DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Management Framework Strategic Implementation Plans

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Management Framework Strategic Implementation Plans Environmental Management Framework Strategic Implementation Plans Sustainability Community Engagement Marine Resources Soil/Sediment Water Quality Air Quality Prepared by: D R A F T R E P O R T ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT FRAMEWORK STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION PLANS Prepared for: April 22, 2013 E2 Project Number: 12‐144‐002 5000 E. Spring Street, Suite 720 Long Beach, California 90815 P: (562) 740‐1060 www.E2ManageTech.com TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................... 1 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Overview ................................................................................................................................. 2 1.3 Timeframe and Evaluation ..................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Purpose/Intended Use ............................................................................................................ 2 SECTION 2 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT ........................................................................... 3 2.1 Community Engagement at the Port ...................................................................................... 3 2.2 Community Engagement Strategies ....................................................................................... 3 2.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................... 5 2.4 Conclusion .............................................................................................................................. 6 SECTION 3 SUSTAINABILITY .............................................................................................. 7 3.1 Sustainability and the Port Setting ......................................................................................... 7 3.2 Strategies for Implementing Sustainable Practices ................................................................ 7 3.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................. 10 3.4 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 11 SECTION 4 AIR QUALITY ................................................................................................. 12 4.1 Air Quality and the Port Setting ........................................................................................... 12 4.1.1 Air Emission Sources .................................................................................................. 12 4.1.2 Regulatory Framework .............................................................................................. 13 4.2 Implementation Strategies to Improve Air Quality .............................................................. 13 4.2.1 Short-Term Strategies ................................................................................................ 13 4.2.2 Long-Term Strategies ................................................................................................. 17 4.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................. 18 4.3.1 Update Emissions Inventory ...................................................................................... 18 4.3.2 Other Key Performance Indicators ............................................................................ 19 4.4 Budget .................................................................................................................................. 20 4.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 22 Draft i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 5 MARINE RESOURCES ..................................................................................... 23 5.1 Marine Resources and Port Setting ...................................................................................... 23 5.1.1 Wildlife and Habitat ................................................................................................... 23 5.1.2 Pollutant Sources ....................................................................................................... 24 5.2 Implementation Strategies for Marine Resources Management ......................................... 25 5.2.1 Short-Term Strategies ................................................................................................ 25 5.2.2 Long-Term Strategies ................................................................................................. 27 5.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................. 28 5.3.1 Wildlife Assessment ................................................................................................... 28 5.3.2 Invasive Species Education ........................................................................................ 29 5.3.3 Wetlands Conservation ............................................................................................. 