DOCSLIB.ORG

Pacific Islands REGIONAL REPORT

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Pacific Islands REGIONAL REPORT United Nations Environment Programme Chemicals Pacific Islands REGIONAL REPORT Regionally Based Assessment of Persistent Available from: UNEP Chemicals 11-13, chemin des Anémones CH-1219 Châtelaine, GE Switzerland Phone : +41 22 917 1234 Fax : +41 22 797 3460 Substances E-mail: [email protected] December 2002 http://www.chem.unep.ch UNEP Chemicals is a part of UNEP's Technology, Industry and Printed at United Nations, Geneva Economics Division GE.03-00161–January 2003–300 UNEP/CHEMICALS/2003/9 Global Environment Facility UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME CHEMICALS RReeggiioonnaallllyy BBaasseedd AAsssseessssmmeenntt ooff PPeerrssiisstteenntt TTooxxiicc SSuubbssttaanncceess American Samoa, Cook Islands, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, French Polynesia, Guam, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Nauru, New Caledonia, Niue, Northern Mariana Islands, Palau, Pitcairn Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tokelau, Tonga, Tuvalu, Vanuatu, Wallis and Futuna, Other US territories PPAACCIIFFIICC IISSLLAANNDDSS RREEGGIIOONNAALL RREEPPOORRTT DECEMBER 2002 GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY This report was financed by the Global Environment Facility (GEF) through a global project with co- financing from the Governments of Australia, France, Sweden, Switzerland and the United States of America. This publication is produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC). This publication is intended to serve as a guide. While the information provided is believed to be accurate, UNEP disclaim any responsibility for the possible inaccuracies or omissions and consequences, which may flow from them. UNEP nor any individual involved in the preparation of this report shall be liable for any injury, loss, damage or prejudice of any kind that may be caused by any persons who have acted based on their understanding of the information contained in this publication. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this report do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations of UNEP concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals (IOMC), was established in 1995 by UNEP, ILO, FAO, WHO, UNIDO and OECD (Participating Organizations), following recommendations made by the 1992 UN Conference on Environment and Development to strengthen cooperation and increase coordination in the field of chemical safety. In January 1998, UNITAR formally joined the IOMC as a Participating Organization. The purpose of the IOMC is to promote coordination of the policies and activities pursued by the Participating Organizations, jointly or separately, to achieve the sound management of chemicals in relation to human health and the environment. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted but acknowledgement is requested together with a reference to the document. A copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint should be sent to UNEP Chemicals. UNEP CHEMICALS UNEP Chemicals11-13, chemin des Anémones CH-1219 Châtelaine, GE Switzerland Phone: +41 22 917 8170 Fax: +41 22 797 3460 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.chem.unep.ch UNEP Chemicals is a part of UNEP’s Technology, Industry and Economics Division ii TABLE OF CONTENTS PREFACE.................................................................................................................... VI EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................... VIII 1 INTRODUCTION ...............................................................................................1 1.1 OVERVIEW OF THE RBA PTS PROJECT .............................................................................1 1.1.1 Objectives ...............................................................................................................................1 1.1.2 Results.....................................................................................................................................1 1.2 METHODOLOGY .....................................................................................................................2 1.2.1 Regional Divisions..................................................................................................................2 1.2.2 Management Structure............................................................................................................2 1.2.3 Data Processing.......................................................................................................................2 1.2.4 Project Funding.......................................................................................................................2 1.3 DEFINITIONS OF PTS CHEMICALS .....................................................................................2 1.3.1 - Pesticides..............................................................................................................................3 1.3.2 - Industrial compounds ...........................................................................................................6 1.3.3 - Unintended by-products .......................................................................................................6 1.3.4 - Regional specific..................................................................................................................6 1.4 DEFINITION OF THE PACIFIC REGION ............................................................................10 1.5 PHYSICAL SETTING.............................................................................................................10 1.5.1 Regional Diversity................................................................................................................10 1.5.2 The role of the ocean.............................................................................................................10 1.5.3 Geographical Variations: High Islands and Low Atolls.......................................................11 1.5.4 Population Variations...........................................................................................................11 1.5.5 New health concerns.............................................................................................................12 1.5.6 Fragile economies .................................................................................................................13 2 SOURCE CHARACTERISATION.................................................................14 2.