The Mathematization of Economic Theory Gerard Debreu the American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 1. (Mar., 1991), Pp. 1-7

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Mathematization of Economic Theory Gerard Debreu the American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 1. (Mar., 1991), Pp. 1-7 The Mathematization of Economic Theory Gerard Debreu The American Economic Review, Vol. 81, No. 1. (Mar., 1991), pp. 1-7. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-8282%28199103%2981%3A1%3C1%3ATMOET%3E2.0.CO%3B2-N The American Economic Review is currently published by American Economic Association. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/aea.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Thu Aug 23 23:26:40 2007 Number 92 of a series of photographs of past presidents of the Association The Mathematization of Economic Theoryt Morgenstern published the Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. As the Second World War was drawing While the professional journals in the field near its resolution, economic theory entered of mathematical economics grew at an un- a phase of intensive mathematization that sustainably rapid rate, the American Eco- profoundly transformed our profession. In nomic Review underwent a radical change several of its main features that phase had in identity. In 1940, less than 3 percent of no precedent, and it will have no successor. the refereed pages of its 30th volume ven- Assessing it requires a multidimensional tured to include rudimentary mathematical analysis acknowledging the contributions to expressions. Fifty years later, nearly 40 per- economics that were made, as well as the cent of the refereed pages of the 80th vol- tensions among economists that were ume display mathematics of a more elabo- heightened. rate type. The development of mathematical eco- At the same time, the mathematization of nomics during the past half-century can be economists proceeded at an even faster pace read in the total number of pages published in the 13 American de~artmentsof eco- each year by the leading periodicals in the nomics labeled by a recent assessment of field, an index that I will follow at first. research-doctorate programs in the United From 1933, the date when they both started States (Lyle V. Jones et al., 1982) as "dis- publication, to 1959, those periodicals were tinguished" or "strong" according to the Econometrica and the Review of Economic scholarly quality of their faculties. Every Studies, and the index tells of the decline year the Fellows of the Econometric Society from a high point, above 700 pages in 1935 (ES) certify new members by election into to the lowest point, below 400 pages in their international guild, which increased in 1943-1944. But 1944 marked the beginning size from 46 in 1940 to 422 in 1990. For of a period of explosive growth in which those 13 departments together, the propor- Econometrica and the Review of Economic tion of ES Fellows among professors was Studies were joined in 1960 by the Interna- less than 1 percent in 1940; it is now close tional Economic Review, in 1969 by the to 50 percent. It equals or exceeds 50 per- Journal of Economic Theory, and in 1974 by cent for six of them, which were among the Journal of Mathematical Economics. In those assessed as the eight strongest. So 1977, these five periodicals together pub- mathematized a faculty expects its students lished over 5,000 pages. During the period to have what it considers to be minimal 1944-1977, the index more than doubled mathematical proficiency, and knowledge of every nine years. By that measure, 1944 was calculus and linear algebra is required, or a sharp turning point in the history of math- forcefully recommended, for admission to ematical economics. It was also the year in all 13 graduate programs. which John von Neumann and Oskar Several scholarly recognitions lay addi- tional emphasis on the role that mathemati- cal culture is now playing in our profession. Of the 152 members of the economics sec- 'presidential address delivered at the one-hundred tion of the American Academy of Arts and third meeting of the American Economic Association, December 29, 1990, Washington, DC. Sciences, 87 are Fellows of the Econometric *Department of Economics, University of California Society; and of the 40 members of the eco- at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720. nomics section of the National Academy of 2 THE AMERICAN ECONOMIC REWEW MARCH 1991 Sciences of the United States, 34 are ES been an inaccessible ideal toward which Fellows. From 1969 to 1990, 30 economics economic theory sometimes strove. During Nobel awards were made, and 25 of the that period, this striving became a powerful laureates are, or were, ES Fellows. Since it stimulus in the mathematization of eco- was first presented to Paul Samuelson in nomic theory. 