DOCSLIB.ORG

WRAP THESIS Lamb 1992.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
WRAP THESIS Lamb 1992.Pdf University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of Warwick http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap/34731 This thesis is made available online and is protected by original copyright. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item for information to help you to cite it. Our policy information is available from the repository home page. 1RRATIONAL. THEATRE The Challenge Posed by the Plays of Howard Barker for Con temporary Performance Theory and Practice Three Volumes Volume 1. Bond and Barker - A Comparison By Charles Lamb For the Degree of PhD oint School of Theatre Studies University of Warwick September 1992 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In producing this study, I owe particular thanks to: - the directors, Danny Boyle and Kenny Ireland, for allowing me to observe their rehearsals - the actors and crews of the RSC production of THE BITE OF THE NIGHT and The Wrestling School production of VICTORY for their ideas and suggestions - David Thomas, my supervisor, for reading and commenting on my work - Howard Barker, for being unstinting with his time and generous with advice and assistance SUMMARY This study arose out of an awareness that contemporary performance theories and production techniques were not appropriate to the plays of Howard Barker. The first section, a comparison of Barker with Edward Bond, attempts to 'situate' the former with reference to a major dramatist of the seventies and early eighties. This reveals a number of significant differences, including almost diametrically opposed conceptions of the function of drama. In the second section, I consider Barker against a wider background of deconstructive and postmodernist thinking. As opposed to Bond's Brechtian notion of a Rational theatre, I argue that Barker's theatre is irrational and suggest that irrational interaction is Seduction. Barker's plays are considered from the point of view of a theory of seduction - in particular Jean Baudrillard's. There follows a review of a range of discourses on performance by influential practitioners such as Stanislavsky. Although seduction is identifiable in all their practices, it is almost universally denied or shunned - except by Grotowski. Also the focus of acting technique is invariably on the actor/character relation with little consideration of interaction with others. The third section considers in some detail two plays by Barker - JUDITH and THE CASTLE, analysing them from a seductive perspective. Contents Page 1 CONTENTS Introduction SECTION ONE: Bond and Barker - A Comparison (VOLUME 1) 1. Beginnings - a consideration of early work 1. - the issue of articulacy 2. Literature and Politics - the development of Bond's literary style 62. - the 'rational' play of objects - the 'Irrational' play of subjects 3. History - 'the struggle for reason' 108. - 'pain' SECTION TWO: Seduction (VOLUME 2) 4. Postmodernisin and Theatre - deconstruction 155. - 'realism' arid 'rational theatre' - SzondI's theory 5. Seduction - the basis of an irrational theatre - BaudrIllard 182. - seduction In Barker's plays Contents Page 2 6. Seductive Performance - Barker in performance 228. - the seductive performance - Stanislavsky 7. Stanislavsky's 'heirs' - Meyerhold - Strasberg - Michael Chekhov 258. 8. Brecht and the British Theatre 282. 9. Grotowski and the Academic Theorists 312. SECTION THREE: Analyses Of Plays (VOLUME 3) 10. 'Judith' 342. 11. 'The Castle' 370. NOTES. 468. APPENDIX 1. Interview with Howard Barker 492. APPENDIX 2. Stanislavsky's Method of Physical Actions(Hapgood) 520. APPENDIX 3. Stanislavsky's Method of Physical Actioris(Gordon) 522. APPENDIX 4. Notes on Seduction for 'The Wrestling School' 524. SELECTIVE BIBLIOGRAPHY 533. INTRODUCT ION My point of departure for this study lay with my perception of the inadequacy of contemporary performance theory to cope satisfactorily with the dramas of Howard Barker. This perception was based on my own experience of directing and acting in Barker plays as well as a wide acquaintanceship with major professional productions of his work. I felt somehow that the full dramatic potential especially of the later texts was not being realised in performance. On the other hand there was throughout the sixties, seventies and eighties, an unprecedented interest in and awareness of theatre as theatre. By this I mean that the theatrical performance was no longer seen as