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION TO PTS SOURCES ........................................................14 2.1.1 Pesticides ..............................................................................................................................14 2.1.2 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) .......................................................................................14 2.1.3 Organolead Compounds .......................................................................................................14 2.1.4 Dioxins, furans and other unintentional byproducts.............................................................14 2.1.5 Organtin Compounds............................................................................................................15 2.1.6 Other PTS Chemicals............................................................................................................15 2.2 DATA COLLECTION AND QUALITY CONTROL ISSUES...............................................15 2.3 PRODUCTION, USE AND EMISSION..................................................................................15 2.3.1 Current Pesticide Use............................................................................................................15 2.3.2 Emissions of Unintentional Byproducts ...............................................................................15 2.3.3 Other PTS Chemicals............................................................................................................16 2.4 HOT SPOTS.............................................................................................................................16 2.5 DATA GAPS............................................................................................................................17 2.6 SUMMARY OF THE MOST SIGNIFICANT REGIONAL SOURCES ................................17 2.7 CONCLUSIONS ......................................................................................................................17 iii 3 ENVIRONMENTAL LEVELS, TOXICOLOGY AND ECOTOXICOLOGY PATTERNS ..................................................................19 3.1 LEVELS AND TRENDS.........................................................................................................19 3.1.1 ANALYSIS BY INDIVIDUAL PTS ...................................................................................19 3.1.2 PTS IN PICs BY SAMPLE TYPE .......................................................................................20 3.1.3 Trends ...................................................................................................................................24 3.2 TOXICOLOGY OF PTS OF REGIONAL CONCERN...........................................................24 3.2.1 Toxicology by Individual PTS and Toxicological Data in the Pacific Islands...............................25
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania
    The Political, Security, and Climate Landscape in Oceania Prepared for the US Department of Defense’s Center for Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance May 2020 Written by: Jonah Bhide Grace Frazor Charlotte Gorman Claire Huitt Christopher Zimmer Under the supervision of Dr. Joshua Busby 2 Table of Contents Executive Summary 3 United States 8 Oceania 22 China 30 Australia 41 New Zealand 48 France 53 Japan 61 Policy Recommendations for US Government 66 3 Executive Summary Research Question The current strategic landscape in Oceania comprises a variety of complex and cross-cutting themes. The most salient of which is climate change and its impact on multilateral political networks, the security and resilience of governments, sustainable development, and geopolitical competition. These challenges pose both opportunities and threats to each regionally-invested government, including the United States — a power present in the region since the Second World War. This report sets out to answer the following questions: what are the current state of international affairs, complexities, risks, and potential opportunities regarding climate security ​ issues and geostrategic competition in Oceania? And, what policy recommendations and approaches should the US government explore to improve its regional standing and secure its national interests? The report serves as a primer to explain and analyze the region’s state of affairs, and to discuss possible ways forward for the US government. Given that we conducted research from August 2019 through May 2020, the global health crisis caused by the novel coronavirus added additional challenges like cancelling fieldwork travel. However, the pandemic has factored into some of the analysis in this report to offer a first look at what new opportunities and perils the United States will face in this space.
    [Show full text]
  • Immigration Detention in Nauru
    Immigration Detention in Nauru March 2016 The Republic of Nauru, a tiny South Pacific island nation that has a total area of 21 square kilometres, is renowned for being one of the smallest countries in the world, having a devastated natural environment due to phosphate strip-mining, and operating a controversial offshore processing centre for Australia that has confined asylum seeking men, women, and children. Considered an Australian “client state” by observers, Nauru reported in 2015 that “the major source of revenue for the Government now comes from the operation of the Regional Processing Centre in Nauru.”1 Pointing to the numerous alleged abuses that have occurred to detainees on the island, a writer for the Guardian opined in October 2015 that the country had “become the symbol of the calculated cruelty, of the contradictions, and of the unsustainability of Australia’s $3bn offshore detention regime.”2 Nauru, which joined the United Nations in 1999, initially drew global attention for its migration policies when it finalised an extraterritorial cooperation deal with Australia to host an asylum seeker detention centre in 2001. This deal, which was inspired by U.S. efforts to interdict Haitian and Cuban asylum seekers in the Caribbean, was part of what later became known as Australia’s first “Pacific Solution” migrant deterrence policy, which involved intercepting and transferring asylum seekers arriving by sea—dubbed “irregular maritime arrivals” (IMAs)—to “offshore processing centres” in Nauru and Manus Island, Papua New Guinea.3 As part of this initial Pacific Solution, which lasted until 2008, the Nauru offshore processing centre was managed by the International Migration Organisation (IOM).
