DOCSLIB.ORG

Testimony of Dr. Ajit Singh, Queens' College to the Devlin

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Testimony of Dr. Ajit Singh, Queens' College to the Devlin Appendix A: Testimony of Dr. Ajit Singh, Queens’ College to the Devlin Enquiry on the Sit-In in Cambridge University in February 1972 3 June 1972. Lord Devlin, High Steward of Cambridge University “Report on the Sit-in in February 1972 and its Consequences”, Cambridge University Reporter Wednesday, 14 February 1973, Vol CIII, Special No. 12; 84p. Background facts. When, where, the meetings immediately prior and leading up to the sit-in Lord Devlin took evidence in hearings and submissions on 1, 2 and 3 June in Cambridge. NB: Day One was 1 June. On Day Two, 2 June, in Speech and Evidence, p.41, Lord Devlin says: “Tere is one other possible witness in connec- tion with that incident and that is Dr Singh. Dr Singh was a member of the Faculty Board and who made the initial speech. I think I might ask Mr Whittaker to write to him or to contact him and to ask him whether © Te Editor(s) (if applicable) and Te Author(s), under exclusive license 339 to Springer Nature Switzerland AG, part of Springer Nature 2019 A. Saith, Ajit Singh of Cambridge and Chandigarh, Palgrave Studies in the History of Economic Tought, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12422-9 340 Appendix A: Testimony of Dr. Ajit Singh, Queens’ College … he may wish to give evidence or not, because he may be able to throw some light, again, on the connection between the two proceedings”. John Barnes and Robert Neild gave their testimonies on 3 June; Ajit comes later, #83, but overnight, Ajit seems to have prepared the detailed and complex document that follows — clearly something rubbed of from being around his father, the High Court judge. Jo recalls that Ajit was completed focussed and worked overnight to produce his written testimony, the high quality of which apparently was much appreciated by Lord Devlin. Ajit Singh’s Submission. 7 pages of typescript; in Proceedings of the Devlin Enquiry, Cambridge University Archives, Devlin Enquiry Report and Papers; GBR/0265/Devlin, 1972–1973. 3 June 1972. The Submission Background to the Economics Faculty Board’s Proposals for Examination Reform and the General Board’s Reaction to Tem Te Faculty Board of Economics has, for the last three years, been actively considering the question of improving methods of assessment in the Faculty. Te matter in all its aspects was frst considered in a Joint Staf–Student Committee (known as the Kaldor-Rivers-Moore Committee), of which I was a member, during the Lent and Easter Terms of 1969. Tis Committee submitted two interim reports, includ- ing an important and substantial one which contained statistical anal- ysis of the discrepancies between frst and second reader’s marks in the Tripos examinations. It also submitted, in 1970, a very full fnal report which made specifc recommendations for changes in the Faculty’s methods of assessment. Tis report and its recommendations were the subjects of long discussion over the next year and a half in open staf– student meetings of the Faculty, in the Faculty Board, at the Conference of Lecturers and in various subcommittees appointed by the Board. I took an active part in all these discussions. Appendix A: Testimony of Dr. Ajit Singh, Queens’ College … 341 Tese matters came to ahead in the Michaelmas Term of 1971, since there was, by then, a widespread feeling, both among junior members and among many senior members, that discussion had gone on long enough and that some reforms ought actually to be imple- mented as soon as possible. However, another important subcommit- tee was appointed during that term, consisting of Professor Reddaway (Chairman), Professor Kaldor and myself (with powers to co-opt) to report on the question of the possibility of a Part II examination by dis- sertations alone (see Faculty Board Minute 391/8, dated 8th November, 1971). In the event, this subcommittee worked very hard and produced a unanimous report which was accepted at a specially convened meeting of the Faculty Board held on 29 November 1971. (See Faculty Board Minute 392/3 dated 29th November 1971.) It was the general feeling at this meeting that every efort should be made to implement the reforms during the academic year 1972–1973, as envisaged in the detailed time- table given in the Reddaway report (Faculty Board document 392/3). With this end in view, it was felt that the matter should be pursued during the Christmas Vacation and “that a letter setting out the pro- posals in full, stating the reasons for the changes proposed, should be sent to the General Board of the Faculties in time for their meeting on 12th January” (Faculty Board Minute 392/3, dated 29th November 1971). A subcommittee consisting of the Chairman, the Secretary, Dr. Feinstein (or Dr. Heal) and myself was appointed