CURRICULUM VITAE Neal H

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CURRICULUM VITAE Neal H CURRICULUM VITAE Neal H. Lopinot I. PERSONAL Date/Place of Birth: November 2, 1951/East St. Louis, Illinois Present Position (1993–): Director and Research Professor, Secretary of the Missouri Archaeological Society, Center for Archaeological Research, Missouri State University, 901 South National Avenue, Springfield, MO 65897; Telephone No. - (417)–836–5363; Facsimile No. - (417)–836–4772 Home Residence: 1834 South Dollison Avenue, Springfield, MO 65807 E-Mail Address: [email protected] II. EDUCATION 1977 - M.A. (Anthropology - Conservation Archaeology Program), SIU-Carbondale. Dr. George J. Gumerman, Committee Chair. 1984 - Ph.D. (Anthropology, specializing in Archaeology), SIU-Carbondale. Dr. David P. Braun, Committee Chair. III. TEACHING EXPERIENCE A. Teaching Interests and Specialties (Courses Taught): Introduction to Archaeology Archaeology of North America (2 Semesters) Archaeology of the Ozarks (1 Intersession) Cultural Resource Management Archaeology of the Eastern Woodlands Ethnohistory: Eastern and Southwestern North America Human Ecology (1 Quarter) Plant Domestication and Agricultural Origins Archaeobotanical Method and Theory (Several Individuals) Field School in Archaeology (4 Semesters and 2 Quarters) World Prehistory (1 Semester) B. Lectures/Other Honors: Given a variety of lectures to students, professionals, and amateurs. Some examples of invited lectures and honors are as follows: 1. Colloquium Presentation, Experimental Archaeobotany and Reconstructing the Past, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis, 1986. 2. Invited Lecturer for Archaeological Theory and Method, SIU-Edwardsville, 1978, 1985, and 1990. 3. Invited Presentation on Wood Procurement and Utilization at Cahokia in series titled Cahokia Mounds: A Crossroads of Commerce, Cahokia Mounds, Collinsville, 1988. 4. Department of the Army Commander’s Award for Civilian Service, St. Louis District, Corps of Engineers, 1993. 5. Invited Presentation titled Prehistoric Human Impacts on the Environment: Myths and Realities, Environmental Education Association of Illinois, Pere Marquette Lodge, 1993. 1 6. 1999 Poster Award, 1st Place, Professional Division, Society for American Archaeology, Chicago, Illinois. 7. Invited Speaker, 35th Anniversary Celebration of the Missouri Prairie Foundation, Columbia, Missouri, 2001. 8. Received Certificate of Appreciation from the Missouri Archaeological Society for many years of service, 2002. 9. Recipient of two grants from the Committee for Research and Exploration of the National Geographic Society for research at Big Eddy, 1999 and 2002. 10. Invited Presentations, History Department, University of West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad, for Archaeological Method and Theory Course; and recipient of grants from the Ministry of Culture, Trinidad and Tobago, 2003, 2006, and 2009. 11. Recipient of Missouri 2003 Historic Preservation Award and Resolutions from the Missouri House of Representatives and the Missouri Senate, presented in the State Capitol Rotunda, February, 2003. 12. Recipient of the Missouri Archaeological Society’s Public Archaeology Award, 2005. 13. Delivered the Albert C. Koch Banquet Lecture, Honored Speaker at the Annual Missouri Archaeological Society Meeting, Joplin, Missouri, 2006. 14. Plenary session speaker at the 31st annual Society of Ethnobiology Conference, Fayetteville, Arkansas, 2008. 15. Invited Participant in the Paleoamerican Origins Workshop, University of Texas, Austin, and also a conference by invitation only titled Early Paleoindian Colonization of the North American Midcontinent, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2008 and 2009, respectively. 16. Organized and participated in Trinidad & Tobago Archaeology Heritage Management Seminar, held at the Chaguaramas Campus in Trinidad on March 14, 2014. C. Previous Appointments: 1984–1987 - Adjunct Assistant Professor, Dept. of Anthropology (50% teaching), and Assistant Director, Archaeological Survey (50% research), University of Missouri at St. Louis. 1984–1990 - Research Associate, Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St. Louis. 