DOCSLIB.ORG

National Committee on U.S.-China Relations

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Committee on U.S.-China Relations NATIO N AL COMMITTEE O N U N I T E D S T A T E S ~ C H I N A R E L A T I O ns 2004-05 Annual Report NATIO N AL COMMITTEE O N U N I T E D S T A T E S -CHI N A R E L A T I O ns 71 West 23rd Street, 19th Floor, New York, NY 10010-4102 / www.ncuscr.org B O A R D O F D IRECTOR S November 2003 – November 2004 CHAI R Michael H. Armacost Barbara H. Franklin Richard H. Matzke Carla A. Hills Dennis Blair William E. Frenzel D. Bruce McMahan Julia Chang Bloch Peter F. Geithner Robert S. McNamara VI C E C H A I R ME N Ray Bracy David R. Gergen Douglas P. Murray William M. Daley Mary Brown Bullock Bates Gill Kevin J. O’Brien Maurice R. Greenberg Thomas J. Christensen Thomas M. Gorrie Thomas R. Pickering Lee H. Hamilton Edward T. Cloonan Harry Harding Joseph W. Prueher William R. Rhodes Jerome A. Cohen Jamie P. Horsley Henry P. Sailer J. Stapleton Roy Ken W. Cole John Thomas Kamm Matt Salmon James R. Sasser Charles J. Conroy Virginia Kamsky Nicholas V. Scheele Ralph A. Cossa Thomas H. Kean James R. Schlesinger Tr EA sur E R Douglas N. Daft Henry A. Kissinger David K. Y. Tang Herbert J. Hansell Gary Dirks Nicholas R. Lardy Nancy Bernkopf Tucker Martin S. Feldstein Terrill E. Lautz I. Peter Wolff SE cr ETA R Y Gerald R. Ford Robert A. Levinson Madeleine Zelin Kathryn D. Christopherson John H. Foster Kenneth Lieberthal November 2004 – November 2005 CHAI R Michael H. Armacost Louis V. Gerstner, Jr. Robert S. McNamara Carla A. Hills Dennis Blair Bates Gill Kevin J. O’Brien Ray Bracy Thomas M. Gorrie Thomas R. Pickering VI C E C H A I R ME N Mary Brown Bullock Harry Harding Joseph W. Prueher William M. Daley Thomas J. Christensen Jamie P. Horsley Henry P. Sailer Maurice R. Greenberg Edward T. Cloonan David A. Jones, Jr. Matt Salmon Lee H. Hamilton Ken W. Cole John Thomas Kamm Nicholas V. Scheele Nicholas R. Lardy Ralph A. Cossa Virginia Kamsky James R. Schlesinger William R. Rhodes Lorne W. Craner Thomas H. Kean David K. Y. Tang J. Stapleton Roy Michael L. Ducker Henry A. Kissinger John L. Thornton James R. Sasser Martin S. Feldstein Geraldine S. Kunstadter Nancy Bernkopf Tucker Gerald R. Ford David M. Lampton I. Peter Wolff Tr EA sur E R John H. Foster Terrill E. Lautz Herbert J. Hansell Barbara H. Franklin Robert A. Levinson William E. Frenzel Kenneth Lieberthal SE cr ETA R Y Peter F. Geithner David R. Malpass Kathryn D. Christopherson David R. Gergen D. Bruce McMahan NATIO N AL COMMITTEE O N U N I T E D S T A T E S - C H I N A R E L A T I O ns The National Committee on United States-China Relations is a nonprofit educational organization that encourages understanding of China and the United States among citizens of both countries. The Committee focuses its exchange, educational and policy activities on politics and security, education, governance and civil society, economic cooperation, media and transnational issues, addressing these issues with respect to the People’s Republic, Hong Kong SAR and Taiwan. The Committee’s programs draw strength from its members, who now number more than 700 Americans from all parts of the country and about 70 corporations and professional firms. They represent many viewpoints, but share the belief that productive U.S.-China relations require ongoing public education, face-to- face contact and forthright exchange of ideas. L E T T E R F RO M T H E Ch A I R & P R E S IDE N T eputy Secretary of State Robert of ways in which the Sino-American rela- B. Zoellick’s speech at our 2005 tionship has expanded since our founding D Gala marked a new milestone in four decades ago. Yet despite the dramatic U.S.-China relations. He outlined a vision changes and growth in the relationship, there for the relationship based on “cooperation is still much we can learn from one another. as stakeholders…within a larger framework The National Committee remains commit- where the parties recognize a shared interest ted to the belief that education is the path to in sustaining political, economic and security improved relations and new opportunities. systems that provide common benefits.” Today, our focus is on four critical areas of The officers, directors, members and cross-cultural education: supporters of the National Committee on • Programs to educate the general public in U.S.