DOCSLIB.ORG

Appendix A: Final List of Transportation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appendix A: Final List of Transportation Plan Bay Area Appendix A Final List of Transportation Projects/Programs by County As of May 7, 2012 (Amounts shown in millions of year-of-expenditure dollars) Total Project Committed Discretionary County RTP ID Project/Program Cost Funds Funds BAY AREA REGION/MULTI-COUNTY Bay Area Transportation for Livable Communitites (TLC) Program - Priority Development Area Region/Multi- 21011 (PDA) Planning Grants: provide planning funds to support transit-oriented $ 100 $ - $ 100 County development in PDAs Bay Area Region/Multi- 21012 Golden Gate Bridge Seismic Retrofit $ 700 $ 700 $ - County Bay Area Region/Multi- 21013 State-Owned Toll Bridge Rehabilitation/Replacement/Retrofit $ 1,620 $ 1,620 $ - County Small transit operators in Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, Solano and Sonoma Bay Area counties - transit operating and capital improvement program (including replacement, Region/Multi- 21017 $ 9,037 $ 7,534 $ 935 rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and County other capital assets; does not include system expansion) Bay Area Golden Gate Bridge Moveable Median Barrier: installation of a moveable median Region/Multi- 21320 barrier on the Golden Gate Bridge to provide a physical separation between opposing $ 25 $ 25 $ - County directions of traffic Bay Area Implement Transbay Transit Center/Caltrain Downtown Extension (Phase 1 - Transbay Region/Multi- 21342 $ 1,589 $ 1,589 $ - Transit Center) County Bay Area Caltrain Service Frequency Improvements (6-Train Service during Peak Hours), Region/Multi- 21627 Electrification (San Francisco to Tamien), and Communications-Based Overlay Signal 1718 $ 1,046 $ 672 County System (CBOSS) and Positive Train Control System (PTC) Bay Area Implement Sonoma-Marin Area Rail Transit District (SMART) Commuter Rail and Multi- Region/Multi- 22001 $ 360 $ 360 $ - Use Pathway Project (Initial Operating Segment) County Bay Area Improve ferry facilities/equipment including the Downtown Ferry Terminal and Region/Multi- 22006 $ 193 $ 193 $ - procuring additional spare ferry vessels County Bay Area Fund Regional Measure 2 studies (Water Emergency Transportation Authority Region/Multi- 22241 $ 7 $ 7 $ - environmental studies, I-680/Pleasant Hill BART Connector Study) County Bay Area Fund Regional Measure 2 Express Bus North improvements (includes park-and-ride lots Region/Multi- 22243 $ 20 $ 20 $ - and rolling stock) County Bay Area Region/Multi- 22244 Fund City CarShare $ 5 $ 5 $ - County Bay Area Region/Multi- 22245 Fund Safe Routes to Transit $ 30 $ 30 $ - County Bay Area Lifeline Transportation Program: fund programs and services that address Region/Multi- 22423 809 $ - $ 809 transportation gaps specific to low-income communities County Bay Area Planning funds for the Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Association of Bay Region/Multi- 22425 Area Governments, Bay Conservation and Development Commission, and nine county $ 100 $ - $ 100 County congestion management agencies Bay Area Caltrain - transit operating and capital improvement program (including replacement, Region/Multi- 22481 rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and $ 7,667 $ 4,255 $ 1,120 County other capital assets); station improvements (e.g., platforrms) are included Bay Area Region/Multi- 22511 Provide ferry service between Berkeley/Albany and San Francisco $ 312 $ 312 $ - County Bay Area Region/Multi- 22636 Implement BART transbay tube earthquake safety improvements (Phase 1) $ 593 $ 593 $ - County Bay Area Region/Multi- 94089 Implement Presidio Parkway Project $ 2,053 $ 2,053 $ - County Page 1 of 23 Plan Bay Area Appendix A Final List of Transportation Projects/Programs by County