29 5.3.4 Track and Monitor Marine Flora and Fauna .............................................................. 30 5.4 Budget .................................................................................................................................. 30 5.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 31 SECTION 6 SOIL AND SEDIMENT ..................................................................................... 32 6.1 Soil and Sediment Issues in the Port Setting ......................................................................... 32 6.1.1 Sources of Contaminated Soil and Sediment ............................................................ 32 6.1.2 Regulatory Framework .............................................................................................. 33 6.2 Implementation Strategies for Soil and Sediment Management ......................................... 34 6.2.1 Short-Term Strategies ................................................................................................ 34 6.2.2 Long-Term Strategies ................................................................................................. 37 6.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................. 38 6.4 Budget .................................................................................................................................. 38 6.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 40 SECTION 7 WATER QUALITY ........................................................................................... 41 7.1 Water Quality and the Port Setting ...................................................................................... 41 7.1.1 Pollutants Sources of Contamination ........................................................................ 41 7.1.2 Regulatory Framework .............................................................................................. 42 7.2 Implementation Strategies to Improve Water Quality ......................................................... 42 7.2.1 Short-Term Strategies ................................................................................................ 42 7.2.2 Long-Term Strategies ................................................................................................. 45 Draft ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 7.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................. 46 7.4 Budget .................................................................................................................................. 48 7.5 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................ 49 SECTION 8 ENERGY MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 50 8.1 Energy Management and the Port Setting ........................................................................... 50 8.1.1 Regulatory Framework .............................................................................................. 50 8.2 Implementation Strategies for Energy Management ........................................................... 51 8.2.1 Short-Term Strategies ................................................................................................ 52 8.2.2 Long-Term Strategies ................................................................................................. 54 8.3 Key Performance Indicators.................................................................................................. 55 8.4 Budget .................................................................................................................................. 55 8.5 Conclusion ...........................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cold Ironing Report
    PRELIMINARY DRAFT—DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE I. INTRODUCTION This report presents an analysis of the feasibility and cost effectiveness of cold-ironing ocean-going vessels while docked at California ports. Cold-ironing refers to shutting down auxiliary engines on ships while in port and connecting to electrical power supplied at the dock, thus eliminating virtually all emissions from a ship while it is in port. (Cold-ironing is also referred to as “shore power” and alternative maritime power). The term “cold-ironing” comes from the act of dry-docking a vessel, which involves shutting down all on-board combustion, resulting in the vessel going “cold.” Without cold-ironing, auxiliary engines run continuously while a ship is docked, or “hotelled,” at a berth to power lighting, ventilation, pumps, communication, and other onboard equipment. Ships can hotel for several hours or several days. Hotelling emissions from ship auxiliary engines are significant contributors to particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines (diesel PM), California’s most significant toxic air contaminant. Diesel PM emissions are estimated to be responsible for about 70 percent of the total ambient air toxics risk in California. Communities adjacent to the ports are exposed to elevated cancer risk and other health impacts from these hotelling emissions. As indicated in a recent Air Resources Board (ARB or Board) risk analysis conducted for the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach, “Diesel Particulate Matter Exposure Assessment Study for the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach,” 20 percent of total diesel PM emissions at these ports comes from hotelling emissions. Other sources of diesel PM include emissions from ship transit and maneuvering, cargo-handling equipment, and rail and truck operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Crop & Livestock Report 2013
