Sediment & Erosion Control on Construction Sites Field

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sediment & Erosion Control on Construction Sites Field SEDIMENT & EROSION CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION SITES FIELD GUIDE Cooperative Extension Service University of the Virgin Islands #2 John Brewers Bay St. Thomas, USVI 00802-9990 (340) 693-1082 http://rps.uvi.edu/CES/wqindex.html Division of Environmental Protection V.I. Department of Planning & Natural Resources 45 Mars Hill Frederiksted, USVI 00841 (340) 773-1082 http://www.dpnr.gov.vi/ This Sediment & Erosion Control on Construction Sites Field Guide is published by the University of the Virgin Islands Cooperative Extension Service, Kwame Garcia, State Director. No endorsement of products or Published by the University of the Virgin Islands Cooperative Extension Service firms is intended, nor is criticism implied of those not mentioned. Issued by the Virgin Islands Cooperative Extension Service and the U.S. Department of Agriculture in furtherance of the acts of May 8 and June 30, Funded by a federal Clean Water Act grant from the Virgin Islands Department of Planning 1914. Extension programs and policies are consistent with federal and state laws and regulations on and Natural Resources §319(h) Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Program. nondiscrimination regarding race, color, national origin, religion, gender, age, disability or gender preference. SEDIMENT & EROSION Best Management Practices to Control Sediment & Erosion on Construction Sites SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL ON CONTROL ON CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION SITES FIELD GUIDE SITES FIELD GUIDE INTRODUCTION.............................................. 1 BEFORE EARTH CHANGE....................................... 2 Preserve and Protect Natural Vegetation ............................... 3 Perimeter Dikes and Swales........................................ 5 Silt Fencing................................................... 6 DURING EARTH CHANGE....................................... 8 Land Grading ................................................. 8 Stabilized Construction Entrance ................................... 10 Soil Sealers / Binders ........................................... 11 Dirt Road Drainage ............................................ 12 Soil Retaining Walls............................................ 14 Temporary Seeding ............................................ 16 Mulches, Mats and Geotextiles..................................... 18 Filter Strips.................................................. 20 Drainage Swales............................................... 22 Temporary Storm Drain Diversion .................................. 24 Check Dams ................................................. 25 Sediment Trap................................................ 26 Temporary Sediment Basin ....................................... 29 Storm Drain Inlet Protection ...................................... 30 Outlet Protection.............................................. 31 Gabion Inflow Protection ........................................ 33 AFTER EARTH CHANGE ....................................... 34 Permanent Seeding and Planting.................................... 34 Porous Paving ................................................ 36 Rain Gardens ................................................ 38 REFERENCES................................................ 39 Published by the University of the Virgin Islands Cooperative Extension Service Funded by a federal Clean Water Act grant from the Virgin Islands Department of Planning and Natural Resources §319(h) Nonpoint Source Pollution Management Program. i Best Management Practices to Control Sediment & Erosion on Construction Sites Best Management Practices to Control Sediment & Erosion on Construction Sites INTRODUCTION BEFORE EARTH CHANGE Sediment eroded from dirt roads, construction sites and other cleared areas is the number Planning before clearing and construction is important to conserve valuable topsoil, prevent one pollutant harming water quality in the Virgin Islands (DPNR-DEP & USDA-NRCS, costly landslide and flooding problems, conserve natural areas and native species, reduce 1998). A 1986 study of erosion rates on St. Thomas and St. Croix estimated erosion from paved areas (impervious cover), prevent property damage and minimize stormwater runoff dirt roads to be 591 tons/acre/year (Wernicke, Seymour & Mangold, 1986). Studies of ero- and downstream pollution. The first step in this planning process is to identify the physical sion rates in St. John’s Fish Bay watershed found soil loss from dirt roads to be between 100 characteristics of the property: soils, topography (slopes, rock outcrops, etc.), hydrology to 600 tons per year (MacDonald, et al., 1997; Sampson, 1997). Therefore, controlling ero- (guts, ponds, water flow paths), and vegetation (endangered species, large trees). sion and soil loss on construction sites, dirt roads and other cleared areas is key to protecting V.I. coastal waters. Knowing soil properties on site prior to construction (or even purchase) is important to select the best site for intended use and prevent costly mistakes. The USDA Natural There is a big difference between practices that prevent or reduce erosion and those that Resources Conservation Service, through it’s Soil Survey of the U.S. Virgin Islands, has rated remove soil (or sediment) from stormwater. Erosion control practices hold soil in place and soils for limitations for different uses such as septic systems, construction fill, road beds, and reduce soil removal by storm water. The most effective way to control erosion is to building foundations. Common soil limitations found in the Virgin Islands include high preserve existing vegetation and replant cleared or