As of May 7, 2012 (Amounts shown in millions of year-of-expenditure dollars) Total Project Committed Discretionary County RTP ID Project/Program Cost Funds Funds Bay Area Widen Route 12 (Jameson Canyon) from 2 lanes to 4 lanes from I-80 in Solano County Region/Multi- 94152 $ 140 $ 140 $ - to Route 29 in Napa County (Phase 1) County Bay Area BART - transit operating and capital improvement program (including replacement, Region/Multi- 94525 rehabilitation and minor enhancements, equipment, fixed facilities and other caital $ 43,516 $ 33,513 $ 4,457 County assets) Bay Area AC Transit - transit operating and capital improvement program (including Region/Multi- 94526 replacement, rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, $ 15,926 $ 14,000 $ 172 County fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include system eqpansion) Livermore Amador Valley Transit Authority (LAVTA) - transit operating and capital Bay Area improvement program (including replacement, rehabilitation and minor enhancements Region/Multi- 94527 $ 885 $ 685 $ 161 for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include County system expansion) Central Contra Costa Transit Authority (CCCTA) - transit operating and capital Bay Area improvement program (including replacement, rehabilitation and minor enhancements Region/Multi- 94558 $ 1,444 $ 1,401 $ - for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include County system expansion) Bay Area Golden Gate Transit - transit operating and capital improvement program (including Region/Multi- 94572 replacement, rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, $ 4,240 $ 3,116 $ 681 County fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include system expansion) Valley Transportation Authority (VTA) - transit operating and capital improvement Bay Area program (including replacement, rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling Region/Multi- 94610 $ 20,669 $ 20,669 $ - stock, equipment, fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include system County expansion) San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) - transit operating and capital Bay Area improvement program (including replacement, rehabilitation and minor enhancements Region/Multi- 94636 $ 48,997 $ 42,139 $ 2,190 for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include County system expansion) Bay Area SamTrans - transit operating and capital improvement program (including Region/Multi- 94666 replacement, rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, $ 7,535 $ 6,125 $ 744 County fixed facilities and other capital assets; does not include system expansion) Bay Area SolTrans - transit operating and capital improvement program (including replacement, Region/Multi- 94683 rehabilitation and minor enhancements for rolling stock, equipment, fixed facilities and $ 805 $ 594 $ - County other capital assets; does not include system expansion) Bay Area Implement I-80 Integrated Corridor Mobility (ICM) project operations and Region/Multi- 230221 $ 70 $ 70 $ - management County Bay Area Region/Multi- 230222 Implement San Pablo Avenue SMART Corridors operations and management $ 11 $ 11 $ - County Bay Area Implement Transbay Transit Center/Caltrain Downtown Extension (Phase 2 - Caltrain Region/Multi- 230290 $ 2,596 $ 639 $ 1,957 Downtown Extension) County Bay Area Region/Multi- 230336 Implement recommendations from MTC's Transit Connectivity Plan $ 10 $ 10 $ - County Freeway Performance Initiative (FPI): maximize performance and reliability using Bay Area technology and limited expansions at essential locations on freeways and major Region/Multi- 230419 $ 2,792 $ - $ 2,792 arterials; includes Traffic Operations System (TOS) infrastructure, TOS maintenance County and replacement, arterial coordination and management, and