DOCSLIB.ORG

João Cascalheira Curriculum Vitae

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
João Cascalheira Curriculum Vitae João Cascalheira Curriculum vitae ICArEHB – Interdisciplinary Center for Archaeology and Evolution of Human Behavior FCHS, Universidade do Algarve Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal Tel.: +351 912 468 699 Email: [email protected] Website: joaocascalheira.wordpress.com Education 2013 PhD in Archaeology, University of Algarve, Portugal 2009 MA in Archaeology, University of Algarve, Portugal (final classification: 19 out of 20). 2006 Licenciatura (undergraduate studies) in Cultural Heritage, University of Algarve, Portugal (final classification: 16 out of 20). Current Positions 2014– Post-doctoral fellow, University of Algarve, Portugal. Project The impact of abrupt climate events in the adaptive strategies and the construction of cultural niches during the Late Pleistocene in Iberia. Funded by the Portuguese Science Foundation. Supervisor: Nuno Bicho. 2014– Visitor Assistant Professor, University of Algarve, Portugal. Research Interests Paleolithic and Mesolithic archaeology • Lithic technology • Hunter-gatherer adaptations and technological organization • Human adaptations to climate change • Quantitative and computer applications in Archaeology Participation in projects 2017- Ballistic performance of Upper Paleolithic stone-tipped projectiles: an assessment using computational fluid analysis (PI) (Funded by the Archaeological Institute of America). 2017- Middle and Late Stone Archaeology in Machampane Valley, Limpopo River basin, southern Mozambique. Lithic analysis (Funded by the National Geographic Society. 2016- At the turning of the tide: the last hunter-gatherers and the first farming communities and of Muge (Central Portugal) (Co-PI with Célia Gonçalves, Lino André and Nuno Bicho). (Earthwatch program). 2016- Stone Age Vilankulos: Modern Human Origins Research south of the Rio Save, Mozambique (PI: Jonathan Haws). Field manager and lithic analysis (Funded by the Portuguese Science Foundation). 2016- The Dehesilla cave project (PI: Daniel García Rivero). Field recording methods (Funded by Junta de Andalucia, Spain). 2013-2015 Middle Stone Age archaeology and the origins of modern humans in Southern Mozambique. (PI: Nuno Bicho). Field manager and lithic analysis (Funded by the Portuguese Science Foundation). 2013-2015 GIS predictive modeling for the discovery of new Mesolithic sites in Central Portugal. (PI: Célia Gonçalves). Survey manager and lithic analysis (Funded by the Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation). 2012-2014 The last Neanderthals and the emergence of Modern Humans in Southwestern Iberia. (PI: Nuno Bicho). Field manager and lithic analysis (Funded by the Portuguese Science Foundation and Wenner-Gren Foundation). 2012-2014 The last hunter-gatherers of Muge (Portugal): the origins of social complexity. (PI: Nuno Bicho). Field manager and lithic analysis (Funded by the Portuguese Science Foundation). Grants Fellowships 2017- Archaeological Institute of America - The Ellen and Charles Steinmetz Endowment Fund for Archaeology - Ballistic performance of Upper Paleolithic stone-tipped projectiles: an assessment using computational fluid analysis (5500$) 2014- Portuguese National Science Foundation Post-Doctoral Fellowship (107,280€ - 6 years). 2010-2013 Portuguese National Science Foundation Ph.D. Fellowship (47,040€ - 4 years). 2012 COST Action TD0902 – Submerged Prehistoric Archaeology and Landscapes of the Continental Shelf. Short Term Scientific Mission: The Mediterranean influence in the social networks of the Final Solutrean of Iberia: the cave of Parpalló (1200€). 2010 Paleoanthropology Society – Travel grant to the Paleoanthropology Annual Meeting, May, 2010, St. Louis ($450). 2009 University of Algarve – Merit grant (1350€). 2008-2009 Portuguese National Science Foundation – Investigation grant within the project PTDC/HAH/64185/2006 – UcaRVaT – “The last hunter-gatherers in the Tejo valey – the Muge shellmiddens” (8940€ - 1 year). Publications Citation metrics – January, 2018: 375 citations | Google Scholar H-index 11 BOOKS EDITED VOLUMES Accepted Picin, A. and Cascalheira, J. (Eds.) Short term occupations in Paleolithic archaeology. Interdisciplinary contributions in Archaeology series, Springer. In Press Cascalheira, J. and Bicho, N. (Eds.) Global perspectives on the impact of abrupt climate change in hunter-gatherer-technologies. Special issue in Journal of Quaternary Science. Cascalheira CV, January 12, 2018 - Page 2 of 20 2012 Cascalheira, J. and Gonçalves, C. (Eds.) Proceedings from Conference of Young Researchers in Archaeology (JIA 2011). 