Nauru and Unesco: a Snapshot

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

As of October 2015 KEY FACTS AND FIGURES ON NIUE / UNESCO COOPERATION 1. Membership in UNESCO: 26 October 1993 2. Membership of the Executive Board: No 3. Membership of the Intergovernmental Committees, Commissions, etc.: . Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) 4. The Director-General’s visits to Niue: none 5. Permanent Delegation to UNESCO: none 6. UNESCO Office in Apia: . Date of establishment: 1983 . Member States served: Today, the Office operates as a Cluster Office in charge of 16 countries plus 1 associate member: Australia, the Cook Islands, Fiji, Kiribati, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia (the Federated States of), Nauru, New Zealand, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, the Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu and Tokelau (Associate Member) . Director: Mr Etienne Clement (since 01/112013 D-1, Belgium) 7. National Commission of Niue for UNESCO: . Date of establishment: March 1993 . Chairperson: Hon. Pokota Ikiua Lalotoa Sipeli (since February 2012) . Interim Secretary-General: Ms Birtha Togahai (since January 2014) 8. Personalities linked to UNESCO’s activities: none 9. UNESCO Chairs & UNITWIN Networks: none 10. Associated Schools: 2 (1 Primary Schools, 1 Secondary). Niue joined the ASP Network in 1997. 11. Category 2 Institutes and Centres: none 12. World Heritage Sites: none 13. Tentative List: none 14. Intangible Heritage List : no inscriptions 15. Biosphere Reserves: none 16. Memory of the World Register: no entry 17. Creative Cities Network: no appointment 1 18. Legal instruments: 1 ratified and 38 non-ratified 19. Anniversaries with which UNESCO is associated in 2014-2015: none 20. Participation Programme: . 2014-2015: 3 projects approved for a total amount of US$ 77,200 . 2012-2013: 4 projects approved for a total amount of US$ 88,000 . 2010-2011: 5 projects approved for a total amount of US$ 102,000 21. Fellowships: no fellowship awarded since 2010 22. Voluntary contributions to UNESCO : Voluntary Contributions to UNESCO Extra-Budgetary Activities and Institutes ( Expressed in US Dollars ) COUNTRY Jan-Jun 2015 2014 2013 NIUE - - - 23. Payment of assessed membership fees for 2014-2015: (Assessed rate: 0.001%; contributions assessed for 2014-2015: US$ 6,530) 24. Representation within the Secretariat: non-represented (min.2 – max.4) 2 .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Immigration Detention in Nauru
Immigration Detention in Nauru March 2016 The Republic of Nauru, a tiny South Pacific island nation that has a total area of 21 square kilometres, is renowned for being one of the smallest countries in the world, having a devastated natural environment due to phosphate strip-mining, and operating a controversial offshore processing centre for Australia that has confined asylum seeking men, women, and children. Considered an Australian “client state” by observers, Nauru reported in 2015 that “the major source of revenue for the Government now comes from the operation of the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru.”1 Pointing to the numerous alleged abuses that have occurred to detainees on the island, a writer for the Guardian opined in October 2015 that the country had “become the symbol of the calculated cruelty, of the contradictions, and of the unsustainability of Australia’s $3bn offshore detention regime.”2 Nauru, which joined the United Nations in 1999, initially drew global attention for its migration policies when it finalised an extraterritorial cooperation deal with Australia to host an asylum seeker detention centre in 2001. This deal, which was inspired by U.S. efforts to interdict Haitian and Cuban asylum seekers in the Caribbean, was part of what later became known as Australia’s first “Pacific Solution” migrant deterrence policy, which involved intercepting and transferring asylum seekers arriving by sea—dubbed “irregular maritime arrivals” (IMAs)—to “offshore processing centres” in Nauru and Manus Island, Papua New Guinea.3 As part of this initial Pacific Solution, which lasted until 2008, the Nauru offshore processing centre was managed by the International Migration Organisation (IOM).
