The Golden Jackal in Slovakia
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
-
On the Margins: Roma and Public Services in Slovakia
On the Margins SLOVAKIA Roma and Public Services in Slovakia A Call to Action to Improve Romani Access to Social Protection, Health Care, and Housing By Ina Zoon Edited by Mark Norman Templeton On the Margins SLOVAKIA Roma and Public Services in Slovakia On the Margins SLOVAKIA Roma and Public Services in Slovakia A Call to Action to Improve Romani Access to Social Protection, Health Care, and Housing By Ina Zoon Edited by Mark Norman Templeton A report to the OPEN SOCIETY INSTITUTE ©2001 by the Open Society Institute. All rights reserved. ISBN 1891385240 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data A CIP catalog record for this book is available upon request. Published by the Open Society Institute 400 West 59th Street, New York, NY 10019 USA On the Margins–Slovakia is the second OSI report on Roma and public services, following On the Margins, which covered Romania, Bulgaria, Macedonia, and the Czech Republic. The Open Society Institute funded the preparation and publication of both reports. OSI is at the center of a worldwide network of founda- tions and programs committed to promoting the development and maintenance of open society by operat- ing and supporting an array of initiatives in educational, social, and legal reform. The report was researched and written by Ina Zoon, a Romanian human rights activist who has worked on Romani issues for much of the past decade. She currently lives in Madrid and works as a consultant to OSI and others. She is a member of the board of directors of the European Roma Rights Center. -
The Nature of Teller Coyotes Physical Description Coyotes (Canis Latrans
The Nature of Teller Coyotes Physical Description Coyotes (Canis latrans) are members of the canine family. Of the 19 subspecies, the mountain coyote is the one you’ll encounter in Teller County. They have gray, white, tan, and brown fur. The coyote in the photograph was taken from Edlowe Road. They are about the size of a medium-size dog, weighing 20 to 50 pounds. Their long, bushy tails are helpful species identifiers. Coyotes run with their tails down while domestic dogs run with tails up and wolves run with tails straight out. Life History In many areas, coyotes are solitary outside of the breeding season; but their social organization is influenced by prey size. In populations where the majority of prey are small rodents, coyotes tend to be solitary. In populations where larger animals are available (elk and deer), large groups of coyotes (packs) may form. Like other canines, coyotes do not hibernate. A male and female will pair off and remain together for several years, although they may not be life mates. Mating occurs between January and March. They establish dens abandoned by other animals, or dig one themselves. Litters of 5-7are born sightless and hairless two months after mating. Their eyes open after 10 days, and they leave the den between 8-10 weeks of age. Movement of pups from one den to another is common. The reason is unknown, but disturbance and infestation by parasites may be factors. Coyotes in captivity may live as long as 18 years, but in wild populations few coyotes live more than 6 to 8 years. -
Glimpse of an African… Wolf? Cécile Bloch
$6.95 Glimpse of an African… Wolf ? PAGE 4 Saving the Red Wolf Through Partnerships PAGE 9 Are Gray Wolves Still Endangered? PAGE 14 Make Your Home Howl Members Save 10% Order today at shop.wolf.org or call 1-800-ELY-WOLF Your purchases help support the mission of the International Wolf Center. VOLUME 25, NO. 1 THE QUARTERLY PUBLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL WOLF CENTER SPRING 2015 4 Cécile Bloch 9 Jeremy Hooper 14 Don Gossett In the Long Shadow of The Red Wolf Species Survival Are Gray Wolves Still the Pyramids and Beyond: Plan: Saving the Red Wolf Endangered? Glimpse of an African…Wolf? Through Partnerships In December a