    VENTURA COUNTY’S Crop & Livestock Report 2013 Local and World Marketplace OFFICE OF THE Contents AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER 1 Agricultural Commissioner’s Letter AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER Henry S. Gonzales 2 Recapitulation & Index 3 Five Year Comparison CHIEF DEPUTY AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONER Rudy Martel 4 Ten Leading Crops for 2013 4 Other Million Dollar Crops DEPUTY AGRICULTURAL COMMISSIONERS Korinne Bell, Ryan Casey, 5 Fruit and Nut Crops Ellen Kragh 6 Vegetable Crops ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT 8 Ventura County Local and Rita Aguilera, Maribel Lemus, Bernice World Marketplace Muñoz, Sara Venegas, Luz Villavicencio 10 Nursery Stock SUPERVISING AGRICULTURAL 11 Cut Flowers INSPECTOR/BIOLOGISTS Blanca Enriquez-Pratt, Jamie Mastright, 12 Field Crops George Mendoza, Michael Otani 12 Livestock and Poultry AGRICULTURAL INSPECTOR/BIOLOGISTS 13 Apiary Production Lauren Balthazor, Justin Bertoline, Vanessa Cruz, Tim Fritch, Brady 13 Timber Gergovich, Freddi Herrmann, Jennifer 14 Sustainable Agriculture Le, Bridget Lux, Nanette Quayson, Christy Robinett, Jose Ruiz, Loveleen 15 Certified Farmers’ Markets Sandhu, Zamara Thibodeaux, Greta Varien, Carl Waite, Scott Wilson, 16 Story of the Avocado: Ventura David Wirta, Darrin Yant, Cristina County Born, Raised and Consumed Zamora, Erika Zapien INSECT DETECTION SPECIALISTS Sincerest thanks to staff members, both present and past, who contributed to this report. Special recognition goes to Brittnee Clifford Ball, Linda Bellamy, Carter for assisting in data collection and to Linda Bellamy and Andrew DuBridge,
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Local Coastal Program
    Port Hueneme General Plan Background Report Local Coastal Program 13 Local Coastal Program 13.1 Purpose The Local Coastal Program (LCP) is a planning document that includes land use plans, a zoning ordinance, zoning district maps, and other implementing actions in the coastal zone that meet the requirements of and implement the California Coastal Act (Public Resources Code Section 30108.6). The Coastal Act applies to the coastal zone, a strip along the California coast generally “extending seaward to the state’s outer limit of jurisdiction, including all offshore islands, and extending inland generally 1,000 yards from the mean high tide line of the sea” (Public Resources Code Section 30103). Development in the coastal zone requires a Coastal Development Permit (CDP). Once a city has an LCP certified by the Coastal Commission, the ability to grant CDPs is transferred from the Coastal Commission to the City. For an LCP to be certified by the Coastal Commission, it must include a Land Use Plan (LUP), policies, and an Implementation Plan (IP) that ensures the goals of the Coastal Act are being met. Because much of Port Hueneme is within the coastal zone, an LCP is required for the City to have the ability to issue CDPs within the City’s boundaries. See Figure 13.1 for the City’s Coastal Zone boundary. The existing LCP, adopted in 2006, prescribes the policies and procedures governing the use and development of land within the Coastal Zone. General Plan Background Report 1 Figure 13.1 Port Hueneme Coastal Zone Boundary and Land Uses 2 Port Hueneme General Plan Background Report Local Coastal Program 13.2 Relationship to Other Plans and Programs The Port Hueneme LCP connects to and overlaps with several other plans, ordinances, and programs adopted and implemented by the City.
    [Show full text]
  • Costs and Benefits of Shore Power at the Port of Shenzhen