to draw up this letter. We met during the vacation and Professor Stone (the Chairman) wrote on behalf of the Faculty Board on 23 December 1971 to the Secretary General of the Faculties setting out “the precise nature of our proposals and the intentions behind them”. Professor Stone’s letter also said that: “I am writing this letter to you in the vacation in the hope that it may be possible for the General Board to consider it when it meets again on 12th January and to let us know what further documentation will be required to implement these proposals”. I should also like to point out in this connection that this was not the frst time the General Board had heard of the matter. Te minutes of the Faculty Board meetings for the Michaelmas term (at almost every one of which meetings the question of examination reform had been discussed) were available to the General Board. I also helped to prepare 342 Appendix A: Testimony of Dr. Ajit Singh, Queens’ College … a briefng for Mr. R. F. Bennett, the General Board representative for Group II of the Faculties (there is, incidentally, no economist currently serving on that Board), so that he could speak to proposals concerning classing in Part I (See the enclosed letter dated 12 November 1971 from the Secretary of the Faculty Board of Economics to myself). It is in this context that one must view the General Board’s let- ter of 17 January 1972, which replies to Professor Stone’s letter of 23 December 1971. Many of us on the Faculty Board, particularly the younger members, were very much dismayed by the peremptory and dismissive tone of the letter and by its apparent practical implications (see below). Te General Board had not asked for any further documentation in support of our case, as was ofered in Professor Stone’s letter; nor did it invite any member of the Faculty Board of Economics to speak to these proposals at its meetings. Instead it fatly stated that it did not agree with some of our major proposals without giving adequate reasons or justifcation. I should like to stress here that these proposals were not refused because of practical difculties of implementation. For instance, a major proposal—the one concerning examination by dissertations alone—was ruled out in principle with the following comment: “… the Board consider an examination consisting entirely of dissertations to be inappropriate for undergraduates”. No justifcation was ofered for this assertion. It is not necessary here to go into a detailed analysis of the General Board’s letter; what is relevant is what we felt at the time to be its practical implications. Whatever the legal and constitutional status of the letter, it had two efective consequences. Firstly, it was quite clear to us on the Faculty Board that in view of the General Board’s opposi- tion, any possibility of the examination reform proposals coming into efect in the academic year 1972–1973 was virtually ruled out. Tis was naturally a source of great disappointment to many of us, and particularly to the junior members. Secondly, some senior members of the Faculty Board who had originally supported the proposals now felt that in view of the General Board’s frm opposition, the Faculty’s Appendix A: Testimony of Dr. Ajit Singh, Queens’ College … 343 proposals had very little chance of acceptance by the University as a whole, and that we should just accept the very limited reforms which were ofered. However, it was argued by myself and by a majority of the other members of the Board that, even though we recognized that the chances of our ultimate success were small, we should at least ask the General Board to give adequate reasons for its refusal of our pro- posal. In our view, nothing had been said in the General Board’s letter which ought to make us change our mind about the principles of our original proposals, over which there had already been a series of inev- itable compromises during the three years of discussion. (A perusal of the Faculty Board minute 394/3 dated 31st January 1972, as amended by minute 395/1 dated 14th February 1972, will give Lord Devlin some favour of the Faculty Board’s reactions to the General Board’s letter.) It has been argued by the General Board that in fact it has no ulti- mate power and that constitutionally speaking it is merely a screening device, and that the Faculty is free to go directly to the University as a whole over the head of the General Board. Although this is consti- tutionally correct, the realities of the situation are very diferent. Tere have been very few instances where, on issues of Tripos or examination reform, a Faculty Board’s proposals have been accepted by the Regent House in the face of the General Board’s opposition.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Influence of Kadambari Devi in Rabindranath Tagore's Paintings
