DOCSLIB.ORG

Arthropod Predation in Brassica Agroecosystems: Effects of Latitude, Community Composition, and Diet Breadth a Dissertation SUBM

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arthropod Predation in Brassica Agroecosystems: Effects of Latitude, Community Composition, and Diet Breadth a Dissertation SUBM Arthropod Predation in Brassica Agroecosystems: Effects of Latitude, Community Composition, and Diet Breadth A Dissertation SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY Hannah Louise Gray IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY David A. Andow (Advisor) George E. Heimpel (Co-Advisor) April 2020 © Hannah L. Gray, 2020 Acknowledgements This dissertation represents the culmination of almost six years of learning, growing, and living. I would like to express my immense gratitude to my advisor and mentor Dave Andow. He never took no for answer, because he believed I could do whatever was needed, even when I doubted myself. He supported me through all my ideas and diversions and provided wisdom and perspective to get back on course. I am also extremely thankful for the steady support of my co-advisor George Heimpel. He welcomed me into his lab community and provided invaluable insights into my research and academic life. I would also like to extend my deepest gratitude to Dr. Débora Pires Paula for her mentorship and guidance. Her enthusiasm and eagerness to support my work in Brazil and in the molecular lab was limitless and pushed me to be a better scientist. To the Ecology Group and EMBRAPA-Cenargen in Brasília, this work would not have been possible without your participation. I am especially thankful for my mentor at EMBRAPA, Edison Sujii who facilitated my fieldwork helped me navigate the complex process of doing research abroad. I could not have pulled off my work at EMBRAPA without Lucas Machado de Souza and Alex Cortês, who provided unwavering guidance and friendship in the field. I would also like to thank my collaborators in the latitudinal transect experiment, Madelaine Venzon, Jorge Torres, Juliano Farias, Rafael Aita, and Luan Rodrigues. Thank you for taking on my “dummy” experiment and helping me answer important questions in places I could not physically visit myself. I would also like to acknowledge my appreciation for Alfried Vogler and his research group at Imperial College, London. Alfried welcomed me into his lab on short notice and made sure that my time in the Beetle Lab was productive and engaging. Though my stay was brief, the warmth and good humor among my friends in the Beetle Lab set me up for success interpreting my molecular data. I’d like to thank my committee members, Marla Spivak and Elizabeth Borer, who provided critical perspectives on my research and kept me pushing further with my questions. I am grateful for the time they have invested in my development as a scientist. I am also grateful for the funding I received throughout graduate school. Without these crucial resources neither my development as a scientist nor this research would have been i possible. Within the University of Minnesota, I thank the Department of Entomology, the International Center for Global Change, the Graduate Student Board of the College of Food, Agriculture, and Natural Resource Sciences, the Graduate School, and the MnDRIVE Global Food Ventures and Bioinformatics programs. I am also immensely grateful for the support I received from USAID’s Borlaug Fellows Program to conduct my research in Brazil and from EPA STAR Fellows Program which supported three years of my education. To my friends and colleagues, I thank you for your research, academic and moral support over the years: Kathleen Barrett, Rafaela Mendes Assunção, Michely Aquino, Gabriel Borges, Becky Boulton, Julia Brokaw, Elizabeth Brosius, Mariana Bulgarella, Carla Caixeta, Jonathan Dregni, Monika Egerer, Angelina Ceballos-Escalera Fernández, Fionna Gault, Marla Hassemer, Zafar Iqbal, Joe Kaser, Matt Kaiser, Diego Magalhães, James Miksanek, Hannah Norman, Liz Perkus, Sharon Perrone, Milan Plecas, Gowri Prakesh, Kristina Prescott, Ismael Ramierez, Elise Rosengren, Mary Marek-Spartz, Eric Middleton, Maggie Shanahan, Carl Stenoien, Marissa Streifel, Anh Tran, Chawatat Thanoosing, Vivian Waters, J.J. Weiss, and Jake Wittman. Your collective love of science and insects heartened me in times of struggle and got me to where I am today. I am deeply grateful to my parents David and Brenda Rowley Gray. From an early age they raised me to be curious and confident exploring new places and ideas. I appreciate my sister, Rachel Gray, for her continued love and interest in my research, despite her strong aversion to insects and all things ‘creepy’. I extend thanks to my cousin Tommy Saller, who proceeded me in the Ph.D. process and helped me navigate the academic maze with humor and wisdom. I’d like to thank my partner Randall Beaman, for grounding me in reality and supporting me on this entomological adventure. Finally, I would like to express my heartfelt gratitude to the farmers who hosted this research with patience, curiosity, and kindness. For “It is not the critic who counts…The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena” (Roosevelt 1910). Thank you farmers for being in the arena of agriculture and leading the way to a resilient food system. ii