DOCSLIB.ORG

History and Status of the American Black Bear in Mississippi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
History and Status of the American Black Bear in Mississippi History and status of the American black bear in Mississippi Stephanie L. Simek1,5, Jerrold L. Belant1, Brad W. Young2, Catherine Shropshire3, and Bruce D. Leopold4 1Carnivore Ecology Laboratory, Forest and Wildlife Research Center, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA 2Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks, 1505 Eastover Drive, Jackson, MS 39211, USA 3Mississippi Wildlife Federation, 517 Cobblestone Court, Suite 2, Madison, MS 39110, USA 4Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, Box 9690, Mississippi State, MS 39762, USA Abstract: Historically abundant throughout Mississippi, American black bears (Ursus americanus) have declined due to habitat loss and overharvest. By the early 1900s, the bear population was estimated at ,12 individuals, and Mississippi closed black bear hunting in 1932. However, habitat loss continued and by 1980 suitable habitat was estimated at 20% (20,234 km2) of historic levels (101,171 km2) with the decline continuing. Although black bear abundance is currently unknown, a recent increase in occurrence reports and documented reproduction suggests the population may be increasing. There have been 21 reported nuisance complaints since 2006, of which 7 were apiary damage. Additionally, 31 bear mortalities were reported since 1972; 80% were human caused. Government and private organizations have emphasized education on bear ecology and human–bear coexistence, while habitat restoration through land retirement programs (e.g., Conservation Reserve and Wetland Reserve Programs) will improve habitat abundance and suitability for black bears. Black bears are naturally recolonizing Mississippi with current state agency management directed at supporting population reestablishment through habitat conservation and species protection. Key words: American black bear, Mississippi, recolonization, Ursus americanus, wildlife conservation Ursus 23(2):159–167 (2012) American black bears (Ursus americanus) are the repatriation in neighboring Louisiana and Arkansas largest native carnivore in the southeastern United (Clark et al. 2002). States (Hall 1981, Brown 1993, Haas 1999, Pelton Information about black bear population status in 2000, Masterson 2006). Historical declines in black Mississippi is limited. Also, much of this information bear distribution and abundance in this region have is in state or federal technical reports, status updates been attributed to the fur and market trade, sport from workshop proceedings, university theses and hunting, illegal take, and land use changes (Wooding dissertations, and reliable web sites (Miller 1993; et al. 1994, Young 2006). Mississippi, formerly an Shropshire 1996; Bowman 1999; Young 2005, 2006). important state for bear hunting regionally, is one of Although black bear management goals have been the few southeastern states with a non-hunted bear developed, it is difficult to assess management success population; others include Louisiana, Alabama, and without understanding the species status and distri- Florida (Schullery 1988, Pelton et al. 1998). Histor- bution. Our objective was to compile available data to ically, black bears occurred throughout Mississippi provide a synthesis of the history, current status, and and currently, at least 2 subspecies (U. a. luteolus and management of black bears in Mississippi. U. a. americanus) are present (Young 2006). In 1932, the black bear population was estimated at ,12 individuals (Cook 1943). Since the 1990s, the Study area 2 Mississippi black bear population appears to be Mississippi encompasses 123,514 km of land, with increasing (Young 2006), a likely consequence of about 65% forested (Mississippi Forestry Commis- sion [MFC] 2008). The topography of Mississippi is [email protected] generally flat, ranging from 0 to 247 m elevation. The 159 160 STATUS OF AMERICAN BLACK BEAR IN MISSISSIPPI N Simek et al. climate is subtropical, with an average July temper- history in Mississippi. We compiled previous and ature of 27.1uC and average January temperature of current state and federal laws governing black bear 7.6uC (US Department of Commerce 2012). The management (i.e., harvest management, habitat southeastern