1947, the John Bates Clark medal of the The great theories of physics cover an American Economic Association has been immense range of phenomena with a given to 21 economists, of whom 20 are ES supreme economy of expression. Of this, Fellows; and of the 26 living past presidents James Clerk Maxwell (1865) had given a of our Association, 13 are ES Fellows. notable example, as he described the elec- One may wish that those counts had not tromagnetic field by means of eight equa- been made. One may argue about points of tions at the time when mathematical eco- their interpretation. But they belong in our nomics was born and came of age in the common knowledge, and their thrust is un- middle of the 19th century. This extreme equivocal. They indicate how extensive the conciseness is made possible by the privi- mathematization of economics and how leged relationship that developed over sev- deep the accompanying change of our field eral centuries between physics and mathe- were over the past five decades. matics. In turn, the former presented the The perception of the depth of that latter with open problems, or found to ques- change is reinforced by a comparison of the tions raised by physical theory ready-made levels of mathematics required in 1940 and answers discovered by mathematicians in in 1990 to follow the development of eco- their abstract universe. Sometimes the nomic theory in every direction it was tak- causal linkage of research done in each one ing. Fifty years ago, basic undergraduate of the two fields could not easily be unrav- preparation in mathematics was almost al- eled; and, on occasion, the same scientist ways sufficient. Today, graduate training in made inextricably intertwined contributions mathematics is necessary. If, instead of be- to both disciplines. ing a follower, one wishes to be an active The benefits of that special relationship participant in that development along its were large for both fields; but physics did most technical avenues, a high degree of not completely surrender to the embrace of mathematical professionalism is called for. mathematics and to its inherent compulsion Several faculty members of the 13 depart- toward logical rigor. The experimental re- ments of economics mentioned previously sults and the factual observations that are at were actually identified as mathematicians the basis of physics, and which provide a by their doctorates; four of them served as constant check on its theoretical construc- chairmen of those departments during the tions, occasionally led its bold reasonings to past 25 years. If still sharper focus brings violate knowingly the canons of mathemati- out the intellectual leaders of that develop- cal deduction. ment, prominent among them is John von In these directions, economic theory could Neumann, one of the foremost mathemati- not follow the role model offered by physi- cians of his generation. cal theory. Next to the most sumptuous In that development process, mathemati- scientific tool of physics, the Superconduct- cal economics was continuously redefined as ing Super Collider whose construction cost new territories were included within its out- is estimated to be on the order of $10"' ward-moving frontier and as topics that were (David P. Hamilton, 1990; see also Science, once at that frontier became standard parts 5 October 19901, the experiments of eco- of the graduate, if not of the undergradu- nomics look excessively frugal. Being denied ate, economic-theory curriculum. a sufficiently secure experimental base, eco- nomic theory has to adhere to the rules of logical discourse and must renounce the facility of internal inconsistency. A deduc- Before the contemporary period of the tive structure that tolerates a contradiction past five decades, theoretical physics had does so under the penalty of being useless, VOL. 81 NO. I DEBREU: MA THEM TIZATION OF ECONOMIC THEORY 3 since any statement can be derived flawlessly commodity (opposite signs differentiating and immediately from that contradiction. inputs from outputs). That list can be treated In its mathematical form, economic the- as the list of the coordinates of a point in ory is open to an efficient scrutiny for logi- the linear commodity space.