-China Relations share that vision. an effort to foster mutual understanding, We want to foster the spirit of coopera- eliminate misconceptions and promote tion. We want to find common ground. We greater interest in future cooperation. want to help develop and support policies • Exchange programs to give more people that will benefit the people of our two na- the opportunity to experience another tions. And we want to create new programs culture firsthand and bring this experi- that will strengthen and enrich the bilateral ence back home to share with others. relationship. • Efforts to provide our government leaders The programs described in this report, with data and a framework within which conducted over the 2004-2005 period, reflect to consider the pros and cons of issues on a new stage in the Sino-American relation- the bilateral agenda. ship. Today, American and Chinese citizens • Exchange programs to invest in the next interact with each other in ways that were generation of leaders in both countries, unimaginable to our founders in 1966. Our through our Public Intellectuals Pro- current exchange programs focus on some gram and Young Leaders Forum, Foreign of the shared interests to which Secretary Policy Colloquium and other initiatives. Zoellick referred, including financial fraud, We value the many partners who make HIV/AIDS and foreign aid policies. Public our work possible: the organizations and education programs address such topics as the individuals in the United States and China Six-Party Talks, U.S.-China security rela- who serve as our project partners and par- tions, intellectual property rights protection ticipants; the government agencies, private and Chinese public opinion on moderniza- philanthropies, and corporations who gener- tion and globalization. ously support our programs; our directors and We are gratified to see the multitude members who respond enthusiastically to our 2 L E T T E R F RO M T H E Ch A I R & P R E S IDE N T requests for intellectual guidance and hands- The past year marks a on assistance; and the dedicated and capable transition in the National members of the National Committee staff. Committee’s leadership. After The National Committee stands ready for the seven years as president, John next stage of U.S.-China relations, confident Holden returned to the corpo- that the strong network it has built over the rate sector at the end of April past 40 years in both the United States and 2005. His successor, Steve China will continue to help in designing Orlins, took the helm on and implementing innovative programs that May 1, 2005. We are grateful advance a strong and positive Sino-American for John’s years of service to relationship. the Committee and his com- mitment to productive U.S.- China relations. We welcome Steve and are confident that, under his leadership, the Na- Carla A. Hills tional Committee will con- Chair tinue to play a leading role in engaging citizens of China and the United States in dialogue on issues of mutual interest and concern. — Carla A. Hills Stephen A. Orlins President 3 2 0 0 4 - 2 0 0 5 E XC H A ng E S & C O nf ERE N CE S xchange programs and conferences remain at the other regional security issues. National Committee heart of the National Committee’s work, provid- exchanges in this sensitive arena are not expected to Eing a channel for Americans and Chinese to ex- provide solutions but rather create an environment in change views and enhance their understanding of each which differences can be productively explored and other. For some participants, this may be a first opportu- areas of common concern can be identified. nity to interact with their peers in the other country; for Taiwan’s presidential election in March 2004 others, it may add a new dimension to their perspec- and legislative elections in December 2004 were the tive on complex issues in the bilateral relationship. In backdrop for two exchange programs that focused on many cases, participating in a brief exchange program relations between Beijing and Taipei. or attending a conference opens the door to continuing The first was a small group of specialists who con- collaboration between individuals and institutions, ex- stituted a subset of a diverse group that had participated panding the impact of the National Committee’s work in the Committee’s August 2003 conference on “New to additional colleagues and community members. Challenges and Opportunities in Cross-Strait Rela- These programs would not succeed without the tions.” They spent time in Taipei and Beijing in Janu- support of our funders and the generous contributions of ary 2004, conveying American interests and perspec- time and resources from our network of directors, mem- tives on cross-Strait matters. bers, friends and specialists. We extend our gratitude to In January 2005, the National Committee con- all of these partners, who have helped us in our work of tinued its collaboration with the Preventive Defense promoting understanding and cooperation between the Project (PDP), a joint program of Stanford University United States and China.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 8900 Michael's Chapters.Indd