a simple 'fleshing out' of the dramatic text but rather as a craft in its own right quite separate from literary fiction and from film. This period witnessed the widespread dissemination of Theatre Studies in Universities and Colleges, while In schools drama was established as an independent subject within the curriculum. There was, consequently, a considerable new interest in theoretical approaches o performance. During the seventies, I was personally very much drawn to the dramas of Edward Bond. As a school teacher I was searching for playscripts suitable to stage with students which would at the same time be interesting and (i) Introduction challenging for me to direct. So my first real acquaintances.ip..-with Bond was Vat. when I took THE NARROW ROAD TO THE DEEP NORTH from a Foyles' bookshelf and skim-read it. This was very much my practice at the time: first a glance at the cast list - which ruled out most plays immediately; most others were returned to the shelf after a couple of pages of scene one. I read THE NARROW ROAD, however, in Its entirety and decided there and then to stage it. I wonder now what attracted me to it? I had never seen or read a Bond play, though I had heard of Bond In connection with the SAVED and EARLY MORNING controversies. Apart from strictly practical considerations, there were three things in the maIne I feel, which recommended Bond's text to me: firstly there was the literary quality of the writing. The text was poetic without being rarefied or versified' (like Fry) but at the same time had a certain colloquial force. Bond seemed to juxtapose speech from registers which had hitherto existed in hermetically sealed worlds the very clash of which created a kind of unique music rarely found outside Shakespeare. Secondly, the play was full of dramatic incident, vivid, 'theatrical' characters and fascinating visual images which offered good opportunities for a youthful and physical ensemble. Thirdly, the play seemed to evade all the conventional processes of definition - tragedy? comedy? farce? caricature characters? It didn't fit the established slots but seemed to unwind along a trajectory defined solely by its own unique and secret inner necessity: that seemed to me to be a good thing. Staging the play served only to increase my interest in and respect for Bond as a dramatist. I read all of his plays and attended as many professional productions of his work as I could. A production (ii) Introduction of LEAR by the RSC in The Other Place at Stratford provided one of the most dramatically powerful and aesthetically rich theatrical experiences I had ever witnessed. Bond seemed at his peak to have attained a complete technical mastery to complement his creative Imagination. During this period, Bond was engaged not merely In writing plays but also in setting out his political and social views and relating these to his crusade for a 'Rational Theatre'. This latter coincided fairly closely with the aims of Brecht whose approach to performance enjoyed a certain 'radical' vogue in Britain during the seventies and eighties. During the seventies, I could not really see how there could be any substantial case against a theatre dedicated to a clear sense of social, moral and (consequently) political purpose. I found myself broadly In sympathy with Bond's views. Also during the seventies, I became interested In the plays of Howard Barker who tended to be grouped with a generation of radical, 'political' dramatists of a post-war generation younger than Bond - people like Brenton or Hare. Having produced some of Barker's work, it became clear to me that he was a very different sort of writer from Bond. Especially as Bond defined further his conception of a Rational Theatre. These were not merely differences of style but profound divergences about the role of theatre. Bond was in tune with a particular strand of the received thinking of his times and pushed this line of thought to an extreme - effectively isolating himself in the process. Barker was also increasingly at odds with the current theatrical climate(directors) of 70s (iii.) Introduction and 80s but in an entirely different way. he appeared to be pursuing a more classical and perhaps conservative aesthetic - though his plays did not demonstrate the 'accessibility' that such an approach might suggest; on the contrary they became increasingly 'difficult.' There is a sense now that directors have very little idea of how to 'cope' with these texts. I think this is in no small measure owing to the lack