Suisun Creek Watershed Enhancement Program Summary of Monitoring Results 2002-2010

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Suisun Creek Watershed Enhancement Program Summary of Monitoring Results 2002-2010 SUISUN CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF MONITORING RESULTS 2002-2010 Ca. Land Stewardship Institute Laurel Marcus and Associates Dennis Jackson, Hydrologist Hydrologic Systems Inc. Napa County Resource Conservation Service Alison H. Purcell PhD & Matthew R. Cover PhD Aquatic Ecologists California Sportfishing Protection Alliance SUISUN CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF MONITORING RESULTS 2002‐2010 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Background 1 Monitoring Objectives 3 Water Temperature and Water Quality 4 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) 5 Water Quality and Water Temperature Stations 5 Rainfall 8 When is Water too Warm for Steelhead Trout? 10 Sonde Data 11 Suisun Creek Water Temperature and Water Quality Monitoring, Lake Curry Study 14 Suisun Creek 15 Water Temperature Monitoring 15 Water Quality Monitoring 32 Lake Curry 37 Introduction 37 Background 38 Lake Curry Analysis 38 Conclusions 43 Lake Curry Release Experiment 44 Conditions During the Release Experiement 44 Statistical Analysis 58 Does Increasing the Dam Release Make a Difference? 63 Why Isn’t Increasing the Dam Release More Effective? 66 Summary of Suisun Creek Monitoring Data 68 Suisun Creek Fish Survey 70 Fish Survey 71 Methods 71 Results and Discussion 74 Conclusions 85 Suisun Creek Riparian Canopy 86 Introduction 87 Assessment Using Aerial Imagery 87 Water Temperature Station Canopy Surveys 87 Field Survey 93 Wooden Valley Creek Water Temperatures and Water Quality Monitoring 98 Water Temperature Monitoring 98 Water Quality Monitoring 113 Summary of Wooden Valley Creek Monitoring Data 117 White Creek Water Temperature and Water Quality Monitoring 119 Water Temperature Monitoring 120 Water Quality Monitoring 131 Summary of White Creek Monitoring Data 137 Fine Sediment and Streambed Conditions 142 Monitoring Methods and Quality Assurance/Quality Control QA/QC 143 Topographic Surveys 150 Bed Composition 157 Permeability 163 Benthic Macroinvertebrates 167 Introduction 168 Background 168 Methods 171 Results and Discussion 173 Conclusions 178 Attachment 1 180 Attachment 2 184 References 189 Persons Preparing the Report 195 SUISUN CREEK WATERSHED ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF MONITORING RESULTS 2002-2010 INTRODUCTION The Suisun Creek watershed encompasses 53 square miles in Napa and Solano counties. The watershed has no urban areas. Three major creeks—White Creek, Wooden Valley Creek, and Suisun Creek—drain a watershed of steep, mountainous terrain and several large valleys into the Suisun Marsh and Suisun Bay (Figure 1). Steelhead trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), a federally listed threatened species, have been found in the three main creeks of the watershed. The City of Vallejo owns and operates Lake Curry located on the northern end of Suisun Creek. Land use in the watershed is almost entirely rural: cattle grazing and irrigated agriculture consisting of winegrapes, fruit and nut orchards and row crops. A small amount of urban development occurs along Suisun Creek from Rockville Road to Interstate 80. Major roads in the drainage include Suisun Valley Road, Wooden Valley Road, Gordon Valley Road, Highway 121 and Interstate 80. The main creeks in the drainage are primarily open undeveloped channels lined with native vegetation. Table 1 describes the features of each creek. Table 1: Features of Primary Creeks in the Suisun Creek Watershed Creek Length Watershed Area Additional Features White Creek 4.0 miles 6.6 square miles Leona Lakes at headwaters Wooden Valley Creek 6.8 miles 15.2 square miles Drains alluvial Wooden (including White Creek Valley with 3 channels, watershed) then becomes 1 channel through rock gorge Suisun Creek 14 miles (downstream 53 square miles Lake Curry in northern of Lake Curry) area, creek drains wide alluvial Suisun Valley BACKGROUND In 2001 the California Sportfishing Protection Alliance (CSPA) working with Laurel Marcus & Associates (LMA) received a grant from the Ca. State Coastal Conservancy to prepare a watershed assessment and enhancement plan for the Suisun Creek watershed. Water temperature, water quality, and geomorphic monitoring were carried out for the watershed plan between 2001 and 2003. Extensive mapping of riparian forest and field studies of aquatic habitats was also completed. From this assessment the Enhancement Plan identified a number of actions and projects including: Summary of Monitoring Program 2002-2010 – Suisun Creek Watershed Program 1 Figure 1: Suisun Creek Watershed Summary of Monitoring Program 2002-2010 – Suisun Creek Watershed Program 2 • Restoring riparian forest on denuded channel areas to reduce water temperatures • Eradication of invasive species in the riparian corridor to enhance the corridor and reduce water temperatures o Giant Reed (Arundo donax) mapping, eradication strategy and implementation of removal projects o Native riparian revegetation and invasive plant removal projects • Reducing fine sediment in creeks and improving land management measures using: o Farm Conservation Planning program o Community workshops for rural residential landowners • Evaluation of Lake Curry releases to create cold water habitat in Suisun Creek • Continued monitoring to identify additional needed projects In 2004 CSPA, working with LMA, received a grant from the CALFED Watershed Program for implementation of the recommendations of the watershed plan. This grant included a monitoring task for water quality, water temperature, fine sediment, and