    2004 PRESIDENTIAL TRANSITION S E R I E S FROM Becoming an Effective Political Executive: 7 Lessons from Experienced Appointees Judith E. Michaels Essays on Working in Washington by: John H. Trattner, Council for Excellence in Government Dana Michael Harsell, Hartwick College Mark A. Abramson, IBM Center for The Business of Government Paul R. Lawrence, IBM Business Consulting Services Second Edition January 2005 Part II Essays on Working in Washington Working with the Congress By John H. Trattner Working with the Media By John H. Trattner Working with Career Executives to Manage for Results By Dana Michael Harsell Working to Transform Your Organization By Mark A. Abramson and Paul R. Lawrence 20 IBM Center for The Business of Government BECOMING AN EFFECTIVE POLITICAL EXECUTIVE Working to Transform Your Organization By Mark A. Abramson, IBM Center for The Business of Government and Paul R. Lawrence, IBM Business Consulting Services (Adapted from Transforming Organizations) Transforming organizations is hard work. It is not • Department of Defense (DoD) under Deputy From these case studies of the four organizations, for the fainthearted or thin-skinned. A leader is Secretary (and then Secretary) William Perry. eight common lessons emerged about how lead- not going to win many new friends or popularity The DoD case study focuses on procure- ers successfully undertake large-scale transforma- contests by undertaking major transformation ini- ment reform within the Department of tion initiatives. tiatives. In spite of the difficulty, we expect trans- Defense, including key roles played by formation to continue as 20th century bureaucracies Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition Lesson 1: Select the Right Person are streamlined into high-performing 21st century and Technology Paul Kaminski, Deputy organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Report Advisory Committee Human Radiation Lxperzments
    Interim Report of the Advisory Committee . on Human Radiation Lxperzments October 21,1994 DISCLAIMER This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied. or assumes any legal liability or responsi- bility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Refer- ence herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by trade name. trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, ram- mendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof. DISTRIBUTION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS LINUMITm , . _. -.-,..- DISCLAIMER Portions of this document may be illegible in electronic image products. Images are produced from the best available original document. ADVISORYCOMMITTEE ON HUMANRADIATION EXPERIMENTS 1726 M STREET,N.W., SUITE 600 WASHINGTON,D.C. 20036 WMORANDUM TO: Members of the Interagency Working Group Secretary Hazel O'Leary, Department of Energy Secretary William Perry, Department of Defense Attorney General Janet Reno, Department of Justice Secretary Donna Shalala. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Jesse Brown, Department of VeteransAflairs Director Alice Rivlin, Ofice of Management and Budget Director James Woolsey, Central Intelligence Agency Administrator Daniel Goldin, National Aeronautics and Space Administration FROM: The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments DATE: October 21,1994 RE: Interim Report The Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments is pleased to transmit its Interim Report to the Interagency Working Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Ashton B. Carter, William J. Perry (1999). Preventive Defense
    list’ contains the most dangerous threats to the existence of the USA and Western world. The former Soviet Union had the Ashton B. Carter, William J. Perry capability to destroy Western values and (1999). Preventive Defense: A Western order, but such an enemy to the New Security Strategy for West no longer exists. The major part of US America. defense planning is now directed towards maintaining the capability to wage two Washington: Brookings Institution major theater wars. Such regional contin- Press. pp. 243. gencies might endanger American interests ISBN 0-8157-1308-8 and security, but would not question the existence of the United States. Therefore, wars of this type can be categorized in belonging to the ’B-list’ of threats. Public The United States of America is found- interest seems to be oriented mostly ing its national security and military strate- towards the activities that deal with the ’C- gies on three groups of activities, called list’ of threats, like those in Bosnia- preparing, shaping and responding. Herzegovina or Kosovo. However, the ’A- Responding capability refers to current list’ may not remain clear forever. One of readiness of the armed forces to engage the most important goals of the American and successfully annihilate open threats to security system is to keep the ’A-list’ clear national security. That readiness was as long as possible. Dr Perry and Dr Carter assessed during the nineties according to argue that this is the essential element of the military capability in successfully waging the preventive defense strategy, which they and winning two almost simultaneous major theoretically developed at Harvard and theater wars, like the one in Korea and in Stanford universities and practically The Gulf.