1987–1991 - Associate Coordinator, Contract Archaeology Program, Southern Illinois University at Edwardsville, and Adjunct Assistant Professor, Department of Geography and Earth Sciences and Department of Anthropology. 1991–1993 - Associate Scientist-Archaeologist, Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, Intergovernmental Personnel Act (IPA) consultant assigned to the St. Louis District, Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis, Missouri. D. Masters Committees: Patty J. Wright, Washington University-St. Louis, 1986 Bonnie L. Gums, Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville, 1988 Joyce Williams, Southern Illinois University-Edwardsville, 1989 Sarah O’Donnell, Missouri State University, 2013 Jennifer Rideout, Missouri State University, 2015 IV. MEMBERSHIPS IN PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Lambda Alpha-National Anthropology Honors Society Midwestern Archaeology Conference Missouri Archaeological Society Missouri Association of Professional Archaeologists Society for American Archaeology 2 Southeastern Archaeology Conference Transferware Club V. COMMUNITY SERVICE (some examples) 1973–1975 - Board of Directors, Cahokia Archaeological Society (CAS), Illinois Amateur Archaeological Association (IAAA). 1974–Present - Lectures given to archaeological/amateur groups, other interested lay groups, civic organizations, and elementary and secondary schoolers on archaeology, general midcontinental prehistory, archaeobotanical projects and methods, and various archaeological sites at which I have worked. Given numerous formal and informal lectures and tours at the Cahokia Mounds site, in addition to aiding the preparation of exhibits for the Cahokia Interpretive Center. 1982–1998 - Girls Catholic Youth League and Club Soccer Head Coach (earned Class D Coaching License); Florissant and Springfield, Missouri. 1984–1989 - Webelos Den and Boy Scout Troop Leader, North Star District, Florissant, Missouri. 1986–1988 - Member of Board of Directors, Illinois Archaeological Survey (IAS), the professional state organization of Illinois. 1993–Present - Sponsor of the Ozarks Chapter of the Missouri Archaeological Society (OCMAS). 2000–2006 - Greene County Historic Sites Board (Vice Chair for 2 years); Chair of GCHSB Planning and Zoning Review committee from 2003 to 2006. 2000–2004 - Southwest Missouri Regional Coordinator for Archaeology Challenge Program. 2002–2008 - Missouri Archaeological Society (MAS), Board of Trustees. 2004–Present - Missouri Association of Professional Archaeologists (MAPA), Board of Directors. 2006–Present – MAS Secretary and Editor of The Missouri Archaeologist and the Missouri Archaeological Society Quarterly 2009–2014 - Odyssey Archaeological Research Program, University of Kansas, Board of Directors. 2011–Present - Greene County Historic Sites Board; Vice Chair since 2014. 2013–Present – Editorial Board, Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 2013–Present – Advisory Board, Missouri Trail of Tears Association VI. PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE A. Graduate Assistantships 1974 (Fall Quarter) 1/2-time Teaching Assistant, Department of Anthropology, SIU-Edwardsville; Assistant to Dr. Theodore Frisbie. 1975 (Winter-Spring Quarters), 1/2-time Teaching Assistant, Department of Anthropology, SIU- Edwardsville; Assistant to Dr. Sidney Denny. 1975 (Fall Semester) l/4-time Research Assistant, Black Mesa Archaeological Project, Department of Anthropology, SIU-Carbondale; Assistant to Dr. Stephen Plog, Research Supervisor. 1976 (Spring Semester) 1/4-time Research Assistant, Black Bottom Archaeological Project, Department of Anthropology, SIU-Carbondale; Dr. Jon Muller, Research Supervisor. 1976 (Spring Semester) 1/4-time Research Assistant, Star Lake Archaeological Project, Department of Anthropology, SIU-Carbondale; Dr. Walter Wait, Research Supervisor. 1976 (Fall Semester) 1/2-time Research Assistant, Star Lake Project, Department of Anthropology, SIU- Carbondale; Dr. George Gumerman, Research Supervisor. 1977–1978 (Fall & Spring Semesters) 1/4-time Teaching Assistant, Department of Anthropology, SIU- Carbondale; Dr. Dean Falk (Physical Anthropologist). 