DOCSLIB.ORG

An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius Thomas M

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius Thomas M Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2004 Small-State Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius Thomas M. Ethridge Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Political Science at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Ethridge, Thomas M., "Small-State Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius" (2004). Masters Theses. 1325. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/1325 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS/FIELD EXPERIENCE PAPER REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates (who have written formal theses) SUBJECT: Permission to Reproduce Theses The University Library is receiving a number of request from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow these to be copied. PLEASE SIGN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that · dings. ~Ju } oy Oat~ 1 I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University NOT allow my thesis to be reproduced because: Author's Signature Date lhesis4.form SMALL-STATE FOREIGN POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF KIRIBATI, NAURU, PALAU, TONGA, TUVALU AND MAURITIUS (TITLE) BY Thomas M. Ethridge THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Arts IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL, EASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY CHARLESTON, ILLINOIS 2004 YEAR I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THIS THESIS BE ACCEPTED AS FULFILLING THIS PART OF THE GRADUATE DEGREE CITED ABOVE t/11 /oy DATE ?J/11/01 DATE - I ABSTRACT Small-state foreign policy is often characterized by the types of alliances that form between small and large states. It is rarely disputed that small states fend for themselves in the global milieu that creates today's societies. Rather, the debate usually begins as to why small states seek strategic alliances with large states. This thesis, on the other hand, questions the very existence of small-state alliances by examining the foreign policy behavior of six small island states. The analysis begins with a quantitative breakdown of United Nation voting behaviors by five Pacific states­ Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, and Tuvalu. Next, a description of the policy behavior that these five states have demonstrated toward environmental issues is explained. Finally, in chapter four the island state of Mauritius, located in the Indian Ocean, is examined for its behavior on three specific issues of foreign policy. Ultimately, the conclusions tend to suggest that no discemable alliances are forming between the selected small states and some of the world's largest powers. Two principle reasons why this thesis suggests its findings to be true are because of the recent trend that small states have exhibited for participating in international organizations, and because of the eminent threat that issues such as global warming place on fragile island ecosystems. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank Dr. Ryan C. Hendrickson for his constant support toward the completion of this work. Serving as my thesis advisor, your encouragement has been immeasurable. Due to your academic advice and occasional verve suggestion, I am happy to call this work my own. In addition, I would like to express my thanks to Dr. David Carwell and Dr. Andrew McNitt for their participation as members on my thesis committee. The time you spent reading through drafts and making suggestions have proven to be extremely helpful. I would like to sincerely thank my entire committee. I also want to express extreme gratitude for the many family and friends who called or stopped by to ask about my progress and make sure that I was keeping on schedule. Without your thoughtfulness I would not have finished this project. In particular, I would like to thank Tom Gilbert, Bill Pedersen, Traci Reiter, as well as my parents and grandparents. TABLE OF CONTENTS IN"TRODUCTION .................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 1: LITERATURE REVIEW AND METHODOLOGY .......................... 6 Literature Review .......................................................................... 6 Methodology ............................................................................... 9 Strengths and Weaknesses ............................................................... 16 Explaining Small States ................................................................. 18 CHAPTER 2: SMALL-STATE VOTIN"G ALLIANCES AT THE U.N .................. 21 Introduction ............................................................................... 21 United Nations Voting Behavior ......................................................... 22 US-Cuban Relations ...................................................................... 23 Nuclear Weapons ......................................................................... 25 Territories/Colonial Issues .............................................................. 27 Human Rights ............................................................................ 28 Middle Eastern Conflicts ................................................................ 30 Combined Analysis ...................................................................... 