DOCSLIB.ORG

PARASITIC MIRATIVITY of ENGLISH USE in COLIN TREVORROWS MOVIE “JURASSIC WORLD” Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of Th

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

PARASITIC MIRATIVITY OF ENGLISH USE IN COLIN TREVORROWS MOVIE “JURASSIC WORLD” Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Humaniora in English and Literature Department of Faculty of Adab and Humanities of UIN Alauddin Makassar By MUJI RETNO Reg. No. 40300111080 ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT ADAB AND HUMANITIES FACULTY ALAUDDIN STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MAKASSAR 2016 PARASITIC MIRATIVITY OF ENGLISH USE IN COLIN TREVORROW’S MOVIE “JURASSIC WORLD” Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Sarjana Humaniora in English and Literature Department of Faculty of Adab and Humanities of UIN Alauddin Makassar By MUJI RETNO Reg. No. 40300111080 ENGLISH AND LITERATURE DEPARTMENT ADAB AND HUMANITIES FACULTY ALAUDDIN STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITY MAKASSAR 2016 i MOTTO “EDUCATION IS WHAT REMAINS AFTER ONE HAS FORGOTTEN WHAT ONE HAS LEARNED IN SCHOOL.” (Albert Eistein) “EDUCATION IS A PROGRESSIVE DISCOVERY OF OUR OWN IGNORENCE.” (Charlie Chaplin) “EVERY THE LAST STEP INEVITABLY HAS THE FIRST STEP” (Muji Retno) ii ACKNOWLEDGE All praises to Allah who has blessed, guided and given the health to the researcherduring writing this thesis. Then, the researcherr would like to send invocation and peace to Prophet Muhammad SAW peace be upon him, who has guided the people from the bad condition to the better life. The researcher realizes that in writing and finishing this thesis, there are many people that have provided their suggestion, advice, help and motivation. Therefore, the researcher would like to express thanks and highest appreciation to all of them. For the first, the researcher gives special gratitude to her parents, Masir Hadis and Jumariah Yaha who have given their loves, cares, supports and prayers in every single time. Then, the researcher gives thanks to her brotherHeldy Jusi S.Si., that have motivated and supported the researcher. Secondly, the greatest thanks to the rector of Alauddin State Islamic University of Makassar, Prof. Dr. Musafir Pababbari, M.Si., the dean of Adab and Humanities Faculty, Dr. H. Barsihannor, M.Ag., all the vices of dean of Adab and Humanities Faculty, Dr. H. Abd. Rachman R., M.Ag., Dr. Hj. Syamzan Syukur, M.Ag., and Dr.Abd. Muin, M.Hum., the head and secretary of English and Literature Department, Muhammad Nur Akbar Rasyid, M.Pd., M.Ed., Ph.D., and Syahruni Djunaid S.S., M.Pd., for their support, suggestion, help and administrative support. vii Thirdly, the researcher’s gratitude due to her first and second supervisors, Dr. Abd. Muin, M.Hum. and FaidahYusuf, S.S., M.Pd.,for their guidance, support, advices and their precious time during writing this thesis. Furthermore, the researcher would like to express thank to her first examinerSyahruni Djunaid, S.S., M.Pd. and second examiner Nasrum Marjuni, S.Pd., M.A., for their guidance, correction, support and advices. Besides that the researcher does not forget to say a lot of thanks to all the lecturers of English and Literature Department Serliah Nur, S.Pd, M.Hum., M.Ed.,Sardian Maharani Asnur, S.Pd., M.Pd., Dr. Hj. Nur Emmiyati, M.Pd., Nur Rachma Isnaeni Hamka, S.Pd., M.Pd., Muhammad Taufik, S.S., M.Hum., A. Kamariah, S.Pd., M.Pd. for their patience in sharing knowledge to the research during academic years. Next, the researcher gives the deep appreciation and sincere to heruncle, aunts, and cousins Rahmat Latif SH., Ayu Subaedah Yaha, Naning Widya Astuti SH., Dra. Nuraeni Yaha,Juwani Pratiwi Utami SE.,Tanti Rahmawni., Keihan Rahmat., for their support and prayer. Besides that, the deepest appreciation individually and collectively thanks to students of English and Literature Department academic year 2011,specially, to her friends in AG. 3 and 4 for the togetherness that the researcher passed in university. Furthermore, for dearest friends that always give support and help during writing this thesis,Mar’atun Mardiyah, Rahmaniar Baharuddin, Sulistriani, Ayuni Amaliah, Rahmi Amaliah, Jaitun, Indriani, Nur Aliza, Aryana Nurul Qarimah, Awaluddin, Baso Muammar, Sadaruddin Kahar, Zul Janwar, Hawani, Budiarto viii Lataf,Kurniawan.P, Andy Dandi Arsyadi Mirdad, Andi Tenri Padang, Nur Muttaqin, Muhammad Muflih Mappaujungand all the friends that cannot be mentioned one by one. The last but not least, the greatest thanks to Organization of Western English (OWL), Eliots Letters and Cambridge English College (CEC) Makassar for the experience, knowledge, brotherhood, support and advice. Finally, may Allah reward the good things to the researcher.The researcher realizes that this thesis is still far from being perfect but researcher has tried to do her best. Makassar, February25th 2016 Muji Retno ix TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages COVER PAGE ............................................................................................................ i MOTTO ...................................................................................................................... ii PERNYATAAN KEASLIAN SKRIPSI ................................................................. iii PERSETUJUAN PEMBIMBING ........................................................................... iv APPROVAL SHEET ................................................................................................. v PENGESAHAN SKRIPSI ....................