federal judge ruled Geneticists have found that some In 1967 the number of red wolves that protections be reinstated for of Africa’s golden jackals are was rapidly declining, forcing those gray wolves in the Great Lakes members of the gray wolf lineage. remaining to breed with the more wolf population area, reversing Biologists are now asking: how abundant coyote or not to breed at all. the USFWS’s 2011 delisting many golden jackals across Africa The rate of hybridization between the decision that allowed states to are a subspecies known as the two species left little time to prevent manage wolves and implement African wolf? Are Africa’s golden red wolf genes from being completely harvest programs for recreational jackals, in fact, wolves? absorbed into the expanding coyote purposes. If biological security is population. The Red Wolf Recovery by Cheryl Lyn Dybas apparently not enough rationale for Program, working with many other conservation of the species, then the organizations, has created awareness challenge arises to properly express and laid a foundation for the future to the ecological value of the species. -
Ecology of the European Badger (Meles Meles) in the Western Carpathian Mountains: a Review
Wildl. Biol. Pract., 2016 Aug 12(3): 36-50 doi:10.2461/wbp.2016.eb.4 REVIEW Ecology of the European Badger (Meles meles) in the Western Carpathian Mountains: A Review R.W. Mysłajek1,*, S. Nowak2, A. Rożen3, K. Kurek2, M. Figura2 & B. Jędrzejewska4 1 Institute of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Pawińskiego 5a, 02-106 Warszawa, Poland. 2 Association for Nature “Wolf”, Twardorzeczka 229, 34-324 Lipowa, Poland. 3 Institute of Environmental Sciences, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 7, 30-387 Kraków, Poland. 4 Mammal Research Institute, Polish Academy of Sciences, Waszkiewicza 1c, 17-230 Białowieża, Poland. * Corresponding author email: [email protected]. Keywords Abstract Altitudinal Gradient; This article summarizes the results of studies on the ecology of the European Diet Composition; badger (Meles meles) conducted in the Western Carpathians (S Poland) Meles meles; from 2002 to 2010. Badgers inhabiting the Carpathians use excavated setts Mustelidae; (53%), caves and rock crevices (43%), and burrows under human-made Sett Utilization; constructions (4%) as permanent shelters. Excavated setts are located up Spatial Organization. to 640 m a.s.l., but shelters in caves and crevices can be found as high as 1,050 m a.s.l. Badger setts are mostly located on slopes with southern, eastern or western exposure. Within their territories, ranging from 3.35 to 8.45 km2 (MCP100%), badgers may possess 1-12 setts. Family groups are small (mean = 2.3 badgers), population density is low (2.2 badgers/10 km2), as is reproduction (0.57 young/year/10 km2). Hunting by humans is the main mortality factor (0.37 badger/year/10 km2). -
Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes Vulpes Necator): a Conservation Assessment
Sierra Nevada Red Fox (Vulpes vulpes necator): A Conservation Assessment John D. Perrine * Environmental Science, Policy and Management Department and Museum of Vertebrate Zoology University of California, Berkeley Lori A. Campbell** USDA Forest Service Pacific Southwest Research Station Sierra Nevada Research Center Davis, California Gregory A. Green Tetra Tech EC Bothell, Washington Current address and contact information: *Primary Author: J. Perrine, Biological Sciences Department, California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, CA 93407-0401 [email protected] **L. Campbell, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, CA 95616 Perrine, Campbell and Green R5-FR-010 August 2010 NOTES IN PROOF • Genetic analyses by B. Sacks and others 2010 (Conservation Genetics 11:1523-1539) indicate that the Sacramento Valley red fox population is native to California and is closely related to the Sierra Nevada red fox. They designated the Sacramento Valley red fox as a new subspecies, V. v. patwin. • In