[Show full text]
The Pacific Solution Or a Pacific Nightmare?: the Difference Between Burden Shifting and Responsibility Sharing
THE PACIFIC SOLUTION OR A PACIFIC NIGHTMARE?: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BURDEN SHIFTING AND RESPONSIBILITY SHARING Dr. Savitri Taylor* I. INTRODUCTION II. THE PACIFIC SOLUTION III. OFFSHORE PROCESSING CENTERS AND STATE RESPONSIBILITY IV. PACIFIC NIGHTMARES A. Nauru B. Papua New Guinea V. INTERPRETING NIGHTMARES VI. SPREADING NIGHTMARES VII. SHARING RESPONSIBILITY VIII. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION The guarantee that persons unable to enjoy human rights in their country of nationality, who seek asylum in other countries, will not be returned to the country from which they fled is a significant achievement of international efforts to validate the assertion that those rights truly are the “rights of man.” There are currently 145 states,1 including Australia, that are parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugees Convention)2 and/or the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugees Protocol).3 The prohibition on refoulement is the key provision of the Refugees Convention. Article 33(1) of the Refugees Convention provides that no state party “shall expel or return (refouler) a refugee in any manner * Senior Lecturer, School of Law, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia. 1 As of February 1, 2004. 2 July 28, 1951, 1954 Austl. T. S. No. 5 (entered into force for Australia and generally on April 22, 1954). 3 January 31, 1967, 1973 Austl. T. S. No. 37 (entered into force generally on October 4, 1967, and for Australia on December 13, 1973). 2 ASIAN-PACIFIC LAW & POLICY JOURNAL; Vol. 6, Issue 1 (Winter
[Show full text]
Download Pacwasteplus Project Snapshot-Nauru
PACWASTEPLUS PROJECT SNAPSHOT December 2020 ISBN: 978-982-04-0929-3 The PacWastePlus programme is being implemented across 14 Pacific island countries and Timor-Leste, and will address both the cost-effective and sustainable management of waste and pollution in the priority waste streams of: • Hazardous wastes (asbestos, healthcare waste, and e-waste) • Solid wastes (organic waste, disaster waste, bulky waste, and recyclables) • related aspects of Wastewater The programme will deliver positive social and environmental outcomes from the effective management of waste in the Pacific. PacWastePlus activities are tailored to address the specific needs of each country based on their identified priorities. Nauru is one of the 15 countries participating in the PacWastePlus programme. Nauru is a single coral island located in the Nauru has a limited land area and a stressed Micronesia region of the central Pacific. It environment following decades of destruction comprises of 14 districts, covering a land area of caused by years of mining on most parts of the 21km2, making it the smallest island nation in the island. Population growth and growth of the Pacific. Its exclusive economic zone covers an refugee centre may result in further oceanic area of 320,000km2. Nauru has no official environmental degradation. capital, although most government offices are located in Yaren, home to approximately 8% of the 10,293 population . Located near the equator and as such Nauru Nauru’s population had been growing until the experiences extreme weather events including collapse of the phosphate mining industry in 2006 drought. Prolonged droughts are forecast to cause which resulted in the return of I-Kiribati and problems to groundwater lenses, and eventually Tuvaluan workers to their home countries.
[Show full text]
Situation Analysis of Children in Nauru ©United Nations Children’S Fund (UNICEF), Pacific Office, Suva
28 Logo signature RECOMMENDED VERSIONS The ideal treatment for our logo is inside a cyan container . This helps reinforce the relationship between our logo and our brand colour and enhances legibility when placed over photographs and graphics. Logo signature aligned from bottom Logo signature centred of container suitable to be anchored in circular container at the top right corner (see next page) ALTERNATIVE VERSIONS Logo signature Logo signature Logo signature Horizontal logo signature centred in container aligned from top of centred in container centred in short container container UNICEF Brand Book l May 2018 Situation Analysis of Children in Nauru ©United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Pacific Office, Suva December 2017 This report was written by Kirsten Anderson, Ruth Barnes, Awaz Raoof and Carolyn Hamilton, with the assistance of Laura Mertsching, Jorun Arndt, Karin Frode, Safya Benniche and Kristiana Papi. Maurice Dunaiski contributed to the chapters on Health and WASH. Further revision to the Child Protection chapter was done by Shelley Casey. The report was commissioned by UNICEF Pacific, which engaged Coram International, at Coram Children’s Legal Centre, to finalize Situation Analysis of Nauru. The Situational Analyses were managed by a Steering Committee within UNICEF Pacific and UNICEF EAPRO, whose members included Andrew Colin Parker; Gerda Binder (EAPRO); Iosefo Volau; Laisani Petersen; Lemuel Fyodor Villamar; Maria Carmelita Francois; Settasak Akanimart; Stanley Gwavuya (Vice Chair), Stephanie Kleschnitzki (EAPRO); Uma Palaniappan; Vathinee Jitjaturunt (Chair); and Waqairapoa Tikoisuva. The contents of the report do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of UNICEF. UNICEF accepts no responsibility for error. Any part of this publication may be freely reproduced with appropriate acknowledgement.