Recommended publications
  • Handicapping Economics’ ‘Baby Nobel,’ the Clark Medal - Real Time E
    Handicapping Economics’ ‘Baby Nobel,’ the Clark Medal - Real Time E... http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/04/22/handicapping-economics-ba... More News, Quotes, Companies, Videos SEARCH Thursday, April 22, 2010 As of 4:16 PM EDT BLOGS U.S. Edition Today's Paper Video Blogs Journal Community Log In Home World U.S. Business Markets Tech Personal Finance Life & Style Opinion Careers Real Estate Small Business WSJ BLOGS Reserve Bank of India’s ‘Nirvana’ Rate Economic insight and analysis from The Wall Street Journal. APRIL 22, 2010, 4:04 PM ET Handicapping Economics’ ‘Baby Nobel,’ the Clark Medal Article Comments (1) REAL TIME ECONOMICS HOME PAGE » 1 of 3 4/22/2010 4:20 PM Handicapping Economics’ ‘Baby Nobel,’ the Clark Medal - Real Time E... http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2010/04/22/handicapping-economics-ba... Email Printer Friendly Permalink Share: facebook Text Size By Justin Lahart Friday, the American Economic Association will present the John Bates Clark medal, awarded to the nation’s most promising economist under the age of 40. The Clark is known as the “Baby Nobel,” and with good reason. Of the 30 economists who have won it, 12 have gone on to win the Nobel, including Paul Samuelson and Milton Friedman. The award was given biennially until last year, when the AEA decided to give it annually. Massachusetts Institute of Technology economist Esther Duflo, 37, is considered a frontrunner. The head of MIT’s Jameel Poverty Action Lab with Abhijit Banerjee, she’s been at the forefront of using randomized experiments to analyze development American Economic Association Most Popular programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard T. Ely and Woodrow Wilson at “The Hopkins”
    SUBSCRIBE NOW AND RECEIVE CRISIS AND LEVIATHAN* FREE! “The Independent Review does not accept “The Independent Review is pronouncements of government officials nor the excellent.” conventional wisdom at face value.” —GARY BECKER, Noble Laureate —JOHN R. MACARTHUR, Publisher, Harper’s in Economic Sciences Subscribe to The Independent Review and receive a free book of your choice* such as the 25th Anniversary Edition of Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government, by Founding Editor Robert Higgs. This quarterly journal, guided by co-editors Christopher J. Coyne, and Michael C. Munger, and Robert M. Whaples offers leading-edge insights on today’s most critical issues in economics, healthcare, education, law, history, political science, philosophy, and sociology. Thought-provoking and educational, The Independent Review is blazing the way toward informed debate! Student? Educator? Journalist? Business or civic leader? Engaged citizen? This journal is for YOU! *Order today for more FREE book options Perfect for students or anyone on the go! The Independent Review is available on mobile devices or tablets: iOS devices, Amazon Kindle Fire, or Android through Magzter. INDEPENDENT INSTITUTE, 100 SWAN WAY, OAKLAND, CA 94621 • 800-927-8733 • [email protected] PROMO CODE IRA1703 The Shaping of a Future President’s Economic Thought Richard T. Ely and Woodrow Wilson at “The Hopkins” F CLIFFORD F. THIES AND GARY M. PECQUET homas Woodrow Wilson (1856–1924) was the first and is still the only president oftheUnitedStatestoholdanearneddoctoraldegree.HisPh.D.wasawarded T by the Johns Hopkins University (“The Hopkins”) in 1886. He was also the president of an institution of higher education and, unique among U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • External Influence As an Indicator of Scholarly Importance
    This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/accepted for publication in the following source: Chan, Ho Fai, Frey, Bruno, Gallus, Jana, Schaffner, Markus, Torgler, Benno,& Whyte, Stephen (2016) External influence as an indicator of scholarly importance. CESifo Economic Studies, 62(1), pp. 170-195. This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/84714/ c Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under a Creative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use and that permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu- ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then refer to the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog- nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe that this work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected] Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record (i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub- mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) can be identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear- ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source. https://doi.org/10.1093/cesifo/ifv010 External Influence as an Indicator of Scholarly Importance Ho Fai Chan, Bruno S. Frey, Jana Gallus, Markus Schaffner, Benno Torgler, and Stephen Whyte Abstract: Although the external influence of scholars has usually been approximated by publication and citation count, the array of scholarly activities is far more extensive.
    [Show full text]
  • Imperialism, Racism, and Fear of Democracy in Richard Ely's Progressivism
    The Rot at the Heart of American Progressivism: Imperialism, Racism, and Fear of Democracy in Richard Ely's Progressivism Gerald Friedman Department of Economics University of Massachusetts at Amherst November 8, 2015 This is a sketch of my long overdue intellectual biography of Richard Ely. It has been way too long in the making and I have accumulated many more debts than I can acknowledge here. In particular, I am grateful to Katherine Auspitz, James Boyce, Bruce Laurie, Tami Ohler, and Jean-Christian Vinel, and seminar participants at Bard, Paris IV, Paris VII, and the Five College Social History Workshop. I am grateful for research assistance from Daniel McDonald. James Boyce suggested that if I really wanted to write this book then I would have done it already. And Debbie Jacobson encouraged me to prioritize so that I could get it done. 1 The Ely problem and the problem of American progressivism The problem of American Exceptionalism arose in the puzzle of the American progressive movement.1 In the wake of the Revolution, Civil War, Emancipation, and radical Reconstruction, no one would have characterized the United States as a conservative polity. The new Republican party took the United States through bloody war to establish a national government that distributed property to settlers, established a national fiat currency and banking system, a progressive income tax, extensive program of internal improvements and nationally- funded education, and enacted constitutional amendments establishing national citizenship and voting rights for all men, and the uncompensated emancipation of the slave with the abolition of a social system that had dominated a large part of the country.2 Nor were they done.