1978 (Spring Semester) 1/4-time Research Assistant; Center for Archaeological Investigations, SIU- Carbondale; Dr. Brian Butler, Research Supervisor. 3 B. Field Experience 1972–1973 (6 wks.), Solto site, St. Charles County, Missouri; Volunteer; F. Terry Norris and Carl Chapman, principal investigators. 1973 (8 wks.), Olin site, Cottage Hills, Madison County, Illinois; Field School; Dr. Sidney G. Denny, Principal Investigator/Teacher. 1974 (8 wks.), Lily Lake site, Cahokia, St. Clair County, Illinois; National Park Service funded; Research Assistant; Mr. F. Terry Norris and Mr. Albert Meyer, Supervisors. 1974 (12 wks.) Olin site; Supervisor of limited off-season excavations; Dr. Sidney Denny, Project Director. 1975 (8 wks.) Lily Lake site; Research Assistant; renewed National Park Service grant; Mr. Norris and Mr. Meyer, Supervisors. 1976 (4 wks.) Star Lake Archaeological Project, Upper Chaco Wash, McKinley County, New Mexico; Supervisor of survey and testing crews; funded by Peabody Coal Company; Dr. Walter Wait, Project Director, and Dr. George Gumerman, Principal Investigator. 1976 (3 wks.) Southeastern Missouri and Western Kentucky; Supervisor of survey and testing; funded by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Memphis District; Mr. Michael McNerney, Principal Investigator. 1976 (2 wks.)
Recommended publications
  • A Late Archaic Titterington-Phase Site in St. Louis County, Missouri: the Schoettler Road Site (23SL178/1105) Richard Martens Table 1
    A Late Archaic Titterington-Phase Site in St. Louis County, Missouri: The Schoettler Road Site (23SL178/1105) Richard Martens Table 1. The Temporal Periods Represented at the Schoettler Site and the Percentages of the Lithic Artifacts in these Periods. he Schoettler Road site occurs in the uplands near the Temporal Category No. of Artifacts % of Total Artifacts TMissouri River valley. It was discovered by the author in January 1969. This site was actively collected until it was Dalton 16 5.8 destroyed in the middle 1970s during construction of the Early Archaic 5 1.8 Sycamore Estates subdivision. A total of 334 lithic artifacts Middle Archaic 20 7.3 from this prolific site represents occupations dating from Late Archaic 223 81.1 Late Paleoindian through Historic times, with the majority attributed to the Late Archaic Titterington phase. Titterington 213 77.5 This is the second article in a series written to document Other phases 10 3.6 artifacts from destroyed or “lost sites” (Martens 2006). Early Woodland 1 0.4 This extremely valuable information would otherwise be lost to Missouri’s archaeological database. It is hoped that Middle Woodland 6 2.2 these articles will provide educational material for inter- Late Woodland 2 0.7 ested adults and students, as well as encourage avocational Mississippian 2 0.7 archaeologists to document their finds. Grand Total 275 100 The site was located in the City of Chesterfield on the south-facing side of a hill that gently slopes down to Creve Coeur Creek. The artifacts were found scattered in an lected and excavated in the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Marsland Class III Cultural Resource Investigation (April 28, 2011)
    NRC-054B Submitted: 5/8/2015 I AR CAD IS Marsland Expansion Cultural Inventory I I I I I I I I Figure4. Project overview in Section 35 T30N R51W, facing south. Photograph taken by N. Graves, on 12/02/2010. I I I I I I I I Figure 5. Project overview in Section 2 T29N R51W, facing northeast. Photograph taken by A. Howder on 12/03/2010. I 4 I -1- I ARCADJS Marsland Expansion Cultural Inventory I I I I I I I I I Figure 6. Project overview in Section 1 T29N R51W, facing southeast. Photograph taken by A. Howder on 12/04/2010. I I I I I I I I F. Topographic Map 5 I -2- I AR CAD IS Marsland Expansion Cultural Inventory I V. Environmental Setting I A. Present Environment 1. General Topographic Features I The MEAUP is located in the northern Nebraska Panhandle roughly 10 to 12 miles south of Crawford, Nebraska and five miles northeast of Marsland, Nebraska. This portion of the Nebraska Panhandle is dominated topographically by the Pine Ridge escarpment, a rugged, stony region of forested buttes and I deep canyons