DOCSLIB.ORG

S T a T E O F M I C H I G

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
S T a T E O F M I C H I G S T A T E O F M I C H I G A N BEFORE THE MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION * * * * * In the matter, on the Commission’s own motion, ) regarding the regulatory reviews, revisions, ) determinations, and/or approvals necessary for ) INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY ) Case No. U-15808 to fully comply with Public Acts 286 and ) 295 of 2008. ) __________________________________________) At the September 15, 2009 meeting of the Michigan Public Service Commission in Lansing, Michigan. PRESENT: Hon. Orjiakor N. Isiogu, Chairman Hon. Monica Martinez, Commissioner Hon. Steven A. Transeth, Commissioner OPINION AND ORDER On October 6, 2008, Governor Jennifer M. Granholm signed into law Public Acts 286 and 295 of 2008, which amended MCL 460.1 et seq. and created MCL 460.1001 et seq., respectively. On October 21, 2008, the Commission commenced this case to facilitate Indiana Michigan Power Company’s (I&M) obtaining the regulatory reviews, determinations, and approvals necessary for it to fully comply with the new acts. On August 10, 2009, I&M filed an application under MCL 460.1033(3), which requires Commission review and approval of unsolicited renewable energy contracts, for ex parte approval of a renewable energy purchase agreement (REPA) with Fowler Ridge II Wind Farm, LLC (Fowler Ridge). I&M requests that the Commission (1) accept the application for filing; (2) promptly make such investigation and give such notice as it may deem necessary in the circumstances; (3) determine that the approvals requested will not result in an alteration in I&M’s rates or rate schedules that will result in an increase in the cost of service to I&M’s customers, making ex parte approval appropriate; (4) approve the Fowler Ridge power purchase agreement (PPA) for purposes of Section 37 of Act 295 and the related capacity charges for purposes of Subsection 6j(13)(b) of Act 304; (5) find I&M’s decision to enter into the Fowler Ridge PPA reasonable and prudent; (6) find that confidential treatment of certain business information described in the application is appropriate and should be granted to the extent requested; and (7) grant such other and further relief as may be lawful, necessary, and proper. I&M states that the 20-year REPA will result in the provision of 50 nameplate megawatts of wind-powered electric capacity, energy, and renewable energy credits. I&M states in its application that its contract with Fowler Ridge is the result of a competitive request for proposal process. I&M filed a copy of the agreement with certain portions redacted to protect confidential information that might affect the competitive market. However, I&M offered the Commission Staff an opportunity to review an unredacted version of the contract. An electric provider shall submit to the Commission a contract for review and approval. If the Commission approves the contract, it shall be considered to be consistent with the electric provider's renewable energy plan. The Commission shall not approve a contract based on an unsolicited proposal unless the Commission determines that the unsolicited proposal provides opportunities that may not otherwise be available or commercially practical. MCL 460.1033(3). MCL 460.1037 provides in part: If, after the effective date of this act, an electric provider whose rates are regulated by the commission enters a renewable energy contract or a contract to purchase renewable energy credits without the associated renewable energy, the commission shall determine whether the contract provides Page 2 U-15808 reasonable and prudent terms and conditions and complies with the retail rate impact limits under section 45. In making this determination, the commission shall consider the contract price and term. If the contract is a renewable energy contract, the commission shall also consider at least all of the following: (a) The cost to the electric provider and its customers of the impacts of accounting treatment of debt and associated equity requirements imputed by credit rating agencies and lenders attributable to the renewable energy contract. The commission shall use standard rating agency, lender, and accounting practices for electric utilities in determining these costs, unless the impacts for the electric provider are known. (b) Subject to section 45, the life-cycle cost of the renewable energy contract to the electric provider and customers including costs, after expiration of the renewable energy contract, of maintaining the same renewable energy output in megawatt hours, whether by purchases from the marketplace, by extension or renewal of the renewable energy contract, or by the electric provider purchasing the renewable energy system and continuing its operation. (c) Electric provider and customer price and cost risks if the renewable energy systems supporting the renewable energy contract move from contracted pricing to market-based pricing after expiration of the renewable energy contract. As required by Section 37 of Act 295, the Commission