    [Show full text]
  • The Pacific Solution Or a Pacific Nightmare?: the Difference Between Burden Shifting and Responsibility Sharing
    THE PACIFIC SOLUTION OR A PACIFIC NIGHTMARE?: THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN BURDEN SHIFTING AND RESPONSIBILITY SHARING Dr. Savitri Taylor* I. INTRODUCTION II. THE PACIFIC SOLUTION III. OFFSHORE PROCESSING CENTERS AND STATE RESPONSIBILITY IV. PACIFIC NIGHTMARES A. Nauru B. Papua New Guinea V. INTERPRETING NIGHTMARES VI. SPREADING NIGHTMARES VII. SHARING RESPONSIBILITY VIII. CONCLUSION I. INTRODUCTION The guarantee that persons unable to enjoy human rights in their country of nationality, who seek asylum in other countries, will not be returned to the country from which they fled is a significant achievement of international efforts to validate the assertion that those rights truly are the “rights of man.” There are currently 145 states,1 including Australia, that are parties to the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugees Convention)2 and/or the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees (Refugees Protocol).3 The prohibition on refoulement is the key provision of the Refugees Convention. Article 33(1) of the Refugees Convention provides that no state party “shall expel or return (refouler) a refugee in any manner * Senior Lecturer, School of Law, La Trobe University, Victoria 3086, Australia. 1 As of February 1, 2004. 2 July 28, 1951, 1954 Austl. T. S. No. 5 (entered into force for Australia and generally on April 22, 1954). 3 January 31, 1967, 1973 Austl. T. S. No. 37 (entered into force generally on October 4, 1967, and for Australia on December 13, 1973). 2 ASIAN-PACIFIC LAW & POLICY JOURNAL; Vol. 6, Issue 1 (Winter
    [Show full text]
  • Download Pacwasteplus Project Snapshot-Nauru
    PACWASTEPLUS PROJECT SNAPSHOT December 2020 ISBN: 978-982-04-0929-3 The PacWastePlus programme is being implemented across 14 Pacific island countries and Timor-Leste, and will address both the cost-effective and sustainable management of waste and pollution in the priority waste streams of: • Hazardous wastes (asbestos, healthcare waste, and e-waste) • Solid wastes (organic waste, disaster waste, bulky waste, and recyclables) • related aspects of Wastewater The programme will deliver positive social and environmental outcomes from the effective management of waste in the Pacific. PacWastePlus activities are tailored to address the specific needs of each country based on their identified priorities. Nauru is one of the 15 countries participating in the PacWastePlus programme. Nauru is a single coral island located in the Nauru has a limited land area and a stressed Micronesia region of the central Pacific. It environment following decades of destruction comprises of 14 districts, covering a land area of caused by years of mining on most parts of the 21km2, making it the smallest island nation in the island. Population growth and growth of the Pacific. Its exclusive economic zone covers an refugee centre may result in further oceanic area of 320,000km2. Nauru has no official environmental degradation. capital, although most government offices are located in Yaren, home to approximately 8% of the 10,293 population . Located near the equator and as such Nauru Nauru’s population had been growing until the experiences extreme weather events including collapse of the phosphate mining industry in 2006 drought. Prolonged droughts are forecast to cause which resulted in the return of I-Kiribati and problems to groundwater lenses, and eventually Tuvaluan workers to their home countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Sea Level Amplitude Analysis Over the North Pacific Ocean Coast by Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition Method
    remote sensing Technical Note Annual Sea Level Amplitude Analysis over the North Pacific Ocean Coast by Ensemble Empirical Mode Decomposition Method Wen-Hau Lan 1 , Chung-Yen Kuo 2 , Li-Ching Lin 3 and Huan-Chin Kao 2,* 1 Department of Communications, Navigation and Control Engineering, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Department of Geomatics, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 70101, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Department of System Engineering and Naval Architecture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung 20224, Taiwan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +886-06-275-7575 (ext. 63833-818) Abstract: Understanding spatial and temporal changes of seasonal sea level cycles is important because of direct influence on coastal systems. The annual sea level cycle is substantially larger than semi-annual cycle in most parts of the ocean. Ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD) method has been widely used to study tidal component, long-term sea level rise, and decadal sea level variation. In this work, EEMD is used to analyze the observed monthly sea level anomalies and detect annual cycle characteristics. Considering that the variations of the annual sea level variation in the Northeast Pacific Ocean are poorly studied, the trend and characteristics of annual sea level amplitudes and related mechanisms in the North Pacific Ocean are investigated using long-term tide gauge records covering 1950–2016. The average annual amplitude of coastal sea level exhibits interannual-to-decadal variability within the range of 14–220 mm. The largest value of ~174 mm is observed in the west coast of South China Sea.