that divides the High Plains to the south from the Missouri Plateau to the north. The project area straddles the southernmost boundary of the Pine Ridge escarpment and another distinct topographic region to the south, the Dawes Table lands. Taken together, these regions form a unique local mosaic of I topography, geology, and habitat within the project area. I 2. Project Area a. Topography I The Pine Ridge escarpment covers more than one thousand square miles across far eastern Wyoming, northern Nebraska and extreme southern South Dakota (Nebraska State Historical Society 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Community: Microwear Analysis of Blades at the Mound House Site
    Illinois State University ISU ReD: Research and eData Theses and Dissertations 4-16-2019 Understanding Community: Microwear Analysis of Blades at the Mound House Site Silas Levi Chapman Illinois State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd Part of the History of Art, Architecture, and Archaeology Commons Recommended Citation Chapman, Silas Levi, "Understanding Community: Microwear Analysis of Blades at the Mound House Site" (2019). Theses and Dissertations. 1118. https://ir.library.illinoisstate.edu/etd/1118 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ISU ReD: Research and eData. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ISU ReD: Research and eData. For more information, please contact [email protected]. UNDERSTANDING COMMUNITY: MICROWEAR ANALYSIS OF BLADES AT THE MOUND HOUSE SITE SILAS LEVI CHAPMAN 89 Pages Understanding Middle Woodland period sites has been of considerable interest for North American archaeologists since early on in the discipline. Various Middle Woodland period (50 BCE-400CE) cultures participated in shared ideas and behaviors, such as constructing mounds and earthworks and importing exotic materials to make objects for ceremony and for interring with the dead. These shared behaviors and ideas are termed by archaeologists as “Hopewell”. The Mound House site is a floodplain mound group thought to have served as a “ritual aggregation center”, a place for the dispersed Middle Woodland communities to congregate at certain times of year to reinforce their shared identity. Mound House is located in the Lower Illinois River valley within the floodplain of the Illinois River, where there is a concentration of Middle Woodland sites and activity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015-2004 Accomplishments
    Kansas Geological Survey Publications, Accomplishments, and Service 2015 Refereed Publications Bidgoli, T. S., Amir, E., Walker, J. D., Stockli, D. F., Andrew, J. E., and Caskey, J. S., 2015, Low-temperature thermochronology of the Black and Panamint mountains, Death Valley, CA: Implications for geodynamic controls on Cenozoic intraplate strain: Lithosphere, v. 8. doi:10.1130/L406. Bidgoli, T. S., Stockli, D. F., and Walker, J. D., 2015, Low-temperature thermochronologic constraints on the kinematic histories of the Castle Cliffs, Tule Springs, and Mormon Peak detachments, southeastern Nevada and southwestern Utah: Geosphere, v. 11. doi:10.1130/GES01083.1. Cramer, B. D., Vandenbroucke, T. R. A., and Ludvigson, G. A., 2015, High-Resolution Event Stratigraphy (HiRES) and the quantification of stratigraphic uncertainty: Silurian examples of the quest for precision in stratigraphy: Earth Science Reviews, v. 141, p. 136–153. http:/dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.11.011. Johnson, B. G., Layzell, A. L., and Eppes, M. C., 2015, Chronosequence development and soil variability from a variety of sub-alpine, post-glacial landforms and deposits in the southeastern San Juan Mountains of Colorado: Catena, v. 127, p. 222–239. Kraus, M. J., Woody, D. T., Smith, J. J., and Dukic, V., 2015, Alluvial response to the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum climatic event, Polecat Bench, Wyoming (U.S.A.): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.06.021. Layzell, A. L., Mandel, R. D., Ludvigson, G. A., Rittenour, T. M., and Smith, J. J., 2015, Forces driving late Pleistocene (ca. 77–12 ka) landscape evolution in the Cimarron River valley, southwestern Kansas: Quaternary Research, v.
