Disease Risks

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Disease Risks ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT – DISEASE RISKS DigsFish Services Report: DF 11-02 5 August 2011 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT REPORT- DISEASE RISKS Prepared by: Ben Diggles PhD Prepared for: New Zealand King Salmon PO Box1180 Nelson 7040 New Zealand DigsFish Services Pty. Ltd. 32 Bowsprit Cres, Banksia Beach Bribie Island, QLD 4507 AUSTRALIA Ph/fax +61 7 3408 8443 Mob 0403773592 [email protected] www.digsfish.com Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms............................................................................................................................ 3 Executive Summary........................................................................................................................................... 4 Description of Plan Change and Resource Consents ........................................................................................ 5 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 6 2.0 Review of Disease Agents in Global Salmon Seacage Culture .............................................................7 2.1 Viral diseases ..................................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 Bacterial diseases............................................................................................................................... 9 2.3 Fungal diseases ................................................................................................................................ 10 2.4 Protozoal diseases ............................................................................................................................ 11 2.5 Metazoan diseases ............................................................................................................................ 13 3.0 Description of the existing environment -Disease Agents in New Zealand Salmon ........................... 15 4.0 Assessment of Environmental Effects................................................................................................. 17 4.1 Hazard Identification........................................................................................................................ 17 4.2 Elimination of insignificant diseases ................................................................................................. 19 4.2.1 Non-infectious diseases ................................................................................................................ 19 4.2.2 Bacteria........................................................................................................................................ 19 4.2.3 Fungi............................................................................................................................................ 21 4.2.4 Protozoa ....................................................................................................................................... 22 4.2.5 Metazoa........................................................................................................................................ 22 4.3 The diseases of concern requiring detailed risk assessment................................................................ 24 5.0 Detailed Risk Assessment.................................................................................................................... 25 5.1 Infection with Aquatic Birnavirus...................................................................................................... 25 5.2 Amoebic/Nodular Gill Disease.......................................................................................................... 29 5.3 Sea lice............................................................................................................................................. 32 5.4 Whirling Disease .............................................................................................................................. 37 6.0 Recommended Options for Disease Risk Minimisation ..................................................................... 40 6.1 Number and location of seacages...................................................................................................... 40 6.1.1 Independent farm management areas............................................................................................. 41 6.1.2 Year class farming and site fallowing............................................................................................ 42 6.2 Buffer zones surrounding farming areas............................................................................................ 43 6.3 Harvesting........................................................................................................................................ 44 6.3.1 Harvesting method........................................................................................................................ 44 6.3.2 Processing premises...................................................................................................................... 44 7.0 Conclusions ......................................................................................................................................... 45 1 . Final Report 5 August 2011 www.digsfish.com 8.0 References........................................................................................................................................... 46 Appendix 1 – Risk Assessment Methodology.................................................................................................. 