2 Volumes. University of Algarve: Faro. 2010 Cascalheira, J. Tecnologia lítica Solutrense do Abrigo de Vale Boi. Cadernos da UNIARQ, 5. UNIARQ: Lisboa. PEER-REVIEWED ARTICLES In press 1. Cascalheira, J. and Bicho, N. - Testing the impact of environmental change on hunter- gatherer settlement organization during the Upper Paleolithic in Western Iberia. Journal of Quaternary Science. In press 2. Bicho, N. and Cascalheira, J. - Global perspectives on the impact of drastic environmental changes in hunter-gatherer technologies. Journal of Quaternary Science. In press 3. Gonçalves, C., Cascalheira, J., Costa, C., Bárbara, S., Matias, R. and Bicho, N. - Detecting single events in large shell mounds: A GIS approach to Cabeço da Amoreira, Muge, Central Portugal. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports. 2017 4. Cascalheira, J., Bicho, N., and Gonçalves, C. – A Google-based freeware solution for Archaeological survey and on-site artifact analysis. Advances in Archaeological Practice 5(4): 328-339. 5. Cascalheira, J., Bicho, N., Manne, T. and Horta, P. - Cross-scale adaptive behaviors during 2017 the Upper Paleolithic in Iberia: The example of Vale Boi (Southwestern Portugal). Quaternary International, 446: 17-30. 2017 6. Bicho, N., Cascalheira, J., and Gonçalves, C. - Early Upper Paleolithic colonization across Europe: time and mode of the Gravettian diffusion. PlosOne 12(5): e0178506. 2017 7. Bicho, N., Cascalheira, J., Gonçalves, C., Umbelino, C., Rivero, D. and André, L. – Resilience, replacement and acculturation in the Mesolithic/Neolithic transition: the case of Muge, central Portugal. Quaternary International, 446: 31-42. 2017 8. Bicho, N., Cascalheira, J., Marreiros, J. and Pereira, P. – Rapid climatic events and long term cultural change: the case of the Portuguese Upper Paleolithic. Quaternary International, 428, Part B: 3-16. 2016 9. Pereira, T., Bicho, N., Cascalheira, J., Infantini, L., Marreiros, J., Paixão, E. and Terradas, X. – Territory and abiotic resources between 33 and 15,6 ka at Vale Boi (SW Portugal). Quaternary International, 412 Part A: 124-134. 2016 10. Bicho, N., Haws, J., Raja, M., Madime, O., Gonçalves, C., Cascalheira, J., Benedetti, M., Pereira, T. and Aldeias, V. – Middle and Late Stone Age of the Niassa region, northern Mozambique. Preliminary results. Quaternary International, 404 Part B: 87-99 2016 11. Gonçalves, C., Raja, M., Madime, O., Cascalheira, J., Matos, D. and Bicho, N. – Mapping Cascalheira CV, January 12, 2018 - Page 3 of 20 the Stone Age of Mozambique. African Archaeological Review 33: 1. 2015 12. Cascalheira, J. and Bicho, N. – On the chronological structure of the Solutrean in Southern Iberia. PLoS ONE 10(9): e0137308. 2014 13. Bicho, N., Marreiros, J., Cascalheira, J., Pereira, T. and Haws, J. – Bayesian modeling and the Chronology of the Portuguese Gravettian. Quaternary International 359-360: 499-509. 2014 14. Marreiros, J., Bicho, N., Gibaja, J., Pereira, T. and Cascalheira, J. – Lithic technology from the Gravettian of Vale Boi: new insights to the Early Upper Paleolithic human behavior in Southern Iberian Peninsula. Quaternary International 359-360: 479-498. 2014 15. Gonçalves, C., Cascalheira, J. and Bicho, N. – Shellmiddens as landmarks: visibility studies in the Mesolithic of the Muge valley (Central Portugal). Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 36: 130-139. 2013 16. Tátá, F., Cascalheira, J., Marreiros, J., Pereira, T. and Bicho, N. – Shell bead production in the Upper Paleolithic of Vale Boi (SW Portugal): an experimental perspective. Journal of Archaeological Science 42: 29-41. 2013 17. Cascalheira, J. and Bicho, N. – Hunter-gatherer ecodynamics and the impact of the Heinrich Event 2 in Central and Southern Portugal. Quaternary International 318: 117-127. 2013 18. Bicho, N., Manne, T., Marreiros, J., Cascalheira, J., Pereira, T., Tátá, F., Évora, M., Gonçalves and Infantini, L. – The ecodynamics of the first modern humans in Southwestern Iberia: the case of Vale Boi, Portugal. Quaternary International 318: 102-116. 