performance monitoring Bay Area Climate Policy Initiatives: fund initiatives that reduce greenhouse has emissions from Region/Multi- 230550 $ 700 $ - $ 700 cars and light duty trucks County Bay Area San Francisco Ferry Berthing Improvements Program (Phase 1): improvements to Region/Multi- 230581 existing ferry terminals and construction of new terminals to accommodate increases $ 33 $ 33 $ - County in ferry ridership Page 2 of 23 Plan Bay Area Appendix A Final List of Transportation Projects/Programs by County As of May 7, 2012 (Amounts shown in millions of year-of-expenditure dollars) Total Project Committed Discretionary County RTP ID Project/Program Cost Funds Funds Bay Area Conduct environmental and design studies related to implementing new ferry services Region/Multi- 230612 $ 2 $ 2 $ - in Antioch and Martinez County Bay Area Implement upgrades to Route 12 (Jameson Canyon) between Napa and Solano Region/Multi- 230627 $ 13 $ 13 $ - Counties (includes grade realignment and full safety barrier) County Bay Area Region/Multi- 230712 Golden Gate Bridge Suicide Barrier - project development $ 8 $ 8 $ - County Bay Area Implement station improvements along the Caltrain corridor associated with planned Region/Multi- 240019 transit-oriented development (includes parking, bus, shuttle and bicycle and pedestrian $ 220 $ 220 $ - County access improvements) Bay Area Implement system-wide access improvements at Caltrain stations associated with Region/Multi- 240031 increased service (includes parking, bus, shuttle and bicycle and pedestrian access $ 30 $ 30 $ - County improvements) Bay Area Caltrain South Terminal Track Capacity Expansion, Phase II and III - project Region/Multi- 240048 $ 16 $ 16 $ - development County Bay Area Region/Multi- 240140 Implement Caltrain at-grade crossing improvements $ 6 $ 6 $ - County Bay Area Priority Conservation Area (PCA) Program: provides funding to preserve open space Region/Multi-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Alameda, a Geographical History, by Imelda Merlin
    Alameda A Geographical History by Imelda Merlin Friends of the Alameda Free Library Alameda Museum Alameda, California 1 Copyright, 1977 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number: 77-73071 Cover picture: Fernside Oaks, Cohen Estate, ca. 1900. 2 FOREWORD My initial purpose in writing this book was to satisfy a partial requirement for a Master’s Degree in Geography from the University of California in Berkeley. But, fortunate is the student who enjoys the subject of his research. This slim volume is essentially the original manuscript, except for minor changes in the interest of greater accuracy, which was approved in 1964 by Drs. James Parsons, Gunther Barth and the late Carl Sauer. That it is being published now, perhaps as a response to a new awareness of and interest in our past, is due to the efforts of the “Friends of the Alameda Free Library” who have made a project of getting my thesis into print. I wish to thank the members of this organization and all others, whose continued interest and perseverance have made this publication possible. Imelda Merlin April, 1977 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer wishes to acknowledge her indebtedness to the many individuals and institutions who gave substantial assistance in assembling much of the material treated in this thesis. Particular thanks are due to Dr. Clarence J. Glacken for suggesting the topic. The writer also greatly appreciates the interest and support rendered by the staff of the Alameda Free Library, especially Mrs. Hendrine Kleinjan, reference librarian, and Mrs. Myrtle Richards, curator of the Alameda Historical Society. The Engineers’ and other departments at the Alameda City Hall supplied valuable maps an information on the historical development of the city.