Dedication To my grandmother, Gladys Louise Rowley iii Abstract Arthropod predators provide crucial pest management services by consuming herbivore prey in agroecosystems. Yet, variation in arthropod predation strength among cropping systems and regions can prevent farmers from taking advantage of this alternative pest management strategy. This research examines underexplored potential causes of variation in arthropod predation in agroecosystems. Arthropod predation increases at lower latitudes. However, it is unknown whether this gradient extends to agroecosystems. Diet breadth of an arthropod predator can influence whether a predator can adequately control resident herbivore populations and can impact predation in a community context by determining whether predatory taxa will compete over shared prey, attack each other as intraguild prey, or partition herbivore taxa into distinct prey niches. To assess the effect of latitude, I first compared predation rates on live and artificial sentinel prey in Brassica agroecosystems between the tropical Federal District, Brazil and temperate Minnesota, United States. Contrary to expectations, I found that predation rates on all bait types were similar between the two localities and that reduced predation rates in the Federal District may be related to higher prey densities. Next, to further explore latitudinal effects, I assessed predation rates in Brassica agroecosystems across 15 degrees of latitude in the United States and 21 degrees of latitude in Brazil. Surprisingly, my results revealed a reverse predation gradient whereby arthropod predation increased with latitude in both countries. To examine the role of diet breadth, I first tested methods to improve molecular gut content analysis of arthropod predators by verifying broad metabarcoding results with species-specific melting curve analysis. This study documented common false positive and false negative taxonomic results and suggested that a species-specific verification step is necessary to ensure accurate depictions of arthropod trophic interactions. Lastly, I use the results of the gut content analysis to characterize the diet breadth of three coccinellid predator species (Coleomegilla maculata, Hippodamia convergens, and Harmonia axyridis) collected from a Brassica agroecosystem in Minnesota. I found that both herbivore and intraguild prey consumption were common among coccinellid species, but that C. maculata was least likely to engage in intraguild predation of fellow coccinellids. iv Table of Contents Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................... i Dedication ....................................................................................................................... iii Abstract ........................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ................................................................................................................ viii Lists of Figures ............................................................................................................. xiii Introduction .................................................................................................................... 1 Latitudinal gradients in biotic interactions ............................................................ 2 Ecological function ................................................................................................ 2 Diet breadth ............................................................................................................ 3 Arthropod predator function in agroecosystems .................................................... 3 Latitudinal gradients in arthropod predation .............................................. 4 Diet breadth and arthropod predation ........................................................ 4 Chapters ................................................................................................................. 5 Chapter 1: Arthropod predation strength is similar between a temperate and tropical Brassica agroecosystem ..................................................................................... 9 Summary ................................................................................................................ 9 Introduction .........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • British Lepidoptera (/)
    British Lepidoptera (/) Home (/) Anatomy (/anatomy.html) FAMILIES 1 (/families-1.html) GELECHIOIDEA (/gelechioidea.html) FAMILIES 3 (/families-3.html) FAMILIES 4 (/families-4.html) NOCTUOIDEA (/noctuoidea.html) BLOG (/blog.html) Glossary (/glossary.html) FAMILY: YPONOMEUTIDAE (8G +1EX 22S +2EX) Suborder:Glossata Infraorder:Heteroneura, Superfamily:Yponomeutoidea MBGBI3 includes families Ypsolophidae, Plutellidae, Argyresthiidae, Praydidae and Scythropiidae as subfmailies (Ypsolophinae, Plutellinae, Argyresthiinae, Praydinae and Scythropiinae) of Yponomeutidae. MBGBI3 also lists Acrolepiinae a subfamily of Yponomeutidae, it is now considered a subfamily of Glyphipterigidae. The remaining Family: Yponomeutidae is equivalent to Subfamily: Yponomeutinae as considered in MBGBI3. Abdominal tergites spined Uncus present, with a pair of prongs Aedeagus usually with a sheath Larvae are mostly web-spinners Yponomeuta (8S) Head smooth or rough-scaled, frons smooth Proboscis developed Antenna ¾ length of forewing; simple at base, weakly serrate beyond basal quarter, minutely ciliate; scape with or without pecten Labial palp moderate, curved, ascending; S2 somewhat rough ventrally; S3 =/> S2 Forewing broad, discal cell long, almost reaching 5/6; white or whitish with longitudinal rows of black spots Hindwing as long as forewing, elongate-ovate; hyaline space between cell and base (/001-yponomeuta-evonymella-bird-cherry-ermine.html) (/002-yponomeuta-padella-orchard-ermine.html) (/003-yponomeuta-malinellus-apple-ermine.html) (/004-yponomeuta-cagnagella-spindle-ermine.html)