    [Show full text]
  • Nominations Submitted to the Senate Checklist of White House Press
    Administration of William J. Clinton, 1996 881 the dinner, he returned to Washington, DC, which was sent to the Senate on October 27, arriving after midnight. 1995. The President announced his intention to nominate Arma Jane Karaer as Ambassador Submitted May 15 to Papua New Guinea, to the Solomon Is- Christina A. Snyder, lands, and to Vanuatu. of California, to be U.S. District Judge for The President accorded the personal rank the Central District of California, vice Ed- of Ambassador to James W. Pardew, Jr., in ward Rafeedie, retired. his capacity as U.S. Special Representative for Military Stabilization in the Balkans. Thomas W. Thrash, Jr., The President announced his intention to of Georgia, to be U.S. District Judge for the nominate Alan Philip Larson to be an Assist- Northern District of Georgia, vice Robert L. ant Secretary of State for Economic and Vining, Jr., retired. Business Affairs. Submitted May 16 J. Rene Josey, of South Carolina, to be U.S. Attorney for Nominations the District of South Carolina for the term Submitted to the Senate of 4 years, vice J. Preston Strom, Jr., re- signed. The following list does not include promotions of members of the Uniformed Services, nominations to the Service Academies, or nominations of For- eign Service officers. Checklist of White House Press Releases Submitted May 13 The following list contains releases of the Office Harold Walter Geisel, of the Press Secretary that are neither printed as of Illinois, a career member of the Senior items nor covered by entries in the Digest of Foreign Service, class of Minister-Counselor, Other White House Announcements.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Documents
    Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents Monday, January 31, 1994 Volume 30ÐNumber 4 Pages 135±165 1 VerDate 25-MAR-98 11:23 Mar 28, 1998 Jkt 010199 PO 00001 Frm 00001 Fmt 1249 Sfmt 1249 E:\TEMP\P04JA4.000 INET03 Contents Addresses to the Nation Communications to CongressÐContinued State of the UnionÐ148 Cyprus, letterÐ146 Greece, agreement on Social Security, Addresses and Remarks message transmittingÐ158 See also Appointments and Nominations Organization of American States protocols, Los Angeles earthquake message transmitting to the SenateÐ158 Roundtable discussionÐ135 TeleconferenceÐ141 Executive Orders Radio addressÐ139 North Pacific Anadromous Fish Appointments and Nominations CommissionÐ159 North Pacific Marine Science OrganizationÐ Air Force Department, Assistant SecretaryÐ 159 147 Principles for Federal Infrastructure Army Department, Assistant SecretariesÐ147 InvestmentsÐ160 Defense Department, Secretary, remarksÐ 144 Interviews With the News Media Environmental Protection Agency, Region I Exchanges with reporters AdministratorÐ160 Oval OfficeÐ143 Federal Maritime Commission, State FloorÐ144 CommissionerÐ147 Transportation Department, U.S. Coast Statements by the President Guard, CommandantÐ157 See Appointments and Nominations U.S. Court of Appeals, judgesÐ160 Supplementary Materials U.S. District Court, judgesÐ160 Veterans Affairs Department, Deputy Acts approved by the PresidentÐ165 Assistant SecretaryÐ159 Checklist of White House press releasesÐ164 Digest of other White House Communications to Congress announcementsÐ162
    [Show full text]
  • The Logic of Zero
    november / december 2oo8 The Logic of Zero Toward a World Without Nuclear Weapons Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal Volume 87 • Number 6 The contents of Foreign Affairs are copyrighted.