    [Show full text]
  • San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan
    San Francisco Bay Area Integrated Regional Water Management Plan October 2019 Table of Contents List of Tables ............................................................................................................................... ii List of Figures.............................................................................................................................. ii Chapter 1: Governance ............................................................................... 1-1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................... 1-1 1.2 Governance Team and Structure ...................................................... 1-1 1.2.1 Coordinating Committee ......................................................... 1-2 1.2.2 Stakeholders .......................................................................... 1-3 1.2.2.1 Identification of Stakeholder Types ....................... 1-4 1.2.3 Letter of Mutual Understandings Signatories .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.1 Alameda County Water District ............................. 1-6 1.2.3.2 Association of Bay Area Governments ................. 1-6 1.2.3.3 Bay Area Clean Water Agencies .......................... 1-6 1.2.3.4 Bay Area Water Supply and Conservation Agency ................................................................. 1-8 1.2.3.5 Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District .................................. 1-8 1.2.3.6 Contra Costa Water District .................................. 1-9 1.2.3.7
    [Show full text]
  • Central Coast
    Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ....................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Consultation History......................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Action ............................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Action Area ..................................................................................................................... 32 2. ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: BIOLOGICAL OPINION AND INCIDENTAL TAKE STATEMENT ......................................................................................................... 34 2.1 Analytical Approach ....................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Life History and Range-wide Status of the Species and Critical Habitat ...................... 35 2.3 Environmental Baseline .................................................................................................. 48 2.4 Effects of the Action ........................................................................................................ 62 2.5 Cumulative Effects .......................................................................................................... 76 2.6 Integration and Synthesis ..............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Coast Guard Island Southshore Center
    JACK LONDON SQUARE Oakland Ferry Terminal EMBARCADERO 80 OAKLAN Al DeWitt 2014 Metropolitan O’Club Yacht Club D Bicycle Shop Bike/Walk Path California Gompers Arkansas Enterprise Caution: Noisy, Narrow and Dangerous Bike Locker Bridge with Steps Trail through Posey Tube Alameda Road Stairs Fire Station Bike Path-Caution Mulvaney 9 Pyro Bus Stop Protected Bike Lane Mars Texas Shasta Õ Flint Cimarron Ct Gas Station & Air Bike Lane Narrow Boardwalk WILLIE STARGELL Public Restroom Bike Route 6 EMBARCADERO Public Phone Park Glenview Gate Shopping Center Coast RUBY BRIDGES Guard 80 SCHOOL Island North Star Rd Oakland Yacht Club Eagle Rd Encinal Yacht Club Pickering Dr Campbell Blvd McCulloch Wakefield Dr Icarus Dr Spencer Rd Dr Brush St Dr BASE ro SCHOOL1900 Mun Bear Rd Hudson 1800 1800 1700 ACADEMY OF 1800 Dennison St 1700 ALAMEDA China Clipper EMBARCADERO 100 200 1800 ALAMEDA 400 Alameda Yacht Club 100 500 300 ANIMAL 1700 FortmanThoroughfare Way Cruiser 1600 Hibbard 100 NEACLC SHELTE Red Sails R Bohemia 1500 Alaska Packer 1600 200 200 2000 600 Island Yacht Club 100 1500 900 1000 200 1000 1599 29th Ave 1600 1500 1400 1800 800 23rd Ave 1400 1400 Esterbrook Kennedy Bikers: Take underpass on 29th Avenue ALAMEDA PARK 900 1600 to stay on East 7th Street 1300 Chapman Street East 7th St FRUITVALE Queen’s 1500 1000 1300 1400 BART 1100 1200 1500 Ford St Glascock Street 1300 400 King’s 1300 1400 Derby St 1300 1600 1200 1200 1300 8 900 1700 2000 1300 1100 Stairs East 8th St 1200 1800 1900 1200 Ballena Bay 1900 1200 2400 Yacht Club 1900 Lancaster
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021