2013 19. Bicho, N., Pereira, T., Cascalheira, J., Marreiros, J., Gonçalves, C. and Dias, R. – The chronology of the Mesolithic occupation of the Muge valley, central Portugal: the case of Cabeço da Amoreira. Quaternary International 308-309: 130-139. 2012 20. Cascalheira, J., Bicho, N., Marreiros, J., Pereira, T., Évora, M., Cortés, M., Gibaja, J., Manne, T., Regala, F., Gonçalves, C. and Monteiro, P. – Vale Boi (Algarve, Portugal) and the Solutrean in Southwestern Iberia. Espacio, Tiempo y Forma 5: 455-467. 2012 21. Pereira, T., Cascalheira, J., Marreiros, J., Almeida, F. and Bicho, N. – Variation in quartzite exploitation during the Upper Palaeolithic of Southwest Iberian Peninsula. Trabajos de Prehistoria 69(2): 232-256. 2012 22. Manne, T., Cascalheira, J., Évora, M., Marreiros, J. and Bicho, N. – Intensification during the Upper Paleolithic at Vale Boi, southwestern Portugal. Quaternary International 264: 83- 99. OTHER PUBLICATIONS In press 1. Belmiro, J., Cascalheira, J. and Bicho,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Middle Stone Age of East Africa and the Beginnings of Regional Identity
    Journal of Worm Prehistory, Vol. 2, No. 3. 1988 The Middle Stone Age of East Africa and the Beginnings of Regional Identity J. Desmond Clark ~ The history of research into the Middle Stone Age of East Africa and the present state of knowledge of this time period is examined for the region as a whole, with special reference to paleoenvironments. The known MSA sites and occurrences are discussed region by region and attempts are made to fit them into a more precise chronological framework and to assess their cultural affinities. The conclusion is reached that the Middle Stone Age lasted for some 150,000 years but considerably more systematic and in-depth research is needed into this time period, which is now perceived as of great significance since it appears to span the time of the evolution of anatomically Modern humans in the continent, perhaps in Last Africa. KEY WORDS: Middle Stone Age; Sangoan/Lupemban; long chronology; Archaic Homo sapiens; Modern H. sapiens. • . when we eventually find the skulls of the makers of the African Mousterian they will prove to be of non-Homo sapiens type, although probably not of Neanderthal type, but merely an allied race of Homo rhodesiensis. The partial exception.., of the Stillbay culture group is therefore explicable on the grounds that Homo sapiens influence was already at work. (Leakey, 1931, p. 326) The other view is that the cradle of the Aurignacian races lies hidden somewhere in the Sahara area, probably in the south-east, and that an early wave of movement carried one branch of the stock via Somaliland and the Straits of Bab el-Mandeb into Arabia, and thence to some unknown secondary centre of distribution in Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Later Stone Age Assemblage from Canteen Kopje, Northern Cape
    204 South African Archaeological Bulletin 65 (192): 204–214, 2010 Field and Technical Report A LATER STONE AGE ASSEMBLAGE FROM CANTEEN KOPJE, NORTHERN CAPE TIM R. FORSSMAN1, KATHLEEN KUMAN1,2, GEORGE M. LEADER1,3 & RYAN J. GIBBON1,4 1School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa E-mail: [email protected] / [email protected] [email protected] / [email protected] 2Institute for Human Evolution 3Department of Archaeology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom 4Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA (Received June 2010. Revised November 2010) INTRODUCTION formation in the foraging economy. While such changes Canteen Kopje has been mentioned in archaeological occurred throughout southern Africa (e.g. Dowson 1998; Hall literature for almost a century because of artefacts which & Smith 2000; Sadr 2002), the outcome, according to Kent had come to light during exploitation of the Vaal River gravels (2002), was constrained by site and situational context. Yet, by diamond miners. It was first registered as a diamond mining some general trends are noticed. Most prominently, lithic site in the 1870s under the name Klip Drift (De Wit 2008). In frequencies changed. A general increase in scrapers and corre- 1948, the site was declared a national monument due to the sponding decrease in backed tools occurred across southern richness of its Earlier Stone Age collections (J. Deacon 1993), yet Africa. At the same time, trade items in the form of ceramics, only recently have systematic archaeological excavations been glass beads and iron implements began appearing in the LSA conducted.