has considered each of the factors listed in Section 37(a), (b), and (c), and finds that the Fowler Ridge PPA should be approved. With regard to subsection (a), because the costs associated with this purchase agreement will be recovered under the funding mechanisms provided for in Act 295, it is unlikely that I&M would experience a financial rating change due to this contract. With regard to subsection (b), the 20- year contract term, which the Commission believes is the longest contract term presently offered by developers, provides I&M customers with an adequate source of renewable energy for a reasonable time. With regard to subsection (c), the possibility of this activity will not occur until the end of the 20-year contract term. Because this is an adequate contract length, review of possible replacement costs is unnecessary. Further, the Commission finds that the contract is Page 3 U-15808 reasonable and prudent and provides opportunities that may not otherwise be available or commercially practical. Ex parte review and approval is appropriate, as the REPA will not affect rates or rate schedules resulting in an increase in the cost of service to customers. The Commission finds no prohibition against ex parte approval of a REPA in Act 295. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the renewable energy purchase agreement between Indiana Michigan Power Company and Fowler Ridge II Wind Farm LLC, is approved for the purposes of compliance with 2008 PA 295. Due to its length and availability on the Commission’s website, a copy of the renewable energy purchase agreement is not attached to this order. A person may contact the Commission Staff at (517) 241-6170 or by e-mail at: [email protected] to obtain a print version of the document. The Commission reserves jurisdiction and may issue further orders as necessary. MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION ________________________________________ Orjiakor N. Isiogu, Chairman ________________________________________ By its action of September 15, 2009. Monica Martinez, Commissioner ________________________________ ________________________________________ Mary Jo Kunkle, Executive Secretary Steven A. Transeth, Commissioner Page 4 U-15808 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 1 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 2 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 3 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 4 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 5 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 6 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 7 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 8 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 9 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 10 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 11 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 12 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 13 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 14 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 15 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 16 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 17 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 18 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 19 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 20 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 21 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 22 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 23 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 24 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 25 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 26 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 27 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 28 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 29 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 30 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 31 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 32 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 33 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 34 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 35 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 36 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 37 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 38 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 39 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 40 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 41 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 42 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 43 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 44 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 45 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 46 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 47 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 48 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 49 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 50 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page 51 of 112 Indiana Michigan Power Company Page
