DOCSLIB.ORG

Gipfelfauna-Monitoring Im Nationalpark Gesäuse

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Gipfelfauna-Monitoring Im Nationalpark Gesäuse Gipfelfauna-Monitoring im Nationalpark Gesäuse Monitoring der Gipfelfauna unter besondererBerücksichtigung sensibler, gefährdeter und endemischer Spinnentier- und Insektentaxa Auftraggeber: Nationalpark Gesäuse GmbH Endbericht: Spinnentiere, Insekten & Kleinsäuger Graz, im März 2014 ÖKOTEAM – Institut für Tierökologie und Naturraumplanung Brunner, Holzinger, Komposch, Paill OG Ingenieurbüro für Biologie A - 8010 Graz, Bergmanngasse 22 Tel.: 0316/35 16 50 Fax DW 4 e-mail: [email protected] Gipfelfauna-Monitoring im Nationalpark Gesäuse Monitoring der Gipfelfauna unter besonderer Berücksichtigung sensibler, gefährdeter und endemischer Spinnentier- und Insektentaxa Endbericht 2014 – Spinnentiere, Insekten & Kleinsäuger Vers. 03 Auftraggeber: Fachbearbeitungen: Nationalpark Gesäuse GmbH Mag. Dr. Thomas FRIEß Leitung Fachbereich Naturschutz/Naturraum Mag. Brigitte KOMPOSCH Mag. MSc. Daniel Kreiner Mag. Dr. Christian KOMPOSCH 8913 Weng im Gesäuse 2 Mag. Wolfgang PAILL Determination: Mag. Martin HEPNER Dr. Norbert MILASOWSZKY Technische AssistentInnen: Mag. Brigitte KOMPOSCH Auftragnehmer: Mag. Dr. Christian MAIRHUBER ÖKOTEAM – Mag. Alex PLATZ Institut für Tierökologie und Mag. Laura PAPST Naturraumplanung OG Mag. Heri WAGNER Projektleitung: Lektorat: Mag. Dr. Christian KOMPOSCH Astrid LEITNER Mag. Dr. Thomas FRIEß Zitiervorschlag: ÖKOTEAM (2014): Gipfelfauna-Monitoring im Nationalpark Gesäuse. Monitoring der Gipfelfauna unter besonderer Berücksichtigung sensibler, gefähr- deter und endemischer Spinnentier- und Insektentaxa. – Unveröffentlichter Projektbericht im Auftrag der Nationalpark Gesäuse GmbH, 212 Seiten. Graz, am 31. März 2014 M ONITORING G IPFELFAUNA NP G ESÄUSE 2014 I N H A L T 1 ZUSAMMMENFASSUNG ......................................................................................................... 5 2 AUSGANGSLAGE ................................................................................................................... 12 3 FRAGESTELLUNGEN UND LÖSUNGSANSÄTZE ........................................................... 13 4 UNTERSUCHUNGSGEBIET, - DESIGN UND UNTERLAGEN ....................................... 15 4.1 KURZCHARAKTERISIERUNG DER UNTERSUCHUNGSGEBIETE ........................................... 15 4.2 UNTERSUCHUNGSDESIGN ................................................................................................. 28 4.3 BEREITGESTELLTE UNTERLAGEN .................................................................................... 31 4.4 POSTER GIPFELMONITORING ............................................................................................ 32 5 SEKTORALE FACHBERICHTE ........................................................................................... 33 5.1 SPINNENTIERE (ARACHNIDA): SPINNEN (ARANEAE) UND WEBERKNECHTE (OPILIONES) 33 5.1.1 Datenlage im Nationalpark Gesäuse ....................................................................... 33 5.1.2 Sektorale Methodik und Tiermaterial ....................................................................... 34 5.1.3 Weberknechte als Bioindikatoren ............................................................................. 35 5.1.4 Spinnen als Bioindikatoren ...................................................................................... 35 5.1.5 Statistische Auswertungen ........................................................................................ 36 5.1.6 Arteninventar des Untersuchungsgebietes ............................................................... 38 5.1.7 Steckbriefe bemerkenswerter Endemiten und Subendemiten ................................... 41 5.1.8 Nachweishäufigkeiten der epigäischen Spinnentierfauna ........................................ 58 5.1.9 Verteilung der nachgewiesenen Spinnentiere auf die Untersuchungsgebiete .......... 60 5.1.10 Seehöhe als Faktor für den Endemismus ................................................................. 70 5.1.11 Lebensraumtyp als Faktor für den Endemismus ...................................................... 77 5.1.12 Exposition als Faktor für den Endemismus .............................................................. 82 5.1.13 Ähnlichkeitsanalysen der Weberknecht- und Spinnengemeinschaften ..................... 86 5.1.14 Hinweise zum Gipfelmonitoring (GLORIA-Programm) aus Sicht der Weberknecht- und Spinnenfauna ..................................................................................................................... 90 5.2 LAUFKÄFER (CARABIDAE) ............................................................................................... 92 5.2.1 Zur Erforschung der Laufkäferfauna des Nationalparks Gesäuse ........................... 92 5.2.2 Kommentierte Artenliste ........................................................................................... 92 5.2.3 Die Fauna der einzelnen Gipfeln ........................................................................... 107 5.2.4 Die Gipfelfauna im Überblick ................................................................................ 117 5.2.5 Ökologisch-biologische Befunde zur Gipfelfauna .................................................. 121 5.2.6 Monitoring .............................................................................................................. 132 5.2.7 Schutzmaßnahmen .................................................................................................. 133 5.2.8 Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................. 133 3 M ONITORING G IPFELFAUNA NP G ESÄUSE 2014 5.3 WANZEN (HETEROPTERA) .............................................................................................. 