©2008 Council on Foreign Relations, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction and distribution of this material is permitted only with the express written consent of Foreign Affairs. Visit www.foreignaffairs.org/permissions for more information. The Logic of Zero Toward a World Without Nuclear Weapons Ivo Daalder and Jan Lodal U.S. nuclear weapons were born nearly 65 years ago with the purpose of winning a worldwide war against Nazi Germany and imperial Japan. They grew up to deter a massive Soviet army that threatened to invade and dominate all of Europe. With the disap- pearance of that threat almost 20 years ago, nuclear weapons entered middle age in search of a new mission—a search that continues to this day. Some suggest nuclear weapons are necessary to deter, or even preempt, the proliferation of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction. Others believe they are needed to destroy deeply buried, hardened targets in hostile states. But the reality is that only one real purpose remains for U.S. nuclear weapons: to prevent the use of nuclear weapons by others. That reality has yet to sink in. U.S. nuclear policies remain stuck in the Cold War, even as the threats the United States faces have changed dramatically. Today, the gravest threat comes from the possibility of terrorists bent on delivering a devastating blow against the United States acquiring the capacity to do so with nuclear weapons.
    [Show full text]
  • Date of License Party 1 Party 2 Marriage Date
    Reception Number Date of License Party 1 Party 2 Marriage Date Book / Page July 8, 1877 Percival, George A Richards, Margaret July 9, 1877 MLBD1_P1 July 19, 1877 Chaffie, CSE Benton, Marcilla A July 19, 1877 MLBD1_P1 October 14, 1877 Goss, Carver P Squires, Francis A October 19, 1877 MLBD1_P1 October 16, 1877 Adler, Albert Berstein, Lena October 16, 1877 MLBD1_P2 August 10, 1878 Mayol, Frederick Bashaw, Caroline Virginia August 17, 1878 MLBD1_P2 August 18, 1878 Cuddigau, Patrick R Wood, Eliza August 31, 1878 MLBD1_P2 September 24, 1878 Rockwood, Thomas Grout, Zadie M October 3, 1878 MLBD1_P3 October 14, 1878 Strayer, John W Souger, Sarah October 14, 1878 MLBD1_P3 October 27, 1878 Spencer, George W Birdler, Franeis Emma October 27, 1878 MLBD1_P3 February 3, 1878 Rawles, Charles H Rudel, Harriet February 3, 1878 MLBD1_P4 November 28, 1877 Ohlwiler, Jacob Quiggle, Kate November 28, 1877 MLBD1_P4 January 9, 1878 Caire, David Benton, Laura Virginia January 9, 1878 MLBD1_P4 November 9, 1878 Barker, John J Isbel, Caroline A January 3, 1879 MLBD1_P5 November 5, 1878 Vandiver, John Russell, Mary January 31, 1879 MLBD1_P5 September 9, 1978 Johnson, John Egan, Mary December 5, 1878 MLBD1_P5 November 13, 1878 Grover, Taylor Higgins, Alice November 13, 1878 MLBD1_P6 February 27, 1879 Long, Alfred E Chlisiter, Kate February2 7, 1879 MLBD1_P6 July 6, 1879 Geilz, George Frohnicke, Annie July 7, 1879 MLBD1_P6 August 10, 1879 Church, Ris McNeal, Laura August 17, 1879 MLBD1_P7 October 28, 1879 Paff, A F Call, Jennie December 16, 1879 MLBD1_P7 November 5,
    [Show full text]
  • About the Contributors
    ABOUT THE CONTRIBUTORS IAN EASTON is a Research Fellow at the Project 2049 Institute, where he studies emerging security issues in Asia. Previously, he spent two years at the Center for Naval Analyses (CNA Corpora- tion) as a China analyst. Before that Ian lived and worked in Tai- wan (the Republic of China) and the People’s Republic of China for five years. Ian holds an M.A. in China studies from National Chengchi University in Taipei, a B.A. in international studies from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, and a certification in advanced Mandarin Chinese. He received his formal language training in Taipei and Shanghai. CHARLES FERGUSON was the president of the Federation of American Scientists from 2010-2017. At the Council on Foreign Relations, he most recently served as the project director of the Independent Task Force on U.S. Nuclear Weapons Policy, chaired by William J. Perry and Brent Scowcroft. In addition to his work at CFR where he specialized in arms control, climate change, energy policy, and nuclear and radiological terrorism, Dr. Ferguson also is an adjunct professor in the security studies program at George- town University. He has done scientific research at the Los Ala- mos National Laboratory, the Space Telescope Science Institute, the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, and the Univer- sity of Maryland. After graduating with distinction from the United States Naval Academy, he served as a nuclear engineering officer on a ballistic-missile submarine. He holds a Ph.D. in physics from Boston University. 188 Alternative East Asian Nuclear Futures: Volume I GREGORY S.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 1996 / Notices
