Appendix 11: Matters Raised by the Public the Preferred Route Corridor

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 11: Matters Raised by the Public the Preferred Route Corridor Appendix 11: Matters raised by the public The Preferred Route Corridor Theme Matter raised Regard had to the matter raised The Preferred Route Corridor A concern was raised that the route We recognise that some parts of each corridor takes in a significant number of route option will have pockets with en- existing settlements including Caxton, vironmental, infrastructure and housing The Preferred Bourn, Caldecote, Kingston, Toft and/ constraints. We will consider these factors Route Corridor or Comberton at the point where the as part of our work to select a preferred corridor is narrow, making avoidance route option, and further as we develop a difficult or impossible. preferred route alignment. A suggestion was made to consider Corridor N if Bedford Midland is ruled The Preferred Thank you for your suggestion. We have out on cost grounds, given that Corridor Route Corridor taken this into consideration. N would require less new railway than a route via Bedford. In their 2016 report “Partnering for Pros- perity”, the National Infrastructure Com- mission (NIC) suggested that “Maximising the potential of [the Oxford-Cambridge Expressway and East West Rail] to support well-connected and well-designed new communities will mean... developing the Comments were made suggestion that Oxford-Cambridge Expressway, along the The Preferred a broad corridor housing both the rail same broad corridor as East West Rail”. Route Corridor line and the new Expressway should be All five of our route options align with their considered. proposed approach. We will continue to work with Highways England to ensure that our respective pro- jects are designed and delivered in a way that best connects communities, takes account of environmental factors and sup- ports greater economic growth. 2 | East West Railway Company Bedford to Cambridge route option consultation - Public Feedback Report The Preferred Route Corridor Theme Matter raised Regard had to the matter raised Comments were made that the corridor The consultation prioritised route options does not serve communities to the north that approached Cambridge from the The Preferred and north west of Cambridge, including south. Key reasons for doing so were: Route Corridor Northstowe. It was identified that these areas will have the most housing and • A northern approach could require economic growth. changes to Cambridge North station and adding tracks along the West Anglia Main Concern that a possible route option Line The Preferred which approaches Cambridge from • The longer distance between Cambourne Route Corridor the north has not been included in the and Cambridge via a northern approach consultation. into Cambridge would make it more ex- pensive to build and operate and result in longer journey times • Trains would need to reverse at Cam- bridge if travelling to/from Ipswich and Norwich and east coast ports, increasing journey times • Approaching Cambridge from the north Comments were received suggesting a would not directly serve the proposed new corridor that approaches Cambridge Cambridge South station The Preferred slightly more northerly, running along Route Corridor the A428 to/near the Girton Interchange During the consultation we received a and entering Cambridge via the north- range of comments on the prioritisation of ern rail line from Ely. these southern approach route options, in- cluding a response from CamBedRailRoad (CBRR). We will carry out additional work to assess the case for a northern approach as part of the process to select a preferred route option. 3 | East West Railway Company Bedford to Cambridge route option consultation - Public Feedback Report The Preferred Route Corridor Theme Matter raised Regard had to the matter raised Concern that by proposing a separate route to the Oxford-Cambridge Ex- The consultation prioritised route options pressway, East West Rail would create that approached Cambridge from the two transport corridors and locations south. Key reasons for doing so were: for future housing growth, more than doubling the impacts compared to a • A northern approach could require The Preferred single East-West transport and growth changes to Cambridge North station and Route Corridor corridor. An alternative to East West adding tracks along the West Anglia Main Rail’s five proposed routes has been Line put forward by the CamBed Road Rail • The longer distance between Cambourne group, taking a northern approach into and Cambridge via a northern approach Cambridge, which appears to be a more into Cambridge would make it more ex- logical solution. pensive to build and operate and result in longer journey times Concern that the corridor to the north • Trains would need to reverse at Cam- of Cambridge seems to have been re- bridge if travelling to/from Ipswich and jected on the basis of connection to the Norwich and east coast ports, increasing rail line to Ipswich. There has been no The Preferred journey times consideration of the eastern section of Route Corridor • Approaching Cambridge from the north the East West Rail although it is implied would not directly serve the proposed new on page 6 of the consultation document Cambridge South station with the Bedford to Cambridge section being the central section. During the consultation we received a range of comments on the prioritisation of Concern that the CBBR route has not The Preferred these southern approach route options, in- been considered as part of the consul- Route Corridor cluding a response from CamBedRailRoad tation. (CBRR). We will carry out additional work Consideration should be given to in- to assess the case for a northern approach The Preferred clude linking developments around Wa- as part of the process to select a preferred Route Corridor terbeach, Oakington and Cambourne route option. within the corridor. 