    [Show full text]
  • Lukenya Hill, Kenya)
    Late Pleistocene age and archaeological context for the hominin calvaria from GvJm-22 (Lukenya Hill, Kenya) Christian A. Tryona,1, Isabelle Crevecoeurb, J. Tyler Faithc, Ravid Ekshtaina, Joelle Nivensd, David Pattersone, Emma N. Mbuaf, and Fred Spoorg,h aDepartment of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138; bUnité Mixte de Recherche 5199, de la Préhistoire à l’Actuel: Culture, Environnement, et Anthropologie, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université de Bordeaux, 33615 Talence, France; cArchaeology Program, School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia; dDepartment of Anthropology, New York University, New York, NY 10003; eCenter for the Advanced Study of Hominid Paleobiology, Department of Anthropology, The George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052; fNational Museums of Kenya, Nairobi, Kenya 00100; gDepartment of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, D-04103, Leipzig, Germany; and hDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University College London, WC1E 6BT London, United Kingdom Edited by Erik Trinkaus, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, and approved January 16, 2015 (received for review September 19, 2014) Kenya National Museums Lukenya Hill Hominid 1 (KNM-LH 1) is Hominid 1 (KNM-LH 1) partial calvaria from site GvJm-22 at a Homo sapiens partial calvaria from site GvJm-22 at Lukenya Hill, Lukenya Hill, Kenya, the only eastern African fossil hominin Kenya, associated with Later Stone Age (LSA) archaeological de- from a Last Glacial Maximum [LGM; 19–26.4 kya (19)] LSA posits. KNM-LH 1 is securely dated to the Late Pleistocene, and archaeological context. We construct a revised accelerator mass samples a time and region important for understanding the origins spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon chronology built on 26 new of modern human diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Biface Distributions and the Movius Line: a Southeast Asian Perspective
    University of Wollongong Research Online Faculty of Science - Papers (Archive) Faculty of Science, Medicine and Health 2012 Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective Adam Brumm University of Wollongong, [email protected] Mark W. Moore University of New England Follow this and additional works at: https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers Part of the Life Sciences Commons, Physical Sciences and Mathematics Commons, and the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Brumm, Adam and Moore, Mark W.: Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective 2012, 32-46. https://ro.uow.edu.au/scipapers/4441 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact the UOW Library: [email protected] Biface distributions and the Movius Line: A Southeast Asian perspective Abstract The ‘Movius Line’ is the putative technological demarcation line mapping the easternmost geographical distribution of Acheulean bifacial tools. It is traditionally argued by proponents of the Movius Line that ‘true’ Acheulean bifaces, especially handaxes, are only found in abundance in Africa and western Eurasia, whereas in eastern Asia, in front of the ‘line’, these implements are rare or absent altogether. Here we argue, however, that the Movius Line relies on classifying undated surface bifaces as Acheulean on typological grounds alone, a long-standing and widely accepted practice in Africa and western Eurasia, but one that is not seen as legitimate in eastern Asian contexts. A review of the literature shows that bifaces are relatively common as surface finds in Southeast Asia and on this basis we argue that the Movius Line is in need of reassessment.