[Show full text]
An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius Thomas M
Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2004 Small-State Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius Thomas M. Ethridge Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Political Science at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Ethridge, Thomas M., "Small-State Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius" (2004). Masters Theses. 1325. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/1325 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS/FIELD EXPERIENCE PAPER REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates (who have written formal theses) SUBJECT: Permission to Reproduce Theses The University Library is receiving a number of request from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow these to be copied. PLEASE SIGN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that · dings. ~Ju } oy Oat~ 1 I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University NOT allow my thesis to be reproduced because: Author's Signature Date lhesis4.form SMALL-STATE FOREIGN POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF KIRIBATI, NAURU, PALAU, TONGA, TUVALU AND MAURITIUS (TITLE) BY Thomas M.
[Show full text]
Getting to Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands
Getting to Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands Airport • Majuro is served by the Amata Kabua International Airport with the call letters MAJ . • Airport Tax: A departure fee of $20.00 U.S. is required except for children less than 12 years old and adults over 60 years old. Airlines The two main airlines servicing the Marshall Islands from abroad are: • United Airlines. United operates between Asia and Honolulu and provides a connection to the Marshall Islands in both directions on what is affectionately named the “Island Hopper”. The route is Honolulu direct to Majuro (4.5 hours), or Guam to Majuro with four quick “hops” (8 hours). • Nauru Airlines. Nauru Airlines operates between Australia and the Marshall Islands and also connects with Nauru and Kiribati. Immigration • U.S., Palau, and FSM Citizens are exempt from Visas with a valid Passport. • A 30-day visa-on-arrival will be granted for citizens of Australia and New Zealand, Canada, European Union (includes United Kingdom), South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines with the proper paperwork. • All others should use the following procedure: 1. Generally, an application for a visa should consist of the following: i. Completed application form (with two recent passport size photos) ii. Passport (valid for at least 6 months) iii. Supporting documents: (i) Letter from applicant – stating the purpose and duration of visit (ii) Police record – must be dated within last 3 months (iii) Health clearance – must show person is free from HIV/AIDS and TB; dated within last 3 months (iv) Receipt – to show payment of application fee 2.
[Show full text]
THE PACIFIC ISLANDS Part III: Micronesia by Donald M
SOUTHEAST ASIA SERIES Vol. XXV No. 4 (Micronesia) THE PACIFIC ISLANDS Part III: Micronesia by Donald M. Topping March 1977 Micronesia. The tiny islands. The Lilliput of its broadest sense are not synonymous. Cultural Oceania lying just north of the equator, some of Micronesia would have to include the Gilbert whose citizens are now trying to tie down their Islands and Nauru, which are not part of the TTPI. Gulliver. For the past 31 years, Gulliver has been If the Marianas are to be considered Micronesian the United States government, first through its (some would argue on linguistic grounds that they Department of Navy (1944-1951), and later through are not), we must include Guam in Cultural Micro- the Department of Interior, with close supervision nesia but not as part of the TTPI. The TTPI also and support from the Departments of Defense and includes two inhabited atolls whose people are pure State, and the CIA. While there have been three Polynesian (Kapingamarangi and Nukuoro). When previous Gullivers, none has the unique relation- most people today (excluding anthropologists and ship that the United States has had with the linguists) use the term Micronesia, they mean the 123,000 inhabitants (1973) of the Trust Territory of TTPI, which is the way we shall use the term in this the Pacific Islands (as the islands are known offi- paper to include the Caroline, Marshall, and cially). Mariana Islands, but excluding Guam. The more than two thousand islands of Micro- The first of the 2,241 islands of Micronesia to be nesia are indeed small, appearing as mere specks visited by a European were the Marianas, when on wall-sized maps.