    WHITE PAPER DECEMBER 2015 COSTS AND BENEFITS OF SHORE POWER AT THE PORT OF SHENZHEN Haifeng Wang, Ph.D., Xiaoli Mao, and Dan Rutherford, Ph.D. www.theicct.org [email protected] BEIJING | BERLIN | BRUSSELS | SAN FRANCISCO | WASHINGTON ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was commissioned by the China Environment Forum (CEF) at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars as part of its Choke Point: Port Cities initiative, funded by the Henry Luce Foundation. The authors thank Irene Kwan and Simon Ng for their technical support and Tim Leong for his critical review of the work. The authors also especially thank Shenzhen Human Settlements and Environmental Committee and the Port of Oakland for their review and recommendations for the report. ABOUT THE CHINA ENVIRONMENT FORUM (CEF) Since 1997, the China Environment Forum (CEF) has been the “go-to” resource for convening policy, business, research, and NGO practitioners on the most pressing energy, water, and pollution problems facing China. Through meetings, publications, and exchanges, they play a unique nonpartisan role in creating multistakeholder dialogues around China’s energy and environmental challenges, identifying new areas of collaboration. CEF’s work is frequently featured in mainstream media, including: The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, BBC News, The Guardian, Bloomberg Businessweek, and Foreign Policy. For additional information: International Council on Clean Transportation 1225 I Street NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005 USA [email protected]
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Stockton Stockton, California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report
    Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 Port of Stockton Stockton, California Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2012 Port of Stockton P.O. Box 2089 Stockton, CA 95201 Prepared by The Finance and Administration Department Stockton Port District Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Table of Contents Year Ended June 30, 2012 Introductory Section (unaudited): Letter of Transmittal i-iv GFOA Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting v List of Principal Officers vi Organizational Chart vii Aerial View of the East and West Complex viii-ix Financial Section: Independent Auditor's Report 1-2 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited Required Supplementary Information) 3-10 Basic Financial Statements: Balance Sheets 12 Statements of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets 13 Statements of Cash Flows 14-15 Notes to Financial Statements 16-39 Required Supplementary Information OPEB Plan Funding Progress 41 Pension Plan Funding Progress 41 Supplementary Information Unrestricted Cash and Investment Detail 43 Outstanding Construction in Progress Detail 44 Statistical Section - (Unaudited): Statistical Section Summary 45 Summary of Revenues, Expenses, and Changes in Net Assets - 10 years 46-47 Net Assets by Components - 10 years 48-49 Principal Customers - 2012 50 Principal Customers - 2012 - 2003 51-53 Summary of Revenues and Metric Revenue Tonnage Trends - 10 years 54-55 Computation of Legal Debt Margin - 10 years 56-57 Ratios of Outstanding
    [Show full text]
  • I-15 Corridor System Master Plan Update 2017
    CALIFORNIA NEVADA ARIZONA UTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN UPDATE 2017 MARCH 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) is a commerce, port authorities, departments of aviation, freight product of the hard work and commitment of each of the and passenger rail authorities, freight transportation services, I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and providers of public transportation services, environmental their dedicated staff. and natural resource agencies, and others. Individuals within the four states and beyond are investing Their efforts are a testament of outstanding partnership and their time and resources to keep this economic artery a true spirit of collaboration, without which this Master Plan of the West flowing. The Alliance partners come from could not have succeeded. state and local transportation agencies, local and interstate I-15 MOBILITY ALLIANCE PARTNERS American Magline Group City of Orem Authority Amtrak City of Provo Millard County Arizona Commerce Authority City of Rancho Cucamonga Mohave County Arizona Department of Transportation City of South Salt Lake Mountainland Association of Arizona Game and Fish Department City of St. George Governments Bear River Association of Governments Clark County Department of Aviation National Park Service - Lake Mead National Recreation Area BNSF Railway Clark County Public Works Nellis Air Force Base Box Elder County Community Planners Advisory Nevada Army National Guard Brookings Mountain West Committee on Transportation County
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Corridor System Master Plan
    MARCH 2012 CALIFORNIANEVADAARIZONAUTAH I-15 CORRIDOR SYSTEM MASTER PLAN MOVINGPEOPLE MOVINGGOODS Acknowledgements The I-15 Corridor System Master Plan (Master Plan) and the • City of Orem associated technical studies are products of the hard work and • City of Rancho Cucamonga commitment of each of the I-15 Mobility Alliance (Alliance) partner organizations and their dedicated staff. Their efforts are a • City of South Salt Lake testament of outstanding partnership and a true spirit of collabo- • City of St. George ration, without which this Master Plan could not have succeeded. • Clark County Department of Aviation Susan Martinovich, Director of the Nevada Department of Transportation (NDOT) and 2011 American Association of State • Clark County Public Works Highway