of any kind of theoretical basis on which to proceed with them. My starting point for this exploration was the problem - the challenge - that Barker's plays posed to contemporary performance theory. I therefore decided initally to examine Barker in conjunction with a comparable writer whose work has, in my opinion, been successfully staged - Edward Bond. I felt that such an exercise offered a number of significant parallels and contrasts which would be useful in initially 'situating' Barker's dramaturgy within the context of contemporary British theatre. While working on this study, I have been fortunate in being permitted to observe rehearsals of professional productions of Barker's plays. It was at one of these - during the RSC's work on THE BITE OF THE NIGHT, that I devised the strategy which informs the second section of this study. The director, Danny Boyle, was having difficulty working on some scenes in the third act and I noticed that a consistent pattern was emerging.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter Three Howard Barker: the Freedom and Constraint of the Artist’S Imagination
    80 Chapter Three Howard Barker: The Freedom and Constraint of the Artist’s Imagination During the 1980s, theatrical culture was liable to a variety of political and economic pressures that “produced an enormous sense of dislocation and dissatisfaction”.1 Besides funding cuts, the aesthetic merits of artistic values did not seem to be understood by the politicians. So, theatre was not only subject to funding cuts, but also to censorship, as we shall see. Government interference in performance and writing led to a sense of insecurity. So, works which were economically unviable were threatened with being banned or cancelled. In doing so, the commissioning of artists began to depend entirely on the criteria of the ruling political party – the Conservatives – who ignored the artists’ true feelings. In other words, the aesthetic value of artworks was ignored in favour of monetarism. Instead, the duty of the artist was to be devoted to espousing political ideals. The dilemma of the artist, therefore, was how did artists enjoy a degree of freedom without being censored? And if the artist failed to match the criteria of the ruling political party, what was the price of free expression? All these questions suggest radical changes in the British theatre system which is very complicated ideologically in respect to democracy, sponsorship and how the artists responded to it. Howard Barker is a writer who began to grapple with these questions when he became suspicious of the effectiveness of politically committed theatre at about the same time that Thatcher was elected as Prime Minister. Although he is marginalized in his country, Barker has remained a challenging writer who dismantled the strictness of Conservative values during Thatcher’s time.
    [Show full text]
  • Qurrat Ann Kadwani: Still Calling Her Q!
    1 More Next Blog» Create Blog Sign In InfiniteBody art and creative consciousness by Eva Yaa Asantewaa Tuesday, May 6, 2014 Your Host Qurrat Ann Kadwani: Still calling her Q! Eva Yaa Asantewaa Follow View my complete profile My Pages Home About Eva Yaa Asantewaa Getting to know Eva (interview) Qurrat Ann Kadwani Eva's Tarot site (photo Bolti Studios) Interview on Tarot Talk Contact Eva Name Email * Message * Send Contribute to InfiniteBody Subscribe to IB's feed Click to subscribe to InfiniteBody RSS Get InfiniteBody by Email Talented and personable Qurrat Ann Kadwani (whose solo show, They Call Me Q!, I wrote about Email address... Submit here) is back and, I hope, every bit as "wicked smart and genuinely funny" as I observed back in September. Now she's bringing the show to the Off Broadway St. Luke's Theatre , May 19-June 4, Mondays at 7pm and Wednesdays at 8pm. THEY CALL ME Q is the story of an Indian girl growing up in the Boogie Down Bronx who gracefully seeks balance between the cultural pressures brought forth by her traditional InfiniteBody Archive parents and wanting acceptance into her new culture. Along the journey, Qurrat Ann Kadwani transforms into 13 characters that have shaped her life including her parents, ► 2015 (222) Caucasian teachers, Puerto Rican classmates, and African-American friends. Laden with ▼ 2014 (648) heart and abundant humor, THEY CALL ME Q speaks to the universal search for identity ► December (55) experienced by immigrants of all nationalities. ► November (55) Program, schedule and ticket information ► October (56) ► September (42) St.