136 5.3.1 Zur Erforschung der Wanzenfauna des Nationalparks Gesäuse ........................... 136 5.3.2 Verzeichnis der nachgewiesenen Arten .................................................................. 138 5.3.3 Diskussion der Funde ............................................................................................. 141 5.3.4 Folgerungen ........................................................................................................... 144 5.3.5 Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................. 150 5.4 KLEINSÄUGER (MAMMALIA PARTIM) ............................................................................ 152 5.4.1 Zur Erforschung der Kleinsäugerfauna des Nationalparks Gesäuse ..................... 152 5.4.2 Vorläufiges Verzeichnis der nachgewiesenen Arten .............................................. 152 5.4.3 Diskussion der Funde ............................................................................................. 152 5.4.4 Folgerungen ........................................................................................................... 154 5.4.5 Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................. 154 6 LITERATUR ........................................................................................................................... 155 6.1 ALLGEMEINE TEILE ........................................................................................................ 155 6.2 SPINNEN UND WEBERKNECHTE ...................................................................................... 155 6.3 LAUFKÄFER .................................................................................................................... 157 6.4 WANZEN ......................................................................................................................... 158 6.5 KLEINSÄUGER ................................................................................................................ 160 7 BARBERFALLENSTANDORTE ......................................................................................... 161 7.1 BUCHSTEIN ..................................................................................................................... 161 7.2 LUGAUER ........................................................................................................................ 162 7.3 HOCHZINÖDL .................................................................................................................. 165 7.4 STADELFELDSCHNEID UND ROTOFEN ............................................................................ 167 8 FALLENCODIERUNG .......................................................................................................... 168 9 ROHDATEN ............................................................................................................................ 174 10 FOTODOKUMENTATION .................................................................................................. 179 10.1 BUCHSTEIN ..................................................................................................................... 179 10.2 LUGAUER ........................................................................................................................ 186 10.3 HOCHZINÖDL .................................................................................................................. 193 10.4 STADELFELDSCHNEID UND ROTOFEN ............................................................................ 205 4 M ONITORING G IPFELFAUNA NP G ESÄUSE 2014 1 ZUSAMMMENFASSUNG Projektziele Das zoologisches Programm zur Überwachung der Gipfelfauna (mit dem Schwerpunkt Spinnentie- re und Insekten) wurde begleitend zu einem vegetationskundlichen
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spiders (Araneae) of Stony Debris in North Bohemia
    Arachnol. Mitt. 12:46-56 Basel, Dezember 1996 Spiders (Araneae) of stony debris in North Bohemia o v v Vlastimil RUZICKA & Jaromfr HAJER Abstract: The arachnofauna was studied at five stony debris sites in northern Bohemia. In Central Europe, the northern and montane species inhabiting cold places live not only on mountain tops and peat bogs but also on the lower edges of boulder debris, where air streaming through the system of inner compartments gives rise to an exceedingly cold microclimate. At such cold sites, spiders can live either on bare stones (Bathyphantes simillimus, Wubanoides ura/ensis), or in the rich layers of moss and lichen (Dip/oeentria bidentata). Kratoehviliella bieapitata exhibits a diplostenoecious occurrence in stony debris and on tree bark. Latithorax faustus and Theonoe minutissima display diplostenoecious occurrence in stony debris and on peat bogs. The occurrence of the species Seotina eelans in the Czech Republic was documented for the first time. Key words: Spiders, stony debris, microclimate, geographic distribution. INTRODUCTION Stony debris constitute, in Central Europe, island ecosystems which have remained virtually intact over the entire Holocene. Due to the unfeasibility of utilization, stony debris areas are among the few ecosystems that have only minimally been affected by man. In bulky accumulations, air can flow through the system of internal spaces. In this way, cold air can accumulate in the lower part of the tal us, so that ice can form and persist there until late spring. This phenomenon, well known from the Alp region (FURRER 1966), occurs widely in North Bohemia (KUBAT 1971). Owing to the specific substrate and microclimate, stony debris areas are inhabited by specific plant (SADLO & KOLBEK 1994) and animal communities, contributing thus o v v significantly to the biodiversity of the landscape (RUZICKA 1993a).
