DOCSLIB.ORG

House of Lords Official Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
House of Lords Official Report Vol. 795 Monday No. 239 21 January 2019 PARLIAMENTARYDEBATES (HANSARD) HOUSE OF LORDS OFFICIAL REPORT ORDEROFBUSINESS Questions Television Licences: Over 75s .........................................................................................493 Health: Chief Medical Officer’s Recommendations .......................................................495 Education: English Baccalaureate ..................................................................................498 Brexit: Cross-Channel Transport....................................................................................500 Zimbabwe Private Notice Question ..................................................................................................502 Trade Bill Committee (1st Day)......................................................................................................506 Leaving the European Union Statement........................................................................................................................557 Poverty: Metrics Question for Short Debate...............................................................................................573 Trade Bill Committee (1st Day) (Continued) ................................................................................589 Lords wishing to be supplied with these Daily Reports should give notice to this effect to the Printed Paper Office. No proofs of Daily Reports are provided. Corrections for the bound volume which Lords wish to suggest to the report of their speeches should be clearly indicated in a copy of the Daily Report, which, with the column numbers concerned shown on the front cover, should be sent to the Editor of Debates, House of Lords, within 14 days of the date of the Daily Report. This issue of the Official Report is also available on the Internet at https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2019-01-21 The first time a Member speaks to a new piece of parliamentary business, the following abbreviations are used to show their party affiliation: Abbreviation Party/Group CB Cross Bench Con Conservative DUP Democratic Unionist Party GP Green Party Ind Lab Independent Labour Ind LD Independent Liberal Democrat Ind SD Independent Social Democrat Ind UU Independent Ulster Unionist Lab Labour Lab Co-op Labour and Co-operative Party LD Liberal Democrat LD Ind Liberal Democrat Independent Non-afl Non-affiliated PC Plaid Cymru UKIP UK Independence Party UUP Ulster Unionist Party No party affiliation is given for Members serving the House in a formal capacity, the Lords spiritual, Members on leave of absence or Members who are otherwise disqualified from sitting in the House. © Parliamentary Copyright House of Lords 2019, this publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 493 Television Licences: Over 75s[21 JANUARY 2019] Television Licences: Over 75s 494 House of Lords runs out in 2020. If, as the Minister wishes, the BBC does continue to offer this arrangement, who is going Monday 21 January 2019 to pay for it? 2.30 pm Lord Ashton of Hyde: When the funding settlement Prayers—read by the Lord Bishop of Worcester. was put down in 2015, the BBC agreed to pay for it in 2020, in return for a five-year,index-linked settlement—the first time that had ever happened. The BBC has had Television Licences: Over 75s four years to prepare for this; it knew it was coming. Question That is why we expect it to live up to what was agreed. 2.36 pm Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury (LD): If the Asked by Lord Naseby Government persist in requiring the BBC, and hence Toask Her Majesty’sGovernment what discussions the licence fee payer, to pay for the over-75s—a welfare they have held with the BBC about ending free benefit introduced by Gordon Brown and paid for by television licences for those over 75 years old. the Government—there will either have to be yet more cuts to its budget, and consequently to UK content at Lord Naseby (Con): My Lords, I beg leave to ask a time when PSBs are really under the cosh, or a rise in the Question standing in my name on the Order Paper. the licence fee which will have particular implications In doing so, I declare that I am over 75. for lower-income households. Does the Minister agree? TheParliamentaryUnder-Secretaryof State,Department Lord Ashton of Hyde: The BBC is consulting on a for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport (Lord Ashton of number of options, it has made those known and the Hyde) (Con): My Lords, the Government meet the consultation finishes next month—I am sure that noble BBC regularly to discuss a range of issues, including Lords will want to contribute to it. The fact is that the the over-75s concession. We know that people across BBC agreed a deal in 2015. We are not asking anything the country value television as a way to stay connected sudden; it has had four years to prepare for this and with the world, and that is why the Government have that is what they agreed to do. So I