portion of the state is primarily forested, management, and species protection), current Mis- whereas the Delta region in the northwest and west sissippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks central parts of the state is primarily agricultural land (MDWFP) bear management objectives, and previ- with forested areas along the Mississippi River. ous black bear research in Mississippi. Common trees in Mississippi include cottonwood We compiled location data of bears captured (Populus spp.), elm (Ulmus spp.), hickory (Carya during research and management efforts as well as spp.), oak (Quercus spp.), pecan (Carya spp.), pine occurrence reports maintained and verified by (Pinus spp.), bald cypress (Taxodium distichum), and MDWFP, USFWS, and Mississippi State University sweetgum (Liquidambar spp.) (Bowman 1999, MFC (MSU) through 2010. Reports included bear obser- 2006). Common overstory species include boxelder vations (e.g., sightings or tracks), road kills, and (Acer negundo), pecan, elm, and cypress along the illegal harvests. Reports were verified based on Mississippi River levees; red maple (A. rubrum) and descriptions reported, images submitted, or site mockernut hickory (C. tomentosa) in mid-central inspections. For reports where multiple observation Mississippi; and flowering dogwood (Cornus florida), methods were recorded, the more conclusive evidence longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), and slash pine (P. was used to identify bear presence (e.g., a sighting elliotii) in southeast Mississippi (Bowman 1999). was more conclusive than tracks). We used verified Common understory species range from poison ivy reports and those from previous surveys (Shropshire (Rhus radicans) along the Mississippi River levees; 1996) to summarize frequency of black bear occur- blackberry (Rubus allegheniensis and R. argutus) and rence and distribution before and since 2002. A more saw briar (Smilax bona-nox) in mid-central Missis- unified and consistent reporting system was initiated sippi; to yaupon (Ilex vomitoria) and muscadine (Vitis by MDWFP in 2002; therefore, we expected an rotundifolia) in southeast Mississippi (Bowman 1999). increase in verified occurrence reports. Consequently, Bowman (1999) reported 6 National Forests and 4 we used MDWFP-verified occurrence reports record- National Wildlife Refuges in Mississippi that com- ed with physical locations from 2002–10 to map bined provide 5,000 km2 of suitable, but potentially occurrences by county. unoccupied, bear habitat. Bowman (1999) also We summarized human–bear interactions through reported 61,800 km2 of additional private forests as September 2011, including mortalities due to vehicle suitable, but potentially unoccupied, bear habitat in collisions, illegal take, and other causes (e.g., accidental Mississippi. Agricultural and urban lands are esti- mortality from capture). We also summarized reported mated at 45,325 km2 and 2,397 km2, respectively, human–bear conflicts by type of conflict (e.g., apiary (Mississippi Department of Agricultural Commission damage). We described recent outreach programs [MDAC] 2012; US Census Bureau [USCB] 2009). conducted by state, federal, and private entities. We Statewide human population growth has been ,0.5% reviewed black bear-related legal actions, including annually (USCB 2012). codes and regulations, and fines or actions imparted for illegal activities. We also described current habitat and species conservation measures for black bears, Methods including habitat restoration programs, and estimated We compiled published and unpublished literature extent of areas conserved in Mississippi as suitable but and records of black bears in Mississippi. We unoccupied black bear habitat. assembled information into categories similar to previous syntheses for bears in the southeastern United States (Eastridge 2005, McMullin and Par- Historical records of black bears khurst 2008): historical perspective, management and in Mississippi research, distribution, human–bear interactions, edu- The earliest records of black bears in Mississippi cation, and conservation. We used geographic desig- were fossil remains from Lowndes and Noxubee nations defined by the US Fish and Wildlife Service counties that date to Rancholabrean and Holcene (USFWS 1992; Fig. 1) to characterize distribution of deposits about 12,000 years before present (Kurte´n