Department of the Interior

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Department of the Interior Vol. 78 Tuesday, No. 209 October 29, 2013 Part III Department of the Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 50 CFR Part 17 Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Determination of Endangered Species Status for 15 Species on Hawaii Island; Final Rule VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:41 Oct 28, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\29OCR3.SGM 29OCR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 64638 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Executive Summary provided additional information, Why we need to publish a rule. This clarifications, and suggestions to Fish and Wildlife Service is a final rule to list 15 species (13 improve this final rule. One shrimp peer plants, 1 insect (picture-wing fly), and 1 reviewer recommended further surveys 50 CFR Part 17 crustacean (anchialine pool shrimp)) for the anchialine pool shrimp, and a [Docket No. FWS–R1–ES–2012–0070; from the island of Hawaii, in the State second shrimp reviewer commented 4500030113] of Hawaii, as endangered species. In that we should proceed with caution addition, in this final rule, we also regarding listing the shrimp due to the RIN 1018–AY09 recognize a taxonomic change for one lack of biological information. A endangered plant species, and revise the response to all peer review comments is Endangered and Threatened Wildlife provided elsewhere in this final rule. and Plants; Determination of List of Endangered and Threatened Endangered Species Status for 15 Plants accordingly. The final critical habitat designation Species on Hawaii Island The basis for our action. Under the for Bidens micrantha ssp. ctenophylla, Act, we determine that a species is an Isodendrion pyrifolium, and AGENCY: Fish and Wildlife Service, endangered or threatened species based Mezoneuron kavaiense, as proposed in Interior. on any of five factors: (A) The present the Federal Register (77 FR 63928; ACTION: Final rule. or threatened destruction, modification, October 17, 2012), is still under or curtailment of its habitat or range; (B) development and undergoing agency SUMMARY: We, the U.S. Fish and overutilization for commercial, review. It will publish in the near future Wildlife Service (Service), determine recreational, scientific, or educational in the Federal Register under Docket endangered species status under the purposes; (C) disease or predation; (D) No. FWS–R1–ES–2013–0028. Endangered Species Act of 1973 (Act), the inadequacy of existing regulatory Previous Federal Actions as amended, for 15 species on the island mechanisms; or (E) other natural or of Hawaii. In addition, we are manmade factors affecting its continued Federal actions for these species prior recognizing a taxonomic change for one existence. We have determined that the to October 17, 2012, are outlined in our Hawaiian plant currently listed as an 15 Hawaii Island species are currently proposed rule (77 FR 63928), which was endangered species and revising the List in danger of extinction throughout all published on that date. Publication of of Endangered and Threatened Plants their ranges as the result of ongoing the proposed rule opened a 60-day accordingly. The effect of this regulation threats that include the destruction and comment period, which closed on is to conserve these species under the modification of habitat from nonnative December 17, 2012. In addition, we Act. feral ungulates (e.g., pigs, goats); published a public notice of the DATES: This rule is effective on competition with nonnative plant and proposed rule on October 20, 2012, in November 29, 2013. animal species; agricultural and urban the local Honolulu Star Advertiser, West development; wildfire, erosion, drought, ADDRESSES: This final rule is available Hawaii Today, and the Hawaii Tribune and hurricanes; climate change; on the Internet at http:// Herald newspapers. On April 30, 2013, predation and herbivory; the www.regulations.gov and http:// we published in the Federal Register a inadequacy of existing regulatory www.fws.gov/pacificislands. Comments document (78 FR 25243) that made mechanisms; human dumping of and materials received, as well as available and requested public nonnative fish and trash; small numbers supporting documentation used in comments on the draft economic of individuals and populations; preparing this final rule, are available analysis for the October 17, 2012, hybridization; the lack of reproduction for public inspection, by appointment, proposed critical habitat designation (77 in the wild; loss of host plants; and during normal business hours, at U.S. FR 63928); announced a public competition with nonnative tipulid flies Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific information meeting and hearing to be (large crane flies). We fully considered Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, 300 held in Kailua-Kona, Hawaii Island, on comments from the public, including Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3–122, May 15, 2013; and reopened the comments we received during a public Honolulu, HI 96850; by telephone at comment period on the October 17, hearing, and comments we received 808–792–9400; or by facsimile at 808– 2012, proposed rule for an additional 30 from peer reviewers, on the proposed 792–9581. days. This second comment period rule. closed on May 30, 2013. In total, we FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Peer reviewers support our methods. accepted public comments on the Loyal Mehrhoff, Field Supervisor, U.S. We obtained opinions from 11 October 17, 2012, proposed rule for 90 Fish and Wildlife Service, Pacific knowledgeable individuals with days. Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, 300 scientific expertise to review our Ala Moana Boulevard, Room 3–122, technical assumptions, to review our Background Honolulu, HI 96850; by telephone at analysis, and to determine whether or Hawaii Island Species Addressed in 808–792–9400; or by facsimile at 808– not we used the best available This Final Rule 792–9581. If you use a information. Nine (2 plant reviewers, 2 telecommunications device for the deaf picture-wing fly reviewers, and 5 of the The table below (Table 1) provides the (TDD), call the Federal Information 7 anchialine pool shrimp reviewers) of scientific name, common name, and Relay Service (FIRS) at 800–877–8339. these 11 peer reviewers generally listing status for the species that are the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: concurred with our methods and subjects of this final rule. VerDate Mar<15>2010 18:41 Oct 28, 2013 Jkt 232001 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4701 Sfmt 4700 E:\FR\FM\29OCR3.SGM 29OCR3 mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with RULES3 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 209 / Tuesday, October 29, 2013 / Rules and Regulations 64639 TABLE 1—THE HAWAII ISLAND SPECIES ADDRESSED IN THIS FINAL RULE [Note that many of the species share the same common name] Scientific name Common name(s) Listing status Plants: Bidens hillebrandiana ssp. hillebrandiana .............................................................. kookoolau ........................... Endangered. Bidens micrantha ssp. ctenophylla ......................................................................... kookoolau ........................... Endangered. Cyanea marksii ....................................................................................................... haha ................................... Endangered. Cyanea tritomantha ................................................................................................ aku ...................................... Endangered. Cyrtandra nanawaleensis ....................................................................................... haiwale ............................... Endangered. Cyrtandra wagneri .................................................................................................. haiwale ............................... Endangered. Mezoneuron kavaiense (taxonomic change accepted) (Formerly listed as uhiuhi .................................. Endangered—Listed in Caesalpinia kavaiense). 1986. Phyllostegia floribunda ........................................................................................... NCN 1 .................................. Endangered. Pittosporum hawaiiense ......................................................................................... hoawa, haawa .................... Endangered. Platydesma remyi ................................................................................................... NCN .................................... Endangered. Pritchardia lanigera ................................................................................................. loulu .................................... Endangered. Schiedea diffusa ssp. macraei ............................................................................... NCN .................................... Endangered. Schiedea hawaiiensis ............................................................................................. NCN .................................... Endangered. Stenogyne cranwelliae ........................................................................................... NCN .................................... Endangered. Animals: Drosophila digressa ................................................................................................ picture-wing fly ................... Endangered. Vetericaris chaceorum ............................................................................................ anchialine pool shrimp ....... Endangered 1 NCN = no common name. Taxonomic Change Since Listing for
Recommended publications
  • Anchialine Cave Biology in the Era of Speleogenomics Jorge L
    International Journal of Speleology 45 (2) 149-170 Tampa, FL (USA) May 2016 Available online at scholarcommons.usf.edu/ijs International Journal of Speleology Off icial Journal of Union Internationale de Spéléologie Life in the Underworld: Anchialine cave biology in the era of speleogenomics Jorge L. Pérez-Moreno1*, Thomas M. Iliffe2, and Heather D. Bracken-Grissom1 1Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Biscayne Bay Campus, North Miami FL 33181, USA 2Department of Marine Biology, Texas A&M University at Galveston, Galveston, TX 77553, USA Abstract: Anchialine caves contain haline bodies of water with underground connections to the ocean and limited exposure to open air. Despite being found on islands and peninsular coastlines around the world, the isolation of anchialine systems has facilitated the evolution of high levels of endemism among their inhabitants. The unique characteristics of anchialine caves and of their predominantly crustacean biodiversity nominate them as particularly interesting study subjects for evolutionary biology. However, there is presently a distinct scarcity of modern molecular methods being employed in the study of anchialine cave ecosystems. The use of current and emerging molecular techniques, e.g., next-generation sequencing (NGS), bestows an exceptional opportunity to answer a variety of long-standing questions pertaining to the realms of speciation, biogeography, population genetics, and evolution, as well as the emergence of extraordinary morphological and physiological adaptations to these unique environments. The integration of NGS methodologies with traditional taxonomic and ecological methods will help elucidate the unique characteristics and evolutionary history of anchialine cave fauna, and thus the significance of their conservation in face of current and future anthropogenic threats.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Inventory of the `Ōla`A Trench at Hawai`I Volcanoes National Park