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Responses of Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) When Fed Three Species of Forage Grasses Author(S): Heloise A
    Biological Responses of Aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) When Fed Three Species of Forage Grasses Author(s): Heloise A. Parchen and Alexander M. Auad Source: Florida Entomologist, 99(3):456-462. Published By: Florida Entomological Society DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0318 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1653/024.099.0318 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. Biological responses of aphids (Hemiptera: Aphididae) when fed three species of forage grasses Heloise A. Parchen1 and Alexander M. Auad2,* Abstract In Brazil, the forage species Brachiaria spp., Pennisetum purpureum (Schumacher), and Cynodon dactylon (L.) (Poaceae) are important components in the feed that is used to rear animals for meat and milk production. Aphids are among the insects that feed on these forage species and, at high population levels, greatly reduce the amount and quality of forage.
    [Show full text]
  • BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (Takım Düzeyinde)
    BÖCEKLERİN SINIFLANDIRILMASI (TAKIM DÜZEYİNDE) GÖKHAN AYDIN 2016 Editör : Gökhan AYDIN Dizgi : Ziya ÖNCÜ ISBN : 978-605-87432-3-6 Böceklerin Sınıflandırılması isimli eğitim amaçlı hazırlanan bilgisayar programı için lütfen aşağıda verilen linki tıklayarak programı ücretsiz olarak bilgisayarınıza yükleyin. http://atabeymyo.sdu.edu.tr/assets/uploads/sites/76/files/siniflama-05102016.exe Eğitim Amaçlı Bilgisayar Programı ISBN: 978-605-87432-2-9 İçindekiler İçindekiler i Önsöz vi 1. Protura - Coneheads 1 1.1 Özellikleri 1 1.2 Ekonomik Önemi 2 1.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 2 2. Collembola - Springtails 3 2.1 Özellikleri 3 2.2 Ekonomik Önemi 4 2.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 4 3. Thysanura - Silverfish 6 3.1 Özellikleri 6 3.2 Ekonomik Önemi 7 3.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 7 4. Microcoryphia - Bristletails 8 4.1 Özellikleri 8 4.2 Ekonomik Önemi 9 5. Diplura 10 5.1 Özellikleri 10 5.2 Ekonomik Önemi 10 5.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 11 6. Plocoptera – Stoneflies 12 6.1 Özellikleri 12 6.2 Ekonomik Önemi 12 6.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 13 7. Embioptera - webspinners 14 7.1 Özellikleri 15 7.2 Ekonomik Önemi 15 7.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 15 8. Orthoptera–Grasshoppers, Crickets 16 8.1 Özellikleri 16 8.2 Ekonomik Önemi 16 8.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 17 i 9. Phasmida - Walkingsticks 20 9.1 Özellikleri 20 9.2 Ekonomik Önemi 21 9.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 21 10. Dermaptera - Earwigs 23 10.1 Özellikleri 23 10.2 Ekonomik Önemi 24 10.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 24 11. Zoraptera 25 11.1 Özellikleri 25 11.2 Ekonomik Önemi 25 11.3 Bunları Biliyor musunuz? 26 12.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Studies of Louisiana Aphids. Henry Bruce Boudreaux Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses Graduate School 1947 Taxonomic Studies of Louisiana Aphids. Henry Bruce Boudreaux Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses Part of the Life Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Boudreaux, Henry Bruce, "Taxonomic Studies of Louisiana Aphids." (1947). LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses. 7904. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_disstheses/7904 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Historical Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact gradetd@lsu.edu. MANUSCRIPT THESES Unpublished theses submitted for the master*s and doctor*s degrees and deposited in the Louisiana State University Library are available for inspection. Use of any thesis is limited by the rights of the author# Bibliographical references may be noted* but passages may not be copied unless the author has given permission# Credit must be given in subsequent written or published work# A library which borrows this thesis for use by its clientele i3 expected to make sure that the borrower is aware of the above res tr ic t ions # LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY LIBRARY TAXONOMIC STUDIES OF LOUISIANA APHIDS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In The Department of Zoology, Physiology and Entomology by Henry Bruce Boudreaux B»S», Southwestern Louisiana Institute, 1936 M.S*, Louisiana State University, 1939 August, 19h6 UMI Number: DP69282 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted.