64 Release assessment ................................................................................................................................... 64 Exposure assessment................................................................................................................................. 64 Consequence assessment........................................................................................................................... 65 Risk estimation ......................................................................................................................................... 67 Risk mitigation.......................................................................................................................................... 68 Option evaluation...................................................................................................................................... 68 2 . Final Report 5 August 2011 www.digsfish.com Abbreviations and Acronyms AGD Amoebic Gill Disease IHN Infectious Haematopoietic Necrosis IP intraperitoneal IPN Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis IPNV Infectious Pancreatic Necrosis Virus ISA Infectious Salmon Anaemia ISAV Infectious Salmon Anaemia Virus OIE World Organisation for Animal Health (formerly Office International des Epizooties). PLB Piscirickettsia -like bacteria RA Risk Analysis SD Sleeping Disease SPD Salmon Pancreas Disease TAB Tasmanian aquabirnavirus TCID 50 Tissue culture infectious dose 50% endpoint VHS Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia VHSV Viral Haemorrhagic Septicaemia Virus Version control First draft 31 May 2011 Second draft 9 June 2011 Third draft 15 June 2011 Draft Final Report 20 June 2011 Final report 5 August 2011 Disclaimer: DigsFish Services have taken all reasonable care and diligence to ensure the information contained in this report is accurate at the time of publication. However this report is offered as general advice only, we do not warrant the accuracy of the information contained within and accept no liability for any loss or damage that may result from reliance on this information. 3 . Final Report 5 August 2011 www.digsfish.com Executive Summary This Environmental Assessment Report was developed to assess potential disease risks associated with a planning change and resource consent application undertaken by New Zealand King Salmon (NZ King Salmon), who wish to expand their King salmon ( Oncorhynchus tshawytscha ) aquaculture operations in the Marlborough Sounds to another 8 sites covering some 12 additional hectares of surface farm structures. Hazard identification for the known disease agents reported from wild and cultured salmon in New Zealand identified 20 infectious agents and 13 non-infectious diseases of cultured salmon. The non-infectious diseases do not pose any threat to wild aquatic animals, and hence were not considered further. From the remaining potential hazards, 4 disease agents (Aquatic birnavirus, sea lice, amoebic/nodular gill disease and whirling disease) were classified as diseases of concern that required detailed risk assessment. The outcomes of the risk assessments found that none of these disease agents are likely to cause significant disease in wild fishes or other aquatic animals, indicating that no additional risk management measures are necessary at this time. However, an unquantifiable risk remains that biosecurity leaks could allow exotic diseases to be introduced, and/or new endemic diseases could emerge in salmon aquaculture in New Zealand at some time in the future. The proposed changes, if approved, will allow the company to expand without increasing stocking densities on individual farms, while permitting establishment of 3 independent farm management areas separated by ideal buffer zones. These arrangements will therefore allow NZ King Salmon to implement worlds best practice
Recommended publications
  • Molecular Data and the Evolutionary History of Dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Un
    Molecular data and the evolutionary history of dinoflagellates by Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria Diplom, Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat Heidelberg, 1993 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES Department of Botany We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA November 2003 © Juan Fernando Saldarriaga Echavarria, 2003 ABSTRACT New sequences of ribosomal and protein genes were combined with available morphological and paleontological data to produce a phylogenetic framework for dinoflagellates. The evolutionary history of some of the major morphological features of the group was then investigated in the light of that framework. Phylogenetic trees of dinoflagellates based on the small subunit ribosomal RNA gene (SSU) are generally poorly resolved but include many well- supported clades, and while combined analyses of SSU and LSU (large subunit ribosomal RNA) improve the support for several nodes, they are still generally unsatisfactory. Protein-gene based trees lack the degree of species representation necessary for meaningful in-group phylogenetic analyses, but do provide important insights to the phylogenetic position of dinoflagellates as a whole and on the identity of their close relatives. Molecular data agree with paleontology in suggesting an early evolutionary radiation of the group, but whereas paleontological data include only taxa with fossilizable cysts, the new data examined here establish that this radiation event included all dinokaryotic lineages, including athecate forms. Plastids were lost and replaced many times in dinoflagellates, a situation entirely unique for this group. Histones could well have been lost earlier in the lineage than previously assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • (Alveolata) As Inferred from Hsp90 and Actin Phylogenies1