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape-Scale Connections Between the Land Use, Habitat Quality and Ecosystem Goods and Services in the Mureş/Maros Valley
    TISCIA monograph series Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley Edited by László Körmöczi Szeged-Arad 2012 Two countries, one goal, joint success! Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley TISCIA monograph series 1. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Maros/Mureş River Valley. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1995. 2. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Criş/Körös Rivers’ Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1997. 3. A. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): The Someş/Szamos River Valleys. A Study of the Geography, Hydrobiology and Ecology of the River and its Environment, 1999. 4. J. Hamar and A. Sárkány-Kiss (eds.): The Upper Tisa Valley. Preparatory Proposal for Ramsar Site Designation and an Ecological Background, 1999. 5. L. Gallé and L. Körmöczi (eds.): Ecology of River Valleys, 2000. 6. Sárkány-Kiss and J. Hamar (eds.): Ecological Aspects of the Tisa River Basin, 2002. 7. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, I. 2005. 8. L. Gallé (ed.): Vegetation and Fauna of Tisza River Basin, II. 2008. 9. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Ecological and socio-economic relations in the valleys of river Körös/Criş and river Maros/Mureş, 2011. 10. L. Körmöczi (ed.): Landscape-scale connections between the land use, habitat quality and ecosystem goods and services in the Mureş/Maros valley, 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • The Study of Hidden Habitats Sheds Light on Poorly Known Taxa: Spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 841: 39–59 (2019)The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa... 39 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.841.33271 RESEARCH ARTICLE http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa: spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum Enrique Ledesma1, Alberto Jiménez-Valverde1, Alberto de Castro2, Pablo Aguado-Aranda1, Vicente M. Ortuño1 1 Research Team on Soil Biology and Subterranean Ecosystems, Department of Life Science, Faculty of Science, University of Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain 2 Entomology Department, Aranzadi Science Society, Donostia - San Sebastián, Gipuzkoa, Spain Corresponding author: Enrique Ledesma ([email protected]); Alberto Jiménez-Valverde ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Michalik | Received 22 January 2019 | Accepted 5 March 2019 | Published 23 April 2019 http://zoobank.org/52EA570E-CA40-453D-A921-7785A9BD188B Citation: Ledesma E, Jiménez-Valverde A, de Castro A, Aguado-Aranda P, Ortuño VM (2019) The study of hidden habitats sheds light on poorly known taxa: spiders of the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum. ZooKeys 841: 39–59. https:// doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.841.33271 Abstract The scarce and biased knowledge about the diversity and distribution of Araneae species in the Iberian Peninsula is accentuated in poorly known habitats such as the Mesovoid Shallow Substratum (MSS). The aim of this study was to characterize the spiders inventory of the colluvial MSS of the Sierra de Guadar- rama National Park, and to assess the importance of this habitat for the conservation of the taxon. Thirty-three localities were selected across the high peaks of the Guadarrama mountain range and they were sampled for a year using subterranean traps specially designed to capture arthropods in the MSS.