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Aphids Attack Native Hawaiian Plants
    Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-006-9045-1 INVASION NOTE Invasive aphids attack native Hawaiian plants Russell H. Messing Æ Michelle N. Tremblay Æ Edward B. Mondor Æ Robert G. Foottit Æ Keith S. Pike Received: 17 July 2006 / Accepted: 25 July 2006 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Invasive species have had devastating plants. To date, aphids have been observed impacts on the fauna and flora of the Hawaiian feeding and reproducing on 64 native Hawaiian Islands. While the negative effects of some inva- plants (16 indigenous species and 48 endemic sive species are obvious, other species are less species) in 32 families. As the majority of these visible, though no less important. Aphids (Ho- plants are endangered, invasive aphids may have moptera: Aphididae) are not native to Hawai’i profound impacts on the island flora. To help but have thoroughly invaded the Island chain, protect unique island ecosystems, we propose that largely as a result of anthropogenic influences. As border vigilance be enhanced to prevent the aphids cause both direct plant feeding damage incursion of new aphids, and that biological con- and transmit numerous pathogenic viruses, it is trol efforts be renewed to mitigate the impact of important to document aphid distributions and existing species. ranges throughout the archipelago. On the basis of an extensive survey of aphid diversity on the Keywords Aphid Æ Aphididae Æ Hawai’i Æ five largest Hawaiian Islands (Hawai’i, Kaua’i, Indigenous plants Æ Invasive species Æ Endemic O’ahu, Maui, and Moloka’i), we provide the first plants Æ Hawaiian Islands Æ Virus evidence that invasive aphids feed not just on agricultural crops, but also on native Hawaiian Introduction R.
    [Show full text]
  • Ploštice (Heteroptera) Chráněné Krajinné Oblasti Kokořínsko True Bugs (Heteroptera) of Kokořínsko Protected Landscape Area
    Bohemia centralis, Praha, 27: 267–294, 2006 Ploštice (Heteroptera) Chráněné krajinné oblasti Kokořínsko True bugs (Heteroptera) of Kokořínsko Protected Landscape Area Josef Bryja1, 2 a Petr Kment 3, 4 1 Oddělení populační biologie, Ústav biologie obratlovců AV ČR, CZ - 675 02 Studenec 122, Česká republika; e-mail: bryja@brno.cas.cz 2 Ústav botaniky a zoologie, Přírodovědecká fakulta MU, Kotlářská 2, CZ - 611 37 Brno, Česká republika 3 Entomologické oddělení, Národní muzeum, Kunratice 1, CZ - 148 00 Praha, Česká republika; e-mail: sigara@post.cz 4 Katedra zoologie, Přírodovědecká fakulta UK, Viničná 7, CZ - 128 44 Praha, Česká republika ▒ Abstract. Faunistic research of true bugs (Heteroptera) in the Kokořínsko Protected Landsape Area (PLA) received only little attention in the past (data on only 22 species were published). Here, we summarize both published and comprehensive recent faunistic data on the true bugs occurring in the PLA. The heteropteran fauna of the PLA Kokořínsko now comprises 305 species (35.6% of species occurring in the Czech Republic) and is characterized by the occurrence of rare species living in well preserved xerothermic or wetland habitats. The observed species richness is slightly higher than that of similarly studied protected areas in the Czech Republic. Twenty one species (6.9% of recorded species richness) is included in the Redlist of the Czech Heteroptera and those species prefer habitats already protected in natural reserves. ▒ Key words: faunistics, Heteroptera, Czech Republic, Bohemia, true bugs, nature conservation 267 BOHEMIA CENTRALIS 27 Úvod a historie výzkumu Přestože více či méně systematický faunistický výzkum ploštic v Čechách započal už v 70.