do not see why it is guaranteed the concession until 2020. We have agreed extraordinary to expect the BBC, a £5 billion corporation, with the BBC that responsibility for the concession to live up to the agreement it made in 2015. will transfer to the BBC in 2020, and we have been clear that we want the concession to continue. Baroness Deech (CB): Does the Minister agree that Lord Naseby: Is my noble friend aware that that is the BBC would have plenty of scope to meet this cost an encouraging Answer? Nevertheless, is it not time if it slashed the exorbitant salaries paid to some performers that the BBC faced up to the fact that it is a public and producers, not to mention their bonuses? service broadcaster, with a social responsibility to its listeners? Is it not a little surprising to have a consultation Lord Ashton of Hyde: Would that that were so. I document of 50 pages-plus on the subject which seems agree with the thrust of the noble Baroness’squestion—the to give the message that it is trying to wriggle out of BBC has a duty to take seriously how much it pays that social responsibility? When it faced a not dissimilar senior managers and stars—but the cost of the over-75s’ problem for BBC overseas, when the Foreign Office concession is about £750 million, and I am afraid that removed the grant, the BBC took the decision to take even reducing all salaries to zero would not achieve advertising. We now have a situation where every hour that. of BBC broadcasting has three minutes of promos. Would that gap not be better used by taking advertising? Lord Dubs (Lab): My Lords, is it not true that the BBC was pretty well bounced into this? It was a Lord Ashton of Hyde: My noble friend is completely decision made by the Treasury and not even DCMS right that the BBC should pay attention to its social knew about it until the BBC was forced to comply. responsibilities, and it does. However,in the consultation surrounding the renewal of the royal charter, only 1.5% of people said that the BBC should have advertising. Lord Ashton of Hyde: If that was the case, why did One of the reasons why allowing it would not be the director-general say: an easy solution is that all the other public service “The government’s decision here to put the cost of the over-75s broadcasters, which do not start the year with £3.8 billion on us has been more than matched by the deal coming back for in subsidy, would find it even more difficult to do their the BBC”? excellent job. Lord Wallace of Saltaire (LD): My Lords, following Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Lab): My Lords, the principle of the noble Lord, Lord Naseby, that going back to the main point, this is a completely public service functions could be subsidised by advertising, classic cock-up by the Conservative Party. It promised, are there thoughts within the Conservative Government in its manifesto, that this issue would continue until that this principle could be extended further? Our the end of the next Parliament—which I still think is police service has been quite sharply cut in recent 2022—but the new arrangements are supposed to take years, for example. Does the Minister think that police place from 2020. To compound the issue, the money cars could be encouraged to take advertising as well? 495 Television Licences: Over 75s[LORDS] Health: CMO’s Recommendations 496 Lord Ashton of Hyde: I do not know whether the BaronessManzoor:MyLords,asIsaid,theGovernment noble Lord was listening to the Answer I gave to my take very seriously the CMO’s recommendations and noble friend. I said that the BBC should not take in previous years have taken them on board. The advertising. Government are striving to address the inequalities, and, as we said in the Statement on the NHS plan, Baroness McIntosh of Hudnall (Lab): My Lords, £4.5 billion is going into the preventive agenda through following on from the question asked by my noble increased investment in primary medical and community friend Lord Dubs, does the Minister agree, on reflection, care. We are addressing inequalities in obesity and are that the way the agreement—which we all have to looking to reduce by 2030 the gap in obesity between concede was an agreement—was arrived at was, to say children from the most and least deprived areas. the least, not very transparent and did not take very long to be sorted out? It appeared to come upon Lord O’Shaughnessy (Con): My Lords, one of the everybody very suddenly and without much discussion, best ways to reduce health inequalities is to make which suggests a bit of a shotgun arrangement. sure that we have truly personalised medicine—which the CMO references in her report. She talks about Lord Ashton of Hyde: The BBC is not a small health being transformed by 2040 by integrating organisation; it is a very sophisticated organisation. biomedicine, technology and behavioural sciences. Up until the 2015 settlement, there was an almost Can my noble friend say what the NHS is doing to permanent state of crisis because the licence fee was embrace the innovations that will lead to this kind of funded on an annual basis, so as soon as it was agreed healthcare? one year, negotiations started for the next year.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Churchill Activities B1