August 2010, as this document was going to press, biologists on the Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest detected a red fox at an automatic camera station near the Sonora Pass along the border of Tuolomne and Mono Counties. Preliminary genetic analyses conducted at UC Davis indicate that the fox was a Sierra Nevada red fox. Further surveys and analyses are planned. • The California Department of Fish and Game Region 1 Timber Harvest Program has established a Sierra Nevada red fox information portal, where many management-relevant documents can be downloaded as PDFs. See: https://r1.dfg.ca.gov/Portal/SierraNevadaRedFox/tabid/618/Default.aspx Sierra Nevada Red Fox Conservation Assessment EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This conservation assessment provides a science-based, comprehensive assessment of the status of the Sierra Nevada red fox (Vulpes vulpes necator) and its habitat. -
L392 Official Journal
Official Journal L 392 of the European Union Volume 63 English edition Legislation 23 November 2020 Contents II Non-legislative acts REGULATIONS ★ Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1737 of 14 July 2020 amending Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council and Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 as regards the inclusion of certain drug precursors in the list of scheduled substances (1) . 1 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1738 of 16 November 2020 approving non- minor amendments to the specification for a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications (‘Asparago verde di Altedo’ (PGI)) . 8 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1739 of 20 November 2020 amending and correcting Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/761 as regards the quantities available for tariff rate quotas for certain agricultural products included in the WTO schedule of the Union following the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the Union, a tariff quota for poultrymeat originating in Ukraine and a tariff quota for meat of bovine animals originating in Canada . 9 ★ Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2020/1740 of 20 November 2020 setting out the provisions necessary for the implementation of the renewal procedure for active substances, as provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1107/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and repealing Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012 (1) . 20 DECISIONS ★ Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2020/1741 of 20 November 2020 amending the Annex to Implementing Decision 2014/709/EU concerning animal health control measures relating to African swine fever in certain Member States (notified under document C(2020) 8266) (1) . -
Regionálna Veterinárna a Potravinová Správa Bardejov Stöcklova 34, 085 01 Bardejov Č.J.: 1951/2020 V Bardejove, Dňa 25.11.2020
Regionálna veterinárna a potravinová správa Bardejov Stöcklova 34, 085 01 Bardejov Č.j.: 1951/2020 V Bardejove, dňa 25.11.2020 OPATRENIA NA ZABEZPEČENIE KONTROLY A ZABRÁNENIA ŠÍRENIA AFRICKÉHO MORU V INFIKOVANEJ A VYSOKORIZIKOVEJ OBLASTI PRE NEKOMERČNÉ CHOVY – DROBNOCHOVY VRÁTANE CHOVOV S JEDNOU OŠÍPANOU. Regionálna veterinárna a potravinová správa Prešov (ďalej len RVPS Prešov), príslušná podľa § 8 ods. 3 písm. e) v súlade s § 17 ods. 3 zákona č. 39/2007 Z. z. o veterinárnej starostlivosti v platnom znení n a r i a ď u j e - právnickým osobám: • Obec Kríže, Obec Hervartov, Obec Richvald, Obec Šiba, Obec Kľušov, Obec Hertník, Obec Fričkovce, Obec Bartošovce, Obec Kobyly, Obec Osikov, Obec Vaniškovce, Obec Janovce, Obec Tročany, Obec Abrahámovce, Obec Raslavice, Obec Buclovany, Obec Lopúchov, Obec Stuľany, Obec Koprivnica, Obec Kochanovce, Obec Harhaj, Obec Vyšný Kručov, Obec Brezov, Obec Lascov, Obec Marhaň, Obec Kučín, Obec Kožany, Obec Kurima, Obec Nemcovce, Obec Porúbka, Obec Hankovce, Obec Oľšavce, Obec Nižná Voľa, Obec Rešov, Obec Vyšná Voľa, Obec Poliakovce, Obec Dubinné, Obec Hrabovec, Obec Komárov, Obec Lukavica; Obec Lipová, Obec Ortuťová, Obec Šašová, Obec Brezovka, Obec Hažlín, Obec Beloveža, Obec Šarišské Čierne , Obec Andrejová, Mesto Bardejov, Obec Zborov, Obec Smilno, Obec Mikulášová, Obec Nižná Polianka, Obec Varadka, Obec Jedlinka, Obec Vyšná Polianka, Obec Ondavka, Obec Becherov, Obec Chmeľová, Obec Regetovka, Obec Stebnícka Huta, Obec Stebník, Obec Zlaté, Obec Vyšný Tvarožec, Obec Nižný Tvarožec, Obec Cigeľka, Obec -