subspecies. We summarized black bear natural and Kaye 1982). Black bears were used by Native Ursus 23(2):159–167 (2012) STATUS OF AMERICAN BLACK BEAR IN MISSISSIPPI N Simek et al. 161 Fig. 1. Reported occurrences of American black bears in Mississippi, 2002–10. Federally-designated geographic ranges of Louisiana black bear (U. a. luteolus) and American black bear are south and north of subspecies division line, respectively. Ursus 23(2):159–167 (2012) 162 STATUS OF AMERICAN BLACK BEAR IN MISSISSIPPI N Simek et al. Americans in Mississippi for religious ceremonies counties in a 1978 statewide survey by the Mississippi and as a source of food, clothing, and currency with Game and Fish Commission (Shropshire 1996). European explorers in the 1500s (Swanton 1979, The first management action for conserving black Young 2006). bears occurred in 1932 when the newly created During the late 1600s and early 1700s, when Mississippi Game
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Yaupon Holly Culture and Pest Management for Tea Production and Ornamental Use1 Matthew A
    ENY-2054 Yaupon Holly Culture and Pest Management for Tea Production and Ornamental Use1 Matthew A. Borden, Mark A. Wilhelm, and Adam G. Dale2 Yaupon holly, Ilex vomitoria Aiton (Figure 1), is an ever- green woody plant native to the southeastern United States. The species is widely used as a landscape ornamental plant because it tolerates a wide range of soil and environmental conditions, is available in various forms, and is well-suited for Florida-Friendly Landscaping™ (https://edis.ifas.ufl. edu/topic_ffl) because it requires few inputs and attracts wildlife, especially native birds. Recently, there has been a resurgence of interest in cultivating the plant for the Figure 1. Yaupon holly, Ilex vomitoria. caffeinated beverages that can be made from its leaves. Credits: Jeff McMillian, hosted by the USDA-NRCS PLANTS Database. Although commonly called yaupon tea, it should be noted Illustration credit: Mary Vaux Walcott, North American Wild Flowers, vol. that the word “tea” properly refers to beverages produced 3 (1925) from the tea plant, Camellia sinensis. Infusions made with all other plants, such as herbs and yaupon holly, are Yaupon holly typically blooms for several weeks between considered tisanes. For commercial growers and homeown- March and May with small white flowers, sometimes tinged ers to effectively grow and maintain yaupon holly for tea with pink. As with all Ilex species, yaupon holly is dioe- production or as an ornamental plant, it is important to cious, meaning individual plants are either male or female. be familiar with its pest susceptibility and management Male flowers are more abundant and produce pollen, while recommendations.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology of the Kit Fox (Vulpes Macrotis)
    Author's Personal Copy J. Comp. Path. 2019, Vol. 167, 60e72 Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/jcpa DISEASE IN WILDLIFE OR EXOTIC SPECIES Dental and Temporomandibular Joint Pathology of the Kit Fox (Vulpes macrotis) N. Yanagisawa*, R. E. Wilson*, P. H. Kass† and F. J. M. Verstraete* *Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences and † Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, California, USA Summary Skull specimens from 836 kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) were examined macroscopically according to predefined criteria; 559 specimens were included in this study. The study group consisted of 248 (44.4%) females, 267 (47.8%) males and 44 (7.9%) specimens of unknown sex; 128 (22.9%) skulls were from young adults and 431 (77.1%) were from adults. Of the 23,478 possible teeth, 21,883 teeth (93.2%) were present for examina- tion, 45 (1.9%) were absent congenitally, 405 (1.7%) were acquired losses and 1,145 (4.9%) were missing ar- tefactually. No persistent deciduous teeth were observed. Eight (0.04%) supernumerary teeth were found in seven (1.3%) specimens and 13 (0.06%) teeth from 12 (2.1%) specimens were malformed. Root number vari- ation was present in 20.3% (403/1,984) of the present maxillary and mandibular first premolar teeth. Eleven (2.0%) foxes had lesions consistent with enamel hypoplasia and 77 (13.8%) had fenestrations in the maxillary alveolar bone. Periodontitis and attrition/abrasion affected the majority of foxes (71.6% and 90.5%, respec- tively).