    24536 Federal Register / Vol. 61, No. 95 / Wednesday, May 15, 1996 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF STATE statements which, as required by law, added by Section 515(a)(1) of the Federal employees filed with their Foreign Relations Authorization Act, Office of Protocol employing agencies during calendar Fiscal Year 1978 (Public Law 95±105, year 1995 concerning gifts received from [Public Notice 2365] August 17, 1977, 91 Stat. 865). foreign governments sources. The Dated: March 19, 1996. compilation includes reports of both Gifts to Federal Employees From Richard Moose, Foreign Government Sources tangible gifts and gifts of travel or travel Reported to Employing Agencies in expenses of more than minimal value, Under Secretary for Management. Calendar Year 1995 as defined by statute. Publication of this listing in the The Department of State submits the Federal Register is required by Section following comprehensive listing of the 7342(f) of Title 5, United States Code, as AGENCY: EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT Report of Tangible GiftsÐ1995 Gift, date of acceptance on behalf Name and title of person accept- of the U.S. Government, esti- Identity of foreign donor and gov- Circumstances justifying accept- ing gift on behalf of the U.S. Gov- mated value, and current disposi- ernment ance ernment tion or location First Family ................................... 25′′×33′′ gold-framed portrait of an His Excellency Punsalmaagiin Non-acceptance would cause em- Asian woman in native dress. Ochirbat, President of Mongolia, barrassment to donor and U.S. RecdÐSeptember 7, 1995. Est. and Mrs. Tsevelmaa. Government. ValueÐ$300. Archive Foreign. First Family ................................... (1) Tyrone leaded crystal vase The Right Honorable Councillor Non-acceptance would cause em- with an engraving of Belfast Eric Smyth, The Lord Mayor of barrassment to donor and U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Nbr Shali 0531
    shali a tribute to john m. shalikashvili the national bureau of asian research the general who advances without coveting fame and retreats without fearing disgrace, whose only thought is to protect his country and do good service for his sovereign, is the jewel of the kingdom. Sun Tzu, The Art of War George Russell and John Shalikashvili—2004 e is a career military man, a world- est-ranking military officer, Chairman of Asia program. To honor these contribu- H class strategic thinker, and a skillful the Joint Chiefs of Staff. tions and those he made as a truly remark- consensus builder. He is also a great In true American spirit, Shali selflessly able soldier, we are establishing the bipartisan leader in the tradition of the worked his entire life to promote democ- Shalikashvili Chair in National Security late Senator Henry M. Jackson, the racy around the world through the strong, Studies at NBR, with tremendous appreci- Washington Senator to whom NBR traces yet compassionate, extension of American ation for the enthusiastic support of his its roots. He is as down-to-earth as they national interests. As Chairman, and after, family, friends, and colleagues around the come. He is the man we are honoring, the he also devoted his talents to addressing world. Thank you for joining us in our general we all know as “Shali”. the most intractable security challenges in tribute to Shali. They say “Great accomplishments start Asia, including the China-Taiwan issue To Shali, I say, thank you for your with dreams—and dreams are brought to and the North Korean nuclear program.
