Full Page Photo
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ELR SCORING APPROACH CRITERIA SCORE SCORING GUIDANCE Quality of existing portfolio and internal environment 1 Site score 1 if significant / complicated clearance & new build required 2 Site score 2 if some site clearance & new build required 3 Site score 3 if no buildings on site and new build required Site score 4 if existing buildings can be re-used for employment with some 4 refurbishment / upgrading required Site score 5 if existing buildings can be re-used for employment with minor 5 or no clearance / refurbishment NOTE To be assessed initially desk based and confirmed through site visit. Site score 1 if surrounding environment has negative impact on Quality of the wider environment 1 commercial appeal of the site and no mitigation possible Site score 2 if surrounding environment has negative impact on (i.e. impact of the wider environment on development potential) 2 commercial appeal of the site and mitigation considered possible 3 Site score 3 if surrounding environment considered neutral Site score 4 if surrounding environment has minimal positive impact on 4 commercial appeal of the site Site score 5 if surrounding environment has major positive impact on 5 commercial appeal of the site To be scored initially desk based referencing #13, 14, 15, & 18 of ERYC NOTE assessment ; mainly to be determined by site visit Strategic access 1 Site score of 1 if site only poor local accessibility 2 Site score of 2 if site has good local accessibility (e.g. B road) 3 Site score of 3 if site has good sub-regional accessibility (e.g. A road) 4 Site score of 4 if site has good regional accessibility (e.g. motorway) 5 Site score of 5 if site has good national / international accessibility To be scored initially desk based using google - motorway classed as regional, and through referencing #25 & 26 of ERYC assessment. Site visit to confirm ease of access - the site may have proximity to a key road, but is it easy to access? e.g, through a residential area is not good access. Important to note potential for waterways / rail connectivity. Where access to a site is unachieveable - e.g. due to a private road, then NOTE this will count as a physical constraint below. Market conditions / perception and demand 1 Site score 1 if no evidence of market activity on site or in the area 2 Site score 3 if no evidence of market activity on the site but evidence in the 3 area (major) 4 5 Site score 5 if site is being clearly marketed To be completed based on commercial market assessment and NOTE perceptions from site visit. Ownership and user constraints on development / redevelopment 1 Site score 1 if in multiple ownership and unwilling 2 Site score 2 if single owner and unwilling 3 Site score 3 if multiple owners and willing 4 Site score 4 if single owner and willing 5 Site score 5 if in public ownership To be scored initially desk based referencing #32 of ERYC assessment plus CG list on land bids. If not known, site visits will be used to make a guess as to ownership (with clarifications as to assumptions made on each NOTE the detailed assessment for each site). Site development constraints [undeveloped sites only] 1 Site score 1 if multiple significant development constraints PHYSICAL 2 Site score 2 if individual significant development constraint 3 Site score 3 if multiple but not significant development constraints 4 Site score 4 if individual not significant development constraint 5 Site score 5 if no development constraints Initial desk based assessment referencing #2, 3, 4, 8 , 10 , 11, 12, 17, 19, 24, 25 & 31 of ERYC assessment. When assessing, consideration should be given as to whether constraints are on site or adjacent / significant enough to be relevant to development on the site. Site access (direct access to the site, is it in place? Is it difficult? Would it be difficult to fix it?) and topography need to be captured through site visits / #25 above. FOR FLOOD ZONE 3A - TREAT AS INSIGNIFICANT OR SIGNIFICANT DEPENDING ON COLOUR ATRIBUTED BY ERYC ASSESSMENT - RED NOTE = SIGNIFICANT, ORANGE = INSIGNIFICANT Site development constraints [undeveloped sites only] 1 Site score 1 if multiple significant development constraints DETERMINED BY POLICY - I.E. AGAINST LOSS OF BEST & VERSATILE AGRICULTURAL LAND, AGAINST CO-LOCATING INCOMPATIBLE USES, AGAINST COALESENCE OF SETTLEMENTS ETC. 2 Site score 2 if individual significant development constraint 3 Site score 3 if multiple but not significant development constraints 4 Site score 4 if individual not significant development constraint 5 Site score 5 if no development constraints Initial desk based assessment referencing #1, 9, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 20, 22 NOTE & 27 of ERYC assessment; site visit to add any clarifications. Site score 1 if