Sarasota, Florida 33580 Published By The Florida State Museum University of Florida Gainesville. Florida 32611 Number 107 30 December 1986 A REVIEW OF THE SATYRINE GENUS NEOMINOIS, WITH DESCRIPriONS OF THREE NEW SUBSPECIES George T. Austin Nevada State Museum and Historical Society 700 Twin Lakes Drive, Las Vegas, Nevada 89107 In recent years, revisions of several genera of satyrine butterflies have been undertaken (e. g., Miller 1972, 1974, 1976, 19781. To this, I wish to add a revision of the genus Neominois. Neominois Scudder TYPE SPECIES: Satyrus ridingsii W. H. Edwards by original designation (Scudder 1875b, p. 2411 Satyrus W. H. Edwards (1865, p. 2011, Rea.kirt (1866, p. 1451, W. H. Edwards (1872, p. 251, Strecker (1873, p. 291, W. H. Edwards (1874b, p. 261, W. H. Edwards (1874c, p. 5421, Mead (1875, p. 7741, W. H. Edwards (1875, p. 7931, Scudder (1875a, p. 871, Strecker (1878a, p. 1291, Strecker (1878b, p. 1561, Brown (1964, p. 3551 Chionobas W. H. Edwards (1870, p. 1921, W. H. Edwards (1872, p. 271, Elwes and Edwards (1893, p. 4591, W. H. Edwards (1874b, p. 281, Brown (1964, p. 3571 Hipparchia Kirby (1871, p. 891, W. H. Edwards (1877, p. 351, Kirby (1877, p. 7051, Brooklyn Ent. Soc. (1881, p. 31, W. H. Edwards (1884, p. [7)l, Maynard (1891, p. 1151, Cockerell (1893, p. 3541, Elwes and Edwards (1893, p. 4591, Hanham (1900, p. 3661 Neominois Scudder (1875b, p. 2411, Strecker (1876, p. 1181, Scudder (1878, p. 2541, Elwes and Edwards (1893, p. 4591, W.
  • Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    Papilio (New Series) #24 2016 Issn 2372-9449

    PAPILIO (NEW SERIES) #24 2016 ISSN 2372-9449 MEAD’S BUTTERFLIES IN COLORADO, 1871 by James A. Scott, Ph.D. in entomology, University of California Berkeley, 1972 (e-mail: [email protected]) Table of Contents Introduction………………………………………………………..……….……………….p. 1 Locations of Localities Mentioned Below…………………………………..……..……….p. 7 Summary of Butterflies Collected at Mead’s Major Localities………………….…..……..p. 8 Mead’s Butterflies, Sorted by Butterfly Species…………………………………………..p. 11 Diary of Mead’s Travels and Butterflies Collected……………………………….……….p. 43 Identity of Mead’s Field Names for Butterflies he Collected……………………….…….p. 64 Discussion and Conclusions………………………………………………….……………p. 66 Acknowledgments………………………………………………………….……………...p. 67 Literature Cited……………………………………………………………….………...….p. 67 Table 1………………………………………………………………………….………..….p. 6 Table 2……………………………………………………………………………………..p. 37 Introduction Theodore L. Mead (1852-1936) visited central Colorado from June to September 1871 to collect butterflies. Considerable effort has been spent trying to determine the identities of the butterflies he collected for his future father-in-law William Henry Edwards, and where he collected them. Brown (1956) tried to deduce his itinerary based on the specimens and the few letters etc. available to him then. Brown (1964-1987) designated lectotypes and neotypes for the names of the butterflies that William Henry Edwards described, including 24 based on Mead’s specimens. Brown & Brown (1996) published many later-discovered letters written by Mead describing his travels and collections. Calhoun (2013) purchased Mead’s journal and published Mead’s brief journal descriptions of his collecting efforts and his travels by stage and horseback and walking, and Calhoun commented on some of the butterflies he collected (especially lectotypes). Calhoun (2015a) published an abbreviated summary of Mead’s travels using those improved locations from the journal etc., and detailed the type localities of some of the butterflies named from Mead specimens.
  • The Radiation of Satyrini Butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): A

    The Radiation of Satyrini Butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): A

    Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2011, 161, 64–87. With 8 figures The radiation of Satyrini butterflies (Nymphalidae: Satyrinae): a challenge for phylogenetic methods CARLOS PEÑA1,2*, SÖREN NYLIN1 and NIKLAS WAHLBERG1,3 1Department of Zoology, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden 2Museo de Historia Natural, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Av. Arenales 1256, Apartado 14-0434, Lima-14, Peru 3Laboratory of Genetics, Department of Biology, University of Turku, 20014 Turku, Finland Received 24 February 2009; accepted for publication 1 September 2009 We have inferred the most comprehensive phylogenetic hypothesis to date of butterflies in the tribe Satyrini. In order to obtain a hypothesis of relationships, we used maximum parsimony and model-based methods with 4435 bp of DNA sequences from mitochondrial and nuclear genes for 179 taxa (130 genera and eight out-groups). We estimated dates of origin and diversification for major clades, and performed a biogeographic analysis using a dispersal–vicariance framework, in order to infer a scenario of the biogeographical history of the group. We found long-branch taxa that affected the accuracy of all three methods. Moreover, different methods produced incongruent phylogenies. We found that Satyrini appeared around 42 Mya in either the Neotropical or the Eastern Palaearctic, Oriental, and/or Indo-Australian regions, and underwent a quick radiation between 32 and 24 Mya, during which time most of its component subtribes originated. Several factors might have been important for the diversification of Satyrini: the ability to feed on grasses; early habitat shift into open, non-forest habitats; and geographic bridges, which permitted dispersal over marine barriers, enabling the geographic expansions of ancestors to new environ- ments that provided opportunities for geographic differentiation, and diversification.
  • Avian Premaxilla and Tarsometatarsus from The

    Avian Premaxilla and Tarsometatarsus from The

    762 ShortCommunications andCommentaries [Auk,Vol. 112 The Auk 112(3):762-767, 1995 Avian Premaxilla and Tarsometatarsusfrom the Uppermost Cretaceous of Montana ANDRZEJ ELZANOWSKIa AND MICHAEL K. BRETT-$URMAN2 •Departmentof VertebrateZoology, National Museum of NaturalHistory, SmithsonianInstitution, Washington, D.C. 20560, USA; and 2Departmentof Geology,George Washington University, Washington, D.C. 20052,USA Despitea variety of fragmentary,apparently neog- is rounded and smooth,and the sidesare very steep. nathousavian fossilsknown from the uppermostCre- The largest among the neurovascularforamina scat- taceousdeposits (Brodkorb 1963, Olson 1985, Olson tered on each side are two elongatedorsal foramina: and Parris 1987),we still lack even an approximate the vessel from the rostral one coursed rostrad, whereas idea of how many neognathouslineages survived be- the vesselfrom the caudalone apparentlybifurcated yond the Cretaceous/Tertiaryboundary. Most of the into a smaller rostral and a larger caudal branch. In Maastrichtian avian bones reveal a charadriiform or addition, a number of smaller openingsperforates transitional charadriiform-gruiform morphology, eachside of the symphysis. which may be plesiomorphicfor most (Olson 1985) The ventral surfaceof the premaxillarysymphysis but probably not all of the neognaths(Elzanowski is strongly concave(Fig. lc, d). There are no distinct 1995). Other than that, there is some fossil evidence neurovascularforamina on the ventral (palatal) sur- for the existence of loons in the Cretaceous(Olson face,with the possibleexception of one small opening 1992)and mostly indirect evidencefor the pre-Ter- on the left side. The palatal shelvesof the premaxilla tiary origins of the relict pelecaniforms(Phaethon- begin from the symphysialtip and graduallybroaden tidae and Fregatidae) and procellariiforms (Elza- caudally where each of them occupiesone-third of nowski and Gaiton 1991).
  • Samia Cynthia in New Jersey Book Review, Market- Place, Metamorphosis, Announcements, Membership Updates

    Samia Cynthia in New Jersey Book Review, Market- Place, Metamorphosis, Announcements, Membership Updates

    ________________________________________________________________________________________ Volume 61, Number 4 Winter 2019 www.lepsoc.org ________________________________________________________________________________________ Inside: Butterflies of Papua Southern Pearly Eyes in exotic Louisiana venue Philippine butterflies and moths: a new website The Lepidopterists’ Society collecting statement updated Lep Soc, Southern Lep Soc, and Assoc of Trop Lep combined meeting Butterfly vicariance in southeast Asia Samia cynthia in New Jersey Book Review, Market- place, Metamorphosis, Announcements, Membership Updates ... and more! ________________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ Contents www.lepsoc.org ________________________________________________________ Digital Collecting -- Butterflies of Papua, Indonesia ____________________________________ Bill Berthet. .......................................................................................... 159 Volume 61, Number 4 Butterfly vicariance in Southeast Asia Winter 2019 John Grehan. ........................................................................................ 168 Metamorphosis. ....................................................................................... 171 The Lepidopterists’ Society is a non-profit ed- Membership Updates. ucational and scientific organization. The ob- Chris Grinter. ....................................................................................... 171
  • Phylogenetic Relatedness of Erebia Medusa and E. Epipsodea (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Confirmed