    PACIFIC COOPERATIVE STUDIES UNIT UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI`I AT MĀNOA Dr. David C. Duffy, Unit Leader Department of Botany 3190 Maile Way, St. John #408 Honolulu, Hawai’i 96822 Technical Report 139 PLANT INVENTORY OF THE `ŌLA`A TRENCH AT HAWAI`I VOLCANOES NATIONAL PARK April 2007 Mashuri Waite1 and Linda Pratt2 1 Pacific Cooperative Studies Unit (University of Hawai`i at Mānoa), NPS Inventory and Monitoring Program, Pacific Island Network, PO Box 52, Hawai`i National Park, HI 96718 2 USGS Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, P.O. Box 44, Hawai`i National Park, HI 96718 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures ......................................................................................................i Abstract ...............................................................................................................1 Introduction.........................................................................................................1 Study Area...........................................................................................................2 Methods ...............................................................................................................3 Vouchers........................................................................................................4 Coordination and Logistics.............................................................................5 Observations and Discussion............................................................................6 Description of Vegetation...............................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Colonizations Lead to Cryptic Biodiversity in an Island Ecosystem: Comparative Phylogeography of Anchialine Shrimp Species in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan
    Reference: Biol. Bull. 225: 24–41. (September 2013) © 2013 Marine Biological Laboratory Multiple Colonizations Lead to Cryptic Biodiversity in an Island Ecosystem: Comparative Phylogeography of Anchialine Shrimp Species in the Ryukyu Archipelago, Japan DAVID A. WEESE1,* YOSHIHISA FUJITA2,3, AND SCOTT R. SANTOS1,4 1Department of Biological Sciences and Molette Biology Laboratory for Environmental and Climate Change Studies, Auburn University, 101 Life Sciences Building, Auburn, Alabama 36849; 2University Education Center, University of the Ryukyus, 1 Senbaru, Nishihara-cho, Okinawa 903-0213, Japan; 3Marine Learning Center, 2-95-101 Miyagi, Chatan-cho, Okinawa 904-0113, Japan; 4Cell and Molecular Biosciences Peak Program, Auburn University, 101 Life Sciences Building, Auburn, Alabama 36849 Abstract. Archipelagos of the Indo-West Pacific are con- results, when interpreted in the context of Pacific oceano- sidered to be among the richest in the world in biodiversity, graphic currents and geologic history of the Ryukyus, imply and phylogeographic studies generally support either the multiple colonizations of the archipelago by the three spe- center of origin or the center of accumulation hypothesis to cies, consistent with the center of accumulation hypothesis. explain this pattern. To differentiate between these compet- While this study contributes toward understanding the bio- ing hypotheses for organisms from the Indo-West Pacific diversity, ecology, and evolution of organisms in the anchialine ecosystem, defined as coastal bodies of mixoha- Ryukyus and the Indo-West Pacific, it also has potential line water fluctuating with the tides but having no direct utility in establishing conservation strategies for anchialine oceanic connections, we investigated the genetic variation, fauna of the Pacific Basin in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations
    Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations Revised Report and Documentation Prepared for: Department of Defense U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Submitted by: January 2004 Species at Risk on Department of Defense Installations: Revised Report and Documentation CONTENTS 1.0 Executive Summary..........................................................................................iii 2.0 Introduction – Project Description................................................................. 1 3.0 Methods ................................................................................................................ 3 3.1 NatureServe Data................................................................................................ 3 3.2 DOD Installations............................................................................................... 5 3.3 Species at Risk .................................................................................................... 6 4.0 Results................................................................................................................... 8 4.1 Nationwide Assessment of Species at Risk on DOD Installations..................... 8 4.2 Assessment of Species at Risk by Military Service.......................................... 13 4.3 Assessment of Species at Risk on Installations ................................................ 15 5.0 Conclusion and Management Recommendations.................................... 22 6.0 Future Directions.............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Landscape-Based Assessment of Climate Change Vulnerability for All Native Hawaiian Plants
    Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDscape-bASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMatE CHANGE VULNEraBILITY FOR ALL NatIVE HAWAIIAN PLANts Lucas Fortini1,2, Jonathan Price3, James Jacobi2, Adam Vorsino4, Jeff Burgett1,4, Kevin Brinck5, Fred Amidon4, Steve Miller4, Sam `Ohukani`ohi`a Gon III6, Gregory Koob7, and Eben Paxton2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaii National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawai‘i at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service —Ecological Services, Division of Climate Change and Strategic Habitat Management, Honolulu, HI 96850 5 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawai‘i National Park, HI 96718 6 The Nature Conservancy, Hawai‘i Chapter, Honolulu, HI 96817 7 USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service, Hawaii/Pacific Islands Area State Office, Honolulu, HI 96850 Hawai‘i Cooperative Studies Unit University of Hawai‘i at Hilo 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720 (808) 933-0706 November 2013 This product was prepared under Cooperative Agreement CAG09AC00070 for the Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center of the U.S. Geological Survey. Technical Report HCSU-044 A LANDSCAPE-BASED ASSESSMENT OF CLIMATE CHANGE VULNERABILITY FOR ALL NATIVE HAWAIIAN PLANTS LUCAS FORTINI1,2, JONATHAN PRICE3, JAMES JACOBI2, ADAM VORSINO4, JEFF BURGETT1,4, KEVIN BRINCK5, FRED AMIDON4, STEVE MILLER4, SAM ʽOHUKANIʽOHIʽA GON III 6, GREGORY KOOB7, AND EBEN PAXTON2 1 Pacific Islands Climate Change Cooperative, Honolulu, HI 96813 2 U.S. Geological Survey, Pacific Island Ecosystems Research Center, Hawaiʽi National Park, HI 96718 3 Department of Geography & Environmental Studies, University of Hawaiʽi at Hilo, Hilo, HI 96720 4 U.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Designs for Hawaiian Archaeology
    Research Designs for Hawaiian Archaeology Research Designs for Hawaiian Archaeology Agriculture, Architecture, Methodology Thomas S. Dye, editor Special Publication 3 Society for Hawaiian Archaeology All rights reserved. Copyright © 2010 by Society for Hawaiian Archaeology. Published in 2010 in the United States of America by Society for Hawaiian Archaeology, P.O. Box 23292, Honolulu, HI 96823. Contents List of Figures vii List of Tables ix 1 Watershed: Testing the Limited Land Hypothesis Robert J. Hommon 1 2 Traditional Hawaiian Surface Architecture: Absolute and Rel- ative Dating Thomas S. Dye 93 3 Lady Mondegreen’s Hopes and Dreams: Three Brief Essays on Inference in Hawaiian Archaeology Dave Tuggle 157 Index 185 v List of Figures 2.1 Map of the Hawaiian Islands . 96 2.2 Oblique schematic of Kaneaki Heiau . 98 2.3 Plan of site 50–10–04–22268 ................... 104 2.4 Interior of the U-shape enclosure at site 50–10–04–22268 . 105 2.5 Panoramic view of site 50–10–04–22268 ............ 106 2.6 Hypothetical stratigraphic section . 110 2.7 Bayesian calibration yields interpretable results . 113 2.8 Deduction and induction . 115 2.9 Plan of site 50–10–04–22119 .................... 121 2.10 Dated enclosure at site 50–10–04–22119 ............ 122 2.11 Plan of site 50–10–04–22201 ................... 124 2.12 Plan of site 50–10–04–22248 ................... 125 2.13 Plan of site 50–50–17–1089 .................... 127 2.14 Plan of site 50–50–17–1088 .................... 128 2.15 Estimated ages of construction events . 132 2.16 Plan of H¯apaiali‘i Heiau .
    [Show full text]
  • Invasive Aphids Attack Native Hawaiian Plants
    Biol Invasions DOI 10.1007/s10530-006-9045-1 INVASION NOTE Invasive aphids attack native Hawaiian plants Russell H. Messing Æ Michelle N. Tremblay Æ Edward B. Mondor Æ Robert G. Foottit Æ Keith S. Pike Received: 17 July 2006 / Accepted: 25 July 2006 Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2006 Abstract Invasive species have had devastating plants. To date, aphids have been observed impacts on the fauna and flora of the Hawaiian feeding and reproducing on 64 native Hawaiian Islands. While the negative effects of some inva- plants (16 indigenous species and 48 endemic sive species are obvious, other species are less species) in 32 families. As the majority of these visible, though no less important. Aphids (Ho- plants are endangered, invasive aphids may have moptera: Aphididae) are not native to Hawai’i profound impacts on the island flora. To help but have thoroughly invaded the Island chain, protect unique island ecosystems, we propose that largely as a result of anthropogenic influences. As border vigilance be enhanced to prevent the aphids cause both direct plant feeding damage incursion of new aphids, and that biological con- and transmit numerous pathogenic viruses, it is trol efforts be renewed to mitigate the impact of important to document aphid distributions and existing species. ranges throughout the archipelago. On the basis of an extensive survey of aphid diversity on the Keywords Aphid Æ Aphididae Æ Hawai’i Æ five largest Hawaiian Islands (Hawai’i, Kaua’i, Indigenous plants Æ Invasive species Æ Endemic O’ahu, Maui, and Moloka’i), we provide the first plants Æ Hawaiian Islands Æ Virus evidence that invasive aphids feed not just on agricultural crops, but also on native Hawaiian Introduction R.
