DOCSLIB.ORG

Wooded Heath Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wooded Heaths in the High Weald A research project to further the understanding of the ecology and management of the woodland / heathland mosaic May 2004 by Theresa Greenaway Survey & Research Officer Record Centre Survey Unit Woods Mill Henfield West Sussex BN5 9SD [email protected] Patrick Roper South View Churchland Lane Sedlescombe East Sussex TN33 0PF [email protected] Kate Ryland Dolphin Ecological Surveys 6a Northfield Cottages Isfield East Sussex TN22 5XN [email protected] 2 CONTENTS Summary ……………………………………………………………. 5 SECTION I. Wooded heaths in the High Weald ……………….. 7 1. Introduction …………………………………………………….. 7 1.1. Background……………………………………………………... 7 1.2. Woodlands or heathlands – a perceived conflict…………… 8 1.3. Aims……………………………………………………………... 9 2. Understanding Wooded Heaths …………………………… 11 2.1. Historical Review………………………………………………. 11 2.1.1. The evolution of heathlands…………………………. 11 2.1.2. Past management of woodlands…………………… 13 2.1.3. Wooded heaths in historical context……………….. 13 2.2. Landscape and recreational value………………………….. 15 2.3. Historical Overview…………………………………………… 16 3. Description and ecological importance of wooded heaths 17 3.1.Woods and Heaths in the High Weald………………………… 17 3.1.1.Woodlands in the High Weald……………………….. 17 3.1.2.Heathlands in the High Weald……………………….. 18 3.2.Ecological description of wooded heaths……………………… 18 3.3.Identification and definition of types of wooded heath………. 19 3.4.Why wooded heaths are ecologically important……………… 20 3.4.1.Biodiversity of wooded heaths……………………….. 20 3.4.2.Indicator species………………………………………. 21 3.4.3.Importance of wooded heaths for invertebrates…… 21 3.4.4.Decline of wooded heath invertebrates…………….. 22 3.4.5.Importance for birds…………………………………… 24 3.5.Current Status and threat ……………………………………… 25 4. Management …………………………………………………… 27 4.1. Owners and managers………………………………………… 27 4.2. Forestry Commission policy…………………………………… 27 4.3. Management options………………………………………….. 30 4.3.1. Site or sub-site scores mostly High restoration potential in site assessment…………………………………… 30 4.3.2. Site or sub-site scores mostly Moderate restoration potential in site assessment………………………… 31 4.3.3. Site or sub-site scores mostly Low restoration potential in site assessment…………………………………… 31 4.4. Economic opportunities……………………………………….. 32 4.5. Management techniques for conservation………………….. 33 4.6. Case studies of two examples of heath/woodheath Management……………………………………………………. 35 4.6.1. Church Wood…………………………………………. 35 4.6.2. Tudeley Wood………………………………………… 36 3 5. Mapping the resources ………………………………………. 39 5.1. Wooded heath in the High Weald…………………………….. 39 6. Discussion ……………………………………………………… 41 6.1. Restoring wooded heaths to the High Weald……………….. 41 6.2. Management appraisal………………………………………… 42 6.2.1.Pros and cons of grazing…………………………….. 43 6.2.2.Pros and cons of coppicing………………………….. 44 6.3. Recommendations to further the understanding of the ecology, management and conservation of High Weald woodheaths.. 45 6.4. In conclusion……………………………………………………. 46 SECTION II. Wooded heath Survey and Assessment Protocol 49 Acknowledgments …………………………………………………. 63 References …………………………………………………………... 65 Appendices ………………………………………………………….. 69 4 SUMMARY This project is aimed at raising the profile of wooded heaths in the High Weald, although the information contained in it is relevant to all heathy areas in southern England. Many of the sites considered to be lost heathland are also mapped as semi-natural ancient woodland, and separating which sites are historically heath and which are historically woodland has caused problems. The existing programmes aimed at restoring either heathland or semi-natural woodland have not addressed adequately the fact that there is a spectrum of biotopes between ‘heathland’ and ‘woodland’. The Weald Heathland Initiative is seeking guidelines that will establish wooded heaths as an integral component of both heathland and woodland. This will assist management, contribute to targets for restoration and which will also be compatible with the economic targets of Forest Enterprise. In order to achieve the aims of this project, the Record Centre Survey Unit has commissioned and collated a desk study of the history, ecology and cultural importance of wooded heaths, a protocol for the survey and assessment of wooded heaths and the digitisation of historical maps of the area on ArcView Geographical Information System, linking these with aerial maps. The information thus gathered has been presented in a report consisting of three Sections: Section I. Wooded Heaths in the High Weald Section II. Wooded heath Survey and Assessment Protocol Section III. Mapping High Weald Wooded Heaths, Past and Present (Submitted separately ) It is hoped that this work will contribute to ensuring that wooded heaths acquire