    [Show full text]
  • Iraq Study Group Report
    The Iraq Study Group Report James A. Baker, III, and Lee H. Hamilton, Co-Chairs Lawrence S. Eagleburger, Vernon E. Jordan, Jr., Edwin Meese III, Sandra Day O’Connor, Leon E. Panetta, William J. Perry, Charles S. Robb, Alan K. Simpson Contents Letter from the Co-Chairs Executive Summary I. Assessment A. Assessment of the Current Situation in Iraq 1. Security 2. Politics 3. Economics 4. International Support 5. Conclusions B. Consequences of Continued Decline in Iraq C. Some Alternative Courses in Iraq 1. Precipitate Withdrawal 2. Staying the Course 3. More Troops for Iraq 4. Devolution to Three Regions D. Achieving Our Goals II. The Way Forward—A New Approach A. The External Approach: Building an International Consensus 1. The New Diplomatic Offensive 2. The Iraq International Support Group 3. Dealing with Iran and Syria 4. The Wider Regional Context B. The Internal Approach: Helping Iraqis Help Themselves 1. Performance on Milestones 2 2. National Reconciliation 3. Security and Military Forces 4. Police and Criminal Justice 5. The Oil Sector 6. U.S. Economic and Reconstruction Assistance 7. Budget Preparation, Presentation, and Review 8. U.S. Personnel 9. Intelligence Appendices Letter from the Sponsoring Organizations Iraq Study Group Plenary Sessions Iraq Study Group Consultations Expert Working Groups and Military Senior Advisor Panel The Iraq Study Group Iraq Study Group Support 3 Letter from the Co-Chairs There is no magic formula to solve the problems of Iraq. However, there are actions that can be taken to improve the situation and protect American interests. Many Americans are dissatisfied, not just with the situation in Iraq but with the state of our political debate regarding Iraq.
    [Show full text]
  • Transformation and Transition: DARPA's Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs Volume 1
    INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES Transformation and Transition: DARPA’s Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs Volume 1 – Overall Assessment Richard H. Van Atta, Project Leader and Michael J. Lippitz with Jasper C. Lupo Rob Mahoney Jack H. Nunn April 2003 Approved for public release; distribution unlimited. IDA Paper P-3698 Log: H 03-000693 Copy This work was conducted under contract DASW01 98 C 0067, Task DA-6-2018, for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The publication of this IDA document does not indicate endorsement by the Department of Defense, nor should the contents be construed as reflecting the official position of that Agency. © 2003 Institute for Defense Analyses, 4850 Mark Center Drive, Alexandria, Virginia 22311-1882 • (703) 845-2000. This material may be reproduced by or for the U.S. Government pursuant to the copyright license under the clause at DFARS 252.227-7013 (Nov. 95). INSTITUTE FOR DEFENSE ANALYSES IDA Paper P-3698 Transformation and Transition: DARPA’s Role in Fostering an Emerging Revolution in Military Affairs Volume 1 – Overall Assessment Richard H. Van Atta, Project Leader and Michael J. Lippitz with Jasper C. Lupo Rob Mahoney Jack H. Nunn PREFACE This report summarizes work performed by the Institute for Defense Analyses for the Director of the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), in partial fulfillment of the task entitled “DARPA’s Role in Fostering a Revolution in Military Affairs (RMA).” It highlights the roles DARPA has played since the 1970s in developing and exploiting advanced technological systems to create fundamental warfighting advantages for US military forces.
    [Show full text]