4 | East West Railway Company Bedford to Cambridge route option consultation - Public Feedback Report The Preferred Route Corridor Theme Matter raised Regard had to the matter raised It was identified that a routing from the The consultation prioritised route options north using the track of the guided bus- that approached Cambridge from the way from St Ives would be much easier south. Key reasons for doing so were: and quicker to construct and cause far less disruption to the area. It would al- • A northern approach could require low towns such as St Neots, Huntingdon changes to Cambridge North station and The Preferred and St Ives (and possibly Godmanches- adding tracks along the West Anglia Main Route Corridor ter depending on the route between the Line ECML and the guided busway) to ben- • The longer distance between Cambourne efit from significantly improved public and Cambridge via a northern approach transport services and would not need into Cambridge would make it more ex- new interchanges to be built in semi-ru- pensive to build and operate and result in ral locations that would not welcome longer journey times such unnecessary developments. • Trains would need to reverse at Cam- bridge if travelling to/from Ipswich and It was suggested that a corridor that Norwich and east coast ports, increasing covered Cambourne, Northstowe, His- journey times ton/Impington and Waterbeach would • Approaching Cambridge from the north The Preferred be more beneficial to improving quality would not directly serve the proposed new Route Corridor of travel for existing settlements in the Cambridge South station area and easing congestion in the A14 / A428 corridor by creating a much faster During the consultation we received a alternative. range of comments on the prioritisation of these southern approach route options, in- It was suggested that the Preferred cluding a response from CamBedRailRoad The Preferred Route Corridor should go to the north (CBRR). We will carry out additional work Route Corridor and approach Cambridge from the to assess the case for a northern approach north. as part of the process to select a preferred route option. 5 | East West Railway Company Bedford to Cambridge route option consultation - Public Feedback Report The Preferred Route Corridor Theme Matter raised Regard had to the matter raised The consultation prioritised route options that approached Cambridge from the south. Key reasons for doing so were: • A northern approach could require changes to Cambridge North station and The following corridor was suggested adding tracks along the West Anglia Main - Bedford Midland, Tempsford Area or Line South of St Neots, Cambourne, then • The longer distance between Cambourne Cambridge North via the guided bus- and Cambridge via a northern approach way. East West Rail to run from Cam- into Cambridge would make it more ex- bridgeshire North and new Cambridge pensive to build and operate and result in Science Park to new Oxford Science longer journey times Park ending Oxford Business Park • Trains would need to reverse at Cam- The Preferred (plans already drawn). North and south bridge if travelling to/from Ipswich and Route Corridor chords at Cambridgeshire North, new Norwich and east coast ports, increasing north and south chords at Coldhams journey times Junction (at East West Rail East`s cost) • Approaching Cambridge from the north Such a route then opens up Norwich, Ip- would not directly serve the proposed new swich and Felixstowe for direct services Cambridge South station to Oxford and Reading. But East West Rail trains should only be Oxford BP to During the consultation we received a Cambridge North. range of comments on the prioritisation of these southern approach route options, in- cluding a response from CamBedRailRoad (CBRR). We will carry out additional work to assess the case for a northern approach as part of the process to select a preferred route option. Comment noted. When the case for the new railway was initially considered and developed by Network Rail, the Depart- ment for Transport and others, twenty Comments were received disagreeing route corridors were considered, spanning The Preferred with the choice of Preferred Route Cor- the area from St Albans and Harlow to Route Corridor ridor and all route options.
Recommended publications
  • Download Complete Issue
    THE JOURNAL of the UNITED REFORMED CHURCH HISTORY SOCIETY (incorporating the Congregational Historical Society, founded 1899, and the Presbyterian Historical Society of England, founded 1913) EDITORS: Revd. Dr. R. BUICK KNOX, M.A., B.D., and Dr. CLYDE BINFIELD, M.A. VOL. 1. No. 9. APRIL 1977 CONTENTS Editorial and Notes 239 Cambridge Nonconformity 1660-1710: from Holcroft to Hussey, by Geoffrey F. Nuttall, M.A., D.D. 241 Saint John of Redenhall: a Unique Tombstone? by J. E. Newport, M.A., B.D., B.Litt. 259 Reviews 263 Editorial We record with gratitude the great service to the Church and to our Society of the Rev. Roy Drummond Whitehorn, M.A., D.D., M.B.E., who died in November 1976. He made his mark as professor and principal in Westminster College, Cambridge, and as a leading figure in the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church of England of which he was Moderator in 1950. He was also Moderator of the Free Church Federal Council and was one of the early architects of the United Reformed Church. He was President of the Presbyterian Historical Society and was for a time editor of its Journal. He was unable to take much part in the formation of our Society but it had his full support and good wishes. We record with equal gratitude the service of the Rev. William Gordon Robinson, M.A., Ph.D., who died in February 1977. Gordon Robinson ministered in Gatley and Oldham, but it was as Principal of Lancashire (later Northern) College in Manchester, from 1943 to 1968, that he became most widely known.