    Journal of Fine Arts Volume 2, Issue 3, 2019, PP 10-12 ISSN 2637-5885 Influence of Kadambari Devi in Rabindranath Tagore’s Paintings Disha Mondal* M.A., English Literature, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan, West-Bengal, India *Corresponding Author: Disha Mondal, M.A., English Literature, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan, West-Bengal, India, Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT Rabindranath Tagore began painting relatively late in his career when he was in his sixties. Nevertheless he produced thousands of works and was the first Indian artist to exhibit his works across Europe, Russia and the United States in 1930. His painting style was very individual, characterized by simple bold forms and a rhythmic quality, and later served to inspire many modern Indian artists. Tagore painted landscapes, animal figures and human faces. The human faces are a prominent constant in his artistic works. His painted faces depict various moods: fear, romantic, melancholy and many more to say. This paper intends to analyse who were these women who inspired Tagore to produce such paintings. Key Words: women, veil, darkness, emotion “I know not who paints the pictures on memory’s very busy. Now Holidays have begun. I am canvas; but whoever he may be what he is painting thinking of just to sit in a corner and paint. I don’t are pictures; by which I mean that he is not there feel like using my pen…” We can realize that with his brush simply to make a faithful copy of all Rabindranath was engrossed in painting so much that is happening.” Rabindranath Tagore Jivan that he even did not wish to write then.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dinner Tribute to Joseph A. Pechman
    This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu A Dinner Tribute to Joseph A. Pechman "In his generation of Washington intellectuals - the people who make a difference not because of their offices or their connections, but because of the force of their writing and their argument- none had more influence than Mr. Pechman. None used it with greater generosity or a surer sense of the public interest" I The Washington Post Wednesday, August 23, 1989 The Brookings Institution 1775 Massachusetts Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036-2188 202/797-6220 Page 1 of 29 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu A Dinner Tribute to Joseph A. Pechman hosted by The Brookings Institution Tuesday, April 24, 1990 6:30 p.rn. The Hyatt Regency Hotel Capitol Hill 400 New Jersey Avenue, N.W. Washington District of Columbia Page 2 of 29 This document is from the collections at the Dole Archives, University of Kansas http://dolearchives.ku.edu Joseph A. Pechman, one of America's most influential economists and leading theoretician on tax policy, was Director of the Economic Studies Program at The Brookings lnstitution for more than 20 years. At his death, he was Senior Fellow Emeritus in Economic Studies. Joe Pechman came to Brookings in 1960 after serving on the staff of the Council of Economic Advisers, the Committee for Economic Development, and the Office of Price Administration. As Director of Economic Studies from 1962 to 1983, he managed programs in the study of government finance and supervised research in social economics and regulatory policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Pamphlets Email: [email protected] 42 AMIYA CHAKRAVARTY AMIYA CHAKRAVARTY 3 a Saint at Work a Saint at Work
    AMIYA CHAKRAVARTY A Saint at Work William Penn Lecture 1950 WILLIAM PENN LECTURE, 1950 A Saint at Work A View of Gandhi’s Work and Message Delivered at Race Street Meeting House Philadelphia by Amiya Chakravarty Published by The Book Committee Religious Society of Friends Philadelphia and Vicinity 302 Arch Street, Philadelphia 2 AMIYA CHAKRAVARTY AMIYA CHAKRAVARTY 43 A Saint at Work A Saint at Work as to a common bereavement. If this spirit remains with us, then indeed Gandhiji’s suffering will not have been in vain; like the death and suffering of other innocent men, his testimony will be a part of our future. Gandhiji will perhaps succeed with us in his death though we failed him in his life. In a last gesture of farewell, a friend of man folded his hands, and greeted us. And then when his body was carried away to the room where many of us had seen him at work, in happy conversation and full of affectionate joy, he was quiet and still. Perfect peace lay on him, as the candlelight Dedicated in friendship to played on his face and hymns were sung in God’s name, the Blanche And William Stuart Nelson hymns that he had loved. That is the picture of a heroic Howard University saint who conquered. Published 1950 by Philadelphia Yearly Meeting Republished electronically © 2007 by Quaker Heron Press http://www.quaker.org/pamphlets email: [email protected] 42 AMIYA CHAKRAVARTY AMIYA CHAKRAVARTY 3 A Saint at Work A Saint at Work a challenge – a challenge which we cannot ignore.