a status equal to that of open heath and ancient woodland, and that the conservation of the entire heath / wooded heath / woodland continuum will be seen to be the responsibility of heathland and woodland managers. An appropriate management strategy should help to achieve this, and will reconcile perceived conflicts of interests between heathland and woodland conservation, and facilitate the conservation of all these habitats in the High Weald area. 5 6 SECTION I WOODED HEATHS IN THE HIGH WEALD 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. Background The High Weald Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONB) is an area of 1,450 square kilometres lying within the High Weald Natural Area (Patmore, 1997). It was designated as an AONB by the government in 1983 to conserve and enhance the natural beauty of this historic countryside of rolling hills and deeply cut valleys draped by small, irregular fields, abundant woods and hedges, scattered villages and farmsteads and sunken lanes. Broadleaved woodland is the predominant land cover in the High Weald, some areas of which are on the provisional Ancient Woodland Inventory which is administered by English Nature (EN). Heathlands occur along the wooded ridges of the High Weald and additionally, heathy habitats can be found within semi-natural ancient woodlands, where they may once have been managed under a pasture woodland management system. These ‘wooded heaths’ or ‘heathy woods’ are an important element of the High Weald biotope mosaic. In the 20 th Century, intensive agriculture, forestry plantations, house and road building have destroyed both semi-natural broadleaved woodland and heathland. Some 50% of the Weald’s open heathland is estimated to have been lost since the beginning of the 19 th Century (Sussex Biodiversity Partnership, 1998), a loss which elevates the national importance of the remaining areas. The 1992 Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro resulted in the endorsement of the Convention of Biological Diversity, which in the UK led to the production of the National Biodiversity Action Plan. Priority Habitats, including both broadleaved woodland and heathland, were the subject of both National and Local Habitat Action Plans (HAPs), one feature of which was the setting of measurable targets aimed at their conservation and restoration. In order to achieve these targets for the Lowland Heathland HAP, EN set up Tomorrow’s Heathland Heritage , a national umbrella project funded by the Heritage Lottery Fund. This project aims to restore 58,000 ha and to recreate 6000 ha of lowland heath in the UK by 2005. The Weald Heathland Initiative Project operates within Tomorrow’s Heathland Heritage , and is a five-year programme of work established by a partnership between the High Weald AONB Unit, English Nature, East Sussex County Council, West Sussex County Council, Kent High Weald Project, Ashdown Forest Conservators, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and the Department of Farming and Rural Affairs. Heathland restoration work is being carried out on a target 1500ha in the Weald and includes scrub clearance, bracken control, heather cutting and fencing, with the introduction of grazing in some areas to achieve sustainable, long-term management. The Sussex Lowland Heathland HAP has as one of its targets the recreation of at least 800 ha of heathland from forestry or other land by 2010, where possible linking together or enlarging existing sites (Sussex Biodiversity Partnership, 1998). The Sussex Woodland HAP has comparable targets, one 7 of which is the restoration of 10% of planted ancient woodland to semi-natural woodland (Sussex Biodiversity Partnership, 2000). Land ownership and existing land management are likely to be important factors in setting and achieving targets identified in both HAPs The strategy under which the Forestry Commission (FC) operates has changed from promoting policies aimed solely at commercial timber production to those aimed at promoting rural development, recreation, tourism, the environment and conservation (Forestry Commission, undated) alongside the more traditional economic objectives. Indeed, the UK Woodland Assurance Scheme (UKWAS) stipulates the full or partial restoration of Plantations on Ancient Woodland Sites (Spencer, 2002). 1.2. Woodlands or heathlands – a perceived conflict The sum result of these initiatives is a drive to conserve, restore and recreate areas of both broadleaved woodland and heathland in the High Weald. Forest Enterprise (FE), as one of the participants in these initiatives, has also to encompass an economic aspect, as some of the areas likely to have restoration potential to either semi-natural woodland or heathland is currently under forestry plantation. On some sites,
Recommended publications
  • Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions