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Responses of the Endemic Shrimp Halocaridina Rubra
    Behavioral Responses of the Endemic Shrimp Halocaridina rubra (Malacostraca: Atyidae) to an Introduced Fish, Gambusia affinis (Actinopterygii: Poeciliidae) and Implications for the Trophic Structure of Hawaiian Anchialine Ponds1 Krista A. Capps,2 Caroline B. Turner,2 Michael T. Booth,2 Danica L. Lombardozzi,2 Scott H. McArt,4 David Chai,3 and Nelson G. Hairston Jr.2,5 Abstract: In the Hawaiian Islands, intentionally introduced exotic fishes have been linked to changes in native biodiversity and community composition. In 1905, the mosquito fish Gambusia affinis was introduced to control mosquitoes. Subsequently, G. affinis spread throughout the Islands and into coastal anchia- line ponds. Previous studies suggest that presence of invasive fishes in anchialine ponds may eliminate native species, including the endemic shrimp Halocaridina rubra. We examined effects of G. affinis on H. rubra populations in anchialine ponds on the Kona-Kohala coast of the island of Hawai‘i. In the presence of G. affinis, H. rubra exhibited a diel activity pattern that was not seen in fishless ponds. Shrimp in ponds with fish were active only at night. This pattern was ev- ident in anchialine ponds and in laboratory experiments. In laboratory predation experiments, G. affinis preferentially consumed smaller H. rubra, and in the field the H. rubra collected from invaded sites were larger than those from fishless ponds. Analysis of trophic position using stable isotope analyses showed that feeding of H. rubra was not significantly distinct from that of snails, assumed to feed at trophic level 2.0 on epilithic algae, but G. affinis was slightly omnivo- rous, feeding at tropic level 2.2.
    [Show full text]
  • A Framework for the Aha Moku System And
    A FRAMEWORK FOR THE AHA MOKU SYSTEM AND COLLABORATIVE GOVERNANCE HISTORY OF THE ‘AHA COUNCILS “There is no man familiar with fishing least he fishes and becomes an expert. There is no man familiar with the soil least he plants and becomes an expert. There is no man familiar with hō`ola least he be trained as a kahuna and becomes expert at it."1 • Following this principle, leaders who govern people manage the resources should be those who are actual practitioners; i.e those who have gained a comprehensive and masterful understanding of the biological, physical, and spiritual aspects of the ʻāina. In traditional Hawaiian resource management, those with relevant knowledge comprised what were called the ‘Aka Kiole,2 the people’s council. o ‘Aha – The kūpuna metaphorically ascribed these councils and the weaving of various ʻike, or knowledge streams, as an ʻaha. The individual aho or threads made from the bark of the olonā shrub were woven together to make strong cordage, called ʻaha. Thus the early Hawaiians referred to their councils as ʻaha to represent the strong leadership created when acknowledged ʻike holders came together to weave their varied expertise for collective decision-making that benefitted the people, land, and natural resources.3 o Kiole – The term kiole described the abundant human population, likened to the ʻiole or large schools of pua (fish fingerlings) that shrouded the coastline en masse. Thus, Molokai’s councils were called ʻAha Kiole, the people’s council.4 • ʻAha council leadership was determined by the people who collectively understood who the experts were in their community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Seed Weight on Photosynthetic Area Development and Weight of the Sainfoin (Onebrychis Spp
    The effect of seed weight on photosynthetic area development and weight of the sainfoin (Onebrychis spp. Scop.) seedling by Stephen Carl Fransen A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Agronomy Montana State University © Copyright by Stephen Carl Fransen (1975) Abstract: The hypothesis that cotyledon area to seed weight ratio might vary among sainfoin accessions was tested by comparing regression coefficients of area on weight. In addition, effects of seed weight upon areas and weights of cotyledons, first and second leaves and total seedlings were studied. Ten accessions of sainfoin representing three different species were studied. After 17 days of growth in a growth chamber, seedlings of all accessions were sampled for the characteristics to be studied. The ratios of cotyledon area to seed weight were similar for most accessions. Seedlings from heavier seeds emerged and developed more rapidly than seedlings from lighter seeds. Embryo axis length and width and leaf primordia length were all highly correlated with seed weight. Areas and