[Show full text]
2002 04 Small Is Viable.Pdf
The U.S. Congress established the East-West Center in 1960 to foster mutual understanding and coopera- tion among the governments and peoples of the Asia Pacific region including the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. govern- ment with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, corporations, and Asian and Pacific governments. East-West Center Working Papers are circulated for comment and to inform interested colleagues about work in progress at the Center. For more information about the Center or to order publications, contact: Publication Sales Office East-West Center 1601 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96848-1601 Telephone: 808-944-7145 Facsimile: 808-944-7376 Email: [email protected] Website: www.EastWestCenter.org EAST-WEST CENTER WORKING PAPERSPAPERSEAST-WEST Pacific Islands Development SeriesSeriesPacific No. 15, April 2002 Small is Viable: The Global Ebbs and Flows of a Pacific Atoll Nation Gerard A. Finin Gerard A. Finin is a Senior Fellow in the Pacific Islands Development Program, East-West Center. He can be reached at telephone: 808-944-7751 or email: [email protected]. East-West Center Working Papers: Pacific Islands Development Series is an unreviewed and unedited prepublication series reporting on research in progress. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Center. Please direct orders and requests to the East-West Center's Publication Sales Office. The price for Working Papers is $3.00 each plus postage. For surface mail, add $3.00 for the first title plus $0.75 for each additional title or copy sent in the same shipment.
[Show full text]
Climate Change and Migration in the Pacific
KEY FINDINGS CLIMATE IMPACTS People in Kiribati, Nauru, and Tuvalu are already experiencing climate Men and women experience migration differently. Women are slightly change impacts: incremental sea level rise, saltwater intrusion, and more likely to migrate for education and men are more likely to migrate drought. For example, most households in all three countries have been for work. impacted by climate change over the past 10 years (94% in Kiribati, 97% in Migration demand is greater than the access to migration opportu- Tuvalu and 74% in Nauru). This motivates some people to search for new nities. Approximately 10,000 people across Kiribati, Nauru, and Tuvalu homes – either to ensure a source of income or to fi nd land on which to live. attempted to migrate between 2005 and 2015 but were unable to do so, Climate change is already impacting migration patterns in Kiribati and primarily due to fi nancial constraints. Tuvalu. Today, 23% of migrants in Kiribati and 8% in Tuvalu named climate change as a reason for migration decisions. Future impacts of climate change on migration Climate change will drastically impact pressures to migrate, particu- International and internal migration history larly in Kiribati and Tuvalu. More than 70% of households in Kiribati and The potential for Pacifi c households to use international migration to Tuvalu, and 35% in Nauru felt that migration would be a likely response if manage the risks of climate stressors is limited by lack of access to in- droughts, sea level rise or fl oods worsened. Many potential migrants will ternational migration opportunities. The international migration opportu- not have the means to migrate.