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 the Movers and Shakers in Wind
    2016 Top 100 Power People 1 TOP 100 POWER PEOPLE 2016 The movers and shakers in wind Featuring interviews with Samuel Leupold from Dong Energy and Ian Mays from RES Group © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Contents 2 CONTENTS Compiling the Top 100: Advisory panel and ranking process 4 Interview: Dong Energy’s Samuel Leupold discusses offshore 6 Top 100 breakdown: Statistics on this year’s table 11 Profiles: Numbers 100 to 41 13 Interview: A Word About Wind meets RES Group’s Ian Mays 21 Profiles: Numbers 40 to 6 26 Top five profiles:The most influential people in global wind 30 Top 100 list: The full Top 100 Power People for 2016 32 Next year: Key dates for your diary in 2017 34 21 Facing the future: Ian Mays on RES Group’s plans after his retirement © A Word About Wind, 2016 2016 Top 100 Power People Editorial 3 EDITORIAL resident Donald Trump. It is one of The company’s success in driving down the Pthe biggest shocks in US presidential costs of offshore wind over the last year history but, in 2017, Trump is set to be the owes a great debt to Leupold’s background new incumbent in the White House. working for ABB and other big firms. Turn to page 6 now if you want to read the The prospect of operating under a climate- whole interview. change-denying serial wind farm objector will not fill the US wind sector with much And second, we went to meet Ian Mays joy.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary
    Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary Dear Wind Powering America Colleague, We are pleased to present the Wind Powering America FY07 Activities Summary, which reflects the accomplishments of our state Wind Working Groups, our programs at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, and our partner organizations. The national WPA team remains a leading force for moving wind energy forward in the United States. At the beginning of 2007, there were more than 11,500 megawatts (MW) of wind power installed across the United States, with an additional 4,000 MW projected in both 2007 and 2008. The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) estimates that the U.S. installed capacity will exceed 16,000 MW by the end of 2007. When our partnership was launched in 2000, there were 2,500 MW of installed wind capacity in the United States. At that time, only four states had more than 100 MW of installed wind capacity. Seventeen states now have more than 100 MW installed. We anticipate five to six additional states will join the 100-MW club early in 2008, and by the end of the decade, more than 30 states will have passed the 100-MW milestone. WPA celebrates the 100-MW milestones because the first 100 megawatts are always the most difficult and lead to significant experience, recognition of the wind energy’s benefits, and expansion of the vision of a more economically and environmentally secure and sustainable future. WPA continues to work with its national, regional, and state partners to communicate the opportunities and benefits of wind energy to a diverse set of stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Fowler Ridge Wind Farm
    Bat Evaluation Monitoring Studies at the Fowler Ridge Wind Farm Benton County, Indiana Final Report April 1 – October 15, 2019 Prepared for: Fowler Ridge Wind Farm Prepared by: Rhett E. Good, Kristen Nasman and Anna Ciecka Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 408 West 6th Street Bloomington, Indiana 47404 January 17, 2020 Fowler Ridge 2019 Bat Evaluation Monitoring Study Results STUDY PARTICIPANTS Rhett Good Project Manager Anna Ciecka Field Supervisor and Report Compiler Kristen Nasman Statistician Kristen Klaphake GIS Technician Jolie Blevins Project Tracking and Data Manager Linda Koepsell Technical Editor Ashley Matteson Permitted Bat Biologist Beth Rogers Field Technician Sara Grillo Field Technician Ryan Madden Field Technician Hannah Yoquelet Field Technician REPORT REFERENCE Good. R. E., K. Nasman, and A. Ciecka. 2020. Bat Evaluation Monitoring Studies at the Fowler Ridge Wind Farm, Benton County, Indiana: April 1 – October 15, 2019. Prepared for Fowler Ridge Wind Farm, Benton County, Indiana. Prepared by Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST), Bloomington, Indiana. January 17, 2020. WEST, Inc. i January 2020 Fowler Ridge 2019 Bat Evaluation Monitoring Study Results EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Fowler Ridge Wind Farm (FRWF) collectively includes Fowler Ridge Wind Farm LLC, Fowler Ridge II Wind Farm LLC, Fowler Ridge III Wind Farm LLC, and Fowler Ridge IV Wind Farm LLC. The FRWF consists of 420 wind turbines in four phases in Benton County, Indiana. Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. conducted post-construction fatality studies of bats within Phases I, II and III in the fall of 2009 and 2010, when two Indiana bat carcasses were found. The FRWF worked with the US Fish and Wildlife Service and developed a Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP) for the Indiana bat, designed to minimize Indiana bat fatalities.