    Fauna Lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 Years Later: Changes and Additions

    ©Ges. zur Förderung d. Erforschung von Insektenwanderungen e.V. München, download unter www.zobodat.at Atalanta (August 2000) 31 (1/2):327-367< Würzburg, ISSN 0171-0079 "Fauna lepidopterologica Volgo-Uralensis" 150 years later: changes and additions. Part 5. Noctuidae (Insecto, Lepidoptera) by Vasily V. A n ik in , Sergey A. Sachkov , Va d im V. Z o lo t u h in & A n drey V. Sv ir id o v received 24.II.2000 Summary: 630 species of the Noctuidae are listed for the modern Volgo-Ural fauna. 2 species [Mesapamea hedeni Graeser and Amphidrina amurensis Staudinger ) are noted from Europe for the first time and one more— Nycteola siculana Fuchs —from Russia. 3 species ( Catocala optata Godart , Helicoverpa obsoleta Fabricius , Pseudohadena minuta Pungeler ) are deleted from the list. Supposedly they were either erroneously determinated or incorrect noted from the region under consideration since Eversmann 's work. 289 species are recorded from the re­ gion in addition to Eversmann 's list. This paper is the fifth in a series of publications1 dealing with the composition of the pres­ ent-day fauna of noctuid-moths in the Middle Volga and the south-western Cisurals. This re­ gion comprises the administrative divisions of the Astrakhan, Volgograd, Saratov, Samara, Uljanovsk, Orenburg, Uralsk and Atyraus (= Gurjev) Districts, together with Tataria and Bash­ kiria. As was accepted in the first part of this series, only material reliably labelled, and cover­ ing the last 20 years was used for this study. The main collections are those of the authors: V. A n i k i n (Saratov and Volgograd Districts), S.
  • Methods and Work Profile

    Methods and Work Profile

    REVIEW OF THE KNOWN AND POTENTIAL BIODIVERSITY IMPACTS OF PHYTOPHTHORA AND THE LIKELY IMPACT ON ECOSYSTEM SERVICES JANUARY 2011 Simon Conyers Kate Somerwill Carmel Ramwell John Hughes Ruth Laybourn Naomi Jones Food and Environment Research Agency Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................... 8 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 13 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................................ 13 1.2 Objectives .......................................................................................................................... 15 2. Review of the potential impacts on species of higher trophic groups .................... 16 2.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 16 2.2 Methods ............................................................................................................................. 16 2.3 Results ............................................................................................................................... 17 2.4 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 44 3. Review of the potential impacts on ecosystem services .......................................
  • SUSSEX MOTH GROUP NEWSLETTER Page 28 SUSSEX MOTH GROUP NEWSLETTER March 2009 Notice Regarding Elections at the AGM by Clare Jeffers on Behalf of the Committee

    SUSSEX MOTH GROUP NEWSLETTER Page 28 SUSSEX MOTH GROUP NEWSLETTER March 2009 Notice Regarding Elections at the AGM by Clare Jeffers on Behalf of the Committee

    SUSSEX MOTH GROUP NEWSLETTER Page 28 SUSSEX MOTH GROUP NEWSLETTER March 2009 Notice regarding Elections at the AGM by Clare Jeffers on behalf of the committee At the indoor meeting last November the Sussex Moth Group committee talked about a proposal for formalising the election of committee members. The idea was that any committee member planning to stand down from their position should ideally make this known well in advance of the AGM, so that any upcoming 'vacancy' can be advertised to all our members in the Autumn news- letter and/or at the Winter indoor meeting. The committee supposed that advertising vacancies in this manner would give all members an equal opportunity to put themselves forward for a position on the committee and the committee proposed that, in the interests of fairness, elections would then be carried out by secret ballot - either by placing ballot papers in a box at the AGM, or by B l 'postal vote' in sealed envelope to the secretary. As it happens, our current Chairman, Sam Bayley, o x w announced at that meeting his intention to stand down at the next AGM and this fact was made o r t known to all members through the distribution of minutes from that meeting; any members willing h S to take on the position of Chairman were invited to put themselves forward. n o u t b The situation we find ourselves in now is that only one member, Steve Teale, has put themselves y G r forward for the Chairman's position and no one has expressed an interest in taking over any of the a e other positions on the committee; it therefore seems that the committee's original proposal to m e elect the officers of the committee by ballot is impractical.
  • Metapopulation Dynamics of a Perennial Plant, Succisa Pratensis, in an Agricultural Landscape