    [Show full text]
  • Railfuture Response to Consultations on the Proposed East Coast Main Line Timetable May 2022
    RAILFUTURE RESPONSE TO CONSULTATIONS ON THE PROPOSED EAST COAST MAIN LINE TIMETABLE MAY 2022 From: Railfuture Passenger Group & Branches: East Anglia, East Midlands, Lincolnshire, London & South East, North East, North West, Yorkshire & Scotland Submitted to: CrossCountry, Great Northern/Thameslink, LNER, Northern, TransPennine Express Copied to: East Midlands Railway, First East Coast Trains, Grand Central, Hull Trains, Network Rail & ScotRail Index Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Background ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 Executive Summary....................................................................................................................................... 2 Strategic Interventions .................................................................................................................................. 3 LNER ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 Responses to LNER Questionnaire ............................................................................................ 6 TransPennine Express .................................................................................................................................. 9 CrossCountry ...............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Borough of Bedford Local Access Forum
    Borough of Bedford Local Access Forum Minutes of meeting held on 17th January 2012 at Committee Room 2, Borough Hall commencing at 6.30pm Members Observers Bob Wallace - Chairman Phill Fox – Bedford Borough Council James Russell – Vice Chairman Simon Fisher – Bedford Borough Council David Mitchell Lizzie Barnicoat – Secretary Nigel Jacobs Apologies Barry Ingram Graham Watson Steve Bunstead David Binns Sarah Hollands Andy Gerrard Mark Egar 1. Welcome by Chairman Bob Wallace welcomed everyone to the meeting, thanking everyone for attending following the rearrangement. 2. Public Questions There were no public questions received, as no members of the public present. 3. Correspondence Received The Secretary detailed the correspondence received between meetings; a number of items had been received from the Eastern Region LAF Coordinator including an invite to the Natural England LAF Conference which the Chairman would be attending. There had also been information regarding Access for all training, Minerals and Waste consultation document, and Huddle training information which would be detailed further during the meeting. There was also correspondence regarding LAF representation on Local Nature Partnerships which also would be discussed during the meeting. Page 1 It was raised if the BoBLAF had received any information on funding for community paths, and discussions around promoting partnership work, it was noted that at present nothing had been received, however, the Secretary to circulate any information if received. The Forum Secretary had made an application to Project Involve which had been denied, those present then discussed how best to ensure information is shared and accessible to the public. It was agreed that in the interim period remaining with the Borough Council website as the access point to be continued with.
    [Show full text]
  • Warden Road, Ickwell, Biggleswade, SG18 9EL Guide Price £875,000
    Warden Road, Ickwell, Biggleswade, SG18 9EL Guide price £875,000 An extended and exceedingly spacious three bedroom detached residence (with planning consent for a fourth bedroom) sitting in a delightful plot of 0.34 of an acre overlooking fields to front and rear. This extended, spacious and partly thatched detached residence offers versatile accommodation which includes on the Ground Floor an entrance hall (approached through oak framed porch with oak front door), three reception rooms (plus an additional office off the garage/store), cloakroom, kitchen and utility room. Additionally a conservatory is located off the dining room and separated therefrom by oak framed and