    Phylogenetic Relatedness of Erebia Medusa and E. Epipsodea (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) Confirmed

    Eur. J. Entomol. 110(2): 379–382, 2013 http://www.eje.cz/pdfs/110/2/379 ISSN 1210-5759 (print), 1802-8829 (online) Phylogenetic relatedness of Erebia medusa and E. epipsodea (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae) confirmed 1 2, 3 4 MARTINA ŠEMELÁKOVÁ , PETER PRISTAŠ and ĽUBOMÍR PANIGAJ 1 Institute of Biology and Ecology, Department of Cellular Biology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Moyzesova 11, 041 54 Košice, Slovakia; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Institute of Animal Physiology, Slovak Academy of Science, Soltesovej 4–6, 040 01 Košice, Slovakia 3 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Matej Bel University, Tajovskeho 40, 841 04 Banská Bystrica, Slovakia 4 Institute of Biology and Ecology, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Pavol Jozef Šafárik University in Košice, Moyzesova 11, 041 54 Košice, Slovakia Key words. Lepidoptera, Nymphalidae, Erebia medusa, E. epipsodea, mtDNA, COI, ND1 Abstract. The extensive genus Erebia is divided into several groups of species according to phylogenetic relatedness. The species Erebia medusa was assigned to the medusa group and E. epipsodea to the alberganus group. A detailed study of the morphology of their copulatory organs indicated that these species are closely related and based on this E. epipsodea was transferred to the medusa group. Phylogenetic analyses of the gene sequences of mitochondrial cytochrome C oxidase subunit I (COI) and mitochondrial NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 (ND1) confirm that E. medusa and E. epipsodea are closely related. A possible scenario is that the North American species, E. episodea, evolved after exclusion/isolation from E. medusa, whose current centre of distribution is in Europe.
  • BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean

    BUTTERFLIES in Thewest Indies of the Caribbean

    PO Box 9021, Wilmington, DE 19809, USA E-mail: [email protected]@focusonnature.com Phone: Toll-free in USA 1-888-721-3555 oror 302/529-1876302/529-1876 BUTTERFLIES and MOTHS in the West Indies of the Caribbean in Antigua and Barbuda the Bahamas Barbados the Cayman Islands Cuba Dominica the Dominican Republic Guadeloupe Jamaica Montserrat Puerto Rico Saint Lucia Saint Vincent the Virgin Islands and the ABC islands of Aruba, Bonaire, and Curacao Butterflies in the Caribbean exclusively in Trinidad & Tobago are not in this list. Focus On Nature Tours in the Caribbean have been in: January, February, March, April, May, July, and December. Upper right photo: a HISPANIOLAN KING, Anetia jaegeri, photographed during the FONT tour in the Dominican Republic in February 2012. The genus is nearly entirely in West Indian islands, the species is nearly restricted to Hispaniola. This list of Butterflies of the West Indies compiled by Armas Hill Among the butterfly groupings in this list, links to: Swallowtails: family PAPILIONIDAE with the genera: Battus, Papilio, Parides Whites, Yellows, Sulphurs: family PIERIDAE Mimic-whites: subfamily DISMORPHIINAE with the genus: Dismorphia Subfamily PIERINAE withwith thethe genera:genera: Ascia,Ascia, Ganyra,Ganyra, Glutophrissa,Glutophrissa, MeleteMelete Subfamily COLIADINAE with the genera: Abaeis, Anteos, Aphrissa, Eurema, Kricogonia, Nathalis, Phoebis, Pyrisitia, Zerene Gossamer Wings: family LYCAENIDAE Hairstreaks: subfamily THECLINAE with the genera: Allosmaitia, Calycopis, Chlorostrymon, Cyanophrys,
  • Yukon Butterflies a Guide to Yukon Butterflies