    [Show full text]
  • Thuja (Arborvitae)
    nysipm.cornell.edu 2019 Search for this title at the NYSIPM Publications collection: ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/41246 Disease and Insect Resistant Ornamental Plants Mary Thurn, Elizabeth Lamb, and Brian Eshenaur New York State Integrated Pest Management Program, Cornell University Thuja Arborvitae Thuja is a genus of evergreens commonly known as arborvitae. Used extensively in ornamental plantings, there are numerous cultivars available for a range of size, form and foliage color. Many can be recognized by their distinctive scale-like foliage and flattened branchlets. Two popular species, T. occidentalis and T. plicata, are native to North America. Insect pests include leafminers, spider mites and bagworms. Leaf and tip blights may affect arbor- vitae in forest, landscape and nursery settings. INSECTS Arborvitae Leafminer, Argyresthia thuiella, is a native insect pest of Thuja spp. While there are several species of leafminers that attack arborvitae in the United States, A. thuiella is the most common. Its range includes New England and eastern Canada, south to the Mid-Atlantic and west to Missouri (5). Arborvitae is the only known host (6). Heavy feeding in fall and early spring causes yellow foliage that later turns brown. Premature leaf drop may follow. Plants can survive heavy defoliation, but their aesthetic appeal is greatly diminished. Re­ searchers at The Morton Arboretum report significant differences in relative susceptibility to feeding by arborvitae leafminer for several Thuja species and cultivars. Arborvitae Leafminer Reference Species Cultivar Least Highly Intermediate Susceptible Susceptible Thuja occidentals 6 Thuja occidentals Aurea 6 Douglasii Aurea 6 Globosa 6 Gracilus 6 Hetz Midget 6 Hetz Wintergreen 6 Arborvitae Leafminer Reference Species Cultivar Least Highly Intermediate Susceptible Susceptible Thuja occidentals Holmstrup 6 Hoopesii 6 Smaragd* 2, 6 Spiralis 6 Techny 6 Umbraculifera 6 Wagneri 6 Wareana 6 Waxen 6 Thuja plicata 6 Thuja plicata Fastigiata 6 *syns.
    [Show full text]
  • Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal BioRisk 4(1): 435–474 (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Chapter 9.2 435 doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.57 RESEARCH ARTICLE BioRisk www.pensoftonline.net/biorisk Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae) Chapter 9.2 Armelle Cœur d’acier1, Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo2, Olivera Petrović-Obradović3 1 INRA, UMR CBGP (INRA / IRD / Cirad / Montpellier SupAgro), Campus International de Baillarguet, CS 30016, F-34988 Montferrier-sur-Lez, France 2 Universidad de León, Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Ambientales, Universidad de León, 24071 – León, Spain 3 University of Belgrade, Faculty of Agriculture, Nemanjina 6, SER-11000, Belgrade, Serbia Corresponding authors: Armelle Cœur d’acier (coeur@supagro.inra.fr), Nicolas Pérez Hidalgo (nperh@unile- on.es), Olivera Petrović-Obradović (petrovic@agrif.bg.ac.rs) Academic editor: David Roy | Received 1 March 2010 | Accepted 24 May 2010 | Published 6 July 2010 Citation: Cœur d’acier A (2010) Aphids (Hemiptera, Aphididae). Chapter 9.2. In: Roques A et al. (Eds) Alien terrestrial arthropods of Europe. BioRisk 4(1): 435–474. doi: 10.3897/biorisk.4.57 Abstract Our study aimed at providing a comprehensive list of Aphididae alien to Europe. A total of 98 species originating from other continents have established so far in Europe, to which we add 4 cosmopolitan spe- cies of uncertain origin (cryptogenic). Th e 102 alien species of Aphididae established in Europe belong to 12 diff erent subfamilies, fi ve of them contributing by more than 5 species to the alien fauna. Most alien aphids originate from temperate regions of the world. Th ere was no signifi cant variation in the geographic origin of the alien aphids over time.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTHROPODA Subphylum Hexapoda Protura, Springtails, Diplura, and Insects