    J. Phycol. 40, 341–350 (2004) r 2004 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2004.03129.x EARLY EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY OF DINOFLAGELLATES AND APICOMPLEXANS (ALVEOLATA) AS INFERRED FROM HSP90 AND ACTIN PHYLOGENIES1 Brian S. Leander2 and Patrick J. Keeling Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Program in Evolutionary Biology, Departments of Botany and Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Three extremely diverse groups of unicellular The Alveolata is one of the most biologically diverse eukaryotes comprise the Alveolata: ciliates, dino- supergroups of eukaryotic microorganisms, consisting flagellates, and apicomplexans. The vast phenotypic of ciliates, dinoflagellates, apicomplexans, and several distances between the three groups along with the minor lineages. Although molecular phylogenies un- enigmatic distribution of plastids and the economic equivocally support the monophyly of alveolates, and medical importance of several representative members of the group share only a few derived species (e.g. Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, Perkinsus, and morphological features, such as distinctive patterns of Pfiesteria) have stimulated a great deal of specula- cortical vesicles (syn. alveoli or amphiesmal vesicles) tion on the early evolutionary history of alveolates. subtending the plasma membrane and presumptive A robust phylogenetic framework for alveolate pinocytotic structures, called ‘‘micropores’’ (Cavalier- diversity will provide the context necessary for Smith 1993, Siddall et al. 1997, Patterson
    [Show full text]
  • The Florida Red Tide Dinoflagellate Karenia Brevis
    G Model HARALG-488; No of Pages 11 Harmful Algae xxx (2009) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Harmful Algae journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/hal Review The Florida red tide dinoflagellate Karenia brevis: New insights into cellular and molecular processes underlying bloom dynamics Frances M. Van Dolah a,*, Kristy B. Lidie a, Emily A. Monroe a, Debashish Bhattacharya b, Lisa Campbell c, Gregory J. Doucette a, Daniel Kamykowski d a Marine Biotoxins Program, NOAA Center for Coastal Environmental Health and Biomolecular Resarch, Charleston, SC, United States b Department of Biological Sciences and Roy J. Carver Center for Comparative Genomics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, United States c Department of Oceanography, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States d Department of Marine, Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The dinoflagellate Karenia brevis is responsible for nearly annual red tides in the Gulf of Mexico that Available online xxx cause extensive marine mortalities and human illness due to the production of brevetoxins. Although the mechanisms regulating its bloom dynamics and toxicity have received considerable attention, Keywords: investigation into these processes at the cellular and molecular level has only begun in earnest during Bacterial–algal interactions the past decade. This review provides an overview of the recent advances in our understanding of the Cell cycle cellular and molecular biology on K. brevis. Several molecular resources developed for K. brevis, including Dinoflagellate cDNA and genomic DNA libraries, DNA microarrays, metagenomic libraries, and probes for population Florida red tide genetics, have revolutionized our ability to investigate fundamental questions about K.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6.2-Assessment of Harmful Algae Bloom
    Maryland’s Coastal Bays: Ecosystem Health Assessment Chapter 6.2 Chapter 6.2 Assessment of harmful algae bloom species in the Maryland Coastal Bays Catherine Wazniak Maryland Department of Natural Resources, Tidewater Ecosystem Assessment, Annapolis, MD 21401 Abstract Thirteen potentially harmful algae taxa have been identified in the Maryland Coastal Bays: Aureococcus anophagefferens (brown tide), Pfiesteria piscicida and P. shumwayae, Chloromorum/ Chattonella spp., Heterosigma akashiwo, Fibrocapsa japonica, Prorocentrum minimum, Dinophysis spp., Amphidinium spp., Pseudo-nitzchia spp., Karlodinium micrum and two macroalgae genera (Gracilaria, Chaetomorpha). Presence of potentially toxic species is richest in the polluted tributaries of St. Martin River and Newport Bay. Approximately 5% of the phytoplankton species identified for Maryland’s Coastal Bays represent potentially harmful algal bloom (HAB) species. The HABs are recognized for their potentially toxic properties and, in some cases, their ability to produce large blooms negatively affecting light and dissolved oxygen resources. Brown tide (Aureococcus anophagefferens) has been the most widespread and prolific HAB species in the area in recent years, producing growth impacts to juvenile clams in test studies and potential impacts to sea grass distribution and growth (see Chapter 7.1). Macroalgal fluctuations may be evidence of a system balancing on the edge of a eutrophic (nutrient- enriched) state (see chapter 4). No evidence of toxic activity has been detected among the Coastal Bays phytoplankton. However, species such as Pseudo-nitzschia seriata, Prorocentrum minimum, Pfiesteria piscicida, Dinophysis acuminata and Karlodinium micrum have produced positive toxic bioassays or generated detectable toxins in Chesapeake Bay. Pfiesteria piscicida was retrospectively considered as the likely causative organism in a large historical fish kill on the Indian River, Delaware.