Transportation Officials (AASHTO) President, served • County of San Bernardino as the Chair of the Alliance’s Executive Board and, through her agency, provided the initial funding for this effort. Without this • DesertXpress support, the creation of the Master Plan and Alliance would not • Economic Development Corporation of Utah have been possible. Her leadership and vision were an inspiration to all those participating in the Alliance. • El Dorado Holdings • Envision Utah I-15 Mobility Alliance Partners • Federal Highway Administration The I-15 Mobility Alliance partners that have participated in this • Federal Railroad Administration effort are listed below in alphabetical order. • Five County Association of Governments • American Magline Group • Freeway and Arterial System
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Cold Ironing at Mombasa Port
    World Maritime University The Maritime Commons: Digital Repository of the World Maritime University World Maritime University Dissertations Dissertations 11-4-2018 Ship-port interface: analysis of the cost-effectiveness of cold ironing at Mombasa Port Ronald Ssali Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations Part of the Energy Systems Commons, and the Transportation Commons Recommended Citation Ssali, Ronald, "Ship-port interface: analysis of the cost-effectiveness of cold ironing at Mombasa Port" (2018). World Maritime University Dissertations. 656. https://commons.wmu.se/all_dissertations/656 This Dissertation is brought to you courtesy of Maritime Commons. Open Access items may be downloaded for non-commercial, fair use academic purposes. No items may be hosted on another server or web site without express written permission from the World Maritime University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY Malmö, Sweden SHIP-PORT INTERFACE: ANALYSIS OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF COLD IRONING AT MOMBASA PORT By RONALD SSALI Uganda. A Dissertation Submitted to World Maritime University in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Award of the Degree Of MASTER OF SCIENCE In MARITIME AFFAIRS, (MARITIME ENERGY MANAGEMENT) 2018 Copyright Ronald Ssali, 2018. DECLARATION I certify that all the material in this dissertation that is not my own work has been identified, and that no material is included for which a degree has previously been conferred on me. The contents of this dissertation reflect my own personal views, and are not necessarily endorsed by the University. Signature: …………… ………… Date: 18th Sep 2018 Supervised by: Dr. Fabio Ballini (Ph.D.) Supervisor’s affiliation: Lecturer - Maritime Economist Maritime Energy Management Specialization Maritime Energy Research Group (MarEner) WORLD MARITIME UNIVERSITY ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I express my utmost appreciation to my supervisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Cold Ironing Study on Modern Ports, Implementation and Benefits Thriving for Worldwide Ports
    A Cold Ironing Study on Modern Ports, Implementation and Benefits Thriving for Worldwide Ports PAPOUTSOGLOU G. THEODOROS School of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering National Technical University of Athens 2012 School of Naval Architecture & Marine Engineering National Technical University of Athens 2012 Thesis PAPOUTSOGLOU G. THEODOROS A Cold Ironing Study on Modern Ports, Implementation and Benefits Thriving for Worldwide Ports Supervisor: HARILAOS N. PSARAFTIS Professor of Maritime Transport National Technical University of Athens Subject: Study of Cold ironing benefits applied on modern ports Key Words: Cold ironing, Alternative Marine Power, AMP, Onshore Power Supply, OPS, Shore side electricity, EEDI, SEEMP, IAPH toolbox, WPCI, NTUA, NAME NTUA [2] THEODOROS G. PAPOUTSOGLOU Acknowledgements For the help, encouragement and contribution during my thesis thanks to my Supervisor and Professor Harilaos N. Psaraftis. Also I express my thanks to all my friends and family supporting me during work. [3] A Cold Ironing Study on Modern Ports, Implementation and Benefits Thriving for Worldwide Ports ABSTRACT Cold ironing lately is receiving much attention and being promoted as a prime strategy for reducing air emission generated from global maritime industry. This study focuses on the key role of cold ironing ƚŽǁĂƌĚƐĂ͞'ƌĞĞŶĞƌŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůDĂƌŝƚŝŵĞŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJ͘͟ Although many different strategies are applied in modern worldwide ports, the concept of shore powering the ships while at berth is attracting much attention, with significant both financial and scientific sources being directed towards the adaptation / implementation of cold ironing technology. This report presents an in-depth analysis of cold ironing application in modern ports and the benefits in an environmental and financial point of view.
    [Show full text]
  • Cruise Committee Roster 1 SEP 2011