    [Show full text]
  • John Bates Clark As a Pioneering Neoclassical Economist Thomas C
    “A Certain Rude Honesty”: John Bates Clark as a Pioneering Neoclassical Economist Thomas C. Leonard John Bates Clark (1847–1938), the most eminent American economist of a century ago, was, in his own day, caricatured as an apologist for laissez-faire capitalism (Veblen 1908).1 The caricature has shown stay- ing power, a measure, perhaps, of the relative paucity of scholarship on Clark and his work. Recent Clark research signals a welcome attempt at a more accurate portrait (Morgan 1994; Henry 1995; Persky 2000). But some revisionists would remake Clark the apologist for capital into Clark the Progressive exemplar. Robert Prasch (1998, 2000), for exam- ple, depicts Clark as a Progressive paragon, which groups him with the greatreformers of Progressive-Era politicaleconomy—Social Gospel- ers such as Richard T. Ely and his protégé John R. Commons, labor leg- islation activists such as Clark’s junior colleague Henry Rogers Seager Correspondence may be addressed to Thomas C. Leonard, Department of Economics, Fisher Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; e-mail: [email protected]. I wish to ac- knowledge the gracious hospitality of Rolf Ohlsson and the Department of Economic History at Lund University, Lund, Sweden. This essay benefited from conversations with Benny Carls- son, the comments of Deirdre McCloskey and Bob Goldfarb, and the thoughtful criticisms of two anonymous referees. 1. All successful caricatures contain an element of truth, and Clark surely invited contro- versy when he argued thatworkers paid theirmarginal productgetwhatthey
    [Show full text]
  • To the John Bates Clark Medal Committee
    A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Torgler, Benno Article Letter to the Editor: To the John Bates Clark Medal Committee Open Economics Provided in Cooperation with: De Gruyter Suggested Citation: Torgler, Benno (2019) : Letter to the Editor: To the John Bates Clark Medal Committee, Open Economics, ISSN 2451-3458, De Gruyter, Warsaw, Vol. 2, Iss. 1, pp. 40-42, http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/openec-2019-0004 This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/236596 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ www.econstor.eu Open Economics 2019; 2: 40–42 Letter to the Editor Benno Torgler* To the John Bates Clark Medal Committee¹ https://doi.org/10.1515/openec-2019-0004 Received April 8, 2019; accepted April 26, 2019 Abstract: This humoristic piece pretends to offer a candidacy for the John Bates Clark Medal.