    [Show full text]
  • Goldbachs- Und Ziebachsrück – Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 1 Dorow, W
    Natwres-11-2.1:Layout 1 13.11.08 15:18 Seite 1 HESSEN Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, HESSEN ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz www.hmulv.hessen.de Naturwaldreservate in Hessen GOLDBACHS-GOLDBACHS- UNDUND ZIEBACHSRÜCKZIEBACHSRÜCK ZOOLOGISCHEZOOLOGISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGENUNTERSUCHUNGEN Naturwaldreservate in Hessen Naturwaldreservate Goldbachs- und Ziebachsrück – Zoologische Untersuchungen NO OO 11/2.1 NN 11/2.111/2.1 Naturwaldreservate in Hessen 11/2.1 Goldbachs- und Ziebachsrück Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 1 Wolfgang H. O. Dorow Theo Blick Jens-Peter Kopelke mit Beiträgen von Beate Löb, Sabine Kiefer & Michael Hoffmann (Aves) Jörg Römbke (Lumbricidae) Petra M. T. Zub (Lepidoptera) Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 45 2009 Impressum Herausgeber: Hessisches Ministerium für Umwelt, Energie, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz Mainzer Str. 80 65189 Wiesbaden Landesbetrieb Hessen-Forst Bertha-von-Suttner-Str. 3 34131 Kassel Nordwestdeutsche Forstliche Versuchsanstalt Grätzelstr. 2 37079 Göttingen http://www.nw-fva.de Dieser Band wurde in wissenschaftlicher Kooperation mit dem Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg erstellt. http://www.senckenberg.de – Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung, Band 45 – Titelfoto: Die häufige Krabbenspinne Diaea dorsata (FABRICIUS, 1777) lebt bevorzugt an Stämmen und auf Ästen von Laubbäumen. (Foto: Jürgen Fischer, Wunsiedel) Layout: Eva Feltkamp, 60486 Frankfurt Druck: Elektra Reprographischer Betrieb GmbH, 65527 Niedernhausen Umschlaggestaltung: studio zerzawy agd, 65329 Hohenstein Wiesbaden, April 2009 ISBN 978-3-89274-285-2 ISSN 0341-3845 Zitiervorschlag: DOROW, W. H. O.; BLICK, T. & KOPELKE, J.-P. 2009. Naturwaldreservate in Hessen. Band 11/2.1. Goldbachs- und Ziebachsrück. Zoologische Untersuchungen 1994-1996, Teil 1. Mitteilungen der Hessischen Landesforstverwaltung 45: 1-326. Inhaltsverzeichnis Band 11/2.1 DOROW, W.
    [Show full text]
  • Laufkäfer, Kurzflügelkäfer, Asseln, Webespinnen
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Entomofauna Suppl. Jahr/Year: 1982 Band/Volume: S1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Löser Siegfried, Thaler Konrad, Meyer Erwin Artikel/Article: Laufkäfer, Kurzflügelkäfer, Asseln, Webespinnen, Weberknechte und Tausendfüßler des Naturschutzgebietes "Murnauer Moos" und der angrenzenden westlichen Talhänge (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylinidae; Crustacea: Isopoda; Aranei: Opiliones; Diplopoda) 369-446 © Entomofauna Ansfelden/Austria, download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Entomofauna Supplement 1 Linz, 1.August 1982 Laufkäfer, Kurzflügelkäfer, Asseln, Webespinnen, Weberknechte und Tausendfüßer des Naturschutzgebietes "Murnauer Moos" und der angrenzenden westlichen Talhänge (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Staphylinidae; Crustacea: Iso- poda; Aranei; Opiliones; Diplopoda) S. Löser, E. Meyer, K. Thaler 1. Einleitung Auf der Suche nach einer Untersuchungsfläche im süd- deutschen Raum, die geeignet sein sollte, kleinräumig vergleichende ökologische Untersuchungen an Wirbellosen der Bodenoberfläche durchzuführen, wurde das "Murnauer Moos" als hervorragend dafür befunden. Dieses Gebiet ist in seiner Vielfalt und Ursprünglichkeit einmalig. Zum einen ist die ganze Vielfalt der Moortypen des Alpenran- des in optimalen Beispielen vertreten, zum anderen sind die geschlossenen Pflanzengesellschaften (.Fichtenmoor- wald, Erlenbruchwälder, Edellaubwälder auf den Quarzit- köcheln u.a.) zum Teil unberührt oder sehr naturnah er- halten