    [Show full text]
  • The Biomolecular Archaeology of the Black Drink: Alkaloid Residue Analysis of Ilex Vomitoria on Experimental Vessels and Applications for Prehistoric Specimens
    The Biomolecular Archaeology of the Black Drink: Alkaloid Residue Analysis of Ilex vomitoria on Experimental Vessels and Applications for Prehistoric Specimens Paper presented at the 2011 Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Jacksonville, Florida Shannon Tushingham1*, Matthew Palumbo2, Charles H. McNutt3, and Ulla Anderson4 1Department of Anthropology, Washington State University’ 2Department of Biology, University of Florida; 3Department of Anthropology, University of Memphis; 4Department of Chemistry, UC Berkeley; *Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Early historic accounts document widespread use of a purgative known as “the black drink”, a caffeinated ceremonial tea famous for its use in purification rituals by elite males. The beverage was prepared from roasted leaves and twigs of yaupon holly (Ilex vomitoria), an evergreen shrub native to the southeastern coastal plain. Prehistoric use is poorly understood but often associated with shell cups found in mortuary contexts and the SECC. Our work, designed to track ancient use of psychoactive plants via Gas Chromatography‐Mass Spectrometry, includes identification of medicinal tea biomarkers, experimentation with brewing black drink, and residue extraction from pottery/shell specimens. Sampling included preparing and extracting a range of experimental vessels which served different functions in black drink cooking and consumption (cooking vessels, clay and shell cups), with extractions taken directly from the vessels and from tea residue on vessel interiors. Our findings suggest that chemical changes occur through the cooking process, but the presence of the biomarker caffeine remains stable and correlated the experimental vessels to the Ilex vomitoria plant in all but one case. We also describe the non‐destructive method we developed where alkaloid residues can be extracted directly from the matrix of prehistoric shell cups and pottery vessels through a sonication process.
    [Show full text]
  • Deer, Elk, Bear, Moose, Lynx, Bobcat, Waterfowl
    Hunt ID: 1501-CA-AL-G-L-MDeerWDeerElkBBearMooseLynxBobcatWaterfowl-M1SR-O1G-N2EGE Great Economy Deer and Moose Hunts south of Edmonton, Alberta, Canada American Hunters trekking to Canada for low cost moose, along with big Mule Deer and Whitetail and been pleasantly surprised by the weather and temperatures that they were greeted by when they hunted British Columbia, located in Canada, north of Washington State. Canada should be and is cold but there are exceptions, if you know where to go. In BC if you stay on the western Side of the Rocky Mountains the weather is quite mild because it is warmed by the Pacific Ocean. If you hunt east of the Rocky Mountains, what I call the Canadian Interior it can be as much as 50 degrees colder depending on the time of the year. The area has now preference point requirements, the Outfitter has his allotted vouchers so you can get a reasonably priced license and, in most cases, less than you can get for the same animal in the US as a non-resident. You don’t even buy the voucher from the Outfitter it is part of his hunt cost because without it you could not get a license anyway. Travel is easy and the residents are friendly. Like anywhere outside the US you will need a easy to acquire Passport if you don’t have one, just don’t wait until the last minute to get one for $10 from your local Post office by where you live. The one thing in Canada is if you have a felony on your record Canada will not allow you into their safe Country.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Fur Harvester Digest 3 SEASON DATES and BAG LIMITS
    2021 Michigan Fur Harvester Digest RAP (Report All Poaching): Call or Text (800) 292-7800 Michigan.gov/Trapping Table of Contents Furbearer Management ...................................................................3 Season Dates and Bag Limits ..........................................................4 License Types and Fees ....................................................................6 License Types and Fees by Age .......................................................6 Purchasing a License .......................................................................6 Apprentice & Youth Hunting .............................................................9 Fur Harvester License .....................................................................10 Kill Tags, Registration, and Incidental Catch .................................11 When and Where to Hunt/Trap ...................................................... 14 Hunting Hours and Zone Boundaries .............................................14 Hunting and Trapping on Public Land ............................................18 Safety Zones, Right-of-Ways, Waterways .......................................20 Hunting and Trapping on Private Land ...........................................20 Equipment and Fur Harvester Rules ............................................. 21 Use of Bait When Hunting and Trapping ........................................21 Hunting with Dogs ...........................................................................21 Equipment Regulations ...................................................................22