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGE .................................................................................................. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS ..........................................................................................x LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................. xii ABSTRACT .............................................................................................................. xv CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ............................................................................. 1 A. Background ...................................................................................................... 1 B. Problem Statements ......................................................................................... 4 C. Objective of the Research ................................................................................ 4 D. Significance of Research ................................................................................. 4 E. Scope of the Research ...................................................................................... 5 CHAPTER II: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ..................................... 6 A. Previous Findings ............................................................................................ 6 B. What’s Mirativity ............................................................................................ 8 x C. The Characterizes of Mirativty ...................................................................... 12 D. Evidentiality ………………………………………………………………... 14 E. Epistemic Modality ………………………………………………………… 16 F. Parasitic and Non-Parasitic Mirativity …………………………………...… 19 G. Synopsis of “Jurassic World” Movie …………………………………….… 30 H. Biography of Colin Trevorrow …………………………………………….. 31 CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY OF THE RESEARCH ................................ 32 A. Method of the Research ……………............................................................ 32 B. Population and Sample ................................................................................. 32 C. Instrument of the Research ........................................................................... 33 D. Procedures of Collecting Data ...................................................................... 33 E. Technique of Data Analysis .......................................................................... 34 CHAPTER IV: FINDING AND DISCUSSION .................................................... 35 A. Findings ......................................................................................................... 35 B. Discussion ...................................................................................................... 56 CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ......................................... 69 A. Conclusion...................................................................................................... 69 B. Suggestion ...................................................................................................... 70 BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................... 71 AUTOBIGRAPHY .................................................................................................. 73 xi LIST OF TABLES Table 1.a.1 Indirect speech acs.................................................................................. 34 Table 1.a.1 Expressive ............................................................................................... 40 Table 2.a.1 Wh-exclamative..................................................................................... 42 xii ABSTRACT Name : Muji Retno NIM : 40300111080 Major : English Literature Department Faculty : Adab and Humanity Faculty Title : Parasitic Mirativity of English use in Colin Trevorrow’s Movie “Jurassic World”. Supervisor I : Abd. Muin. Supervisor II : Faidah Yusuf. This study is about parasitic mirativity of English use in Colin Trevorrow’s movie “Jurassic World”. Objectives of the research are to find out the types of meaning and to find out the types of structure in parasitic mirativity.
Recommended publications
  • Change Sentences Direct Into Indirect Speech