Small Carnivores of Karnataka: Distribution and Sight Records1
Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society, 104 (2), May-Aug 2007 155-162 SMALL CARNIVORES OF KARNATAKA SMALL CARNIVORES OF KARNATAKA: DISTRIBUTION AND SIGHT RECORDS1 H.N. KUMARA2,3 AND MEWA SINGH2,4 1Accepted November 2006 2 Biopsychology Laboratory, University of Mysore, Mysore 570 006, Karnataka, India. 3Email: [email protected] 4Email: [email protected] During a study from November 2001 to July 2004 on ecology and status of wild mammals in Karnataka, we sighted 143 animals belonging to 11 species of small carnivores of about 17 species that are expected to occur in the state of Karnataka. The sighted species included Leopard Cat, Rustyspotted Cat, Jungle Cat, Small Indian Civet, Asian Palm Civet, Brown Palm Civet, Common Mongoose, Ruddy Mongoose, Stripe-necked Mongoose and unidentified species of Otters. Malabar Civet, Fishing Cat, Brown Mongoose, Nilgiri Marten, and Ratel were not sighted during this study. The Western Ghats alone account for thirteen species of small carnivores of which six are endemic. The sighting of Rustyspotted Cat is the first report from Karnataka. Habitat loss and hunting are the major threats for the small carnivore survival in nature. The Small Indian Civet is exploited for commercial purpose. Hunting technique varies from guns to specially devised traps, and hunting of all the small carnivore species is common in the State. Key words: Felidae, Viverridae, Herpestidae, Mustelidae, Karnataka, threats INTRODUCTION (Mukherjee 1989; Mudappa 2001; Rajamani et al. 2003; Mukherjee et al. 2004). Other than these studies, most of the Mammals of the families Felidae, Viverridae, information on these animals comes from anecdotes or sight Herpestidae, Mustelidae and Procyonidae are generally records, which no doubt, have significantly contributed in called small carnivores. -
UNESCO List of World Heritage Sites in Slovakia
UNESCO list of World Heritage Sites in Slovakia Several of our cultural and natural properties were inscribed into the UNESCO’s World Heritage List. Bardejov and Banská Štiavnica's historical centre and its technical monuments, Spiš Castle- the biggest castle in central Europe, Vlkolínec Village with its wooden houses documenting our traditions and culture, wooden churches situated in eastern Slovakia are just examples of our historical monuments inscribed into the List. We would like to mention some natural treasures from the UNESCO List: unique caves lying in Slovak Paradise, Oak Primaeval Forest in North-East Slovakia. On the other hand, there are some treasures waiting to be inscribed into the List: Gothic wooden altar chiseled out by Master Pavol from Levoča, Limes Romanus-an ancient Rome’s border defence system or Tokai vineyards. Brief Description Spišský Hrad has one of the largest ensembles of 13th and 14th century military, political and religious buildings in eastern Europe, and its Romanesque and Gothic architecture has remained remarkably intact. The extended site features the addition of the historic town-centre of Levoča founded in the 13th and 14th centuries within fortifications. Most of the site has been preserved and it includes the 14th century church of St James with its ten alters of the 15th and 16th centuries, a remarkable collection of polychrome works in the Late Gothic style, including an 18.6 metre high alterpiece by completed around 1510 by Master Paul. Spissky castle, view from Drevenik Outstanding Universal Value The castle of Spišský Hrad, the town of Levoča, the associated sites in Spišské Podhradie, Spišská, Kapitula, and Ţehra constitute a remarkable group of military, urban, political, and religious elements, of a type that was relatively common in medieval Europe, but of which almost none have survived in such a complete condition with equivalent integrity. -