    [Show full text]
  • Brown Bear (Ursus Arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende Images by John Schoen
    Brown Bear (Ursus arctos) John Schoen and Scott Gende images by John Schoen Two hundred years ago, brown (also known as grizzly) bears were abundant and widely distributed across western North America from the Mississippi River to the Pacific and from northern Mexico to the Arctic (Trevino and Jonkel 1986). Following settlement of the west, brown bear populations south of Canada declined significantly and now occupy only a fraction of their original range, where the brown bear has been listed as threatened since 1975 (Servheen 1989, 1990). Today, Alaska remains the last stronghold in North America for this adaptable, large omnivore (Miller and Schoen 1999) (Fig 1). Brown bears are indigenous to Southeastern Alaska (Southeast), and on the northern islands they occur in some of the highest-density FIG 1. Brown bears occur throughout much of southern populations on earth (Schoen and Beier 1990, Miller et coastal Alaska where they are closely associated with salmon spawning streams. Although brown bears and grizzly bears al. 1997). are the same species, northern and interior populations are The brown bear in Southeast is highly valued by commonly called grizzlies while southern coastal populations big game hunters, bear viewers, and general wildlife are referred to as brown bears. Because of the availability of abundant, high-quality food (e.g. salmon), brown bears enthusiasts. Hiking up a fish stream on the northern are generally much larger, occur at high densities, and have islands of Admiralty, Baranof, or Chichagof during late smaller home ranges than grizzly bears. summer reveals a network of deeply rutted bear trails winding through tunnels of devil’s club (Oplopanx (Klein 1965, MacDonald and Cook 1999) (Fig 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Sensitivity Index Guidelines Version 2.0
    NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS ORCA 115 Environmental Sensitivity Index Guidelines Version 2.0 October 1997 Seattle, Washington noaa NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION National Ocean Service Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment National Ocean Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration U.S. Department of Commerce The Office of Ocean Resources Conservation and Assessment (ORCA) provides decisionmakers comprehensive, scientific information on characteristics of the oceans, coastal areas, and estuaries of the United States of America. The information ranges from strategic, national assessments of coastal and estuarine environmental quality to real-time information for navigation or hazardous materials spill response. Through its National Status and Trends (NS&T) Program, ORCA uses uniform techniques to monitor toxic chemical contamination of bottom-feeding fish, mussels and oysters, and sediments at about 300 locations throughout the United States. A related NS&T Program of directed research examines the relationships between contaminant exposure and indicators of biological responses in fish and shellfish. Through the Hazardous Materials Response and Assessment Division (HAZMAT) Scientific Support Coordination program, ORCA provides critical scientific support for planning and responding to spills of oil or hazardous materials into coastal environments. Technical guidance includes spill trajectory predictions, chemical hazard analyses, and assessments of the sensitivity of marine and estuarine environments to spills. To fulfill the responsibilities of the Secretary of Commerce as a trustee for living marine resources, HAZMAT’s Coastal Resource Coordination program provides technical support to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency during all phases of the remedial process to protect the environment and restore natural resources at hundreds of waste sites each year.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of Cougars (Puma Concolor) in North-Central Montana