glazed sliding/folding doors that "disappear" into wall cavities at the sides thus opening up a total entertainment space some 40 feet long. The First Floor accommodates a landing, master bedroom with ensuite shower room, two further bedrooms (planning permission granted for a fourth bedroom) and a family bathroom. Externally the property overlooks parkland with mature trees etc to the front and with the rear garden facing south and overlooking paddocks and woodland. The plot extends to about a third of an acre. A generous gravelled driveway offers parking and gives approach to the garage/store. Planning consent exists for an additional double garage. A pedestrian side gate gives access to the rear garden with a natural stone patio area to the rear of the house and accessing the conservatory. The garden was landscaped by Graham Pavey some 15 years ago and is laid primarily to perennial shrubs and roses for ease of maintenance with sweeping lawn leading to a small circular terrace area for the last of the evening sun.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Technical Report
    Making Meaningful Connections Consultation Technical Report East West Rail Consultation: 31 March – 9 June 2021 This document contains the full Consultation Technical Report, without the Appendices. To access the Appendices, please visit www.eastwestrail.co.uk 01. Introduction 18 - 26 07. Project Section B: Bletchley and the Marston Vale Line 100 - 229 1.1. Chapter Summary 18 7.1. Chapter Summary 101 1.2. East West Rail 19 7.2. Introduction 104 1.3. The Project 19 7.3. Service Concepts 109 1.4. Consultation 23 7.4. Bletchley Station 141 1.5. Technical Report 26 7.5. Fenny Stratford Additional Track 144 02. The Case for East West Rail 27 - 31 7.6. Level Crossings on the Marston Vale Line 146 2.1. Chapter Summary 27 7.7. Marston Vale Line Infrastructure Upgrade 228 2.2. The overall case for East West Rail 28 08. Project Section C: Bedford 230 - 299 2.3. Benefits of railways over road improvements 31 8.1. Chapter Summary 230 03. Project Objectives 32 - 42 8.2. Introduction 234 3.1. Chapter Summary 32 8.3. Bedford St Johns 238 3.2. Introduction 33 8.4. Bedford Station 250 3.3. Safety 34 8.5. North Bedford 268 3.4. Environment 34 8.6. Conclusion 297 3.5. EWR Services 34 09. Project Section D: Clapham Green to The Eversdens 300 - 371 3.6. Connectivity 36 9.1. Chapter Summary 301 3.7. Customer Experience and Stations 37 9.2. Introduction 303 3.8. Powering EWR Services 38 9.3. Option Development 306 3.9.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedfordshire and Its Boundaries with Buckinghamshire and Cambridge- Shire
    CoPV ort No. 566 B evtew_oiJNpn-Metropol itan Counties COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHR AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH : BUCKINGHAMSH R t AND CAMBRIDGESHIR LOCAL GOVERNlfEST BOUNDARY COMMISSION f'OIt ENGLAND REPORT NO. LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND CHAIRMAN Mr G J Ellerton CMC MBE DEPUTY CHAIRMAN Mr J G Powell CBE PRICS FSVA Members Professor G E Cherry BA FRTPI PRICE Mr K F J Ennals CB Mr G R Prentice Mrs H R V Sarkany Mr B Scholes OBE THE RT HON NICHOLAS RIDLEY MP SECRETARY OF STATE FOR THE ENVIRONMENT REVIEW OF NON METROPOLITAN COUNTIES THE COUNTY OF BEDFORDSHIRE AND ITS BOUNDARIES WITH BUCKINGHAMSHIRE AND CAMBRIDGE- SHIRE COMMISSION'S FINAL REPORT AND PROPOSALS INTRODUCTION 1. On 26 July 1985 we wrote to Bedfordshire County Council announcing our intention to undertake a review of the County under section 48{1) of the Local Government Act 1972. Copies of the letter were sent to the principal local authorities, and parishes, in Bedfordshire and in the surrounding counties of Buckinghamshire, Cambridgeshire, Hertfordshire and Northamptonshire; to the National and County Associations of Local Councils; to the Members of Parliament with constituency interests and to the headquarters of the main political parties. In addition, copies were sent to those government departments, regional health authorities, water authorities, and electricity and gas boards which might have an interest, as well as to British Telecom, the English Tourist Board, the local government press and to local television and radio stations serving the area. 2. The County Councils were requested, in co-operation as necessary with the other local authorities, to assist us in publicising the start of the review by inserting a notice for two successive weeks in local newspapers so as to give a wide coverage in the areas concerned.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex G – Forming & Delivering a Strategy