[Show full text]
Atoll Research Bulletin No. 392 the Flora of Nauru Rr
ATOLL RESEARCH BULLETIN NO. 392 THE FLORA OF NAURU RR THAMAN, F.R FOSBERG, EL MANNER AND D.C. HASSALL ISSUED BY NATIONAL MUSEUM OF NATURAL J!WTORY SMllTJ!WNIAN INSTlTUTION WASHINGTON, D.C, USA FEBRUARY 1994 DEDICATION We dedicate this Flora of Nauru to Joseph Detsimea Audoa, his family and the people of the Republic of Nauru who have had their precious island and its flora destroyed and degraded as a result of wars and exploitation beyond their control. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to acknowledge, in particular, the late Honorable Joseph Detsimea Audoa, the Minister of Health and Education at the time of the commencement of the study and later Minister of Justice in the Government of Nauru, who, because of his vision and commitment to the culture and environment of Nauru, initiated and provided the financial support for the study of the flora of Nauru. He was particularly concerned that the plants of Nauru and their cultural uses be recorded before such knowledge was lost. We also acknowledge Mr. Lisle Newby, the then Director of Education, who, along with Joe Audoa, were the main supporters of the project, and who provided valuable logistical support throughout. Special thanks are also given to our main local informants and assistants, the Reverend James Aingimea and the late Henry Michael Heine; and to Daphne Fotu, Jacob Gabwinare, Katarina Satto, Kenia Raidinen, Reynold Capelle, Eda Adam and Montiba Star, our main informants in relation to the cultural uses and Nauruan names of plants. Our thanks also go to the Honorable Lawrence Stephen, Minister of Education during part of the project; Obera Menke, Robert Kaierua, Leo Keke, Delilah Capelle, Eddie Borak, John Healy, Gary Bailey, Dennis and Ria Berdinner, Julie Olsson, Dennis Ketner, Sio Fotu, Pine Harrison, John Brechtefeld, Rene Harris, Porthos Bop, Jacob Aroi, Leon Thompson, Benjamin Morgan, Iosefa Elisala and Teaora Tabanou, all of whom contributed in some way to the success of the study.
[Show full text]
Our Development Cooperation with Nauru
Our Development Cooperation with Nauru New Zealand’s ambition for Nauru is a well-governed and resilient country that contributes to the stability and standing of the Pacific region. To achieve this, our engagement is focused on economic resilience and regional values. We work with Nauru to build capacity to address sustainable development challenges, including building an efficient and effective public sector, effectiveness of democratic institutions, and increasing economic and social benefits from being an effective labour sending country. New Zealand’s development assistance to Nauru includes funding for specific activities agreed with the Government of the Republic of Nauru such as support for quality education, increasing renewable energy and strengthening electoral systems. Support is also provided through scholarships, short term training awards, enabling Nauru access to the Recognised Seasonal Employers (RSE) scheme and technical assistance for regional fisheries. Recent achievements In 2019, New Zealand became a member of the Intergenerational Trust Fund for the People of the Republic of Nauru and will make a regular contribution to the Fund until it reaches maturity in 2033. The Fund was established in 2015 to provide future generations with a source of revenue for investments in education, health, environment, and infrastructure development. It is currently on track to reach its capitalisation target. We are providing up to NZD$3.6 million to install 1MW of solar PV to support Nauru’s target of 50% of electricity generation from renewable sources. We expect the project to be complete in 2019. It will address climate change mitigation (by reducing fossil fuels) and climate change resilience (by moving critical generation infrastructure from the vulnerable coastal plain to Topside and adding rainwater harvesting and storage capacity).
[Show full text]
PACIFIC SMALL ISLAND DEVELOPING STATES United
PACIFIC SMALL ISLAND DEVELOPING STATES United Nations Member States Permanent Mission of the Republic of Nauru to the United Nations Phone: 212 -937 -0074 800 Second Avenue, Suite 400A, New York, N.Y. 10017 Fax: 212-937-0079 E-mail: [email protected] Statement by Mr. Jeem Lippwe Deputy Permanent Representative Permanent Mission of the Federated States of Micronesia to the United Nations on behalf of the Pacific Small Island Developing States Eighteenth Session of the Commission on Sustainable Development Thematic Discussion on Transport 4 May 2010 New York Check against delivery Cook Islands, Federated State of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, Niue, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu Thank you Mr. Chairman, I have the honour to speak on behalf of the Pacific Small Island Developing States represented at the United Nations, namely, Fiji, Marshall Islands, Nauru, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, and my own country, Federated States of Micronesia. The theme of transport serves to highlight two of the critical vulnerabilities of the Pacific SIDS. First, we are isolated. Our distance from major markets, coupled with the high cost of fuel is a significant challenge to economic development. Fuel costs on SIDS is especially high. Secondly, we are small, and cannot take advantage of economies of scale in relation to modern container and bulk ships. To provide an example, early this year, the cost of a standard 20-foot container from Nagoya, Japan, to Port Villa, Vanuatu was over four times the cost to Brisbane, Australia, which is a similar geographical distance.
[Show full text]