bare areas as soon as shrink-swell clays, high soil erodibility, very steep slopes, shallow or stony soils, and possible. excessively dry climate. Sediment control practices remove eroded soil from runoff before it leaves the property. Knowing the site’s topography is important so that the building designer and contractor can These practices are NOT as effective as erosion control because they do not remove most work with the natural contour of the land to reduce erosion, minimize excavation, reduce clay particles, and most of the soils in the Virgin Islands are clay. For example, clay particles flooding and minimize costs. The topographic site features that should be mapped for the site pass through silt fence material and take a very long time to settle out of runoff in holding include slope, rock outcrops, water features and floodplains. ponds. It is much easier and more cost-effective to keep the soil in place than it is to attempt to remove soil from stormwater. The hydrology of a site is very important to minimize flooding, erosion and property damage both on and off site. The information that is important to know includes the water pathways An effective sediment and erosion control plan should: across the property, whether or not guts or wetlands are present on the property, the depth C Minimize clearing: use site fingerprinting, buffers/setbacks, construction phasing. to the groundwater, the distance to nearby surface waters (guts, ponds, wetlands, coastal waters) C Prevent off-site runoff from flowing across bare soils: use perimeter dikes/ and whether or not the property is in a floodplain. swales, diversions. C Stabilize bare soils on the site: use erosion control mats, planting, retaining walls. It is also important to scout the vegetation on the property to observe the existing C Remove sediment from runoff before it leaves the site: use stabilized construc- vegetation types (to know what kinds of vegetation are native and also what can be planted tion entrances/exits, silt fences, sediment traps, check dams. after construction), and to determine if and where there are endangered species, critical C Plan soil disturbance activities for the dry season. habitats, and large trees located on the site. This field guide provides a brief description of and installation information for sediment and Preserving existing vegetation and re-planting cleared/bare soils as soon as erosion control practices that should be installed during all phases of construction: before possible after earth change is the most effective way to control erosion. Plant land clearing (or earth change), during land clearing and construction, and after construc- cover reduces erosion potential by: tion. Some practices can be used in more than one phase of construction, and so are intro- duced at the first instance where they can be used. Sediment & erosion control practice • Protecting the soil surface from the impact of falling rain drops (reducing erosion); selection for construction sites should be based on the type of construction activity and the • Slowing runoff velocity (or speed) and allowing sediment to settle out (reducing off-site site conditions (soils, slope, vegetation). More detailed practice design and installation infor- sediment loss); mation can be found in the 2002 V.I. Environmental Protection Handbook (Wright, • Physically holding the soil in place with plant roots (erosion control); and 2002). • Increasing infiltration (or seepage) rates by improving the soil’s structure and porosity. 1 2 Best Management Practices to Control Sediment & Erosion on Construction Sites Best Management Practices to Control Sediment & Erosion on Construction Sites Preserve & Protect Natural Vegetation Vegetation preservation and protection minimizes the amount of disturbed soil exposed to the erosive forces of wind and rain, and provides natural buffers to slow runoff and filter
Recommended publications
  • The Role of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control: an Overview
    Geotextiles and Geomembranes I I (1992) 535-550 The Role of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control: An Overview M. S. Theisen Erosion Control Materials, Synthetic Industries, Construction Products Division, 4019 Industry Drive, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37416, USA ABSTRACT The use ofgeosynthetic erosion and sediment materials continues to expand at a rapid pace. From their early beginnings in the late 1950s, geosynthetic materials today are the backbone of the erosion and sediment control industry. Geosynthetic components are an integral part of erosion and sediment materials ranging from temporary products such as hydraulic mulch geofibers, plastic erosion control meshes and nettings, erosion control blankets and silt fences to high performance turf reinforcement mats, geocellular confinement systems, erosion control geotextiles andfabric formed revetments. This paper provides a brief overview of these materials and concepts. INTRODUCTION Hopefully we are entering a new environmental era where concern for the protection of our planet's natural resources will reach global proportions. Continued technological advances have led to improved monitoring of Earth's vital signs. As such, prior theoretical modeling of environmental concerns such as the greenhouse effect, ozone depletion, rising sea levels, deforestation, drought, accelerated erosion, sediment loading of waterways, species extinction and the eventual downfall of mankind appear chillingly realistic. 535 536 M. S. Theisen Slogans such as 'Think globally, act locally', 'Love your mother' and 'Someone always lives downstream' are spearheading the efforts of numerous preservation groups. With the continued demise of oppressive governments, optimism for world peace and an unprecedented feeling of global unity, a spirit of environmental cooperation is beginning to prevail.