    Metapopulation Dynamics of a Perennial Plant, Succisa Pratensis, in an Agricultural Landscape

    ecological modelling 199 (2006) 464–475 available at www.sciencedirect.com journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolmodel Metapopulation dynamics of a perennial plant, Succisa pratensis, in an agricultural landscape Mikael Milden´ a,∗, Zuzana Munzbergov¨ a´ b,c,Toma´ sˇ Herben b,c, Johan Ehrlen´ a a Department of Botany, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden b Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43 Pruhonice,˚ Czech Republic c Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Charles University, Benatsk´ a,´ CZ-128 01 Praha, Czech Republic article info abstract Article history: Most metapopulation models neglect the local dynamics, and systems characterized by Published on line 1 August 2006 slow population turnover, time lags and non-equilibrium, are only rarely examined within a metapopulation context. In this study we used a realistic, spatially explicit, dynamic Keywords: metapopulation model of a long-lived grassland plant, Succisa pratensis, to examine the rel- Demography ative importance of local population dynamics, and short and long-distance dispersal of Dynamic metapopulation models seeds. Habitat suitability assessment Using both vegetation composition and sowing experiments we identified 94 occupied Long-distance dispersal and 43 unoccupied, but suitable, habitat patches in a 7-km2 landscape. Local population Non-equilibrium metapopulations dynamics were studied in permanent plots in five populations. Simulation results showed Sensitivity analysis that the colonization and extinction dynamics of S. pratensis were slow with about one col- Time lags onization or extinction per year and the time frame for the population system to attain equilibrium in a constant landscape was several thousands of years.
  • David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 Clements-D@Dce.Org.Uk DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD

    David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD

    DDAAVVIIDD CCLLEEMMEENNTTSS EECCOOLLOOGGYY LLTTDD MERTHYR TYDFIL COUNTY BOROUGH SITES OF IMPORTANCE FOR NATURE CONSERVATION SO 00SW/2: RHYDYCAR WEST SURVEY & ASSESSMENT FOR SINC DESIGNATION May 2006 David Clements Ecology Ltd Carlton House, 5 Herbert Terrace, Penarth, Glamorgan, CF64 2AH Tel/Fax: 029 20 350120 [email protected] DAVID CLEMENTS ECOLOGY LTD Site Name: RHYDYCAR WEST Grid Ref(s): SO 045047 Site No.: SO 00SW/2 SO 033050 (W); 038053 (N); 053036 (E); 034031 (S) Status: Candidate Date: July 2002 July 2002: Provisional site; boundary identified from available Proposed Date: desk-top sources only; requires confirmation by survey. Confirmed Date: Dec 2005: Site surveyed and assessed for designation; designation boundary identified. Summary - Reasons for Selection/Interest of Site: Very extensive mosaic of ‘ffridd’ habitats and former mine spoil supporting complex of semi- upland and lowland habitats, partly contained within conifer plantation. Main components are ancient semi-natural woodland fragments, other semi-natural woodlands (mainly upland oak, Quercus sp) together with wet woodlands of alder (Alnus glutinosa), wet heathland, dry heathland, marshy grassland and semi-improved neutral grasslands. Also there are some bracken slopes, scrub, small ponds, streams and sections of dismantled railway. There are areas of semi- improved acid grasslands to the south especially. The habitats intergrade to form a complex mosaic, and may therefore also include some small areas of improved or low diversity semi- improved grassland, but any such areas are a very minor component. Great crested newt occurs in small pools within the SINC, and noctule and pipistrelle bats have both been recorded. Water vole may occur and a small badger sett is present.
  • Lowland Heathland 2016.Pdf