    [Show full text]
  • Prologue: 'After Auschwitz': Survival of the Aesthetic
    Notes Prologue: ‘After Auschwitz’: Survival of the Aesthetic 1. In 1959 the German poet Hans Magnus Enzensberger called Adorno’s state- ment ‘one of the harshest judgments that can be made about our times: after Auschwitz it is impossible to write poetry’, and urges that ‘if we want to con- tinue to live, this sentence must be repudiated’. Hans Magnus Enzensberger, ‘Die Steine der Freiheit’ in Petra Kiedaisch (ed.). Lyrik nach Auschwitz? Adorno und die Dichter (73). 2. Herbert Marcuse, too, criticised the tendency toward uniformity and repres- sion of individuality in modern technological society in his seminal 1964 study One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced industrial Society. 3. For philosophers such as Hannah Arendt the culmination of totalitar- ian power as executed in the camps led not only to the degradation and extermination of people, it also opened profound and important questions about our understanding of humanity and ethics (see: Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism). The question of an ethical response to Auschwitz also preoc- cupies Giorgio Agamben who argues that an ethical attempt to bear witness (testimony) to Auschwitz must inevitably confront the impossibility of speak- ing without, however, condemning Auschwitz to the ‘forever incomprehensi- ble’ (Remnants of Auschwitz 11). 4. See Alan Milchman and Alan Rosenberg’s Postmodernism and the Holocaust. However, Adorno’s response to the Holocaust is not discussed in this volume. His most notable reflections on Auschwitz can be found in Negative Dialectics (‘Meditations on Metaphysics’), Metaphysics: Concepts and Problems (1965), and in the collection Can one Live after Auschwitz? 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating the Notion of Catharsis and Probing the Concept of Pain In
    حوليات آداب عني مشس اجمللد 46 ) عدد إبريل – يونيه 2018( http://www.aafu.journals.ekb.eg جامعة عني مشس )دورية علمية حملمة( كلية اﻵداب Investigating the Notion of : Beyond the Zone of Comfort Catharsis and Probing the Concept of Pain in Howard Barker's 'Blok/Eko'and Sarah Kane's '4.48 Psychosis'. Neval Nabil Mahmoud Abdullah * Lecture College of Language & Communication - Arab Academy for Science, Technology& Maritime Transport. Abstract: The objective of this paper is to take us on a journey with an odd selection of two enigmatic and controversial British playwrights – Howard Barker and Sarah Kane – whose challenging theatrical works take us well beyond the zone of comfort we might be used to. Through a close textual analysis and a substantial critical evaluation of two crucial productions from the domain of their 'alien to our conception' of dramatic art, the present paper aims at going beyond just surveying their common shock tactics, showing parallels, or pointing out elements of recurrence in their texts. The aim is to get to the bottom of their experiential theatres by considering their transcendental tragic visions for a better exploration of reality and for a possible rebirth of the individual experience. Having explored the dark rooms of Barker's and Kane's self-styled theatres, particularly in their two significant dramatic works – 'Blok/Eko' and '4.48 Psychosis' respectively, the present study discerns that there is a noticeable intent and craft behind both playwrights' crafty 'violations' of the audience's personal space and comfort zones. Barker's and Kane's extremism is part of their attempt to question and criticize the audience's passive participation, foreground an awakening to extreme realities, propose a shift from or challenge to Aristotle's traditional concept of catharsis, and call into question our accepted interpretation of pain.
    [Show full text]
  • A Character Type in the Plays of Edward Bond
    A Character Type in the Plays of Edward Bond Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Frank A. Torma, M. A. Graduate Program in English The Ohio State University 2010 Dissertation Committee: Jon Erickson, Advisor Richard Green Joy Reilly Copyright by Frank Anthony Torma 2010 Abstract To evaluate a young firebrand later in his career, as this dissertation attempts in regard to British playwright Edward Bond, is to see not the end of fireworks, but the fireworks no longer creating the same provocative results. Pursuing a career as a playwright and theorist in the theatre since the early 1960s, Bond has been the exciting new star of the Royal Court Theatre and, more recently, the predictable producer of plays displaying the same themes and strategies that once brought unsettling theatre to the audience in the decades past. The dissertation is an attempt to evaluate Bond, noting his influences, such as Beckett, Brecht, Shakespeare, and the postmodern, and charting the course of his career alongside other dramatists when it seems appropriate. Edward Bond‟s characters of Len in Saved, the Gravedigger‟s Boy in Lear, Leonard in In the Company of Men, and the character in a number of other Bond plays provide a means to understand Bond‟s aesthetic and political purposes. Len is a jumpy young man incapable of bravery; the Gravedigger‟s Boy is the earnest young man destroyed too early by total war; Leonard is a needy, spoiled youth destroyed by big business.