    [Show full text]
  • Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection
    World Archaeology at the Pitt Rivers Museum: A Characterization edited by Dan Hicks and Alice Stevenson, Archaeopress 2013, pages 35-21 3 Kenyan Stone Age: the Louis Leakey Collection Ceri Shipton Access 3.1 Introduction Louis Seymour Bazett Leakey is considered to be the founding father of palaeoanthropology, and his donation of some 6,747 artefacts from several Kenyan sites to the Pitt Rivers Museum (PRM) make his one of the largest collections in the Museum. Leakey was passionate aboutopen human evolution and Africa, and was able to prove that the deep roots of human ancestry lay in his native east Africa. At Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania he excavated an extraordinary sequence of Pleistocene human evolution, discovering several hominin species and naming the earliest known human culture: the Oldowan. At Olorgesailie, Kenya, he excavated an Acheulean site that is still influential in our understanding of Lower Pleistocene human behaviour. On Rusinga Island in Lake Victoria, Kenya he found the Miocene ape ancestor Proconsul. He obtained funding to establish three of the most influential primatologists in their field, dubbed Leakey’s ‘ape women’; Jane Goodall, Dian Fossey and Birute Galdikas, who pioneered the study of chimpanzee, gorilla and orangutan behaviour respectively. His second wife Mary Leakey, whom he first hired as an artefact illustrator, went on to be a great researcher in her own right, surpassing Louis’ work with her own excavations at Olduvai Gorge. Mary and Louis’ son Richard followed his parents’ career path initially, discovering many of the most important hominin fossils including KNM WT 15000 (the Nariokotome boy, a near complete Homo ergaster skeleton), KNM WT 17000 (the type specimen for Paranthropus aethiopicus), and KNM ER 1470 (the type specimen for Homo rudolfensis with an extremely well preserved Archaeopressendocranium).
    [Show full text]
  • The Relationship Between the Later Stone Age and Iron Age Cultures of Central Tanzania
    THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE LATER STONE AGE AND IRON AGE CULTURES OF CENTRAL TANZANIA Emanuel Thomas Kessy B.A. University of Dar es Salaam, 1991 M.Phi1. Cambridge University, 1992 DISSERTATION SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in the Department of Archaeology O Emanuel Thomas Kessy, 2005 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSlTY Spring 2005 All rights reserved. This work may not be reproduced in whole or in part, by photocopy or other means, without permission of the author. APPROVAL NAME: Emanuel Thomas Kessy DEGREE: TITLE OF THESIS: The Relationship Between the Later Stone Age (LSA) and Iron Age (IA) Cultures of Central Tanzania EXAMINING COMMITTEE: Chair: Dongya Yang Assistant Professor Cathy D'Andre;, Associate Professor Senior Supervisor David Burley, Professor Diane Lyons, Assistant Professor University of Calgary Ross Jamieson, Assistant Professor Internal Examiner Adria LaViolette, Associate Professor University of Virginia External Examiner Date Approved: SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY PARTIAL COPYRIGHT LICENCE The author, whose copyright is declared on the title page of this work, has granted to Simon Fraser University the right to lend this thesis, project nr extended essay to users of the Simon Fraser University Library, acd to make partial or single copies only for such users or in response to a request from the library of any other university, or other educational institution, on its own behalf or for one of its users. The author has further granted permission to Simon Fraser University to keep or make a digital copy for use in its circulating collection. The author has further agreed that permission for multiple copying of this work for scholarly purposes may be granted by either the author or the Dean of Graduate Studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Ornaments of the Earliest Upper Paleolithic: New Insights from the Levant
    Ornaments of the earliest Upper Paleolithic: New insights from the Levant Steven L. Kuhn*†, Mary C. Stiner*, David S. Reese‡, and Erksin Gu¨ lec¸§ *Department of Anthropology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721-0030; ‡Peabody Museum of Natural History, Yale University, P.O. Box 208118, New Haven, CT 06520-8118; and §Paleoantropoloji, Ankara U¨ niversitesi, Dil ve Tarih-Cog˘rafya Faku¨ltesi, Sıhhiye, 06100, Ankara, Turkey Edited by Henry C. Harpending, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, and approved April 10, 2001 (received for review December 13, 2000) Two sites located on the northern Levantine coast, U¨ c¸ag˘ ızlı Cave For some time it has appeared that the earliest Upper (Turkey) and Ksar ’Akil (Lebanon) have yielded numerous marine Paleolithic ornaments came from eastern Africa and central shell beads in association with early Upper Paleolithic stone tools. Europe (8, 9). In the Eastern Mediterranean Basin (the Levant), Accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) radiocarbon dates indicate it seemed until recently that ornaments became widespread only ages between 39,000 and 41,000 radiocarbon years (roughly in the late Upper Paleolithic or early Epipaleolithic, after 20,000 41,000–43,000 calendar years) for the oldest ornament-bearing years ago. Reports of shell beads in earlier sites are sporadic, few levels in U¨ c¸ag˘ ızlı Cave. Based on stratigraphic evidence, the earliest in number, and often troubled by the lack of reliable dates (refs. shell beads from Ksar ’Akil may be even older. These artifacts 10–13, but see ref. 14). This fact was particularly puzzling in the provide some of the earliest evidence for traditions of personal context of recent arguments about modern human origins.