    Yukon Butterflies a Guide to Yukon Butterflies

    Wildlife Viewing Yukon butterflies A guide to Yukon butterflies Where to find them Currently, about 91 species of butterflies, representing five families, are known from Yukon, but scientists expect to discover more. Finding butterflies in Yukon is easy. Just look in any natural, open area on a warm, sunny day. Two excellent butterfly viewing spots are Keno Hill and the Blackstone Uplands. Pick up Yukon’s Wildlife Viewing Guide to find these and other wildlife viewing hotspots. Visitors follow an old mining road Viewing tips to explore the alpine on top of Keno Hill. This booklet will help you view and identify some of the more common butterflies, and a few distinctive but less common species. Additional species are mentioned but not illustrated. In some cases, © Government of Yukon 2019 you will need a detailed book, such as , ISBN 978-1-55362-862-2 The Butterflies of Canada to identify the exact species that you have seen. All photos by Crispin Guppy except as follows: In the Alpine (p.ii) Some Yukon butterflies, by Ryan Agar; Cerisy’s Sphynx moth (p.2) by Sara Nielsen; Anicia such as the large swallowtails, Checkerspot (p.2) by Bruce Bennett; swallowtails (p.3) by Bruce are bright to advertise their Bennett; Freija Fritillary (p.12) by Sonja Stange; Gallium Sphinx presence to mates. Others are caterpillar (p.19) by William Kleeden (www.yukonexplorer.com); coloured in dull earth tones Butterfly hike at Keno (p.21) by Peter Long; Alpine Interpretive that allow them to hide from bird Centre (p.22) by Bruce Bennett.
  • California Clapper Rail (Rallus Longirostris Obsoletus) 5-Year Review

    California Clapper Rail (Rallus Longirostris Obsoletus) 5-Year Review

    California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus ) 5-Year Review: Summary and Evaluation Photo by Allen Edwards U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Sacramento Fish and Wildlife Office Sacramento, California April 2013 5-YEAR REVIEW California clapper rail (Rallus longirostris obsoletus) I. GENERAL INFORMATION Purpose of 5-Year Reviews: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is required by section 4(c)(2) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) to conduct a status review of each listed species at least once every 5 years. The purpose of a 5-year review is to evaluate whether or not the species’ status has changed since it was listed (or since the most recent 5-year review). Based on the 5-year review, we recommend whether the species should be removed from the list of endangered and threatened species, be changed in status from endangered to threatened, or be changed in status from threatened to endangered. The California clapper rail was listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Preservation Act in 1970, so was not subject to the current listing processes and, therefore, did not include an analysis of threats to the California clapper rail. In this 5-year review, we will consider listing of this species as endangered or threatened based on the existence of threats attributable to one or more of the five threat factors described in section 4(a)(1) of the Act, and we must consider these same five factors in any subsequent consideration of reclassification or delisting of this species. We will consider the best available scientific and commercial data on the species, and focus on new information available since the species was listed.
  • A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument

    A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument

    A Guide to Arthropods Bandelier National Monument Top left: Melanoplus akinus Top right: Vanessa cardui Bottom left: Elodes sp. Bottom right: Wolf Spider (Family Lycosidae) by David Lightfoot Compiled by Theresa Murphy Nov 2012 In collaboration with Collin Haffey, Craig Allen, David Lightfoot, Sandra Brantley and Kay Beeley WHAT ARE ARTHROPODS? And why are they important? What’s the difference between Arthropods and Insects? Most of this guide is comprised of insects. These are animals that have three body segments- head, thorax, and abdomen, three pairs of legs, and usually have wings, although there are several wingless forms of insects. Insects are of the Class Insecta and they make up the largest class of the phylum called Arthropoda (arthropods). However, the phylum Arthopoda includes other groups as well including Crustacea (crabs, lobsters, shrimps, barnacles, etc.), Myriapoda (millipedes, centipedes, etc.) and Arachnida (scorpions, king crabs, spiders, mites, ticks, etc.). Arthropods including insects and all other animals in this phylum are characterized as animals with a tough outer exoskeleton or body-shell and flexible jointed limbs that allow the animal to move. Although this guide is comprised mostly of insects, some members of the Myriapoda and Arachnida can also be found here. Remember they are all arthropods but only some of them are true ‘insects’. Entomologist - A scientist who focuses on the study of insects! What’s bugging entomologists? Although we tend to call all insects ‘bugs’ according to entomology a ‘true bug’ must be of the Order Hemiptera. So what exactly makes an insect a bug? Insects in the order Hemiptera have sucking, beak-like mouthparts, which are tucked under their “chin” when Metallic Green Bee (Agapostemon sp.) not in use.