    Weekly Projects Bidding 8/13/2021 Reasonable care is given in gathering, compiling and furnishing the information contained herein which is obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but the Planroom is not responsible or liable for errors, omissions or inaccuracies. Plan# Name Bid Date & Time OPR# Location Estimate Project Type Monday, August 16, 2021 OUTREACH MEETING (VIRTUAL) EVERGREEN VALLEY COLLEGE (EVC) STUDENT SERVICES Addenda: 0 COMPLEX (REQUEST FOR SUB BIDS) SC 8/16/21 10:00 AM 21-02526 San Jose School ONLINE Plan Issuer: XL Construction 408-240-6000 408-240-6001 THIS IS A VIRTUAL OUTREACH MEETING. REGISTRATION IS REQUIRED. SEE FLYER FOR DETAILS. The 74,000 sf Student Services Complex at Evergreen Valley College is part of the San Jose Evergreen Community College District's Measure X Bond Program. This is a new ground-up two -story complex including collaboration spaces, offices, storage, restrooms and supporting facilities. All subcontractors must be prequalified with XL Construction to bid the project. Please email [email protected] for a prequalification application link, and [email protected] if you are an Under Utilized Business Enterprise (SBE, WBE, MBE, VBE...). REFINISHING GYM AND STAGE FLOORS AT CALIFORNIA SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND Addenda: 0 8/16/21 12:00 PM 21-02463 Fremont State-Federal Plan Issuer: California Department of Education - Personnel Service Division 916-319-0800 000-000-0000 Contract #: BF210152 The Contractor shall provide all labor, equipment and materials necessary for preparing and refinishing the stage and gym floors, twice a year, at the California School for the Blind (CSB), located at 500 Walnut Avenue, Fremont.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025
    2005 Pleasanton Plan 2025 7. CONSERVATION AND OPEN SPACE ELEMENT Table of Contents page page BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE.................................................. 7-1 Tables SUSTAINABILITY ........................................................................ 7-1 Table 7-1 Potential Wildlife Species of Concern in the RESOURCE CONSERVATION ..................................................... 7-2 Planning Area ........................................................... 7-3 Animal Life.......................................................................... 7-2 Table 7-2 Potential Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Plants Plant Life............................................................................. 7-4 in the Planning Area .................................................. 7-6 Soil Resources ..................................................................... 7-9 Table 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods and Structures ..................... 7-15 Sand and Gravel............................................................... 7-10 Cultural Resources............................................................. 7-11 Figures OPEN SPACE LANDS............................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-1 Generalized Land Cover, 2005 .................................. 7-5 Recreational Open Space................................................... 7-18 Figure 7-2 Aggregate Resources and Reclamation ...................... 7-12 Water Management, Habitat, and Recreation...................... 7-24 Figure 7-3 Historic Neighborhoods
    [Show full text]
  • March 2021 | City of Alameda, California
    March 2021 | City of Alameda, California DRAFT ALAMEDA GENERAL PLAN 2040 CONTENTS 04 MARCH 2021 City of Alameda, California MOBILITY ELEMENT 78 01 05 GENERAL PLAN ORGANIZATION + THEMES 6 HOUSING ELEMENT FROM 2014 02 06 LAND USE + CITY DESIGN ELEMENT 22 PARKS + OPEN SPACE ELEMENT 100 03 07 CONSERVATION + CLIMATE ACTION 54 HEALTH + SAFETY ELEMENT 116 ELEMENT MARCH 2021 DRAFT 1 ALAMEDA GENERAL PLAN 2040 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS CITY OF ALAMEDA PLANNING BOARD: PRESIDENT Alan H. Teague VICE PRESIDENT Asheshh Saheba BOARD MEMBERS Xiomara Cisneros Ronald Curtis Hanson Hom Rona Rothenberg Teresa Ruiz POLICY, PUBLIC PARTICIPATION, AND PLANNING CONSULTANTS: Amie MacPhee, AICP, Cultivate, Consulting Planner Sheffield Hale, Cultivate, Consulting Planner Candice Miller, Cultivate, Lead Graphic Designer PHOTOGRAPHY: Amie MacPhee Maurice Ramirez Alain McLaughlin MARCH 2021 DRAFT 3 ALAMEDA GENERAL PLAN 2040 FORWARD Preparation of the Alameda General Plan 2040 began in 2018 and took shape over a three-year period during which time residents, businesses, community groups, and decision-makers reviewed, revised and refined plan goals, policy statements and priorities, and associated recommended actions. In 2020, the Alameda Planning Board held four public forums to review and discuss the draft General Plan. Over 1,500 individuals provided written comments and suggestions for improvements to the draft Plan through the General Plan update website. General Plan 2040 also benefited from recommendations and suggestions from: ≠ Commission on People with Disabilities ≠ Golden
    [Show full text]
  • Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report
    Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Réseau Électrique CDPQ Infra Inc. Métropolitain (REM) REM Forecasting Report Our reference: 22951103 February 2017 Client reference: BC-A06438 Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Réseau Électrique CDPQ Infra Inc. Métropolitain (REM) REM Forecasting Report Our reference: 22951103 February 2017 Client reference: BC-A06438 Prepared by: Prepared for: Steer Davies Gleave CDPQ Infra Inc. Suite 970 - 355 Burrard Street 1000 Place Jean-Paul-Riopelle Vancouver, BC V6C 2G8 Montréal, QC H2Z 2B3 Canada Canada +1 (604) 629 2610 na.steerdaviesgleave.com Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material for CDPQ Infra Inc.. This material may only be used within the context and scope for which Steer Davies Gleave has prepared it and may not be relied upon in part or whole by any third party or be used for any other purpose. Any person choosing to use any part of this material without the express and written permission of Steer Davies Gleave shall be deemed to confirm their agreement to indemnify Steer Davies Gleave for all loss or damage resulting therefrom. Steer Davies Gleave has prepared this material using professional practices and procedures using information available to it at the time and as such any new information could alter the validity of the results and conclusions made. Réseau Électrique Métropolitain (REM) | REM Forecasting Report Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Directions
    DRIVING DIRECTIONS East Bay / Alameda 707 W Hornet Ave, Pier 3 Alameda Point PO Box 460 Alameda, CA 94501 510-521-8448 www.uss-hornet.org For customized driving directions using Yahoo Maps or 1-800-555-TELL: enter 707 W Hornet Ave, Alameda, CA 94501 From San Francisco and the Bay Bridge: Cross the Bay Bridge towards Oakland and follow the signs for I-880 South/San Jose/Alameda. Take the Broadway/Alameda exit and turn right at the bottom of the ramp onto 5th Street. Continue straight on 5th Street, remaining on street level. At the Broadway intersection, veer to your left to enter the Webster Street Tube (the Alameda entrance to the tunnel is under the freeway). Follow Alameda directions. From San Jose and I-880 Northbound: Proceed toward downtown W. Pacific Ave. Pacific k w Oakland and take the Broadway exit. At the end of the ramp, follow a h y C k e S n tr the signs to Alameda, turning right on Broadway and then immediately al turning right on 7th Street. Go two blocks to Webster Street and turn W. HORNET AVE. right again, entering the Webster Tube (tunnel) to Alameda. (Alternate: Turn left on Broadway and left again to enter Tube under West Alameda freeway overpass.) Follow Alameda directions. From Sacramento and I-80 Westbound: Take I-880 south and take Ralph Appezzato the Broadway/Alameda exit. At the end of the ramp turn right onto Memorial Parkway r t n S Seaplane Lagoon i 5th Street. Stay in the right lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Status of Coho Salmon in Streams of the Urbanized San Francisco Estuary, California
    CALIFORNIA FISH AND GAME California Fish and Game 91(4):219-254 2005 HISTORICAL STATUS OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE URBANIZED SAN FRANCISCO ESTUARY, CALIFORNIA ROBERT A. LEIDY1 U. S. Environmental Protection Agency 75 Hawthorne Street San Francisco, CA 94105 [email protected] and GORDON BECKER Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration 4179 Piedmont Avenue, Suite 325 Oakland, CA 94611 [email protected] and BRETT N. HARVEY Graduate Group in Ecology University of California Davis, CA 95616 1Corresponding author ABSTRACT The historical status of coho salmon, Oncorhynchus kisutch, was assessed in 65 watersheds surrounding the San Francisco Estuary, California. We reviewed published literature, unpublished reports, field notes, and specimens housed at museum and university collections and public agency files. In watersheds for which we found historical information for the occurrence of coho salmon, we developed a matrix of five environmental indicators to assess the probability that a stream supported habitat suitable for coho salmon. We found evidence that at least 4 of 65 Estuary watersheds (6%) historically supported coho salmon. A minimum of an additional 11 watersheds (17%) may also have supported coho salmon, but evidence is inconclusive. Coho salmon were last documented from an Estuary stream in the early-to-mid 1980s. Although broadly distributed, the environmental characteristics of streams known historically to contain coho salmon shared several characteristics. In the Estuary, coho salmon typically were members of three-to-six species assemblages of native fishes, including Pacific lamprey, Lampetra tridentata, steelhead, Oncorhynchus mykiss, California roach, Lavinia symmetricus, juvenile Sacramento sucker, Catostomus occidentalis, threespine stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus, riffle sculpin, Cottus gulosus, prickly sculpin, Cottus asper, and/or tidewater goby, Eucyclogobius newberryi.