    [Show full text]
  • State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures
    State Parks and Early Woodland Cultures Key Objectives State Parks Featured Students will understand some basic information related to the ■ Mounds State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2977.htm Adena, Hopewell and early Woodland Indians, and their connec- ■ Falls of the Ohio State Park www.in.gov/dnr/parklake/2984.htm tions to Mounds and Falls of the Ohio state parks. The students will gain insight into the connection between the Adena culture and the Hopewell tradition, and learn how archaeologists have studied artifacts and mounds to understand these cultures. Activity: Standards: Benchmarks: Assessment Tasks: Key Concepts: Mounds Students will research what was import- Artifacts Identify and compare the major early cultures ant to the Adena Indians. The students Tribes Researching SS.4.1.1 that existed in the region that became Indiana will then compile a list of items found in Adena the Past before contact with Europeans. the Adena mounds and compare them to Hopewell items that we use today. Mississippians Identify and describe historic Native American Use computers in a cooperative group groups that lived in Indiana before the time of to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.2 early European exploration, including ways that the era of the Adena to the rise of the the groups adapted to and interacted with the Hopewell Indians. physical environment. Use computers in a cooperative group Create and interpret timelines that show rela- to create timelines of major events from SS.4.1.15 tionships among people, events and movements the era of the Adena to the rise of the in the history of Indiana.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Archaeology
    INDIANA ARCHAEOLOGY Volume 5 Number 2 2010/2011 Indiana Department of Natural Resources Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Indiana Department of Natural Resources Robert E. Carter, Jr., Director and State Historic Preservation Officer Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology (DHPA) James A. Glass, Ph.D., Director and Deputy State Historic Preservation Officer DHPA Archaeology Staff James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson Cathy L. Draeger-Williams Cathy A. Carson Wade T. Tharp Editors James R. Jones III, Ph.D., State Archaeologist Amy L. Johnson, Senior Archaeologist and Archaeology Outreach Coordinator Cathy A. Carson, Records Check Coordinator Publication Layout: Amy L. Johnson Additional acknowledgments: The editors wish to thank the authors of the submitted articles, as well as all of those who participated in, and contributed to, the archaeological projects which are highlighted. Cover design: The images which are featured on the cover are from several of the individual articles included in this journal. Mission Statement: The Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology promotes the conservation of Indiana’s cultural resources through public education efforts, financial incentives including several grant and tax credit programs, and the administration of state and federally mandated legislation. 2 For further information contact: Division of Historic Preservation and Archaeology 402 W. Washington Street, Room W274 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-2739 Phone: 317/232-1646 Email: [email protected] www.IN.gov/dnr/historic 2010/2011 3 Indiana Archaeology Volume 5 Number 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Authors of articles were responsible for ensuring that proper permission for the use of any images in their articles was obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Reworked Lithics in the Great Dismal Swamp Erin Livengood
    Reworked Lithics in the Great Dismal Swamp Erin Livengood Honors Capstone Advisor: Dr. Dan Sayers Fall 2011 1 Introduction Archaeologists have long studied lithic technologies across the discipline and across the world. Created and used by all cultures, stone tools were made in many traditions using many varied techniques. Analyses of lithic tools can provide insights for archaeologists and can aid in interpretations of archaeological sites. In archaeological excavations, of both historical and prehistoric sites, lithics are commonly found artifacts. Due to the many toolmaking traditions utilized in lithic manufacture, oftentimes age of the lithic, geographic location of the lithic's creation, culture group that developed and utilized the tool and how it was used can be determined from the artifact. An analysis of material type can also be illuminative in lithic study; all of these aspects of study can lend ideas about past culture groups (Andrefsky 2009). The lithics included in the artifact assemblage from the Great Dismal Swamp include several different prehistoric technologies. Within this portion of the artifact assemblage, flakes (quartz, quartzite, rhyolite, and several kinds of unidentified lithic materials), projectile points, pebbles and other types of lithic debitage were discovered. This paper will analyze the reworked lithics included in this collection. These stone tools, namely the projectile points, discovered through archaeological excavations, shed light on the materiality of maroonage, particularly within the historic, social and cultural landscape of the Great Dismal Swamp. 2 Lithic Technologies Before the Time of Contact Many variations of lithic technologies existed in the United States before the time of contact. These stone tools are separated into distinct groupings based on characteristics of the tool.