    [Show full text]
  • Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repair Gavins Point Dam, SD
    SPECIFICATIONS & DRAWINGS (Purchase Order - For Construction Contract) Solicitation Number W9128F21Q0018 ____________________________________________________________ Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repair Gavins Point Dam, SD March 2021 US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. AUDUBON BEND GRAVEL ROAD REPAIR GAVINS POINT DAM, SD PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS 00 10 00-3 PRICING SCHEDULE STATEMENT OF WORK 00 73 00 SUPPLEMENTARY CONDITIONS (SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS)FOR PURCHASE ORDERS DIVISION 01 - GENERAL REQUIREMENTS 01 22 00 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES 01 41 26.02 24 (NEBRASKA) NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR STORM WATER DISCHARGES FROM CONSTRUCTION SITES 01 57 20.00 10 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 01 57 23 TEMPORARY STORM WATER POLLUTION CONTROL DRAWINGS -- End of Project Table of Contents -- Page 1 This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing. Audubon Bend Gravel Road Repairs, Gavins Point Dam, NE GP82 SECTION 00 10 00 PRICING SCHEDULE CLIN DESCRIPTION QTY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT BASE ITEMS 0001 Mobilization and Demobilization 1 JOB XXX $_______________ Blade entire length of road surface prior to placing gravel to smooth out 0002 1 JOB XXX $_______________ scour holes, rebuild crown. Includes areas over culverts. – 4,750 FEET Reset existing 24’’ CMP with flared 0003 ends to properly drain to North East – 1 JOB XXX $_______________ 1 EACH. Install new USACE provided 48’’ 0004 culvert with flared end (includes trees’ 1 JOB XXX $_______________ removal as necessary) – 1 EACH. Reconstruct approximately 270’ of 0005 eroded road at the existing culvert 720 CY $_______________ $_______________ (includes sodding and seeding).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Geosynthetics in Erosion and Sediment Control
    Presented at GRI-25, Geosynthetics Research Institute, Long Beach, CA, 2013 THE EVOLUTION OF GEOSYNTHETICS IN EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL C. Joel Sprague TRI/Environmental, Inc., Greenville, SC ABSTRACT Much of the development of geosynthetics technology in environmental applications has been in response to government regulations. This is certainly true for geosynthetics used in erosion and sediment control. Geosynthetics continue to replace traditional materials such as soil and stone in performing important engineering functions in erosion and sediment control applications while simultaneously introducing greater versatility and cost-effectiveness. Geosynthetics are widely used as a “carrier” for degradable materials to the enhancement of vegetative establishment; as nondegradable materials to extend the erosion control limits of vegetation or soil; as primary slope or channel linings; as components in silt fences and turbidity curtains; and as a component in an ever growing array of sediment retention devices. Along with the introduction of geosynthetics into this wide range of applications has come the need for industry-wide initiatives to promote their correct use and new test methods to characterize them. All of which, are a “work in progress”. THE NEED FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS Much of the development of geosynthetics technology related to erosion and sediment control applications has been in response to government regulations. A progression of regulatory actions has brought a national focus on erosion and sediment control, including: Amendments to the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1985) - eliminating discharge of any pollutant to navigable waters. The Clean Water Act (1987) - requiring National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permits for large construction sites.