    [Show full text]
  • Annotated Checklist of the Spiders of Turkey
    _____________Mun. Ent. Zool. Vol. 12, No. 2, June 2017__________ 433 ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE SPIDERS OF TURKEY Hakan Demir* and Osman Seyyar* * Niğde University, Faculty of Science and Arts, Department of Biology, TR–51100 Niğde, TURKEY. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected] [Demir, H. & Seyyar, O. 2017. Annotated checklist of the spiders of Turkey. Munis Entomology & Zoology, 12 (2): 433-469] ABSTRACT: The list provides an annotated checklist of all the spiders from Turkey. A total of 1117 spider species and two subspecies belonging to 52 families have been reported. The list is dominated by members of the families Gnaphosidae (145 species), Salticidae (143 species) and Linyphiidae (128 species) respectively. KEY WORDS: Araneae, Checklist, Turkey, Fauna To date, Turkish researches have been published three checklist of spiders in the country. The first checklist was compiled by Karol (1967) and contains 302 spider species. The second checklist was prepared by Bayram (2002). He revised Karol’s (1967) checklist and reported 520 species from Turkey. Latest checklist of Turkish spiders was published by Topçu et al. (2005) and contains 613 spider records. A lot of work have been done in the last decade about Turkish spiders. So, the checklist of Turkish spiders need to be updated. We updated all checklist and prepare a new checklist using all published the available literatures. This list contains 1117 species of spider species and subspecies belonging to 52 families from Turkey (Table 1). This checklist is compile from literature dealing with the Turkish spider fauna. The aim of this study is to determine an update list of spider in Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Redelimitation of the Subfamily Micronetinae HULL, 1920 and the Genus Lepthyphantes MENGE, 1866 with Descriptions of Some New Genera (Aranei, Linyphiidae)
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Berichte des naturwissenschaftlichen-medizinischen Verein Innsbruck Jahr/Year: 1996 Band/Volume: 83 Autor(en)/Author(s): Saaristo Michael Ilmari, Tanasevitch Andrei V. Artikel/Article: Redelimitation of the Subfamily Micronetinae Hull, 1920 and the Genus Lepthyphantes Menge, 1866 with Description of Some New Genera (Aranei, Linyphiidae). 163-186 © Naturwiss.-med. Ver. Innsbruck; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ber. nat.-med. Verein Innsbruck Band 83 S. 163 - 186 Innsbruck, Okt. 1996 Redelimitation of the Subfamily Micronetinae HULL, 1920 and the Genus Lepthyphantes MENGE, 1866 with Descriptions of Some New Genera (Aranei, Linyphiidae) by Michael I. SAARISTO & Andrei V. TANASEVTTCH *) Synopsis: The subfamily Micronetinae HULL, 1920 and the genus Lepthyphantes MEN- GE, 1866 are redelimited with special reference to the secondary genital organs. The genus Lepthyphantes has been limited to five species only. The following eight new genera have been created for 89 of the remaining spe- cies of the former Lepthyphantes: Irnprophantes n. gen. (type-species Lepthyphantes improbulus SIMON, 1929), Mansuphantes n.gen. (type-species Linyphìa mansueta THORELL, 1875), Piniphantes n.gen. (type- species Lepthyphantespinicola SIMON, 1884), Tenuiphantes n.gen. (type-species Linyphia tenuis BLACK- WALL, 1852), Anguliphantes n.gen. (type-species Linyphia angulipalpis WESTRING, 1851), Flagelliphan- tes n.gen. (type-species Lepthyphantes flagellifer TANASEVITCH, 1987), Decipiphantes n.gen. (type-spe- cies Linyphia dedpiens L. KOCH, 1879), Formiphantes n.gen. (type-species Taranucnus lephthyphantiformis STRAND, 1907). Three genera, i.e. Oryphantes HULL, 1932 gen.rev. (type-species Linyphia angulata O. PICKARD-CAMBRIDGE, 1881), Bolephthyphantes STRAND, 1901 gen.rev.