    [Show full text]
  • Geophysical Investigation of an Early Late Woodland Community in the Middle Ohio River Valley: the Water Plant Site
    Geophysical Investigation of an Early Late Woodland Community in the Middle Ohio River Valley: The Water Plant Site Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for The Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Karen L. Royce, M.A. Graduate Program in Anthropology The Ohio State University 2011 Dissertation Committee: Dr. William S. Dancey, Advisor Dr. Kristen J. Gremillion Dr. Ralph von Frese Copyright by Karen L. Royce 2011 Abstract Geophysical surveys using fluxgate gradiometer and magnetic susceptibility instruments were conducted at the early Late Woodland Water Plant site to investigate the community patterning within the site. The site was first investigated through archaeological survey and excavation under the direction of Dr. William S. Dancey approximately thirty years ago. The Water Plant site is located in Franklin County, Ohio within the Middle Ohio River Valley region. The re-examination of this site using different investigative techniques has yielded additional, illuminating information. As a result of the fluxgate gradiometer survey, the outer prehistoric ditch at the site was mapped in its entirety and defines the community area of the site. An inner prehistoric ditch and palisade were also mapped during the fluxgate gradiometer survey and additionally, sections of post screens were detected at gaps in the outer prehistoric ditch at the site. The magnetic susceptibility survey data indicate that the site area within the ditches had a high frequency of human use. Based on all these data, the site does appear to be definitively defensive in nature based on the two sets of earthen ditches and wooden palisade features encompassing roughly an 8-acre area and may be one of the earliest occurrences of a fortified community in the Middle Ohio River Valley.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalcommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Nebraska Anthropologist Anthropology, Department of 1971 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ABORIGINAL ARCHEOLOGY OF NEBRASKA Donald J. Blakeslee University of Nebraska, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro Part of the Anthropology Commons Blakeslee, Donald J., "A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ABORIGINAL ARCHEOLOGY OF NEBRASKA" (1971). Nebraska Anthropologist. 127. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/nebanthro/127 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Nebraska Anthropologist by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Published in THE NEBRASKA ANTHROPOLOGIST, Volume 1 (1971). Published by the Anthropology Student Group, Department of Anthropology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska 68588 A BIBLIOGRAPHY OF THE ABORIGINAL ARCIIEOLOGY OF NEBRASKA DONALD J. BLAKESLEE UNIVERSITY OF NDBRASKA INTRODUCTION I have tried to make this Bibliography as complete as possible, including material from surrounding states pertinent to the archeological problems of Nebraska and references which pertain more to the history of Nebraska archeology than to its content. In compiling this list, I have used previous biblio­ graphies by Robert W. Neuman (1962b, 1968) and Jerome E. Petsche (1968) which deal in part with Nebraska archeology. ABBREVIATIONS USED
    [Show full text]
  • The Highland Creek Site: Middle to Late Archaic Wetland Utilization in Western Kentucky
    THE HIGHLAND CREEK SITE: MIDDLE TO LATE ARCHAIC WETLAND UTILIZATION IN WESTERN KENTUCKY By Greg Maggard David Pollack With Contributions by Emanuel Breitburg Jack Rossen Nick Hermann Jay Stottman Report Prepared For: Louisville District, United State Army Corps of Engineers P.O. Box 59, Louisville, KY 40201 Kentucky Archaeological Survey Research Report No. 5 (Jointly Administered by: The Kentucky Heritage Council and The University of Kentucky Department of Anthropology) Lexington, Kentucky 2006 Copyright 2006 Kentucky Archaeological Survey All Rights Reserved ii Kentucky Archaeological Survey The Kentucky Archaeological Survey is jointly administered by the Kentucky Heritage Council (State Historic Preservation Office) and the University of Kentucky Department of Anthropology. Its mission is to provide a service to other state agencies, to work with private landowners to protect archaeological sites, and to educate the public about Kentucky’s rich archaeological heritage. Kentucky Heritage Council The mandate of the Kentucky Heritage Council is to identify, preserve, and