32 Conclusion ................................................................................ 35 CHAPTER 3: THE ENVIRONMENT: SMALL-STATE FOREIGN POLICY AND IN"TERNA TIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ...................... 36 Introduction ............................................................................... 36 Alliance of Small Island States ......................................................... 38 The Kyoto Protocol. ..................................................................... 42 Pacific Island Forum ..................................................................... 50 Conclusion ................................................................................ 60 CHAPTER 4: THE FOREIGN POLICY OF A SMALL ISLAND STATE IN" THE INDIAN OCEAN ............................................................................ 63 Introduction ............................................................................... 63 History of Mauritius ...................................................................... 63 The Environment. ........................................................................ 65 Iraq ......................................................................................... 68 Diego Garcia .............................................................................. 71 Conclusion ................................................................................. 74 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSION ................................................................... 76 REFERENCES ...................................................................................... 81 SMALL-STATE FOREIGN POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF KIRIBATI, NAURU, PALAU, TONGA, TUVALU AND MAURITIUS INTRODUCTION The academic research concerning small-state foreign policy is quite extensive. In general, this literature suggests that acquiescent relationships usually exist in some form or another when small and large powers interact on a multinational level. Indeed, most analysts concur that small states align with major powers on issues of foreign policy. The purpose of this thesis, consequently, is to determine whether or not similar relationships might be occurring between small island states located in the Pacific and Indian Oceans and some of the world's major powers. In essence, this thesis analyzes the actual foreign policy behavior of six small island states in order to determine whether they are truly seeking alliances with larger states so that they can protect their vulnerabilities. The six small states being examined are (in alphabetical order): the Republic of Kiribati (hereafter Kiribati), Mauritius, the Republic of Nauru (hereafter Nauru), Palau, The Kingdom of Tonga (hereafter Tonga) and Tuvalu. The major powers are: Australia, France, the United Kingdom and the United States. The regions of the Pacific and Indian Oceans were chosen for analysis for four basic reasons. First, there is little scholarly research concerning the areas of the Pacific and Indian Oceans and this represents an under-examined aspect for the study of international relations. Without a doubt, this lack of information necessitates further examination if foreign policy is to be better understood. Second, these regions were selected for their collective value. By taking previous theories of small-state foreign Ethridge policy and testing them against the policies of six island states, it should possible to determine the varying degrees to which such theories are accurate for some of the world's smallest powers. Third, all states included in this thesis were selected due to their growing membership in international organizations such as the United Nations. To be sure, the recent political activity by Mauritius as
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kiribati Bilateral Relations
    India-Kiribati Bilateral Relations Background The concurrent accreditation of Kiribati was transferred to High Commission of India, Suva in October 2011. Prior to that High Commission in Wellington was concurrently accredited to Kiribati from September 1992. High-Level Exchanges FIPIC: The Forum for India-Pacific Island Countries was inaugurated on 19 November 2014 at Suva. Hon’ble Prime Minister of India also hosted the First Summit of the Forum in Suva (Fiji) during his historic visit to Fiji on 19 November 2014. The Forum saw participation of 14 Pacific Island Countries. Kiribati delegation was led by former President Hon. Anote Tong, attended the Summit. FIPIC-II: As a follow-up of the historic first FIPIC Summit in 2014, India organized the second FIPIC at Jaipur on 21 August 2015, which was hosted by Hon’ble Prime Minister Narendra Modi. Building upon the success of the first FIPIC, India announced major initiatives to boost cooperation with the 14 Pacific Island countries. Kiribati delegation led by Mr. Teekoa luta, Advisor on Asia, attended the Forum. Interaction with PSIDS at New York: On 24 September 2019, on the sidelines of the UNGA, Prime Minister of India Hon. Narendra Modi held an interaction, first of its kind, with the leaders of the Pacific Small Island Developing States (PSIDS). This high-level exchange will be followed up with the third Summit meeting of the Forum for India-Pacific Islands Cooperation (FIPIC), which is scheduled to be held in the first half of 2020. India-Pacific Islands Sustainable Development Conference (IPISDC): Government of India organized the India-Pacific Islands Sustainable Development Conference (IPISDC) at Suva, Fiji on 25-26 May 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • New Zealand Aid and the Development of Class in Tonga : An
    Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without the permission of the Author. NEW ZEALAND AID AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF CLASS IN TONGA: AN ANALYSIS OF THE BANANA REHABILITATION SCHEME A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY ANDREW P NEEDS DEPARTMENT OF SOCIOLOGY MASSEY UNIVERSITY FEBRUARY 1988 ii ABSTRACT This thesis examines the bilateral aid relationship between New Zealand and Tonga. Its central purpose is to examine the impact aid is having in transforming Tongan society. This involves a critique of both development theory and of New Zealand government aid principles. The understanding of development and the application of aid by the New Zealand Ministry of Foreign Affairs remains greatly influenced by the modernisation school of thought, which essentially blames certain supposed attributes of Third World peoples for their lack of development. Dependency theorists challenged this view, claiming that Third World poverty was a direct result of First World exploitation through the unequal exchange of commodities. This has had some influence on the use of aid as a developmental tool, but has failed to supercede modernisation theory as the dominant ideology. The theory of articulation of modes of production transcends the problems of both modernisation and dependency schools. Its main thrust is that the capitalist (First World) mode of production does not immediately dominate the non-capitalist (Third World) mode but rather interacts with it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emerging New Zealand Jurisprudence on Climate Change, Disasters and Displacement
    MIGRATION STUDIES VOLUME 3 NUMBER 1 2015 131–142 131 The emerging New Zealand jurisprudence on climate change, disasters and displacement Jane McAdamà *Faculty of Law, University of New South Wales, NSW 2052, Australia. Email: [email protected] Abstract Downloaded from In mid-2014, there was global media coverage of a decision by the New Zealand Immigration and Protection Tribunal, heralded as the first legal recognition of ‘climate change refugees’. Despite the hype, the Tribunal had made no such finding. The case concerned a family of four from the small Pacific island State of Tuvalu, who argued, http://migration.oxfordjournals.org/ among other things, that the effects of climate change—in particular, a lack of fresh drinking water and sea-level rise—would have adverse impacts on them if they were forced to return home. While the Tribunal ultimately permitted them to stay in New Zealand, this was not because of the impacts of climate change in Tuvalu, but rather because of their strong family ties within New Zealand. The decision was based purely on humanitarian and discretionary grounds, not on any domestic or international legal obligation. However, since 2013, New Zealand has started to specifically and systematically delineate the legal protection framework applicable to claims based on the impacts of climate change, natural disasters or environmental degradation. While no one has by guest on March 10, 2015 yet been granted protection on these grounds, New Zealand’s jurisprudence provides the most comprehensive analysis by decision-makers to date about the scope and content of protection for people escaping the impacts of climate change and disasters.
    [Show full text]
  • The Place of Alcohol in the Lives of People from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue
    The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview The place of alcohol in the lives of people from Tokelau, Fiji, Niue, Tonga, Cook Islands and Samoa living in New Zealand: an overview A report prepared by Sector Analysis, Ministry of Health for the Alcohol Advisory Council of New Zealand ALAC Research Monograph Series: No 2 Wellington 1997 ISSN 1174-1856 ISBN 0-477-06317-9 Acknowledgments This particular chapter which is an overview of the reports from each of the six Pacific communities would not have been possible without all the field teams and participants who took part in the project. I would like to thank Ezra Jennings-Pedro, Terrisa Taupe, Tufaina Taupe Sofaia Kamakorewa, Maikali (Mike) Kilioni, Fane Malani, Tina McNicholas, Mere Samusamuvodre, Litimai Rasiga, Tevita Rasiga, Apisa Tuiqere, Ruve Tuivoavoa, Doreen Arapai, Dahlia Naepi, Slaven Naepi, Vili Nosa, Yvette Guttenbeil, Sione Liava’a, Wailangilala Tufui , Susana Tu’inukuafe, Anne Allan-Moetaua, Helen Kapi, Terongo Tekii, Tunumafono Ken Ah Kuoi, Tali Beaton, Myra McFarland, Carmel Peteru, Damas Potoi and their communities who supported them. Many people who have not been named offered comment and shared stories with us through informal discussion. Our families and friends were drawn in and though they did not formally participate they too gave their opinions and helped to shape the information gathered. Special thanks to all the participants and Jean Mitaera, Granby Siakimotu, Kili Jefferson, Dr Ian Prior, Henry Tuia, Lita Foliaki and Tupuola Malifa who reviewed the reports and asked pertinent questions.