    [Show full text]
  • Situation Analysis of Children in Nauru ©United Nations Children’S Fund (UNICEF), Pacific Office, Suva
    28 Logo signature RECOMMENDED VERSIONS The ideal treatment for our logo is inside a cyan container . This helps reinforce the relationship between our logo and our brand colour and enhances legibility when placed over photographs and graphics. Logo signature aligned from bottom Logo signature centred of container suitable to be anchored in circular container at the top right corner (see next page) ALTERNATIVE VERSIONS Logo signature Logo signature Logo signature Horizontal logo signature centred in container aligned from top of centred in container centred in short container container UNICEF Brand Book l May 2018 Situation Analysis of Children in Nauru ©United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), Pacific Office, Suva December 2017 This report was written by Kirsten Anderson, Ruth Barnes, Awaz Raoof and Carolyn Hamilton, with the assistance of Laura Mertsching, Jorun Arndt, Karin Frode, Safya Benniche and Kristiana Papi. Maurice Dunaiski contributed to the chapters on Health and WASH. Further revision to the Child Protection chapter was done by Shelley Casey. The report was commissioned by UNICEF Pacific, which engaged Coram International, at Coram Children’s Legal Centre, to finalize Situation Analysis of Nauru. The Situational Analyses were managed by a Steering Committee within UNICEF Pacific and UNICEF EAPRO, whose members included Andrew Colin Parker; Gerda Binder (EAPRO); Iosefo Volau; Laisani Petersen; Lemuel Fyodor Villamar; Maria Carmelita Francois; Settasak Akanimart; Stanley Gwavuya (Vice Chair), Stephanie Kleschnitzki (EAPRO); Uma Palaniappan; Vathinee Jitjaturunt (Chair); and Waqairapoa Tikoisuva. The contents of the report do not necessarily reflect the policies or views of UNICEF. UNICEF accepts no responsibility for error. Any part of this publication may be freely reproduced with appropriate acknowledgement.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius Thomas M
    Eastern Illinois University The Keep Masters Theses Student Theses & Publications 2004 Small-State Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius Thomas M. Ethridge Eastern Illinois University This research is a product of the graduate program in Political Science at Eastern Illinois University. Find out more about the program. Recommended Citation Ethridge, Thomas M., "Small-State Foreign Policy: An Analysis of Kiribati, Nauru, Palau, Tonga, Tuvalu and Mauritius" (2004). Masters Theses. 1325. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/1325 This is brought to you for free and open access by the Student Theses & Publications at The Keep. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of The Keep. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THESIS/FIELD EXPERIENCE PAPER REPRODUCTION CERTIFICATE TO: Graduate Degree Candidates (who have written formal theses) SUBJECT: Permission to Reproduce Theses The University Library is receiving a number of request from other institutions asking permission to reproduce dissertations for inclusion in their library holdings. Although no copyright laws are involved, we feel that professional courtesy demands that permission be obtained from the author before we allow these to be copied. PLEASE SIGN ONE OF THE FOLLOWING STATEMENTS: Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University has my permission to lend my thesis to a reputable college or university for the purpose of copying it for inclusion in that · dings. ~Ju } oy Oat~ 1 I respectfully request Booth Library of Eastern Illinois University NOT allow my thesis to be reproduced because: Author's Signature Date lhesis4.form SMALL-STATE FOREIGN POLICY: AN ANALYSIS OF KIRIBATI, NAURU, PALAU, TONGA, TUVALU AND MAURITIUS (TITLE) BY Thomas M.