    [Show full text]
  • Hoopeston Wind, LLC Vermilion County, Illinois
    Hoopeston Wind, LLC Vermilion County, Illinois Final Habitat Conservation Plan for the Indiana Bat and the Northern Long-Eared Bat Hoopeston Wind Project Vermilion County, Illinois September 3, 2017 310 4th Street NE, Suite 200 | Charlottesville, VA 22902 T 434.220.7595 | F 434.220.3712 hoopestonwind.com HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN FOR THE INDIANA BAT AND THE NORTHERN LONG-EARED BAT Introduction October 21, 2016 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction .................................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Applicant Information ...................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Background and Purpose ............................................................................................... 5 1.3 Habitat Conservation Plan Contents ............................................................................... 6 2.0 Background .................................................................................................................. 7 2.1 Overview ........................................................................................................................ 7 2.2 Permit Duration .............................................................................................................. 9 2.3 Regulatory and Legal Framework ................................................................................... 9 2.3.1 Endangered Species Act ...............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Renewable Energy Standard and the Cost-Effectiveness of the Energy Standards
    REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE P.A. 295 RENEWABLE ENERGY STANDARD AND THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ENERGY STANDARDS John D. Quackenbush, Chairman Greg R. White, Commissioner Sally A. Talberg, Commissioner MICHIGAN PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs In compliance with Public Act 295 of 2008 February 13, 2015 Table of Contents Page Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 1 Report Criteria ......................................................................................................................... 1 Renewable Energy Plans and Commission Approval ............................................................. 2 Renewable Energy Cost Reconciliation Cases and Commission Approval ............................ 4 Summary of Renewable Energy Data Collected ........................................................................... 4 Renewable Energy Credit Requirements – 2013 Compliance ................................................. 4 Status of Renewable Energy .......................................................................................................... 8 Michigan Renewable Energy Certification System (MIRECS) .............................................12 Competition in Areas Served by Multiple Providers…………………………………………….14 Cost-Effectiveness of Power Purchase Agreements and Owned Generation ................................16 Impact of the Renewable Energy Standard on Employment
    [Show full text]
  • Vectren Corporation 2014 Integrated Resource Plan
    Vectren Corporation 2014 Integrated Resource Plan Vectren Electric Overview 2 Emissions Control 4 Vectren’s Integrated Resource Plan (IRP) Summary 6 Overview of Public Stakeholder Process 12 Conclusions & Short-term Action Plan 13 Vectren Electric Overview Vectren provides electricity to approximately 142,000 residential, small business and large customers in southwestern Indiana. (Note large customers are primarily industrial but also include universities and hospitals.) Vectren is committed to providing safe, reliable service for customers and maintaining affordable bills. A high proportion of Vectren’s energy sales are made to a relatively small number of small business and large customers. In 2013, about 29% of Vectren’s annual retail electric energy was consumed by residential customers, 23% was consumed by small businesses and 48% was consumed by approximately 100 large customers. Less than 1% was consumed by street lighting. The diagrams below show Vectren’s electric territory (in blue) and the percent of energy used by customer type. Vectren Electric Customer Breakdown Street Lighting <1% DUBOIS PIKE GIBSON Residential 29% SPENCER POSEY WARRICK VANDERBURGH Large SPENCER POSEY 48% WARRICK VANDERBURGH Vectren’s Electric Service Territory Small Business 23% Vectren owns and operates several electric generating facilities in southwestern Indiana. Of Vectren’s total generating capacity 1,158 Megawatts (MW) are credited towards meeting our capacity requirement with the regional transmission operator, Midcontinent Independent System Operator (MISO). Capacity is the amount of power that can be produced at a given time. The table at the top of page 3 shows unforced capacity (UCAP), which takes into consideration system downtime for unforeseen maintenance and unit testing and is, therefore, less than the total capacity of each unit.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 7: References