    Change Sentences Direct Into Indirect Speech

    Change Sentences Direct Into Indirect Speech WhichcarburiseFlickering Trevor soEdie binaurally. misrepresent mutiny punitively Main so and quarterly while huffing Abbey that Traver Lazaro always unswearing finalize cutinises her his his Rawlplugs?harpsichordists chronometers oppugnsginger distractingly, disserving all.he Lost his bike Indirect speech They show we simply going to running Direct speech They declare that. Reported Speech in English Grammar. What such a Jussive subjunctive Latin? Reported Speech Indirect Speech in English Summary. Ulysses asked the field is important to us consent, into direct speech change sentences indirect quote the benefits of speech rules in. Grammar Basics Direct and Indirect Speech Hitbullseye. Do not enclosed inside for change into past perfect as they do not track your team sports he was and what are transformed into the. 1 The Latin subjunctive is another mood of hypothetical verbal activity including ideas of uncertainty potential will shadow and refuse like. Direct to indirect speech General rules English Grammar. The subjunctive mainly expresses doubt or potential and what could have been whatever the indicative declares this happened or that happened the infantry is called 'jussive' which revenue from 'iubere' to command bid. Direct and Indirect Speech Verb Tense Changes with Rules. In the direct sentence the actual words of the speaker are quoted This is called Direct. Objective by the end leave the lesson the students should have able detect change where direct speech sentence into reported speech correctly Prerequisite match each. In direct speech the original words of stay are narrated no friend is made. Reported Speech English Grammar English Grammar Online.
  • The Strategy of Case-Marking

    The Strategy of Case-Marking

    Case marking strategies Helen de Hoop & Andrej Malchukov1 Radboud University Nijmegen DRAFT January 2006 Abstract Two strategies of case marking in natural languages are discussed. These are defined as two violable constraints whose effects are shown to converge in the case of differential object marking but diverge in the case of differential subject marking. The strength of the case bearing arguments will be shown to be of utmost importance for case marking as well as voice alternations. The strength of arguments can be viewed as a function of their discourse prominence. The analysis of the case marking patterns we find cross-linguistically is couched in a bidirectional OT analysis. 1. Assumptions In this section we wish to put forward our three basic assumptions: (1) In ergative-absolutive systems ergative case is assigned to the first argument x of a two-place relation R(x,y). (2) In nominative-accusative systems accusative case is assigned to the second argument y of a two-place relation R(x,y). (3) Morphologically unmarked case can be the absence of case. The first two assumptions deal with the linking between the first (highest) and second (lowest) argument in a transitive sentence and the type of case marking. For reasons of convenience, we will refer to these arguments quite sloppily as the subject and the object respectively, although we are aware of the fact that the labels subject and object may not be appropriate in all contexts, dependent on how they are actually defined. In many languages, ergative and accusative case are assigned only or mainly in transitive sentences, while in intransitive sentences ergative and accusative case are usually not assigned.
  • CHAPTER 3: the Role of Tense-Aspect in Discourse Management