    Churchill Activities B1 Pre-reading Activities Activity A. 1. Find the odd man out. In each list, circle the name of the person who is different. a. George Washington l Abraham Lincoln l Franklin D. Roosevelt l Jack London l George Bush l Barack Obama b. Benedict Cumberbatch l Emma Watson l Daniel Craig l Daniel Radcliffe l Keira Knightley l Elvis Presley c. Margaret Thatcher l John Lennon l Neville Chamberlain l Tony Blair l Theresa May l David Cameron d. James Dean l Scarlett Johannsson l Denzel Washington l Marilyn Monroe l Beyoncé l Leonardo Di Caprio 2. Choose a title for each list British Kings l American singers l British Prime Ministers l American actors British writers l American Presidents l American poets l British actors. a. ___________________________________________________________________________________ b. ___________________________________________________________________________________ c. ___________________________________________________________________________________ d. ___________________________________________________________________________________ www.speakeasy-news.com - January 2018 B1 Churchill |1| 3. This man is Winston Churchill. Which category from A.2. does he belong to? ___________________________________ 4. Now write a sentence. To choose the tense you have to know if he is dead or alive. To find the information log onto http://www.bbc.co.uk/schools/primaryhistory/famouspeople/winston_churchill a. Which information helped you? ______________________________________________________________ b. So, which
    [Show full text]
  • Theresa May's New Third Way | the Spectator
    Theresa Mayʼs new third way | The Spectator 10/25/18, 1251 PM Theresa May's new third way The Prime Minister is trying to steer a path between globalism and nationalism James Forsyth Forget left and right — the new divide in politics is between nationalists and globalists. Donald Trump’s team believe that he won because he was the America First candidate, defying the old rules of politics. His nationalist rhetoric on everything from trade to global security enabled him to flip traditionally Democratic, blue-collar states and so to defeat that personification of the post-war global order, Hillary Clinton. The presidential election in France is being fought on these lines, too. Marine Le Pen is the nationalist candidate, a hybrid of the hard right and the far left. She talks of quitting https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/02/theresa-mays-new-third-way/ Page 1 of 7 Theresa Mayʼs new third way | The Spectator 10/25/18, 1251 PM the European single currency and of bringing immigration down to 10,000 a year, while cursing international capitalism with an almost socialist fervour. Her likely second round opponent, the ex-finance minister Emmanuel Macron (profiled on p. 12), is the globalist candidate: a former Rothschild banker who believes in a eurozone budget, the Schengen borderless area and the need for France to deregulate. James Forsyth and Fraser Nelson discuss the new Third Way: Theresa May’s strategy is designed for a nationalist vs globalist era. Her response isn’t to embrace either extreme, but to try to chart a third way between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Governmental Responses to the Riots
    placing such funding as remains in the hands of elected Police and Governmental responses Crime Commissioners (PCCs) to do with as they, or their political to the riots constituency, sees fit. But if the voters are not too worried about gangs, Harry Angel discusses the government’s because their violence is confined to a handful of down-at-heel housing main policy strategy to date estates, but want to see ‘travellers’ evicted from a local beauty spot, localism will trump the government’s gang strategy. ovember 2011 saw the clear that: publication of Ending Gang It’s a family affair Nand Youth Violence: A Across the ten forces where the Unsurprisingly, given the ideological Cross-Government Report (HM disorder was most prevalent persuasion of the Conservative-led Government, 2011). This document a total of 417 arrestees during Coalition, the punchline of Ending is based, in part, upon the the period of the disorder were Gang and Youth Violence is ‘the deliberations of a rapidly convened reported to be affiliated to a family’. To oversimplify, but only International Forum on Gangs gang – 13 per cent of the total. slightly, it seems that the problem chaired by Theresa May and Iain For forces outside London, the of violent, drug-dealing, youth Duncan Smith in October 2011. majority recorded fewer than 10 gangs is ultimately reducible to the Clearly, this event was planned when per cent of all arrestees being ‘troubled family’. If, by dint of a David Cameron and his advisers still identified as gang members. concerted, long term effort, we can believed that the August riots were solve this problem, then the problem orchestrated by violent youth gangs.