    [Show full text]
  • Tokelau the Last Colony?
    Tokelau The last colony? TONY ANGELO (Taupulega) is, and long has been, the governing body. The chairman (Faipule) of the council and a village head ITUATED WELL NORTH OF NEW ZEALAND and (Pulenuku) are elected by universal suffrage in the village SWestern Samoa and close to the equator, the small every three years. The three councils send representatives atolls of Tokelau, with their combined population of about to form the General Fono which is the Tokelau national 1600 people, may well be the last colony of New Zealand. authority; it originally met only once or twice a year and Whether, when and in what way that colonial status of advised the New Zealand Government of Tokelau's Tokelau will end, is a mat- wishes. ter of considerable specula- The General Fono fre- lion. quently repeated advice, r - Kirlb•ll ·::- (Gifb•rr I•) The recently passed lbn•b'a ' ......... both to the New Zealand (Oc: ..n I} Tokelau Amendment Act . :_.. PMtnb 11 Government and to the UN 1996- it received the royal Committee on Decoloni­ • •• roltfl•u assent on 10 June 1996, and 0/tlh.g• sation, that Tokelau did not 1- •, Aotum•- Uu.t (Sw•ln•J · came into force on 1 August 1 f .. • Tllloplol ~~~~~ !•J.. ·-~~~oa wish to change its status ~ ~ 1996 - is but one piece in ' \, vis-a-vis New Zealand. the colourful mosaic of •l . However, in an unexpected Tokelau's constitutional de­ change of position (stimu- velopment. lated no doubt by external The colonialism that factors such as the UN pro­ Tokelau has known has posal to complete its been the British version, and decolonisation business by it has lasted so far for little the year 2000), the Ulu of over a century.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping the Information Environment in the Pacific Island Countries: Disruptors, Deficits, and Decisions
    December 2019 Mapping the Information Environment in the Pacific Island Countries: Disruptors, Deficits, and Decisions Lauren Dickey, Erica Downs, Andrew Taffer, and Heidi Holz with Drew Thompson, S. Bilal Hyder, Ryan Loomis, and Anthony Miller Maps and graphics created by Sue N. Mercer, Sharay Bennett, and Michele Deisbeck Approved for Public Release: distribution unlimited. IRM-2019-U-019755-Final Abstract This report provides a general map of the information environment of the Pacific Island Countries (PICs). The focus of the report is on the information environment—that is, the aggregate of individuals, organizations, and systems that shape public opinion through the dissemination of news and information—in the PICs. In this report, we provide a current understanding of how these countries and their respective populaces consume information. We map the general characteristics of the information environment in the region, highlighting trends that make the dissemination and consumption of information in the PICs particularly dynamic. We identify three factors that contribute to the dynamism of the regional information environment: disruptors, deficits, and domestic decisions. Collectively, these factors also create new opportunities for foreign actors to influence or shape the domestic information space in the PICs. This report concludes with recommendations for traditional partners and the PICs to support the positive evolution of the information environment. This document contains the best opinion of CNA at the time of issue. It does not necessarily represent the opinion of the sponsor or client. Distribution Approved for public release: distribution unlimited. 12/10/2019 Cooperative Agreement/Grant Award Number: SGECPD18CA0027. This project has been supported by funding from the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Tuvalu and Tokelau Drought
    2011 Tokelau and Tuvalu Drought Response LTCOL Terry McDonald Corps of Royal New Zealand Engineers New Zealand Defence Force Presentation Scope • Background and challenges • Deployment overview - OP Pacific Drought 2011 • Key focus areas: • “Humanitarian Assistance as a system of systems” • “Unpacking the problem” • “Information in a vacuum” • Conclusion Background and Challenges • Slow developing situation • Increasing development increases water use • Impact of La Nina on preceding six months rainfall • Reliance on rainwater capture and RO • Geographic Isolation – airfields / ports • Mission duration and footprint • NZDF MFRO capability Deployment overview – OP Pacific Drought 2011 Key Events Timeline: 28 Sep 11 – Tuvalu declares a state of emergency Sep 11 – Tokelau declares a state of emergency 30 Sep 11 – NZDF activates condition white