    Lowland Heathland 2016.Pdf

    www.warwickshirewildlifetrust.org.uk ACTION for WILDLIFE Warwickshire, Coventry and Solihull Local Biodiversity Action Plan REVISED PLAN FEBRUARY 2016 LOWLAND HEATHLAND 1. INTRODUCTION Lowland heathland is typified by the presence of heather (Calluna vulgaris), dwarf gorse (Ulex minor) and cross-leaved heath (Erica tetralix) and is generally found below 300 metres in altitude on poor acid soils. Areas of good quality heathland should consist of an ericaceous layer of varying heights and structures, some areas of scattered trees and scrub, and areas of bare ground, gorse, wet heaths, bogs and open water. Heathland at Grendon Lowland heathland is a priority for nature conservation because it is a © Steven Cheshire rare and threatened habitat. Areas of heathland in good condition should consist of an ericaceous layer of varying heights and structures, plus some or all of the following additional features, depending on environmental and/or management conditions: scattered and clumped trees and scrub; bracken; areas of bare ground and acid grassland; lichens; gorse; wet heaths, bogs and open waters (JNCC, 2008). The following moths are useful indicators for assessing the quality of heathland habitat: Aristotelia ericinella (Micro), Narrow-winged Pug (Eupithecia nanata), True Lovers’ Knot (Lycophotia porphyria), Heath Rustic (Xestia agathina agathina) and Beautiful Yellow Underwing (Anarta myrtilli ( the latter known only from Grendon Common and Sutton Park, K.Warmington, 2015). 2. OBJECTIVES * TARGETS* Associated Action Plans are: ‘Lowland Acid Grassland’, ‘Bats’, ‘Adder’, ‘Dingy Skipper’, ‘Argent & Sable’ and ‘Rare Bumblebees’ PLEASE CONSULT THE ‘GENERIC HABITATS’ ACTION PLAN IN CONJUNCTION WITH THIS DOCUMENT FOR OBJECTIVES COMMON TO ALL HABITAT PLANS A. To achieve condition of 6ha of existing lowland heathland 2026 above 0.25ha that are currently in unfavourable condition, to favourable or recovering, giving priority to those holding UK Biodiversity Action Plan Priority Species & Red Data Book species B.
  • The Mcguire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity

    The Mcguire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity

    Supplemental Information All specimens used within this study are housed in: the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity (MGCL) at the Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, USA (FLMNH); the University of Maryland, College Park, USA (UMD); the Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle in Paris, France (MNHN); and the Australian National Insect Collection in Canberra, Australia (ANIC). Methods DNA extraction protocol of dried museum specimens (detailed instructions) Prior to tissue sampling, dried (pinned or papered) specimens were assigned MGCL barcodes, photographed, and their labels digitized. Abdomens were then removed using sterile forceps, cleaned with 100% ethanol between each sample, and the remaining specimens were returned to their respective trays within the MGCL collections. Abdomens were placed in 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tubes with the apex of the abdomen in the conical end of the tube. For larger abdomens, 5 mL microcentrifuge tubes or larger were utilized. A solution of proteinase K (Qiagen Cat #19133) and genomic lysis buffer (OmniPrep Genomic DNA Extraction Kit) in a 1:50 ratio was added to each abdomen containing tube, sufficient to cover the abdomen (typically either 300 µL or 500 µL) - similar to the concept used in Hundsdoerfer & Kitching (1). Ratios of 1:10 and 1:25 were utilized for low quality or rare specimens. Low quality specimens were defined as having little visible tissue inside of the abdomen, mold/fungi growth, or smell of bacterial decay. Samples were incubated overnight (12-18 hours) in a dry air oven at 56°C. Importantly, we also adjusted the ratio depending on the tissue type, i.e., increasing the ratio for particularly large or egg-containing abdomens.
  • Capel Court Farm Capel, Kent TN12 6SU Capel Court Farm