    [Show full text]
  • Writing Figures of Political Resistance for the British Stage Vol1.Pdf
    Writing Figures of Political Resistance for the British Stage Volume One (of Two) Matthew John Midgley PhD University of York Theatre, Film and Television September 2015 Writing Figures of Resistance for the British Stage Abstract This thesis explores the process of writing figures of political resistance for the British stage prior to and during the neoliberal era (1980 to the present). The work of established political playwrights is examined in relation to the socio-political context in which it was produced, providing insights into the challenges playwrights have faced in creating characters who effectively resist the status quo. These challenges are contextualised by Britain’s imperial history and the UK’s ongoing participation in newer forms of imperialism, the pressures of neoliberalism on the arts, and widespread political disengagement. These insights inform reflexive analysis of my own playwriting. Chapter One provides an account of the changing strategies and dramaturgy of oppositional playwriting from 1956 to the present, considering the strengths of different approaches to creating figures of political resistance and my response to them. Three models of resistance are considered in Chapter Two: that of the individual, the collective, and documentary resistance. Each model provides a framework through which to analyse figures of resistance in plays and evaluate the strategies of established playwrights in negotiating creative challenges. These models are developed through subsequent chapters focussed upon the subjects tackled in my plays. Chapter Three looks at climate change and plays responding to it in reflecting upon my creative process in The Ends. Chapter Four explores resistance to the Iraq War, my own military experience and the challenge of writing autobiographically.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    S K E N È Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies 5:2 2019 SKENÈ Journal of Theatre and Drama Studies Founded by Guido Avezzù, Silvia Bigliazzi, and Alessandro Serpieri Executive Editor Guido Avezzù. General Editors Guido Avezzù, Silvia Bigliazzi. Editorial Board Simona Brunetti, Francesco Lupi, Nicola Pasqualicchio, Susan Payne, Gherardo Ugolini. Managing Editor Francesco Lupi. Assistant Managing Editors Valentina Adami, Emanuel Stelzer, Roberta Zanoni. Books Reviews Editors Chiara Battisti, Sidia Fiorato Staff Francesco Dall’Olio, Bianca Del Villano, Marco Duranti, Carina Louise Fernandes, Maria Serena Marchesi, Antonietta Provenza, Savina Stevanato. Advisory Board Anna Maria Belardinelli, Anton Bierl, Enoch Brater, Jean-Christophe Cavallin, Richard Allen Cave, Rosy Colombo, Claudia Corti, Marco De Marinis, Tobias Döring, Pavel Drábek, Paul Edmondson, Keir Douglas Elam, Ewan Fernie, Patrick Finglass, Enrico Giaccherini, Mark Griffith, Daniela Guardamagna, Stephen Halliwell, Robert Henke, Pierre Judet de la Combe, Eric Nicholson, Guido Paduano, Franco Perrelli, Didier Plassard, Donna Shalev, Susanne Wofford. Copyright © 2019 SKENÈ Published in December 2019 All rights reserved. ISSN 2421-4353 No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any means without permission from the publisher. SKENÈ Theatre and Drama Studies http://skenejournal.skeneproject.it [email protected] Dir. Resp. (aut. Trib. di Verona): Guido Avezzù P.O. Box 149 c/o Mail Boxes Etc. (MBE150) – Viale Col. Galliano, 51, 37138, Verona (I) Contents Manuela Giordano
    [Show full text]
  • The Marowitz Hamlet, Running 4 the MAROWITZ HAMLET March 15 – 24, 2012 at the University of Victoria