    Chapter 7 References This page intentionally left blank. Final Environmental Impact Statement Buckeye Wind Project April 2013 7 References Ahlén, I. 2003. Wind turbines and bats: a pilot study. Final Report Dnr 5210P-2002- 00473, Swedish National Energy Commission, Eskilstuna, Sweden. American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). 2008. Wind Energy Siting Handbook, Chapter 5. Washington, D.C. http://www.awea.org/sitinghandbook/download_center.html. Accessed 6 April 2010. American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). 2010. U.S. Wind Energy Projects. http://www.awea.org/projects/. Accessed 6 April 2010. American Wind Energy Association (AWEA). 2012. U.S. Wind Energy Projects. http://www.awea.org/projects/. Accessed June 2012. Arnett, E. B., technical editor. 2005. Relationships between bats and wind turbines in Pennsylvania and West Virginia: an assessment of bat fatality search protocols, patterns of fatality, and behavioral interactions with wind turbines. A final report submitted to the Bats and Wind Energy Cooperative. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas. Arnett, E. B., W. K. Brown, W. P. Erickson, J. K. Fiedler, B. L. Hamilton, T. H. Henry, A. Jain, G. D. Johnson, J. Kerns, R. R. Koford, C. P. Nicholson, T. J. O’Connell, M. D. Piorkowski, and R. D. Takersley, Jr. 2008. Patterns of bat fatalities at wind energy facilities in North America. Journal of Wildlife Management 72:61-78. Arnett, E. B., M. Schirmacher, M. M. P. Huso, and J. P. Hayes. 2009. Effectiveness of changing wind turbine cut-in speed to reduce bat fatalities at wind facilities. Bats and Wind Energy Cooperative. Bat Conservation International. Austin, Texas. Associated Press. 2007. Oregon Wind Tower Collapse Kills Worker.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Bat Activity at the Proposed Resolute Wind Project in Wyoming
    Patterns of pre-construction bat acoustic activity at the proposed Resolute Wind Energy Project, Wyoming, 2009–2010 Final Project Report Cris D. Hein, Michael R. Schirmacher, and Edward B. Arnett Bat Conservation International Manuela M. P. Huso EcoStats, LLC. Final Project Report Prepared for the BATS AND WIND ENERGY COOPERATIVE October 2011 REPORT CITATION Hein, C. D., M. R. Schirmacher, E. B. Arnett, and M. M. P. Huso. 2011. Patterns of pre- construction bat activity at the proposed Resolute Wind Energy Project, Wyoming, 2009–2010. A final project report submitted to the Bats and Wind Energy Cooperative. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, USA. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This study was conducted under the auspices of the Bats and Wind Energy Cooperative (BWEC). We thank the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA), Bat Conservation International (BCI), the National Renewable Energy Laboratory- Department of Energy (NREL), and the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). John Anderson (AWEA), Ed Arnett (BCI), Bob Thresher and Karin Sinclair (NREL), and Christi Johnson-Hughes (USFWS) provided oversight for the BWEC on this project. We thank Clipper Windpower Development (Clipper) for funding this study, and the numerous donors to BCI, member companies of AWEA for additional support. At Clipper, we thank Leif Bang, Casey Willis, Kyle Paulson and David Hazel for logistical support. At Western EcoSystems Technology (WEST), we thank Brenda Orszulak for field assistance and Jeff Gruver for logistical support. We thank Brian Farless and Jennifer Yantachka for assisting with call analysis. We also thank Tom Kunz, Paul Cryan, and Taber Allison of the BWEC Scientific Advisory, and Scott Darling and Michael Herder of the Technical Advisory Committees for their review of this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy Report
    AN EXAMINATION OF THE COMMUNITY LEVEL DYNAMICS RELATED TO THE INTRODUCTION OF WIND ENERGY IN INDIANA Report June 2020 Prepared by Z. Bednarikova, R. Hillberry, N. Nguyen, I. Kumar, T. Inani, M. Gordon, M. Wilcox Purdue Extension – Community Development Purdue University – College of Agriculture Purdue Center for Regional Development 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................. 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 5 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................................................................ 6 PROFILE OF THE WIND ENERGY SECTOR IN INDIANA ................................................................................... 7 I. Indiana’s wind resource ......................................................................................................................... 8 II. The footprint of utility-scale wind energy generation in Indiana ....................................................... 12 III. The wind industry as a source of income .......................................................................................... 15 IV. Payments to local governments ........................................................................................................ 22 V. Policy ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Final Environmental Assessment Wildcat Wind Farm Hcp