    Capel Court Farm Capel, Kent TN12 6SU Capel Court Farm

    Capel Court Farm Capel, Kent TN12 6SU Capel Court Farm ALDERS ROAD, FIVE OAK GREEN, TONBRIDGE, KENT TN12 6SU An immaculately presented and stylishly developed family home, conveniently situated in a rural hamlet between Matfield, Tonbridge and Tunbridge Wells Ground Floor entrance hall, kitchen/breakfast room, sitting/dining room, drawing room family room, study, utility room, cloakroom First Floor master bedroom with en suite bathroom, four further bedrooms family bathroom, shower room Outside oak-framed outbuilding comprising 2-bay open garage, garden store and studio with kitchenette and shower room, front garden, extensive gravelled driveway and parking, south facing patio, rear garden, paddocks extending to 4.8 acres (total land area) EPC = D DESCRIPTION Capel Court Farm occupies a delightful setting with the house, originally believed to be a farmhouse, positioned at the heart of its immediate grounds. With lawns, a small orchard and a pond to the front, and a wonderful south facing terrace and lawn to the rear, the feeling of openness and space is further enhanced by the gentle uphill view beyond the post-and-rail chestnut fence and over the paddocks. This family home has been thoughtfully and stylishly extended by the present owners to create a contemporary layout with an open- plan feel while retaining the charm and showcasing the historical elements of the building’s heritage. Making full use of the southerly rear elevation, the spacious kitchen and principal reception rooms feature bi-fold doors opening out onto the Yorkstone terrace, flooding these areas with light year-round, and bringing house and garden together during the warmer months.
  • Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone

    Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and Its Buffer Zone

    Fr a g m e n t a Fa u n ist ic a 51 (2): 107-118, 2008 PL ISSN 0015-9301 O M u seu m a n d I n s t i t u t e o f Z o o l o g y PAS Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) of the Kampinos National Park and its buffer zone Izabela DZIEKAŃSKA* and M arcin SlELEZNlEW** * Department o f Applied Entomology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776, Warszawa, Poland; e-mail: e-mail: [email protected] **Department o f Invertebrate Zoology, Institute o f Biology, University o f Białystok, Świerkowa 2OB, 15-950 Białystok, Poland; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract: Kampinos National Park is the second largest protected area in Poland and therefore a potentially important stronghold for biodiversity in the Mazovia region. However it has been abandoned as an area of lepidopterological studies for a long time. A total number of 80 butterfly species were recorded during inventory studies (2005-2008), which proved the occurrence of 80 species (81.6% of species recorded in the Mazovia voivodeship and about half of Polish fauna), including 7 from the European Red Data Book and 15 from the national red list (8 protected by law). Several xerothermophilous species have probably become extinct in the last few decadesColias ( myrmidone, Pseudophilotes vicrama, Melitaea aurelia, Hipparchia statilinus, H. alcyone), or are endangered in the KNP and in the region (e.g. Maculinea arion, Melitaea didyma), due to afforestation and spontaneous succession. Higrophilous butterflies have generally suffered less from recent changes in land use, but action to stop the deterioration of their habitats is urgently needed.
  • Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And

    Contribution to the Knowledge of the Fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges And

    driemaandelijks tijdschrift van de VLAAMSE VERENIGING VOOR ENTOMOLOGIE Afgiftekantoor 2170 Merksem 1 ISSN 0771-5277 Periode: oktober – november – december 2002 Erkenningsnr. P209674 Redactie: Dr. J–P. Borie (Compiègne, France), Dr. L. De Bruyn (Antwerpen), T. C. Garrevoet (Antwerpen), B. Goater (Chandlers Ford, England), Dr. K. Maes (Gent), Dr. K. Martens (Brussel), H. van Oorschot (Amsterdam), D. van der Poorten (Antwerpen), W. O. De Prins (Antwerpen). Redactie-adres: W. O. De Prins, Nieuwe Donk 50, B-2100 Antwerpen (Belgium). e-mail: [email protected]. Jaargang 30, nummer 4 1 december 2002 Contribution to the knowledge of the fauna of Bombyces, Sphinges and Noctuidae of the Southern Ural Mountains, with description of a new Dichagyris (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae, Arctiidae) Kari Nupponen & Michael Fibiger [In co-operation with Vladimir Olschwang, Timo Nupponen, Jari Junnilainen, Matti Ahola and Jari- Pekka Kaitila] Abstract. The list, comprising 624 species in the families Lasiocampidae, Endromidae, Saturniidae, Sphingidae, Notodontidae, Noctuidae, Pantheidae, Lymantriidae, Nolidae and Arctiidae from the Southern Ural Mountains is presented. The material was collected during 1996–2001 in 10 different expeditions. Dichagyris lux Fibiger & K. Nupponen sp. n. is described. 17 species are reported for the first time from Europe: Clostera albosigma (Fitch, 1855), Xylomoia retinax Mikkola, 1998, Ecbolemia misella (Püngeler, 1907), Pseudohadena stenoptera Boursin, 1970, Hadula nupponenorum Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Saragossa uralica Hacker & Fibiger, 2002, Conisania arida (Lederer, 1855), Polia malchani (Draudt, 1934), Polia vespertilio (Draudt, 1934), Polia altaica (Lederer, 1853), Mythimna opaca (Staudinger, 1899), Chersotis stridula (Hampson, 1903), Xestia wockei (Möschler, 1862), Euxoa dsheiron Brandt, 1938, Agrotis murinoides Poole, 1989, Agrotis sp.
  • Kentish Weald