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: February 21, 2012 LEGENDARY MAN OF THEATRE REDISCOVERS HAMLET’S WORLD Phoenix presents collage of Shakespeare’s classic tragedy 2011/2012 Season Imagine if someone were to take Shakespeare’s play, cut it up, and piece it back together again so that we, the audience, could experience the masterpiece from a new perspective. This is the life’s work of one illustrious man of the theatre, Charles Marowitz, as the Phoenix Theatre presents his collage of Hamlet in The Marowitz Hamlet, running 4 THE MAROWITZ HAMLET March 15 – 24, 2012 at the University of Victoria. March 15 – 24, 2012 An acclaimed playwright, director and critic who has worked closely with Peter Brook at the Royal Shakespeare Company, By William Shakespeare & Charles Marowitz on Broadway and in London’s West End, Marowitz has notoriously reinterpreted almost a dozen Shakespeare plays over Guest Director Charles Marowitz Co-Director Fran Gebhard his celebrated career. Students at the Department of Theatre have had the rare opportunity to design for, and rehearse Set and Lighting Designer Bryan Kenney with, this distinguished artist as he directs his own collage of Hamlet for Victoria audiences. Unfortunately, this Costume Designer Michelle Lo mentoring process had to be cut short as Mr. Marowitz had to return to his home in Los Angeles due to health issues. Stage Manager Denay Amaral Faculty member Fran Gebhard, who is also a close friend of Marowitz, is continuing his work. “I’m confident in the vision that I have shared with the designers over the past year and the actors during these past three weeks.
    [Show full text]
  • Taha Nasir Salman Assist. Prof. Dr. Majeed Mohammed Midhin
    University of Anbar College of Education for Humanities Department of English The Freedom of Expression and the Dilemma of the Artist: A Thematic Study of Howard Barker’s ‘Scenes from an Execution’ By Taha Nasir Salman Supervised By Assist. Prof. Dr. Majeed Mohammed Midhin April, 2018 Dedication I dedicate this to my mother and father; who help me to advance in my life and in my career … Allah bless you and protect you. To my sister and brothers … I love you all and I ask Allah to safe and protect you. Everywhere you go, I wish you the success. To my lovely Noora … I ask Allah to protect you and I hope that one day we might be a good family. If this research is a success, I dedicate it everyone who taught me even a single letter, or simply a word … Acknowledgements I extremely acknowledge the help and the assistance of the Assist. Professor Dr. Majeed Mohammed Midhin for his ideas and thoughts in order to complete this research paper. Very special thanks to my teaching staff in the department of English, College Education for Humanities, at the University of Anbar. I also acknowledge my colleagues’ help and friends’ advice for their contribution to reach such this level. I hope Allah bless them all. Finally, everyone loves me … I love you, too. Contents Dedication Acknowledgement Introduction ................................................................................... 1 Chapter One 1.1 Howard Barker as an Influential British Playwright .............. 4 1.2 Barker’s Theatre Theory ...................................................... 6 Scenes from an Execution (1984): A Critical Study ................. 10 Conclusion ................................................................................... 15 Abstract: British dramatists in the 1980s found themselves in a struggle with the newly applied political and economic laws that change the whole atmosphere of the British culture as well as to the theatre.