    [Show full text]
  • Getting to Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands
    Getting to Majuro, Republic of the Marshall Islands Airport • Majuro is served by the Amata Kabua International Airport with the call letters MAJ . • Airport Tax: A departure fee of $20.00 U.S. is required except for children less than 12 years old and adults over 60 years old. Airlines The two main airlines servicing the Marshall Islands from abroad are: • United Airlines. United operates between Asia and Honolulu and provides a connection to the Marshall Islands in both directions on what is affectionately named the “Island Hopper”. The route is Honolulu direct to Majuro (4.5 hours), or Guam to Majuro with four quick “hops” (8 hours). • Nauru Airlines. Nauru Airlines operates between Australia and the Marshall Islands and also connects with Nauru and Kiribati. Immigration • U.S., Palau, and FSM Citizens are exempt from Visas with a valid Passport. • A 30-day visa-on-arrival will be granted for citizens of Australia and New Zealand, Canada, European Union (includes United Kingdom), South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and the Philippines with the proper paperwork. • All others should use the following procedure: 1. Generally, an application for a visa should consist of the following: i. Completed application form (with two recent passport size photos) ii. Passport (valid for at least 6 months) iii. Supporting documents: (i) Letter from applicant – stating the purpose and duration of visit (ii) Police record – must be dated within last 3 months (iii) Health clearance – must show person is free from HIV/AIDS and TB; dated within last 3 months (iv) Receipt – to show payment of application fee 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 36D. South Pacific Ocean
    Chapter 36D. South Pacific Ocean Contributors: Karen Evans (lead author), Nic Bax (convener), Patricio Bernal (Lead member), Marilú Bouchon Corrales, Martin Cryer, Günter Försterra, Carlos F. Gaymer, Vreni Häussermann, and Jake Rice (Co-Lead member and Editor Part VI Biodiversity) 1. Introduction The Pacific Ocean is the Earth’s largest ocean, covering one-third of the world’s surface. This huge expanse of ocean supports the most extensive and diverse coral reefs in the world (Burke et al., 2011), the largest commercial fishery (FAO, 2014), the most and deepest oceanic trenches (General Bathymetric Chart of the Oceans, available at www.gebco.net), the largest upwelling system (Spalding et al., 2012), the healthiest and, in some cases, largest remaining populations of many globally rare and threatened species, including marine mammals, seabirds and marine reptiles (Tittensor et al., 2010). The South Pacific Ocean surrounds and is bordered by 23 countries and territories (for the purpose of this chapter, countries west of Papua New Guinea are not considered to be part of the South Pacific), which range in size from small atolls (e.g., Nauru) to continents (South America, Australia). Associated populations of each of the countries and territories range from less than 10,000 (Tokelau, Nauru, Tuvalu) to nearly 30.5 million (Peru; Population Estimates and Projections, World Bank Group, accessed at http://data.worldbank.org/data-catalog/population-projection-tables, August 2014). Most of the tropical and sub-tropical western and central South Pacific Ocean is contained within exclusive economic zones (EEZs), whereas vast expanses of temperate waters are associated with high seas areas (Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • 'Pacific Destiny' and American Policy in Samoa, 1872-1899
    'Pacific Destiny' and American Policy in Samoa, 1872-1899 Stuart Anderson American involvement in Samoa in the late 19th Century constitutes one of the most extraordinary episodes in the diplomatic history of the United States.1 During a period of intense opposition to foreign entanglements and overseas expansion, the United States was embroiled in the affairs of a remote island group where American strategic interests were almost nonexistent and the American economic stake was insigni- ficant. At a time when the expansive policies of William H. Seward and Ulysses S. Grant were handily defeated in the Congress, the Alaska treaty was ridiculed, James G. Blaine's pan-Americanism ended in failure, and Hawaiian annexation remained a task for the future, the United States was ready to enter into agreements regarding Samoa that constituted, in a sense, the nation's first entangling alliance since the French treaty of 1778.2 Yet it is still far from clear what attracted American interest to Samoa. The standard diplomatic history textbooks offer no convincing explanation; all would seem to agree with Thomas A. Bailey that "there was something remarkable about the determination of the United States, ten years before the Spanish-American War, to go to the very brink of hostilities with Germany rather than yield negligible commercial and questionable strategic advantages in faraway Samoa."3 Clearly the United States had no vital interests in the Samoan archipe- lago. Why she was so deeply involved in that part of the world for almost 30 years has remained, therefore, a mystery. It is the contention of this essay that United States involvement in Samoa can be explained only in terms of the idea of America's Pacific destiny that existed in the minds of American policy makers.