channel form and project effectiveness monitoring. The grant also funded: • Arundo removal and revegetation on Suisun Creek; • Removal of other invasive plants on all three creeks; • Revegetation in the riparian corridor on all three creeks; • Implementation of the Fish Friendly Farming (FFF) Environmental Certification Program and implementation of FFF projects; • Workshops for rural residents to reduce pollutants; • Development of re-operation alternatives for Lake Curry. This report summarizes the monitoring completed, QA/QC procedures, conclusions drawn from the monitoring and recommendations for additional monitoring and enhancement actions. MONITORING OBJECTIVES The Suisun Creek Watershed Enhancement Program is focused on the improvement of conditions for steelhead trout. For the anadromous life cycle of the steelhead trout to be fulfilled successfully, the freshwater environment must support all steps in this lifecycle - in-migration and spawning of adults, egg incubation and emergence of young, juvenile rearing over the hot summer months and out- migration by juveniles. The freshwater environment, particularly aquatic and riparian (streamside) habitats are created and sustained by watershed and creek processes. For example, spawning habitat requires deposits of gravel within the creek. Gravel is deposited, moved and sifted by both flood events and changes in the natural form of the creek. The gravel needs to be relatively free of fine silt, often a product of excessive erosion in the watershed. If the creek receives few flood events due to reservoirs, or has been straightened and managed as an urban creek, spawning habitat is compromised. Similarly, if erosion from roads and gullies is too great, spawning may occur, but the eggs can be smothered with silt. Similarly, rearing habitat requires adequate cold water to support the small fish. The shade of dense riparian tree cover, deep pools, and cold groundwater help to keep the water below 68 °F when summer air temperatures exceed 100°F. Groundwater availability is a function of the watershed’s ability Summary of Monitoring Program 2002-2010 – Suisun Creek Watershed Program 3 to infiltrate and store rainfall, the geology of the drainage, the condition of the creek, and the extent and timing of water storage and diversions. The ability of the Suisun Creek watershed to support aquatic life results from natural and man-made watershed conditions and processes, as well as whatever direct management is practiced on the creek, its vegetation and floodplain. WATER TEMPERATURE AND WATER QUALITY Continuous water temperature monitoring was carried out from 2002-2010 except for 2004 and 2008 at a series of stations on White, Wooden Valley, and Suisun Creeks. Figure 2 depicts all of the locations used for water temperature and water quality monitoring. The following questions were the focus of the water temperature and water quality monitoring: • How do summer water temperatures change over the length of Suisun Creek as reservoir releases from Lake Curry are varied between 6 cfs and 2 cfs? • How do summer water temperatures vary over the length of Wooden Valley and White Creeks, particularly in relationship to rainfall levels in various years? • How do summer water temperatures vary in Suisun, Wooden Valley and White Creeks according to levels of canopy closure, upstream thermal inputs, width and depth of flow, and other features? • How do dissolved oxygen levels vary in White and Wooden Valley Creeks in summer months and when creeks become intermittent? • How do dissolved oxygen levels compare between Suisun Creek and Wooden Valley Creek over the same time period? • How does dissolved oxygen vary between the upstream portion of Suisun Creek close to the reservoir outlet and downstream 2-3 miles and downstream 5-6 miles? • What is the pH and specific conductance level in each of the tributaries over the summer months and how do levels change with temperature, water depth, and location in the watershed? Two types of monitoring instruments were used: Hobotemp dataloggers for water temperature and
Recommended publications
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025
    2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 7. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents page page BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.................................................. 7-1 Tables SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................ 7-1 Table 7-1 Potential Wildlife Species of Concern in the RESOURCE CONSERVATION ..................................................... 7-2 Planning Area ........................................................... 7-3 Animal Life.......................................................................... 7-2 Table 7-2 Potential Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Plants Plant Life............................................................................. 7-4 in the Planning Area .................................................. 7-6 Soil Resources ..................................................................... 7-9 Table 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods and Structures ..................... 7-15 Sand and Gravel............................................................... 7-10 Cultural Resources............................................................. 7-11 Figures OPEN SPACE LANDS............................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-1 Generalized Land Cover, 2005 .................................. 7-5 Recreational Open Space................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-2 Aggregate Resources and Reclamation ...................... 7-12 Water Management, Habitat, and Recreation...................... 