    [Show full text]
  • Recessions and Recoveries
    Mark A. Wynne Nathan S. Balke Senior Economist Assistant Professor of Economics Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Southern Methodist University and Research Associate Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Recessions and Recoveries he U.S. economy entered recession in July the behavior of groups of leading, coincident, and T 1990 and began to recover, many analysts lagging indicators in the first seven months of six believe, in April or May 1991. Since then, the recoveries (the earliest being that following the economy has grown at a pace so sluggish as to be trough in July 1924, the latest being that following indistinguishable, in some ways, from continued the trough in August 1954, since revised to May recession. However, as early as spring 1991, several 1954) and tentatively concluded that “recoveries observers were expressing the opinion that the in output, employment, and profits have usually recovery from the 1990–91 recession would not been faster after severe depressions than after be particularly robust because the recession itself mild contractions” (p. 88). Moore (1965) contains was not particularly severe. For example, in Busi- a restatement of the finding that severe contractions ness Week in June 1991, Alan Blinder argued, tend to be followed by strong expansions, and “Shallow recessions are followed by weak recov- Bry and Boschan (1971) present further evidence eries for a simple reason: An economy that has on this proposition, focusing on growth in non- not fallen far has little catching up to do. And agricultural employment. catch-up
    [Show full text]
  • From Social Control to Financial Economics: the Linked Ecologies of Economics and Business in Twentieth Century America
    Theor Soc (2013) 42:121–159 DOI 10.1007/s11186-012-9187-3 From social control to financial economics: the linked ecologies of economics and business in twentieth century America Marion Fourcade & Rakesh Khurana Published online: 27 February 2013 # Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013 Abstract This article draws on historical material to examine the co-evolution of economic science and business education over the course of the twentieth century, showing that fields evolve not only through internal struggles but also through struggles taking place in adjacent fields. More specifically, we argue that the scientific strategies of business schools played an essential—if largely invisible and poorly understood—role in major transformations in the organization and substantive direc- tion of social-scientific knowledge, and specifically economic knowledge, in twenti- eth century America. We use the Wharton School as an illustration of the earliest trends and dilemmas (ca. 1900–1930), when business schools found themselves caught between their business connections and their striving for moral legitimacy in higher education. Next, we look at the creation of the Carnegie Tech Graduate School of Industrial Administration after World War II. This episode illustrates the increas- ingly successful claims of social scientists, backed by philanthropic foundations, on business education and the growing appeal of “scientific” approaches to decision- making and management. Finally, we argue that the rise of the Graduate School of Business at the University of Chicago from the 1960s onwards (and its closely related cousin at the University of Rochester) marks the decisive ascendancy of economics, and particularly financial economics, in business education over the other behavioral M.
    [Show full text]
  • Amartya Sen - Great Indian Economist
    ISSN No. : 2394-0344 REMARKING : VOL-1 * ISSUE-7*December-2014 Amartya Sen - Great Indian Economist Abstract Success lives in human mind. India is country in which 125 Crores People live and when we read history, it is full of great man. When the Indian History rewritten, the name of great economist Amartya sen will be always be there. There is hardly any person in the world who can fully analyze the work of this economist, yet I have done a little try to know about his life and some of his well known works. This paper is an attempt to describe some of key-facts about Amartya sen. Keywords: Country, Empowerment, Democracy Introduction Amartya sen is an Indian economist and a Nobel Leureate. Sen was born in Shantiniketan, West Bengal, India to Ashutosh Sen and his wife Amita, 3 November, 1933. Sen‟s family was originally from Wari, Dhaka in present- day Bangladesh. His father Ashutosh Sen was a Professor of Chemistry at Dhaka University who moved with his family to West Bengal during the Partition of India and become chairman of the West Bengal public service commission. A. Sen began his high school education at st. Gregory‟s school in Dhaka in 1941. After moved he studied at Visva- Bharti University school and then Presidency College, Kolkata, where he earned a first class first in his B.A. in economics. The same year 1953, he moved to Trinity College, Cambridge, where he earned a first class M.A. in 1956. After Sen completed his Tripos examination and enrolled for PH.D in economics Trinity College, Cambridge.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Economic Growth in Postwar America 1
    More The Politics of Economic Growth in Postwar America ROBERT M. COLLINS 1 2000 3 Oxford New York Athens Auckland Bangkok Bogotá Buenos Aires Calcutta Cape Town Chennai Dar es Salaam Delhi Florence Hong Kong Istanbul Karachi Kuala Lumpur Madrid Melbourne Mexico City Mumbai Nairobi Paris São Paulo Singapore Taipei Tokyo Toronto Warsaw and associated companies in Berlin Ibadan Copyright © 2000 Published by Oxford All rights reserved. No by Robert M. University Press, Inc. part of this publication Collins 198 Madison Avenue, may be reproduced, New York, New York stored in a retrieval 10016. system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, Oxford is a registered mechanical, trademark of Oxford photocopying, recording, University Press. or otherwise, without the prior permission of Oxford University Press. Library of Congress Cataloging–in–Publication Data Collins, Robert M. More : the politics of economic growth in postwar America / Robert M. Collins. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0–19–504646–3 1. Wealth—United States—History—20th century. 2. United States—Economic policy. 3. United States—Economic conditions—1945–. 4. Liberalism—United States— History—20th Century. 5. National characteristics, American. I. Title. HC110.W4C65 2000 338.973—dc21 99–022524 Design by Adam B. Bohannon 987654321 Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper For My Parents Contents Preface ix Acknowledgments xiii Prologue: The Ambiguity of New Deal Economics 1 1 > The Emergence of Economic Growthmanship 17 2 > The Ascendancy of Growth Liberalism 40 3 > Growth Liberalism Comes a Cropper, 1968 68 4 > Richard Nixon’s Whig Growthmanship 98 5 > The Retreat from Growth in the 1970s 132 6 > The Reagan Revolution and Antistatist Growthmanship 166 7 > Slow Drilling in Hard Boards 214 Conclusion 233 Notes 241 Index 285 Preface bit of personal serendipity nearly three decades ago inspired this A book.