accessibility is very poor (no public transport provision noted Accessibility 1 to the site and/or no population within walking / cycling distance) Site score 2 if accessibility is poor (limited / poor quality public transport provision (limited mode choice / regularity) and/or a limited population 2 within walking / cycling distance) Site score 3 if some accessibility (some public transport provision and/or a 3 population within walking / cycling distance) Site score 4 if good accessibility (good public transport provision (mode choice or regularity) and/or a good size population within walking / cycling 4 distance) Site score 5 if very good accessibility (very good public transport provision (choice and regularity) and/or a very good size population within walking / 5 cycling distance) To be scored desk based referencing #6 & 7 of the ERYC assessment; site NOTE visit to add any clarifications. Outside of urban area, Greenfield; Outside of urban area Partial Sequential test and brownfield / greenfield 1 Greenfield/brownfield majority Greenfield Outside of urban area brownfield; Outside of urban area Partial 2 Greenfield/brownfield majority brownfield Edge of urban area Greenfield; Edge of urban area Partial 3 Greenfield/brownfield majority Greenfield Edge of urban area, brownfield; Edge of urban area Partial 4 Greenfield/brownfield majority brownfield; OR within urban area, Greenfield 5 Within urban area, brownfield To be scored desk based referencing #5 of the ERYC assessment; site visit to add any clarifications. NOT TO BE BASED SOLELY ON CONSIDERATION OF DEVELOPMENT LIMITS, EDGE OF URBAN AREA CAN INCLUDE CLOSE TO URBAN NOTE AREA Site score 1 if employment use would directly conflict with an existing or emerging regeneration strategy, or have a significant detrimental impact on Social and regeneration policy 1 a deprived area. No satisfactory mitigation measures possible. Site score 2 if employment use may conflict with an existing or emerging regeneration strategy, or have a detrimental impact on a deprived area. 2 Any significant impacts can be mitigated. Site score 3 if employment use would not affect the aims of a recognised 3 regeneration strategy / plan, would not provide a benefit to a deprived area. Site score 4 if employment use of the site would contribute to achieving the aims of a recognised regeneration strategy / plan, and would have an 4 identifiable benefit for a deprived area. Site score 5 if employment use of the site would significantly help achieve the aims of a recognised regeneration strategy / plan and would have a 5 significant benefit for the most deprived areas. NOTE To be scored desk based referencing #28 & 29 of ERYC assessment. Site score 1 if not allocated for employment uses in existing policy and has Other policy considerations 1 existing allocation or permission for non employment use Site score 2 if not allocated for employment uses in existing policy and no 2 permission for emplyment use Site score 3 if not allocated for employment uses in existing policy and 3 expired permission for employment use Site score 4 if allocated for employment uses in existing policy or current 4 permission for employment use Site score 5 if allocated for employment uses in existing policy and 5 permission in place for employment use To be scored desk based referencing ELMR and Draft Allocations (assumed informed by #33 of ERYC assessment). WHERE ASSESSMENTS STATE UNALLOCATED THIS MEANS NOT ALLOCATED FOR EMPLOYMENT USES, RATHER THAN UNALLOCATED COMPLETELY. A SITE MAY HAVE A PROTECTIVE DESIGNATION SUCH AS AREA OF HIGH LANDSCAPE VALUE BUT THIS HAS NOT BEEN TREATED AS A NEGATIVE IN THE CONTEXT OF THIS CRITERIA AS SUCH PROTECTIVE DESIGNATIONS ARE NOTE COVERED IN RELATION TO PHYSICAL AND POLICY CONSTRAINTS. Total Score (shown as a Current planning range for ELMR Ref in current Ref in Draft Local Remaining in Land supply at October permission on part or multiple SiteID Local Plan Plan Settlement Name Address ELMR2012 2013 all* FEA Market Segment Investment Potential B1a B1b B1c B2 B8 sites) Status in Draft Local Plan GOOLE & SELBY FEA 04/06671/STOUTE & 06/08627/STOUTE & 08/01720/STPLFE 27 E2(a) & (c) GOO30 Goole Land South of Rawcliffe Road/West of industrial estate 62.00 63.40 (Pending Decision) Goole & Selby General Industrial / Business Area International / National x x x x x 43 Employment allocation 30 E10 HOW21 Howden North East of the A614 7.82 7.82 02/02846/OUT Goole & Selby General Industrial / Business Area National / Regional x x x x x 40 Employment allocation Newport / North Cave, 07/02183/STOUT & 33 E8 NEW17 M62, J38 North of B1230 7.48 7.48 13/00771/STREM Goole & Selby General Industrial / Business Area National / Regional x x x x x 39 De-allocated 28 E6 ~ Holme on Spalding Moor South of Skiff Lane 6.80 6.80 N Goole & Selby General Industrial