    [Show full text]
  • Full Text of the Speech by Prime Minister Theresa May
    Full text of the speech by Prime Minister Theresa May "A little over six months ago, the British people voted for change. They voted to shape a brighter future for our country. They voted to leave the European Union and embrace the world. And they did so with their eyes open: accepting that the road ahead will be uncertain at times, but believing that it leads towards a brighter future for their children - and their grandchildren too. And it is the job of this Government to deliver it. That means more than negotiating our new relationship with the EU. It means taking the opportunity of this great moment of national change to step back and ask ourselves what kind of country we want to be. My answer is clear. I want this United Kingdom to emerge from this period of change stronger, fairer, more united and more outward-looking than ever before. I want us to be a secure, prosperous, tolerant country - a magnet for international talent and a home to the pioneers and innovators who will shape the world ahead. I want us to be a truly Global Britain - the best friend and neighbour to our European partners, but a country that reaches beyond the borders of Europe too. A country that goes out into the world to build relationships with old friends and new allies alike. I want Britain to be what we have the potential, talent and ambition to be. A great, global trading nation that is respected around the world and strong, confident and united at home.
    [Show full text]
  • Forward, Together: Our Plan for a Stronger Britain and a Prosperous Future Will Meet the Great Challenges of Our Time, Beyond Brexit
    FORWARD, TOGETHER Our Plan for a Stronger Britain and a Prosperous Future THE CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2017 The next five years are the most challenging that Britain has faced in my lifetime. Brexit will define us: our place in the world, our economic security and our future prosperity. So now more than ever, Britain needs a strong and stable government to get the best Brexit deal for our country and its people. Now more than ever, Britain needs strong and stable leadership to make the most of the opportunities Brexit brings for hardworking families. Now more than ever, Britain needs a clear plan. This manifesto, Forward, Together: Our Plan for a Stronger Britain and a Prosperous Future will meet the great challenges of our time, beyond Brexit. With this plan and with a strong hand through Brexit, we will build a stronger, fairer, more prosperous Britain, for all of us. Theresa May Prime Minister 1 THE CONSERVATIVE AND UNIONIST PARTY MANIFESTO 2017 2 CONTENTS Foreword .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 4 Five giant challenges ............................................................................................................................................................................... 6 1. A strong economy that works for everyone ........................................................................ 11 2. A strong and
    [Show full text]
  • Last Chance for an Exit from Brexit?
    POLICY BRIEF 29 March 2018 Last chance for an exit from Brexit? Fabian Zuleeg "Brexit means Brexit, and we're going to make a success of it." 1 Theresa May, Speech in Birmingham, 11 July 2016 "The only real alternative to a 'hard Brexit' is 'no Brexit'." 2 Donald Tusk, Speech at the Annual Conference of the European Policy Centre, 13 October 2016 "The British people should be given a final say on whatever deal is negotiated. If they are allowed that say, then Brexit can be averted." 3 Tony Blair, Speech to the European Policy Centre, 1 March 2018 "Rather than rescuing the European Union by keeping it intact, an exit from Brexit could splinter the Union from within." 4 Fabian Zuleeg, Exit from Brexit? Not likely but uncertainty prevails, EPC Commentary, 12 July 2016 BACKGROUND – TO BREXIT, OR NOT? The will of the people? The result of the Brexit referendum on 23 June 2016 came as a shock to many, including much of the political establishment in the United Kingdom (UK). With a relatively narrow margin of victory (less than 4%) and Scotland, Northern Ireland, and London clearly voting to Remain, the vote left the country deeply divided. The immediate decision of Prime Minister David Cameron to resign, triggering a leadership contest in the Conservative Party, added to the overall sense of dislocation. In addition, there was a degree of uncertainty about the final outcome. In the UK, a referendum is non-binding and the final decision-making body remains the House of Commons. Since there appeared to be a solid Remain majority in Westminster then, there was speculation that the result of the referendum might not be followed, and that Brexit could be averted.
    [Show full text]
  • “Benefit Tourism” and Migration Policy in the UK
    “Benefit Tourism” and Migration Policy in the U.K.: The Construction of Policy Narratives Meghan Luhman Ph.D. Candidate, Dept. of Political Science Johns Hopkins University [email protected] February 2015 Draft Prepared for EUSA Conference March 5­7, 2015, Boston, MA. Please do not cite or circulate without author’s permission. 1 I. Introduction In 2004, ten new member states, eight from Central and Eastern Europe (the so­called “A8” countries), joined the European Union. European Union citizens have the right to freely move throughout and reside in (subject to conditions) all member states. At the time, though thirteen out of fifteen existing E.U. member states put temporary restrictions on migrants from these new member states, the U.K. decided to give these migrants immediate full access to the labor market. While in France, for example, fears about the “Polish plumber” taking French jobs became a hot topic of debate and caused the French to implement temporary controls, in the U.K. Tony Blair highlighted “the opportunities of accession” to fill in gaps in the U.K. economy (T​he Guardian, 2​7 April 2004). Blair’s Conservative opponents had also largely supported enlargement in the 1990s, noting the expansion of the E.U. would increase trade and “encourage stability and prosperity” (HC Deb 21 May 2003 vol 405 cc1021). The U.K. was hailed by members of the European Parliament as welcoming, and in spite of some fears of strain on social services and benefits, studies showed that the migrants had been a net benefit for the U.K.