    NINE Phylum ARTHROPODA SUBPHYLUM HEXAPODA Protura, springtails, Diplura, and insects ROD P. MACFARLANE, PETER A. MADDISON, IAN G. ANDREW, JOCELYN A. BERRY, PETER M. JOHNS, ROBERT J. B. HOARE, MARIE-CLAUDE LARIVIÈRE, PENELOPE GREENSLADE, ROSA C. HENDERSON, COURTenaY N. SMITHERS, RicarDO L. PALMA, JOHN B. WARD, ROBERT L. C. PILGRIM, DaVID R. TOWNS, IAN McLELLAN, DAVID A. J. TEULON, TERRY R. HITCHINGS, VICTOR F. EASTOP, NICHOLAS A. MARTIN, MURRAY J. FLETCHER, MARLON A. W. STUFKENS, PAMELA J. DALE, Daniel BURCKHARDT, THOMAS R. BUCKLEY, STEVEN A. TREWICK defining feature of the Hexapoda, as the name suggests, is six legs. Also, the body comprises a head, thorax, and abdomen. The number A of abdominal segments varies, however; there are only six in the Collembola (springtails), 9–12 in the Protura, and 10 in the Diplura, whereas in all other hexapods there are strictly 11. Insects are now regarded as comprising only those hexapods with 11 abdominal segments. Whereas crustaceans are the dominant group of arthropods in the sea, hexapods prevail on land, in numbers and biomass. Altogether, the Hexapoda constitutes the most diverse group of animals – the estimated number of described species worldwide is just over 900,000, with the beetles (order Coleoptera) comprising more than a third of these. Today, the Hexapoda is considered to contain four classes – the Insecta, and the Protura, Collembola, and Diplura. The latter three classes were formerly allied with the insect orders Archaeognatha (jumping bristletails) and Thysanura (silverfish) as the insect subclass Apterygota (‘wingless’). The Apterygota is now regarded as an artificial assemblage (Bitsch & Bitsch 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Universidade Federal De Juiz De Fora Pós-Graduação Em Ciências Biológicas Mestrado Em Comportamento E Biologia Animal
    Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas Mestrado em Comportamento e Biologia Animal Heloise Anne Parchen ADEQUAÇÃO ALIMENTAR DE FORRAGEIRAS PARA AFÍDEOS-PRAGA DE GRAMÍNEAS Juiz de Fora 2015 Heloise Anne Parchen ADEQUAÇÃO ALIMENTAR DE FORRAGEIRAS PARA AFÍDEOS-PRAGA DE GRAMÍNEAS Dissertação apresentada ao Programa de Pós- Graduação em Ciências Biológicas, área de concentração Comportamento e Biologia Animal, da Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, como requisito parcial para obtenção do grau de Mestre. Orientador: Prof. Dr. Alexander Machado Auad Juiz de Fora 2015 AGRADECIMENTOS Agradeço ao meu orientador Dr. Alexander Machado Auad por estar presente todos os dias, por ter tornado esta experiência tão agradável mesmo nos momentos mais difíceis, por ter me incentivado a ir mais longe do que eu imaginava e ter confiado em mim, por ter me dado a oportunidade de estar ao seu lado e conhecer seu trabalho, absorver um pouco do seu vasto conhecimento e por ter sido um amigo e um pai nas horas que eu mais precisei. Agradeço também à sua esposa e filhas por terem me recebido em seu lar nos momentos de confraternização. Agradeço à Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora pela oportunidade e aos professores do Programa de Mestrado em Comportamento e Biologia Animal por todo o conhecimento transmitido, em especial ao Prof. Fábio Prezoto por estar presente durante as avaliações, sempre com muita atenção e sugestões preciosas. Agradeço aos colegas de turma, e também aos funcionários pela dedicação. Agradeço à Embrapa Gado de Leite por ter disponibilizado a infraestrutura necessária para o desenvolvimento do meu trabalho.