    [Show full text]
  • Erosion and Sediment Control Plan Checklist
    Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan Checklist Page 1 of 4 What is an Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan? Erosion and sediment control is much more than silt fence and hay bales. Prior to developing an Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Plan (EPSCP), it is important to have minimized the areas of disturbed soils and the duration of exposure. It is also imperative to control water at up- slope site perimeters, control water on-site, control sediment on-site, and control sediment at the downslope site perimeters. An EPSCP is the final element in the erosion and sediment control planning process and a necessary component of an Act 250 permit application. The EPSCP ensures that sediment transport is addressed in one of the most crucial stages of the project: the planning stage. A good erosion prevention and sediment control plan first minimizes the extent of disturbance by focusing on erosion control (minimizing disturbed areas, seeding, mulching, matting) by controlling the amount of soil that can run off and by stabilizing exposed soil. Sediment control measures (i.e. stabilized construction entrances) then focus on any sediment that has escaped your erosion control measures. Erosion prevention measures are far more effective than sediment control measures (such as silt fence) and should be the primary focus of any EPSCP. An EPSCP has five primary components: 1. Location map (USGS and other) 2. Existing conditions site plan 3. Grading plan and construction timetable 4. Erosion prevention and sediment control site plan and timetable 5. Narrative briefly describing the four plans The location map shows the proximity of the site to any surface water bodies, roads, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Wisconsin's Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan FFY 2016-2020
    WISCONSIN’S Wisconsin’s NONPOINT SOURCE approach to addressing water quality impacts from PROGRAM nonpoint source MANAGEMENT PLAN pollution. FFY 2016-2020 Approved by EPA on September 18, 2015 Wisconsin’s Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan – FFY 2016-2020 Table of Contents Acronyms & Abbreviations ............................................................................................................................ 3 Chapter 1 The State of Nonpoint Source Pollution Control in Wisconsin ..................................................... 4 Chapter 2 Monitoring and Assessment ....................................................................................................... 16 Chapter 3 Watershed Planning for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control ...................................................... 30 Chapter 4 Statewide Implementation Program for Protection & Improvement of NPS Impacted Waters .. 57 Chapter 5 Tracking, Evaluation & Reporting............................................................................................... 84 Chapter 6 Future Directions - Through FFY 2020 .................................................................................... 106 2 Wisconsin’s Nonpoint Source Program Management Plan – FFY 2016-2020 Acronyms & Abbreviations Agencies, Departments and Organizations EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency FSA Farm Service Agency (part of USDA) FWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service LCD County Land Conservation Department LWCD County Land and Water Conservation Department
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist for Design Professionals
    Stormwater Management and Sediment and Erosion Control Plan Review Checklist For Design Professionals This Plan Review Checklist for Design Professionals has been developed to aid those who prepare Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plans (SWPPPs). Adjacent to the heading for most sections are references from the corresponding portion of the NPDES General Permit for Stormwater Discharges from Construction Activities (SCR100000), which was issued on October 15, 2012. SWPPP Preparers should not utilize this checklist as a substitute for the language in the permit and should review the permit itself for more information on each specific requirement. The permit may be found at: http://www.scdhec.gov/environment/water/swater/docs/CGP-permit.pdf In the space provided please indicate the location and page number(s) where each item below can be found in your SWPPP or supporting calculations. If an item is not applicable, put N/A. The Department reserves the right to modify this checklist at any time. The Coastal Zone consists of the following counties: Beaufort, Berkeley, Charleston, Colleton, Dorchester, Georgetown, Horry, and Jasper. *Revised Items in Red Project Information: Project Name: County: Checklist Completed by: Printed name: ___________________________ Signature: ___________________________ Date:___________ PLANS AND MAPS 1. CURRENT COMPLETED APPLICATION FORM ● Original Signature of individual with signatory authority for the applicant according to requirements set forth in R.61-9.122.22 (see Appendix C) ● All items completed and answered
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Field Handbook
    Erosion and Sediment Control Field Handbook September 2017 This page intentionally left blank. Chapter 2 – Soil Stabilization Stabilized Construction Entrance 9 Table of Contents Table Stabilized Construction Entrance with Wash Rack 11 Rolled Erosion Control Products – Slope 13 Rolled Erosion Control Products – Channel 14 Vegetative Stabilization N/A 16 Polyacrylamides N/A 20 Chapter 3 – Sediment Barriers and Filters Silt Fence 23 Chapter 3 – Sediment Barriers and Filters Super Silt Fence 26 Filter Sock 29 Straw Bale Dike 32 Standard Inlet Protection 34 At Grade Inlet Protection 36 Table of Contents Table Curb Inlet Protection 37 Standard Inlet Guard 39 Chapter 3 – Sediment Barriers and Filters Stone Check Dam 41 Table of Contents Table Silt Fence on Pavement 43 Chapter 4 – Conveyance Diversion Fence 45 Dike/Swale 47 Earth Dike 49 Temporary Swales 53 Chapter 5 – Water Control Rock Outlet Protection 55 Chapter 6 – Sediment Traps and Basins Sediment Traps 59 Sediment Basins N/A 64 Chapter 7 – Dewatering Table of Contents Table Removable Pumping Station 73 Sump Pit 75 Chapter 7 – Dewatering Portable Sediment Tank 76 Table of Contents Table Pumped Water Filter Bag 78 Chapter 9 – Other Practices Dust Control N/A 79 On-Site Concrete Washout Structure 80 Tree Protection and Preservation 83 This page intentionally left blank. Stabilized Construction Construction Entrance Stabilized 9 Construction Specifications 1. Place the stabilized construction entrance in accordance with the approved plan. Vehicles must travel over the entire length of the SCE. Use a minimum length of 50 feet (30 feet for single-family residence lot) and a minimum width of 10 feet.