    [Show full text]
  • Analyzing the Post-Brexit Conservative Party's Populist Status Quo1 Winn, Jacob2
    Brexit: A Fluke or the Future of British Conservatism? 119 BREXIT: A FLUKE OR THE FUTURE OF BRITISH CONSERVATISM? Analyzing the Post-Brexit Conservative Party's Populist Status Quo1 Winn, Jacob2 ABSTRacT The Brexit vote — the British people’s vote to leave the European Union in 2016 — represents the outcome of a successful populist movement. More recently, the Conservative Party’s staggering 2019 electoral success demonstrated that the populist “Get Brexit Done” message remains popular among both traditional Conservatives and broad swaths of the working class in former Labour Party strongholds. This study aims to explain the Conservative Party’s marked change rhetoric and policy, as well as factional shifts within the halls of Westminster, in response to the ongoing Brexit negotiations. While some scholars look at the supply- side causes of populism (elites and political parties) and others look at the demand- side causes (the voters), this study applies a third school of thought that examines the relationship between supply and demand by analyzing a series of interviews with Conservative Party staff as well as public opinion polling. In doing so, the study concludes that there has been a deep, reciprocal, and simultaneous onset of populist Euroscepticism within both the Conservative Party and the working class 1 This work is licensed under CC BY 4.0. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons. org/licenses/by/4.0 2 Jacob Winn is a Fall 2020 graduate from The George Washington University's Elliott School of International Affairs. He earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in International Affairs, with a concentration in International Politics, and a double major in Political Science.
    [Show full text]
  • Presidential Scholarship Luncheon
    Cuyahoga Community College Foundation PRESIDENTIAL SCHOLARSHIP LUNCHEON presented by - FEATURING - The Right Honourable Theresa May Prime Minister of the United Kingdom (2016-2019) Member of Parliament for Maidenhead - MODERATED BY - Pat Pastore PNC Bank Regional President of Cleveland THURSDAY, MAY 13, 2021 NOON Benefiting scholarships for Tri-C® students Our Speaker – THERESA MAY PRESIDENTIAL SCHOLARSHIP LUNCHEON The Right Honourable Theresa May The Right Honourable Theresa May served as Prime Minister of the United Kingdom and Leader of the Conservative Party from 2016 to 2019, during an extraordinary time in global affairs. She began her political career stuffing envelopes at her local Conservative Association before becoming a councillor in the London Borough of Merton. In May 1997, she was elected as the Member of Parliament for her home community of Maidenhead, a position she still holds today. Appointed Home Secretary in May 2010, Mrs. May made history by becoming the longest-serving Conservative Home Secretary in the past century. Hallmarks of her tenure include reduced crime, police reform and the introduction of the landmark Modern Slavery Act. In 2005, Mrs. May co- founded Women2Win, an organization dedicated to increasing the number of Conservative women in Parliament and in public life. Following her election as Leader of the Conservative Party, Mrs. May was appointed Prime Minister in July 2016 — the first woman to hold the position since Margaret Thatcher. As Prime Minister, Mrs. May led negotiations with the European Union after the country’s historic Brexit referendum. She also oversaw the largest ever cash boost to the United Kingdom’s National Health Service and the largest expansion of mental health services in a generation.