7-24 Figure 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Status of Coho Salmon in Streams of the Urbanized San Francisco Estuary, California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 91(4):219-254 2005 HISTORICAL STATUS OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE URBANIZED SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA ROBERT A. LEIDY1 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] and GORDON BECKER Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 4179 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94611 [email protected] and BRETT N. HARVEY Graduate Group in Ecology University of California Davis, CA 95616 1Corresponding author ABSTRACT The historical status of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, was assessed in 65 watersheds surrounding the San Francisco Estuary, California. We reviewed published literature, unpublished reports, field notes, and specimens housed at museum and university collections and public agency files. In watersheds for which we found historical information for the occurrence of coho salmon, we developed a matrix of five environmental indicators to assess the probability that a stream supported habitat suitable for coho salmon. We found evidence that at least 4 of 65 Estuary watersheds (6%) historically supported coho salmon. A minimum of an additional 11 watersheds (17%) may also have supported coho salmon, but evidence is inconclusive. Coho salmon were last documented from an Estuary stream in the early-to-mid 1980s. Although broadly distributed, the environmental characteristics of streams known historically to contain coho salmon shared several characteristics. In the Estuary, coho salmon typically were members of three-to-six species assemblages of native fishes, including Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, California roach, Lavinia symmetricus, juvenile Sacramento sucker, Catostomus occidentalis, threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, prickly sculpin, Cottus asper, and/or tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 72 January 1950 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 Prepared by San Francisco District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director WASHINGTON, D. C. Free on application to the Director, Geological Survey, Washington 26, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 EXPLANATION The index lists the stream-flow ana reservoir stations in the Pacific Slope Basins in California for which records have been or are to be pub­ lished for periods prior to September 30, 1948. The stations are listed in downstream order. Tributary streams are indicated by indention. Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Paren­ theses around part of a station name indicate that the enclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. The drainage areas, in square miles, are the latest figures published or otherwise available at this time. Drainage areas that were obviously inconsistent with other drainage areas on the same stream have been omitted. Some drainage areas not published by the Geological Survey are listed with an appropriate footnote stating the published source of the figure of drainage area. Under "period of record" breaks of less than a 12-month period are not shown. A dash not followed immediately by a closing date shows that the station was in operation on September 30, 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • Power Point Presentation
    Friends of the Arroyos A “tributary” of the Alameda Creek Alliance Arroyo Mocho * Arroyo Las Positas * Arroyo Seco * Arroyo del Valle * Arroyo de la Laguna Altamont Creek * Cayateno Creek * Cottonwood Creek * Cottinger Creek * Tassajara Creek * Dry Creek * Mission Creek * Sycamore Creek * Vallecitos Creek MISSION ØRestore the historical steelhead trout migration through the Arroyos via Alameda Creek to the SF Bay ØPromote stream restoration, cleanups, and awareness Steelhead Trout Background Information ØSteelhead are rainbow trout that migrate to the ocean from breeding sites in cool water streams. ØSteelhead (up to 30”) have been caught in the Arroyos here up until the 1960s. ØThey currently do not migrate through the Arroyos because of - barriers in lower Alameda Creek and the Arroyos - inadequate stream flows allowed by Zone 7 Water Agency. ØBiologists have determined that steelhead could spawn in the upper gorge of Arroyo Mocho where native trout already live ØSmolts (juveniles) can survive in existing deep spring-fed pools in the Mocho gorge during our hot summers ØSmolts (1-2 yrs old) migrate downstream and adults upstream to spawn and back during the high flows around storm events. Adults can travel 1 mile/hour! Historical evidence of migration Steelhead caught in Alameda Creek in 1961 Livermore Herald: April 9, 1910 A 30” trout must be a steelhead! How did the steelhead migrate to the Bay? Spawning Habitat in Arroyo Mocho Gorge Map from pg. 24 of “An Assessment of the Potential for Restoring a Viable Steelhead Trout Population in the Alameda Creek Watershed” Prepared for the Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup, Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • Zone 7 Flood Control Department