OP Pacific Drought 04 Oct 11 – NZDF activates condition red OP Pacific Drought 05 Oct 11 – NZDF team TOKELAU deploys to AMERICAN SAMOA 06 Oct 11 – NZDF team TOKELAU links up with USCG WALNUT 07 Oct 11 – NZDF team TUVALU deploys to SAMOA 07 Oct 11 – Relief team TOKELAU arrives TOKELAU 08 Oct 11 – Relief team TUVALU arrives TUVALU 10 Oct 11 – Relief team TOKELAU RTNZ via AMERICAN SAMOA 09 Nov 11 – Relief team TUVLAU RTNZ via SAMOA Key Outcomes: TOKELAU – 123,000L of water produced and delivered to three atolls Distribution amount based on population TUVALU - 798,480L of water produced by NZDF MFRO Distribution primarily on Funafuti with Red Cross RO supporting NUKULAELAE References: http://www.tokelau.org.nz/site/tokelau/files/final%20final%20final%20tevakai%20NC.pdf
    [Show full text]
  • International Law and the 2003 Invasion of Iraq Revisited
    International Law and the 2003 Invasion of Iraq Revisited Donald K. Anton Associate Professor of Law The Australian National University College of Law Paper delivered April 30, 2013 Australian National University Asia-Pacific College of Diplomacy The Invasion of Iraq: Canadian and Australian Perspectives Seminar1 INTRODUCTION Good morning. Thank you to the organizers for inviting me to participate today in this retrospective on the 2003 invasion of Iraq. My role this morning, as I understand it, is to parse the international legal arguments surrounding the invasion and to reconsider them in the fullness of time that has elapsed. It is a role I agreed to take on with hesitation because it is difficult to add much that is new. I suppose I can take comfort in saying what I’ve already said, and saying it again today, because of how I view my obligations as an international lawyer. I believe we lawyers have a duty to stand up and insist that our leaders adhere to the rule of law in international relations and to help ensure that they are held accountable for the failure to do so. As I am sure you are all aware, much remains to be done in terms of accountability, especially in the United States, and it is disappointing that the Obama Administration has so far refused to prosecute what seem to be clear violations of the Torture Convention, including all the way up the chain of command if necessary. Today, however, my talk is confined to the legal arguments about the use of force in Iraq and an analysis of their persuasiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • Kiribati from the Least Developed Country Category
    Department of Economic and Social Affairs Secretariat of the Committee for Development Policy Ex-ante impact assessment of likely consequences of graduation of the Republic of Kiribati from the least developed country category United Nations, New York, October 2008 1 Impact assessment: Kiribati Table of contents Impact Assessment: Kiribati........................................................................................................... 3 Summary........................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Background ............................................................................................................................... 3 2. Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 4 3. Special support measures due to LDC status......................................................................... 6 3.1. World Trade Organization related benefits.................................................................... 6 3.2. LDC status and preferential market access..................................................................... 7 3.2.1. Main products and markets....................................................................................... 7 3.3. Support measures related to capacity building in trade .............................................. 14 3.4. Official Development Assistance .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Provisional Agenda As of 25/06/2021 Morning