    [Show full text]
  • Influence of Stand-Alone Trees on Epigeic Spiders (Araneae) at the Alpine Timberline
    Ann. Zool. Fennici 44: 43–57 ISSN 0003-455X Helsinki 15 March 2007 © Finnish Zoological and Botanical Publishing Board 2007 Influence of stand-alone trees on epigeic spiders (Araneae) at the alpine timberline Holger Frick1,2, Wolfgang Nentwig1 & Christian Kropf2 1) Zoological Institute, University of Bern, Baltzerstrasse 6, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland (e-mails: [email protected], [email protected]) 2) Natural History Museum Bern, Department of Invertebrates, Bernastrasse 15, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland (e-mail: [email protected]) Received 15 Apr. 2006, revised version received 5 Aug. 2006, accepted 9 June 2006 Frick, H., Nentwig, W. & Kropf, C. 2007: Influence of stand-alone trees on epigeic spiders (Ara- neae) at the alpine timberline. — Ann. Zool. Fennici 44: 43–57. We studied community composition and activity densities of spiders around stand- alone Norway spruce at the alpine timberline with respect to three interrelated param- eters: (1) relative distance from tree trunk, (2) branch-, and (3) vegetation cover. Pitfall traps were positioned in an inner distance range (close to tree trunk), a median, and an outer distance range (at the outer limit of branch cover). Community composition: Linyphiid species numbers increased significantly towards the tree trunks where the branch cover was high, whereas lycosid and gnaphosid species numbers increased towards the edge where branch cover was low. Activity densities: 11 out of 14 species were significantly correlated with the relative distance to the tree trunk, ten with the branch cover, and two with vegetation cover. Open-land species preferred the outer distance range and forest species the inner distance range.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnida: Araneae
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS AGRICULTURAE ET SILVICULTURAE MENDELIANAE BRUNENSIS Volume 63 84 Number 3, 2015 http://dx.doi.org/10.11118/actaun201563030751 SPIDERS (ARACHNIDA: ARANEAE) FROM FOREST ECOSYSTEMS OF TŘESÍN NATIONAL NATURE MONUMENT (LITOVELSKÉ POMORAVÍ, CZECH REPUBLIC) WITH SUGGESTIONS TO CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT OF THE LOCALITY Ondřej Košulič1 1 Department of Forest Protection and Wildlife Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic Abstract KOŠULIČ ONDŘEJ. 2015. Spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) from Forest Ecosystems of Třesín National Nature Monument (Litovelské Pomoraví, Czech Republic) with Suggestions to Conservation Management of the Locality. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 63(3): 751–767. This paper presents faunistic records of spiders in the forest ecosystems of the Třesín National Nature Monument. Spiders were surveyed from 29 April 2013 to 25 October 2013. A total of 1012 individual spiders were collected from eight sites by pitfall traps, individual collection, sweeping grasses and herb vegetation, beating shrubs and trees, and shi ing leaf litters. Spiders were identifi ed as 146 species from 94 genera and 27 families. The families Linyphiidae, Lycosidae, Gnaphosidae, and Thomisidae exhibited high species diversity. Three species listed on the Red List of Threatened Species in the Czech Republic were recorded: Dysdera moravica (Řezáč, Gasparo, Král & Heneberg, 2014), Megalepthyphantes pseudocollinus (Saaristo, 1997), and Nusoncus nasutus (Schenkel, 1925). The fi nding of N. nasutus is among the fi rst reports of this spider in the Moravia region. Several fi ndings represent the northernmost occurrences of rare thermophilous spiders in Moravia and even the Czech Republic. The great richness of araneofauna and the occurrence of rare and poorly known spider species confi rm the high biotic value of Třesín within the agriculturally intensifi ed landscape of Moravia.