    [Show full text]
  • THE PACIFIC ISLANDS Part III: Micronesia by Donald M
    SOUTHEAST ASIA SERIES Vol. XXV No. 4 (Micronesia) THE PACIFIC ISLANDS Part III: Micronesia by Donald M. Topping March 1977 Micronesia. The tiny islands. The Lilliput of its broadest sense are not synonymous. Cultural Oceania lying just north of the equator, some of Micronesia would have to include the Gilbert whose citizens are now trying to tie down their Islands and Nauru, which are not part of the TTPI. Gulliver. For the past 31 years, Gulliver has been If the Marianas are to be considered Micronesian the United States government, first through its (some would argue on linguistic grounds that they Department of Navy (1944-1951), and later through are not), we must include Guam in Cultural Micro- the Department of Interior, with close supervision nesia but not as part of the TTPI. The TTPI also and support from the Departments of Defense and includes two inhabited atolls whose people are pure State, and the CIA. While there have been three Polynesian (Kapingamarangi and Nukuoro). When previous Gullivers, none has the unique relation- most people today (excluding anthropologists and ship that the United States has had with the linguists) use the term Micronesia, they mean the 123,000 inhabitants (1973) of the Trust Territory of TTPI, which is the way we shall use the term in this the Pacific Islands (as the islands are known offi- paper to include the Caroline, Marshall, and cially). Mariana Islands, but excluding Guam. The more than two thousand islands of Micro- The first of the 2,241 islands of Micronesia to be nesia are indeed small, appearing as mere specks visited by a European were the Marianas, when on wall-sized maps.
    [Show full text]
  • 2002 04 Small Is Viable.Pdf
    The U.S. Congress established the East-West Center in 1960 to foster mutual understanding and coopera- tion among the governments and peoples of the Asia Pacific region including the United States. Funding for the Center comes from the U.S. govern- ment with additional support provided by private agencies, individuals, corporations, and Asian and Pacific governments. East-West Center Working Papers are circulated for comment and to inform interested colleagues about work in progress at the Center. For more information about the Center or to order publications, contact: Publication Sales Office East-West Center 1601 East-West Road Honolulu, Hawaii 96848-1601 Telephone: 808-944-7145 Facsimile: 808-944-7376 Email: [email protected] Website: www.EastWestCenter.org EAST-WEST CENTER WORKING PAPERSPAPERSEAST-WEST Pacific Islands Development SeriesSeriesPacific No. 15, April 2002 Small is Viable: The Global Ebbs and Flows of a Pacific Atoll Nation Gerard A. Finin Gerard A. Finin is a Senior Fellow in the Pacific Islands Development Program, East-West Center. He can be reached at telephone: 808-944-7751 or email: [email protected]. East-West Center Working Papers: Pacific Islands Development Series is an unreviewed and unedited prepublication series reporting on research in progress. The views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the Center. Please direct orders and requests to the East-West Center's Publication Sales Office. The price for Working Papers is $3.00 each plus postage. For surface mail, add $3.00 for the first title plus $0.75 for each additional title or copy sent in the same shipment.
    [Show full text]