    [Show full text]
  • The Inhibitory Effects of Garlic (Allium Sativum) and Diallyl Trisulfide on Alexandrium Tamarense and Other Harmful Algal Species
    J Appl Phycol (2008) 20:349–358 DOI 10.1007/s10811-007-9262-8 The Inhibitory Effects of Garlic (Allium sativum) and Diallyl Trisulfide on Alexandrium tamarense and other Harmful Algal Species L. H. Zhou & T. L. Zheng & X. H. Chen & X. Wang & S. B. Chen & Y. Tian & H. S. Hong Received: 30 March 2007 /Revised and Accepted: 21 September 2007 /Published online: 10 January 2008 # Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2007 Abstract Using cell suspension ability as an indicator, we effective was a concentration of 0.04% on A. tamarense and studied the inhibitory effect of garlic (Allium sativum) and S. trochoidea. Moreover, the higher the concentration, the diallyl trisulfide on six species of red tide causing algae. stronger was the inhibition, and a high inhibitory rate (IR) This included: the inhibition by 0.08% garlic solution of could be maintained for at least three days when the garlic five algal species — Alexandrium tamarense, Scrippsiella concentration was above 0.04%. For A. tamarense, it was trochoidea, Alexandrium catenella, Alexandrium minutum also found that the longer the inhibitory time and the higher and Alexandrium satoanum; the effects of garlic concen- the concentration, the lower was the rate of resumed cell tration on the inhibition of A. tamarense, S. trochoidea and activity. On the contrary, garlic solution could not inhibit A. Chaetoceros sp.; the effects of inhibitory time on the minutum or Chaetoceros sp.; 2) The IR to A. tamarense was rejuvenation of algal cells; and the effects of heating and reduced slightly as the heating time of the garlic solution preservation time on algal inhibition by garlic solution.
    [Show full text]
  • Morphological Studies of the Dinoflagellate Karenia Papilionacea in Culture
    MORPHOLOGICAL STUDIES OF THE DINOFLAGELLATE KARENIA PAPILIONACEA IN CULTURE Michelle R. Stuart A Thesis Submitted to the University of North Carolina Wilmington in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Department of Biology and Marine Biology University of North Carolina Wilmington 2011 Approved by Advisory Committee Alison R. Taylor Richard M. Dillaman Carmelo R. Tomas Chair Accepted by __________________________ Dean, Graduate School This thesis has been prepared in the style and format consistent with the journal Journal of Phycology ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................... iv ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................................. v DEDICATION ............................................................................................................................... vi LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................ vii LIST OF FIGURES ..................................................................................................................... viii INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS .................................................................................................... 5 RESULTS
    [Show full text]
  • Karenia Brevis: Adverse Impacts on Human Health and Larger Marine Related Animal Mortality from Red Tides
    Karenia brevis: Adverse Impacts on Human Health and Larger Marine Related Animal Mortality from Red Tides Vickie Vang Environmental Studies 190 12/14/2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................................................ 2 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................................. 3 BIOLOGY ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Genus Karenia .................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Vertical Migratory .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5 Temperature and Salinity ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 Nourishment .................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 Brevotoxin ........................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Harmful Algal Blooms in Coastal Water of China in 2011