    [Show full text]
  • Ökologische Untersuchungen Epigäische Spinnenfauna Hecken
    ÖKOLOGISCH-FAUNISTISCHE UNTERSUCHUNGEN AN DER EPIGÄISCHEN SPINNENFAUNA (ARANEAE) OBERFRÄNKISCHER HECKEN DIPLOMARBEIT Im Fachbereich Biologie, Chemie und Geowissenschaften Lehrstuhl Tierökologie I (Prof. Dr. H. Zwölfer) Universität Bayreuth vorgelegt von Theo Blick Bayreuth, September 1988 meiner Familie Carapax des Männchens von Panamomps sulcifrons (Erigoninae) (100-fach, aus WIEHLE, 1960, S. 224, Fig. 402) INHALT Seite 1. EINLEITUNG ..........................................................................................................................................1 2. UNTERSUCHUNGSGEBIETE .............................................................................................................2 3. METHODIK ............................................................................................................................................7 3.1. Bodenfallenfang ...........................................................................................................................7 3.2. Extraktion von Streu- und Bodenproben ....................................................................................9 3.3. Statistische Methoden ..................................................................................................................9 3.4. Bestimmung der Spinnen .......................................................................................................... 10 4. ERGEBNISSE .....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Red List of Czech Spiders: 3Rd Edition, Adjusted According to Evidence-Based National Conservation Priorities
    Biologia 70/5: 645—666, 2015 Section Zoology DOI: 10.1515/biolog-2015-0079 Red List of Czech spiders: 3rd edition, adjusted according to evidence-based national conservation priorities Milan Řezáč1*, Antonín Kůrka2, Vlastimil Růžička3 &PetrHeneberg4* 1Crop Research Institute, Biodiversity Lab, Drnovská 507,CZ-161 06 Prague, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] 217. listopadu 1173,CZ-293 02 Mladá Boleslav, Czech Republic 3Institute of Entomology, Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Branišovská 31,CZ-370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic 4Charles University in Prague, Third Faculty of Medicine, Ruská 87,CZ-100 00 Prague, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: The knowledge on spiders of the Czech Republic has substantially improved since the second version of the national Red List was published, mainly due to large-scale field records and the establishment of an extensive, searchable electronic database of both retrospective and prospective records. Meanwhile, Central European spiders have undergone substantial changes in abundance and distribution. In this report, an updated Red List is presented and compared with the previous editions from 1992 and 2002, assessing all 879 spider species known to occur in the Czech Republic. For the first time, the abundance, area of occupancy and population trends were calculated for each of the species using the data from the Czech Arachnological Society recording scheme. Twenty-seven species (3% of the total) were classified as Regionally Extinct (RE), 92 (10%) as Critically Endangered, 115 (13%) as Endangered, 155 (18%) as Vulnerable, and 121 (14%) were classified as Least Concern species.
    [Show full text]
  • Gredleriana 9
    Inhaltsverzeichnis / Indice GEORG NIEDRIST, ERICH TASSER , CHRISTIAN LÜTH , JOSEF DALLA VIA & ULRIKE TAPPEINE r: Botanisch-ökologische Untersuchungen des Wirtschaftsgrünlandes in Südtirol unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Bergmähder . .11 9 HANSPETER STAFFLER , GERHARD KARRER : Umwandlung der Vinschgauer Gredleriana Schwarzföhrenforste in naturnahe Bestände (Südtirol / Italien) . 33 PETER ENGLMAIER : Die Ansaat borstblättriger Schwingelarten (Festuca spp.): Naturnahe Begrünung oder Florenverfälschung? . 61 BRUNO WALLNÖFER & THOMAS WILHALM : Zur Verbreitung von acht seltenen Carex-Arten (Cyperaceae) in Südtirol . 83 CHRISTIAN ZIDORN : Ranunculus parnassifolius L. subsp. heterocarpus Küpfer. Wiederfund für Osttirol und weitere bemerkenswerte Funde – Floristische Notizen aus Osttirol 4 . 97 THOMAS WILHALM , REINHOLD BECK , EDITH SCHNEIDER -FÜRCHAU & WILHELM TRATTER : Ergänzungen und Korrekturen zum Katalog der Gefäßp anzen Südtirols (3) . 105 ELKE ZIPPEL & THOMAS WILHALM : Origin and relationships of Astragalus vesicarius subsp. pastellianus (Fabaceae) from the Vinschgau Valley (Val Venosta, Italy) . 119 YVONNE KISS & TIMO KOPF : Die Vertigo-Arten (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Vertiginidae) 9 des Anhang 2 der FFH-Richtlinie in Südtirol – eine Pilotstudie . 135 BARBARA M. FISCHER , KRISTIAN PFALLER & HEINRICH SCHATZ : Die Hornmilbenfamilie Quadroppiidae BALOGH , 1983 (Acari: Oribatida) im Schlerngebiet (Südtirol, Italien) . 171 SIMONE BALLINI : Arborikole und epigäische Spinnen (Arachnida: Araneae) in Laubmischwäldern bei Lana und Burgstall
    [Show full text]