    [Show full text]
  • William Brian Reddaway 1913–2002
    BRIAN REDDAWAY William Brian Reddaway 1913–2002 I PROFESSOR W. B. R EDDAWAY, invariably known to friends and colleagues as Brian Reddaway, was an exceptional economist who had a huge influ- ence on how economics in Cambridge has been taught and researched. He held leadership positions in the Faculty of Economics and Politics at Cambridge for twenty-five years, between 1955 and 1980. For nearly the first fifteen years he was Director of the Department of Applied Economics (DAE), succeeding Sir Richard Stone, the founding Director. The DAE was established after the Second World War on the initiative of J. M. Keynes. It was set up as the research arm of the Faculty of Economics and Politics, providing facilities for teaching staff to carry out applied economic and social investigations. In 1969, almost at the end of his tenure as DAE Director, Reddaway was elected to succeed James Meade in the Chair of Political Economy, the senior chair in economics in Cambridge. Reddaway held this chair until 1980, when he formally retired. He continued his association with the Faculty for many years after this, doing occasional lecture courses, or one-off lectures: he posi- tively loved lecturing on applied economic subjects and helping younger colleagues with their research. As is the custom in Cambridge’s collegiate university structure, in addi- tion to his successive university posts in the Faculty, which began in 1939 on his appointment as University Lecturer, he held a Fellowship at Clare College for sixty-four years (1938 to 2002). He took a very active part in college life, including college teaching and helping to manage the college’s Proceedings of the British Academy, 138, 285–306.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunger and Entitlements
    RESEARCH FOR ACTION HUNGER AND ENTITLEMENTS AMARTYA SEN WORLD INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS RESEARCH UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY WORLD INSTITUTE FOR DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS RESEARCH Lal Jayawardena, Director The Board of WIDER: Saburo Okita, Chairman Pentti Kouri Abdlatif Y. Al-Hamad Carmen Miro Bernard Chidzero I. G. Patel Mahbub ul Haq Heitor Gurgulino Albert O. Hirschman de Souza (ex officio) Lal Jayawardena (ex officio) Janez Stanovnik Reimut Jochimsen WIDER was established in 1984 and started work in Helsinki in the spring of 1985. The principal purpose of the Institute is to help identify and meet the need fur policy-oriented socio-economic research on pressing global and development prob- lems and their inter-relationships. The establishment and location of WIDER in Helsinki have been made possible by a generous financial contribution from the Government of Finland. The work of WIDER is carried out by staff researchers and visiting scholars and through networks of collaborating institutions and scholars in various par's of the world. WIDER's research projects are grouped into three main themes: I Hunger and poverty - the poorest billion II Money, finance and trade - reform for world development III Development and technological transformation - the management of change WIDER seeks to involve policy makers from developing countries in its research efforts and to draw specific policy lessons from the research results. The Institute continues to build up its research capacity in Helsinki and to develop closer contacts with other research institutions around the world. In addition to its scholarly publications, WIDER issues short, non-technical reports aimed at policy makers and their advisers in both developed and developing countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Sessions for Friday, April 29
    Sessions for Friday, April 29 Friday, 08:00 AM - 09:30 AM Friday, 08:00 AM - 09:30 AM, Tuscan 1 Track: HOM, 1 Chair: Roberto Revetria 1 Session: Systems Dynamics in Healthcare 020-0252 Strategy Deployment in UK Healthcare Shulian Zhang, University of Manchester, United Kingdom Claire Moxham, University of Manchester, United Kingdom David Bamford, University of Manchester, United Kingdom Ben Dehe, University of Manchester, United Kingdom April 2009 was an important period for all National Health Service (NHS) Community Health Services (CHS) organisations as they were formally separated from the commissioning service in the Primary Care Trust (PCT). This had many implications, including the need to establish individual board, develop independent strategy, and set-up autonomous governance. The host organisation was keen to investigate the effectiveness of the current strategy deployment (SD) process and subsequently identify areas for improvement. Our investigation looked into adapting strategy deployment systems such as the Closed-Loop Management Systems (Kaplan and Norton 2008) at NHS CHS organisations which can facilitate organisational needs in the area of strategy deployment. As human capital with the suitable skills is required for any successful implementation of a management system, the researchers expanded the scope by including an assessment of the organisation’sreadiness for adapting formal strategy deployment systems in terms of management skills levels. 