    American Association of Port Authorities CRC Cruise Committee as of September 1st, 2011Page 1 Mr. Peter Dailey Mr. Gary P. LaGrange, PPM Chairperson Vice Chairperson Deputy Director, Maritime President and CEO Port of San Francisco Port of New Orleans Pier 1 P.O. Box 60046 San Francisco, CA 94111 New Orleans, LA 70160-0046 Phone: (415) 274-0517 FAX: (415) 274-0528 Phone: (504) 528-3203 FAX: (504) 528-3397 Mr. Donald R. Allee Mr. Manuel Almira Corporate Member Corporate Member Executive Director and CEO Executive Director Mississippi State Port Authority at Gulfport Port of Palm Beach District P.O. Box 40 One East 11th Street, Suite 600 Gulfport, MS 39502-0040 Riviera Beach, FL 33419-4935 Phone: (228) 865-4300 FAX: (228) 865-4335 Phone: (561) 842-4201 FAX: (561) 842-4240 Ms. Martine Bélanger Mr. Will Berg Corporate Member Corporate Member Vice President - Business Development, Commercial Director of Marketing & Public Information Activities & Cruises Port of Hueneme/Oxnard Harbor District Québec Port Authority P.O. Box 608 150 Dalhousie Street Port Hueneme, CA 93044-0608 P.O. Box 80, Station Haute-Ville Phone: (805) 488-3677 FAX: (805) 488-2620 Québec, QC G1R 4M8 CANADA Phone: (418) 648-3640, x 1109 FAX: (418) 648-4160 Mr. Nicholas C. Billows Mr. Antonio Boemi Corporate Member Corporate Member Deputy Port Director, Sales and Marketing Vice President, Growth and Development Massachusetts Port Authority Montréal Port Authority Cruiseport Boston Port of Montreal Building One Harborside Drive, Suite 200S 2100 Pierre-DuPuy Ave., Wing 1 East Boston, MA 02128-2909 Montréal, QC H3C 3R5 Phone: (617) 946-4428 FAX: (617) 946-4466 CANADA Phone: (514) 283-6620 FAX: (514) 283-1858 Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Port of Stockton Embarks on Technology Upgrade
    PORTS hat happens when with such faraway nations as NorthSouth classified by the US Department a small river port in China, Japan, Trinidad, and GIS’s philosophy of Homeland Security as a – that different gets classified as Norway. Until very recently it members of Tier 1 port after September 11, a high-risk critical has focused on bulk and break the port are 2001, when the criticality and W most likely to infrastructure by a national bulk cargo, such as fertilizer, vulnerability of US ports was security risk model? And how rice, cement, sulfur, iron ore, collaborate and evaluated. Tier 1 ports receive participate in does a port in response to this and scrap metal, and now it has data sharing the majority of government assessment cope with the need begun to handle transshipped if they receive funding for strengthening their to rapidly ramp up its security containers as well. It is an benefit from resiliency to both attack and stance and implement a wide important economic “engine” to that activity, disaster, as they are perceived and that this variety of the latest technologies its region, and provides several then collectively to be particularly important to in an otherwise out-of-date advantages to shippers as it is benefits port the security and/or economy of technology environment? And located on the main Pacific Coast security – the US. This classification has how do geospatial technologies north-south rail and highway agreed with valid and logical reasoning, and the port’s own aid in accomplishing these goals corridors, while its much larger philosophy.
    [Show full text]
  • Bay Area Seaport Forecast
    2019-2050 Bay Area Seaport Forecast Revised Draft Final Prepared for SF Bay Conservation and Development Commission The Tioga Group ⬧ Hackett Associates April 30, 2020 Table of Contents NOTE TO REVIEWERS 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 3 Overview 3 Containerized Cargo 4 Ro-Ro (Neo-Bulk) Cargo 8 Dry Bulk Cargo 10 Other Cargo Types 12 Summary Findings 12 Available Terminal Expansion Sites 13 INTRODUCTION 16 Current Cargo Flows 16 RELEVANT ECONOMIC AND TRADE TRENDS 19 Economic Trends 19 Trade Trends 37 CONTAINERIZED FORECAST AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS 40 Containerized Cargo Forecast Review 40 Current Container Cargo Flows 47 Containerized Shipping Trends 50 Scenario Overview 72 Total Containerized Cargo Forecast 78 Container Terminal Capacity 83 Port of Oakland Container Terminals 85 Expansion Scenarios 88 Expansion Progression 91 Annual Capacity Comparisons 94 Monthly Peak Capacity Comparisons 98 Container Terminal Expansion Paths 100 Port of Oakland Container Terminal and Capacity Findings 101 Port of Oakland Berth Capacity 106 Ancillary Services Land Use 131 RO-RO CARGO FORECAST AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS 144 Ro-Ro (Neo-Bulk) Cargo Review 144 Current Ro-Ro Cargo Flows 144 Ro-Ro (Neo-bulk) Shipping Trends 146 Outlook 151 Scenario Overview 152 Ro-Ro Terminal Capacity 157 Ro-Ro Terminal Needs 161 i Ro-Ro Cargo Capacity Findings 163 DRY BULK CARGO FORECAST AND CAPACITY ANALYSIS 165 Dry Bulk Cargo Review 165 Forecast Commodity Flows 168 Dry Bulk Terminals 185 Capacity Estimate 190 LIQUID BULK CARGO 194 Liquid Bulk Cargo Review 194 BREAK-BULK CARGO 196 Break-Bulk
    [Show full text]