    Harmful Algae Blooms in Coastal Waters of China in 2011 Ruixiang Li, Zhu Mingyuan and Wang Zongling First Institute of Oceanography,SOA,Qingdao ,China E-mail:[email protected] The frequency and Area of HAB in China Sea in 2011 total affected area of 6076 km2 Season of occurrence of HABs in 2011 HAB events month There were 21 species of HAB in 2011 13 records : Prorocentrum donghaience bloom only in East China Sea 11 records: Noctiluca scintillans 7 records: Skeletonema costatum 3 records: Akashiwo sanguinea 2 recoeds: Phaeocystis globosa, Heterosigma akashiwo, Gyrodinium spirale, 1 record;Cochlodinium polykrikoidis,Prorocentrum minimun, Karenia breve,Chattonella,sp.,Chattonella antiqua, Gymnodinium sp.(may be Karlodinium ) , Pseudonitzschia pungens, Eucampia zoodiacus, Leptocylindrus danicus, Rhizosolenia delicatula, et.al., Aureococcus anophagefferen ( Belong to PELAGOPHYCEAE) Bohai Sea East China Sea Yellow Sea South China Sea HAB events average HABs in coastal waters of china from 2007 to 2011 Area of HABs in coastal waters of china from 2007 to 2011 Bohai Sea East China Sea Yellow Sea South China Sea ) 2 km ( HAB Area average Compared with HAB in recent 5 years, HABs in 2011 were lowest both in frequency and area affected. The season with frequent HAB was from May to September Percent of dinoflagellates and other flagellates bloom year The HAB caused by dinoflagellates and other flagellates were increased. Noctiluca scintillans bloom Area and times of bloom in 2011 km2 km2 km2 km2 km2 dinoflagellate bloom diatom bloom other bloom
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Analysis of Brachidinium Capitatum (Dinophyceae) from the Gulf of Mexico Indicates Membership in the Kareniaceae1
    J. Phycol. 47, 366–374 (2011) Ó 2011 Phycological Society of America DOI: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2011.00960.x PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF BRACHIDINIUM CAPITATUM (DINOPHYCEAE) FROM THE GULF OF MEXICO INDICATES MEMBERSHIP IN THE KARENIACEAE1 Darren W. Henrichs Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA Heidi M. Sosik, Robert J. Olson Department of Biology, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543, USA and Lisa Campbell2 Department of Oceanography and Department of Biology, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA Brachidinium capitatum F. J. R. Taylor, typically ITS, internal transcribed spacer; ML, maximum considered a rare oceanic dinoflagellate, and one likelihood; MP, maximum parsimony which has not been cultured, was observed at ele- ) vated abundances (up to 65 cells Æ mL 1) at a coastal station in the western Gulf of Mexico in the fall of 2007. Continuous data from the Imaging FlowCyto- Members of the genus Brachidinium have been bot (IFCB) provided cell images that documented observed in samples from throughout the world, yet the bloom during 3 weeks in early November. they remain poorly known because they have always Guided by IFCB observations, field collection per- been recorded at extremely low abundances. The mitted phylogenetic analysis and evaluation of the type species, B. capitatum, originally described by relationship between Brachidinium and Karenia. Taylor (1963) from the southwest Indian Ocean, Sequences from SSU, LSU, internal transcribed has also been identified from the Pacific Ocean spacer (ITS), and cox1 regions for B. capitatum were (Hernandez-Becerril and Bravo-Sierra 2004, Gomez compared with five other species of Karenia; all 2006), the northeast Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterra- B.