    Zone 7 Water Agency Flood Protection Program 2013 Annual Report May 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .............................................................................................................................. 1 OVERVIEW ................................................................................................................................................. 2 Introduction and Background ................................................................................................................... 2 Highlighted Accomplishments from 2013 ............................................................................................... 3 ADMINISTRATION .................................................................................................................................... 5 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ........................................................................................ 5 Contract Administration and Management ............................................................................................... 5 Encroachment Permit Program ................................................................................................................. 6 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers PL 84-99 Federal Assistance Program ................................................... 6 Trail-Use Collaboration and Support ....................................................................................................... 6 Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of the Potential for Restoring a Viable Steelhead Trout Population in the Alameda Creek Watershed
    I 580 Si San Francisco Bay Stonybrook Cr. n ba d C r Arroyo Mocho Vallecitos Cr. Canyon San Antonio Reservoir Lake Del Valle I 680 Pirate Cr. I 880 Welch Cr. Alameda Diversion Valpe Cr. Tunnel Calaveras Reservoir Plate 1 - Alameda Creek Watershed Alameda Creek Watershed An Assessment of the Potential for Restoring a Viable Steelhead Trout Population in the Alameda Creek Watershed prepared for the Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup by Andrew J. Gunther Jeffrey Hagar Paul Salop Applied Marine Sciences, Inc. 4749 Bennett Dr., Suite L Livermore, CA 94550 www.amarine.com Hagar Environmental Science 6523 Claremont Ave, Suite B Richmond, CA 94805 February 7, 2000 Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup 2/7/00 Alameda Creek Fisheries Restoration Workgroup 2/7/00 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................ ii Acknowledgements ...................................................................................................iii Executive Summary.................................................................................................... 1 I. Introduction ................................................................................................................ 5 A. Background......................................................................................................... 5 B. Decision Process for preparation of this report .................................................. 7 II. The Alameda Creek Watershed .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix A: Final List of Transportation
    Plan Bay Area Appendix A Final List of Transportation Projects/Programs by County As of May 7, 2012 (Amounts shown in millions of year-of-expenditure dollars) Total Project Committed Discretionary County RTP ID Project/Program Cost Funds Funds BAY AREA REGION/MULTI-COUNTY Bay Area Transportation for Livable Communitites (TLC) Program - Priority Development Area Region/Multi- 21011 (PDA) Planning Grants: provide planning funds to support transit-oriented $ 100 $ - $ 100 County development in PDAs Bay Area Region/Multi- 21012 Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit $ 700 $ 700 $ - County Bay Area Region/Multi- 21013 State-Owned Toll Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement/Retrofit $ 1,620 $ 1,620 $ - County Small transit operators in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Solano and Sonoma Bay Area counties - transit operating and capital improvement program (including replacement, Region/Multi- 21017 $ 9,037 $ 7,534 $ 935 rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and County other capital assets; does not include system expansion) Bay Area Golden Gate Bridge Moveable Median Barrier: installation of a moveable median Region/Multi- 21320 barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge to provide a physical separation between opposing $ 25 $ 25 $ - County directions of traffic Bay Area Implement Transbay Transit Center/Caltrain Downtown Extension (Phase 1 - Transbay Region/Multi- 21342 $ 1,589 $ 1,589 $ - Transit Center) County Bay Area Caltrain Service Frequency Improvements (6-Train Service during Peak Hours), Region/Multi-
    [Show full text]
  • Alameda Countywide Clean Water Program Stormwater Resource Plan
    ALAMEDA COUNTYWIDE CLEAN WATER PROGRAM STORM WATER RESOURCE PLAN MEMBER AGENCIES: Alameda Albany PUBLIC RELEASE Berkeley Dublin DRAFT Emeryville Fremont Hayward Livermore Newark Oakland Piedmont Pleasanton San Leandro Union City County of Alameda Alameda County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Zone 7 Water Agency October 2018 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Purpose of the Plan .................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Alameda County’s Watersheds: Approach and Characterization ................................ 5 1.3 Water Quality Issues And Regulatory Requirements .................................................. 5 1.4 Organization of the SWRP .......................................................................................... 6 2. Coordination and Collaboration ...................................................................................... 7 2.1 Entities Involved in Plan Development ........................................................................ 7 2.2 Coordination of Cooperating Entities and Stakeholders .............................................. 7 2.3 Relationship with Existing Planning Documents .......................................................... 7 2.3.1 San Francisco
    [Show full text]