    [Show full text]
  • Department Brochure
    Table of Contents Introduction Recent Developments 4 Department Overview 6 Academic Programs Undergraduate Economics 9 Graduate Economics 11 Fields of Study Economic Theory 13 Macroeconomics 15 International Economics 18 Development Economics 19 Econometrics 21 Industrial Organization and Regulation 23 Labor Economics 25 Environmental Economics Program 26 Public Economics 27 Political Economy 28 Health Economics 28 Organizational Economics 30 Financial Economics 31 The Massachusetts Institute of Technology is committed to the principle of equal opportunity in education and employment. The Institute prohibits discrimination against individuals on the basis of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, pregnancy, religion, disability, age, genetic information, veteran status, or national or ethnic origin in the administration of its educational policies, admissions policies, employment policies, scholarship and loan programs, and other Institute administered programs and activities; the Institute may, however, favor US citizens or residents in admissions and financial aid.* The Vice President for Human Resources is designated as the Institute’s Equal Opportunity Officer. Inquiries concerning the Institute’s policies, compliance with applicable laws, statutes, and regulations, and complaints may be directed to Ramona Allen, Vice President for Human Resources, Building NE49-5000, 617-324-5675. In addition, inquiries about Title IX (which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex) may be directed to the Institute’s Title IX Coordinator, Sarah Rankin, Room W31-223, 617-324-7526, [email protected]. Inquiries about the laws and about compliance may also be directed to the United States Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, Region I, 5 Post Office Square, 8th Floor, Boston, MA 02109- 3921, 617-289-0111, [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Lucas Critique After the Crisis: a Historicization and Review of One Theory’S Eminence
    Vol. 7 New School Economic Review 3 Lucas Critique After the Crisis: a Historicization and Review of one Theory’s Eminence By Brandt Weathers Abstract This paper re-examines the Lucas Critique (LC) in light of the 2008 financial crisis and recent scholarship. Inspired by the theoretical reassessments of the Lucas Critique by economists (Anwar Shaikh) and historians (Daniel T. Rodgers), this paper takes on two separate tasks: 1) to understand the historical context that gave rise to Robert Lucas’ infamous 1976 paper now commonly called the ‘Lucas Critique’, and 2) to examine relevant literature (as it addresses issues of theory, policy, and statistical techniques) since the recent US financial crisis to find out if the Lucas Critique has been subject to greater scrutiny in the economics discipline. Using the SSRN database, this paper concludes that little has changed in the perception of the Lucas Critique since 2008; however, a large quantity of associations with the theory that diverge from the content of the paper itself makes clear the need for another project to contextualize the Lucas Critique since its publication (not simply up to its publication, which is performed here). Introduction In early December 1995, University of Chicago Professor Robert Emerson Lucas Jr. was awarded the Nobel Prize in Economic Sciences.1 Besides maybe the John Bates Clark Medal,2 no award honors an economist with such prestige in the popular imagination, likely due to its association with the other renowned Nobel prizes. Here at the event Professor Lars E.O. Svensson of the Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences introduced Robert E.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Robert Lucas (1967-1981)
    University of Brasilia Economics and Politics Research Group A CNPq-Brazil Research Group http://www.EconPolRG.wordpress.com Research Center on Economics and FinanceCIEF Research Center on Market Regulation–CERME Research Laboratory on Political Behavior, Institutions and Public PolicyLAPCIPP Master’s Program in Public EconomicsMESP Understanding Robert Lucas (1967-1981) Alexandre F. S. Andrada Universidade de Brasília Economics and Politics Working Paper 49/2015 April 15, 2015 Economics and Politics Research Group Working Paper Series Paper presented at the 4th ESHET Latin American Conference. Belo Horizonte – Brazil, November, 2014 _____________________________________________________________________________________ Understanding Robert Lucas (1967-1981) Alexandre F. S. Andrada [email protected] Universidade de Brasília (UnB) _____________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract This paper analyzes Robert Lucas’ contribution to economic theory between 1967 (year of his first solo publication) and 1981 (the year before the emergence of Real Business Cycle approach). The paper has two parts. In the first one, we do a citation analysis, using data from four different sources: Google Scholar, Web of Science, IDEAS RePEc and Jstor. With this data, we answer two questions: what is Lucas most influential papers nowadays? And how this influence changed over the time? We show, for instance, that according to three of those four sources, Lucas’ most influential paper today is not from his business cycle research agenda, which gave him his Nobel Prize. Moreover, it is clear the loss of influence of Lucas’ macroeconomic theory since early 1980s. In the second part, we construct a ranking with the papers Lucas most often used as reference in his paper, and we separate those reference in ‘positive’ and ‘negative’.
    [Show full text]
  • Shleifer's Failure
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 2013 Shleifer's Failure Jonathan Klick University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Courts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Economics Commons, Judges Commons, Law and Economics Commons, Legal Studies Commons, and the Litigation Commons Repository Citation Klick, Jonathan, "Shleifer's Failure" (2013). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1129. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1129 This Book Review is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Shleifer’s Failure THE FAILURE OF JUDGES AND THE RISE OF REGULATORS. By Andrei Shleifer. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 2012. 352 pages. $40.00. Reviewed by Jonathan Klick* I. Introduction Andrei Shleifer is undoubtedly among the world’s most important economists. By standard citation measures, no one else is anywhere close. For example, his nearly 19,000 citations in the RePEc rankings1 as of October 2012 place him ahead of Nobel Prize2 winners such as James Heckman (12,212),3 Joseph Stiglitz (11,431),4 and Robert Lucas (9,314).5 His work on corporate finance, behavioral finance, and transition economics earned him the American Economic Association’s prestigious John Bates Clark medal in 1999.6 Perhaps not even international scandal will keep Shleifer from taking his place among the Nobelists.7 Shleifer’s influence in legal scholarship is almost as large.