    Ecology of Cougars (Puma concolor) in north-central Montana: Distribution, resource selection, dynamics, harvest, and conservation design Chippewa Cree Tribal Wildlife Program In cooperation with World Wildlife Fund Northern Great Plains Program Bozeman, Montana Final Report April 2012 Kyran Kunkel1, Tim Vosburgh2, and Hugh Robinson3 1World Wildlife Fund; presently University of Montana, Gallatin Gateway, MT; 2Chippewa Cree Tribal Wildlife Program; presently Bureau of Land Management, Lander, WY; 3University of Montana; presently Panthera, New York, NY Space for Cougar photo Photo credit: Kyran Kunkel 1 Ecology of Cougars (Puma concolor) in north-central Montana: Distribution, resource selection, dynamics, harvest, and conservation design Kyran Kunkel, Tim Vosburgh, and Hugh Robinson Chippewa Cree Tribal Wildlife Program in cooperation with World Wildlife Fund, Final Report April 2012 Citation: Kunkel, K, T. Vosburgh, and H. Robinson. 2012. Ecology of cougars (Puma concolor) in north-central Montana. Final Report to the US Fish and Wildlife Service. World Wildlife Fund Northern Great Plains Program 202 S. Black, Ste 3 Bozeman, MT 59715 P.O. Box 7276 Bozeman, Montana 59771 (406) 582-0236 To learn more, visit www.worldwildlife.org/ngp/ ©2010 WWF. All rights reserved by the World Wildlife Fund, Inc. 2 1. Introduction opportunity. Information about cougar recolonization and ecol- Increasing attention is being directed to ecological ogy of established populations will greatly enhance restoration in North American grasslands (Forrest et understanding and management of cougars in the al. 2004), particularly with respect to species that grasslands and prairie breaks of north-central Mon- have been lost or eliminated from these systems. tana. This is especially important because cougars Some species, notably wolf (Canis lupus), bear (Ursus have been little studied in this type of landscape (Wil- spp.), and cougar are expanding in Montana through liams 1992) and very little work has been conducted reintroductions and natural recolonization.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunting Regulations & Information
    HUNTING ON FEDERAL LANDS BIG GAME HUNTING REGULATIONS & INFORMATION State regulations and license requirements apply on federal lands. BEAR Some of the areas listed below may be closed to hunting. For Nonresidents hunting bear must possess a bear/wild boar hunting specific information, contact the appropriate federal entity: license (See page 8). Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge Restrictions It is unlawful to do any of the following: P.O. Box 1969, Manteo, NC 27954 ● Hunt bear in any areas not included in the listings below. Phone 252-473-1131 ● Take a cub (less than 50 pounds) or a female bear with cub(s). Camp Lejeune ● Take a bear with the use or aid of bait, which includes any salt, Conservation Law Enforcement Office, Assistant Chief of Staff salt lick, grain, fruit, honey, sugar-based material or substance, Installation Security and Safety Dept, Building PT-3, animal parts or animal products. Camp Lejeune, NC 28542 ● Place processed food products as bait in any area of the state with Phone 910-451-5226 an open season for taking black bears. Processed food products Cape Hatteras National Seashore are any food substance or flavoring that has been modified by 1401 National Park Drive, Manteo, NC 27954 the addi tion of ingredients or by treatment to modify its chem- Phone 252-473-2111 ical com position or form or to enhance its aroma or taste. This Cape Lookout National Seashore includes: food products enhanced by sugar, honey, syrups, oils, 131 Charles St., Harkers Island, NC 28531 salts, spices, peanut butter, grease, meat, bones, or blood; candies, Phone 252-728-2250 pastries, gum, and sugar blocks; and extracts of such products.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology of the European Badger (Meles Meles) in the Western Carpathian Mountains: a Review
    Wildl. Biol. Pract., 2016 Aug 12(3): 36-50 doi:10.2461/wbp.2016.eb.4 REVIEW Ecology of the European Badger (Meles meles) in the Western Carpathian Mountains: A Review R.W. Mysłajek1,*, S. Nowak2, A. Rożen3, K. Kurek2, M. Figura2 & B. Jędrzejewska4 1 Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Pawińskiego 5a, 02-106 Warszawa, Poland. 2 Association for Nature “Wolf”, Twardorzeczka 229, 34-324 Lipowa, Poland. 3 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland. 4 Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Waszkiewicza 1c, 17-230 Białowieża, Poland. * Corresponding author email: [email protected]. Keywords Abstract Altitudinal Gradient; This article summarizes the results of studies on the ecology of the European Diet Composition; badger (Meles meles) conducted in the Western Carpathians (S Poland) Meles meles; from 2002 to 2010. Badgers inhabiting the Carpathians use excavated setts Mustelidae; (53%), caves and rock crevices (43%), and burrows under human-made Sett Utilization; constructions (4%) as permanent shelters. Excavated setts are located up Spatial Organization. to 640 m a.s.l., but shelters in caves and crevices can be found as high as 1,050 m a.s.l. Badger setts are mostly located on slopes with southern, eastern or western exposure. Within their territories, ranging from 3.35 to 8.45 km2 (MCP100%), badgers may possess 1-12 setts. Family groups are small (mean = 2.3 badgers), population density is low (2.2 badgers/10 km2), as is reproduction (0.57 young/year/10 km2). Hunting by humans is the main mortality factor (0.37 badger/year/10 km2).