    [Show full text]
  • The Old World Paleolithic and the Development of a National Collection
    /i £\ The Old World Paleolithic and the Development of a National Collection MICHAEL PETRAGLIA and RICHARD POTTS ILLUSTRATIONS BY MARCIA BAKRY SMITHSONIAN CONTRIBUTIONS TO ANTHROPOLOGY • NUMBER 48 SERIES PUBLICATIONS OF THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION Emphasis upon publication as a means of "diffusing knowledge" was expressed by the first Secretary of the Smithsonian. In his formal plan for the Institution, Joseph Henry outlined a program that included the following statement; "It is proposed to publish a series of reports, giving an account of the new discoveries in science, and of the changes made from year to year in all branches of knowledge." This theme of basic research has been adhered to through the years by thousands of titles issued in series publications under the Smithsonian imprint, commencing with Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge in 1848 and continuing with the following active series. Smithsonian Contributions to Anthropology Smithsonian Contributions to Botany Smithsonian Contributions to the Earth Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to the Marine Sciences Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology Smithsonian Contributions to Zoology Smithsonian Folklife Studies Smithsonian Studies in Air and Space Smithsonian Studies in History and Technology In these series, the institution publishes small papers and full-scale monographs that report the research and collections of its various museums and bureaux or of professional colleagues in the world of science and scholarship. The publications are distributed by mailing lists to libraries, universities, and similar institutions throughout the world. Papers or monographs submitted for series publication are received by the Smithsonian Institution Press, subject to its own review for format and style, only through departments of the various Smithsonian museums or bureaux, where the manuscripts are given substantive review.
    [Show full text]
  • Michelle C. Langley Editor
    Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series Michelle C. Langley Editor Osseous Projectile Weaponry Towards an Understanding of Pleistocene Cultural Variability Osseous Projectile Weaponry Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology Series Edited by Eric Delson Vertebrate Paleontology, American Museum of Natural History New York, NY 10024,USA [email protected] Eric J. Sargis Anthropology, Yale University New Haven, CT 06520,USA [email protected] Focal topics for volumes in the series will include systematic paleontology of all vertebrates (from agnathans to humans), phylogeny reconstruction, functional morphology, Paleolithic archaeology, taphonomy, geochronology, historical biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Other fields (e.g., paleoclimatology, paleoecology, ancient DNA, total organismal community structure) may be considered if the volume theme emphasizes paleobiology (or archaeology). Fields such as modeling of physical processes, genetic methodology, nonvertebrates or neontology are out of our scope. Volumes in the series may either be monographic treatments (including unpublished but fully revised dissertations) or edited col- lections, especially those focusing on problem-oriented issues, with multidisciplinary coverage where possible. Editorial Advisory Board Ross D. E. MacPhee (American Museum of Natural History), Peter Makovicky (The Field Museum), Sally McBrearty (University of Connecticut), Jin Meng (American Museum of Natural History), Tom Plummer (Queens College/CUNY). More information about this series at http://www.springer.com/series/6978
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle to Later Stone Age Transition at Panga Ya Saidi, in the Tropical Coastal Forest Of
    1 The Middle to Later Stone Age transition at Panga ya Saidi, in the tropical coastal forest of 2 eastern Africa 3 4 Abstract 5 The Middle to Later Stone Age transition is a critical period of human behavioral change that 6 has been variously argued to pertain to the emergence of modern cognition, substantial 7 population growth, and major dispersals of Homo sapiens within and beyond Africa. 