    [Show full text]
  • LN-6 Alfred Marshall, Irving Fisher, American Institutional Economics, Thorstein Veblen Alfred Marshall Succeeded Ricardo and J
    LN-6 Alfred Marshall, Irving Fisher, American institutional economics, Thorstein Veblen Backhouse: Ch. 8/177-184/, 9/185-200/; Sandmo: Ch. 10, 12/282-292/, 13/295-298. Alfred Marshall 1842-1924 Alfred Marshall succeeded Ricardo and J.S. Mill as the great name of British economics. He dominated the scene through eight editions of Principles of Economics - a Bible for British economists - from 1890 to 1920 and well beyond that. Founder of the Cambridge School of economics. Used the idea of predecessors but added a lot of useful tools, concepts and graphs. Marshall is well covered in Backhouse and Sandmo. Marshall studied mathematics and knew how to use it in economics. He chose to marginalize mathematics in his book. An interesting aspect of Marshall is that he was more attracted to biological metaphors (such as a forests of firms) than the more common mechanical.@ Marshall wrote much else but the promised Vol. II of Principles never appeared. Notice that Marshall was 48 when he published Principles while Jevons died at 47. Marshall’s Principles was used in many universities, including Oslo. Frisch treated it with less than biblical authority, writing write comments on various chapters, called excursus (ekskurs), until the book was thrown out while the excursi remained. More difficult to like Marshall than most other great names in economics, due to his obsessive personality and stiffness and attitudes such as his opposition the assimilation of women into an educational system designed for men.@ From the fancy 2011 calendar I have two months devoted to Marshall, so let us look at them:@@ Rather than overlap with the textbooks I will say a little about Ragnar Frisch’s view on Marshall as expressed in the excursi (cf.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Issue Download
    The Journal of The Journal of Economic Perspectives Economic Perspectives The Journal of Winter 2021, Volume 35, Number 1 Economic Perspectives Symposia Minimum Wage Alan Manning, “The Elusive Employment Effect of the Minimum Wage” Arindrajit Dube and Attila Lindner, “City Limits: What Do Local-Area Minimum Wages Do?” Jeffrey Clemens, “How Do Firms Respond to Minimum Wage Increases? Understanding the Relevance of Non-Employment Margins” Price V. Fishback and Andrew J. Seltzer, “The Rise of American Minimum Wages, 1912–1968” A journal of the Polarization in Courts American Economic Association Adam Bonica and Maya Sen, “Estimating Judicial Ideology” Daniel Hemel, “Can Structural Changes Fix the Supreme Court?” Economics of Higher Education 35, Number 1 Winter 2021 Volume David Figlio and Morton Schapiro, “Stafng the Higher Education Classroom” John Bound, Breno Braga, Gaurav Khanna, and Sarah Turner, “The Globalization of Postsecondary Education: The Role of International Students in the US Higher Education System” W. Bentley MacLeod and Miguel Urquiola, “Why Does the United States Have the Best Research Universities? Incentives, Resources, and Virtuous Circles” Articles Florian Scheuer and Joel Slemrod, “Taxing Our Wealth” Daron Acemoglu, “Melissa Dell: Winner of the 2020 Clark Medal” Recommendations for Further Reading Winter 2021 The American Economic Association The Journal of Correspondence relating to advertising, busi- Founded in 1885 ness matters, permission to quote, or change Economic Perspectives of address should be sent to the AEA business EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE office: [email protected]. Street ad- Elected Officers and Members A journal of the American Economic Association dress: American Economic Association, 2014 Broadway, Suite 305, Nashville, TN 37203.
    [Show full text]