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Status Review for the Steller Sea Lion
    STATE OF WASHINGTON January 2015 Periodic Status Review for the Steller Sea Lion Gary J. Wiles The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife maintains a list of endangered, threatened, and sensitive species (Washington Administrative Codes 232-12-014 and 232-12-011, Appendix E). In 1990, the Washington Wildlife Commission adopted listing procedures developed by a group of citizens, interest groups, and state and federal agencies (Washington Administrative Code 232-12-297, Appendix A). The procedures include how species listings will be initiated, criteria for listing and delisting, a requirement for public review, the development of recovery or management plans, and the periodic review of listed species. The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife is directed to conduct reviews of each endangered, threatened, or sensitive wildlife species at least every five years after the date of its listing. The reviews are designed to include an update of the species status report to determine whether the status of the species warrants its current listing status or deserves reclassification. The agency notifies the general public and specific parties who have expressed their interest to the Department of the periodic status review at least one year prior to the five-year period so that they may submit new scientific data to be included in the review. The agency notifies the public of its recommendation at least 30 days prior to presenting the findings to the Fish and Wildlife Commission. In addition, if the agency determines that new information suggests that the classification of a species should be changed from its present state, the agency prepares documents to determine the environmental consequences of adopting the recommendations pursuant to requirements of the State Environmental Policy Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Holly - Ilex Sp
    Holly - Ilex sp. General Information: Available in both evergreen and deciduous species, holly is grown for its toothed glossy green leaves and its showy berries, which are red in most popular varieties, but can also be a showy yellow. Holly can range from under one foot to over 80, and is found in both temperate and tropical regions. Both male and female plants are needed for fruiting. Family: Aquifoliaceae Lighting: Can tolerate both sun and shade, although semi-shade is preferable in midsummer. Increased light tends to produce dense foliage. Temperature: In general, evergreen varieties are hardy to zone 7, deciduous varieties to zone 5. Most varieties will require some frost protection, and all varieties should be sheltered from strong or cold winds. Watering: Needs a fair amount of water, especially before fruit production. Holly can be badly damaged by draught. Reduce watering in winter. Likes misting, unless it is in full sun. Feeding: Every two weeks during growth, using half strength liquid plant food, or bonsai food. Pruning and wiring: Cut back new shoots to the one or two nodes closest to the trunk. Branches can be very brittle, so shaping is best done by pruning rather than wiring. If wiring must be done, it is best to wire in spring- summer, taking care to protect the bark. Leaf pruning to reduce leaf size is possible. Suitable for all sizes and styles, although the evergreen varieties do not take as well to broom style. Ilex asprella has a tendency towards horzontal growth which must be compensated for; Ilex vomitoria, on the other hand, has a strong inclination to grow upwards.
    [Show full text]