    Environmental Assessment for Proposed Habitat Conservation Plan and Incidental Take Permit Wildcat Wind Farm Tipton and Madison Counties, Indiana August 2016 USFWS Bloomington Ecological Services Field Office 620 South Walker Street Bloomington, IN 47403-2121 FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WILDCAT WIND FARM HCP TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1. Project Overview and Background ....................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1 The Wildcat Wind Farm ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1.1.1 Turbines ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1.1.2 Access Roads and Turbine Pads ....................................................................................... 3 1.1.1.3 Collection System and Substation ..................................................................................... 3 1.1.1.4 Transmission Line and Switching Station......................................................................... 3 1.1.1.5 Meteorological Towers ..................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1.6 Operations and Maintenance Building .............................................................................. 4 1.1.2 Plan Area ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California
    Post-Construction Avian and Bat Mortality Monitoring at the Alta X Wind Energy Project Kern County, California Final Report for the Second Year of Operation April 2015 – April 2016 Prepared for Alta Wind X, LLC 14633 Willow Springs Road Mojave, California 93501 Prepared by: Joel Thompson, Carmen Boyd, and John Lombardi Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. 415 West 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, Wyoming 82001 July 22, 2016 Alta X Year 2 Final Report EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Alta Wind X, LLC (Alta Wind X) has constructed a wind energy facility in Kern County, California, referred to as the Alta X Wind Energy Project (“Alta X” or “Project”). Consistent with the Alta East Wind Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR), Alta Wind X is committed to conducting avian and bat mortality monitoring at the Project during the first, second, and third years of operation. Following construction in the spring of 2014, Alta Wind X contracted Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to develop and implement a study protocol for post- construction monitoring at the Project for the purpose of estimating the impacts of the wind energy facility on birds and bats. The following report describes the methods and results of mortality monitoring conducted during the second year of operation of the Project, April 2015 to April 2016. As stated in the DEIR, the goal of the mortality monitoring study is determine the level of incidental injury and mortality to populations of avian or bat species in the vicinity of the Project. To this end, WEST designed and implemented a 3-year study to determine the level of bird and bat mortality attributable to collisions with wind turbines at the facility on an annual basis.
    [Show full text]
  • Etapy Rozwoju Energetyki Wiatrowej W Województwie Kujawsko-Pomorskim
    Moduł E1 Etapy rozwoju energetyki wiatrowej w województwie kujawsko-pomorskim Koordynator modułu - dr Dariusz Brykała Autorzy: Prof. dr hab. Zbigniew Podgórski Mgr Łukasz Sarnowski 1 5.1.1. Etapy rozwoju energetyki wiatrowej na świecie i w Europie Początki wykorzystania przez człowieka energii wiatru są trudne do jednoznacznego określe- nia. Egipcjanie już 2000 lat przed naszą erą wykorzystywali energię wiatru do napędu swoich łodzi. Z Kodeksu Hammurabiego (ok. 1750 r. p.n.e.) wynika, że energia wiatru była wykorzystywana również w Persji. W Indiach w IV w. p.n.e. powstał pierwszy opis zastosowania wiatraka do pompowania wody, a już w II wieku p.n.e w Chinach stosowano wiatraki w kształcie kołowrotów do nawadniania pól uprawnych. Na początku naszej ery wiatraki pojawiły się w krajach basenu Morza Śródziemnego. Rok 644 n.e. uznany został za datę pierwszej udokumentowanej wzmianki o wiatrakach. Pierwsze wiatraki europejskie pojawiły się w Anglii w IX wieku, we Francji w XI wieku, a od wieku XIII upowszechniły się w Europie Zachodniej. Najstarszy obraz wiatraka w Europie znajduje się na inicjale pierwszej strony rękopisu angielskiego z 1270 r. Pierwotnie wiatrak był drewnianą "bud- ką", którą obracano wokół centralnie usytuowanego słupa, tak aby ustawić skrzydła na wiatr. Rewo- lucji w konstrukcji wiatraków dokonali Holendrzy, którzy wprowadzili konstrukcje czteroskrzydłowe. Miało to miejsce w 1390 r. Rozwój wiatraków typu „holendrów” przypadł w Europie na XVII wiek. W roku 1745 angielski konstruktor Edmund Lee wprowadził w budowie wiatraka pomocnicze koło kie- rujące automatycznie wiatrak w stronę wiatru. Największy rozkwit wiatraków miał miejsce w poło- wie XIX wieku. W Europie pracowało wówczas około 200 tysięcy tego typu obiektów (Lerch, 2010).
    [Show full text]