8 However, there is little consensus about when the transition occurred, the geographic 9 patterning of its emergence, or even how it is manifested in stone tool technology that is used 10 to define it. Here we examine a long sequence of lithic technological change at the cave site 11 of Panga ya Saidi, Kenya, that spans the Middle and Later Stone Age and includes human 12 occupations in each of the last five Marine Isotope Stages. In addition to the stone artifact 13 technology, Panga ya Saidi preserves osseous and shell artifacts enabling broader 14 considerations of the covariation between different spheres of material culture. Several 15 environmental proxies contextualize the artifactual record of human behavior at Panga ya 16 Saidi. We compare technological change between the Middle and Later Stone Age to on-site 17 paleoenvironmental manifestations of wider climatic fluctuations in the Late Pleistocene. The 18 principal distinguishing feature of Middle from Later Stone Age technology at Panga ya Saidi 19 is the preference for fine-grained stone, coupled with the creation of small flakes 20 (miniaturization). Our review of the Middle to Later Stone Age transition elsewhere in 21 eastern Africa and across the continent suggests that this broader distinction between the two 22 periods is in fact widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • The Middle Stone Age After 50000 Years
    The Middle Stone Age After 50,000 Years Ago: New Evidence From the Late Pleistocene Sediments of the Eastern Lake Victoria Basin, Western Kenya NICK BLEGEN Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Straße 10, 07745 Jena, GERMANY; and, Department of Anthropology, Har- vard University, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology, 11 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; [email protected]; and, [email protected] J. TYLER FAITH Natural History Museum of Utah & Department of Anthropology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA; [email protected] ALISON MANT-MELVILLE Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; [email protected] DANIEL J. PEPPE Terrestrial Paleoclimatology Research Group, Department of Geosciences, Baylor University, Waco, TX 76706, USA; [email protected] CHRISTIAN A. TRYON Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA; [email protected] submitted: 14 October 2016; revised 19 August 2017; accepted 10 October 2017 ABSTRACT Here we report tephra correlations, lithic artifacts, obsidian sourcing data, and fauna from nine Late Pleistocene localities of the eastern Lake Victoria basin of western Kenya, as well as new excavations from the 49–36 ka site of Nyamita Main on Rusinga Island. The Late Pleistocene of Africa is an important period for the evolution and dispersals of Homo sapiens. A conspicuous behavioral feature of this period is the replacement of Middle Stone Age (MSA) technologies by Later Stone Age (LSA) technologies. Current research shows this process is complex with the LSA appearing and the MSA disappearing at different times in different places across Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Middle Stone Age and Early Late Stone Age Lithic Assemblages at Enkapune Ya Muto (Kenya)
    Middle Stone Age and early Late Stone Age lithic assemblages at Enkapune Ya Muto (Kenya) Alice Leplongeon1,2 1 – McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, University of Cambridge (UK) 2 – Département de Préhistoire, UMR 7194 CNRS, Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Sorbonne Universités, Paris, France Recent research has pushed back in time the shift from the Middle Stone Age (MSA) to the Late Stone Age (LSA) in Africa, such as the site of Mumba rockshelter in Tanzania (~60ka, [1,2]), the site of Border Cave in South Africa (after 56ka, [3]) or the site of Enkapune Ya Muto in Kenya (~50ka, [4]). However, the process of change from the MSA to the LSA remains poorly understood. This paper focuses on the lithic assemblages from Enkapune Ya Muto in order to better understand the nature of changes in lithic technology during the Late Pleistocene at this site and how the early LSA assemblage (Nasampolai industry) distinguishes itself from the other levels. Enkapune Ya Muto, located west of Lake Naivasha in Kenya, has yielded three levels dated to the Late Pleisto- cene: (1) RBL4 stratum with low densities of MSA material (Endingi industry), (2) GG and OL strata with low densities of one of the earliest known LSA (Nasampolai) industries (>50ka) and (3) DBL stratum with high den- sities of an early LSA (Sakutiek) industry (ca 35-40ka) [4]. In the original description of the assemblages, Am- brose [4] notes that the later Sakutiek industry has more “transitional” characteristics (such as low frequencies of parti-bifacial knives, discoidal cores and faceted-platform flakes) than the early LSA Nasampolai industry.
    [Show full text]