protect the cultural resources of Kentucky. The Council also maintains continually-updated inventories of historic structures and archaeological sites and nominates properties to the National Register of Historic Places. By working with other state and federal agencies, local communities, and interested citizens, the Council seeks to build a greater awareness of Kentucky’s past and to encourage the long-term preservation of Kentucky’s significant cultural resources. Through its various programs (e.g., Main Street, Grants, Publications, Rural Preservation, Civil War Initiative, Conferences), the Council strives to show how historic resources contribute to the heritage, economy, and quality of life of all Kentuckians. University of Kentucky Department of Anthropology The University of Kentucky Department of Anthropology has a mission to educate students and promote scholarly research in the field of archaeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Cvr Design V2.Ai
    ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE EARLY AND LATE FORT ANCIENT HOWARD SITE (15MA427), MADISON COUNTY, KENTUCKY By David Pollack and Eric J. Schlarb With Contributions By: C. Brian Mabelitini Emanuel Breitburg Rick Burdin Jack Rossen Wesley D. Stoner Kentucky Archaeological Survey Jointly Administered By: University of Kentucky Kentucky Heritage Council KAS Report No. 151 ARCHAEOLOGICAL INVESTIGATIONS OF THE EARLY AND LATE FORT ANCIENT HOWARD SITE (15MA427), MADISON COUNTY, KENTUCKY KAS Report No. 151 By David Pollack and Eric J. Schlarb With Contributions by: C. Brian Mabelitini Emanuel Breitburg Rick Burdin Jack Rossen Wesley D. Stoner Report Prepared for: James Howard Richmond Industrial Development Corporation Report Submitted by: Kentucky Archaeological Survey Jointly Administered by: University of Kentucky Kentucky Heritage Council 1020A Export Street Lexington, Kentucky 40506-9854 859/257-5173 February 2009 __________________________ David Pollack Principal Investigator ABSTRACT The Howard site contains the remains of an early Fort Ancient hamlet and a late Fort Ancient/Contact period village. The early Fort Ancient component is represented by Jessamine Series ceramic and Type 2 Fine Triangular projectile points, while the late Fort Ancient component is represented by Madisonville series ceramics, Type 4 and Type 6 Fine Triangular projectile points, and unifacial and bifacial endscrapers. The presence of a marginella shell bead and mica fragments reflect long distance interaction with groups living to the south, and the recovery of a glass bead and a copper bead points to interaction with Europeans. Based on the presence of intact subplowzone deposits associated with both components, and the recovery of human remains, the Howard site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places.
    [Show full text]
  • Woodland Period in Pennsylvania I. Introduction the Period of Time That Archaeologists Call the Woodland Started at About 3,000
    Woodland Period in Pennsylvania I. Introduction The period of time that archaeologists call the Woodland started at about 3,000 years ago and lasted until shortly after the first Europeans entered Pennsylvania about 450 years ago. During these years, the way of life of the Native Americans living in Pennsylvania gradually changed as populations grew and new technologies were invented or adopted. One of the first changes that occurred was the use of pottery containers, called ceramics. This began at the very beginning of the Woodland Period. Other important changes occurred later, including the cultivation of crops, the use of the bow and arrow for hunting and life in settled village communities. Archaeologists have divided the Woodland Period into three parts, called Early Woodland (3,000 to 2,500 years ago), Middle Woodland (2,500 to 1,200 years ago) and late Woodland (1,200-450 years ago.) II. The Early Woodland (3,000 to 2,500 years ago) At the beginning of the Early Woodland, about 3,000 years ago, Native Americans living in Pennsylvania had a way of life based primarily on hunting wild animals and collecting wild plant foods. In this respect, they were similar to their Archaic Period forbearers. Animals they hunted included those we are familiar with today, such as deer, bear, wild turkey and many small mammals such as squirrels, raccoons and groundhogs. They boiled or roasted the meat. They also dried meat to preserve it so they would have food during lean times. Wild plants they collected included edible roots, berries and many kinds of nuts, including acorns, hickory nuts, walnuts and chestnuts.
    [Show full text]