020-0357 A Systems Dynamics General Model for Supporting Transition to Lean Healthcare Roberto Revetria, University of Genoa, Italy Lean Healthcare, Kaizen and Six Sigma are rapidly transforming healthcare operations from 'new ideas' to a 'way of life.' At the same time, while the concepts of Lean are fairly straightforward, applying the tools to daily work can be counter-intuitive and thus require a credible model to be effectively applied.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 3, September 2015
    Econ Journal Watch Scholarly Comments on Academic Economics Volume 12, Issue 3, September 2015 COMMENTS Education Premiums in Cambodia: Dummy Variables Revisited and Recent Data John Humphreys 339–345 CHARACTER ISSUES Why Weren’t Left Economists More Opposed and More Vocal on the Export- Import Bank? Veronique de Rugy, Ryan Daza, and Daniel B. Klein 346–359 Ideology Über Alles? Economics Bloggers on Uber, Lyft, and Other Transportation Network Companies Jeremy Horpedahl 360–374 SYMPOSIUM CLASSICAL LIBERALISM IN ECON, BY COUNTRY (PART II) Venezuela: Without Liberals, There Is No Liberalism Hugo J. Faria and Leonor Filardo 375–399 Classical Liberalism and Modern Political Economy in Denmark Peter Kurrild-Klitgaard 400–431 Liberalism in India G. P. Manish, Shruti Rajagopalan, Daniel Sutter, and Lawrence H. White 432–459 Classical Liberalism in Guatemala Andrés Marroquín and Fritz Thomas 460–478 WATCHPAD Of Its Own Accord: Adam Smith on the Export-Import Bank Daniel B. Klein 479–487 Discuss this article at Journaltalk: http://journaltalk.net/articles/5891 ECON JOURNAL WATCH 12(3) September 2015: 339–345 Education Premiums in Cambodia: Dummy Variables Revisited and Recent Data John Humphreys1 LINK TO ABSTRACT In their 2010 Asian Economic Journal paper, Ashish Lall and Chris Sakellariou made a valuable contribution to the understanding of education in Cambodia. Their paper represents the most robust analysis of the Cambodian education premium yet published, reporting premiums for men and women from three different time periods (1997, 2004, 2007), including a series of control variables in their regressions, and using both OLS and IV methodology.2 Following a convention of education economics, Lall and Sakellariou (2010) use a variation of the standard Mincer model (see Heckman et al.
    [Show full text]
  • THE RECORD NEWS ======The Journal of the ‘Society of Indian Record Collectors’ ------ISSN 0971-7942 Volume: Annual - TRN 2011 ------S.I.R.C
    THE RECORD NEWS ============================================================= The journal of the ‘Society of Indian Record Collectors’ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ISSN 0971-7942 Volume: Annual - TRN 2011 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ S.I.R.C. Units: Mumbai, Pune, Solapur, Nanded and Amravati ============================================================= Feature Articles Music of Mughal-e-Azam. Bai, Begum, Dasi, Devi and Jan’s on gramophone records, Spiritual message of Gandhiji, Lyricist Gandhiji, Parlophon records in Sri Lanka, The First playback singer in Malayalam Films 1 ‘The Record News’ Annual magazine of ‘Society of Indian Record Collectors’ [SIRC] {Established: 1990} -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- President Narayan Mulani Hon. Secretary Suresh Chandvankar Hon. Treasurer Krishnaraj Merchant ==================================================== Patron Member: Mr. Michael S. Kinnear, Australia -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Honorary Members V. A. K. Ranga Rao, Chennai Harmandir Singh Hamraz, Kanpur -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Membership Fee: [Inclusive of the journal subscription] Annual Membership Rs. 1,000 Overseas US $ 100 Life Membership Rs. 10,000 Overseas US $ 1,000 Annual term: July to June Members joining anytime during the year [July-June] pay the full
    [Show full text]