    [Show full text]
  • Inspiring Action for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control
    A MANUAL FOR WATER RESOURCE PROTECTION Inspiring Action for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Paul Nelson Scott County, Minnesota Mae A. Davenport Center for Changing Landscapes, University of Minnesota Troy Kuphal Scott Soil and Water Conservation District, Minnesota Inspiring Action for Nonpoint Source Pollution Control: A Manual for Water Resource Protection by Paul Nelson Scott County, Minnesota Mae A. Davenport Center for Changing Landscapes, University of Minnesota Troy Kuphal Scott Soil and Water Conservation District, Minnesota Published by Freshwater Society Saint Paul, Minnesota Acknowledgments Paul Nelson and Troy Kuphal We wish to acknowledge the support of our respective boards — the Scott County Board of Commissioners and the Scott Soil and Water Conservation District Board of Supervisors — and thank them for their will- ingness to let us think and experiment a bit outside the box. We also wish to thank the Scott Watershed Management Organization Watershed Planning Commission members for their support and ongoing advice. In addition, we want to recognize the incredibly talented staff from our two organizations. Their dedication to conservation, building relationships, and delivering excellent service are critical to achieving the accom- plishments detailed in this manual. Their willingness to take, improve, and act on our ideas is inspiring and instrumental to learning and continuous improvement. We also thank our friends at the Board of Soil and Water Resources, the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, the Metropolitan Council, the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, and the Natural Resource Conservation Service for their support in terms of grants, programs, and technical support. Lastly, and most important, we wish to acknowledge the tremendous conservation ethic exhibited by resi- dents in Scott County.
    [Show full text]
  • Sediment Control Measures
    Sediment Control Measures Treat the Problem! Storm Drain Inlet Protection Measures Water Body Protection Measures Down-Slope Protection Measures Stabilized Construction Vehicle Access & Exit Points Dust Generation & Track-Out from Vehicles Soil Stockpiles Non-Storm Water Discharges Sediment Basins Storm Drain Inlet Protection Measures Install appropriate protection measures to minimize the discharge of sediment prior to entry into the inlet Inlet Protection vs. Plow Destruction Habitat Protection? Where’s the Best in this management practice? This is No Place for Sediment to Collect - $$$$$$ What’s in this Storm System? Who’s Cleaning it Out? Protect Inlets Until Final Site Stabilization is Completed! Bylaw 2006 No. 16138 Install and maintain filter fabric bags inside any catch basins, lawn basins, exposed manholes or any other storm sewer access point collecting runoff from the site. Inlet Protection Catch Basin Inserts Maintenance Issues Will Traffic Destroy Your Efforts? Midtown Anchorage Will Your Efforts Destroy Traffic ? Photo Courtesy David Jenkins Storm Drain Inlet Protection • Keeps coarse sediment out of drainage systems • Above ground methods: silt fence, Exert, Dandy Bag • Below ground: catch basin filter BMP WA C-220 OR SC-8 AK - 19 Water Body Protection Measures Install appropriate protection measures to minimize the discharge of sediment prior to entry into the water body. For water bodies located on site or immediately downstream of the site. Tok Turbidity Curtain / Oil Boom • Where intrusion into a watercourse is necessary • Tidal and non-tidal uses • Maximum flow velocity of 5 feet per second • Locate parallel to flow, not across a channel Kotzebue BMP OR RC-10 Columbia River Tidal Influences make maintenance difficult Turbidity / Silt Curtain Ketchikan Down Slope Sediment Controls Gakona Establish and use down-slope sediment controls where storm water will be discharged from disturbed areas of the site.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control During Construction Activities Polk County, Oregon