    [Show full text]
  • Stressed Induced Changes in <I>Karenia Brevis</I> Ribosomal
    The University of Southern Mississippi The Aquila Digital Community Master's Theses Spring 5-1-2015 Stressed Induced Changes in Karenia brevis Ribosomal RNA David Scott Jayroe University of Southern Mississippi Follow this and additional works at: https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses Part of the Bioinformatics Commons, Integrative Biology Commons, Marine Biology Commons, and the Microbiology Commons Recommended Citation Jayroe, David Scott, "Stressed Induced Changes in Karenia brevis Ribosomal RNA" (2015). Master's Theses. 104. https://aquila.usm.edu/masters_theses/104 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by The Aquila Digital Community. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of The Aquila Digital Community. For more information, please contact [email protected]. The University of Southern Mississippi STRESSED INDUCED CHANGES IN KARENIA BREVIS RIBOSOMAL RNA by David Scott Jayroe A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of The University of Southern Mississippi in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Approved: Dr. Shahid Karim_____________________ Committee Chair Dr. Glen Shearer______________________ Dr. Tim McLean______________________ Dr. Karen Coats______________________ Dean of the Graduate School May 2015 ABSTRACT STRESSED INDUCED CHANGES IN KARENIA BREVIS RIBOSOMAL RNA by David Scott Jayroe May 2015 Karenia brevis is a toxic marine dinoflagellate that causes harmful algal blooms (HABs), also known as red tides, in the Gulf of Mexico. These blooms are responsible for massive fish kills, shellfish bed contaminations, adverse human health effects, and vast economic loss. For these reasons, extensive research has gone into understanding the mechanisms and dynamics of bloom behavior by studying K.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Harmful Algal Blooms in the Coastal Mediterranean Sea, with a Focus on Greek Waters
    diversity Review Review of Harmful Algal Blooms in the Coastal Mediterranean Sea, with a Focus on Greek Waters Christina Tsikoti 1 and Savvas Genitsaris 2,* 1 School of Humanities, Social Sciences and Economics, International Hellenic University, 57001 Thermi, Greece; [email protected] 2 Section of Ecology and Taxonomy, School of Biology, Zografou Campus, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 16784 Athens, Greece * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +30-210-7274249 Abstract: Anthropogenic marine eutrophication has been recognized as one of the major threats to aquatic ecosystem health. In recent years, eutrophication phenomena, prompted by global warming and population increase, have stimulated the proliferation of potentially harmful algal taxa resulting in the prevalence of frequent and intense harmful algal blooms (HABs) in coastal areas. Numerous coastal areas of the Mediterranean Sea (MS) are under environmental pressures arising from human activities that are driving ecosystem degradation and resulting in the increase of the supply of nutrient inputs. In this review, we aim to present the recent situation regarding the appearance of HABs in Mediterranean coastal areas linked to anthropogenic eutrophication, to highlight the features and particularities of the MS, and to summarize the harmful phytoplankton outbreaks along the length of coastal areas of many localities. Furthermore, we focus on HABs documented in Greek coastal areas according to the causative algal species, the period of occurrence, and the induced damage in human and ecosystem health. The occurrence of eutrophication-induced HAB incidents during the past two decades is emphasized. Citation: Tsikoti, C.; Genitsaris, S. Review of Harmful Algal Blooms in Keywords: HABs; Mediterranean Sea; eutrophication; coastal; phytoplankton; toxin; ecosystem the Coastal Mediterranean Sea, with a health; disruptive blooms Focus on Greek Waters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effects of the Red Tide Producing Dinoflagellate, Karenia Brevis, And
    UNF Digital Commons UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations Student Scholarship 2018 The effects of the red tide producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis, and associated brevetoxins on viability and sublethal stress responses in scleractinian coral: a potential regional stressor to coral reefs David A. Reynolds University of North Florida Suggested Citation Reynolds, David A., "The effects of the red tide producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis, and associated brevetoxins on viability and sublethal stress responses in scleractinian coral: a potential regional stressor to coral reefs" (2018). UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 829. https://digitalcommons.unf.edu/etd/829 This Master's Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Scholarship at UNF Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in UNF Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of UNF Digital Commons. For more information, please contact Digital Projects. © 2018 All Rights Reserved The effects of the red tide producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis, and associated brevetoxins on viability and sublethal stress responses in scleractinian coral: a potential regional stressor to coral reefs by David Anthony Reynolds A thesis submitted to the Department of Biology in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology UNIVERSITY OF NORTH FLORIDA COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCE August, 2018 i CERTIFICATE OF APPROVAL The effects of the red tide producing dinoflagellate, Karenia brevis, and associated brevetoxins on viability and sublethal stress responses in scleractinian coral: a potential regional stressor to coral reefs The thesis of David A. Reynolds is approved: Date ____________________________________ __________________ Dr. Cliff Ross Committee Chairperson ____________________________________ __________________ Dr.
    [Show full text]