Textová Časť
ATELIÉR URBEKO s.r.o., Konštantínova č.3,080 01 Prešov IČO:31 671 209 zapísaná v obchodnom registri Okresného súdu Prešov, oddiel: Sro, vložka číslo:1050/P T.č.051/77 220 71,Mobil:0905 371634, eee-e---mail:mail: [email protected],[email protected] Územný plán obce NIŽNÝ TVAROŽEC Čistopis Textová čas ť December © 2013 Obsah: A, TEXTOVÁ ČAS Ť I. Základné údaje 1) Hlavné ciele riešenia 2) Vyhodnotenie doterajšieho územného plánu 3) Údaje o súlade riešenia so zadaním II. Riešenie územného plánu 1) Vymedzenie riešeného územia 2) Väzby vyplývajúce z riešenia a zo záväznej časti územného plánu regiónu 3) Základné demografické, sociálne a ekonomické rozvojové predpoklady obce 4) Širšie vz ťahy a rozvoj záujmového územia 5) Urbanistická koncepcia priestorového usporiadania 6) Funk čné využitie územia 7) Riešenie bývania, ob čianskeho vybavenia so sociálnou infraštruktúrou, výroby a rekreácie 7.1)Obyvate ľstvo a bytový fond 7.2) Ob čianska vybavenos ť 7.3) Výroba a sklady 7.4) Rekreácia, kúpe ľníctvo a cestovný ruch 8) Vymedzenie zastavaného územia obce 9) Vymedzenie ochranných pásiem a chránených území pod ľa osobitných predpisov 10) Riešenie záujmov obrany štátu, požiarnej ochrany a ochrany pred povod ňami 11) Ochrana prírody a tvorba krajiny vrátane prvkov územného systému ekologickej stability a ekostabiliza čných opatrení 12) Riešenie verejného dopravného a technického vybavenia 12.1) Doprava a dopravné zariadenia 12.2) Vodné hospodárstvo 12.3) Zásobovanie elektrickou energiou 12.4) Spoje a telekomunika čné zariadenia 12.5) Zásobovanie plynom 12.6) Zásobovanie teplom 12.7) Zariadenia civilnej ochrany 13) Koncepcia starostlivosti o životné prostredie 14) Ochrana kultúrno-historických hodnôt 15) Vymedzenie prieskumných území, chránených ložiskových území a dobývacích priestorov 16) Vymedzenie plôch vyžadujúcich zvýšenú ochranu 17) Vyhodnotenie perspektívneho použitia PPF a LPF na nepo ľnohospodárske ú čely 18) Hodnotenie riešenia z hľadiska environmentálnych, sociálnych a územno- technických dôsledkov 19) Záver III. -
Federal Trade Commission § 301.0
Federal Trade Commission § 301.0 NAME GUIDE § 301.0 Fur products name guide. NAME GUIDE Name Order Family Genus-species Alpaca ...................................... Ungulata ................ Camelidae ............. Lama pacos. Antelope ................................... ......do .................... Bovidae ................. Hippotragus niger and Antilope cervicapra. Badger ..................................... Carnivora ............... Mustelidae ............. Taxida sp. and Meles sp. Bassarisk ................................. ......do .................... Procyonidae .......... Bassariscus astutus. Bear ......................................... ......do .................... Ursidae .................. Ursus sp. Bear, Polar ............................... ......do .................... ......do .................... Thalarctos sp. Beaver ..................................... Rodentia ................ Castoridae ............. Castor canadensis. Burunduk ................................. ......do .................... Sciuridae ............... Eutamias asiaticus. Calf .......................................... Ungulata ................ Bovidae ................. Bos taurus. Cat, Caracal ............................. Carnivora ............... Felidae .................. Caracal caracal. Cat, Domestic .......................... ......do .................... ......do .................... Felis catus. Cat, Lynx ................................. ......do .................... ......do .................... Lynx refus. Cat, Manul ..............................