    [Show full text]
  • History in the Age of Fracture
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2010 The Politics of Time in Recent English History Plays Jay M. Gipson-King Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVSERITY COLLEGE OF VISUAL ARTS, THEATRE, AND DANCE HISTORY IN THE AGE OF FRACTURE: THE POLITICS OF TIME IN RECENT ENGLISH HISTORY PLAYS By JAY M. GIPSON-KING A Dissertation submitted to the School of Theatre in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester: 2010 The members of the committee approve the dissertation of Jay M. Gipson-King defended on October 27, 2010. Mary Karen Dahl Professor Directing Dissertation James O‘Rourke University Representative Natalya Baldyga Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to express my great appreciation to the vast number of people who made this dissertation possible. First and foremost, I would like to thank my committee chair, Mary Karen Dahl, for her guidance throughout this project and my graduate career; it is due to her that I developed my love of contemporary British theatre in the first place. I also thank committee member Natalya Baldyga, for sharing her love of the Futurists; University Representative James O‘Rourke, for his insightful reading of the manuscript and his outside perspective; former committee member Caroline Joan S. (―Kay‖) Picart, whose early feedback helped shape the structure the prospectus; and former committee member Amit Rai, who introduced me to affect theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Barker's No End of Blame: from Theatre of Catastrophe to Historiographic Metadrama1
    DTCF Dergisi 59.2 (2019): 912-939 HOWARD BARKER'S NO END OF BLAME: FROM THEATRE OF CATASTROPHE TO HISTORIOGRAPHIC METADRAMA1 HOWARD BARKER'IN SUÇLAMANIN SONU YOK OYUNU: FELAKET TİYATROSUNDAN TARİHYAZIMSAL ÜSTTİYATROYA Yiğit SÜMBÜL Arş. Gör. Dr., Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, İngiliz Dili ve Edebiyatı Anabilim Dalı, [email protected] Abstract Howard Barker's theatre has always been dealt with as a characteristically distinctive Makale Bilgisi kind with respect to the playwright's formulation of his self-crafted dramatic genre Gönderildiği tarih: 1 Eylül 2019 'Theatre of Catastrophe' whose main principles were listed in his two monumental books Kabul edildiği tarih: 13 Kasım 2019 on drama and performance, Arguments for a Theatre and Death, the One and the Art of Yayınlanma tarihi: 25 Aralık 2019 Theatre. In these treatises, Barker designates a new genre which differentiates itself from the contemporary mainstream tradition of Brechtian political drama, dominating British stages for decades, with its non-didactic, anti-cathartic outlook aiming to divert the Article Info audience into individual responses rather than a collective moral improvement. Barker's Date submitted: 1 September 2019 plays also stand apart from the mainstream drama in their concern with the tragic Date accepted: 13 November 2019 experience rather than the political and moral message with an elaborate, lyrical language Date published: 25 December 2019 and obscurity of meaning. However, this study aims to bring a new perspective to the understanding of Barker's drama, with specic examples from his famous play No End of Blame (1981) with an emphasis on the use of historical subject matter and the choice of Anahtar sözcükler characters from among artists.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Modern Shakespeare Festivals
    UNIVERSIDAD DE MURCIA ESCUELA INTERNACIONAL DE DOCTORADO Festival Shakespeare: Celebrating the Plays on the Stage Festival Shakespeare: Celebrando las Obras en la Escena Dª Isabel Guerrero Llorente 2017 Page intentionally left blank. 2 Agradecimientos / Acknoledgements / Remerciments Estas páginas han sido escritas en lugares muy diversos: la sala becarios en la Universidad de Murcia, la British Library de Londres, el centro de investigación IRLC en Montpellier, los archivos de la National Library of Scotland, la Maison Jean Vilar de Aviñón, la biblioteca del Graduate Center de la City University of New York –justo al pie del Empire State–, mi habitación en Torre Pacheco en casa de mis padres, habitaciones que compartí con Luis en Madrid, Londres y Murcia, trenes con destinos varios, hoteles en Canadá, cafeterías en Harlem, algún retazo corregido en un avión y salas de espera. Ellas son la causa y el fruto de múltiples idas y venidas durante cuatro años, ayudándome a aunar las que son mis tres grandes pasiones: viajar, el estudio y el teatro.1 Si bien los lugares han sido esenciales para definir lo que aquí se recoge, aún más primordial han sido mis compañeros en este viaje, a los que hoy, por fin, toca darles las gracias. Mis primeras gracias son para mi directora de tesis, Clara Calvo. Gracias, Clara, por la confianza depositada en mí estos años. Gracias por propulsar tantos viajes intelectuales. Gracias también a Ángel-Luis Pujante y Vicente Cervera, quienes leyeron una versión preliminar de algunos capítulos y cuyos consejos han sido fundamentales para su mejora. Juanfra Cerdá fue uno de los primeros lectores de la propuesta primigenia y consejero excepcional en todo este proceso.
    [Show full text]