    Swindon and Wiltshire Rail Study 09/05/2019 Reference number 107523 ANNEX G – FORMING & DELIVERING A STRATEGY SWINDON AND WILTSHIRE RAIL STUDY ANNEX G – FORMING & DELIVERING A STRATEGY IDENTIFICATION TABLE Client/Project owner Swindon and Wiltshire Local Enterprise Partnership Project Swindon and Wiltshire Rail Study Study Annex G – Forming & Delivering a Strategy Type of document Report Date 09/05/2019 File name Framework N/A Reference number 107523 Number of pages 33 APPROVAL Version Name Position Date Modifications Author J Jackson Associate 12/03/2019 Checked A Sykes Associate 13/03/2019 1 by Approved D Bishop Director 15/03/2019 by Author J Jackson Associate 09/05/2019 Checked A Sykes Associate 09/05/2019 2 by Approved A Sykes Associate 09/05/2019 by TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 2. IDENTIFYING THE COMPONENTS OF THE STRATEGY 7 3. NETWORK-WIDE INITIATIVES 8 4. GREAT WESTERN MAINLINE 11 RECOMMENDATIONS 11 PHASE 0: 1 TPH WESTBURY – SWINDON 12 PHASE 1: 1 TPH SOUTHAMPTON CENTRAL – SWINDON 13 PHASE 2 & 2A: GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 14 PHASE 3: EXTENSION OF GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 16 DELIVERY OF GREAT WESTERN CONNECT 16 THE SOUTH COTSWOLDS LINE 17 5. BERKS & HANTS ROUTE 18 EXTENSION OF LONDON – BEDWYN SERVICES 18 DEVIZES PARKWAY 19 EXTENSION OF LONDON – WESTBURY SERVICES TO BRISTOL (PEAK ONLY) 19 ENHANCEMENT OF PADDINGTON – EXETER SERVICES TO HOURLY 19 DELIVERING AND ENHANCED BERKS & HANTS SERVICE 19 6. WEST OF ENGLAND LINE 21 SALISBURY – LONDON JOURNEY TIME REDUCTIONS 21 PORTON STATION 22 WILTON STATION 23 ANDOVER – LUDGERSHALL LINE 23 7. TRANS WILTS CORRIDOR 24 ASHTON PARK STATION 25 THE IMPACT OF METRO WEST 25 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Ickwell, Bedfordshire
    Ickwell, Bedfordshire A Grade II listed four/five bedroom detached cottage approached by a private, gravelled road and occupying a prominent position with views over Ickwell village green and maypole. · The property dates from the 17th century and was originally two Grade II listed detached property Shyre Cottage timber framed cottages. It was sympathetically converted into a · Four/five bedrooms; one en suite · Two/three reception rooms 10-11 The Green, Ickwell, single dwelling in the late 1980s by the current owners who were careful to retain its many character features including exposed · Kitchen/breakfast room and utility room Bedfordshire, SG18 9EF timbers and beams and inglenook fireplaces. The amalgamation · LPG fired heating of the two cottages provides 2,118 sq. ft. of versatile · Established well maintained gardens with open views accommodation over two floors. Full planning consent has also · Detached oak framed home office/summerhouse · Planning permission granted for two storey extension 4/5 bedrooms been granted for a single storey extension to the rear and for the construction of a detached oak framed carport with a first floor and car port 2/3 reception rooms room over. (Further details relating to this can be provided upon request). Additional Information 3 bathrooms · Mains water, Electricity · The Local Authority is Central Bedfordshire Council EPC Exempt There are two gated entrances and parking for up to six cars. The · The property is in council tax band G front garden is lawned and has curved well stocked borders with established rose bushes and a wisteria. Principal Reception Rooms The sitting/dining room has exposed floor to ceiling timbers partitioning the two sections of the room.