    All times CEST 6 pages Provisional Agenda as of 25/06/2021 morning 28 June 2021 First SIDS Leaders Dialogue: The Vision for a Healthy Resilient Future 10:00–11:00 CEST Summit opening video Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General, WHO H.E. Taneti Maamau, President of Kiribati H.E. Frank Bainimarama, Prime Minister of Fiji H.E. Pravind Kumar Jugnauth, Prime Minister of Mauritius H.E. Georges Rebelo Pinto Chikoti, Secretary-General, Organization of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (OACPS) Milikini Failautusi, Health Worker and Tuvalu advocate (video statement) Mr Yannick Glemarec, Executive Director, Green Climate Fund H.E. (Ms) Amina Mohammed, UN Deputy Secretary-General (Video statement) Moderator: Femi Oke All times CEST 6 pages Provisional Agenda as of 25/06/2021 morning 28 June 2021 Panel 1: Tackling the NCD and mental health crises for healthier SIDS 15:00 – 16:20 CEST Chaired by Dr Matshidiso Moeti, Regional Director, African Region, WHO Minister of Health, Cabo Verde Chief Medical Officer, Dominica Assistant Undersecretary of Health, Bahrain Deputy Minister of Health, Portugal Katie Dain, Chief Executive Officer, NCD Alliance Dr Adriana Blanco Marquizo, Head of the Convention Secretariat, WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Panel 2: Advancing equitable access to NCDs and mental health services through primary health care 16:30 – 17:50 CEST Chaired by Dr Hans Kluge, Regional Director, European Region, WHO Minister of Health, Belize Minster of Health, Barbados Minister of Health, Dominican Republic Minister
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Detention in Nauru
    Immigration Detention in Nauru March 2016 The Republic of Nauru, a tiny South Pacific island nation that has a total area of 21 square kilometres, is renowned for being one of the smallest countries in the world, having a devastated natural environment due to phosphate strip-mining, and operating a controversial offshore processing centre for Australia that has confined asylum seeking men, women, and children. Considered an Australian “client state” by observers, Nauru reported in 2015 that “the major source of revenue for the Government now comes from the operation of the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru.”1 Pointing to the numerous alleged abuses that have occurred to detainees on the island, a writer for the Guardian opined in October 2015 that the country had “become the symbol of the calculated cruelty, of the contradictions, and of the unsustainability of Australia’s $3bn offshore detention regime.”2 Nauru, which joined the United Nations in 1999, initially drew global attention for its migration policies when it finalised an extraterritorial cooperation deal with Australia to host an asylum seeker detention centre in 2001. This deal, which was inspired by U.S. efforts to interdict Haitian and Cuban asylum seekers in the Caribbean, was part of what later became known as Australia’s first “Pacific Solution” migrant deterrence policy, which involved intercepting and transferring asylum seekers arriving by sea—dubbed “irregular maritime arrivals” (IMAs)—to “offshore processing centres” in Nauru and Manus Island, Papua New Guinea.3 As part of this initial Pacific Solution, which lasted until 2008, the Nauru offshore processing centre was managed by the International Migration Organisation (IOM).
    [Show full text]
  • The Bush Revolution: the Remaking of America's Foreign Policy
    The Bush Revolution: The Remaking of America’s Foreign Policy Ivo H. Daalder and James M. Lindsay The Brookings Institution April 2003 George W. Bush campaigned for the presidency on the promise of a “humble” foreign policy that would avoid his predecessor’s mistake in “overcommitting our military around the world.”1 During his first seven months as president he focused his attention primarily on domestic affairs. That all changed over the succeeding twenty months. The United States waged wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. U.S. troops went to Georgia, the Philippines, and Yemen to help those governments defeat terrorist groups operating on their soil. Rather than cheering American humility, people and governments around the world denounced American arrogance. Critics complained that the motto of the United States had become oderint dum metuant—Let them hate as long as they fear. September 11 explains why foreign policy became the consuming passion of Bush’s presidency. Once commercial jetliners plowed into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, it is unimaginable that foreign policy wouldn’t have become the overriding priority of any American president. Still, the terrorist attacks by themselves don’t explain why Bush chose to respond as he did. Few Americans and even fewer foreigners thought in the fall of 2001 that attacks organized by Islamic extremists seeking to restore the caliphate would culminate in a war to overthrow the secular tyrant Saddam Hussein in Iraq. Yet the path from the smoking ruins in New York City and Northern Virginia to the battle of Baghdad was not the case of a White House cynically manipulating a historic catastrophe to carry out a pre-planned agenda.
    [Show full text]