    Guide to Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control During Construction Activities Polk County, Oregon (Updated May 2009) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Contents 1. Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………... 1 2. Recommended Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Measures……….…………………. 1 2.1. Gravel Construction Entrances………………………………………………………… 2 2.2. Temporary Sediment Fences………………………………………………………….. 5 2.3. Straw Bale Sediment Barrier/Bio-Filter Bags………………………………………... 7 2.4. Undisturbed Vegetative Buffers……………………………………………………... 12 2.5. Temporary Grasses and Permanent Vegetative Cover……………………………….. 12 2.6. Straw Mulch………………………………………………………………………….. 12 2.7. Erosion and Matting Blankets………………………………………………………… 14 2.8. Plastic Sheet Covering……………………………………………………………….. 15 2.9. Storm Drain Inlet Protection…………………………………………………………. 16 3. Post Construction Best Management Practices………………………………………………… 20 4. Contact Information ……………………………………………………………………………20 Erosion Prevention and Sediment Control Polk County, OR 1.0 Introduction This brochure contains erosion prevention techniques and sediment control measures as guidance for construction operators. The focus of this brochure is to first, promote erosion prevention techniques, and second, to promote sediment control measures. Erosion prevention techniques are designed to protect soil particles from the force of rain and wind so that they will not erode. These techniques include such things as ground cover and
    [Show full text]
  • Temporary & Permanent Erosion & Sediment Control Measure
    Module 3: Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control Measures – NDDOT Erosion & Sediment Control – Construction Course NDDOT Erosion & Sediment Control – Construction Course Module 3: Temporary & Permanent Erosion & Sediment Control Measures 1 What’s covered in this module? 1. Definition of temporary erosion and sediment control 2. Physical erosion and sediment control measures 3. Operational erosion and sediment control measures 4. Dewatering and pumping 2 Page 1 Module 3: Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control Measures – NDDOT Erosion & Sediment Control – Construction Course What are the module’s learning objectives? 1. Explain the difference between temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control in the Special Provisions 2. Identify temporary and permanent erosion and sediment control measures and their appropriate applications 3. Evaluate requirements that influence the installation, maintenance, inspection, and removal of erosion and sediment control measures 3 Construction ESC Temporary vs. Permanent What does temporary vs. permanent mean in the Special Provision? What is temporary erosion control? What is temporary sediment control? Are the two mutually exclusive terms? 4 Page 2 Module 3: Temporary Erosion & Sediment Control Measures – NDDOT Erosion & Sediment Control – Construction Course Construction ESC Key Considerations: Installation (constructability) Maintenance QA/QC Inspection Removal 5 Construction ESC Site visits are needed to properly plan the project Critical areas Does the ESC design match what is needed in the
    [Show full text]
  • Best Management Practices to Erosion and Sediment Control On
    Application of Best Management Practices (BPMs) to Erosion and Sediment Control on Alberta Highways (Good and Bad/Failed Installations) BMP GOOD BAD/FAILED BAD/FAILED Energy Dissipator for Culvert Outlet (BMP 17a) H595:02 H986:01 Erosion and undermining of gabion Culvert outlet area with energy Erosion of culvert outlet and structure resulting in collapse and dissipator being protected by removal of large riprap protection scour riprap Rolled Erosion Control Blankets (BMP 13) H43:12 Iosegun River H43:12 Chicadee Creek Installation of gabion basket check Erosion of soil under permanent structure and permanent RECP RECP Gabion Wall (BMP 2) H11:08 Rocky Mountain House H11:08 Rocky Mountain House Rebuilt of failed gabion wall Poor installation of gabion wall resulting in failure Gabion- lined Channel (BMP 2) H63:12 Supertest Hill H986:01 Failed gabion structure Rock size too small resulting in Rebuilt of gabion-lined channel large void Application of Best Management Practices (BPMs) to Erosion and Sediment Control on Alberta Highways (Good and Bad/Failed Installations) BMP GOOD BAD/FAILED BAD/FAILED Slope Tracking (BMP 34) Track-walk up and down slope – H43:10 strongly recommended Slope tracking along slope – not recommended Silt Fence (BMP 1) H43:10 Formation of gullies below silt “Smile” shape fence Silt Fence (BMP 1) “J” hook Silt needs to be removed H43:12 Silt fence not intercepting flow – need repair Rolled Erosion Control Blankets (BMP 13) H16/H21 Interchange Improper blanket installation Installation of straw RECP in ditch Application
    [Show full text]