    [Show full text]
  • Index of Surface-Water Records
    GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CIRCULAR 72 January 1950 INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 Prepared by San Francisco District UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Oscar L. Chapman, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director WASHINGTON, D. C. Free on application to the Director, Geological Survey, Washington 26, D. C. INDEX OF SURFACE-WATER RECORDS PART 11.PPACIFIC SLOPE BASINS IN CALIFORNIA TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1948 EXPLANATION The index lists the stream-flow ana reservoir stations in the Pacific Slope Basins in California for which records have been or are to be pub­ lished for periods prior to September 30, 1948. The stations are listed in downstream order. Tributary streams are indicated by indention. Station names are given in their most recently published forms. Paren­ theses around part of a station name indicate that the enclosed word or words were used in an earlier published name of the station or in a name under which records were published by some agency other than the Geological Survey. The drainage areas, in square miles, are the latest figures published or otherwise available at this time. Drainage areas that were obviously inconsistent with other drainage areas on the same stream have been omitted. Some drainage areas not published by the Geological Survey are listed with an appropriate footnote stating the published source of the figure of drainage area. Under "period of record" breaks of less than a 12-month period are not shown. A dash not followed immediately by a closing date shows that the station was in operation on September 30, 1948.
    [Show full text]
  • Expenditure Budget 2020-2021
    EXPENDITURE BUDGET 2020 • 2021 VOL. 7 QUÉBEC INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 2020 • 2030 EXPENDITURE BUDGET 2020 • 2021 VOL. 7 QUÉBEC INFRASTRUCTURE PLAN 2020 • 2030 This document does not satisfy the Québec government’s Web accessibility standards. However, an assistance service will nonetheless be available upon request to anyone wishing to consult the contents of the document. Please call 418-643-1529 or submit the request by email ([email protected]). The masculine gender is used throughout this document solely to make the text easier to read and therefore applies to both men and women. 2020-2030 Québec Infrastructure Plan Legal Deposit − March 2020 Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec ISBN: 978-2-550-86171-3 (Print Version) ISBN: 978-2-550-86172-0 (Online) ISSN 2563-1225 (Print Version) ISSN 2563-1233 (Online) © Gouvernement du Québec − 2020 Message from the Minister responsible for Government Administration and Chair of the Conseil du trésor The second version of the Québec Infrastructure Plan (QIP) presented by our Government is the response to the colossal challenges that Québec must face in order to maintain and enhance its infrastructure portfolio. QIP investments have reached a historic high, i.e. $130.5 billion over the next 10 years, up $15.1 billion from the last fiscal year. This means a total increase of over $30.1 billion that our Government is dedicating to the QIP for two years, an unprecedented but essential initiative to keep the infrastructure portfolio in good condition and support its growth based on emerging needs. Four priorities have been put forward in the development of the 2020-2030 QIP: education, with an additional $5.9 billion, mainly to expand and build primary and secondary schools; public transit, with an additional $3.3 billion and several new projects under study; health, which will benefit from an additional $2.9 billion, in part to build seniors' residences; and culture, with the deployment of the cultural itinerary of various cultural infrastructure in different regions of Québec.
    [Show full text]