    CHAPTER 3: the Role of Tense-Aspect in Discourse Management

    CHAPTER 3: The Role of Tense-Aspect in Discourse Management 3.0 Introduction Tense-aspect plays an important discourse management role in the construction and organization of mental spaces (and meaning) built in the ongoing process of discourse interpretation. The purpose of this chapter is to lay out in a systematic way the components of the model of tense-aspect proposed here and to give an overview of how tense-aspect functions, in conjunction with a set of Discourse Organization Principles, to constrain the mental space configurations built during the interpretation of ongoing discourse. This chapter lays the theoretical foundation for the detailed analysis of language specific tense markers, of tense in embedded clauses, and of tense in discourse- narrative, treated in subsequent chapters. In this chapter, I will propose a model which is an extension of the approach and ideas of Fauconnier (1985, 1986a, 1986b, 1990, 1991, to appear) and Dinsmore (1991). The model, which is the basis for the account of tense presented in this dissertation, consists of: • the mental space format (space partitioning, cognitive links between elements in different spaces, etc...) and the general mental space principles of access, optimization, spreading, and matching, as proposed in Fauconnier (1985) and updated in more recent work. 67 68 •a set of conceptual, discourse primitives: {BASE, FOCUS, EVENT, and V- POINT}, which are distributed over the hierarchical configuration of spaces built as the discourse interpretation process unfolds. •a set of Discourse Organization Principles which operate on these conceptual primitives, determining the types of space configurations which are possible. •a distinction between the FACT and PREDICTION status assigned to spaces.
  • Definiteness and Determinacy

    Definiteness and Determinacy

    Linguistics and Philosophy manuscript No. (will be inserted by the editor) Definiteness and Determinacy Elizabeth Coppock · David Beaver the date of receipt and acceptance should be inserted later Abstract This paper distinguishes between definiteness and determinacy. Defi- niteness is seen as a morphological category which, in English, marks a (weak) uniqueness presupposition, while determinacy consists in denoting an individual. Definite descriptions are argued to be fundamentally predicative, presupposing uniqueness but not existence, and to acquire existential import through general type-shifting operations that apply not only to definites, but also indefinites and possessives. Through these shifts, argumental definite descriptions may become either determinate (and thus denote an individual) or indeterminate (functioning as an existential quantifier). The latter option is observed in examples like `Anna didn't give the only invited talk at the conference', which, on its indeterminate reading, implies that there is nothing in the extension of `only invited talk at the conference'. The paper also offers a resolution of the issue of whether posses- sives are inherently indefinite or definite, suggesting that, like indefinites, they do not mark definiteness lexically, but like definites, they typically yield determinate readings due to a general preference for the shifting operation that produces them. Keywords definiteness · descriptions · possessives · predicates · type-shifting We thank Dag Haug, Reinhard Muskens, Luca Crniˇc,Cleo Condoravdi, Lucas
  • ELC 231: Introduction to Language and Linguistics Semantics & Pragmatics: Ambiguity and Meaning As USE Vs TRUTH

    ELC 231: Introduction to Language and Linguistics Semantics & Pragmatics: Ambiguity and Meaning As USE Vs TRUTH

    1 Introduction 2 Speech Acts 3 Gricean Maxims References r, e, b, f b, f, g, a V’ V’ PP [watch a movie]V’ [with a superhero]PP V NP with a superhero watch a movie ELC 231: Introduction to Language and Linguistics Semantics & Pragmatics: Ambiguity and Meaning as USE vs TRUTH Dr. Meagan Louie M. Louie ELC 231: Language and Linguistics 1 / 112 1 Introduction 1.1 Compositionality and Structural Ambiguity 2 Speech Acts 1.2 Meaning as USE 3 Gricean Maxims 1.3 Investigating USE-CONDITIONS References Core Subdomains Linguistics: The study of Language Phonetics Phonology Morphology Syntax Semantics Pragmatics M. Louie ELC 231: Language and Linguistics 2 / 112 1 Introduction 1.1 Compositionality and Structural Ambiguity 2 Speech Acts 1.2 Meaning as USE 3 Gricean Maxims 1.3 Investigating USE-CONDITIONS References Core Subdomains: Last Week - Syntax and Semantics Linguistics: The study of Language Phonetics Phonology Morphology Syntax Semantics Pragmatics M. Louie ELC 231: Language and Linguistics 3 / 112 1 Introduction 1.1 Compositionality and Structural Ambiguity 2 Speech Acts 1.2 Meaning as USE 3 Gricean Maxims 1.3 Investigating USE-CONDITIONS References Core Subdomains: This Week - Semantics and Pragmatics Linguistics: The study of Language Phonetics Phonology Morphology Syntax Semantics Pragmatics M. Louie ELC 231: Language and Linguistics 4 / 112 1 Introduction 1.1 Compositionality and Structural Ambiguity 2 Speech Acts 1.2 Meaning as USE 3 Gricean Maxims 1.3 Investigating USE-CONDITIONS References Core Subdomains: Semantics • Semantics: The study of MEANING in language 1 Review: Meaning as Truth and reference 2 REVIEW: Compositionality 3 A Semantic Interpretation System for Language (i) The Model/Ontology (ii) Lexical Entries (iii) Compositional Rules (i.e., how to semantically interpret PSRs) M.
  • Tagalog Pala: an Unsurprising Case of Mirativity