    [Show full text]
  • Northill Questions Online
    Northill Neighbourhood Plan Survey Results A survey was put together to gather the views of the residents in Northill Parish reagrding the Neighbourhood Plan. A paper and online survey were created. The paper survey was hand delievered by the Parish Council to all households in Northil in October 2015. The survey was open from 26th October 2015 to 11th January 2016. 419 responses were received, which was made up of 312 paper and 117 online responses. Where percentages do not add up to 100 it is due to rounding or where multiple responses were permitted. Below is a report of the findings from the survey. Has another member of your household completed this questionnaire online or via paper? (please tick one box only) Yes (22) 5% No (397) 95% How many new homes do you think should be built in the Parish in the next 15 years? (please tick one box only) 1-20 homes (110) 27% 21-40 homes (119) 29% 41-60 homes (63) 15% 61-80 homes (29) 7% 81-100 homes (29) More 7% than 100 homes (17) 4% None (41) 10% If housing is needed, where would you like to see the new homes built? (please tick all that apply) Within existing village/hamlet boundaries (218) 61% Adjacent to existing village/hamlet boundaries (160) 45% Between existing houses (ribbon/linear development) without joining settlements (118) 33% Small developments in the surrounding countryside (77) 22% None of the above/ Don't know (10) 3% If additional housing were to be developed in the Parish, what is acceptable to you? (please tick all that apply) In a number of smaller developments (245) 67% Spread equally across all the settlements of the Parish (207) 56% Converting existing buildings (167) 46% Extensions to existing housing (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk County Council
    Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 GVA Grimley Ltd 10 Stratton Street London W1J 8JR 0870 900 8990 www.gvagrimley.co.uk This report is designed to be printed double sided. Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review Final Report May 2009 Reference: P:\PLANNING\621\Instruction\Clients\Suffolk County Council\Western Suffolk ELR\10.0 Reports\Final Report\Final\WesternSuffolkELRFinalReport090506.doc Contact: Michael Dall Tel: 020 7911 2127 Email: [email protected] www.gvagrimley.co.uk Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................... 1 2. POLICY CONTEXT....................................................................................................... 5 3. COMMERCIAL PROPERTY MARKET ANALYSIS.................................................... 24 4. EMPLOYMENT LAND SUPPLY ANALYSIS.............................................................. 78 5. EMPLOYMENT FLOORSPACE PROJECTIONS..................................................... 107 6. BALANCING DEMAND AND SUPPLY .................................................................... 147 7. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS......................................................... 151 Suffolk County Council Western Suffolk Employment Land Review LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 The Western Suffolk Study Area 5 Figure 2 Claydon Business Park, Claydon 26 Figure 3 Industrial Use in
    [Show full text]
  • Aroma House, 55 Harlton Road, Little Eversden
    Aroma House, 55 Harlton Road, Little Eversden Aroma House, 55 Harlton Road, Little Eversden, Cambridgeshire, CB23 1HD An extended Victorian house with delightful established gardens of just under half an acre, with potential development opportunity, in this small, highly regarded south west Cambridgeshire village. Cambridge 7 miles, Royston (fast train to King's Cross) 9 miles, M11 (junction 12) 5 miles, (distances are approximate). Gross internal floor area 1,945 sq.ft (181 sq.m) plus Studio Annexe 23'1 x 12'5 (7.04m x 3.78m) Ground Floor: Reception Hall, Cloakroom, Study, Sitting Room, Dining Room, Breakfast Room, Kitchen, Utility Room. First Floor: 4 Bedrooms, 2 Bathrooms (1 En Suite). Stonecross Trumpington High Street Outside: Off Street Parking, Workshop/Store, Wonderful Mature Gardens, Studio/Annexe with Sitting Cambridge Room, Shower Room and Mezzanine Sleeping Platform. CB2 9SU t: 01223 841842 In all about half an acre. e: [email protected] f: 01223 840721 bidwells.co.uk Please read Important Notice on the last page of text Particulars of Sale Situation Little Eversden is a small, attractive village Particular features of note include: - conveniently situated about 7 miles south west of Cambridge. There is a recreation ground with play Delightful dual aspect Sitting Room with Stylish Kitchen, re-fitted in 2007 with range of area for young children within close proximity, an glazed door to terrace, fireplace with inset matching base and wall cabinet's, granite work Italian restaurant within about half a mile and an wood burning stove and twin archways to surfaces and integrated Neff appliances Indian restaurant and village hall in the neighbouring adjoining Dining Room.
    [Show full text]
  • Arms and the (Tax-)Man: the Use and Taxation of Armorial Bearings in Britain, 1798–1944
    Arms and the (tax-)man: The use and taxation of armorial bearings in Britain, 1798–1944. Philip Daniel Allfrey BA, BSc, MSc(Hons), DPhil. Dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MLitt in Family and Local History at the University of Dundee. October 2016 Abstract From 1798 to 1944 the display of coats of arms in Great Britain was taxed. Since there were major changes to the role of heraldry in society in the same period, it is surprising that the records of the tax have gone unstudied. This dissertation evaluates whether the records of the tax can say something useful about heraldry in this period. The surviving records include information about individual taxpayers, statistics at national and local levels, and administrative papers. To properly interpret these records, it was necessary to develop a detailed understanding of the workings of the tax; the last history of the tax was published in 1885 and did not discuss in detail how the tax was collected. A preliminary analysis of the records of the armorial bearings tax leads to five conclusions: the financial or social elite were more likely to pay the tax; the people who paid the tax were concentrated in fashionable areas; there were differences between the types of people who paid the tax in rural and urban areas; women and clergy were present in greater numbers than one might expect; and the number of taxpayers grew rapidly in the middle of the nineteenth century, but dropped off after 1914. However, several questions have to be answered before
    [Show full text]