weights of cotyledons, first and second leaves were correlated with seed weight for most accessions. Total seedling area and weight, at 17 days of age, were also correlated with initial seed weight. Trifoliolate seedlings had greater first leaf area but less second leaf area than unifoliolate seedlings. As a result, trifoliolate seedlings had only 3.5 percent more total leaf area than unifoliolate seedlings at 17 days. These results help explain some of the variability among previous tests comparing unifoliolate and trifoliolate seedlings for seedling vigor. STATEMENT OF PERMISSION TO COPY Iu presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for an advanced degree at Montana State University, I agree that the Library shall make it freely .available for inspection„ I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes- may be granted by my major professor, or, in his absence, by the Director of Libraries.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 71, No. 89/Tuesday, May 9, 2006/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 89 / Tuesday, May 9, 2006 / Rules and Regulations 26835 I 2. Revise paragraphs (a)(1) and (a)(2) § 1200.7 What are NARA logos and how (1) The Federal Records Center of § 1200.7 to read as follows: are they used? Program; (a) * * * (2) The National Historical Publications and Records Commission; * * * * * This final rule implements the Federal in) of rain per year, while some leeward Dated: May 3, 2006. protections provided by the Act for coasts that lie in the rain shadow of the Allen Weinstein, these 12 species of Hawaiian picture- high volcanoes are classified as deserts, wing flies. receiving as little as 25 cm (10 in) of Archivist of the United States. DATES: This final rule is effective June rain annually. This topographic and [FR Doc. 06–4302 Filed 5–8–06; 8:45 am] 8, 2006. climatic regime has given rise to a rich BILLING CODE 7515–01–P ADDRESSES: Comments and materials diversity of plant communities, received, as well as supporting including coastal, lowland, montane, documentation used in the preparation subalpine, and alpine; dry, mesic, and DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR of this final rule, will be available for wet; and herblands, grasslands, shrublands, forests, and mixed Fish and Wildlife Service public inspection, by appointment, during normal business hours at the communities (Gagne and Cuddihy 1990). These habitats and plant 50 CFR Part 17 Pacific Islands Fish and Wildlife Office, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 300 Ala communities in turn support one of the RIN 1018 AG23 Moana Boulevard, Room 3–122, Box most unique arthropod faunas in the 50088, Honolulu, HI 96850.
    [Show full text]
  • *Wagner Et Al. --Intro
    NUMBER 60, 58 pages 15 September 1999 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS HAWAIIAN VASCULAR PLANTS AT RISK: 1999 WARREN L. WAGNER, MARIE M. BRUEGMANN, DERRAL M. HERBST, AND JOEL Q.C. LAU BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Printed on recycled paper Cover illustration: Lobelia gloria-montis Rock, an endemic lobeliad from Maui. [From Wagner et al., 1990, Manual of flowering plants of Hawai‘i, pl. 57.] A SPECIAL PUBLICATION OF THE RECORDS OF THE HAWAII BIOLOGICAL SURVEY FOR 1998 Research publications of Bishop Museum are issued irregularly in the RESEARCH following active series: • Bishop Museum Occasional Papers. A series of short papers PUBLICATIONS OF describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. Publications containing larger, monographic works are issued in BISHOP MUSEUM four areas: • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology • Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology Numbering by volume of Occasional Papers ceased with volume 31. Each Occasional Paper now has its own individual number starting with Number 32. Each paper is separately paginated. The Museum also publishes Bishop Museum Technical Reports, a series containing information relative to scholarly research and collections activities. Issue is authorized by the Museum’s Scientific Publications Committee, but manuscripts do not necessarily receive peer review and are not intended as formal publications. Institutions and individuals may subscribe to any of the above or pur- chase separate publications from Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135; fax: (808) 841-8968; email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchanging publications should write to: Library Exchange Program, Bishop Museum Library, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-0916, USA; fax: (808) 848-4133; email: [email protected].
    [Show full text]