    [Show full text]
  • Mind the Gap: How the Ethnic Minority Vote Cost Theresa May Her Majority
    Mind the gap: How the ethnic minority vote cost Theresa May her majority Sunder Katwala and Steve Ballinger September 2017 Published September 2017 by: British Future Kean House 6 Kean Street London WC2B 4AS Authors: Sunder Katwala and Steve Ballinger Editor: Steve Ballinger Design: Laura Dias Additional research by Laura Dias About British Future: British Future is an independent, non-partisan thinktank engaging people’s hopes and fears about integration and migration, opportunity and identity, so that we share a confident and welcoming Britain, inclusive and fair to all. www.britishfuture.org Tel. +44 (0)20 7632 9069 Twitter: @BritishFuture 2 British Future / Mind the gap: How the ethnic minority vote cost Theresa May her majority Contents 1. Introduction: Mind the gap 4 2. The 2017 General Election: how much is known about the ethnic minority vote? 8 3. How the ethnic vote gap influenced the 2017 General Election outcome 11 4. Block vote or up for grabs? Are ethnic minority voters becoming floating voters? 16 5. Who are the different ethnic minority voter ‘tribes’? 21 6. Conclusion: The One Nation challenge 24 Notes 30 About British Future 31 3 British Future / Mind the gap: How the ethnic minority vote cost Theresa May her majority 1. Introduction: Mind the gap Theresa May called the snap General Election of June 2017 intending to increase the Conservative majority in the House of Commons. The plan failed: the Conservatives failed to gain most of the seats that they were targeting in England and Wales, and suffered unexpected losses to the Labour Party. The Conservatives went into the General Election with 330 seats and a working majority of 17 seats; they came out of it with just 318 seats, 8 seats short of a majority at all.
    [Show full text]
  • Tories Should Have Faith in Their Grassroots; Party Members Must Not Be Banned from Electing a Leader - They Need More Power, Not Less
    5th September 2016, The Times, http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/tories-should-have-faith-in-their- grassroots-bqn3b9fns Tories should have faith in their grassroots; Party members must not be banned from electing a leader - they need more power, not less Mark Wallace What possessed the members of the Conservative Party, 15 years ago this month? Newly entrusted with the power to choose their leader, they proceeded to elect Iain Duncan Smith, one of the most woeful opposition leaders of modern times. The decision has been interpreted ever since by MPs and observers alike as a sign that card-carrying Conservatives are deranged - "swivel-eyed loons", in the alleged words of a certain former senior CCHQ official. The experience left scars on the parliamentary Conservative Party. When Mr Duncan Smith was unseated in 2003, MPs refused to offer the membership any choice at all, opting unanimously for Michael Howard. When Mr Howard stood down in 2005, he attempted to strip the membership of their power and put MPs completely in charge once more. The 1922 Committee supported him. Happily, after concerted resistance, the proposal to return the party to feudalism failed to pass. So it isn't a surprise to see the idea crop up again, raised this time by Andrew Tyrie, chairman of the Treasury select committee, who was cheerleader for Mr Howard's proposals the first time round. In Mr Tyrie's letter, Andrea Leadsom's name has joined Mr Duncan Smith's in the column marked "cautionary tales". He argues that her withdrawal from the leadership race was a "narrow escape" for the government, which could have been saddled with a prime minister who did not have the support of MPs.
    [Show full text]
  • George Bradshaw Address 2020 Rt. Hon. Sir Patrick Mcloughlin CH
    George Bradshaw Address 2020 Rt. Hon. Sir Patrick McLoughlin CH Check against delivery Thank you, it is a great privilege to be invited to deliver the annual Address named in honour of George Bradshaw – Victorian map-maker, publisher, railway enthusiast, and the man who has done more than any other to make Michael Portillo wealthier and even more famous – if only for his new-found dress sense. Michael, of course, is an old friend who I served alongside as a Minister in the Department of Transport, and his TV programmes are a great advertisement for our railway, reviving interest in the old routes, the stations, viaducts and tunnels, and bringing the Bradshaw Guides back into print. Bradshaw has a fantastic, enthusiastic turn of phrase: I note that when he describes the ‘new’ Palace of Westminster in his guide for tourists, he writes: ‘let us hope that the future representatives of Great Britain will not prove inferior to their predecessors in genius and patriotism.’ 1 Well – that’s one for others to judge! And we’ll all have our own views. I first came into Parliament in a by-election in 1986, winning by just 100 votes. I was 28 years old. I left Parliament last year, a little older – well, 33 years older - perhaps wiser, having served Prime Ministers from Margaret Thatcher to Boris Johnson, and seen John Major, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, David Cameron, and Theresa May come and go from No.10. I was fortunate enough to serve in the Thatcher and Major Governments as a junior minister, including in transport.
    [Show full text]