    Tagalog Pala: an Unsurprising Case of Mirativity

    Tagalog pala: an unsurprising case of mirativity Scott AnderBois Brown University Similar to many descriptions of miratives cross-linguistically, Schachter & Otanes(1972)’s clas- sic descriptive grammar of Tagalog describes the second position particle pala as “expressing mild surprise at new information, or an unexpected event or situation.” Drawing on recent work on mi- rativity in other languages, however, we show that this characterization needs to be refined in two ways. First, we show that while pala can be used in cases of surprise, pala itself merely encodes the speaker’s sudden revelation with the counterexpectational nature of surprise arising pragmatically or from other aspects of the sentence such as other particles and focus. Second, we present data from imperatives and interrogatives, arguing that this revelation need not concern ‘information’ per se, but rather the illocutionay update the sentence encodes. Finally, we explore the interactions between pala and other elements which express mirativity in some way and/or interact with the mirativity pala expresses. 1. Introduction Like many languages of the Philippines, Tagalog has a prominent set of discourse particles which express a variety of different evidential, attitudinal, illocutionary, and discourse-related meanings. Morphosyntactically, these particles have long been known to be second-position clitics, with a number of authors having explored fine-grained details of their distribution, rela- tive order, and the interaction of this with different types of sentences (e.g. Schachter & Otanes (1972), Billings & Konopasky(2003) Anderson(2005), Billings(2005) Kaufman(2010)). With a few recent exceptions, however, comparatively little has been said about the semantics/prag- matics of these different elements beyond Schachter & Otanes(1972)’s pioneering work (which is quite detailed given their broad scope of their work).
  • The Logic of Indirect Speech

    The Logic of Indirect Speech

    PERSPECTIVE The logic of indirect speech Steven Pinker*†, Martin A. Nowak‡, and James J. Lee* *Department of Psychology, and ‡Program for Evolutionary Dynamics, Departments of Mathematics and Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138 Edited by Jeremy Nathans, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, and approved December 11, 2007 (received for review July 31, 2007) When people speak, they often insinuate their intent indirectly rather than stating it as a bald proposition. Examples include sexual come-ons, veiled threats, polite requests, and concealed bribes. We propose a three-part theory of indirect speech, based on the idea that human communication involves a mixture of cooperation and conflict. First, indirect requests allow for plausible deniability, in which a cooperative listener can accept the request, but an uncooperative one cannot react adversarially to it. This intuition is sup- ported by a game-theoretic model that predicts the costs and benefits to a speaker of direct and indirect requests. Second, language has two functions: to convey information and to negotiate the type of relationship holding between speaker and hearer (in particu- lar, dominance, communality, or reciprocity). The emotional costs of a mismatch in the assumed relationship type can create a need for plausible deniability and, thereby, select for indirectness even when there are no tangible costs. Third, people perceive language as a digital medium, which allows a sentence to generate common knowledge, to propagate a message with high fidelity, and to serve as a reference point in coordination games. This feature makes an indirect request qualitatively different from a direct one even when the speaker and listener can infer each other’s intentions with high confidence.
  • Calculus of Possibilities As a Technique in Linguistic Typology