    [Show full text]
  • An Overview of Systematics Studies Concerning the Insect Fauna of British Columbia
    J ENTOMOL. Soc. B RIT. COLU MBIA 9 8. DECDmER 200 1 33 An overview of systematics studies concerning the insect fauna of British Columbia ROBERT A. CANNINGS ROYAL BRITISI-I COLUMBIA MUSEUM, 675 BELLEVILLE STREET, VICTORIA, BC, CANADA V8W 9W2 GEOFFREY G.E. SCUDDER DEPARTMENT OF ZOOLOGY, UNIVERSITY OF BRITISI-I COLUMBIA, VANCOUVER, BC, CANADA V6T IZ4 INTRODUCTION This summary of insect systematics pertaining to British Co lumbia is not intended as an hi storical account of entomologists and their work, but rath er is an overview of th e more important studies and publications dealing with the taxonomy, identifi cati on, distribution and faunistics of BC species. Some statistics on th e known size of various taxa are also give n. Many of the systematic references to th e province's insects ca nnot be presented in such a short summary as thi s and , as a res ult, the treatment is hi ghl y se lec tive. It deals large ly with publications appearing after 1950. We examine mainly terrestrial groups. Alth ough Geoff Scudder, Professor of Zoo logy at the University of Briti sh Co lumbi a, at Westwick Lake in the Cariboo, May 1970. Sc udder is a driving force in man y facets of in sect systemat ics in Briti sh Co lum bia and Canada. He is a world authority on th e Hemiptera. Photo: Rob Ca nnin gs. 34 J ENTOMOL. Soc BR IT. COLUMBIA 98, DECEMBER200 1 we mention the aquatic orders (those in which the larv ae live in water but the adults are aerial), they are more fully treated in the companion paper on aquatic in sects in thi s issue (Needham et al.) as are the major aquatic families of otherwise terrestrial orders (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • (Hemiptera: Insecta) in East Anatolia (Turkey) Received: 20-11-2017 Accepted: 21-12-2017
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(1): 1225-1231 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 Additional faunıstıc notes on heteroptera JEZS 2018; 6(1): 1225-1231 © 2018 JEZS (HemIptera: Insecta) in East AnatolIa (Turkey) Received: 20-11-2017 Accepted: 21-12-2017 Barış Çerçi Barış Çerçi, İnanç Özgen and Paride Dioli Köknar 4, Tarçın Street, Koru Neighborhood Ardıçlı Abstract Houses, Esenyurt, İstanbul, The bugs Heteroptera collected in seven provinces of the East Anatolia (Bingöl, Bitlis, Elazığ, Erzincan, Turkey Malatya, Muş and Tunceli) were listed in the present study. It was based on a short but intensive collecting trip made in April-September 2014-2016. Eighty species were reported, many firstly recorded İnanç Özgen Fırat University, Engineering for collecting sites. From these species, 1 species belonging to each of the Ochteridae, Nabidae, Tingidae, Faculty, Bioengineering Artheneidae, Blissidae, Heterogastridae families, 10 species belonging to Miridae family, 7 species Department, Elazığ, Turkey belonging to Reduviidae family, 6 species belonging to Coreidae family, 10 species belonging to Rhopalidae family, 2 species belonging to each of the Alydidae, Berytidae, Geocoridae, Cydinidae and Paride Dioli Scutelleridae families, 17 species belonging to Lygaeidae family, 11 species belonging to Pentatomidae Museo di Storia Naturale Sezione family and 3 species belonging to Pyrrhocoridae family were obtained. The most of these species are new di Entomologia Corso Venezia record for these locations. 55- Milano- Italia Keywords: Hemiptera, heteroptera, fauna, East Anatolia, turkey, new regional record 1. Introduction Heteroptera species of the Eastern Turkey are still little known. The Heteroptera fauna of eastern part of Turkey is still little known compared to the one of the other parts of Anatolia.
    [Show full text]