    Kentish Weald

    LITTLE CHART PLUCKLEY BRENCHLEY 1639 1626 240 ACRES (ADDITIONS OF /763,1767 680 ACRES 8 /798 OMITTED) APPLEDORE 1628 556 ACRES FIELD PATTERNS IN THE KENTISH WEALD UI LC u nmappad HORSMONDEN. NORTH LAMBERHURST AND WEST GOUDHURST 1675 1175 ACRES SUTTON VALENCE 119 ACRES c1650 WEST PECKHAM &HADLOW 1621 c400 ACRES • F. II. 'educed from orivinals on va-i us scalP5( 7 k0. U 1I IP 3;17 1('r 2; U I2r/P 42*U T 1C/P I;U 27VP 1; 1 /7p T ) . mhe form-1 re re cc&— t'on of woodl and blockc ha c been sta dardised;the trees alotw the field marr'ns hie been exactly conieda-3 on the 7o-cc..onen mar ar mar1n'ts;(1) on Vh c. c'utton vPlence map is a divided fi cld cP11 (-1 in thP ace unt 'five pieces of 1Pnii. THE WALDEN LANDSCAPE IN THE EARLY SEVENTEENTH CENTERS AND ITS ANTECELENTS Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the University of London by John Louis Mnkk Gulley 1960 ABSTRACT This study attempts to describe the historical geography of a confined region, the Weald, before 1650 on the basis of factual research; it is also a methodological experiment, since the results are organised in a consistently retrospective sequence. After defining the region and surveying its regional geography at the beginning of the seventeenth century, the antecedents and origins of various elements in the landscape-woodlands, parks, settlement and field patterns, industry and towns - are sought by retrospective enquiry. At two stages in this sequence the regional geography at a particular period (the early fourteenth century, 1086) is , outlined, so that the interconnections between the different elements in the region should not be forgotten.
  • Noctuidos Heliófilos De Galicia (España) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

    Noctuidos Heliófilos De Galicia (España) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

    Boletín de la Sociedad Entomológica Aragonesa (S.E.A.), nº 48 (30/06/2011): 417‒423. NOCTUIDOS HELIÓFILOS DE GALICIA (ESPAÑA) (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE) Eliseo H. Fernández Vidal Plaza de Zalaeta, 2-5ºA, 15002 A Coruña (España) – [email protected] Resumen: Presentamos listados comentados de los Noctuidae heliófilos que hemos observado en Galicia (España) a lo largo de las últimas tres décadas. Se incluyen algunas primeras citas para esta región o para alguna de sus provincias. Palabras clave: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae heliófilos, nuevas citas, Galicia, España. Heliophilous noctuids from Galicia (Spain) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Abstract: We present annotated lists of the heliophilous Noctuidae that we have observed in Galicia (Spain) along the last ones three decades. Several first records for this region or someone of his provinces are included as well. Key words: Lepidoptera, heliophilous Noctuidae, new records, Galicia, Spain. Introducción Es sobradamente conocido que los imagines de muchas espe- 3. Especies de actividad nocturna frecuentemente heliófilas: cies, incluso de géneros enteros, pertenecientes a Noctuidae, las de hábitos normalmente nocturnos, más o menos lucí- a despecho de lo que tal nombre taxonómico familiar indica, petas, con grado medio/alto de actividad heliófila aunque tienen hábitos diurnos. Un intento de clasificación de las muy variable y probablemente derivado de causas y/o cir- especies ibéricas con tales hábitos se esboza en Gómez Bus- cunstancias diversas, sólo comunes a algunas de ellas. tillo et al. (1974: 74). Advirtiéndose que no se trata de listados 4. Especies de actividad diurna estrictamente heliófilas: las exhaustivos, que sólo reflejan la experiencia de campo de los que nunca hemos observado manteniendo tipo alguno de autores y otras matizaciones, se establecen dos grupos: actividad nocturna.