    Calculus of Possibilities As a Technique in Linguistic Typology

    Calculus of possibilities as a technique in linguistic typology Igor Mel’uk 1. The problem stated: A unified conceptual system in linguistics A central problem in the relationship between typology and the writing of individual grammars is that of developing a cross-linguistically viable con- ceptual system and a corresponding terminological framework. I will deal with this problem in three consecutive steps: First, I state the problem and sketch a conceptual system that I have put forward for typological explora- tions in morphology (Sections 1 and 2). Second, I propose a detailed illus- tration of this system: a calculus of grammatical voices in natural languages (Section 3). And third, I apply this calculus (that is, the corresponding con- cepts) in two particular case studies: an inflectional category known as an- tipassive and the grammatical voice in French (Sections 4 and 5). In the latter case, the investigation shows that even for a language as well de- scribed as French a rigorously standardized typological framework can force us to answer questions that previous descriptions have failed to re- solve. I start with the following three assumptions: 1) One of the most pressing tasks of today’s linguistics is description of particular languages, the essential core of this work being the writing of grammars and lexicons. A linguist sets out to describe a language as pre- cisely and exhaustively as possible; this includes its semantics, syntax, morphology and phonology plus (within the limits of time and funds avail- able) its lexicon. 2) Such a description is necessarily carried out in terms of some prede- fined concepts – such as lexical unit, semantic actant, syntactic role, voice, case, phoneme, etc.
  • LAMORINDA WEEKLY | 'Jurassic World'

    LAMORINDA WEEKLY | 'Jurassic World'

    LAMORINDA WEEKLY | 'Jurassic World' Published June 17th, 2015 'Jurassic World' By Derek Zemrak Oakland native Colin Trevorrow directed "Jurassic World," the fourth film in the Jurassic Park franchise. Trevorrow previously directed the highly acclaimed independent film "Safety Not Guaranteed" in 2012, which was awarded an Independent Spirit Award for Best First Feature. It was because of this movie that Steven Spielberg offered Trevorrow the opportunity to direct "Jurassic World," and resurrect what is quickly becoming a failing franchise. We all would agree the first film, "Jurassic Park," was an instant classic. It was new, fresh and it took filmmaking to a new level but since then the two sequels just didn't take us there. I would have to say that Trevorrow, who also co-wrote the script, makes a solid attempt at reviving the Jurassic Park magic. This time the dinosaur amusement park is the biggest attraction in the world, with over 20,000 dinosaur lovers a day visiting its location in Costa Rica. Claire (Bryce Dallas Howard, "The Help") and her two nephews, Gray (Ty Simpkins, "Insidious") and Zach (Nick Robinson, "The Kings of Summer") run the park. Gary loves dinosaurs and he is in heaven in the Sea World--like amusement park, which even has a Shamu type exhibit. To keep the park going, Claire's team creates a "super-predator" called Indominus Rex. Claire realizes that Indominus Rex will bring in more corporate sponsorship and keep the money rolling in. It is the greed of creating bigger and stronger Image provided dinosaurs that creates destruction in the park and on the island.
  • Context and Negation 1 the Role of Context in Young Children's Comprehension of Negation Ann E. Nordmeyer and Michael C. Frank

    Context and Negation 1 the Role of Context in Young Children's Comprehension of Negation Ann E. Nordmeyer and Michael C. Frank

    Context and negation 1 The role of context in young children’s comprehension of negation Ann E. Nordmeyer and Michael C. Frank Department of Psychology, Stanford University Thanks especially to the staff and families at the San Jose Children’s Discovery Museum. This work was supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship to AEN and a John Merck Scholars Fellowship to MCF. An earlier version of this work was presented to the Cognitive Science Society in Nordmeyer and Frank (2013). Address all correspondence to Ann E. Nordmeyer, Stanford University, Department of Psychology, Jordan Hall, 450 Serra Mall (Bldg. 420), Stanford, CA, 94305. Phone: 650-721-9270. E-mail: [email protected] Context and negation 2 Abstract Negation is an important concept in human language, yet little is known about children’s ability to comprehend negative sentences. In this paper, we explore how 2–5-year-old children’s comprehension of negation changes depending on the context in which a negative sentence occurs. We collected eye-tracking data while children watched a video in which they heard positive and negative sentences. Negative sentences, such as “look at the boy with no apples,” referred to a boy with nothing (Experiment 1) or a boy with an alternative object (Experiment 2). All children showed greater difficulty in resolving the referent when negative sentences referred to the boy with nothing, despite suggestions that nonexistence negations of this type are produced early. In addition, 3- and 4-year-old children showed an initial tendency to look away from the target and towards the named noun when the referent of the negative utterance was an alternative object.
  • Direct Speech and Indirect Speech Grammar in the Real World

    Direct Speech and Indirect Speech Grammar in the Real World

    UNIT Direct Speech and Indirect Speech 17 Human Motivation 1 Grammar in the Real World A What makes people work hard at their jobs? Read the article about ACADEMIC employee motivation. What type of reward is particularly effective in WRITING motivating workers? Argumentative ✓ writing using B Comprehension Check Complete the chart. Check ( ) whether graphs and tables each reward is external or internal. for support External Reward Internal Reward 1 Pay raise 2 Feeling successful 3 Freedom to work independently 4 Good salary 5 Good grades C Notice Find similar sentences in the article and complete the sentences below. 1 Lionel Messi , “Money is not a motivating factor… My motivation comes from playing the game I love.” 2 Daniel Pink, the author of a book on motivation, an audience once that Google was a great example of a company that supported autonomy. 3 Pink the audience that Google News and Gmail had been created during this free time. Each sentence tells what someone says. Which sentence gives the actual words of the speaker? How do you know? 248 Direct Speech and Indirect Speech WORKPLACE MOTIVATION Motivation is the desire to do something. Soccer Some studies on workplace motivation have star Lionel Messi said, “Money is not a motivating 25 focused on autonomy, which is the freedom to work factor… My motivation comes from playing the game I independently. This is an important internal reward. love.” Messi meant that he enjoys playing soccer more Daniel Pink, the author of a book on motivation, told 5 than making millions of dollars. Can that be true? What an audience once that Google was a good example other factors are important in motivating people? of a company that supported autonomy.
  • Public Policy for Thee, but Not for Me: Varying the Grammatical Person of Public Policy Justifications Influences Their Support

    Public Policy for Thee, but Not for Me: Varying the Grammatical Person of Public Policy Justifications Influences Their Support

    Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 9, No. 5, September 2014, pp. 433–444 Public policy for thee, but not for me: Varying the grammatical person of public policy justifications influences their support James F. M. Cornwell∗ David H. Krantz† Abstract Past research has shown that people consistently believe that others are more easily manipulated by external influences than they themselves are—a phenomenon called the “third-person effect” (Davison, 1983). The present research inves- tigates whether support for public policies aimed at changing behavior using incentives and other decision “nudges” is affected by this bias. Across two studies, we phrased justification for public policy initiatives using either the second- or third-person plural. In Study 1, we found that support for policies is higher when their justification points to people in general rather than the general “you”, and in Study 2 we found that this former phrasing also improves support compared to a no-justification control condition. Policy support is mediated by beliefs about the likelihood of success of the policies (as opposed to beliefs about the policies’ unintended consequences), and, in the second-person condition, is inversely related to a sense of personal agency. These effects suggest that the third-person effect holds true for nudge-type and incentive-based public policies, with implications for their popular support. Keywords: third-person effect, public policy, decision architecture, incentives, attitudes. 1 Introduction whether through the application of disincentive or incen- tive structures, have for some time now attempted to make In recent years, interest has grown in “nudge” economics use of self-interest in order to shift choices toward those (Thaler & Sunstein, 2009) that make use of research on that are considered more pro-social or desirable over the decision making to structure choice sets so that the most long term (Oliver, 1980).